Review: Tina Fey, Amy Poehler and Jodie Foster highlight a memorable Golden Globes
Seth MacFarlane and the Oscars have a tough act to follow
A mustachioed Tina Fey and Amy Poehler at the Golden Globes.
Are you a fan of Girls?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Good luck following that, Seth MacFarlane.
The 2013 Golden Globes were that rarest of 21st century beasts: an entertainment awards show that was genuinely entertaining on its own merits, even with a variety of technical glitches along the way. It had two sterling, hilarious hosts in Tina Fey and Amy Poehler, a slew of other amusing and/or memorable presenters and speeches, some surprising winners and a few tears being genuinely jerked along the way.
It had all those things in part because of how the night broke, in part because of the talents of people like Fey, Poehler, Kristen Wiig and Will Ferrell, and in part because of that thing the Golden Globes always has going for it, even on less successful nights:
The Globes go first.
Really, the only reason we care about this particular ceremony at all is timing. No one knows exactly who's in the Hollywood Foreign Press or what they do, but these strange people with their strange tastes had the good sense to put on an awards show that comes many weeks before the Oscars — and that, for a long time, was the televised start of awards season. There are now other precursors — both the people and the critics have already chosen their winners in televised ceremonies — but the Globes are where and when this stuff really starts to feel like it matters to the business. The Globes show sets the agenda for what follows, and often make the biggest splash in terms of how the winners react. When Jamie Foxx did the Ray Charles call-and-response when he won at the Globes, it was fresh and exciting; by the time he did it at that year's Oscars, even he seemed tired of the gimmick.
So it's hard to imagine Anne Hathaway giving an Oscar speech as good as the one she gave tonight, with the way it smartly drew a line from fellow nominee Sally Field (who went from "Gidget" and "The Flying Nun" to a pair of Oscars) to her own "Princess Diaries" beginnings — not unless she's just going to give the same speech each time. If Jessica Chastain beats Jennifer Lawrence (and Emmanuelle Riva, for that matter) for the Academy Award, it's hard to believe her emotions will seem quite as raw as they were this evening.
And with all due respect to MacFarlane, it's hard to imagine him doing much with the gauntlet thrown down by Fey and Poehler as hosts.
It's not that the longtime pals did anything unexpected with the job — their opening patter was essentially a "Weekend Update" reunion with fancier hairstyles and a more specific target — but few in the business do it as consistently, hilariously, well as they do it, particularly together. The warm rapport the two have achieves a remarkable thing: it takes jokes that were at times just as vicious as anything Ricky Gervais said during any of his three Globes stint — Poehler on Kathryn Bigelow: "When it comes to torture, I trust the lady who spent three years married to James Cameron" — and makes them seem somehow much less mean.
As usual with any long awards shows, the hosts can only do so much after the first 10 minutes, but Fey and Poehler made their later appearances count, whether they were pretending to be nominees — Fey went all drag king "as a professional volleyball player battling restless leg syndrome, Damian Francisco in 'Dog President'" — or breathlessly responding to the appearance by President Clinton. (Poehler: "Wow! What an exciting special guest: that was Hilary Clinton's husband!") After "Girls" creator/star Lena Dunham beat both hosts for the comedy actress award, Fey and Poehler returned from a commercial break as a pair of mean drunks, with Fey referencing Dunham's speech by sneering, "Congratulations, Lena. I'm glad that we got you through middle school!" Poehler even closed the show with the perfect line: "Good night! We're going home with Jodie Foster!"
But with the hosts' presence more and more minimal as the three-hour show moved along, it was up to others to keep things interesting. And the winners and presenters obliged, whether it was Ferrell and Wiig inventing plots for nominated movies they hadn't seen — a bit made all the funnier by Tommy Lee Jones' stone-faced reaction to it — Dunham's two speeches alternating between endearing terror, heartfelt insight ("This award is for every woman who's ever felt like there wasn't a space for her") and unexpected digs at Hilary Swank (alluding to Swank's first Oscar speech, "I always promised myself if I ever got this opportunity, I would thank Chad Lowe!"), or Chastain and Kevin Costner each alluding to the early career struggles that eventually led to this moment.
So even when the audio dropped out, or the telemprompter failed while Paul Rudd and Salma Hayek were attempting to introduce the TV drama series nominees, you could count on something entertaining to happen in short order.
Sometimes, the Golden Globes can be as much of an ordeal as any other awards show — if not more, due to the eccentric tastes of HFPA. This was a very good night, though, and one I imagine we'll be thinking back to a lot on that night, many weeks from now, when the Oscars finally take their turn at the dance.
Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching
Around the Web
News From Our Partners
-
What to Watch This Weekend: The Season Premieres of True Blood and Magic City, the Season Finale of Nurse Jackie, and the Series Finale of The Borgias
Graceland "Guadalajara Dog" Review: Smokey and the Bandits
News Briefs: Starz and 50 Cent Are Powering Up for a New Drama
-
Watch This: Amer offers all the formal pleasures, and none of the clunky narrative filler, of your average giallo
Hear This: Jimmy Eat World would like everyone to forget about “Reason 346”
Crosstalk: How do we build a better television festival?
-
'Mad Men' Season 6 Finale Spoilers: Matthew Weiner Reveals Death Toll!
'Only God Forgives' Trailer: Ryan Gosling Wants Revenge
The Wrap Up: The 'Paranoia' Poster Unites Harrison Ford, Gary Oldman and Liam Hemsworth
-
'Killing Season' Trailer: John Travolta Hunts Robert De Niro
Emma Watson Studied Kardashian Accents to Prep for 'Bling Ring'
Is 'Star Wars' Going to Disney World?
-
Deadmau5 to Make Cameo in New Justin Timberlake Flick 'Runner, Runner'
SHINee Member Key Admits to Crushing on a Fellow K-Pop Star
Carly Rae Jepsen Performs New Version of 'Call Me Maybe on 'Good Morning America' + Appears at amfAR Gala [Pics + Videos]
-
Obama Taps Former Campaign Official For Top Position
'Hawaii Five-0' Stages 'Lost' Reunion
She's Gonna Make It After All
-
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - Awkward.: Why Season 3 Has Been So Disappointing
The Telefile - Critics' Choice Television Awards 2013: The Winners
-
'Man Of Steel' Decoded: Your Guide To Krypton's Geekiest Lingo
Superman Reviewed: What Are People Saying About 'Man Of Steel'?
Matt Damon's 'Elysium' Trailer: Watch Now!




Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupSomeGuy
January 14, 2013 at 1:19AM EST Reply to CommentCan someone explain to me what's so appealing about Girls? It's not a bad show but it is really overrated imo. I don't recall laughing out loud once in the show (especially compared to a lot of other comedy shows which are on air right now). Someone on twitter summed it up I think "Girls is Sex And The City for hipsters."
sepinwall Well, I've attempted to explain it here
January 14, 2013 at 1:23AM ESThttp://www.hitfix.com/blogs/whats-alan-watching/posts/review-hbos-girls-brilliantly-channels-lena-dunhams-comic-voice
and here
http://www.hitfix.com/whats-alan-watching/tv-top-20-of-2012-new-girl-boardwalk-empire-lead-the-best-of-the-rest
and here
http://www.hitfix.com/whats-alan-watching/review-girls-still-up-to-bad-behavior-in-season-2
Your mileage obviously varies, which is fine.
You are not alone, and I'm somegirl.
January 14, 2013 at 1:29AM ESTSomeGuy I don't think it's a bad show by any means - I just don't think of it as being too funny. It's interesting to watch and Lena Dunham is very good.
January 14, 2013 at 1:49AM ESTsvetlana I watch girls and find it just okay. It's not particularly funny or ground breaking a critics seem to think. For a writer I thought Dunhams speech sucked! She was the only one to read from a piece of paper which takes all the feeling and genuine emotion out of it. Jessica chastain and ben affleck gave the best speeches in my opinion. And I loved Jennifer garner thanking people for Ben. Amy and tina were great too.
January 14, 2013 at 1:56AM EST
I find Girls painful and unwatchable.
January 14, 2013 at 2:01AM ESTIt's like a senior thesis project that someone masturbated all over. But the prof loves it and there's so much bunk to get all semiotic about amidst the unending drivel it is one big gold star for effort. Yuck.
And every time Lena Dunham opens her yap -- which in her chronic twenty something mode is way too often and is stuffed to the gills self-focused narcissism -- I want to superglue her lips together.
Yes you have tattoos. Shocker! Please don't feel the need to show us. Yes you speak for a certain strain of New Yorker. But you aren't that interesting or funny or compelling.
I think people want to lift this chick up and encourage folks like her and Whitney Cummings so there will be women in the industry. And really they are just as capable of being as mediocre as most men in the industry. But I refuse to treat them or their shows as if they are the second coming. They just aren't good enough.
virginia I've tried to get into Girls but find it a tough slog. There's an unpleasant undercurrent to it that turns me off. Perhaps it's because I remember vividly being that age in the 70s and can't relate at all to this crew of young women. Doesn't make it a bad show -- I just don't enjoy it. I guess what one can't relate to at all begins to seem phony.
January 14, 2013 at 8:55AM ESTMike I agree with the above feelings about Girls, not funny. And as much as I love reading everything Alan writes, he is not one to buck the critic trend. I could tell you before I saw one clip of a show whether or not Alan would like it, based solely on who was in it. This is why I knew he would like The Mindy Project and basically everything Shawn Ryan does. First became clear after he steadfastly stood by Chicago Code.
January 14, 2013 at 9:11AM ESTIan Whitcombe Mike, I have no idea why you just had to insult Alan professionally if you claim to "love reading everything Alan writes"
January 14, 2013 at 12:13PM ESTFor the record, Alan was ambivalent about several things in the early episodes of Girls. And had reactions that spanned the entire positive-mixed-negative spectrum to Last Resort and Chicago Code.
joel It's funny how much hate this show gets whenever it comes up. Count me in the camp that thinks it's one the best things on TV.
January 14, 2013 at 12:45PM ESTWe all get it. Thanks.
LJA I watched Dunham's first (? or, breakthrough?) film Tiny Furniture after having watched Season 1 of Girls. I was an ambivalent fan of Girls to begin with but whatever charm the series may have held was lost after I discovered that Dunham has basically recycled her same character from the film.
January 14, 2013 at 12:54PM ESTswinkle Someguy, I'm a 50 year old woman who loves this show. What's so appealing to me about it is that it's the most excrutiatingly embarrassing, painfully honest and funny portrayal of what it was like and is evidently still like to be young, 20 something women finding their way in a culture that still gives young women a map of how to be acceptable and then how they try to fit into that mold to please others, but still be honest with themselves. It's helped me understand what I went through so many years ago, how things have changed for young women today and how things haven't changed.How brave and honest Lena Dunham is to bare it all for us to laugh with or at, to relate to or to judge.
January 14, 2013 at 10:47PM ESTMaggie Q Another 50 year old woman here who really enjoys the show (Hi, Swinkle! Glad to see another outside the target demographic who feels the same.) To me, Sex and the City was about the NYC girl I wanted to be, but Girls is about the one I actually was.
January 15, 2013 at 9:06AM ESTAnother Guest And yet another 50+ woman here, but one who finds the show insufferable. It saddens me that 35 years after I marched for the ERA, so many priveleged young women are making such bad life decisions.
January 15, 2013 at 12:13PM ESTJMMMMMMMMMMMMM
January 14, 2013 at 1:26AM EST Reply to CommentThe really weird this is: apparently, Lena Dunham did promise Chad Lowe she'd thank him:
https://twitter.com/lenadunham/status/232891076887863296
morningstar Agree with Svetlana. I will be SO happy when "Lisa" Dunham's fifeen minutes are up. She stole that award from four actresses who actually HAVE talent.
January 14, 2013 at 2:42AM ESTnic919
January 14, 2013 at 1:27AM EST Reply to CommentWho does Seth McFarlane know to have gotten the Oscar hosting gig? I only know him as the voice behind Family Guy, and I can't see his style of humour working with that crowd. Even Letterman, who at least had name recognition, was not able to translate his more sarcastic humour the year he hosted. McFarlane seems like a smarmy frat boy in every interview I have seen him in and I would almost rather a return of the Franco/ Hathaway fiasco.
Is there anyway Fey and Poehler can get the Oscar gig this year too? I think they would be great with it and the movie stars are more likely to prefer their humour anyway.
Jonas.Left MacFarlane had a hit movie, demonstrated on SNL a skill for sketch comedy, he's a decent singer, and he's witty off tbe cuff. Subjective notions of taste aside, he's qualified.
January 14, 2013 at 1:42AM ESTCousin Larry Appleton I'm not a huge MacFarlane fan, but he certainly has name recognition. He's the creator of multiple popular TV shows, and his first foray into movies - Ted - made over 200 million, a ton for an R rated comedy.
January 14, 2013 at 1:46AM ESTI personally feel that, much like his shows, there will probably be a ratio of 2-3 bad jokes for every 1 good joke, and he'll be more than adequate at the usual song & dance numbers that the Oscars seem to love so much.
I agree with getting Fey and Poehler to host everything from now on. If they're unavailable get Wiig and Ferrell.
Jeff "Smarmy frat boy?" While Family Guy isn't always my cup of tea, I've never gotten a vibe anything like that off of him. I think you're going to be surprised. I expect this Oscar telecast will be going for a classic, old school Hollywood kind of showmanship (with of course some occasional edgy moments thrown in).
January 14, 2013 at 2:20PM ESTLee I actually think that, rather than a "smarmy frat boy," MacFarlane might have been a bit of a nerd growing up (and I don't mean that in a bad way). He has featured half-forgotten old musical numbers like "Shiboopee," "Mr. Booze" and "Somewhere That's Green" on FAMILY GUY, which leads me to think that he has a real affection for "Old" Hollywood. He has a fantastic and ironic sense of humor and a gift for doing multiple voices seamlessly. I'm looking forward to seeing him host the Oscars.
January 14, 2013 at 3:15PM ESTyoungjt80 I think the buzz for MacFarlane hosting started after he hosted one of the roasts on Comedy Central, but I can't remember which one. He had very good stage presence.
January 14, 2013 at 5:27PM ESTWeebeysPlasticFish It even felt like on Ted his humor doesn't translate well outside of an animated show or a roast (anytime Mark Wahlburg said something racist, it just felt icky). He definitely goes for shock-value and inappropriate, like having lots of jokes that use stereotypes, but not to poke fun at the stereotype, and I can't see that going well at the Oscars.
January 16, 2013 at 12:12PM ESTtwincinema
January 14, 2013 at 1:36AM EST Reply to CommentThe audio didn't exactly "drop out" -- it was muted for profanity; something you hear fairly often in live TV broadcasts. Not that you were implying NBC had a production error, but when placed next to teleprompter failure, it could be misconstrued.
I think NBC did a great job with their censoring -- nothing "illegal" made it through and there was minimal distraction.
MC Uh, I thought the audio drop-outs were terribly distracting, particularly because it cut off things that were not profanity, like parts of people's speeches. I still think whatever Jodie Foster said in that long silent moment was the key portion that held that somewhat incoherent speech together....
January 14, 2013 at 1:46AM ESTborgetas @MC
January 14, 2013 at 3:49AM ESTVulture posted a transcript of the speech.
The audio did drop out in that part, and it wasn't because of censoring (at least it doesn't seem like it).
http://www.vulture.com/2013/01/read-jodie-fosters-golden-globes-speech.html
Tflores
January 14, 2013 at 1:37AM EST Reply to CommentWas the camera showing "wrap up" on the teleprompter one of the tech glitches? Not sure I remember ever seeing that before.
GarySF Noticed that too. Don't think they're supposed to show that, and it just lasted a second, but no big deal.
January 14, 2013 at 10:19AM ESTWriterRoss I saw the sign more often than a one-time camera angle slip up. Started o think it was intentional.
January 15, 2013 at 3:32AM ESTJim
January 14, 2013 at 1:42AM EST Reply to CommentTommy Lee Jones' reaction to Wiig and Ferrell's bit was the same as mine. It also mirrors my opinion of SNL, where they take one bad premise, and run it into the ground. They were massively unfunny.
Agree that skit went on too long. We got the point very quickly. Chronic SNL-itis. Not so good.
January 14, 2013 at 1:49AM ESTSemi-enjoyable Golden Globes because of the game fun of Tina Fey and Amy Poehler. But it was pretty benign and lackluster.
Excited to have a Louis CK sighting but I am already bored by this awards season.
TJ Also they more or less had the same two jokes for each movie. Except Quartet. That was the only amusing one, really.
January 14, 2013 at 8:39AM ESTThe whole bit was saved of course by Tommy Lee Jones. But I'm with those who found it a good idea, poorly and painfully executed.
WriterRoss I will throw my own Tommy Lee Jones endorsement here because I didn't get the humor of the Wiig/Ferrell gig at all. Wiig constantly plays her comedy from the same acting persons; never feels organically funny.
January 14, 2013 at 9:27AM ESTAnoel I so agree, I thought it was unfunny and is yet another reason why I don't watch SNL.
January 14, 2013 at 4:06PM ESTevolution1085
January 14, 2013 at 1:45AM EST Reply to CommentNo comment on the winners for the tv awards Alan? Or when Don Cheadle wins and Homeland wins for the weaker of its two seasons, you just shake your head and go "that's the globes for ya"
smellmyfinger spot on. ive watched and read the reviews of every episode of every single show that was nominated for drama (breaking bad, donwton abbey, homeland, boardwalk empire and the newsroom) as well as all the actors for best actor in a drama (hamm, buscemi, lewis, cranston, daniels) and there is NO WAY, NONE, AT ALL, that homeland should've won those two awards with the season they just put on. both them should've probably gone to breaking bad and cranston, if not hamm, but the HFPA felt that they needed to vindicate their Homeland choice last year (which was also a screw job) so they picked them again. this is what makes you shake your head in disapproval
January 14, 2013 at 10:57AM ESTLee Harvey
January 14, 2013 at 2:01AM EST Reply to CommentKnee-jerk reactions:
* Not enough Fey and Poehler.
* As much as I like Wiig and Ferrell and what they did, it still went on too long.
* Hated that they obviously fell behind and had to rush through the latter part of the show.
NJMark Ferrell and Wiig were essentially doing ARMISEN and Wiig's "Garth and Kat" bit from SNL.
January 14, 2013 at 1:29PM ESTAnd yeah, it was too long.
Dezbot I freaking HATE Garth & Kat. And Will Ferrell (I'm meh on Wiig). I'm with Tommy Lee Jones on that bit.
January 15, 2013 at 1:13PM ESTLasso
January 14, 2013 at 2:12AM EST Reply to CommentYou can all read Jodie's ex girlfriend who she thanked at the Globes Cydney Berard bio and see pics of her and Jodie here.http://showbizdaily.net/celebrity-bio/cydney-bernard-is-jodie-fosters-ex-girlfriend-photos/
morningstar
January 14, 2013 at 2:29AM EST Reply to CommentExcellent recap and I agree! The hosts were amazing, the speeches heartfelt, and Ben and ARGO WON!!! All in all a fab awards show. I'm still not sure what I think of Jodie's speech, half batshit crazy, half wonderful.
Jodie Foster's Hamster
January 14, 2013 at 2:33AM EST Reply to CommentSeth McFarlene is in a tough spot. There's a lot of internet movie/tv writers that react to anything he does like Fox News reacts to anything Obama does. Even if he does well, they might sit there like Tommy Lee Jones during a Will Ferrell/Kristen Wiig bit.
Alan- Consider how you feel about Fey and Poehler. Consider how you feel about Seth McFarlene. Even if he does well, what are the odds you'd like something he did more than something they did? It's an unfair curve to grade him on.
Grubi I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure Alan doesn't dislike McFarlene. He just doesn't really watch any of his shows and is pretty much ambivalent about him. And when him and Dan addressed McFarlene's selection on the podcast, I think they both approved of it. McFarlene may be known as the creator of Family Guy, but I'm pretty sure his true passion is performing, particularly singing and dancing.
January 14, 2013 at 2:55AM ESTsepinwall Yeah, I don't hate MacFarlane, and have been known to laugh quite loudly at Family Guy, et al, when I watch them. But hosting these things is hard for anyone, and these hosts and this particular show set a very high bar.
January 14, 2013 at 9:11AM ESTDezbot I say this as someone who used to like Family Guy in its first iteration and can't stand it now: I've seen MacFarlane at Comic-Con and he's very funny. Very funny. I'm a little worried because his schtick with Emma Stone at the announcements was off, but I'm hoping he gets it right by the time of the Oscars. If they tamp down his humor too much, it's going to make for one long show, but if they let him do what he does at Con (albeit without the profanity), it could be a very entertaining night.
January 15, 2013 at 1:16PM ESTmorningstar
January 14, 2013 at 2:40AM EST Reply to CommentAgree with Svetlana. I will be SO happy when "Lisa" Dunham's fifeen minutes are up. She stole that award from four actresses who actually HAVE talent.
Adamco Lena dunham is an incredible writer and director. Her own Acting aside, she fills each character with distinct motivations, subtle idiosyncratic quirks, and their own style and humor. People who quickly discard her as a "talent" need to look more closely at why girls upsets them so much.
January 14, 2013 at 2:02PM ESTmorningstar AdanCo. Sorry no. The show doesn't upset me because i don't watch it (i did for a few episodes). I think this girl has no talent and is a member of "the lucky sperm club" and mentored by Judd (I AM COMEDY) Apatow to boot so she benefits from all of this. THe show sucks. HBO has no rating so they can keep it around for all the press (plenty negative) it gets. To be clear, i don't discard her as a talent, I discard her as having ANY TALENT at all, can't write, can't act, can't direct.
January 14, 2013 at 6:18PM ESTthe BGT
January 14, 2013 at 2:41AM EST Reply to CommentI don't think I have enjoyed any awards as much as I had tonite (with the exception of the 97 Oscars but that was the Titanic year and the jokes were so many..).
I can't find any bad moments in the show and it was the first time I laughed out loud so many times during an award ceremony.
I dont agree with some of the awards but who cares really?
Oh and FINALLY Modern Family didnt win a thing! yay! :>
JLPatt You couldn't find anything bad? Maybe people being rudely pushed off the stage by music and overbearing, antsy producers? Sure this is hardly the first time that's happened, but it doesn't make it any less rude.
January 14, 2013 at 3:13AM ESTOr maybe the endless, random cutaways to people in the audience that had nothing to do whatsoever with the people giving speeches? I call that "bad." And distracting.
The whole modern structure of these awards shows is a huge "bad" in itself. They're horrendously rushed, and we're not given enough time with the winners who should be having their rightful moment in the spotlight and not tossed eagerly off the stage.
TJ Personally I'd be ok with winners getting played off as soon as they start non-family lists of people to thank. It'd be nice if the speeches were actual speeches.
January 14, 2013 at 8:43AM ESTthe BGT I dont really care who they want to thank for, except family. These people might wanna thank the whole network of agents, friends, executives and the rest of the hollywood circle they PRed for them. I do not care. As for their time in spotlite, they know the TV time rules and they should respect them.
January 14, 2013 at 9:22AM ESTAs simple as that!
nic919 How many cutaways to Jack Black did we need last night? I didn't mind him in Bernie, but it seems like someone on the production side was a little obsessed with him because we saw more of him than Clooney or JLo. His reactions weren't even that funny.
January 14, 2013 at 9:23AM ESTRocket
January 14, 2013 at 10:53AM EST Reply to CommentTina and Amy were good as expected. The Ferrell-Wiig bit was the highlight of the night.
Sasha Baron Cohen was classy as usual. Brits love vagina humor.
I skipped most of the acceptance speeches in an attempt to save time.
I think Seth MacFarlane will hit it out of the park.
Heisenberg
January 14, 2013 at 12:22PM EST Reply to CommentBreaking Bad, Sherlock, Aaron Paul or Jonnathan Banks and Louie or Parks (which weren't even nominated) should've won, so no, I don't agree. The ceremony may have been entertaining, but the winners weren't correct, so, it was disappointing, as usual. Still, I guess it was an entertaining ceremony.
virginia
January 14, 2013 at 12:50PM EST Reply to CommentJust wanted to put in a note of praise for the Golden Globes overall and their selections. We know little or nothing about tv and movie preferences abroad and that's too bad for us over all especially when it comes to the former. Some amazing TV being made abroad that we don't get to see unless we are living away. Or it's English language. Ditto on movies. It's good to get a report card like this. The foreign press isn't just eccentric -- It's foreign and good for them for doing this and giving us selections that are what they are.
The choice of Argo was great and something that should have happened in house -- at least in terms of a nomination. And good for us that shows such as Girls, which I don't much enjoy, got kudos etc.
Homeland is a show that went into total nose dive this season but okay to go there. I was happy to see Modern Family take a back seat and Breaking Bad, with the exception of Jonathan Banks, was up for a dress down too. Mr. Banks' loss in this is the one that makes more most sad. He so deserved it.
I can't get behind overly done acceptance speeches. For me, there's a gold standard when it comes to acknowledging honors and that is Peter O'Toole who was passed over over and over again and gave the most gracious, elegant, and really funny acceptance speech ever. Nothing against Jodie Foster or any of the other over the toppers but Americans could learn from the Brits on this -- Less is more ... This is one where you want to nail it tightly and rightly.
JODIE SPEECH
January 14, 2013 at 1:02PM EST Reply to CommentEntertaining show. Best atmosphere of the award shows, as always.
Foster's speech was odd. Aside from the lesbian and actress retirement themes, I felt like there was alot of subtext or insider information that made the speech meaningful to alot of people in that room, but confusing and meandering to those watching on TV. The piece to her mother was touching.
Adamco She explained the context of her situation pretty well, i thought. Child actor since she was 3. Her life had been in the public eye since before reality tv was popular and she has a unique perspective(and maybe its made her a little... quirky). She has finally come to a decision to move on from acting because that is not where true happiness is to be found for her.
January 14, 2013 at 2:08PM ESTAl
January 14, 2013 at 1:13PM EST Reply to CommentPoehler and Fey could have been so much better, they kind of limped the whole way through. Seth can easily destroy this.
Spacer
January 14, 2013 at 1:38PM EST Reply to CommentOk what am I missing? How does Jessica Chastain win anything for that performance? I am seriously confused about the lack of criticism of her acting in ZDT (although she wasn't given much to workwith, but still).
JerseyRudy To each his or her own. I thought her performance was excellent. She captured the restrained intensity of her character...showing the obsessive focus but also the loneliness. I can't imagine anyone doing it better.
January 14, 2013 at 4:03PM ESTSpacer @JerseyRudy I really thought so in the beginning but the lack of character development really was a huge flaw for Maya. I'm glad you enjoyed the performance, but to me Chastain overacted in many parts. There was no subtlety to illustrate was was going on underneath at all, especially as the film wore on. Just wooden machinations to move the plot along. Boring interpretation.
January 14, 2013 at 4:16PM ESTRicardo
January 14, 2013 at 6:03PM EST Reply to CommentAm I the only one who thought they were not great? Some bits were amusing (Amy and Clooney for example), some were not. With the exception of the James Cameron bit, I didn't laugh at anything. It's not entirely their fault since the structure of the thing doesn't have that much leeway.
Ricky Gervais second outing was much better imo.
Guest
January 14, 2013 at 8:21PM EST Reply to CommentWhy could Lena Dunham not walk? Injury or just bad shoes and sore feet? My gosh - a little poise would have been great.
Also - thought Jen Lawrence crowing about her win over Meryl Streep was classless and a poor start to what was otherwise a solid acceptance speech.
Anne Hathaway for best acceptance speech for sure.
Kb That Meryl line was a joke from "First Wives Club," FYI.
January 14, 2013 at 9:29PM ESTWriterross I've walked like that at many a bar mitzvah. It was the shoes.
January 15, 2013 at 3:35AM ESTAnother Guest And shoes that weren't even visible under her long dress. Did she think she looked *good* in that get-up? If she's just succumbing to Hollywood styling pressures, she needs to get a better stylist, one who ensures her dress is flattering and actually fits, and who gets her to break in shoes before tromping around on camera.
January 15, 2013 at 12:23PM ESTDezbot Never saw First Wives Club. I thought the tone of it came off a little mean, though.
January 15, 2013 at 1:22PM ESTDavid
January 14, 2013 at 10:51PM EST Reply to CommentAlan, you're not giving MacFarlane near enough credit. Also, enough with schadenfreude, because Fey and Poehler were good does not automatically mean MacFarlane will be bad. You saw the Oscar nominations, maybe?
WriterRoss
January 15, 2013 at 6:56AM EST Reply to CommentAnother Globes question, one I am not sure Mr. Sepinwall can answer: Isn't this event the annual "Jack Nicholson Sits at Head Table and Mugs Jack Faces for the Camera" program? I didn't see him. Did you?
Another Guest Maybe he was co-starring in "The Flu" with Meryl Streep.
January 15, 2013 at 12:24PM ESTAnother Guest
January 15, 2013 at 12:28PM EST Reply to Comment>
Another beautiful thing about that joke, however, is that it doesn't come out and say that marriage to Cameron must be torture, even though that's the inference most listeners obviously drew.
Quentin Tarantino "Star of all my sexual nightmares" was a good line, too. Loved Glenn Close playing drunk as though she were having an epileptic fit.