Cannes Film Festival 2013

Stylish action-packed final trailer promises 'A Good Day To Die Hard'

Could this be that rare part five that actually delivers?

<p>Bruce Willis and Jai Courteney play father and son with a knack for trouble in 'A Good Day To Die Hard'</p>

Bruce Willis and Jai Courteney play father and son with a knack for trouble in 'A Good Day To Die Hard'

Credit: 20th Century Fox

Are you a fan of Motion Captured?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

What surprises me most about the latest trailer for "A Good Day To Die Hard" is that it actually looks like director John Moore has finally grown a sense of visual style.

Moore has been an in-house favorite for Fox for a while, but I don't get it.  "Behind Enemy Lines," "Flight of the Phoenix," "The Omen," and especially "Max Payne" are all borderline unwatchable, and he seems positively ham-handed when it comes to performance and text.  It's not enough to occasionally nail a pretty picture, and I'd argue that even in that department, he's seemed deficient so far.

This new trailer for the fifth "Die Hard" film is probably the longest coherent piece of film to ever have Moore's name attached to it, which is incredibly encouraging.  I think this is actually a pretty tremendous trailer overall.  Jai Courtney handled himself well in "Jack Reacher," and I like the chemistry between him and Bruce Willis in the quick glimpses we see here.  By the time most series reach a fifth film in a series, the juice is long since gone, but "Fast Five" absolutely revitalized that series, so it is possible.

This also seems to be a "Die Hard" sequel that acknowledges just how preposterous it is that John McClane continues to find himself in these situations.  When it's James Bond, we understand as an audience that he is given these missions because he is the person most qualified to handle them.  When it's the Impossible Missions team, same thing… they are assigned a task, and we watch them tackle it.  With McClane, though, it's all about coincidence and bad timing and dumb luck, and each sequel pushes that level of incredulity just a little bit further.  I thought the last film did a really weak job of dealing with that, treating McClane like a superhero.  Here, it looks like McClane is visiting his son in Russia, and it's because of his son that he ends up entangled in the situation.  That's all I ask… just a nod to the underlying premise, something that helps me swallow the impossibility.


There are some great big action images in the trailer, and that last bit in particular with the McClanes falling, is all kinds of cool.  It looks to me like we've got a lot of fun in store when "A Good Day To Die Hard" hits theaters on February 14, 2013.

Drew-mcweeny-sm
Drew McWeeny
Film Editor
A respected critic and commentator for fifteen years, Drew McWeeny helped create the online film community as "Moriarty" at Ain't It Cool News, and now proudly leads two budding Film Nerds in their ongoing movie education.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    blake

    I don't understand the positive response this trailer is getting. I mean there's lots of explosions. I don't see whats interesting besides that,

    January 3, 2013 at 8:48PM EST Reply to Comment
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew Maybe it's just my fear of how bad a John Moore film can be that's making this look like a huge relief.

      January 3, 2013 at 11:50PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ushaped I'd argue the premise is preposterous when our hero doesn't seemed too concerned about a situation. A Die Hard movie should have McClane wondering how he's going to what he needs to do and than improvising a solution. It's a little deflating when he's given an arsenal to play with. I understand that making his adversary have a private army would at some point be a choice in this series. I'm hoping he uses more stealth and ingenuity this time out. It's when he does this that his snarky catch phrases have any weight. McClane is supposed to be an annoying distraction who will just not die.

      January 4, 2013 at 12:24PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Chris

    The style still looks too superhero-y for a "Die Hard" movie to me, but I like that Bruce Willis seems to be bringing more of the wiseass back to McClane. He was way too stoic in much of LFODH, and it's really the attitude that helps sell McClane more than the action. As long as he's a wiseass New York cop in over his head, it's a "Die Hard" movie. The final shot--the one with them falling--just feels too stylish, though, for "Die Hard." But I'm such a fan of the character, that I'll give it a shot, even though I've been burned before.

    January 3, 2013 at 9:58PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Getnuts_talkback_profile

    mridge1

    If they make a 6th, I'd love to Gareth Evans get a shot at the directing duties. Bring the franchise back to what the original did so well, a raw and gritty action flick.

    January 3, 2013 at 10:51PM EST Reply to Comment
  • A_monty_talkback_profile

    Monty Jack

    Moore's Flight Of The Phoenix remake, "borderline unwatchable"? I think that's a really, really good movie, myself, stylish and engaging, with a great cast. Even his Omen remake, unnecesary and rote as it was, had some elegant visuals.

    January 3, 2013 at 11:49PM EST Reply to Comment
    • All_purpose_icon_talkback_profile

      drew Wow. I don't remember finding anything to like in either of those, and when I recently stumbled across about 40 minutes of "Max Payne," I was outright horrified.

      January 3, 2013 at 11:51PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      murphy I agree. "Max Payne" and "The Omen" were fucking terrible, but I thought "Flight of the Phoenix", while an unnecessary remake, was pretty decent and made great use of Massive Attack songs and had some teriffic action sequences. "Behind Enemy Lines" is marred by way too much shaky-cam, but Moore's use of sound in that movie and his short action beats worked pretty well overall. Definitely not unwatchable.

      January 4, 2013 at 10:50AM EST
  • Batboy_talkback_profile

    Rev. Slappy

    I think this looks dreadful. It amazes me that nobody at Fox understands what made the first Die Hard special -- it wasn't spectacle.

    January 4, 2013 at 2:51AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Mark Exactly. John McTiernan is Die Hard, no point in anybody else maing it, as Renny Harlin and Len Wiseman proved.

      January 7, 2013 at 7:18AM EST

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web