Review: 'The Office' - 'Junior Salesman/Vandalism': Lowering the boom

Is it a mistake to make Brian the boom mic operator into a character at this point?

<p>Jenna Fischer, Rainn Wilson and Clark Duke in &quot;The Office.&quot;</p>

Jenna Fischer, Rainn Wilson and Clark Duke in "The Office."

Credit: NBC

Are you a fan of The Office?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

A review of last night's "The Office" double-feature coming up just as soon as I redact my resume...

When last week's episode introduced Chris Diamantopoulos as Brian the friendly boom mic operator, I was intrigued with the idea of getting more information about this Dunder-Mifflin documentary — who's behind it, where/when will it be shown, will it just be focusing on Jim and Pam (as suggested in the season premiere), etc. — and using that big emotional moment as a catalyst to put the crew on camera.

The one aspect of it that I was not interested in was, unfortunately, the one angle Greg Daniels seems to have decided to pursue: that Brian has fallen in love with Pam, and that Pam perhaps has feelings for him as well.

Like the documentary crew, I'm still watching at this point to see how Jim and Pam turn out. And I've been more than okay with the tension created by Jim's new life in Philly. But the last thing the show needs is one more love triangle involving these two. Daniels has said in interviews that he likes the idea that the camera crew was always there for Jim and Pam's little inside jokes and intimate moments, and that as a result someone like Brian might have felt the same intimacy and bond. But though I'm intrigued by the nature of the documentary itself, I couldn't care less about the personality or life experience of the documentarians at this late stage of the game. There's probably a single episode to be told about that story — like "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead," or that issue of Grant Morrison's "The Invisibles" told entirely from the point of view of a henchman who appeared in a couple of panels in an earlier issue — but it doesn't work as an ongoing thing after all this time.

As for the rest of these two episodes, the first one gave us Mose, which was great, and then it gave us Badger from "Breaking Bad" as imitation Mose (a role Matt Jones played in the Dwight spin-off pilot, which we'll see as an "Office" episode later this season), which mainly served as a reminder of what a strange and wonderful character the writers gave Mike Schur to play way back when. It felt, like so many Andy-centric stories, like it was a Michael Scott idea retrofitted to another character, though I at least appreciated that most of Dwight's "friends" (Troy from "The Deposition," James Urbaniak's Rolf from "Company Picnic," Beth Grant's babysitter/girlfriend from "Dinner Party") were people we'd met before. "Vandalism," meanwhile, allowed Kevin to be briefly wise, and also revisited the idea that our beloved Jim can be kind of a self-centered jerk much of the time. And both episodes made good use of Clark Duke, who's been a good addition to the cast this year when he's been around.

So there were some decent ideas and gags sprinkled through those two episodes, but I'm not especially looking forward to Brian's inevitable return, pledge of love, etc.

What did everybody else think?

Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Alan Sepinwall Recaps & Reviews

View By Show »

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • 1
  • 2
Next 113 Comments
  • Default-avatar

    Dr. Gross

    I've been terrified of the love triangle plot line every since they introduced Brian. Hopefully they don't head too far down that road, although last night was not encouraging.

    Aside from that, I also enjoyed Dwight's weirdo friends, including the generally hilarious (and unmentioned) Chris Gethard. On a related note, I highly recommend Gethard's book, A Bad Idea I'm About to Do. But only if you enjoy laughing.

    February 1, 2013 at 9:16AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Col Bat Guano I was really hoping that the introduction of Brian last week was just an entry into the nature of the documentary and not the start of a lame love triangle story. The realistic fight made me hopeful that Daniels knew what he was doing, but these two episodes really let me down in that regard.

      Dwight's interviews were filled with good stuff, from Mose to Badger and it was good to see functional Kevin. Please writers, there are only 10 episodes left. Don't waste them with Brian/Pam melodrama that will be resolved with an emotional reunion of Jim and Pam we will see coming a mile away.

      February 1, 2013 at 1:22PM EST
    • Pompador_talkback_profile

      youngjt80 I don't think they're gonna go the love triangle route. Pam is probably the shows most likeable character so I don't think they'd blow her up before the end.

      February 1, 2013 at 7:03PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Darkdoug I agree with YoungJT80. In the first place, I didn't get the same read on that line in the beginning that Alan did - was the unseen crew member talking to JUST Jim & Pam or was he refering to the whole office group? "You" is an unfortunately un-specific word when applied in such a situation. And like that case, it seems that people are weighing too much on the side of one possible meaning of Jim's comment. I think (and hope, now that Alan has brought up the good point about what a bad idea the romance would be at this late stage) that the shot was only supposed to suggest that Jim's words about Clark applied to the documentary crew as well - that Brian had become as much the work-family member that Dwight everyone else had become. To read a romantic connotation into Jim's words is absurd, because that means he is saying that he'd be fine with Dwight Jr striking up a workplace triangle with Pam (or Dwight Sr, for that matter), but he'd only have a problem with some wierdo paintball friend of Dwight's being the new Jim to old Jim's Roy.

      I think we're overthinking that, and this is just a way to bring along the documentary crew. Otherwise, one might be tempted to ask "Why should we give a damn about these new people introduced in the last season?" This episode and last weeks were prempting that question by pointing out that Jim, Pam, and even to a lesser extent Meredith, have come to know these guys as part of the office scene. As Brian stated, he's been here the whole time (it could, after all, have been a rotating crew of cameramen, sound techs, boom mic guys, and so on all this time), and has worked with them almost as long as most of the others, and certainly longer than Andy, Nellie or Daryl. Jim's speech and the accompanying shot of Brian laughing along with Pam and Clark, was, I believe, intended to reinforce that.

      Or Alan's right, and the office writers have not only dropped the ball, they've let it roll across the street and won't be getting it back any time soon.

      February 2, 2013 at 12:51AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Col Bat Guano So, the tender glance, the tap on the head with the mike, his pledge to always be there to support her and saving her from the marauding warehouse worker were just a way to introduce the documentary crew? I have my doubts.

      February 2, 2013 at 3:27AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Shannon

    I hate the way the Brian story seems to be going. After nearly 9 years, why is he suddenly screwing up left and right because of his feelings for Pam? It doesn't really make sense, and I truly have no interest in a third party romantic storyline for this couple.

    It's much more interesting, in my opinion, to have them work through this Philly situation together; Jim needs to be more straightforward and honest with Pam about what he wants and what it means for their family, and Pam needs to come to terms with her insecurities and fear of change. That right there is plenty of fodder for their journey this season; the lovesick boom operator is just an added distraction that takes away from heart of the story.

    February 1, 2013 at 9:41AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Nancy Shannon, I totally agree. There are enough issues and tension at this stage of the game for Jim and Pam to work through without the trite introduction of Brian. I just feel like love triangles are just lazy writing. The only good moment in the second episode was Kevin calling the Senator out.

      February 1, 2013 at 3:09PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Scott M.

    If they show a flashback of brian and pam having an intimate moment during that period she was single, i would feel slightly better about the situation. only showing their relationship at this point is a waste

    February 1, 2013 at 9:47AM EST Reply to Comment
    • They could use a lot of moments from the past. Pam's best "talking head" moment ever was after Season 2's "Boys and Girls" when she broke down crying at the realization that her current life trajectory with Roy was not headed toward any of her dreams. That would be a perfect point to go back to to establish a pre-Jim moment between Pam and Brian to justify any lingering feelings between them now.

      February 1, 2013 at 10:05AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      jess I didn't even think of that. You are so right on there, Scott.

      February 1, 2013 at 10:44AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Shannon I think you're right that if they want this relationship to seem realistic, they should go back and establish past moments. That said, I don't particularly want them to spend any time on this relationship.

      February 1, 2013 at 11:22AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      bottl4 I really hope they don't do this, I don't want previous seasons being retconned to shoehorn in a character that as far as we're concerned, has sprung up out of the blue.

      February 4, 2013 at 10:34AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Mike

    There were two episodes? My DVR said 1600 Penn was on after the first episode. Guess I'm going to have to Hulu it.

    February 1, 2013 at 9:50AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Tomato Good luck with that. We're rooting for you.

      February 3, 2013 at 11:43AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Rover537

    I definitely agree. These were actually two solid, funny episodes -- except for the Brian parts. Hey, at least he got fired, so there's no reason for him to be back on the show, right? (Wishful thinking.)

    And I love that they brought back Troy, who I don't remember from The Deposition but do remember as Ryan's friend/troll from Night Out.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:07AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    dougs

    I just have to applaud the "Invisibles" reference. Added a bit of brightness to my day.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:11AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Banksy_talkback_profile

      alphabet Indeed, 10 points!

      February 1, 2013 at 6:45PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Luke

    I think Andy's disappearance has given The Office more freedom (literally & figuratively), and it has paid off in spades. I say "Whatever" to the doc crew being used to leverage a happy ending in the Jim & Pam arc. Looking purely at the coupling dynamic, there are two more pressing issues anyway.

    The part I'm over-the-moon about is the in-mates running the asylum, with enriched parts for Erin, Darryl, Meredith's hair, and Dwight. The opening segment is still laugh-out-loud funny 3 out of every 5 times, and the comedy on the fringes and in the background, the stuff you need to watch a second time to pick up, is still at apex level. We never showed up Thursday night for a love story anyway, that just happened.

    As to the Jim/Pam/Boom Guy triangle, what did we expect? If they were going to create any amount of drama to have our happy ending feel earned, it had to be credible. The constant presence of the doc crew lends itself to credibility. The more pressing issues are that all of a sudden, Angela's character is just alright being a beard and inevitably Erin and Andy are going to end up together when he's done nothing to merit it. For Angela, they've always shown it's more important to her to look complete than to actually be it. Here, her implicit compliance as the State Senator's beard takes that concept and adds complexity. Now it's not just "Show for the sake of Show," but that she realizes she's doing it and is doing it anyway, which I'm finding interesting. Then there's Erin: whether it's New Jim or nothing, both are better options for Erin. Please surprise us here Office, and set her free.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:19AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Col Bat Guano There was no need for a triangle to create drama. The impending (possible?) move to Philly was doing just fine. Throwing some random guy we know nothing about with 10-12 episodes left is just a lazy way of making us unsure.

      February 1, 2013 at 1:26PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Jaxemer11 Absolutely agree on Andy. He was always the weakest link on the show. Trying to replace Michael with Andy was the worst mistake the show ever made.

      February 1, 2013 at 11:00PM EST
    • Pic_talkback_profile

      forg +1 on Andy's disappearance making the show little better

      February 3, 2013 at 8:39AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    InvisibleJay

    What I'm surprised not many people have touched on is how in the grand scheme of things their fight was part of what every relationship endures. Granted I realize it's over a significant life event (Jim's risky job venture). But divorce or adultery because of a fight? Nobody would be married if that were true for everyone. It's embarrassing to suggest it when they've otherwise been painted as madly in love.

    So this feels far too contrived. They should have built it up better if they wanted us to believe the relationship was in peril.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:25AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Bob Yes, thank you. The first time they ever show Pam and Jim fight and it immediately leads to fidelity questions? Give me a break.

      February 1, 2013 at 11:05AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Col Bat Guano Yes, excellent point. That fight was the most realistic thing they've done in years and then they went and ruined with Brian Boomguy.

      February 1, 2013 at 1:27PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Jaxemer11 It would be absolutely absurd for the show to split up Pam and Jim over that petty little fight. It would ruin the whole show for me.

      What I can see happening (and what I think will be the direction they eventually go) is that Brian will do something to express his love for Pam, and Pam will shoot him down quickly and say she loves Jim. If it goes anything beyond that, it would be a travesty.

      February 1, 2013 at 11:05PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Darkdoug On the other hand, Pam kind of has a history of emotional affairs with sympathetic co-workers, when the person with whom she has a committed relationship is not readily available, or is disappointing her because he's something of a late bloomer.

      Just kidding. I don't think there's anything going on there, but only because I don't believe that's what was intended to be conveyed by those scenes - I think they were just trying to tell us why we should care now that the doc crew are coming out from behind the curtain at the end now. We should care because Jim's ending soliloquy applies to them as well as to Clark or whoever would be taking his place.

      But character-wise, I wouldn't call Pam's straying all that implausible.

      February 2, 2013 at 12:57AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      kronicfatigue Okay, I'm catching up on this week's episodes today (Sunday) and I needed to make sure someone voiced my opinion in this thread. Thank you invisible jay.

      February 3, 2013 at 11:02AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Sweetness

    One can only hope that Brian is the real Scranton Strangler, and that he has been strangling away to impress Pam.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:36AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Guest Haha...too funny

      February 3, 2013 at 6:14PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Jess

    I feel like they've changed Jim's character in one episode. Alan mentioned that they revisited this idea, but I don't remember it ever showing. His personality doesn't seem like a slob, he uses fabric softener and such. I thought that was weird.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:42AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Jim I've known a lot of guys (mostly, some women, mostly guys) who decide in their mid-thirties (and later) they really wanna be in their mid-twenties again, and a lot times, kids and spouses become inconvenient, and Jim's revisit of bachelor life, he and Pam having different ideas about their family's future are good and believable conflicts, but it does seem like too much too fast with Jim being such a jerk. I did like that even as Jim and Darryl fight as room mates, they click as a work team.

      And since I once loved this show and never much cared for Andy or Ed Helms, its' even more amazing how much better this show is now that they aren't trying to shoehorn the actor and the character in to Steve Carrell's place.

      And frenemies/dsyfunctional office spouses from accounting realizing that they're both victims of the State Senator, and their slow witted child sticking up for them? Nice touch. And Dwight's parade of friends was great, right up to the group photo from paintball.

      February 1, 2013 at 11:34AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      bottl4 There was a reference in Chair Model to both Jim and Pam being slobs. "Maybe I'll move in with my boyfirend, he's kind of a slob too."

      February 4, 2013 at 10:36AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    John

    These may have been my two least favorite episodes in the entire run of The Office. The writers have cleary have no idea who these characters are and what made fans like them in the first place. I have been sticking with this show out of habit/nostalgia, and I figured I would definitely stick with it through the end of this season. Tonight's episodes make me really wonder if I will.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:45AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Luke You will. Anyone who posts on message boards below episode reviews will. The threat of you not finishing is less credible than the idea of a documentary crew following a random paper company sales office for 9 years.

      February 1, 2013 at 10:48AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      John Touche...

      ps. Making broad generalizations about internet commenters - do you still read paper copies of newspapers and did you access this site with AOL (maybe using a free trial disc)?

      February 1, 2013 at 12:33PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Old Galoo
      The UP series documentaries have followed the same group of people for about fifty years now. An office for 9 years isn't necessarily absurd. It is perhaps absurd that 9 years of footage have not been released as of yet. It would have to be some sort of mini-series released periodically.

      This is why the British version was a bit more credible. 2 seasons, 12 total episodes, probably a year or a bit more covered. Then the documentary comes out. Makes sense.

      February 1, 2013 at 12:33PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Aaron John, I'm not sure what the point of your sarcasm is at the end of your comment, or if you bothered re-reading it before you posted it to make sure it at least made sense, but I think Luke's point was that if you are invested enough in the show to read an episode review and comment on the show's direction, you're probably too invested not to finish the series.

      February 1, 2013 at 1:32PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      John Aaron, "You will. Anyone who posts on message boards below episode reviews will" while not bothering me, I read as a broad generalization of internet commenters. Is people saying on the internet that they didn't like a show/episode and then never returning to that show again that uncommon? Hell, THIS SHOW (by ratings) is evidence that the phenomena exists. I just responded with a (probably more clever in my head than in reality) generalization of people who make generalizations about internet commenters.

      February 1, 2013 at 1:56PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Pedestrienne @OLD GALOO - In particular, the British Office has the character of Tim discussing to some degree the impact the original documentary has on his life. So the material airs, and in the Christmas specials it's mentioned.

      February 1, 2013 at 8:59PM EST
    • Desktop1_talkback_profile

      The Noble Robot No, your response was defensive. But Luke is right, you will keep watching. I've done it for tons of shows I started "hating" but still watched to the end. Like BSG, Lost, and others.

      It's okay, you're allowed to criticize the shows you watch, and you're even allowed to stop liking them, and as you say, plenty of people have stopped watching, but if you care enough about it to talk about it online, then you're in it for at least another 12 weeks (or however long the show has left).

      The only reason you'd give up on the show now is specifically to prove Luke wrong. You just spoke with hyperbole, and Luke called you out on it, no big deal. No reason to get upset.

      February 2, 2013 at 6:37PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    jake

    Here's what I find most strange about the Brian/Pam storyline: we are supposedly viewing a documentary. We are to imagine that everything we see during the show has been filmed, edited, and put together by the producers of this documentary. Why, after nine years, would the makers of the documentary start to include themselves as characters (especially including as a character someone they fired for interacting too much with the subjects of the documentary)? This is the sort of storyline that jars the whole world that the creators of this show have established.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:58AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Cheat2Lose There's actually a precedent for this that happened on the Real World. I believe it was one of the earlier seasons, when the Real World was closer to a real documentary. One of the directors had a relationship with one of the cast members, got caught, got fired, then became part of the show when then continued to date.

      February 1, 2013 at 1:20PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Aaron Actually, we are watching them film the documentary. This is not the final project, we merely get to see snippets of what the film crew is documenting at the time.

      February 1, 2013 at 1:29PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Col Bat Guano I'm with Jake on this one. Why wouldn't they just edit out those scenes with Brian interfering?

      February 1, 2013 at 1:30PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Robin Perhaps documentary is the wrong word to use with The Office at this point. I know that we were introduced to this world as it being part of a "documentary," but it has really evolved into more of a reality show. And viewed as an on-going reality show rather than a finite documentary I think there is real-TV precedent for the documentary team to become part of the story. I'm thinking that during Season 5 of The Deadliest Catch some members of the film crew on the Cornelia Maria were shown talking to the boat's crew members and reacting to certain things that happened on the boat. I believe these things were shown because they made things that happened later on make more sense and/or show that EVERYONE on the boat was affected. So, probably to most of our dismay, the fact that they are showing Brian and these scenes means that he is going to show up again in a much more dramatic fashion.

      February 1, 2013 at 3:26PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      MC JQ Seattle was one of the last seasons of The Real World that I watched. The fact that it is now considered an early season makes me feel really old.

      February 1, 2013 at 4:28PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      rcade The inclusion of Brian scenes in the documentary suggests that his role in Jim and Pam's life becomes important enough to break the fourth wall over.

      February 8, 2013 at 9:45AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    evolution1085

    The office is falling into the same trap the OC always did, thinking that drama between a married couple can't be engaging enough on its own unless there's an interloper 3rd party involved. Jim and Pam's relationship has been the bedrock of reality the show has been built around, and just adding Brian in at the end to try and heighten drama that already resonates because it's REAL... makes the whole thing cheap and soapy.

    February 1, 2013 at 11:11AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      rugman11 That's the thing that makes me so angry about this storyline. They were creating plenty of drama and tension just from separating Jim and Pam. I mean, they could have just done the same storyline but, instead of Pam turning to Brian, she realizes she has nobody to turn to (since they don't seem to have much of a life outside work and family). Why can't explore what it's like when the one person you can always depend on to be there is suddenly unavailable? That's an interesting story, and it doesn't require a faux-love triangle to tell.

      I just know how this is going to go down, though. Next week's episode Athlead will be saved. Then, in two episodes, Pam will visit Jim in Philly, see him living the bachelor life and get pissed off that she's basically a single mom at this point. She'll run back to Scranton and call Brian and then they'll go from there. Hopefully she'll just shoot him down immediately, because I just don't want this to drag on.

      February 1, 2013 at 12:13PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Haik Mendelovich

    The first half of this episode prove, I think, that the madness of Dwight and Company makes for far funnier fare than grafting Michael Scott's insecurities unto preppy Andy ever did.

    Why did they not greenlight Schrute Farms again?

    February 1, 2013 at 11:14AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Aaron As much as I would have loved for The Farm to become a real thing, I think Dwight is so funny because of how ridiculous his interactions with the office staff/the outside world are. We'd probably get bored watching him be weird with his even weirder family

      February 1, 2013 at 1:35PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Ian

    I'm not actually against the Brian plot. It is far from the worst thing that has been done with Pam over the years. The way it's being executed is awkward, though.

    I get the outrage, though. I stopped being invested in Jim and Pam some time in season four, but I have friends who continue to, even today. Their favorite episode is Niagara, they had knives out for Cathy and Jordan and Danny Cordray, and they never found any of Jim or Pam's antics over the years as anything other than utterly charming. They were livid at the Brian twist. One of my friends joked that it was like Lost, if the smoke monster and Jacob were Nikki and Paolo, and that just seemed to make them more angry.

    February 1, 2013 at 11:26AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      nic919 I don't have a problem with Jim and Pam fighting and having a hard time dealing with the new job in a different city. That tension felt like a normal marriage. I think the reason why most people don't like the intrusion of Brian the sound guy is that instead of making Jim and Pam have to talk to each other about why this job in Philly is affecting their marriage, the writers have jammed in at the last minute this third party and ultimately it will be more about potential adultery than about Jim and Pam's relationship.
      Besides, we have already seen Jim pine away for Pam when she was with Roy. Is this simply another version of that? and if so what does that say about Pam, who drifts to another guy every time her current relationship falls flat. If we did not know that they were aiming for the happy ending, then the writers need to be bold and have Pam leave Jim for Brian at the end, and suggest that she is just a bit of a flake. But they won't do that.

      February 1, 2013 at 11:59AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Col Bat Guano It's not the fact that they are introducing tension into their relationship. It's that they are doing it in the laziest, most sitcommy fashion. With such limited time, it can only be done in shorthand which means there will be no depth to it when it reaches its preordained conclusion.

      February 1, 2013 at 1:34PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Careful Ned Agree with NIC919...I really liked the normal marriage feel of the argument last week until Brian entered and I knew instantly where that was headed...I hate when TV producers feel like they have to add in some love triangle or adultery possibility to make the show more sexy or interesting or whatever.

      Sort of reminds me of last season of HIMYM where the show seemed only capable of generating plot movement through some sort of relationship drama that would come from nowhere (DATING YOUR THERAPIST! CHEATING! FAKE PREGNANCY! PROPOSAL! RUNAWAY BRIDE!) instead of letting stories evolve naturally and realistically.

      Jim and Pam's initial fight (at least arguably) made sense under what we know about their characters through years of watching them. Brian just comes out of nowhere and doesn't really fit in the history of the show

      February 1, 2013 at 6:05PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Haik Mendelovich @Col Bat Guano:

      "...when it reaches its preordained conclusion."

      Jim and Pam commit ritual seppuku, and Ceecee is adopted by Dwight? :)

      February 2, 2013 at 10:18AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Col Bat Guano @Haik Well, that wasn't exactly what I was thinking, but you never know!

      February 2, 2013 at 6:45PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    thejoshbaker

    This sound guy storyline is the worst in the show's history, bar none. Absolutely awful.

    February 1, 2013 at 11:34AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Chris What he said ^

      February 1, 2013 at 12:11PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Matt

    Brian feels like Oliver from The O.C. in the worst way possible.

    February 1, 2013 at 12:41PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Scottpilgrim_talkback_profile

    Cody

    I don't think the Brian story would bother me so much if he wasn't suddenly failing at the job he's been doing for 9 years. His first appearance was fine. It was a tense moment, and Pam addressed him directly. But now, he's suddenly poking her in the head with his boom mic during her interviews, deliberately inserting himself into her story? That just makes for poor storytelling. If Pam kept coming to him (like she did in the cold open), while he tried to stay hidden and do his job, up until a point where the documentary had to start addressing this person Pam has become friends with over the years and was just now reaching out to, that could potentially work. Brian butting in for no reason just makes the character less sympathetic.

    February 1, 2013 at 12:56PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Alexis His failing at his job is intentional, as he finally has an opening with Jim being away in Philly. So far, there hasn't been anything romantic expressed on Pam's part, so I really have no idea why people are freaking out. Brian said he didn't want to put himself where he doesn't belong, which implied he had feelings. But he didn't act on them. And neither did Pam. We all remember the last time this happened, on Casino Night, and Pam went for it with Jim. She didn't with Brian.

      This triangle is a good storyline in my opinion. I don't think anything will become of Brian and Pam, but his character is used to show how much Pam and Jim's relationship has changed. And in a very natural way- they are married, have kids, have job priorities, and while still in love, the honeymoon is definitely over. Jim loves his freedom away from married/family life, more than he knows. I think he will eventually learn that another man has feelings for his wife and, though they are unreturned, it will make him appreciate what he has so carelessly pushed to the back burner.


      I mean, that chick that was into Jim and went down to Tallahassee with everyone never went anywhere. Why should we expect Pam to cheat on Jim? Brian is likely being used to show that there is a rift between Jim and Pam, one that can be exploited by an outsider, but it won't go far. Pam is still dedicated to Jim, it's Jim that needs a reminder of his priorities. And what better way to do that than with another man?

      February 1, 2013 at 2:29PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Blaze Domingo " he finally has an opening with Jim being away in Philly."

      Um, didn't he have more of an opening when Jim was in Stanford? And Pam wasn't a married mother of two?

      February 1, 2013 at 2:50PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Col Bat Guano You don't need a third party to show the strains on a relationship when one is living 2-3 hours away. There are much better ways of making this point than randomly throwing some guy we've just met into the mix. It's lazy and, given that we all know Pam isn't going to cheat, pointless.

      February 1, 2013 at 4:29PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      rcade Brian is getting a divorce. That probably explains the timing of why he's now romantically infatuated in Pam and wasn't earlier.

      Jim and Pam were couple friends with Brian and his wife.

      February 8, 2013 at 9:50AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    jtbradley

    I really hope the writers say, "F-you" to the audience and have Pam leave Jim at the end. Pam is not a good person. Go back and watch the first two seasons as we're rooting for her to cheat on her fiance. This is who she is. Karen was a much better fit for Jim but the writers made us hate her with no basis since they wanted us invested in Pam. Pam can't handle communicating when things don't go well so she latches on to the first guy to give her a smirk. First Jim, now Brian.

    February 1, 2013 at 1:26PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Col Bat Guano There was a good reason we were rooting against Roy those first two seasons. I hated Karen for much the same reason I hate the Brian story. There wasn't enough character development to actually care about her and so it became obvious that she was just there to stall the Jim/Pam reconciliation. Brian is serving the exact same sloppy purpose.

      February 1, 2013 at 1:38PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Aaron I don't think the writers so much wanted the fans to hope that Pam would cheat on Roy, but rather that she realize how poor her relationship was with him, how much Jim cared about her, and how much she clearly cared about Jim back. Their love/relationship is really the only storyline that's continued throughout the whole show.

      February 1, 2013 at 1:40PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Ben Kabak

    Showing the ppl behind the documentary is dumb. Having ANOTHER love triangle when we know they arent breaking up Jim and Pam is ridiculous.

    February 1, 2013 at 2:51PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      filaphresh What is with the writers of this show? You can have natural tension in a marriage without any temptation to cheat. Why, after what's her name, the new employee who wanted to watch basketball with Jim on the trip to Florida, would they try another temptation to cheat from a character who isn't a character?

      February 1, 2013 at 6:40PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    GrammaK

    I'm ready to bail now- I really really don't like where they're hinting about going with the Brian story. I thought I would stick with the show until the bitter end, but now... I just don't know.

    February 1, 2013 at 2:54PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Mahmoud Fayed See you back here next week!

      February 1, 2013 at 10:04PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Jaxemer11 They haven't done anything wrong yet. Don't overreact before you even know where the storyline is going. I think it is more likely than not that Pam shoots Brian down as soon as he tries to make any move on her. Its likely the writers are using this to show just how close Pam and Jim are.

      February 1, 2013 at 11:16PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      GrammaK Oh, I'll be here next week, Mahmoud, because I love the recaps and comments. Jaxemer11,I don't like where the storyline has already gone and I don't trust the writers as much as I used to. I hope you're right

      February 4, 2013 at 9:49AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    LJ

    Unforgivably stupid. The second Brian was shown I knew the story was going this way 1) because he was not a woman and was a relatively put together dude 2) because I lost confidence in the writers around season the end of season 4. I didn't watch the last season but I've come the last season out of nostalgia.

    Few obvious things:

    1). There's zero, zero reason why Pam would turn towards Brian. Its stupid and contrived. I don't care if Pam and Jim are fine, this Brian obstacle is unnecessary. Can't the writers not see it? Its so obviously bad, mind boggling choke

    2) Stop showing Brian. Its like the documentary has turned into a documentary of the documentary. Dumb, unexplainable

    3) Stop having every guy fall in love with Pam. Seriously, come on, enough is enough.

    4) F off to Daniels and the writers. Its one think to decline in quality, its another to shit on the one thing that still was working: Pam and Jim's relationship.

    5) I choose to remember the first 3 seasons of the Office, one of the greatest comedies on American TV. The last few season are just a crappy sitcom.

    February 1, 2013 at 4:35PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jim

    The whole Brian thing could work if there was even the slightest chance that Pam and Jim would split up at the end...but we all know there's no way in hell that'll happen - this show is determined to give everyone their happy ending. Because of that, the Brian storyline is just a giant waste of everyone's time.

    February 1, 2013 at 4:39PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    mhbazzi

    Completely agree w all those posting disappointment, anger, and confusion at the Brian/Pam story line. Yes it feels forced and lame. Drama for no good purpose. I am TERRIFIED that this story line, if it continues, will make me HATE all the previous seasons of the office. I will not be able to watch the early season reruns without knowing that Pam is really a terrible person bc one day in the future she carries on an extra-marital relationship w another man that is disrespectful to her marriage with Jim, to Jim personally, and to herself. Shame on them for assassinating her character. Adultery, by definition, makes you a liar. Dont do that to Pam. Even if she is not happy and wants a divorce, then give her one and let her pursue Brian in an honorable way, not while still married and committed to another man.

    February 1, 2013 at 5:35PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Anthony Completely agree!!!! After I watched these 2 episodes it left such a bad taste in my mouth that I couldn't watch the older episodes that came on later that night

      February 2, 2013 at 11:17AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    snowlarbear

    i would be ok with the Brian story if they weren't so in your face about it. like the cold open with him talking to pam/meredith, his "accidental" boom mic drop on Pam's head. it's been 8+ years without that stuff, it's annoying to introduce that now.

    also, i feel like Plop and Erin's psuedo-relationship, which I am not a fan of, is designed to show us that Jim's courtship of Pam was slightly creepy. it was just a matter of perspective.

    February 1, 2013 at 8:17PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    srpad

    The Office has been quiet having itself a really solid final season.
    Re: The Farm. I assumed *this* was the episode that used The Farm footage. I figured some of the cut away gags were clips filmed for that show.

    February 1, 2013 at 8:55PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Mike.G

    Oddly enough, I feel like the last 3-4 episodes have offered some of the strongest episodes since Season 6 of the show.

    Like you, I don't feel especially invested in Brian one way or the other, and would agree that I hope the show doesn't go down the path of Pam flirting with the idea of an affair. However, one of the good things that has come out of Brian is that after an entire season (I would argue more like 2 1/2 seasons) where the only things that worked well were episodic gags (e.g. Michael Scarn), the show is returning to some of the core elements that made it work so well for such a long time.

    Meanwhile, a lot of the little things they've done have worked. The cavalcade of bad friends/relatives interviewing for Dwight's job, Kevin standing up for Angela/Oscar when neither one of them will stand up for themselves, even the Jim/Darryl roommate story...all had heart. No, it's not Dickensian storytelling, but then The Office at its peak never was that anyway. At it's best, The Office was a show that did a great job of taking an ensemble and having them work well together as a unit.

    Taking Andy out of the equation seems to have given the show liberty to go back to the ensemble and away from having Ed Helms as the show's enter. It was never Ed Helms' fault, but Andy was never going to replace Michael as the comedic touchpoint of the show (Andy was always best as a supporting character). Perhaps the show is missing a true lead at the moment, but with this experienced cast that never seemed to matter. A lot of shows limp to the finish line, but The Office has an opportunity to go out on a really high note if they play to the strengths of the ensemble, which, of course, definitely means avoiding an asinine Jim/Pam/Brian triangle.

    February 1, 2013 at 9:47PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Visitor Kevin was the highlight of that episode.

      February 3, 2013 at 6:29PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    John

    Yeah, it's a mistake for all the reasons others have mentioned. On the bright side, Badger was one of Dwight's candidates. It's too bad they couldn't bring in Skinny Pete to interview also.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:20PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    John

    Yeah, it's a mistake for all the reasons others have mentioned. On the bright side, Badger was one of Dwight's candidates. It's too bad they couldn't bring in Skinny Pete to interview also.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:20PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jaxemer11

    Not excited about the Brian/Pam love triangle. That is just awful. Otherwise, I liked these episodes pretty well. Especially the portrait of Angela above the fireplace (that was frightening).

    Jim has turned into a real dick, but surprisingly ... I find it pretty believable. He always saw himself as better than everyone in Scranton (including Pam) and now that he has move up in the world, it has gone to his head big time. I will hate it if he and Pam split up. Hopefully he gets humbled at some point.

    February 1, 2013 at 10:50PM EST Reply to Comment
  • 1
  • 2
Next 113 Comments

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Around the Web