Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: 'Girls' - 'I Get Ideas': Rescue 911

Hannah clashes with her old boyfriend and her new one, while Marnie finds work

<p>Donald Glover as Sandy in "Girls."</p>

Donald Glover as Sandy in "Girls."

Credit: HBO

Are you a fan of Girls?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

A review of tonight's "Girls" coming up just as soon as I enlighten you about how things are tougher for minorities...

"It wasn't for me, exactly." -Sandy

Hannah Horvath, like so many great comic heroes and heroines of our time, suffers from a severe self-awareness deficit. The show about her, however, does not, which is how we can get a blistering, funny sequence like Hannah and Sandy's break-up, which is at once the most meta moment in "Girls" history and one that feels entirely true to what we know about Hannah.

"I Get Ideas" was written by "Girls" co-showrunner Jenni Konner, who said (in a wide-ranging, interesting Vulture interview) that Donald Glover's casting was in the works even before the diversity backlash began. But you can't watch that scene where he complains about her essay and not imagine that Konner had that critique of the show — and so many others — on her mind. In that sequence, Sandy gets to give voice to so many of the people who dislike "Girls" for so many different reasons, and what's smart and uncomfortable and hilarious about the scene is that Konner lets him be right, more or less.

We don't know the actual quality of the essay, but we do know that Hannah often thinks more highly of her talent than others do, and we know that "Girls" itself is a show very much lost in its own head — and that if you enjoy being inside that head, you'll love the show, and if you don't, it's hard to tolerate. It focuses on problems that many would dismiss as trivial (though it's far from the first comedy to do so, even on HBO). Even Hannah's reaction to his criticism is itself a signal; she expected nothing but praise, like she got from everyone else, and is certain she can convince him of her genius if given a chance to have a dialogue.

(This is not how Dunham and Konner have reacted to criticism of the show, by the way, but that again illustrates the difference between a show about a spoiled and deluded person and one run by spoiled and deluded people.)

And as Hannah tries to grab any handhold available to her to win this argument — because her self-worth is tied up in her belief in her talent, and if she can't convince this guy that she's a good writer, then there can be no relationship with him — things go from bad to much, much worse. (For her; for us, it's better.) Sandy accuses Hannah of viewing him as her token black boyfriend — in the way that, frankly, Donald Glover could be viewed as an easy two-episode nod to the diversity complaints — and Hannah gets hilariously indignant about the whole thing, claiming she wasn't thinking about his race when she started dating him, when she cited prison statistics about black men to him, or when she quoted Missy Elliott's "Work It" at him. Whether or not she dated Sandy because she wanted a black boyfriend — and I have to think it was more the Donald Glover of him, plus the anti-Adam of him — she was damn sure aware of his race. In real life, Dunham has since acknowledged that the show's lily-white slice of Brooklyn was a mistake(*), but Hannah's defensive reaction to Sandy's complaint played as a wicked parody of the media portrait of Dunham as the backlash started, even as it felt exactly like the sort of thing Hannah would do.

(*) Would that the many other shows on television with their own diversity problems were so willing to regret (and address) the error. 

And the episode's Adam scenes make clear why Hannah would be so invested in making things work with a stable guy, even if he's not a good match. Because as much as we grew to like Adam over the course of season 1, the guy is a lunatic. Their roles have on one level reversed from a year ago — he's the one obsessed with her, and she's the one treating his heart like it's monkey meat — but on another, the roles can't truly be reversed, because Hannah stalking Adam is uncomfortable but more harmful to her than him, while you can understand why Adam's creepy sad bastard songs and unexpected appearance in the apartment might have prompted her to call 911.

Adam Driver was fantastic in those scenes late last season where we got to finally see the Adam that Hannah believed was always in there behind the creepy come-ons, but he's just as much fun playing an Adam who's set all of his filters aside. (His delivery of "You called the po-po!" was the funniest thing in the episode not having to do with Hannah denying knowledge of Missy Elliott.)

These two kind of deserve each other — and I imagine we have many more reconciliations and break-ups in their future — but I would say Hannah's cumulative behavior in this episode (including her bogus offer to come by the police station later to check on Adam) probably nudges her into the disreputable lead for now. It's amazing, in a way, that the show has been so willing at the start of season two to make Hannah even more selfish, even more of a screw-up, than she was at so many points in the first season. Clearly, Dunham, Konner and company are aware of the criticism they got last year. And clearly, they have adjusted the show in reaction to some of it. But in the most fundamental aspect of "Girls" — telling the story of a vulnerable, flawed young woman and not worrying about achieving some kind of theoretical, unattainable degree of likability — they not only haven't wavered, but doubled down. Hannah's a very difficult person in "I Get Ideas." But she's also fascinating, and deeply, deeply funny in the ways that she's difficult.

Some other thoughts:

* Marnie gets a "pretty person job" hostessing in a club (Elijah's very accurate critique of her new uniform: "You look like a slutty Von Trapp child"), which only increases the tension between her and Hannah when Hannah realizes that Marnie doesn't think Hannah's attractive enough to get the same kind of job. This will get worse before it gets better, methinks.

* The woman who rejected Marnie for a gallery job was played by Laurie Simmons, who in real life is a successful New York artist and is Lena Dunham's mom. (And played her mom in "Tiny Furniture.") Cue umpteenth accusation of nepotism. Cue umpteenth sarcastic response that having a mom who's known in the New York arts scene is like being handed the keys to television. Lather, rinse, repeat.

* The show doesn't run away from the consequences of Elijah and Marnie's failed sexual encounter, as George dumps an incredulous Elijah upon hearing the news. Elijah, like Hannah, gets called on his crap by a lover, and doesn't understand how he could be at fault with anything.

* Jessa gets some more screen time this week in the premiere, and continues to be insufferably smug about her quickie marriage to Thomas John, who's in way over his head with this lady.

* Adam does accomplish one good thing with his visit to the apartment: he saves Hannah from what would have surely been the disastrous result of trying to cut her own hair with the help of YouTube.

What did everybody else think?

Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Jack

    Love this episode. Love the fact that they brought up money issues for a change and the fact that Lena is bringing in some of the criticisms of the writing with the black Republican. I loved Jessas line about the Glass Steagall Act because its so accurate.

    January 20, 2013 at 10:47PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Florance I can ..not believe it....just check http://2.gp/qmuE

      January 21, 2013 at 11:46AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Schmye Bubbula George Machen @SchmyeBubbula
      .@lenadunham Sorry, but the financial institutions that melted-down didn't have anything to do with Glass-Steagall. http://bit.ly/VIltvB
      11:42 PM - 20 Jan 13

      January 21, 2013 at 3:06PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      gladly Perhaps Jessa (or Jenni Konner) is getting their news from The Newsroom?

      http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-07-28/business/35489373_1_glass-steagall-commercial-banks-biggest-banks

      January 21, 2013 at 5:56PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Eponymous

    I don't mean to play fact-checker, but, well...While Laurie Simmons is an artist, she does not, as stated above, own an art gallery.

    January 20, 2013 at 10:48PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall You are correct. Fixed.

      January 20, 2013 at 11:05PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Eponymous Yes, I know...and her father is, too.

      January 20, 2013 at 11:08PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Humanity

    The problem with this show isn't nepotism or a lack of diversity. It's that the "funniest thing in this episode" was a fundamentally un-funny line. It had not occurred to me that the line was supposed to be a funny moment. That this show is even mildly popular in a world in which people can watch 30 Rock, Community, Parks and Rec, Curb, Arrested Development, or hell, Cheers repeats on a loop, blows my mind. It's incredibly boring to me, though I'm sure others find it interesting, and that's fine. What I can't imagine that it is, for anyone on Earth, is funny. Yeesh.

    January 20, 2013 at 10:56PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Eponymous Humanity: AMEN!

      January 20, 2013 at 11:00PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      James 1st off, its a dramedy. 2ndly, the whole line about both parties being corrupt was hilarious and on point. So, you're wrong about their not being funny moments. Its a dramedy.

      January 20, 2013 at 11:01PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Ron Ozer I thought the funniest line was actually the one about shooting himself while they were watching the youtube video. I laughed out loud quite a bit this episode, unlike last week's.

      January 21, 2013 at 12:07AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      GRubi For me the funniest line was Elijah saying Marnie looked like a slutty Von Trapp child. I laughed out loud at that.

      January 21, 2013 at 3:24AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Manton This comment amounts to, "I can't believe that everyone doesn't share my opinion and/or taste." Welp, guess what? We all don't. Thanks for contributing.

      January 21, 2013 at 11:52AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      mart I agree 100% with humanity--this is a boring show! nothing new -- it's all been done before

      January 22, 2013 at 10:28AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    tim_masterson

    At what point does Hannah's severe self-awareness deficit spill over into standard sitcom fare and she becomes another Balki Bartokomous?

    I find that, in a weird way, I watch this show the same way I watch Game of Thrones. Both shows feature great writing*, but silly plotting. Both shows have good acting, but stupid characters. Nothing about the Adam plot rings true, but I like the character so much that I'm willing to give it a pass.

    The same goes for Shoshanna and Ray, who need about twice the screen time. Ray being so smitten is hilarious.

    *The bit about George still having Hotmail slayed me

    January 20, 2013 at 11:47PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      MaggieG "Nothing about the Adam plot rings true..."

      You've never been a 25-year-old woman, have you?

      January 21, 2013 at 8:23PM EST
    • No, but I have been a 25-year-old guy. I don't remember peeing in the shower on a girl and them falling irrationally in love with her.

      January 21, 2013 at 10:25PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Ben Kabak Because everything a 25 yr old male does you must have done for it to work on tv.

      January 22, 2013 at 2:34PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      kronicfatigue Tim was merely replying to maggie's comment

      January 24, 2013 at 1:35PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Jayne

    The only other person I've heard say 'po-po' is Madea. Alan, your defense of the level of Dunham's self-awareness reminds me of the Republicans who don't get Colbert as satire and think he is on their side.

    January 21, 2013 at 12:02AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      machpo Guess you never watched The Wire?

      January 21, 2013 at 12:31AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      gladly I think the rules of normal dialogue don't apply to Adam. Remember when he answered his sister's call with, "What's up, slut? Getting that pussy pounded?" Adam doesn't talk like other people--or any people.

      p.s. I think the Wire always used "Five-Oh"

      January 21, 2013 at 5:58PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    J

    Love the show. Am amused by people who get outraged by how much they do not like it; in some ways, they are this show's best joke.

    But this was a flub of an episode where everything felt tossed out in an unconvincing, unconsidered fashion. And not in a good way. (The Elijah-Marnie scenes feels like co-opted from some lame MTV drama. 'Undressed,' maybe.) I like my 'Girls' smarter and more focused than this.

    January 21, 2013 at 1:15AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      J This was a flub of a comment where I hit "reply" without proofreading. Talk about focus. (The Elijah-Marnie scenes feel co-opted from some lame MTV drama. 'Undressed,' maybe.)

      January 21, 2013 at 1:19AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    bjssp

    I am starting to get annoyed by all of the complaints that the show was horribly unrealistic because it was very white. Sure, New York has numerous types of people, and Brooklyn in particular is wonderfully diverse. But let's remember that these people flew in the same circles in a VERY tony liberal arts college, Oberlin, that is 80 percent white and, on the show, that they live in Greenpoint, which is also 80 percent white. And given how absurdly selfish and insular these characters are, is it really a stretch to think they wouldn't venture out in the world, not because they are biased but because they are, well, selfish and insular? I really respect Dunham, et al (yes, et al :]) for taking criticisms seriously, but I don't think they were way out of line with reality.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenpoint,_Brooklyn

    http://new.oberlin.edu/about/fast-facts.dot

    January 21, 2013 at 2:01AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      KK I totally agree with you. I have been silently thinking this same argument since last season. It's not "unrealistic" for the world they live in, especially considering, like you said, how insular they are.

      It also makes sense regarding the show as a whole. The first season was about these four girls and their relationships with one another. As the show progressed, we went with them into different aspects of their lives and met more of the people who color their world. I have friends of different races/backgrounds but I don't necessarily see them on an intimate, everyday level. That's why I believe them when they say they had plans to diversify the show in the second season before the criticism. It was the natural progression the show was already on in terms of widening our view as the audience of their world. Similar to how they widened our view of Adam during the "Crackcident." Before that episode we had only thought of him through Hannah's eyes. He was a terrible person who didn't care about her feelings. But then his little speech made you realize, it's not like Hannah's been some super awesome person who cared about him or his feelings either. It was the natural progression of opening up their world to see it from a different point of view.

      Tonight's episode is a good example of how wide the scope of the show has become. The opening scene didn't include any of the girls, just Elijah and George having a fight.

      January 21, 2013 at 5:20AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Jaxemer11 Agree with you completely. It would be completely inauthentic for these people to be hangingout with a bunch of minorities. They may have one or token miorities in their circle, but never in the inner circle.

      January 22, 2013 at 11:52PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    mgrabois

    Thw word "blobby" is uncommon enough that I noticed it, when Hannah mentioned something to Sandy about a "blobby mass of white women" (or close enough) it reminded me of the January 8th NY Post review of the show that mentioned Lena Dunham's "blobby body" twice (by Linda Stasi, at http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/tv/new_girl_on_top_mBHbR1rcwafv9yieVNDWfN). I'm assuming that this episode can't have been written and filmed in the last 2 weeks, right? Maybe the critic's mention of the word was triggered by her watching this episode. Hasn't the whole season been filmed already?

    January 21, 2013 at 2:18AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Images_talkback_profile

    M.J

    I really disliked the 3 episodes i saw in the first season and didn't "get" what was all the hype was about. Weirdly these first 2 episodes have turned me. I'm not sure what is so different about this season but one thing i did notice is that Elijah and Sandy are great additions to the show and less the girl are in one place at the same time, more i enjoy the show.(OR maybe it's just the fact that i love Donald Glover...)

    January 21, 2013 at 3:08AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Trilby May I suggest you go back and watch the rest of season one, now that you get it? Season one got better with each episode.

      January 21, 2013 at 11:19AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    wally

    Maybe there will be some comedy in the next episode...

    January 21, 2013 at 3:26AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Captain Steven K Linkolas
      Why are you still watching the second season of a television show you dislike?

      I really don't get this. When I watch a show in the first season and I don't like it, I don't keep watching it for years so I can leave cynical snarky comments on blogs. If I don't like a show, or I don't get a show, or a show isn't my particular style, I just don't watch it.

      Why do you continue to watch this show if you see no humor in it? I am not trying to attack you, I am legitimately puzzled by this behavior and I am wondering if you would care to explain? Thanks.

      January 21, 2013 at 3:41AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Trilby Have fun hate-watching, I guess.

      January 21, 2013 at 11:19AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    KK

    Comment sections of Girls episode reviews are becoming an increasingly strange place. I know Todd VanDerWerff at AV Club complains/laughs about his often and it's why I try not to go on there. But lately I feel like conversations everywhere about Girls is turning just as hostile/confusing.
    I am just not sure I understand people who don't "get the show." It's not that difficult. It's a comedy/drama about 20 something year old girls (and boys) trying to figure how to make it during that awkward time in life when you're supposed to be adjusting into adult life. You don't exactly know what you want to do with that life much less who you are as a person. Period. Boom. The end.
    I find this show completely engrossing and hilarious for an obvious reason- I am a 20 something year old post grad who is supposed to be an adult but not really sure about how I'm supposed to be doing that. And I would chalk that up as the reason why I am so obsessed with this show and why I find it so funny. I'm obviously the “target audience.”
    But the thing is, there are a lot of people who are not my age/demographic who also find Girls engrossing, very funny, and very smart. So the problem is not that you do not "get" the show. You just don’t like the show. You don't find it entertaining or think it is that funny. That is fine. I don’t like Big Bang Theory or NCSI, but there 21 million people who disagree with me every week. But I don’t read recaps of those shows and complain about not getting why everyone else love it.
    And that's what really baffles me. Why do you keep watching? The show already told you what it was in the pilot. Privileged post grads who have had everything given to them by their parents and know almost noting of how the real world works. The show is about playing the drama and comedy of those type of people encountering “real life” situations. Sure it has grown and changed since that first episode, but only in that it is a richer and more deep version of itself. It's never not going to be about how selfish these people are at this time in their lives. It is never not going to be about how they make seriously stupid decisions or really dumb comments about the world around them. They may change and learn from their mistakes at some point, but it's not going to be now or anytime soon and it’s still going to be told in this very distinct Lena Dunham way. Because if you haven’t heard, she’s not only the star of the show, but she writes and directs almost every episode.
    On a lighter note, LOVE this review Alan! Your commentary on the meta of Hannah and Sandy’s breakup was perfect. And I also find it fascinating how the show has not only immersed itself in Hannah (and all of the characters’) “unlikability” but has “doubled down on it” as you put. It’s reveling in this hilarious madness and I could not love it any more. I could ramble a dozen of my favorite lines (including your Po Po and Missy Elliot ones) but I think it’s a tie between “Fuck you Charlotte! Who I’ve never met!” or “I know I’ve always said he was murdery in a sexy way, but what if he’s murdery in like a murderer way?”

    January 21, 2013 at 4:51AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Greg Thank you KK, that was excellent.

      January 21, 2013 at 8:07AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      mart you can have your opinion & we can have ours--its that simple!

      January 22, 2013 at 10:38AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      joel My theory is that there is a large segment of Girls-haters who are indignant that the show continues to receive praise, that Dunham continues to get accolades, and that critics generally like this show. So they show up week after week, expecting something different yet getting the same results, and complain about it here.

      I applaud anyone who is willing to take a chance on a TV they otherwise dislike simply because critics roundly praise the show. This is good for TV and good for criticism.

      But coming to the reviews week after week just to complain is both arrogant and obnoxious. Maybe after season 2 they will give up and move on to better uses of their time. Maybe not.

      January 22, 2013 at 1:34PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Slam

    Maybe I was just in a good mood, but last night had more laugh out loud lines than any episode. HILARIOUS. Donald Glover, George's rant, Adam's creepy visit, Hannah denying she called 911, Elijah jabbing Sandy's politics ... ps that marriage is going down a dark road

    January 21, 2013 at 12:34PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      gladly Hannah's bleating as the cops were taking Adam away was hysterical. The whole, "Let me know, maybe I'll come by later?" I know it's cartoonish, but it had me laughing hysterically.

      January 21, 2013 at 6:02PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    KubricksRube

    I have to take issue with one thing in this review Alan. I don't see how any of Hannah's behavior can compete with Adam's terrifying behavior at the end of this episode. He entered her apartment without permission, refused to leave, was physically intimidating, demanded attention, refused to accept anything Hannah said or even acknowledge that she might be serious, and again and again just would not leave. She was right to be scared and consider 911. As awkward and self-absorbed as she is, I don't think Hannah has ever presented an actual threat to Adam.

    January 21, 2013 at 12:52PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      hjlodge I'm not sure if I agree. On the one hand, he certainly goes too far with the creepy by showing up unannounced. But as he points out, Hannah does this to him, too, all the time. He definitely has boundary issues, but he didn't seem like an actual threat to her safety, to me.

      January 21, 2013 at 12:55PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Carl K
      Hannah never went into Adams apartment uninvited. There is a difference between showing up and knocking on someones door, when you have been sleeping with that person, and going INSIDE a persons home in the middle of the night, uninvited, when that person has made it clear that she wants to break up with you.

      There is really no comparison whatsoever between these behaviors. Adams behavior was absolutely insane and threatening.

      January 21, 2013 at 2:21PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    hjlodge

    Love the review above and completely agree. There were a lot of things in this episode I found amusing, though there weren't a lot of actual making me laugh aloud moments. My attempt at a review here:

    http://www.kylegoestothemovies.com/2013/01/review-girls-i-get-ideas.html

    January 21, 2013 at 12:53PM EST Reply to Comment
  • A_talkback_profile

    belinda

    That missy elliott line had me literally rolling on the floor with laughter.

    January 22, 2013 at 7:33AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Smirls

    I know you have a special place in your heart for this show Alan but I wish you'd be a bit more objective when reviewing it. At the very least, cut back on the crusading defender bit - it doesn't help make the case you think it does.

    January 22, 2013 at 9:04AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall "Objective" has no place in what I do. Reviewing is by its very nature a subjective act. You don't like the show as much as I do (or at all)? That's fine. But my opinion is my opinion. That's my job.

      January 22, 2013 at 9:11AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Smirls Fair enough. The attempt to undercut arguments that may or may not be made against the show, however, are distracting, at least for me. What I really mean to say is, I wish you'd focus more on the show (subjective or not) and less on it's critics. If, as you say, they don't like the show as much as you, that's fine, but their opinions are their opinions. With a show this polarizing I doubt you'll be changing any.

      January 22, 2013 at 9:43AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      joel Hey Smirls, that might be a fair complaint if the hate aimed at this show wasn't so overwhelmingly intense. Just read the comments for this review alone. People show up week after week only to complain about this show. They don't seem to find anything they like in it, yet they feel they must promote their hate. I think it's fair for Alan to respond to that, because if he ignored it people would complain about that too.

      January 22, 2013 at 1:38PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    snowlarbear

    thought Hannah was actually going to cut her hair (due to the IRL Lena hairstyle). slightly disappointed when her phone rang.

    i wonder if they'll keep teasing that all season.

    January 22, 2013 at 12:54PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Dezbot

    I liked that Hannah was so absorbed in that work-out video that she didn't hear Elijah and George fighting, nor Elijah yelling that he'd had sex with Marnie.

    January 22, 2013 at 1:13PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    KateHakala

    I sort of don't buy the fact that Hannah dumped Sandy because he was a problem. I think it really had to do with the issue that he wasn't readily congratulating her essay. Read more at Nerve: http://www.nerve.com/entertainment/this-week-on-emgirls-em-can-you-love-me-if-you-hate-my-art

    January 22, 2013 at 4:46PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    joshmassey

    Did Hannah break the fourth wall when Jessa made her crack about Clinton? I rewound it a few times, and swear Dunham looked right at the camera for a split second (seemingly on purpose).

    January 24, 2013 at 11:11AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    David

    Alan, you are blinded by this show. You say at least twice in every single review that the characters lack self awareness but the creators don't. WE GET IT. Your defense of the show is heightened to the point of being contradictory. I think you're turning a blind eye to the problems of the show.

    January 27, 2013 at 12:10AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Anna

    HOW has no one even MENTIONED the puppies?! Excuse me, I need to go find a chihuahua that will fit nicely in my cleavage....

    January 28, 2013 at 12:29AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Ricky

    Yesterday I saw this episode. The "talk in the park scene with the dogs" is one of the worst jobs of editing I have seen in TV. At one point Hannah puts a dog inside her shirt, then it seems to be outside, then back inside, then two dogs appear, then no dogs, etc. Horrible job.

    January 28, 2013 at 10:08AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    BigGreenMat

    I notice you mention the writers responding to criticism of their show in this episode. How much do you think it is their own criticism and not from outside sources? For a show so much in it's own head (and from what I have gathered from Dunham's work) I would expect that the creators' own self-criticism is far more scathing and influential than the greater world's.

    January 28, 2013 at 12:56PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web