TV Review: ABC Family's 'Baby Daddy' births few laughs

It's 'Raising Hope,' minus the things that make 'Raising Hope' good

HitFix
C-
Readers
B+
<p>The cast of ABC Family's &quot;Baby Daddy&quot;</p>

The cast of ABC Family's "Baby Daddy"

Credit: ABC Family
If the late English actor Edmund Kean had worked as a 21st Century programming executive, his last words may well have been, "Dying is easy... Developing comedies for young women is hard."
 
Oh, it's easy enough to do comedies for teen and tween female viewers. Disney Channel has been doing it with wild amounts of success for years, launching the careers of starlets like Hilary Duff, Miley Cyrus and Selena Gomez. 
 
But what happens when those viewers get a little older? Do they stop wanting to laugh? 
 
That might be a logical supposition if you look at the comedy slates of the two networks that target women 18-34.
 
The CW has surrendered entirely on comedy. When The WB (which also had comedy issues) merged with UPN, a slew of sitcoms stuck around as part of the latter network's commitment to African-American viewers. As soon as The CW's demographic focus shifted, those comedies were pushed out the door. You think The CW might want those 7-ish million viewers who watch "The Game" now on BET? Sure, but that was never going to happen on The CW. It's been years since The CW last aired a half-hour comedy series.
 
ABC Family, in contrast, keeps trying and trying and trying to do comedy, without any real success. "Melissa & Joey" does reasonably well allegedly, but calling it "generic" would be almost unsustainable hyperbole. "10 Things I Hate About You" was on-brand and well-received by some critics, but it was cancelled after a season. "State of Georgia" had a solid pedigree with Jennifer Weiner creating and Raven-Symone starring, but it also barely rose to the level of mediocre and was cancelled after a season. 
 
It's notable that ABC Family can't do comedy, because the network does drama reasonably well by several standards. It has populist successes like "Secret Life of the American Teenager," young-skewing social media "buzz" hits like "Pretty Little Liars" and with "Switched at Birth" and "Bunheads," it even has a few shows that critics say nice things about.
 
But comedy.
 
Oy.
 
So difficult. 
 
ABC Family's latest comedic whimper is "Baby Daddy," which premieres at 8:30 p.m. on Wednesday (June 20) night and will be forgotten by 9:15. And maybe ABC Family views that as progress, because the pilot for "State of Georgia" was bad enough that it took well over 15 minutes to forget. 
 
"Baby Daddy" has no real point of view, no real comedic voice and one very cute infant. Somebody at ABC Family probably, in fact, views that as a net gain.
 
A few more thoughts, somewhat more specific than "Meh-minus," after the break...
 
"Baby Daddy" has a premise that could politely be described as "thin" and could less politely be described as "DON'T THINK ABOUT THIS TOO HARD OR SOMETHING BAD WILL HAPPEN TO YOUR BRAIN."
 
Ben (Jean-Luc Bilodeau) is a freewheeling New York City bachelor, who shares a tiny apartment with his ill-defined buddy Tucker (Tahj Mowry). They arrive home one day and... BANG! ... There's a baby on their doormat. That's established within literally one minute and 20 seconds, so you can't say that creator Dan Berendsen dilly-dallied to get to business. Conveniently, the arrival of the baby coincides with the arrive of Ben's brother Danny (Derek Theler), a professional hockey player who doesn't make enough money not to move in with his brother and his brother's friend. Oh and this is clearly a great time for Ben to be reintroduced to old pal Riley (Chelsea Kane), who used to be fat, but now looks like Chelsea Kane and still harbors a crush on Ben for absolutely no good reason. [If you're not a "Dancing with the Stars" or "Jonas LA" fan, incidentally, looking like Chelsea Kane is a good thing.]
 
Oh, but back to the baby. She was deposited on the doorstep by an ex-girlfriend or an ex-one-night-stand or... something irrelevant. "Baby Daddy" exists in a universe in which this circumstance plays out and the reaction of all involved parties is something along the lines of, "Well, we *should* put this baby up for adoption, but then we wouldn't have a premise for a show." All deliberations regarding whether or not Ben and his motley group of friends and relatives -- including his mother (Melissa Peterman) -- should actually be raising a child are dispatched in a frenzied five minutes of affectless soul-searching. It's ultimately decided that Ben needs to grow up and therefore forcing this man who shouldn't be entrusted with turtles with the life of a baby girl makes total sense, not because it's best for the kid, but because it's best for Ben and also for wacky hijinks.
 
The legal situation here is never discussed. I'm not exactly sure what Ben's parental rights or responsibilities are, but I'm thinking that, at best, they're "minimal." And at the very least, Child Protective Services plays some role in vetting the otherwise problematic scenario. ABC Family only made the first and third episodes available to critics and between the first episode and the third, I'm assuming that we dealt with issues of paperwork and custody. Since I won't be watching that second episode, I assume there was a scene in which a Social Services Worker -- a stern African-American actress, I'm assuming -- sits down with Ben -- probably wearing the baby duct-taped to his head like a stylishly apple-cheeked, pooping chapeau -- and a Very Serious Talk ensues. 
 
I'd bet it goes something like this...
 
Social Services: You understand that every part of this situation, from your apartment to your employment status to your level of emotional maturity, is unacceptable as grounds for custody?
 
Ben: I don't follow. 
 
Social Services: Well, best case, you're using this baby as a glorified prop for some of the lamest jokes about diaper changing imaginable. Worst case scenario, this probably constitutes reckless endangerment on a near-criminal level.
 
Ben: You make valid points. But I have a dim-witted brother, an ethnically ambiguous roomate and a hot, skinny chick friend who are all equally ill-suited for parenting and they're all gonna help me raise this child. 
 
Social Services: Hmmm. I can see how that might make things better for the baby. Will there be sexual tension?
 
Ben: With the baby?!?!? God no! What do you think this is, "Twilight"?
 
Social Service: I meant with the "hot chick friend."
 
Ben: Oh. Sure, even though she used to be fat.
 
Social Services: That's disappointing, because the mere presence of your baby strapped to your head makes you irresistible to me and all other women, because your baby has a magnetic pull on our ovaries.
 
Ben: I know, RIGHT?!? 
 
Social Services: Maybe it's my woman-hormones talking, but I'm inclined to let this continue. But only for 10 episodes and then we'll re-evaluate.
 
Ben: Episodes?
 
Social Services: Weeks! I meant weeks! Because nothing about this is at all sitcom-y and hackneyed!
 
Ben: Ooops. What's that smell? Somebody made a boom-boom on my head.
 
Social Services [bats her eyelashes]: Oh, YOU! 
 
 
But that's just my assumption.
 
"Baby Daddy" is basically "Raising Hope," minus Greg Garcia's twisted sense of humor, Greg Garcia's sometimes hackneyed warmth, Greg Garcia's detailed sense of place and community and any kind of visual style.
 
Hmmm. 
 
That's being generous, because it ignores how great the cast of "Raising Hope" has been from the very beginning. Bilodeau and Theler are bland, while Peterman and Mowry haven't been given enough character traits to seem interesting on any level. 
 
The only member of the cast who makes a positive impression is Kane, whose perky cuteness and Disney-honed ability to hit a punchline hard at least make her look like a professional on a show of gamely trying amateurs. Kane pops so vividly that you would have thought her "Dancing" success could have led to a similarly thankless role on an equally mediocre, but much more watched, network sitcom. Instead she has the disingenuous task of playing the smoking hot girl with the body of a dancer who gets to be the vehicle for one fat joke after another, the kind of fat jokes that nobody on TV would make this relentlessly around an actual overweight person. [Remember when ABC Family had the sensitive, well-acted show "Huge" in which overweight people were treated as humans? I do. Nobody watched it. That's why ABC Family decided to go this way instead.]
 
I take that back. The baby is very cute. 
 
The baby is also downgraded from "hero prop" to "glorified doorstop" by the second episode, in which the washing of the hockey player's disgusting lucky jersey is more central to the A-story than the little bundle of giggles-and-vomit. In fact, while the first episode was all about Ben saying he isn't ready to raise a baby and everybody deciding raising a baby is the best thing for Ben, the second episode implies that baby-raising has become virtually second nature. I hope that's setting the stage for a finale in which somebody comes and rescues the baby and Season 2 is just about these really boring people being boring in a very, very fake version of New York City.
 
Presumably because "10 Things I Hate About You" failed, "Melissa & Joey" and "State of Georgia" and now "Baby Daddy" have all opted for the cheapest looking, most over-lit multi-cam sets imaginable, with the loudest, most appreciative studio audiences available. Characters can't lean on the walls in these sets, they appear to be so flimsy. Nobody's making long-term commitments to these sets or this show. The thinking appears to be that if these shows don't make you laugh, at least they make you comfortable. Indeed, all of the in-studio warm succeeds in convincing you that even if the baby within the show is probably in constant peril, the actress playing her is warm and safe.
 
I like to say that although ABC Family isn't including me as part of its core demo, I'm able to appreciate the ABC Family shows I like, whether that means genuinely good shows like "Switched at Birth" or summer guilty pleasures like "The Nine Lives of Chloe King." I give every ABC Family show a shot, because some stick. Thus far, no ABC Family comedy has come close to sticking with me and I'm done with "Baby Daddy" after two episodes, same as "State of Georgia" and one more episode than I gave "Melissa and Joey." And no matter how bad these ABC Family comedies are, I'm going to keep writing about them, because I want it to mean something when ABC Family figures out that magic formula. 
 
Keep trying, guys. It can't be that hard to make me and teenage girls laugh.
 
"Baby Daddy" premieres on Wednesday, June 20 on ABC Family.
Dan-feinberg-sm
Daniel Fienberg
Executive Editor
A long-time member of the TCA Board and a longer-time blogger of "American Idol," Dan Fienberg writes about TV, except for when he writes about movies or sometimes writes about the Red Sox. But never music. He would sound stupid talking about music.
Related Searches: TV, review, ABC Family, Baby Daddy

Daniel Fienberg Recaps & Reviews

View By Show »

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Taylor

    Dan...did you ever watch Greek?

    I thought that wasn't just a good comedy for ABC Family but a great comedy for any network. I would even go so far as to say it better captured "Freaks & Geeks in College" than Undeclared.

    Hopefully ABC Family can continue to attempt shows that have such high quality in the comedy sector again.

    June 20, 2012 at 6:47PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Taylor - I watched and liked "Greek" very much. I wouldn't go anywhere near as far as your "Freaks & Geeks" comparison, but I liked it very much. And the reason it's not on the air, sadly, is that it wasn't really on the brand ABC Family was advancing and it couldn't get big enough numbers... Sigh...

      -Daniel

      June 20, 2012 at 7:00PM EST
  • Satan_is_real_talkback_profile

    erika_herzog

    wow this is the snarkiest i've read you be, daniel. i sort of love it....

    have to say that i just watched the pilot and i kept thinking i was on the Disney Channel. this show is on the wrong network, is just all round generic and is as awful as you describe.

    June 21, 2012 at 7:23AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan Erika - Oh come now! That can't possibly be true! [That this is the snarkiest you've seen me be. I wouldn't think this was Top 20...]

      Wouldn't this be too "edgy" for Disney Channel? I mean... Abandoned baby! Hockey!!!!

      -Daniel

      June 21, 2012 at 11:33AM EST
    • i don't know dan.... you cut this show down to size VERY effectively. shudder to think what your top 10 snarkiest would be. ha! :-)

      boy do i abhor the word "edgy". blech. yeah, probably too edgy for Disney Channel, though kids are growing up super fast nowadays, despite being coddled ridiculous amounts. if the huge guy keeps his shirt on maybe, but the chances of that happening and hookups amongst these zeros is pretty high, so....

      June 22, 2012 at 3:03AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    JK

    THANK YOU FOR NAME CHECKING GREG GARCIA. SERIOUSLY. That is literally the only thing I can think about whenever I see an ad for this show - that someone saw the viewership numbers for Raising Hope, did that math and figured out that that would be a big hit on ABC Family, and decided to remake it with a worse cast and worse writers in hopes that the fans would watch it while waiting for Season 3 instead of just catching reruns.

    June 21, 2012 at 11:22AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jenny

    I watched the pilot, and thought it was so much miss and not nearly enough hit. Still I really love Chelsea Kane in this. I have not seen her in anything else, but she definitely stand outs and can do comedy. I don't remember Jean-Luc Bilodeau being so wooden on Kyle X&Y, but here sure was in this pilot. The rest of the cast is bland too.Still I'll give give the show at least three or four episodes just for Chelsea.

    June 21, 2012 at 4:20PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Charlotte

    I was reading your article thinking "Please mention "Raising Hope" in this context!". Thanks for that. I just love that show and it gets overlooked on an "awardly" basis. So glad it still got renewed.
    "Baby Daddy", on the other hand, I'm not gonna watch.

    June 21, 2012 at 5:53PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Tobias

    Am I the only one who thinks, that's the exact same plot as the minor 80s French hit movie Three men and a baby, remade for the US with Tom Sellek and Ted Danson?

    Tobias

    June 24, 2012 at 8:49AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Sareeta

    I found this review since it was linked in your Awkward review. Very funny read, though I never planned on watching this show.

    I'm not a fan of comedies mainly because they rarely make me laugh. I think the problem with ABC Family's comedies is they are trying to be wholesome and family friendly (though their latest shows aren't that wholesome, I guess, considering this one revolves around the product of a one night stand), which somehow translates to really uninspired plots and unfunny performances. As Tobias mentioned, this sounds like a remake of Three Men and a Baby (with younger actors).

    I think they are better off doing more series like Bunheads---45-minute dramas with comedic moments. They don't have to try as hard for laughs and can focus on telling a compelling story.

    June 28, 2012 at 3:31AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Carrie

    It is the worst. It is THE WORST. You should watch the second episode just so you can be even more disgusted.

    June 29, 2012 at 12:16PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan Carrie - You mean the scene I wrote wasn't in the second episode? Darn!

      -Daniel

      June 29, 2012 at 12:30PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Amy

    Okay i'm sorry(really i'm not) but do you have PMS "DAN" i watched this show and its nothing to write THIS about. Come one with movies like "the hang over" which only thrive on perverted jokes why would you go after a show like this. Oh and the people saying " i thought it should be on disney channel", 11 year old girls watch disney and this show may not be gross but it has innuendo so your either a pervert or don't think before you speak.

    August 2, 2012 at 3:46AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Breaking News

Around the Web

News From Our Partners