Review: Long-awaited film version of 'Les Miserables' delivers huge emotion
While not everything works, there is real beauty and power to the film
- Critic's Rating B+
- Readers' Rating B+
Anne Hathaway will break your heart. Period.
Are you a fan of Motion Captured?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Alain Boublil and Claude-Michel Schonberg certainly did not need for a film adaptation of "Les Miserables" to happen to validate the work. After all, this is one of the most successful stage productions of all time, omnipresent for over over two decades, beloved and still relevant. There was a point in Hollywood history where any successful stage musical was automatically brought to the screen in the most lavish possible fashion, but that hasn't been true for many years now. Musicals, like Westerns, are increasingly rare, and Hollywood is no longer turning out performers who are automatically at home singing and dancing in front of the camera. For Tom Hooper, following up "The King's Speech" was going to be tough no matter what, and I'll give him credit for ambition. He called his shot and swung for a home run, and while he didn't knock it out of the park, the material itself is so strong, and the film's cast is so game, that it doesn't matter.
The script by Alain Boublil, Jean-Marc Natel, James Fenton and William Nicholson is very faithful to the original stage production, which plays almost as a highlights reel of Victor Hugo's novel. There is a sort of runaway train quality to the narrative, and the film maintains that same breakneck pace from the visually arresting opening moments to the final haunting moments. There is a feeling at times that things move so quickly and with such unrelenting pace that it's hard to catch your breath, hard to let yourself fully experience a beat emotionally, but that's the production itself. It's just inherent to how they've told the story. And while there are certainly things about the film that make full use of the difference between stage and screen, this still feels like a fairly intimately scaled story considering the time span it covers and the huge cast of characters involved.
The film opens with a shot underwater, looking up at a faded French flag floating on the surface, as the camera moves in on it, then past it, breaking the surface to reveal a giant ship being pulled into a shipyard, racing down the giant ropes held taut by long lines of prisoners, finally finding one prisoner in particular, a man worn gaunt by hard labor. Hugh Jackman has finally found a film role that allows him to use his undeniable gifts as a song and dance man, and every bit of his musical theater training comes into play in his work as Jean Valjean. He easily conveys the turbulent inner life of Valjean, and he looks like a guy who is just barely holding it together physically. The opening movement of the film is all about his relationship with Javert (Russell Crowe), a policeman who believes firmly that criminals never change. When Valjean is given his parole, Javert reminds him that he will always be marked by his crimes, that he will never truly be free again. Valjean tries to establish his new life, tries to find legitimate work, but as long as he carries his papers as a criminal, no one is going to let him forget and no one is going to trust him. When he find solace and shelter one night in a church, all of that anger and hurt that he's built up expresses itself in one impulsive act. He takes as much silver as he can and he flees, not really thinking his way through his actions. He is caught almost immediately and hauled back to face the Bishop (Colm Wilkinson) that he stole from, and he is stunned when the Bishop confirms his story, telling the police that all of the silver was a gift, going so far as to add the candlesticks that Valjean missed the first time. He tells Valjean that this is his chance to truly start over, and Valjean takes that chance.
Once Valjean realizes what role he played in Fantine's fate, he vows to rescue her daughter and raise her well, leading to the film's second big jump forward in time as Cosette goes from charming little girl, played by Isabelle Allen, to fetching young woman, played by Amanda Seyfried. The entire time, Javert keeps crossing back into the life of Valjean, who is determined to preserve his hard-won freedom, while civil unrest and a growing sense of revolution plays out as the backdrop for this story of lies and redemption. Cosette falls in love with Marius (Eddie Redmayne), the same young revolutionary that Eponine (Samantha Barks) carries a torch for, and as the personal stories come to a head, so does the revolution, allowing for big sweeping numbers as well as small personal songs. It's a huge canvass, which makes it feel a little odd at times that we see the same few blocks of Paris over and over. I understand shooting on soundstages so that you can preserve the live performances of the actors, but it feels like Hooper didn't quite open the world up enough at times.
It's interesting to see very different performance styles up against each other in the film. Jackman, as I said, is at home here, and he gives a wonderful performance as Valjean. He plays the anger, the sorrow, the brief moments of joy, all with nuance and skill, and his voice is fantastic. Eddie Redmayne is probably the big revelation of the film, and he has a great singing voice as well. Seyfried is very pretty as Cosette, and she's got a sweet little trill of a voice, but as is often the case with "the love interest," she's very underwritten, and it's a tough role to make interesting. Samantha Barks actually fares better with her brief turn as Eponine, and much of the cast scores even in small moments. Perhaps the most controversial casting decision in the film was Russell Crowe, and it's true that he doesn't have the same sort of musical theater background as Jackman. When Crowe sings, he tends to plant himself on a mark and just sort of belt it at the back wall, and I like this big baritone rock'n'roll voice. I think it's appropriate that he sounds very different than anyone else in the film, since Javert stands apart from everyone else in the film, driven by his duty. The problem in Javert's two big songs, though, is that when Crowe goes stationary, Hooper seems to think that's his cue to make his camera work even harder, swooping around Crowe frantically.
That's perhaps the film's one big problem: Hooper often overwhelms the material with his approach. He is not afraid of bombast, but when you go that big, you can lose the human heart of what you're doing. The best thing he does is when he gets close to his performers, creating an intimacy that can't happen on stage. When he goes for big and sweeping, though, it sometimes feels like he isn't quite sure what to do with his frame or how to make things work on that big canvas. I also think his choice to hire Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter to play the Thenardiers is sort of a disaster, as they appear to be beamed in from another movie. Broad and hammy and relentlessly vulgar, they have two big numbers, and I don't think either one really works. They're a minor speed bump, though. For the most part, I think the film does a nice job of sustaining a specific energy and tone.
Tech credits are strong throughout, including Danny Cohen's cinematography and the digital effects used to build out the world around the sets are stylized and lovely. For many audiences, this will become the definitive version of the musical, and I think it is a very strong production overall. While I think it reveals some of Hooper's weaknesses as a filmmaker, it plays to enough of his strengths that it looks like the long wait to bring this to the screen paid off. "Les Miserables," like many musicals, is ultimately about emotion, and that's the one thing that comes through loud and clear here. When it all comes down to the singing, the communication of these grand, sweeping passions in song, "Les Miserables" connects and connects and connects again, and on that level, it has to be called a triumph.
"Les Miserables" opens in theaters everywhere on Christmas Day.
News From Our Partners
-
A Final 'Office' Farewell
Stefon Marries Anderson Cooper In Final Show
Creed Bratton: Closing Creed Thoughts
-
'Anchorman 2' Trailer Had Us At 'Hello': Watch Now!
Fiery 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Scene Hurt The Most: Ouch!
How Far Will 'Star Trek Into Darkness' Boldly Go At Box Office?
-
'Doctor Who' Season 8 Confirmed, Steven Moffat to Return
The Wrap Up: Behind-the-Scenes Image from 'Godzilla' Shows a Train in Peril
Batman: Arkham Origins Will See the Return of Kevin Conroy
-
Box Office Guru Wrapup: Star Trek Softer Than Expected at #1
Weekly Ketchup: Will Smith to Star in Wild Bunch Remake?
Critics Consensus: Star Trek Into Darkness is Certified Fresh
-
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day Four: The Coen brothers return to the festival with a folk-rock flashback
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day Three: Cheers for the young stars of The Selfish Giant, jeers for the new films by Hirokazu Kore-eda and Arnaud Desplechin
Watch This: With Beavis And Butt-head Do America, Mike Judge skewered the idiocy of cinematic adventures
-
Carly Rae Jepsen's 'Call Me Maybe' Captures Top Digital Song Honor at 2013 Billboard Music Awards
Macklemore + Ryan Lewis Win Best Rap Song for 'Thrift Shop' at 2013 Billboard Music Awards
2013 Billboard Music Awards Gets a Tour From Taylor Swift's '22′ Performance [Video]
-
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - Modern Family: The Best Lines of the Night
The Telefile - Fall TV 2013: What's On When
-
FTW vs. WTF: The TV Week in Review (May 19)
Doctor Who "The Name of the Doctor" Review: The Impossible Girl Made Possible
What to Watch This Weekend: The Season Finales of Nikita, Doctor Who, The Simpsons, and Family Guy
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
The director's next film promises to be packed with talentSunday, May 19, 2013
-
This is one you'll want to watch as soon as you've seen the movieFriday, May 17, 2013
-
Plus we look back at a more spirited encounter with the comic actorThursday, May 16, 2013
-
The Channing Tatum/Mila Kunis science-fiction action movie is shooting nowThursday, May 16, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupPlayhouse
December 7, 2012 at 2:02PM EST Reply to CommentThe Thenadiers have, in many ways, always felt out of place in the proceedings with their greed and vulgarity, but some of that has been by design, both in Hugo's novel and in the stage show. Still, you are casting a very particular feel with both Cohen and Carter, so I can easily picture how it could tip over into something overwhelmingly broad.
As for Hooper, much as I enjoyed 'The King's Speech', I kind of had a similar reaction to his work there that you have here. He's competent and has wonderful moments but doesn't quite make it over that hump into brilliance. (In the race for Best Director Oscar, I felt like many people could have directed 'TKS' while Fincher was the only one who could've directed 'The Social Network' and got robbed there, for whatever awards actually mean in the long-run.) Still, the more I see of this film, the more I'm fascinated by it.
As the show is traditionally sung-through, I'm interested to see how the variations in intention and presentation of the songs create a unique experience on the screen.
Max
December 7, 2012 at 2:32PM EST Reply to CommentI will never understand the appeal of this story. It's arguably the most depressing book ever written, turned into one of the most depressing musicals ever made. Seeing this on Christmas (the most depressing time of year) would be enough to make me go home and eat a bullet.
I'm not denying it's a good story, it's very well written and the musical is one of the best musicals ever made, no argument.
It's just so fucking depressing. And I have to take my fiance to go see this on Christmas.
Fuck you, Hollywood! Why couldn't this have come out in January? January is naturally depressing. Perfect fit!
Zack Well, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that this is a depressing story. If anyone's trying to insult the story by saying its depressing, that isn't an insult--especially when the title translates to The Miserable.
December 7, 2012 at 8:30PM ESTMax But, it's on Christmas. I already gotta deal with all the family bullshit. Why does this have to come out on Christmas? I hate my life and my job and now this has to pile on! I'm telling you, I'm getting anal that night or I'm not getting married. That's all there is to it!
December 7, 2012 at 10:46PM ESTCinemaPsycho You could always wait until January to see it. It'll probably still be in theaters. Problem solved.
December 8, 2012 at 3:55AM ESTgpak Have you seen it? I'm not asking to challenge your opinion, but just to better understand where you're coming from. It is indeed a depressing story and tragedy comes from every character and every angle, but the undeniably true beauty of it (as undeniable as it is miserable) is that so long as the items expressed in the movie's tagline exist, neither fight, dreams, love, nor hope will ever die. And in this revelation, we can see that while life can by all means be miserable in its defining attributes, the more insubstantial things, like those wills listed above, can assure us that "even the darkest night will end and the sun will rise."
December 9, 2012 at 4:08AM ESTAli M. I actually think it's one of the most uplifting stories ever written. At its core it's about law vs. gospel, stagnancy vs. change, damnation vs. redemption, and the latter wins out in almost every case – physical deaths notwithstanding. Valjean is my favorite literary character of all time because his inner battle with himself is fierce, and embodies the battles all of us face with ourselves as human beings. To take the higher, selfless path, or to satisfy and protect our own interest. But Valjean takes the higher path every single time, not only showing the ideal of humanity in action, but living up to it. IMO the whole story can be summed up in one key line of the musical: "To love another person is to see the face of God."
December 9, 2012 at 5:26PM ESTTish Somebody's a lucky girl.
December 10, 2012 at 5:15PM ESTDezbot
December 7, 2012 at 3:46PM EST Reply to CommentI was curious as to how Crowe sounds as I haven't seen any of his singing in the previews I've seen for the film. It made me wonder if they had to auto-tune him!
Ann The studio released 5 clips from Les Mis. One of the clips is from the opening prologue between Javert and valjean. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8WSysB5vKM
December 7, 2012 at 4:41PM ESTBananaman Haven't you ever heard of 30 Odd Foot of Grunts? That's probably a good thing though.
December 8, 2012 at 12:57AM ESTDezbot Yeah, I've got a TOFOG album and have seen them live. He's not a great live singer; hence, the auto-tune comment.
December 9, 2012 at 1:39AM ESTBrad
December 7, 2012 at 3:49PM EST Reply to CommentLes Miserables does not take place during the French Revolution. Most of the action takes place during the uprisings of 1848 which swept throughout Europe.
Ryan Sorry but you are wrong. It takes place during the 1832 revolution
December 7, 2012 at 4:27PM ESTVince Wrong as well. The revolutionary activity is set during the 1830s (specifically the backlash to the July Revolution of 1830).
December 7, 2012 at 4:31PM ESTI'm glad I could be 'that guy'.
Vince Dammit, Ryan, you usurped my efforts to be 'that guy'. Serves me right.
December 7, 2012 at 4:34PM ESTfilmboy
December 7, 2012 at 3:57PM EST Reply to CommentI am glad to read you liked the film Drew. This is one of my most anticipated films of this year. I have never had the pleasure of seeing the musical on stage, but my wife has. So, this will be my first time seeing it period.
I have read Victor Hugo's novel and have seen the previous film adaptations of the novel itself. But the musical was always the one I wanted to see but never did.
I think the cast that Hooper has is fantastic and I applaud him for casting Crowe as Javert. I also thank him for not putting Taylor Swift anywhere near this production. There were rumors early on that she was a frontrunner for a role in the film (Cosette most likely) and I am glad that never came to pass.
My Christmas night will be spent watching this on the biggest screen I can find. Can't wait.
Megalodon
December 7, 2012 at 6:08PM EST Reply to CommentDrew, do you know how many, if any, numbers were cut from the stage show? I haven't actually seen the stage production from beginning to end, so I certainly don't know anything by heart, but I know other film adaptations have made plenty of subtractions or substitutions to their musicals, likely for the sake of brevity. (Or sometimes no reason at all; The Wiz comes to mind.) Since this has always been a monster of a show, can you tell us if it was a long movie, trying to include everything from the show? Or was it edited down to make it a more digestible movie? (I don't care either way, just curious.)
Zack The only song that was cut from the musical was Dog Eats Dog. Others were shortened, but for the most part, every song has been included except for Dog Eats Dog.
December 7, 2012 at 8:31PM ESTRick
December 8, 2012 at 12:20AM EST Reply to CommentI cannot figure out why people think Tom Hooper is the great director, and it drives me nuts that he won Best Director for The King's Speech. I thought that film used some of the most film-school level compositions of shots that I have seen in a big critical darling. Shooting Firth in long shots to make him appear small and timid, then transitioning to close ups of Geoffrey Rush to make him appear dominating and in control. I mean, that's stuff the teach you in "Directing For Dummies"
Not to mention I think his cast MADE him. Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, Helena Bonham-Carter, Guy Pearce, and Michael Gambon. These guys couldn't have an off movie is they TRIED. Some of the finest performers today, he had very little to do with it.
Can someone please tell me I'm crazy or at least agree? I've seen a few comments that I think agree with me, particularly Playhouse.
Ali M. I pretty much agree. I think King's Speech deserved Best Picture, but I don't think Hooper deserved Best Director. Les Mis looks like it may be following the same trend.
December 9, 2012 at 5:29PM ESTdaveylo I'm don't think Hooper is a great director but he is a fine director of actors--besides The King's Speech, he's done The Damned United, John Adams, Longford, and Elizabeth I. But if you think The King's Speech deserved a Best Picture award, do you think the film directed itself?
December 9, 2012 at 7:39PM ESTAs far as the actors making The King's Speech work for Hooper, that's just not fair. I've seen a few film in which Firth has been good but the films have been week. I really think you're underestimating what a director does.
Perrie
December 23, 2012 at 2:11PM EST Reply to CommentThe group shots of the scene in the bar and the wedding had lost the tempo. The director cannot handle the farcical scenes.
jason liang
January 15, 2013 at 9:27PM EST Reply to CommentJust watched Les Mis.
I was amazed because the movie reminded me of details and themes from the novel, that I read when I was in 6th grade, that are absent from the musical soundtrack/ television specials, such as that Fantine is fated to never meet her daughter again in life. These details that I had thought I had long forgotten, the movie was able to evoke those memories.
I thought the only flaw with the movie was the editing... there's a lot of evidence that the performances were all there and I hope that a brand new cut will be released next year.
I thought that the movie did a great (but not prefect) job of reinterpreting the material. The Thenardiers are more than just comic relief, and Thenardier's song in the sewer is an important text to a complete reading of Victor Hugo's themes that is missing in this film cut.
I don't think it's fair to judge this movie unless you are also familiar with both the musical and the novel. Should people who have never seen Star Trek care about a Star Trek movie? Should someone who grew up in a rural village in Uzbekistan care about Zero Dark Thirty?
The film cut took out one of my favorite lines: at the end, Valjean explains his confession to Cosette. The line from the musical is: "It's the story of those who always loved you. Your mother gave her life for you then gave you to my keeping." That line kills me. The film changed it to: "It's the story of one who turned from hating. The man who only learned to love when you were in his keeping." I think this change is the most ballsy artistic decision of the movie. A beloved line which is perfect is changed to a line which nails home one of the main themes of Les Mis. If the viewer isn't familiar with the musical, they wouldn't appreciate this.
Les Mis will is still relevant. We are still waiting for tomorrow. Victor Hugo's critique of modernity and capitalism, which was written contemporaneous with the American Civil War (and Lincoln), points to problems that, just like slavery and racism, we still haven't come out of the night into a brighter world.