Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: Lindsay Lohan doesn't impress in Lifetime's 'Liz & Dick'

Co-star Grant Bowler does better as Richard Burton than she does as Elizabeth Taylor

  • Critic's Rating D+
  • Readers' Rating n/a
<p>Grant Bowler and Lindsay Lohan are Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor in Lifetime's "Liz & Dick."</p>

Grant Bowler and Lindsay Lohan are Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor in Lifetime's "Liz & Dick."

Credit: Lifetime
It's not hard to understand why Lifetime would want to take a risk on the erratic Lindsay Lohan to play Elizabeth Taylor in the channel's new movie "Liz & Dick" (Sunday at 9 p.m.).

First Lohan's likely the most famous actress the channel could get for the role — even if she's been more infamous for the last several years — and her presence will draw attention from people who otherwise wouldn't bother watching. (Case in point: this is the first Lifetime movie I've written about in six years, going back to Sarah Chalke in "Why I Wore Lipstick to My Mastectomy.")

Second, Lohan and Taylor have enough in common — former child stars who have become paparazzi obsessions as adults — that the "Liz & Dick" producers might have hoped this would be the role to re-harness the talent Lohan has let drift away in the years since "Mean Girls," and possibly provide some focus for her as well.

Unfortunately, that didn't happen. Off-camera, Lohan got into several tabloid-ready incidents during filming. On-camera, she’s inexpressive and extremely contemporary, in no way evoking one of the most iconic movie stars of all time even when she's wearing one of Taylor's signature costumes from "Cleopatra."

The shame of it is, her co-star Grant Bowler (you may remember him as Cooter the werewolf biker on "True Blood") acquits himself quite well as the love of Taylor's life, her two-time husband Richard Burton. The New Zealand-born Bowler does a close enough approximation of Burton's deep Welsh voice. More importantly, though, he's believable as a temperamental, alcoholic star of stage and screen whose worst instincts come to the surface whenever he gets a look at Liz Taylor's big violet eyes.

If Lohan were up for playing at Bowler's level, "Liz & Dick" might not be a great movie — like "Cleopatra," the famously expensive film the two met on, it's overdone in every way (there are two different framing devices, as if writer Christopher Monger and/or director Lloyd Kramer couldn't choose between them) and features horribe dialogue like "I don't loathe you; I hate you!" — but it might be an entertaining biopic about a couple who inadvertently helped create the celebrity tabloid culture we live in today.
 
But because Lohan seems to be going to a costume party dressed as Taylor while Bowler's giving a performance, the whole thing is an imbalanced mess. When a scene is focusing on Burton, it’s melodramatic but sincere. When it’s about Taylor, and Lohan is flatly delivering lines like “You know I’m shagging him senseless, don’t you?,” it’s camp. And the two halves don’t fit.
 
There’s probably a metaphor in there somewhere about the relationship between Burton the thespian from the stage (though he starred in plenty of schlock to support their lifestyle) and Taylor the legendary movie beauty (though she won two Oscars for her acting, including the year she won for “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” and Burton didn’t). But in practice, it doesn’t work. “Liz & Dick” isn’t good enough to be a fitting tribute to this tempestuous, well-chronicled romance, nor bad enough to be a camp classic. It’s just a flat, uneven biopic that will get viewership on Sunday night not because it’s good, but because of who’s in it.
 
Like almost everyone who watched Lohan grow up on screen in “The Parent Trap,” “Freaky Friday” and “Mean Girls,” I had high hopes for what she might do as an adult. But as a child star who remained successful as an adult, Taylor was the exception, not the rule, and she had her own struggles along the way. I’d have been very happy if “Liz & Dick” had turned out to be the first step in a major Lohan comeback. It’s not.

Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Paul F

    Wouldn't people who read this blog be more likely to remember Bowler as the freighter captain on Lost?

    He's also the host of the Australian Amazing Race, which is more enjoyable than the US version these days. Shame he's stuck in this.

    November 23, 2012 at 9:57AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall I had forgotten the freighter captain even existed until you mentioned him, Paul. One of those Lost characters/threads that got a lot of set-up ("You really don't want to see the captain") and absolutely no follow-through.

      November 23, 2012 at 9:59AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Dave I What Alan said...

      November 23, 2012 at 10:18AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Steve "Wouldn't people who read this blog be more likely to remember Bowler as the freighter captain on Lost?"

      This one definitely would.

      November 23, 2012 at 11:00AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    guest

    By Grant Bowler's own comment, he says that "great acting is a bloodsport". Whereas Lindsay Lohan interviews she was talking about the beauty, glamour, and love of Richard and Elizabeth. I don't think the two actors were coming at the characters in the same manner. Did anyone ask Lindsay what it was like working with Grant. Was she trying to play a sensual Elizabeth Taylor against an actor who was in a "bloodsport" as he said on Accesshollywood.

    November 23, 2012 at 11:45AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Nigel Hendricks

    Elizabeth Taylor is not happy about the casting of Lindsay Lohan: http://hollywoodandswine.com/elizabeth-taylor-turns-over-in-her-grave-after-learning-shell-be-played-by-lindsay-lohan/

    November 23, 2012 at 11:54AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Susan

    I have no intention of watching this, but the review was worth reading just for the phrase "Cooter the werewolf biker."

    November 23, 2012 at 2:00PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Adam "Had a very shiny nooooooose..."

      November 25, 2012 at 10:04PM EST
  • Stubby1_talkback_profile

    cadfile

    "But because Lohan seems to be going to a costume party dressed as Taylor while Bowler's giving a performance, the whole thing is an imbalanced mess."

    This is the point I saw as well. That's what happens when producers go for looks rather than talent. I was disappointed myself.

    November 23, 2012 at 3:53PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Flat_eric_talkback_profile

    HISLOCAL

    I once heard someone describe Lohan as "the chain-smoking spectre of a haunted highway overpass"

    November 24, 2012 at 2:53PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    mary

    You can't blame Lindsay Lohan for the horrible script, horrible makeup, lousy photography, etc. just a bad movie overall...Mr. Bowler wasn't that great either neither were any of the supporting characters. I don't think anyone could have done a good job with this.

    December 3, 2012 at 4:41PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web