Review: 'Parenthood' - 'Keep On Rowing': Bald is beautiful

Kristina gets a haircut, Crosby gets a houseguest and everything gets messy between Julia and Victor

<p>Monica Potter as Kristina in &quot;Parenthood.&quot;</p>

Monica Potter as Kristina in "Parenthood."

Credit: NBC

Are you a fan of Parenthood?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

A review of last night's "Parenthood" coming up just as soon as my butcher looks at me like I have leprosy...

"Parenthood" ended 2012 as one of my 10 favorite shows of the year, and it began 2013(*) with an episode largely reminding me of why I put it there: one filled with laughter and pain and sweetness and, of course, tears.(**)

(*) Ordinarily, the broadcast networks don't air original episodes of shows on New Year's Day. In this case, though, NBC wants to finish airing this season of "Parenthood" (there are four more episodes) quickly so they can get season 2 of "Smash" into this timeslot by early February. On the one hand, that kind of treatment suggests a bunch of network executives not overly invested in a show developed under a previous regime (and very invested in "Smash," which was Bob Greenblatt's pet project even before he came to NBC). On the other, if it turns out the modest popularity of "Smash" last year was largely dependent on having "The Voice" as its lead-in, then within a couple of months, Greenblatt and company may be looking at what "Parenthood" does in that timeslot (not great, but stable and much less problematic than other parts of the schedule) versus what "Smash" is doing in it, and recognize that they'd be wise to stick with Team Braverman another year. 

(**) As Fienberg noted on our best of 2012 podcast, declaring when you started crying during an episode of "Parenthood" has almost turned into a competitive Twitter sport. 

After the 12-hanky events of the Christmas episode, this week's cancer story dialed things back just a bit, while still giving Monica Potter and Peter Krause their usual showcases. The mix of emotions washing over Potter's face  — exhilaration, fear, regret — as Kristina shaved her head(***) was superb, and the whole argument between Adam and Kristina was messy in that great "Parenthood" way. He is trying to do something for her when he gets the hooker wig, but he's also doing it for himself. I liked that the story essentially reached its climax midway through the episode when Kristina showed up with the limo and the red wig, and that everything after was an entertaining coda. Ryan Hansen got to do Ryan Hansen things as Luke the salesman, and even Kristina being too tired was a mild disappointment; for Adam the gesture was more important than the trip to Funky Town.

(***) Potter did not shave her own head, and while the bald cap she wore was seamless, there's no getting around the way her skull looked bigger than it should have because her real hair was tucked underneath the prosthetic. I can understand why Potter might be reticent to shave her head a few weeks before she might be looking for more work (whether just a hiatus gig or something more long-term in the event of non-renewal), and usually I just accept the illusion of a bald cap in this circumstance. But because the emotions on "Parenthood" (like "Friday Night Lights" before it) are so raw and honest, the artifice feels more distracting than it might on almost any other show. I'm moved by Kristina's circumstance, but I'm also thinking about the makeup job.

With Kristina's situation being ever-so-slightly lighter, the real heaviness this week came from Julia and Joel's corner of the series. The show has splashed around a bit in the emotional issues surrounding Victor's adoption, but this was a dive into deep, dark water. Even months later, Victor can't think of Julia as his "real" Mom, and he carries deep emotional scars from life with his biological mother and in foster care. So Julia and Joel are walking on eggshells around him and letting him bend the rules Sydney has to live by, which leads to one verbal explosion from her mom ("Shut up and eat it, please") and one physical one from her brother, who sends an aluminum bat flying over her head. More disturbing than the bat incident, though, was the way Julia referred to Sydney as "our child" when discussing the incident with Joel — "our child," as if Victor is just a temporary, troublemaking houseguest. Julia caught herself seconds after she said it, but this is not a situation that's going to be easily stabilized.

As usual, the show tried to balance the serious stories with some more relaxed ones involving the other siblings. Of those, I preferred Crosby's freak-out about Renee moving to Sarah's ongoing romantic angst involving Hank and Mark. Jasmine's not one of my favorite characters on the show, but Crosby does love her, he did marry her, and that means he now has responsibilities to her family, too. It's a complicated situation, and one that Renee clearly understood as she tried to broker a peace with her son-in-law upon arrival.

(Also? Dax Shepard had a nice comic touch directing the various Crosby/Adam and Crosby/Adam/Amber scenes at The Luncheonette.)

At this point, unfortunately, I think I have Sarah romance fatigue. As good as Lauren Graham is, as good as Ray Romano is, and even as good as the two of them are together, it feels like the rest of the show made an evolutionary leap forward this season, while Sarah's still stuck back in season 2 or 3, hitting the same beats over and over. I understand why she might have some abandonment issues with Hank after Mark broke off the engagement, but I no longer care about which guy Sarah's with or how well it's going.

Let me make the first reminder of 2013 that this blog's spoiler policy means no talking about the previews for the next episode — and also warn you that it may be difficult for me to review said episode in a timely fashion (or at all), given that I'll be hip-deep in press tour — and then I'll ask you: what did everybody else think?

Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Alan Sepinwall Recaps & Reviews

View By Show »

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Lizzie

    When Kristina walked out of the hotel at the end, she looked like a Conehead.

    January 2, 2013 at 11:36AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      jan That's what I thought, too.......unfortunately. Kind of spoiled the moment and made it not as emotional as it should have been.

      January 2, 2013 at 11:55AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DonBoy She looked uncannily like the bald Lt. Ilia from the first Star Trek movie, and the outfit itself was odd enough that I have to wonder if it was a deliberate joke for some reason.

      http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/star-trek-movies/images/8475818/title/lieutenant-ilia-photo

      January 2, 2013 at 4:46PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Steve

    I agree that the bald cap was distracting, but don't agree that it was "seamless", at least during the shaving scene where a line along her forehead was pretty visible (maybe a screener vs. HD TV issue). I don't know how else they would have gone about it, but it was unfortunate. The sleek white coat she wore out of the hotel also added to the weird sci-fi vibe of her look.

    The Julia/Joel stuff was good (appropriately uncomfortable), but it seems like they're artificially amping up some aspects of the tension. Obviously Sydney would have difficulty with the transition, but it almost seems like they've never sat her down and discussed the situation at all. Not that they would tell her everything, but even a simple "Victor is going through some tough stuff right now and we need to be extra nice to him" would seem to help with the dinner scene. And how would any other kids at school know any specifics of his situation?

    January 2, 2013 at 11:38AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      kronicfatigue I was typing up my post and missed this. I'll sign on to your comment about explaining it to Sydney.

      Also, the ease in which Kristina shaved her head was jarring. With the first pass on the top of her head, she was basically clean shaven.

      good point about the sleek white coat.

      January 2, 2013 at 11:57AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Jackie I also find it strange and unrealistic that any parent would expect their child from Sydney's background to just magically understand something as complex as Victor's situation! I though the bald cap looked terrible, but at the end I thought she looked beautiful in the fancy white coat. She looked like she felt beautiful.

      January 5, 2013 at 4:25PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Evan T.

    Kristina told the salesman she is 34. Was she lying to him even though this was after she came clean about being married? Seems too young given how old her oldest daughter is...

    January 2, 2013 at 11:43AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Andy_looking_up_talkback_profile

      andythesaint That would have made her 16/17 when they had Haddie. So either she was still lying, the show screwed up, or there's a big back story between her and Adam they've never discussed.

      January 2, 2013 at 12:12PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Sarah I took it as she was definitely still fibbing. She and Adam are clearly meant to be in their 40's--she just wanted to keep up one of the more complimentary aspects of the ruse...

      January 2, 2013 at 12:40PM EST
    • Tavernwenchlogo_talkback_profile

      TavernWench Thanks so much for noticing this! It bugged me long after I watched the episode, so I decided I must have heard it wrong. I wasn't under wasn't the impression she was still fibbing; could the writers have really screwed up this badly? Who is the oldest Braverman child: Adam or Sarah? Didn't Sarah just turn 40?

      Why am I so concerned about them possibly screwing up Kristina's age? :)

      January 2, 2013 at 9:20PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      shirily thank you. i came here specifically to see if anyone else noticed this as well. i immediately did the math and thought to myself that adam was the stable, responsible braverman - no way would he have gotten married and had a child as a teenager!

      January 3, 2013 at 12:48AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      rlaroi I also noticed this and was doing the math. To me it did not seem that she was fibbing still - she noted she had three children, etc. and introduced Adam.... I think this was a screw up in the writing.

      January 3, 2013 at 5:39AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SlackerInc The writers have goofed up things before but I do not think so here. She was fibbing: three kids is perfectly plausible at 34 as long as the oldest is like nine, not nineteen!

      January 3, 2013 at 2:40PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Jacs Oh TY others noticed this too. I can't imagine she had Haddie at 16?? I even tweeted Sarah Watson one of the writers to get clarification. ( so far nada). Seems like a really big screw-up, and something so easily checkable, so am shocked if it was a writing error. They are clearly in their 40's.

      January 5, 2013 at 1:20AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Sadie It seemed very clear she was still fibbing - they cut to Adam smirking when she said 34. She and Adam are in their 40s....

      January 5, 2013 at 2:44AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SlackerInc Oh, good catch, Sadie. I didn't notice the smirk. I just don't think the writers could possibly be that mathematically challenged. They know she has a daughter in college, and for that matter they had a 40th birthday shindig for Sarah a while back, and I don't see them making Kristina like six or seven years younger than Sarah.

      January 5, 2013 at 3:42AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    kronicfatigue

    I waited longer for this review than Sarah waited to hop into bed with Hank after being dumped by Mark. I'm not just suffering from Sarah romance fatigue, I'm fully disappointed in her behavior/character and I think the writers did a great disservice by giving her a pass. She screwed up a relationship with a great guy, and more importantly, dragged her son into the abyss with her. She forced him to move in with his former teacher only to swing him back to his grandparents...all in his senior year of high school and all while he already has abandonment issues because of his father.

    The family's reaction to the Mark-->Hank switcheroo is summed up in some drunken banter at a bar? Why does Sarah continue to get a pass for her horrible behavior while Crosby always gets raked over the coals despite obviously trying so much harder. How many years have passed since Sarah took the walk of shame and moved back in with her parents. She still can't afford rent? Every time her parents try to bring up anything with her, she huffs and puffs and whines about not being treated like an adult.

    She's NOT an adult.

    She was ready to marry Mark. She would have still been with Mark if he didn't realize what a train-wreck she is. How can she instantly be moving into another relationship? How can she swoon just b/c the guy brought breakfast for her? I don't see how anyone could ever root for her...she puts no effort in bettering herself or trying to improve her behavior.

    Did Kristina and Adam say they were 34? Did I mishear that? Haddie has to be 18 b/c she's in college, right? that would mean they were 16 when they had her...15 ish when Kristina got pregnant? I'm hoping I just misheard the age, b/c that doesn't feel like it jives with their backstory.

    I groaned with Jasmine's reaction to Crosby's concerns, but I wound up really liking that storyline. Crosby's grown into my favorite character, even passing Adam.

    Adam and Kristina's "fight" over the wig, and the makeup, was really great television. It wasn't a question of right vs. wrong...it was just emotional and confusing. Big fan.

    I don't think I liked the black and whiteness of Joel vs. Julia's reaction. Throwing a bat through a glass door is extreme behavior. Joel dismissing it as an "accident" doesn't ring true. Julia slipping and saying "our kid" and not including Victor felt a little too on-the-nose, but I'll accept it b/c there's never enough time to cover all the stories/characters. Along those lines, I wish they treated Sydney with a little more respect. I think she's mature enough to be explained why they are bending the rules for Victor. By not doing so, she's forced to keep wondering, and that ultimately leads to tense situations where she's told to shut up.

    January 2, 2013 at 11:54AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      jan Kristina said she was 34, not 27 after Adam showed up and she admitted he was her husband.

      Agree 100% about Sarah and Mark vs. Hank. (Loved the first sentence of your review.)

      I, too, liked Crosby's storyline and how he accepts his mother-in-law at the end, and I liked the "fight" over the wig as well.

      Not sure about the whole Joel/Julia/Victor thing. Not having been in that situation, I don't know what the best thing to do would be, but I don't see how they can keep treating Victor so much differently from Sydney. I had hoped when Julia grabbed him and hustled him into the house that there were actually--finally--going to be some consequences for his behavior. My feeling was that when they walk on eggshells all the time and he gets away with everything--the broccoli, the TV, etc., etc.--why should he consider her his "real mother"? She doesn't treat him like a "real mother" would and punish him for inappropriate behavior. I'm not sure what kind of punishment there should have been, but there should have been consequences.

      January 2, 2013 at 12:07PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Steve Yeah, you reminded me of another thing I didn't like about the Victor incident, though maybe this one will be addressed next week - If they just asked Sydney what happened, and about the conversation leading up to it, it would be pretty clear that it wasn't an accident.

      I assumed that Kristina saying she was 34 was still a lie, albeit a confusing one (Maybe to not make the guy feel stupid for believing she was 27?). Not only based on Haddie's age, but the age of all the other Braverman siblings and the fact that Adam (who we've never had reason to believe is significantly older than Kristina) is the oldest.

      January 2, 2013 at 12:09PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      pecola I don't recall the exact number Kristina mentioned to the salesman but it seemed clear to me that she was still embellishing her age.

      January 2, 2013 at 1:16PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      madmeme Given that the real actors are 47/41 - and look close to that - I didn't doubt that she was supposed to be still 'playing' when she said 34.

      January 2, 2013 at 11:10PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Elle Maybe biased because I DO like Sarah & Hank, but I think the show speeded up them getting involved because they have a limited number of episodes. As for the family's take on Mark vs. Hank, I think that was only a little of it...would be interesting to see how it changes if Sarah and Hank stay together. I think he really hates crowds/big groups so would be interesting to see how he deals with her family and how involved they get with each other.

      January 3, 2013 at 2:45PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    leemats

    I love Lauren Graham, but it seemed weird to have Sarah in the wig store with Adam. Rather than steer Adam in the right direction, it seemed that her purpose in the scene was to just be "the character Adam can have dialogue with" and to be comic relief in the pink wig.
    Whenever they misuse Graham, I feel like I need to watch an episode of Gilmore Girls.

    January 2, 2013 at 11:55AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Caricatureandrew4_talkback_profile

      Biddle Sarah actually told Adam Kristina should be there picking them out herself but he felt she'd be too embarrassed to go wig shopping. Then when he picked the blonde wig Sarah was very clearly dubious about his choice. I think the point of the scene was that even though he asked Sarah along, he had his own ideas of what Kristina needed. This scene is why the scene with her getting upset about him buying her a wig worked so well.

      January 2, 2013 at 3:25PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Meg

    I don't really get what the writers have been up to with the adoption storyline. It seems it has been mishandled by Julia and Joel, but I also think that much of the blame lies with crap writing. Adopting an older child is not like it has been portrayed. There are social workers, there is family counseling to help with the adjustment, there is private counseling with Victor so he understands the concept that he will not be seeing his bio-mom again (and why exactly is that? She gave up her parental rights, that means she's legally not his mom, but was this always arranged as a closed adoption? A 9 year old kid is just suddenly supposed to start calling some stranger "mom and dad" and forget that he does have a biological mother? The hell?).

    The way this show has portrayed it, it's like the State just dumped Victor into Julia and Joel's laps and was like "Here's your son. See ya, good luck!" It's really not accurate.

    I hope the bat throwing incident is addressed. This is the second time a younger Braverman has been cruel to Victor without it being addressed, first when Max told him he isn't a "real" family member, and now Sydney telling him his real mom must not love him. Not that Victor's behavior was acceptable in any way, he could have killed her, but can we deal with how this poor kid is being treated?

    January 2, 2013 at 1:42PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Hannah Lee RE: the lack of support for the adoption. The show did a similar thing when Max was mainstreamed back into school; he was just plopped back in with no IDP, no meetings with the teachers, no support/therapists.

      I think the writers do it to up the drama, but instead it's distracting because it makes no sense.

      January 3, 2013 at 1:07PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    mgrabois

    It appears that nobody in Julia's family found out the real reason Victor threw the bat. It wasn't an accident, he got pissed off from Sydney taunting him. He couldn't eat in her because Joel and Julia wouldn't believe it, and she wouldn't tell her parents because then she'd be in trouble. So the two kids had to independently lie and say it was an accident.

    January 2, 2013 at 1:50PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      kronicfatigue I disagree. If Joel and Julia really believed it was an accident, then the conversation has to go to a place where Julia is getting called out for being angry over an "accident". Actually, the more I think about it, I think the writers painted themselves into a catch 22. Either Julia should be calling out Joel for hiding behind the word "accident", or Joel should be calling out Julia for being mad over an accident.

      I don't think Syndey was full on "taunting". She was asking questions, Victor was being cruel to her and she got more aggressive in her questions. Even if the last line was a taunt, she'd retell the story to Julia with a different slant. "He threw a bat at me and all I did was ask about his real mom"

      January 2, 2013 at 1:58PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Ana Escalating comments such as "Your mom must not love you" or "kids in the schoolyard say your mom is on drugs" and seeing how Victor was reacting to each and continuing on is definitely taunting.

      January 2, 2013 at 3:10PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      lh Sydney seemed to me to be taunting Victor. It was troubling how she escalated her cruelty, making me wonder if she has something really wrong with her empathy and if that was the intention of the writers. Hers were very dark words that I thought dripped with malice.

      As much sympathy as I feel for Christina, the actress looked like she was preparing for a bit part as an alien in "Mars Attacks."

      January 2, 2013 at 3:41PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      MadlyMild I think it mattered not at all whether Sydney was taunting or asking insensitive questions, what she was saying was hurtful and mean. If she doesn't know by that age what she's saying, it is beyond time for her parents to talk with her about that.
      I remember lots of times in my childhood where kids (girls) could totally get away with saying the meanest things, but any physical reaction was not tolerated. I hate to see that even to have implied endorsement here.

      January 3, 2013 at 12:16AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      kronicfatigue Were Sydney's original questions mean? I honestly can't remember, but I do remember Victor's responses being over the top in their cruelty. Sydney came back with full on taunting at that point, and then victor did something that easily could have killed her.

      January 3, 2013 at 12:40AM EST
  • Duckorbunnysmall_talkback_profile

    ghoti

    Alan, it is unquestionably "just as soon as I locate the Johnson file...".

    January 2, 2013 at 4:13PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Tavernwenchlogo_talkback_profile

      TavernWench Ha!! That would've been perfect!!

      January 2, 2013 at 9:23PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SlackerInc Nice!

      January 3, 2013 at 2:44PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    katimsfan

    Maybe there is a lot of Sarah romance fatigue, and I understand that. Still, I find myself rooting for this relationship because it does seem to be between two people who are better for each other than those they've tried to be with in the past. They remind me a lot of the Jack Nicholson/Helen Hunt combo in 'As good as it gets.' When Hank said he couldn't stop making eye contact with Sarah when with everyone else, he can't even start, it reminded me of my favorite line from the movie, when Melvin says, 'you make me want to be a better man.' I think the actors make this material great, but I am admitted Lauren Graham fan.

    January 2, 2013 at 4:21PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Paladin While I'm definitely "fatigued" by all of Sarah's relationship drama and continued poor life choices, I can't help but sit here wondering how in the world ANYONE could root for an obviously manipulative, controlling possibly alcoholic, man who essentially orchestrated the break up of his EMPLOYEES relationship with her FIANCÉE, so he could bed her, because he "can't stop looking at her". That's not romantic, that's a freeking STALKER!

      Sarah is indeed a broken woman who is attracted to broken men, and in fact enables them. When she had a chance at a good, healthy relationship she did everything in her power (with plenty of Hank's help)to sabotage it, and finally succeeded.

      And you would think that the rest of the clan, who are supposedly so enlightened, wouldn't fall into the trap of condemning Mark simply because he was younger than Sarah or "less experienced". Why is it that when a man beds a younger woman, it's snickers and grins and high fives all around, (Hugh Hefner) But an older woman and younger man elicits comments about how "he's just a puppy" and such? Double standards anyone? I for one am hoping that this relationship crashes and burns like the Hindenburg, so that PERHAPS Sarah will finally wake up and smell the coffee and get her act together.

      January 2, 2013 at 7:05PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Paladin While I'm definitely "fatigued" by all of Sarah's relationship drama and continued poor life choices, I can't help but sit here wondering how in the world ANYONE could root for an obviously manipulative, controlling possibly alcoholic, man who essentially orchestrated the break up of his EMPLOYEES relationship with her FIANCÉE, so he could bed her, because he "can't stop looking at her". That's not romantic, that's a freeking STALKER!

      Sarah is indeed a broken woman who is attracted to broken men, and in fact enables them. When she had a chance at a good, healthy relationship she did everything in her power (with plenty of Hank's help)to sabotage it, and finally succeeded.

      And you would think that the rest of the clan, who are supposedly so enlightened, wouldn't fall into the trap of condemning Mark simply because he was younger than Sarah or "less experienced". Why is it that when a man beds a younger woman, it's snickers and grins and high fives all around, (Hugh Hefner) But an older woman and younger man elicits comments about how "he's just a puppy" and such? Double standards anyone? I for one am hoping that this relationship crashes and burns like the Hindenburg, so that PERHAPS Sarah will finally wake up and smell the coffee and get her act together.

      January 2, 2013 at 7:05PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SlackerInc I hated that movie but I share your enjoyment of these characters, which seems rare in online discussions of the show.

      January 3, 2013 at 2:45PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Elle Oh wow, I really like your assessment of it! Yeah I see the Jack Nicholson/Helen Hunt parallel--although I think Hank is a lot more 'normal' than Jack's character was ;-)

      January 3, 2013 at 2:47PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    morningstar

    I hate the adopton story and agree it's poorly written at best but also the child who plays Victor is the MOST annoying kid actor on the planet followed closely by the kid who plays Syd. May they both be returned to "birth parents" sometime soon. Worst part of the show every week.

    January 2, 2013 at 6:46PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      charl I feel the same way. Get rid of Victor...he's not worth it!

      January 3, 2013 at 3:31PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Cy

    Ridiculous bald cap. And we have all seen the cancer patient shaves their head scene a million times. We didn't need to see that to get the impact. It only served to bring me out of the scene because it all looked so fake. It's up to the writers to figure some other way to get their point across. Up your game Parenthood.

    Also,seriously,Sydney is lucky to be alive after he whipped that bat at her.

    January 2, 2013 at 11:51PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Satan_is_real_talkback_profile

    erika_herzog

    this episode of PARENTHOOD was very dark and anxious.

    it's a given that every week when i watch it's sobfest 101 but this week's episode was seriously difficult to watch. in pretty stark contrast to prior episodes, so i don't think it's the cancer storyline.

    i think there was something about the direction or editing. can't pinpoint much beyond the bad skullcap thing; it seemed more fundamentally off than that.

    also, can we just talk about the fact that Crosby has $5,000 to lend no problem?!? and added to that the cost of the hotel getaway, and the wig Adam bought.

    there seems to be a pretty huge disconnect about money and real people. or are we supposed to just ignore the fact that money was an issue once upon a time and now Team Braverman, well, they are all totally rich and money is no longer a concern?!?

    the whole problem of servicing all the storylines was pretty apparent this week. i miss max, zeke, camille. and did we just totally lose Matt Lauria? i think that's a mistake....
    .

    January 3, 2013 at 10:41AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Kathy I have to agree with you on the money. That was a huge WTF for me. It was just earlier in the season that Jasmine took Crosby to task over the credit card bill. Now suddenly they have $5,000 that they can give to Renee? It just doesn't make any sense when we've seen time and time again that things are still financially tight with the Luncheonette that Crosby and Jasmine would have that kind of money in savings. Additionally there was also a recent scene where Crosby asked to have a bump in pay. Eventually Adam did give in to it, but that is a recent happening. Too recent for me to believe that things have gotten that much better for him.

      Additionally regarding the money, I can't understand how Renee is that deep in debt after only just losing her job. She seems like such a sensible and responsible person. Surely Renee would be the type to have a rainy day fund. So it felt a little contrived to have her needing to move in so quickly.

      January 3, 2013 at 11:34AM EST
    • @Kathy, thank goodness i'm not the only one. and great points - i had forgotten about the whole Crosby raise thing (and that wasn't that long ago, like you said)....

      yeah, the whole thing with Renee was very confusing. it definitely felt out of character to have her character be in debt and having to move in. like a pasted together rush job of plottiness that is not typical to the PARENTHOOD i know and love. totally agree!

      January 3, 2013 at 1:41PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SlackerInc I don't see a problem with a co-owner of a successful recording studio with only one employee (Amber) having some dough. Recording artists pay a lot per hour and the overhead is not that high by comparison. Much better (as long as you have a steady stream of clients, natch) than a restaurant for instance.

      January 3, 2013 at 2:49PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      kronicfatigue To tag along with Slackerinc, I'd imagine that Crosby's savings are very liquid. I doubt he's putting anything in CDs, 401ks, etc. It's probably all in his checking account, which is why he said he "technically" had it available.

      I cringed when they said Renee had credit card debt. That shouldn't be the responsibility of Crosby/Jasmine. They have a young kid, and are planning on a second. Letting your family member stay with you through a hard time is fine, but paying for their poor financial decisions isn't. She loses her job right before xmas, and within 2 weeks is needing to move out of her place (where's all her furniture?) and/or needing 5k?!?!

      January 3, 2013 at 3:26PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    SlackerInc

    I heart practical jokes, so I adored the one Amber pulled on Adam.

    January 3, 2013 at 2:51PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Elle

    I always enjoy Alan's reviews but this time I don't agree with some of it. I really like the storyline with Sarah and Hank and if I had to choose, I'd MUCH rather see that watch the story with Jasmine's mother, which was kind of boring to me and just seemed like filler.

    I've missed some from previous seasons, but why not appreciate Sarah's current relationship for what it is, instead of trying to compare it to past storylines.

    Who knows, maybe she actually IS ready to move forward in her life. Give it a chance.

    January 3, 2013 at 2:53PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Elle Typo above--in case it's not clear, I meant to say I'd much rather see the Sarah & Hank storyline than the story with Jasmine's mother.

      January 3, 2013 at 2:57PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SlackerInc I like it too, Elle, and I thought it was very sweet, seeing Sarah really nudge Hank into actually asking her out, and then later when he was going to get her croissants to bring her in bed but she was freaking out and thinking she should leave.

      I didn't mind the Jasmine's mom story though.

      January 5, 2013 at 3:50AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    ScarletKnight

    "Shut up," Julia explained.

    January 3, 2013 at 3:13PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jessica

    I really do not care for Sydney. I think she is portrayed as a brat! I get that she was an only child but they do let her get away with a lot of sass! I get annoyed anytime there is interaction with her. Granted, I feel like they should explain things to her a little better when it comes to victor but she gets away with a lot!

    January 3, 2013 at 5:48PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    historymiss

    It's ultimately really hard to make an actor look like a cancer patient, especially if she stuffs her giant head of hair under a bald cap. When I had BC (I was 32), what really made me look cancery was having no eyebrows or eyelashes, and you can't really ask an actor to loose those!

    January 3, 2013 at 6:31PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jason

    Excellent episode. Couple of questions we've been tossing around in our house.

    First, did the show ever explain how Adam and Christina magically solved all their financial troubles? Things should be exceedingly tight if not downright scary after he declined to sell the studio and they sent Haddie to Cornell. Yet not only is there no discussion of finances, they're resolving fights by renting limos and staying in luxury hotels.

    Second, why was there no repercussion for lying to Haddie about Christina's condition? The character the writers have very nicely crafted over the years should be apoplectic.

    January 4, 2013 at 4:58AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Kath FINALLY someone asks what I've been wondering about for weeks! I do not agree with the parenting decision to LIE to Haddie. What kind of damage will that cause to their relationship when the truth comes out? And since everyone else knows about her going through chemo, are they in on the deception or do they just never speak to Haddie?

      I have really enjoyed this show in past seasons but feel this was a real writing oversight. In addition, this season's cancer thing is such a big topic to tackle without resorting to cliche and/or emotional manipulation of the audience. Not sure I'm onboard but still rooting for the Braverman's.

      One final note, oddly the show's storylines feel thinner to me when they focus on just a few couples rather than a little bit of everyone. How is that possible?

      January 4, 2013 at 6:02AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SlackerInc I agree with your second comment, but on the first I think we are to understand that the studio is doing great business which is why it was worth so much to sell to begin with. I mean, I know a guy who owns a bar in my college town, and he has enough dough to have his own private plane (not a jet, just a little prop plane, but still). I think if you own a business in the Bay Area and it does well, you are going to be kind of raking in the dough. Maybe not enough to move into a gated manse and hire a personal shopper, but enough to live a comfortable suburban existence and send a daughter to an Ivy League school.

      January 5, 2013 at 3:47AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Corinna

    I NEED THAT WHITE COAT!! I love that winter white coat with the black belt that Christina wore walking out of the hotel.

    January 4, 2013 at 9:10PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      SlackerInc That really caught my wife's breath too! She has a thing for coats, and she was so drooling over that, but also assumed it is probably very expensive and thus out of our price range.

      January 5, 2013 at 3:44AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Tina Morris

    Anyone know what year that black Cadillac limo was?

    January 5, 2013 at 4:27PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    dladkins

    yes, i agree its a terrible makeup job and she does look like one of the cone heads

    January 17, 2013 at 4:09PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Around the Web

News From Our Partners