Richard Matheson's 'The Incredible Shrinking Man' may be heading back to the big screen
The iconic genre writer is set to co-write the new version with his son
Just one of the many things you have to look forward to if you accidentally wander into a radioactive cloud.
Are you a fan of Motion Captured?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Richard Matheson deserves his status as one of the biggest names in genre history, a phenomenal writer who would be a legend if only for his work on "The Twilight Zone," where he helped define the series as much as Rod Serling did. He wrote some of the very best original films for television, like Steven Spielberg's "Duel" and "The Night Stalker" and the wildly effective "Trilogy Of Terror." His novels have been adapted to the screen by him as well as other writers, and it seems like every few years, someone takes a new crack at "I Am Legend," one of his most widely-read works.
Adapting one of his own books was what got Matheson into movies in the first place. He turned his novel The Shrinking Man into a script, and Jack Arnold turned that script into "The Incredible Shrinking Man," one of the great science-fiction films of the '50s. There is a powerful sadness to Matheson's story, something that is a big part of his entire body of work. He finds the melancholy in these high concepts he creates, and that's one of the reasons I think his work pierces in a way that many genre films don't. Check out his "Somewhere In Time" for a great example of that. Just a few years ago, one of his short stories was the inspiration for "Real Steel."
Both of his sons have gone on to writing careers of their own. Chris Matheson co-wrote "Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure," for example, and Richard Christian Matheson wrote several episodes of "Masters Of Horror" as well as the cult '80s comedy "Three O'Clock High." With his dad, he co-wrote a script called "Face-Off" that ended up becoming the film "Loose Cannons." They've written together on and off over the years, and now it looks like things are coming full-circle as they have just set a deal to write a new version of "The Incredible Shrinking Man" at MGM.
Normally, I'd be irritated by the news, but two things complicate the reaction. First, Matheson and Matheson are writing the script together, which automatically validates whatever new approach they're considering. If anyone has the right to play around with the idea and reconfigure it, it's the original author, and I'm curious to see what the 87 year old version of Matheson wants to do with his story. In today's story about the film at the Hollywood Reporter, they indicate that they will keep the tone of the original. If so, it's a fairly bleak take on what would happen if you just kept shrinking, unabated. The first film was, as many of the science-fiction and horror films of the decade were, a piece that tapped into the paranoia of the atomic age. The Mathesons will evidently bring in newer tech ideas for the new film, like nanotechnology, and they're describing it as "an existential action movie." I can't imagine that means they'll jettison character and mood in favor of action, but rather that the film will make the very act of survival in a world where you don't fit into a very visceral struggle.
The other reason I'm not immediately worried is because they've threatened to remake this film before. In fact, it feels like Imagine and Universal have been working to make this one happen for decades now, as long as I've been living in Los Angeles. I'm just glad they're not going to be going the comedy route, as that was the plan for quite a while.
Whatever happens with this one, I'm just curious to see how they're going to handle the material, because the original film holds a very special place in the science-fiction canon.
News From Our Partners
-
The Telefile - TV on DVD: Tuesday, May 21, 2013
The Telefile - Veep: The Episode's Best Insults
The Telefile - Saturday Night Live: Straight Outta 8H
-
Seth MacFarlane's Next Film: 'Every Line Is Hilarious,' Amanda Seyfried Swears
'The Wolverine' Trailer: Five Questions It Answered
'Star Trek Into Darkness' Takes Box-Office Crown With $84 Million
-
In Pictures: The Cars of Fast & Furious
Digital Multiplex: Warm Bodies and Aftershock
Discover the Best-Reviewed Films in Summer Movie Scorecard 2013
-
Xbox One Will Require Daily Internet Connection
'Hannibal' "Trou Normand" Preview: Is Will Losing His Mind?
Quantum Break Trailer: Remedy Returns With Xbox One Exclusive
-
GIFS: 10 TV Housekeepers That Ran The Show
Megan Smolenyak: Celebrity Roots Series "Who Do You Think You Are?" Returns
This Is Going To Be AMAZING
-
Is 'Jurassic Park 4' a Reboot? Yes, According to Sam Neill
'Return of the Jedi': 25 Things You Didn't Know About the Original 'Star Wars' Trilogy Finale
Melissa McCarthy Fires a 'Tammy' Extra for Mistreating Her Child
-
Hear This: An early Walkmen song gets anti-nostalgic
Watch This: Thunder Road is one of the first, and finest, automotive action movies off the Hollywood lot
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day Six: Michael Douglas plays Liberace in Steven Soderbergh’s swan song, Behind The Candelabra
-
What to Watch Tonight: SYTYCD, Awkward., and the Finales of Grimm, The Game, and DWTS
7 Lessons We Learned from the 2012-2013 TV Season
The Big C Series Finale Review: And They Lived Happily Ever After
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
As the series shifts focus and winds down, we talk to the main trio about returning one last timeWednesday, May 22, 2013
-
One of the film's biggest ideas is explained more clearlyTuesday, May 21, 2013
-
Let's see what sort of boners fall out of Tobias's mouth this timeTuesday, May 21, 2013
-
The final film in the trilogy changes the way we look at the seriesTuesday, May 21, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupThat Werewolf Guy
February 13, 2013 at 2:31PM EST Reply to CommentI remember when Eddie Murphy was attached to the remake.
Bad Seed
February 13, 2013 at 3:11PM EST Reply to CommentWhile bleak in charting the hero's removal from reality, I always thought the story and movie possessed a beautiful transcendence, a real metaphysical promise of hope, in the ending it provided. The only other time I've come across something like this is the NZ film THE QUIET EARTH. In both cases the heroes have lost much that would make them materially happy, but have gained something that allows them to have purpose well beyond the scope of any other human being. In case you didn't guess, I love this kind of ending. Here's hoping they don't stray too far from it.
jeves23 The ending is a real surprise the first time through, and takes what could have been a silly story and turns it into something contemplative and enduring. I wish more films had the courage to be as daring and challenging.
February 13, 2013 at 3:42PM ESTjeves23
February 13, 2013 at 3:40PM EST Reply to CommentI read the book several years ago when I first "discovered" Matheson and read through a large section of his work. I was a big fan of the adventure, but also the melancholy and the metaphysical, and the ultimate hope that came through at the end. I was impressed when I finally caught up with the film that it retained a similar spirit. With the two Matheson's working on this new version, I am confident that whatever they come up with will be worthwhile and true to the spirit of the original.
Hopefully MGM sees fit to actually make that film and not turn it into a hollow, generic exercise with a visionless director at the helm.
Franko
February 13, 2013 at 4:41PM EST Reply to CommentASTONISHING
Fawst
February 14, 2013 at 2:24PM EST Reply to CommentBill & Ted's Excellent Adventure and Three O'Clock High are two of the greatest cult classics of the 80's. That's pretty impressive stuff.
vp19
February 19, 2013 at 9:46AM EST Reply to CommentI hope this version hews more closely to Matheson's novel than the original film did -- not that Arnold didn't do a fine job, but there were some elements of the book that were altered or ignored. (For example, Scott and Louise Carey had a daughter in the novel.) Scott also continuously shrinks in the book, whereas the '57 film had him go from full size to a brief stop at half-size, then to doll size and ultimately one inch (one guesses this was done to lessen the need for oversize sets). One of the most chilling scenes in the book not used in the film came when a child-sized Scott goes for a walk alone one night and is almost brutally beaten by a group of teen delinquents. Finally, the book dwells on Scott's sexual frustration as he diminishes (his wife apparently chooses to stop having relations with him once he's down to 40 inches, and orders twin beds), a theme the film covers only peripherally.