Cannes Film Festival 2013

'That's My Boy' review: R-rated Adam Sandler still as childish as ever

Andy Samberg, Leighton Meester and Vanilla Ice co-star in the latest example of Happy Madison formula

  • Critic's Rating C-
  • Readers' Rating D
Andy Samberg and Adam Sandler in 'That's My Boy'

Andy Samberg and Adam Sandler in 'That's My Boy'

Credit: Tracy Bennett/Sony

Adam Sandler rarely goes wrong underestimating his audience. There's a mild disappointment like "Jack & Jill" here or an outright flop like "Little Nicky" there, but otherwise Sandler enjoys one of the most commercially consistent careers in Hollywood.

He's at his best when he works with a serious filmmaker on an offbeat project (Paul Thomas Anderson's "Punch-Drunk Love," Judd Apatow's "Funny People"), but he's savvy enough to know that's not what his audience really wants to see, and he doesn't do it often. Instead, his Happy Madison brand continuously cranks out mild variations in the same sub-juvenile strain.

If you've seen one, you've seen them all: funny voices, fart jokes, men getting hit in the testicles, busty women in tight shirts or swimsuits, very young and very old cast members dropping age-inappropriate dialogue, overweight people mocked and celebrated for their size, obnoxious cameos from Sandler buddies like Rob Schneider, Nick Swardson and David Spade, etc. etc. And then, inevitably, a third act wrapped up with a grossly sentimental bow on top. Because in the end every Sandler movie, no matter how stupid, has to have heart.

"That's My Boy" never departs from the template, but does make one minor but important tweak to differentiate it from the rest of Sandler's Happy Madison vehicles: it's rated R. This is Sandler's attempt to crash "The Hangover" party, and it will be interesting to see how his audience responds.

Of course, the movie itself isn't actually any more interesting. Although Sandler is working with a new director -- "Sex Drive" writer-director Sean Anders -- and the film has a little more visual pizazz than the sloppy standard established by Happy Madison favorites Dennis Dugan and Frank Coraci, Sandler's entry into the world of raunch is as middling as you'd expect.

There are signs of an edgier comedy here, and "That's My Boy" is built on a particularly tasteless premise. When Sandler's character Donny Berger was barely a teenager he had a sexual relationship with his teacher (Eva Amurri Martino). The movie treats this like a naughty joke -- young Donny isn't a victim because he's living out the fantasy of sleeping with a hot teacher. And while Amurri is as alluring as ever, watching her hit on adolescent co-star Justin Weaver is awkward and embarrassing at best, utterly repellent at worst. But funny? Nope.

It would take filmmakers considerably sharper than Anders and writer David Caspe (TV's "Happy Endings") to pull this off. Maybe, John Waters could've done it in his prime. Gregg Araki did his most mature work exploring sexual abuse with compassion, complexity and some degree of humor in "Mysterious Skin." No one would expect the same from a Sandler movie, but that probably means a Sandler movie shouldn't even try.

"That's My Boy" uses the teacher-student sex as "outrageous" set-up for a more traditional father-son bonding story. The teacher gets pregnant and Donny grows up into a deadbeat dad -- he was too young and irresponsible to properly raise a kid and the teacher landed in jail when their relationship was discovered. Donny's son (Andy Samberg) distanced himself from dad as soon as possible, changing his name from Han Solo Berger (hilarious, right?) to Todd Peterson and cutting off all communication. Donny has no clue where his kid is, until he sees a wedding issue cover of Parade magazine featuring Todd and fiancée Jamie (Leighton Meester).

This sets Donny on a course to win back his son's affection for reasons both selfish (he stands to make good money if he can sell a reunion with his son and the teacher to a sleazy talkshow) and good-hearted (he loves his boy!). Those motivations will eventually come into conflict with each other, Donny will have to make a choice and... well, even if it's R-rated, a Sandler movie's gotta have heart.

The question is what does a Sandler movie get to have with a R rating? The answer is relatively banal: aside from the teacher-student creepiness, the middle finger becomes a punchline of choice and there's more nudity and sex jokes than usual. Donny frequents a strip club, where the star performer is played by plus-sized fiftysomething comedienne Luenell scantily clad in lingerie and a pair of pasties. There's more flesh-baring comedy throughout -- both male and female, physically fit and not -- and gags involving masturbation, semen and several unconventional sexual relationships. One late breaking twist seems deliberately designed to overshadow the farcical treatment of statutory rape.

The movie earns its R, but there's always something holding it back. I think it's Sandler's genial sensibility. He's never going to be as nasty as Todd Phillips or as warped as Jody Hill and David Gordon Green. He doesn't need to be. But to get interesting, "That's My Boy" could've used less of Sandler's childishness and more of someone willing to push it in a darker, more dangerous direction.

It certainly doesn't gel as a mismatched buddy comedy. Samberg plays Todd as a one-note uptight cuckold -- as much a patsy of Meester's domineering shrew (would you expect any other kind of female lead in a movie like this?), as a victim of his father's absentee parenting. It's a largely dull and irritating performance, which is either a reflection of Samberg's lack of movie star charisma or simply a byproduct of very bad material.

You don't usually walk out of a Sandler movie praising the performances, and that's especially true here. The supporting players range from competent sketch comedy types -- Will Forte, Rachel Dratch, Ana Gasteyer -- to cringeworthy stunt castings -- Milo Ventimiglia as Meester's militant military brother, James Caan as an unruly Irish priest, Vanilla Ice as himself. None of them leave a lasting impression.

Only Sandler is entirely in his element, and he's long ago proven criticism of his man-child schtick irrelevant. You have three choices: Give in and go with the nonsense, pretend that his films have hidden subtext and deep meanings (as Armond White usually does), or simply ignore. Love him or hate him, that's our Sandler.

"That's My Boy" opens in theaters June 15

Geoff-berkshire-sm
Geoff Berkshire
Contributor
Geoff Berkshire lives in Los Angeles and writes about film and television. His work has appeared in Variety, the L.A. Times, and Premiere, among other publications. He is the former national entertainment editor and film critic for Metromix.com.
Trending Now on HitFix Boards
Topic Started By Latest Post Replies
sandylewis90
8 days ago
2
sandylewis90
27 days ago
1
Discuss In Theaters and Coming Soon on HitFix Message Boards »

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    CinemaPsycho

    I'm BEGGING you people. Stop paying to see Sandler's shitty, shitty films. They're only going to get worse. Stop the madness. We got over hair metal, we can get over this.

    June 15, 2012 at 12:51AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      troopermsu I couldn't agree more.

      June 15, 2012 at 3:36PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Dave I

    He's at his best when he works with a serious filmmaker on an offbeat project (Paul Thomas Anderson's "Punch-Drunk Love," Judd Apatow's "Funny People"), but he's savvy enough to know that's not what his audience really wants to see, and he doesn't do it often.

    June 15, 2012 at 10:28AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Dave I Well, maybe not ALL of his audiences. Actually, I suppose I'm NOT his audience. I did like him in "Punch-Drunk Love" and "Funny People." I do not remember what comedies of his I've seen since Happy Gilmore. I'm sure I probably have, they were either forgettable enough that I sincerely do not remember them, or looked stupid enough that I did not want to waste my time. It would be sad if he wanted to do deeper, richer roles like he did in Punch Drunk Love and just kept putting out these types of movies because that seems to be what America wants out of him.

      I also think, in light of the Sandusky trial and what seems like an awful lot of talk about sexual abuse in the news fairly recently, maaaaaaaaybe a comedy about a young child having sex with an adult is a poor idea. At least/especially the way they are portraying it. Yeah, I realize nailing a beautiful woman is the fantasy of most boys, however I am not stupid enough to think it actually works out like some stupid comedy would portray.

      -Cheers

      June 15, 2012 at 10:29AM EST
  • A_monty_talkback_profile

    Monty Jack

    If the movie were about a male teacher having sex with a 13-year-old female student, I doubt it would be played as comedy.

    June 15, 2012 at 4:43PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      mamatiger17 Maybe it was funny, but it was gross funny and more unexpected to see such crudeness like it was portrayed. I was disgusted with it halfway through it.
      It played to the audience it was meant to, men who don't look any further than their adolescent thoughts....
      I usually like Adam Sandler movies, this one is one I did not like and was glad, VERY glad I did NOT pay to see.
      And YES, the story line of a kid with a teacher was very inappropriate and even more so when they portrayed it like he was a hero..... REALLY????

      June 26, 2012 at 5:56PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Bethie

    What a Disgusting movie. Waste of money

    June 18, 2012 at 2:34AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    mjv

    You people need a sense of humor. That shit was funny !!!

    June 22, 2012 at 6:03AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      mamatiger17 It really wasn't all that funny.... and it is sad that the storyline used had to be used.... really????
      Like I said before, if it hit anyone in the audience, it was adolescent minded guys.... that and the fact tthat he never changed for the better really showed that it was meant for that target audience.

      Sad

      June 26, 2012 at 6:17PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    mamatiger17

    My daughter is right about his movies, they are getting worse, not better and 50 First Dates was great, Happy Gilmore was great, this NOT....
    The brother sister scene was stupid and all the stupid jokes and gags were usual, someone said that it was predictable and hearing my boyfriend next to me telling me what may happen next, and then it did proved the predictability...

    BORING and sad..... it could've been made alot ALOT better and with less crudeness...... it didn't really need it

    June 26, 2012 at 6:00PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    InvaderBeth

    You all need to get a sense of humor. this movie was so freaking funny! I can't wait till it comes out on dvd

    August 2, 2012 at 5:20PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Pieman

    you guys are all stupid..its a pretty nice comedy.
    the only thing i think they could have changed is the incest thing,thats pretty much what everyone dislikes.
    This isnt only for adolescent guys,just keep an open mind..
    its as if you put on a serious face when someone makes a joke

    September 29, 2012 at 11:17AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    haha

    The only bad thing about the movie is the incest thing..but aside from that its a good movie.
    you guys just dont know how to enjoy comedies

    September 29, 2012 at 11:19AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Breaking News

Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web