5 suggestions to save Adam Sandler's career
Has his loyalty gone to far?
Adam Sandler at the world premiere of "That's My Boy" earlier this month.
Are you a fan of Breaking News?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Adam Sandler in a tough spot. His latest picture, "That's My Boy," just endured one of the worst opening weekends of his career. Moreover, audiences only gave the picture a B Cinemascore which is a bad sign for its long term prospects. The only silver lining is that reviews for "Boy" were a bit better than "Jack and Jill" last November (which isn't saying much).
While audiences have kept Sandler at the top of the box office consistently since "Billy Madison" 17 years ago, critics have rarely been on board with Sandler's brand of broad comedy. Unfortunately, the overall quality of his films may finally be catching up with him. Many in the industry are blaming the Razzie-winning "Jack and Jill" on the poor debut of "Boy," but it's clearly more of a cumulative effect of forgettable flicks such as "Grown Ups" and "Just Go With It." And, unfortunately, when Sandler has taken chances with a drama such as "Reign Over Me" or a dramedy such as "Funny People" (both films where Sandler received great individual reviews) the disappointing financial results seem to have scared him off from going in a different direction.*
*The one exception being "Punch-Drunk Love." An indie experiment Sandler has shown no intention of exploring again.
At this point, Sandler is currently in production on "Grown Ups 2" which could either temporarily put him back in moviegoers good graces or be another "surprising" disappointment. The 45-year-old is also expected to reunite with Kevin James for the comedy "Valet Guys," but whether the film will be green lit at this point remains to be seen.
Ever since his years on "SNL," Sandler has displayed an every-man charisma and willingness to put himself in embarrassing situations or characters for the benefit of his audience. Not every comedic actor of his generation would be willing to go where he's gone over the years and, even he would likely admit, it hasn't always worked out. Will the shock of "Boy's" performance convince Sandler he needs to make some changes on the creative side? We'd certainly like to think so. Taking all this into account, here are five suggestions we hope Sandler will take to extend his career.
1. Sometimes being too loyal doesn't work in a creative medium
Sandler and his producing partner Jack Giarraputo have a tremendous amount of creative control with the films they make and have consistently pulled from the same pool of directors, actors, screenwriters, costumers, you name it. Sandler tried to go in a different direction on "Boy" with Sean Anders ("Hot Tub Time Machine"), but he's usually in the hands of Dennis Dugan (six and about to be seven times), Peter Segal (three times) and Frank Coraci (three times). It's arguably worse in front of the camera. It's one thing to reunite with Chris Rock or Steve Buscemi, but the consistent use of Kevin James (four times), David Spade, Colin Quinn, Nick Swardson (seven times) and Rob Schneider (11 times) puts a second-rate and increasingly out-of-touch spin on his films. There is something incredibly admirable about providing work for your friends in Hollywood. Especially when you set up and produce smaller commercial films to, um "help" their careers ("Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star," "Grandma's Boy"). To say such loyalty is rare in the movie industry is an understatement, but it's becoming a burden to Sandler's reputation with moviegoers.
2. Don't be afraid to make smaller films again
Outside of "Punch-Drunk Love," Sandler really hasn't delved into independent cinema. "Reign Over Me" was framed as an indie, but had a studio price tag of $20 million and was marketed like a major release. He's spoken previously about how nervous it makes him to star in more dramatic roles (he famously dropped out of Tarantino's "Inglorious Basterds") , but at this point even making an unconventional comedy -- even in a supporting role or ensemble piece -- could really help fuel his creativity. It might even be an eye-opener to filmmakers who may not have considered Sandler open to jumping outside his comfort zone in the past.
3. Better Team-Ups
As noted, Sandler clearly loves working with friends such as James and Rock, but why did we never see him in a movie with Jim Carrey at Carrey's career height? Why hasn't he teamed up with Ben Stiller, Vince Vaughn, Jack Black, Steve Carell or even "SNL" vets such as Will Ferrell or Eddie Murphy? (We're not sure "Boy's" Samberg counts as a star yet.) Sandler was fantastic with Seth Rogen, Jonah Hill and up and comers such as Aubrey Plaza and Aziz Ansari in "People," why didn't he reunite with any of them in his next few films? Or actors of that ilk? One of his biggest hits pitted him against Jack Nicholson ("Anger Management"). Why wouldn't he try an unexpected pairing like that again?
4. Make another Sports flick
One thing that Sandler has been known for is his association to professional sports and films such as "Happy Gilmore" ("Caddyshack" for a younger generation), "The Waterboy" and "The Longest Yard." The latter two wouldn't be considered classics, but from a commercial standpoint they appeal dirtily to his longtime male fan base. A huge NBA fan, Sandler still hasn't made a real basketball comedy yet. Why not now?
5. Don't be afraid to make another R-rated movie
In many ways, teaming up with Samberg in "Boy" and going in an R-rated direction was a "change" from Sandler's recent filmography. Before "Boy," the only other R-rated comedy Sandler had starred in was "Funny People." Studio executives will try to sell Sandler's camp that his audience is so family-friendly he needs to stick to PG-13 films, but ask Eddie Murphy how long that strategy can last creatively. There have been numerous box office blockbusters that were R-rated over the past decade. Sandler's on screen persona should be a perfect fit for the right R-rated edgier material. Perhaps the third time's the charm?
Do you think Sandler can turn the tide? Share your thoughts below.
News From Our Partners
-
Total Recall: Star Trek Movies
Parental Guidance: Star Trek Into Darkness
In Pictures: The Stars of Star Trek Into Darkness
-
The Telefile - Modern Family: The Best Lines of the Night
The Telefile - Fall TV 2013: What's On When
The Telefile - TNT & TBS Upfront 2013: Reaping What Other Networks Sowed
-
What to Watch Tonight: The Office's Big Farewell and the Season Finales of TVD, Elementary, and Five More
The CW's 2013-2014 Schedule: Supernatural Switches Nights Again, The Vampire Diaries Pairs With Reign
Watch the Trailers for The CW's New Series, Including The 100, Star-Crossed, and Reign (VIDEO)
-
'Star Trek Into Darkness': The Reviews Are In!
Emma Watson In 'The Bling Ring': The Early Reviews Are In!
'Star Trek' And Klingon: Learn The Language Of The Aliens!
-
Weekend Movies: 'Star Trek Into Darkness,' 'Black Rock,' and More
Bruce Willis Set for 'Expiration': Actor Will Play Hitman in Next Movie
Emma Watson Says She is in No Rush 'To Be Seen as a Woman'
-
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day One: Sofia Coppola offers the first misfire of the festival
Hear This: A song with a long title succinctly encapsulates ’90s power-pop
Watch This: Laura Palmer lives—however briefly—in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me
-
State of Decay, TMNT Release Dates Leaked by Gamestop
Watch 'The Hangover 3′ Stars Zach Galifianakis and Ken Jeong Perform Stand-Up Together in 1998
'Pacific Rim' Trailer: When Man and Machine Become One
-
One Direction Announce Where We Are Stadium Tour for 2014
Miley Cyrus Wants Everyone to Know She's Still Engaged by Posting This New Pic
Most Anticipated Album Release for June 2013 – Readers Poll



Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupDaffodil
June 18, 2012 at 3:09PM EST Reply to CommentSpanglish seems to be forgotten by critics, but it was a more serious role that Sandler was amazing in. I've been a fan of his crazy, immature comedy since I was in high school, but he really is a talented actor, with a lot of range--when he wants to be.
HeavyRaines17
June 18, 2012 at 3:11PM EST Reply to CommentGreat article, I agree. Still hoping for a sequel to 'Billy Madison' but that's not likely.
And I think you reference Samberg in bullet 4 when you meant Sandler.
Edward
June 18, 2012 at 3:45PM EST Reply to CommentHe simply needs to grow up. He's made a career out of playing adults with arrested development, even his "fans" are fed up and they stayed away in droves. The message couldn't be clearer: GROW UP!. Time to start picking better scripts and more mature roles
Justin Z.
June 18, 2012 at 4:05PM EST Reply to CommentThe problem with Sandler is that he assumes his audiences are sheep. He just figures that if he pumps out something that has his name and production label on it, people will just automatically throw their money at it. Well thankfully, people are finally wising up to his crap.
Some of these points are valid (though I think the R-rated suggestion has potential to go horribly wrong), but I think the main problem is that Adam Sandler is in an arrested development stage of his career. He refuses to evolve his talents or schtick, even when he has shown he is fully capable of doing so. He is afraid to make career changes because he does not want to risk not making lots of money. Why else would he suddenly shift from parodying his career in Funny People to diving back head first into the stuff he was making fun of? He is a coward, or at least that is the impression we get from moves like that.
Look Adam, Robin Williams, Jim Carrey, Jonah Hill and numerous other comedians have proven that sometimes making a bold career move and sticking to it can earn you just as much respect as your usual bag of tricks. Williams and Carrey have also proven, however, that retreating back to your safe zone can more or less kill your career. Don't make their mistake. Stick to your guns and try new things. Take the next Tarantino film, do an indie flick, get rid of the man-child schtick, etc. Just do something to convince people you are not a one-note money grubbing hack because that is what you are selling yourself as now.
Justin Z.
June 18, 2012 at 4:06PM EST Reply to CommentThe problem with Sandler is that he assumes his audiences are sheep. He just figures that if he pumps out something that has his name and production label on it, people will just automatically throw their money at it. Well thankfully, people are finally wising up to his crap.
Some of these points are valid (though I think the R-rated suggestion has potential to go horribly wrong), but I think the main problem is that Adam Sandler is in an arrested development stage of his career. He refuses to evolve his talents or schtick, even when he has shown he is fully capable of doing so. He is afraid to make career changes because he does not want to risk not making lots of money. Why else would he suddenly shift from parodying his career in Funny People to diving back head first into the stuff he was making fun of? He is a coward, or at least that is the impression we get from moves like that.
Look Adam, Robin Williams, Jim Carrey, Jonah Hill and numerous other comedians have proven that sometimes making a bold career move and sticking to it can earn you just as much respect as your usual bag of tricks. Williams and Carrey have also proven, however, that retreating back to your safe zone can more or less kill your career. Don't make their mistake. Stick to your guns and try new things. Take the next Tarantino film, do an indie flick, get rid of the man-child schtick, etc. Just do something to convince people you are not a one-note money grubbing hack because that is what you are selling yourself as now.
Rev. Slappy
June 18, 2012 at 5:00PM EST Reply to CommentHere's what he should do: shutter Happy Madison completely and only work with A list talent. He can't possibly need the money at this point. He's proven he can act when he works with top talent. My guess is he doesn't care about the kinds of crap he's making.
Also, nostalgia is a terrible thing -- his early movies were awful too.
brokencontender
June 18, 2012 at 5:16PM EST Reply to CommentSander needs to start working with more directors like Paul Thomas Anderson again. I would love to see him cast in a gritty scorsese movie. No more poorly written comedies please, 8 was enough. Come on buddy, move on while your young. Your much to talented for that shit, haven't you proved that to yourself by now?
Angel Torres
June 18, 2012 at 5:44PM EST Reply to CommentIf u are a fan of an actor, regardless of reviews, or the type of actor whether it's action drama or comedy, you will watch. I have seen every movie from the beginning and will not stop because of bad box office or reviews. he is my favorite comedian and always will be
Levi Reply to comment... heck yeah I agree 100 percent I have scene all of his movies and I like them all I own all of them b size that my boy bc it's not on dvd yet
June 19, 2012 at 12:23PM ESTMulderism
June 18, 2012 at 6:17PM EST Reply to CommentThere's an interesting take on Sandler with respect to "Jack and Jill". If you have 40 minutes to kill it is worth a watch. I like these guys.
http://redlettermedia.com/half-in-the-bag/jack-and-jill/
Basically what they are saying is that Sandler is just raking in money for him and his buddies while doing the least amount of work possible.
Joe W
June 18, 2012 at 8:57PM EST Reply to CommentI don't think it's a question of "can he change the tide" but rather, does he want to? Movies like "Jack & Jill" convince me that he probably sits around the dinner table and has his kids pitch him movie ideas -- "Daddy, you should do a movie where you're a girl!" "Oh my god that would be SO FUNNY!"
I don't know how else you explain it. You'd think an actor who never has to worry about making movies for the paycheck would want to take more creative risks because he can. That's why, like Eddie Murphy, I don't think he cares about being creatively interesting.
mw
June 18, 2012 at 10:33PM EST Reply to CommentDon't try to save his career. He is a hateful troll who harbors bottomless contempt for his audience. Let him just fade away.
mw
June 18, 2012 at 10:34PM EST Reply to CommentDon't try to save his career. He is a hateful troll with bottomless contempt for his audience. He needs to just go away.
Monty Jack
June 19, 2012 at 8:29AM EST Reply to CommentThe only thing that can save Sandler's career is to stop making movies, period. The man has NEVER, EVER been funny or appealing (aside from Punch Drunk Love, and that was all PTA).
Levi
June 19, 2012 at 12:31PM EST Reply to CommentYou guys don't know what your talking about that my boy was funny I laugh my but off adam sandler is one of my favorite actors I own all his movies so far and I will always watch his movies and buy them he is one funny man
Jimbo Adam, get off this post man. 1 comment out of 5000 is not going to make a difference.
June 20, 2012 at 11:21AM ESThap You need to grow up. Aren't you tired of being 12?
August 22, 2012 at 11:01AM ESTASFan
June 19, 2012 at 3:05PM EST Reply to CommentWith the exception of idea number 2, in case you haven't noticed yet, he's in talks to do Three Mississippi with Will Ferrell, which as of this moment is a Gary Sanchez production, is a sports flick, teams him up with the more capable Ferrell, and could possibly be R-rated.
ASFan
June 19, 2012 at 3:06PM EST Reply to CommentAnd also, he's not doing Valet Guys with Kevin James. Kevin Hart is now taking Sandler's place.
troopermsu
June 20, 2012 at 2:06AM EST Reply to CommentIf he wants to pair with somebody new and is willing to give up some of the creative control, he could pair with Louis CK and could be something special. I wish he'd do more like 'Funny People'.
whatjj@bellsouth.net
June 20, 2012 at 11:30AM EST Reply to CommentI got great plot. Email me Adam.
whatjj@bellsouth.net
whatjj
June 20, 2012 at 11:32AM EST Reply to CommentI have a great plot, a twist on a earlier comedy.
ASFan
June 20, 2012 at 3:03PM EST Reply to CommentSo does nobody really know about Three Mississippi?
Michael
June 22, 2012 at 3:54PM EST Reply to CommentThe truth of the matter is, Adam Sandler is rich as fuck. He's worth like 350 million. He could quit right now and still live more lavishly then any of us could dream of. So to him making movies is more of a habit or hobby now than it is for economic reasons. Which is probably also why he isn't as great as he was before. He is not making his mark on the world, he has made it. He is one of the trail blazers for the entertainment industry and in spite of all that, it is only natural that he won't remain on top forever.
shove72
July 17, 2012 at 3:29PM EST Reply to CommentHe's still the guy in the tollbooth from "Big Daddy" - got a lot of talent and creativity, but he does what makes HIM happy, and couldn't care less about his critics. I call that success. Go Adam!!!!!
Megan
July 18, 2012 at 9:18PM EST Reply to CommentSandler and his loyal sidekicks don't seem to be in the least concerned about quality anything , so much so, a flop could be considered their trademark.
Jaysus
July 20, 2012 at 9:44AM EST Reply to CommentI pretty much enjoy everything he does. Those movies aren't that bad, even Jack and Jill was funny and entertaining. He hasn't changed at all. The problem is other people who want him to make the same movie everytime. I say let him do whatever he wants, he's an expert in the field, not any critics or movie goers. If he changes his formula, he will ruin everything. He's great in everything. He should have to walk on water twice just to make a point.
Jaysus Shouldn't I mean
July 20, 2012 at 9:45AM EST