Review: 'The Americans' - 'Duty and Honor': Strangers in the night
Phillip teams with an ex-lover for a mission, while Stan enjoys an evening out
Matthew Rhys and Marina Squerciati in "The Americans."
Are you a fan of The Americans?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
A review of tonight's "The Americans" coming up just as soon as I have 16 pairs of legwarmers...
"I'm ready now, Mischa." -Irina
It's one thing to tell us that Phillip and Elizabeth have given up any chance at a normal life in service to their mission. It's quite another thing to give face to that sacrifice, as "Duty and Honor" does mostly well(*) in introducing us to Irina, the woman Phillip loved before he was assigned to his fake marriage to Elizabeth.
(*) I say "mostly" only because I spent parts of the episode distracted by my attempt to calculate the trajectory of Irina's career, the odds that both halves of this couple would wind up as sleeper agents — if, indeed, that's what Irina is, since it wasn't entirely clear. (She could be based in Montreal as "Ann," or she could just have a flawless accent but have been flown in for this specific mission.) If they're roughly the same age and she was really pregnant with Phillip's son — as opposed to using that as a lie to re-strengthen their bond and gain a companion in her new fugitive lifestyle — what are the odds she catches up to the position Phillip is in right now, more or less? Not saying it's not possible, just that the details were sketchier than they maybe needed to be, given how important the story was to Phillip's past, present and future.
Irina's arrival came at a particularly bad time for Phillip. Pre-mole hunt, he probably regrets their parting but feels 100 percent on board with his marriage to Elizabeth. Post-mole hunt, though, he's being reminded again of the difference between spouses and partners(**), and it's at least tempting to consider abandoning life in Falls Church — and his very real children — to go back to his one true love, rather than return to the current tension and feelings of betrayal with Elizabeth.
(**) Making Stan's wife's envy of the Jennings marriage particularly ironic. As bad as she and Stan have it, they at least chose each other way back when.
This was a great showcase for Matthew Rhys, but what made the story work was that it wasn't simply a reunion between ex-lovers, but another mission. Phillip has to contemplate his past, present and future while he's in the middle of framing a man for rape, and he and Irina get a very painful reminder of the life they have currently chosen when Phillip has to coldly beat her up as part of the frame job. This is why Irina wants out, and why Phillip has been questioning things for so long, and I appreciate how "The Americans" always frames these meditations on marriage within a spy context (or, if you prefer, how it always adds a marital element to a spy story).
Phillip returns from this business trip — and I loved how the episode's opening scenes framed it in the context of a spouse acting as if their partner's work trip is a glamorous vacation — determined to make things work, as is Elizabeth. But they begin this new phase of their marriage the way spies should: with more lies, since Phillip doesn't let on any of what happened with Irina in New York. Those details may never come out, but it's a reminder that no matter what either party feels, or how hard they work at it, they're trying to patch together a structure built on a rotten foundation.
Another great episode of what continues to be a sterling debut season.
Some other thoughts:
* Hands up, everyone else who thought that, at certain angles, actress Marina Squerciati (as Irina/Ann) looked exactly like Lizzy Caplan?
* While Phillip's up in New York reconnecting with Irina/Ann, Elizabeth gets to tie together several recent threads, as she hooks up with part of the cell that was led by the man she shot in the head two weeks ago, while she and Granny have their first encounter since Elizabeth turned her face into hamburger. Margo Martindale's delivery of "Better luck next time" (in response to Elizabeth's "I'm sorry I didn't kill you. That's my apology.") should, mathematically, be enough to secure her next Emmy right now, shouldn't it?
* Meanwhile, Stan and Nina finally go to bed together, after Chris prods Stan into having sex to ease his troubled mind. It's interesting to consider the post-coital scene — which includes Nina explaining, "You Americans think everything is black and white; for us, everything is grey" — in light of what Special Agent in Charge John-Boy tells Stan later. Yes, it's in John-Boy's best interests to keep her in place as an asset, and to tell handler Stan whatever he has to do placate him, but Nina is a spy of sorts, even if a low-level one, and she's done very well at her new job as a double agent. Who's to say she's the poor unfortunate innocent Stan has made her out to be, rather than someone ruthless and self-preservationist enough to present herself that way to the do-gooder FBI agent?
What did everybody else think?
Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
News From Our Partners
-
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day Ten: The big wrap-up, including Jim Jarmusch's fantastic vampire film
Hear This: “Second Best” reflects a pivotal moment all serious bands face
Watch This: The wages and the fear remain high in William Friedkin’s Sorcerer
-
Babble.com: 8 Parenting Lessons To Learn From 'Arrested Development'
WATCH: New 'Arrested' Clip You Probably Haven't Seen
What Is Up With Rob Lowe's Face? The Actor On His Crazy 'Candelabra' Role
-
Baz Luhrmann Passed on Directing 'Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone'
Someone Just Paid $1.5 Million to Sit Next to Leonardo DiCaprio in Space
Tim Curry Is Fine After Suffering a Massive Stroke: Report
-
Demi Lovato Is Thrilled That Her Voice Is Finally Being Heard on Radio [Video]
One Direction's Niall Horan Spends the Night With UK TV Star Louise Thompson
Kelly Clarkson Denies 'American Idol' Judging Gig
-
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - Does Someone Have to Go?: Work Sucks.... If You Are On This Show
The Telefile - Save Me: Lightning Strikes NBC
-
Weekly Ketchup: Fox and Marvel Both Courting Quicksilver for Comic Blockbusters
Critics Consensus: Fast & Furious 6 is Certified Fresh
Red Carpet Photos with Vin Diesel, Michelle Rodriguez, Gina Carano and More
-
'Star Wars: Episode VI': What's Its Legacy... And Its Future?
'Arrested Development' Season Four: Eight Things To Remember
'Fast & Furious 6': The Reviews Are In!
-
Mega Man X Trailer: The Blue Bomber Busts His Way to Wii U Next Week
The Wrap Up: Charlie Sheen Gets a New Name For 'Machete Kills'
New 'Man of Steel' TV Spot: "Why Did You Send Me Here?"
Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching
Latest Posts
-
Steven Soderbergh biopic about Liberace is HBO's best movie in yearsFriday, May 24, 2013
-
Will gets lost in a case, and Lecter tries to protect Abigail HobbsThursday, May 23, 2013
-
Announcing this summer's blog rewatch seriesThursday, May 23, 2013
-
The Dunphys and Pritchetts head to Florida for the funeral of Phil's momThursday, May 23, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup- 1
- 2
Next 92 CommentsMark
March 13, 2013 at 11:06PM EST Reply to CommentGranny killed me with the better luck next time line, loved it. I enjoyed the whole elaborate plot to make it look like the Polish guy raped Ann.
I'm hoping Nina is working for bigger people, and really is a spy. Really enjoying this first season, a show I'm trying to watch live instead of on DVR.
Lee When Martindale said "Better luck next time," I said aloud, "There's a little Mags Bennett creeping in there."
March 14, 2013 at 4:04PM EST
Lee... me too! I thought she might present Elizabeth a little "Apple Pie" as a peace offering.
March 14, 2013 at 6:25PM ESThunter2012 I don’t believe that Nina is a spy of any sort other than being an informant. She is to me exactly what she appears to be: An embassy secretary blackmailed by the FBI Counter Intelligence Unit because they use the fact that she was breaking Soviet law by exchanging caviar for high end stereo equipment and American currency and smuggling those items in the Soviet Diplomatic baggage to sell back home in the USSR. At best she is a “spy” by being dragooned into it. Agent Gadd doesn’t seem to want to acknowledge that and the FBI responsibility and so make her disposable.
March 15, 2013 at 10:02AM ESTAs an audience IMHO we have seen too much of her in her private moments to think she is working for someone in the KGB. How would giving the codes to the FBI help the KGB when Vasili who is running operations in Washington know nothing about it and when the FBI change the codes so the KGB couldn’t track who was following their operatives and more immediately Vasili to meet and reassure the source, the KGB was forced to have Elizabeth kill a lucrative source on Missile Defense technology intelligence? No evidence that Nina was feeding the FBI disinformation. What’s the upside?
What I am concerned about is that she would use the fact that she slept with Stan against him. I believe in that way she is indeed a self preservationist survivor. I am sure she wants out from under Stan’s thumb. Also now that Stan’s wife have subtly told Elizabeth her fear that Stan maybe having an affair and his son is frustrated that dad is hardly ever home Elizabeth and/or Philip would get it in their heads to follow Stan around to hold against him and so discover Nina and so notify The Center about her.
prettok
March 13, 2013 at 11:08PM EST Reply to CommentNOOOOOO!!! Do NOT kill Nina off! Not after tonite.
Also, I am sure Irina was on a special side assignment. Her appeal to Philip was probably another KGB loyalty test. Her showing up in D.C. so soon after the molehunt seems too much of a coincidence.
Jonas.Left A thought I had about Irina and Phillip sleeping together is that if it she was testing him its possible Granny might eventually use the information against the Jennings to drive a rift between them.
March 14, 2013 at 4:49AM ESTHoosOnFirst I agree with both your points, Prettok, but note that Phillip and Irina were in New York for the travel convention, not DC.
March 14, 2013 at 8:26AM ESTNeeraj Phillip failed the KGB's loyalty test by not turning in the defector. I think Nina's fate (live or die into second season) will probably depend on the movie career of the actress playing her (or that's what seems to happen in other shows anyway).
March 21, 2013 at 4:44PM ESTJeff G
March 13, 2013 at 11:12PM EST Reply to CommentFantastic episode, although the backstory with Irina, their earlier relationship, and her career was a bit too rushed/murky. It's tough given how much story they have to tell, so I understand, but it weakened the emotional impact.
FictionIsntReal "Phillip" tears up her picture in the first (or maybe second) episode.
March 14, 2013 at 12:04AM ESTbmfc1
March 13, 2013 at 11:17PM EST Reply to CommentMinor comment: Nina said "white and black", not the reverse.
Sterling Mallory Archer I notieced that too, thought it was strange.
March 14, 2013 at 8:53AM ESTJerseyRudy She did something similar with an expression a few episodes ago, which Stan found endearing.
March 14, 2013 at 9:24AM ESTsteve Did anyone else notice that the kids were playing chess when Phil got home and asked if anyone missed him? Very white and black I thought.
March 14, 2013 at 10:52AM ESTCrhistoph The other endearing Nina phrasing was "everyone at the KGB is running around like 'cut off chickens'" in reference to the Reagan assassination attempt in episode 4.
March 14, 2013 at 12:09PM EST(I've been trying to think of that for the best part of an hour and signed up here to tell you!)
HISLOCAL I thought the Polish guy was bragging about how many carriages they have in Poland, but he was actually talking about "courageous" men and women.
March 15, 2013 at 11:14AM ESTLynn
March 15, 2013 at 6:41PM ESTRe: "White & Black". To me they were just pointing out Nina's unfamiliarity with American colloquialisms, as compared to Phillip & Elizabeth, who'd been coached to the nth degree before they were ever allowed to set foot on US soil.
hampshi
March 13, 2013 at 11:18PM EST Reply to CommentI suspect Nina is playing Stan just like she played Vasili, probably as a method of self-protect when the Russians find out she's the mole. If she plays double agent, it may just convince them not to kill her. Will bet money that the Jennings are going to ice her before the season is out, though.
HISLOCAL I totally get Stan sleeping with her, but he's proven himself to be such a sharp agent, that if he doesn't at least consider that she's sleeping with him out of self-preservation rather than lust, then it's a disservice to his character.
March 15, 2013 at 11:16AM ESTFumi
March 13, 2013 at 11:18PM EST Reply to CommentI'm pretty sure that Irina was trying to lure Philip away with that fake son photo... However, I'm with you that Nina probably a lot less innocent than Stan makes her out to be... All I kept screaming at the TV during the post-coital scene was, " Stan! Do you remember what happened to the last guy Nina slept with? Please don't let that guy be you!" BTW it's Matthew Rhys, not Philip.
hunter2012 Well Stan should remember what happened to Visili since it was entirely his idea to get rid of him and he made the incriminating calls to Visili.
March 16, 2013 at 5:05AM ESTthenightstalker
March 13, 2013 at 11:20PM EST Reply to CommentThis was a great showcase for Phillip Rhys, but what made the story work was that it wasn't simply a reunion between ex-lovers, but another mission.
I think you mean Matthew Rhys. :)
Ellen M.
March 13, 2013 at 11:33PM EST Reply to CommentThis was a great episode for Matthew Rhys - talk about emotional contortions. Aside from seeing Irina after twenty years (boy she looked a little young) but also to find out that he possibly has another son and then not to know whether this is really true or not - it's a wonder that he can function at all.
I'm not sure these people can truly have sincere relationships given how much they have to lie to everyone all the time. But I am very glad they didn't use Irina for more than this episode. Philip and Elizabeth already have enough complexity in their relationship to worry about as it is.
"Better luck next time" - How can such a sweet looking woman like that be so evil and menacing. She's just amazing.
John Boy was on to something. I think Nina did "eat Stan for breakfast." I can't wait until we see Stan's backstory about when he was undercover. That experience has taken a toll on his emotional life - most obviously on his marriage. He must have had to do something pretty bad - aside from lying and betraying a bunch of people. Whatever it was - he can't get past it.
This has become my favorite show on right now (Justified is a close second). I hope they can maintain this level of story telling over a good number of seasons.
SlackerInc I too thought Irina looks quite young. So I did what I usually do when I think the character's age seems suspect: I tried to look up the actress's age. But boy has she buried that information well--it is not available on IMDb, Wikipedia, or her website, and the latter does not list dates of the plays she was in, when she graduated college, etc.
March 22, 2013 at 11:54AM ESTCasibeth
March 13, 2013 at 11:33PM EST Reply to CommentWhat's the consensus on the boy in the photo? Was Irina's lack of response confirmation that he doesn't exist? I think I'd find it more interesting from a character standpoint if Phillip really did have a kid out there he'd likely never be able to meet. More tragic.
milaxx A part of me wonders if it wasn't yet another loyalty test
March 13, 2013 at 11:36PM ESTMatt_H If he does exist, I'm assuming he's in Russia still, correct? Would she really just run away and disappear without her son, especially if her son was still well within reach of people who could punish him for her actions? I don't think he was real. It was either another loyalty test or a ploy to reconnect with Phillip.
March 14, 2013 at 8:57AM ESTmilaxx Since Irina said he wanted to join the army before university if definitely gave the impression that said son was in Russia, but I leaning towards believing the son wasn't real.
March 14, 2013 at 9:18AM ESTDaveMB If Irina is telling the truth, their son may be in for some very unpleasant service in Afghanistan.
March 16, 2013 at 5:32PM ESTmilaxx
March 13, 2013 at 11:34PM EST Reply to CommentLove Richard Thomas as CIA boss. His role is a small one, but every week he gets that one good line. This week it was, "Has she had you for breakfast, Stan?"
Suzanne I love him in this too. He's doing a stellar job as a very tough boss. I really like how his face has matured. A long way from John Boy.
March 14, 2013 at 2:18PM ESThunter2012 To be clear Special Agent Gadd, played by Richard Thomas, is the supervisor of a part of FBI Conterintelligence, not the CIA.
March 16, 2013 at 5:27AM ESTstepliana
March 13, 2013 at 11:51PM EST Reply to CommentWas Matthew Rhys' Russian dubbed by another actor, or by him in ADR? I feel like it's the former but couldn't be sure.
Ed I thought the same thing, particularly when he meets her in the park in Russia.
March 14, 2013 at 8:39PM ESTJerseyRudy
March 13, 2013 at 11:56PM EST Reply to CommentHuge time jump from last week's episode which took place in April 1981. This episode took place during Christmas time in 1981 (the Reagan "Spirit of Solidarity" speech that they showed took place on December 23). Surprising that they would jump that far ahead, but it shows how deep the wounds were from last week's episode that they still seemed raw 8 months later.
GRubi That doesn't necessarily mean that they jumped ahead. I don't think that this show is as serious with their historical facts as Mad Men is.
March 14, 2013 at 12:19AM ESTJerseyRudy They have been up to now. Last episode they made sure the radio broadcast of the actual Orioles-Royals game from April 12, 1981 was on in the background.
March 14, 2013 at 12:24AM ESTAndrewL After Philip staged the mugging, right before the commercial break you could see the Verizon logo on the front of a truck. The Verizon name and logo didn't exist until 2000.
March 14, 2013 at 12:55AM ESTGreg The timeline does give me pause. Not impossible, and not accidental, but interesting. Especially after the first five episodes covered fewer than 4 months.
March 14, 2013 at 2:04AM ESTClearly it's winter now (snowing in NYC; snow on ground in DC area). Clearly it was spring in the last episode. So given the specificity of the Reagan speech on TV, I assume that they are indeed intending this to be 8 months later. (no one is mentioning Christmas, though.)
This means that the new tensions in Philip and Elizabeth's marriage have been ongoing for more than half a year at this point. In the final scene, they do seem to refer to their torture as an event from the past.
I'm curious how the daughter's relationship has developed with Stan's son (if at all). They've known each other for about a year now.
Presumably the two families are significantly closer now (Elizabeth and the kids coming over for random dinners without Philip).
Nina has now been working as a spy far longer since her boss's arrest than before, and is probably far more seasoned (lending fuel to Alan's suspicions).
However, it seems like this is Elizabeth's first meeting with "Granny" (still pretty beat up looking) since the incident? Or does she usually meet with Philip? Or has she been away recuperating?
Also, Elizabeth refers to the new asset as having worked for his murdered superior "for the last year and a half" even if the man has been dead for 8 months? And they are only now getting around to nailing down his network? Or has the mole hunt and suspicion thrown everything out of whack for many months?
Also, it looked to me as though an attempt was made to obscure the Verizon logo, although now that it's been pointed out it's distracting.
Jonas.Left Wow. That speech by Reagan was on my fifth birthday.
March 14, 2013 at 4:37AM ESTCablePirate @andrewL: There are many little anachronisms in the show, mostly outside and relating to automobiles or technology. In recent episodes I've seen a post-2000s-era SUV whiz by in the background, a 1987-1989 Chrysler in traffic (could tell by the taillights), and of course the DC park police officers using much-more-modern style radios than were around in the very early 1980s. It *is* a cable-channel TV show, after all, and in light of that, the few holes in their period decor are to be expected.
March 14, 2013 at 11:30AM ESTabby536 How is that possible when Mags is still visibly battered?
March 14, 2013 at 2:33PM ESTberkowit28 @cablepirate: The exemplar for period details, Mad Men, is also a cable-channel TV show. The fact that The Americans is one, too, shouldn't be a reason for not getting it right. It's not as if network TV, with its money, is does any better - it usually does worse. Premium cable - HBO - probably has the best expectations, and can fulfill them. But it's Mad Men - on basic cable AMC - that does it best. The Americans is not bad, but could do a bit better.
March 14, 2013 at 10:07PM ESThunter2012 I think they took dramatic license and moved up Regan’s Solidarity speech to April-assuming if that really was the Reagan’s address to the nation on 12/23/81, no offense to “Jerseyrudy”.
March 16, 2013 at 9:34AM ESTAt any case other things say it is still late April 81: When Elizabeth took Philip to the train station he asks “If you want to talk about it?” I don’t think Elizabeth and Philip would avoid the subject for eight months. I think it happened last week show time.
The bruising on Claudia’s face still looked relatively fresh, way too fresh if there was a eight month interval.
It is conceivable it could still be cold enough in mid April ’81 to snow. I was turning 18 during that time but I have long forgotten if it was still cold in late April but a semi freakish cold front from Canada-where Irina is from ironically if my speculation is right-could’ve flowed in at that time. There have been late April snow falls before in New York.
There is no indication of it being the Christmas season of any kind, not one Christmas ornament. The show runners simply wouldn’t leave that out.
Also they would have to skip over some major developments like Pope John Paul II will have an assassination attempt against him-similar to Reagan's in fact-in May 1981 and that is a historical point I don't think the producers will ignore it any more than they could Reagan's attempted assassination. There were suspicions in real life that the KGB was behind the assassination attempt because of his anti Soviet stance so that is an obvious story line they could use in the show.
So from all of that I believe it is still late April 1981 and it was simply unseasonably cold; the big event of John Paul II not being covered 1981; Claudia’s bruising, And the fact the Jennings are still irritated by the torture leaves me to believe that it was dramatic license that the showrunners moved Reagan’s address up in time since it was topical to the episode.
Oh and Ann (Irina) and Philip were assigned to the same mission so it wasn’t some chance meeting or anything she arranged by her independently, but she probably was probably was told who she be working with ahead of time and so took the picture of her son with her, which was probably against regulations because it would be hard for her to explain why would she have a picture of a Russian soldier on her if she was caught by the Americans or Canadians. She better have a good cover story for it.
@Greg:
As per my explanation above I think only about two months have passed between the show starting in mid February of 1981 to as I estimate late April of 1981 so I think only two months have passed not four. And yes there has been late April snow fall in the North East before.
@AndrewL:Yes the truck did have a Verizon logo on it. “Ma Bell”, that is AT&T won’t be broken up into regional local calling companies for another two years, in mid 1983. Then the “Baby Bell”, as the broken up bits of AT&T were known, for the New York, New Jersey area would be called “Bell Atlantic”, then another name I have forgotten and then Verizon sometime in the late 1990s.
@Jonas.Left:
Your birthday is on 12/23? I feel for you to have your birthday so close to Christmas. Your parents must have been thrilled to save $$$ on presents. : - )
@Berkowit 28:
As mentioned I think if that is really the address taped on December 23, 1981 I believe the showrunners moved it up for dramatic license.
DrAtomic More inconsistencies with the show's timeline: The Soviets are shown repeatedly freaking out over US advances in ballistic missile defenses (this is also the focus of the classified information being passed along by the now dead US defense contractor). Someone even mentioned the Strategic Defense Initiative Organization a few episodes ago.
March 17, 2013 at 7:11PM ESTTrouble is, Reagan didn't announce the Strategic Defense Initiative until March 23, 1983, more than two years after the events being depicted (and that announcement, at the end of an otherwise unmemorable speech about military spending, caught all but his closest aides by surprise). The formation of the SDIO was later still. Until then, the Reagan administration had no plans to develop let alone deploy technology capable of making, in Reagan's words, Soviet nuclear weapons "impotent and obsolete."
I understand the need for dramatic license, but when they're going to such trouble to get the costumes, decor, and hairdos right, you'd think they could stick more closely to the historical facts, especially for something that's going to be so central to the plot.
Jonas.Left HUNTER2012 My parents always made a point of not skimping on birthday presents.
March 17, 2013 at 7:38PM ESThunter2012 @DrAtomic:
March 18, 2013 at 9:17AM ESTActually the depiction of the United States working on space based missle defense in 1981 is quite realistic. It is not widely known to the public but space based anti balistic missle syst3ems were concieved of and worked on a few years before the Reagan administration came to power. Here is a wikipedia article on it (The brackets with the numbers in them like “[28]” are the sources cites the wikipedia article uses if you go to the actual page):
Strategic Defense Initiative:
[edit]
“Initial impetus
George Shultz, Secretary of State under Reagan, suggests that a 1967 lecture by physicist Edward Teller was an important precursor, where Teller talked about the idea of defending against nuclear missiles by using nuclear explosives. Held at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Reagan attended it shortly after becoming the governor of California, and Teller recounted that Reagan listened intently and asked many questions (though he did not making any pro or con arguments).[27]
In 1979, Ronald Reagan visited the NORAD command base under Cheyenne Mountain where he was first introduced to the extensive tracking and detection systems extending throughout the world and into space. However, he was struck by their comments that while they could track the attack down to the individual targets, there was nothing one could do to stop it. Reagan felt that in the event of an attack this would place the president in a terrible position between immediate counterattack or attempting to absorb the attack and maintain an upper hand in the post-attack era. Shultz suggests that this feeling of helplessness, coupled with the defensive ideas proposed by Teller a decade earlier, combined to form the impetus of the SDI.[28] In the fall of 1979, at Reagan's request, Lieutenant General Daniel O. Graham conceived a concept he called the High Frontier, an idea of strategic defense using ground- and space-based weapons theoretically possible because of emerging technologies. It was designed to replace the doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction, a doctrine that Reagan and his aides described as a suicide pact.[29]
The initial focus of the strategic defense initiative was a nuclear explosion-powered X-ray laser designed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory by a scientist named Peter L. Hagelstein[30] who worked with a team called 'O Group', doing much of the work in the late 1970s and early 1980s. O Group was headed by physicist Lowell Wood, a protégé and friend of Edward Teller, the "father of the hydrogen bomb".
Ronald Reagan was told of Hagelstein's breakthrough by Teller in 1983, which prompted Reagan's March 23, 1983, "Star Wars" speech.”
[edit]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative
So parts of the government had been working on something like the Stratigic Defense Initiative-“High Frontier” as it was called-during the Carter Administration on a small scale long before President Reagan anounced it to the public on March 23, 1983. Reagan even explored the idea for it before he was President back in 1979 and even had the idea in his head as far back in 1967.
Therefore in “The Americans” the Soviets knowing about something like SDI and taking measures to collect information and technology about it is realistic even in 1981, two full years before the American public was informed about it and Reagan made it stated policy and expanded the program greatly.
Oh and in another one of those coincidences in which TV and movie plots coincide with reality it is in the news that President Obama is strengthening our anti ballistic missle defenses on the west coast to counter a future threat from North Korea. I wonder how many North Korean sleeper agents if any are in America? :-)
guest five months is too long. it was long enough for their handler Grandma to heal a little bit but still be messed up a little (unless those are scars).
March 21, 2013 at 4:58PM ESTDonBoy
March 14, 2013 at 12:07AM EST Reply to CommentI loved how retro that farewell was -- in a train station with sad quiet classical music.
GRubi
March 14, 2013 at 12:18AM EST Reply to CommentI gotta say, other than maybe the eyes, I'm not seeing any resemblance between Squerciati and Caplan. Though it would be extremely interesting to see Caplan try to do a role like this.
cp It's interesting to see Caplan do anything.
March 14, 2013 at 12:27AM EST@asbrahma Reminded me a little of Rashida Jones. Plus her name was Ann.
March 14, 2013 at 2:35AM ESTNow imagining "Ann Perkins!" as a Soviet sleeper agent.
eddie willers
March 15, 2013 at 12:57AM ESTFunny how people perceive how other people look.
Every time I see Dallas Roberts ("Milton" on The Walking Dead and "Mile" on Rubicon) I say, "Man...he looks just like John Ritter", people say..."yeah....I guess...a little".
nietparkeren I think of John Ritter every time I see Dallas Roberts, also!
March 17, 2013 at 10:50AM ESTToosoon Definitely the poor/not dead man's Ritter.
March 21, 2013 at 12:40AM ESTSamInMpls
March 14, 2013 at 1:25AM EST Reply to CommentAfter watching this and her run on Justified, I am kind of pissed that Margo Martindale doesn't have her own show. If she was a man she would at the very least be getting the sort of opportunities that Chi McBride had with Boston Public, Human Target and Golden Boy.
I agree that the lack of clarity in Irina's back story was a little distracting but what a payoff! The ambiguity in the train station scene was excellent and was itself the payoff. We don't know who was most vulnerable in that moment and the beautiful part of it is that there are a half a dozen plausible scenarios that could be developed in future episodes.
My only concern with this episode was that Stan acted on his desire to sleep with Nina seemed a little premature. I like how the possibility that Nina is compromising Stan dovetailed with the dynamic between Phillip and Irina but I would have liked to see him begin to confide in her before they went there. On some level Stan has to know that Nina slept with him to protect herself just as she did with Vasili. There is more between Stan and Nina than Stan's inability to reconnect with his wife or his desire for intimacy with a woman who can identify with his own experience as an undercover agent.
Longshot prediction: Stan will get turned upside down by Nina and in order to save his own ass will end up cashing in the trust he's built up with John Boy to intentionally expose her as the mole to save another asset. Stan is slowly losing his soul and there is no way that Nina is gets her happy ending.
Kyle7
March 14, 2013 at 2:18AM EST Reply to CommentI actually thought that Squerciati looks like Cilian Murphy's sister from certain angles.
PopzillaJoe
March 14, 2013 at 2:26AM EST Reply to CommentThat last bullet point about Nina is very savvy viewing and intriguing. This could be one of those moments that in seeing this world through the perspective of a central character -- in this case Stan -- the audience could have been jaded, misjudging her, along with him. Almost like when we realize we had been misunderstanding Adam during s1 of HBO's Girls. This is a great device if used properly. There are two basic requirements, both of which The Americans have set up brilliantly, if the plan is indeed to reveal her as much more of a proactive, savvy agent of her own will. 1. You mustn't see through the smoke screen to the true nature of the personality too early. If that happens it just feels like the show is misunderstanding its character or pulling a cheap trick. Until I read this post, I hadn't considered her as anything other than sweet and vulnerable so they got me here. BUT this also has to be balanced with: 2. Once the reveal is made about the misjudgement, you should be able to go back to the episodes -- literally or mentally -- and make sense of this newly exposed persona. The old, forehead smacking, how did I miss this, the pieces were right in front of me!? And again, if this is the route they choose (which I'm becoming increasingly convinced of and hopeful for) the show nails this criterion as well. Nina's tone has loosely been a victim-in-waiting who is being pushed by everyone around her. In reality and fact however, she has displayed sharp wits, competence, and stealth. And that vague victim vibe we are currently buying at face value could very well stem from some combination of her playing that role AND/OR seeing the whole situation from the male/agent perspective. I love this possibility!
Regarding Irina, I feel like the possibility of them meeting in this fashion could give one pause, BUT the episode was somewhat vague in the origin story, so I was able to see a scenario where it wouldn't be that big of a contrivance or stretch. And as it was vague, perhaps its something that will get additional explanation and attention later in the season or series. And they say, HA, and you thought this was a contrivance, when really THIS was going on all along. I could see this show pulling that off. Similar to Breaking Bad, this show is just so tightly integrated and credible with little to no fat, very well tied up loose ends, characters intertwined at every possible step, and balanced in proportions in terms of motivation and consequence. So, I'm willing to ignore this totally, as either a rare exception OR something they are purposely playing coy with.
Last thought: Margo Martindale is great in this role, but it has a tad bit of novelty feel for me, still. And I'd have to think on other contenders in the supporting actress drama runnings, but with the saturation of talent on tv, I'd have to imagine that there are performances with deeper characterization and emotion. Brody's wife in Homeland comes to mind in short order. I'm not saying Martindale isn't in the running or shouldn't be - quite the contrary. I'm just saying it strikes me as brave to all-but-guarentee a nomination at this point, let alone a victory! She may be in contention, but I certainly don't think she has gotten to the 'its hers to lose' point. I'd prefer to think of her as a very affecting and likable underdog performance in the category, where I'd understand if she pulled an upset nomination and win. Just my thoughts!
Some Guy Martindale would be in the Guest Actress category, not Supporting, which makes her nomination/win more likely (especially since the Emmy's generally love to give the same people awards over and over again).
March 14, 2013 at 4:27AM ESTcrackd Looking back at Nina's behavior from her POV she did not exactly come across as a savvy spy.
March 15, 2013 at 5:54AM ESTWhen she had to photograph some docs , she seemed way too inexperienced and nervous to be a calculated agent.
PopzillaJoe That's true, she did seem nervous. I'm not saying that she is spy material or anything necessarily, just saying that she may be more calculating than we OR Stan see her.
March 15, 2013 at 5:40PM ESTRight, I don't know why Guest Actress hadn't crossed my mind. I suppose that does make sense. At the time, I guess I was thinking she was too involved for that consideration, but that is probably not the case. And if that is her slot, I guess she would indeed be the front runner. Thanks for the clarification, SOME GUY!
Elevation
March 14, 2013 at 3:06AM EST Reply to CommentTheir kids need to go to boarding school.
floretbroccoli Maybe to the one where Skylar White wants to send Junior.
March 14, 2013 at 9:42AM ESTCablePirate I disagree! Running dangerous missions of intrigue and then coming home to play suburban mom-and-pop to the kids is a big part of what makes this show so damned interesting! Plus, without the kids, we wouldn't have had Philip donning the cheesy moustache and stomping the child-molesting skinhead in the first episode.
March 14, 2013 at 11:35AM ESTPlus the kids got to play the part of vulnerable hitchhikers last episode, which was great!
Jonas.Left
March 14, 2013 at 4:44AM EST Reply to CommentThe Jennings daughter was spectacularly annoying in this episode. I wish her brother had asked her if it was incorrigible when he saved her from the psycho she was drinking beer with down by the lake.
Trilby They're starting to remind me of Brody's kids. Maybe they should go have a playdate with Brody's kids for a while.
March 14, 2013 at 9:29AM ESTJonas.Left Eventually, Brody's daughter won me over and her relationship with her father became very poignant and even crucial to the plot in the season one finale. The Jennings kids are really the only weak spot for this show and these past two episodes made it blatant.
March 14, 2013 at 2:39PM ESTSlackerInc Well, I like the kids. I have a gifted 13-year-old, so to me her throwing around big words that way was very familiar and amusing. I think she's a realistic type of teenager, but a type we don't normally see on TV; so to me it is refreshing.
March 22, 2013 at 12:05PM ESTvelocityknown
March 14, 2013 at 9:24AM EST Reply to CommentLoved the episode, loving the show overall, but I thought the Russian-language ADR in parts of the flashbacks was hilariously bad.
FasciNathan
March 14, 2013 at 9:49AM EST Reply to CommentFantastic episode. I think Irina told Phillip about their "son" to fill him with the rage he needed to slap her for the mission. Upon entering that scene, he immediately tends to her wounds from the previous "attack." Given their onscreen tenderness and history it's difficult to imagine him willfully slapping her without some provocation, even if it were his duty.
Regarding the son's existence, I think it's inconsequential whether he is real or not. The fact the son was said to be such a devout Russian soldier made him feel like yet another Soviet propaganda tool. Yet the pathos he evoked made him seem very real. In the end, I think he's emblematic of the show's perspective on 'The Truth" as a murky, ever-shifting state of being.
LIGHT What. Phillip's has killed, harmed and slept with countless people for the KGB. A couple of slaps and punches is well within his comfort zone.
March 17, 2013 at 3:04AM ESThunter2012 @Light:
March 20, 2013 at 7:33PM ESTNot against someone he cares for and at least loved once.
SlackerInc So Irina did not actually live in Montréal? My wife and I were trying to decide whether the son was perhaps a Canadian soldier. We thought there was no way she would risk bringing a photo of a Soviet soldier along with her on an espionage mission.
March 22, 2013 at 12:07PM ESTChristina
March 14, 2013 at 9:54AM EST Reply to CommentWhen I saw the promo pictures I definitely thought "oh wow Lizzy Caplan is in The Americans! Awesome!"
clivia_gardens
March 14, 2013 at 10:01AM EST Reply to CommentLast week they try to break Phillip with a beating. This week they bring in his ex-girl friend. Why didn't that raise alarm bells from the start? Yes, at the end he questions the "son" story, but never her desire to get away. Because he too desires to get away. So, if she was there in part to test him, it's obvious he's ready to fall.
Alan's review questions the sincerity of Nina but not the appearance of this old girl friend. My question - is this a plot device or bad writing/ timing?
Robert
March 14, 2013 at 10:43AM EST Reply to CommentJust want to record that for the first time ever I precisely predicted Alan's ". . .as soon as I . . " intro.
Good episode of a good show.
Gazer
March 14, 2013 at 11:18AM EST Reply to CommentI'm enjoying this show a lot. I still wouldn't put it in the same tier as the best tv shows like Mad Men and Breaking Bad but I do think it's as good as, if not better, than Homeland. Which maybe isn't saying much since I think Homeland became almost unwatchable in the second half of the second season. The hubs doesn't like The Ams as much as I do but he's willing to watch and it's an easy way to pass the time on a late winter evening.
Some random thoughts: Stan would be immediately removed as Nina's runner IRL after he made it clear that he has feelings for her. Much too risky to have him remain as her primary contact. It will be interesting to see what they do with her storyline. Whether or not she's a double agent, she is a thief and, as John Boy so astutely pointed out, not an ingenue. Anyone dealing with her had better be very careful.
I don't understand why the Jennings have children at all. Why would the Soviets have allowed this or ordered them to reproduce? Especially when the children were babies, this would have severely hampered Phillip and Elizabeth's availability and productivity. I suppose that having kids gives them more opportunities to integrate into an American community through schools, sports, etc, but the drawbacks would appear to outweight the benefits by a long shot. And don't those kids ever wonder where their parents are? I loved how when Phillip returns from NY and asks where Elizabeth is neither of the kids even bother to answer.
Margo Martindale seems to appear in a lot of shows in small roles. She had a brief part in one episode of Smash this season and she has an ongoing role as Betty Draper's mother-in-law on Mad Men. She is absolutely terrifying in that role but she basically kills it no matter what she's asked to do.
justjoan123 The children make good cover. The prototypical American family has children -- to be young and childless looks less homogeneous in Suburbia.
March 14, 2013 at 12:50PM ESTAlisa Pamela Dunlap is the actress who portrays Pauline Francis (Henry's mother and Betty's mother-in-law) on "Mad Men."
March 14, 2013 at 5:36PM ESTEric827 Are childless couples really that rare?
March 19, 2013 at 12:50PM ESTHaving kids might make Phillip and Elizabeth a little more homogeneous, but I don't see how that's enough of a positive to balance out all the negative implications of them having children.
lawdog
March 14, 2013 at 12:53PM EST Reply to CommentI really like Richard Thomas in his role too. Its a shame that actors in 70's and 80's TV got so type cast. He seems like a very good actor and no one under 40 would even get the John-Boy reference.
lee
March 14, 2013 at 1:36PM EST Reply to CommentJust noticed last night that the characters have the same names as the queen of England and her husband. I'd be surprised if that was accidental though I can't see any relevance to it - maybe just for fun or maybe it really was a fluke.
MM first really blew me away in Justified - I like her here but I would love even more of her; she is simply delish and divine.
I'm still finding it all somewhat ham fisted. I like intensity - but, I like it as it is done in Justified when it is balanced by so much wit and humor but just enough.
I always like/need some humor in these kinds of shows or it's just too much of too much.
molly
March 14, 2013 at 2:50PM EST Reply to CommentI didn't see Lizzy Kaplan until you mentioned it - to me she looks like a cross btwn Emmy Rossum and Moira Kelly
SlackerInc Great call! Or to go back to the '80s, how about Jennifer Beals and Sean Young?
March 22, 2013 at 12:17PM ESTCaptain Cook
March 14, 2013 at 3:01PM EST Reply to CommentActually she didn't say black and white as we would but white and black as someone who wasn't as familiar with the language
Josephsdad
March 14, 2013 at 5:22PM EST Reply to CommentIf the son is real, he's just the right age to fight in Afghanistan. The worst the Soviets could do to him would be to grant his wishes.
- 1
- 2
Next 92 Comments