Review: 'Gangster Squad' features a great cast but a soft script

Ruben Fleischer still hasn't managed to put it all together

HitFix
B-
Readers
n/a
<p>Sean Penn practically leaves tooth marks on the edges of the screen in his turn as Mickey Cohen in 'Gangster&nbsp;Squad'</p>

Sean Penn practically leaves tooth marks on the edges of the screen in his turn as Mickey Cohen in 'Gangster Squad'

Credit: Warner Bros.

Are you a fan of Motion Captured?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

I am fascinated by Los Angeles and its history, and chances are if there's a book or a film about the city, I've read it or watched it.  In particular, the history of law enforcement and its failures here is something that I've been obsessed with for years.  When you list the very best of what's out there, you have to include "Chinatown," a canny piece about the way water and blood were used to build what we think of as modern LA, as well as the books by authors like Walter Mosely and James Ellroy.

"Gangster Squad," liberally adapted from the non-fiction book by Paul Lieberman by real-life-LA-cop-turned-screenwriter Will Beall, is never going to be considered a classic of the genre, but the film has a certain pop cartoon charm that makes it enjoyable, if slight.  Gangster Mickey Cohen has been portrayed on film a few times before.  Harvey Keitel played him in Barry Levinson's "Bugsy" and was rewarded with an Oscar nomination for his work.  And in "LA Confidential," Cohen makes a small appearance with Paul Guilfoyle playing the part.  

In "Gangster Squad," Cohen's been promoted to the main protagonist, and Sean Penn attacks the part with a manic energy that I found wildly entertaining at times.  He looks like a "Dick Tracy" villain, exaggerated and feral, and the film focuses on a period at the end of the '40s when Police Chief Parker (played by a Henson Muppet Studios version of Nick Nolte that is remarkably lifelike) decided to authorize a group of his officers to set aside strictly legal methods to bring down Cohen's operations.  Basically, this is a stripped down and slicked-up version of "The Untouchables," with Josh Brolin starring as Sgt. John O'Mara, the honest cop who is put in charge of putting together his team of trustworthy men to help him.

As with "The Untouchables," the fun of the film comes in two distinct halves.  First, there's the putting together of the team, which includes Sgt. Jerry Wooters (Ryan Gosling), Coleman Harris (Anthony Mackie), Max Kennard (Robert Patrick), Navidad Ramirez (Michael Pena), and Conway Keeler (Giovanni Ribisi), all with their own particular skill set that they contribute to the cause.  Then once they've been brought together, it's all about how they apply the pressure to Cohen.  There's a lot I like about the film, and I think it there's a good chunk of the film where it has a sort of easy-going energy to it.  But there's a big moral question at the heart of the film that they never address, and without fully embracing the notion of cops who decide that they will set aside the letter of the law in order to do something they see as necessary, the film ultimately rings hollow.  That's not me saying that I feel like the film did it "wrong," because it's a choice.  It's just not the choice that I find most compelling.  I would rather see something more grounded in fact, darker in overall tone because that's how I picture the Los Angeles of the late 1940s.  Sure, it was a very pretty time for the city, and my favorite architecture in LA comes from that time, but at heart, post-war Los Angeles was an ugly place, and "Gangster Squad" glosses that in ways that hobble the film's overall effectiveness.

Ruben Fleischer has a knack for creating strong images, but I'm not sure he's figured out how to create a consistent tone.  Even in his strongest film so far, "Zombieland," there are several different tones in play.  Here, he never quite commits to either telling the brutal raw version of the story or the giddy fun version, and the back-and-forth between the two might leave you with a bit of whiplash.  If you walk into the film expecting "LA Confidential," you'll be disappointed, but I'm pretty sure that's not the film they were trying to make.  Instead, they seem to be trying to paint this as the last moment that the mob could have really taken hold in Los Angeles, and a portrait of the people who stopped that from happening.  I haven't ready Lieberman's book, but there's a lot of details here that don't line up with what I've read over the years about Cohen and his time in LA.  As a result, this can't even be judged as a snapshot of a real LA.  From the moment we see the opening images, it's obvious that this is a heightened fantasyland version of the city and the era, and it's at its best when it does't even try to play it as reality.

Robert Patrick seems to get the movie they're trying to make, and he chews on his big moments with relish.  Anthony Mackie has a great introduction but quickly gets sidelined.  Michael Pena, or as I like to call him, The Best Thing About Every Movie He's In, seems to have finally met his match here, and there's really nothing for him to do in the script.  Despite the chemistry that Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling demonstrated in "Crazy Stupid Love," their storyline is probably the biggest misfire in the film.  It might have worked as a standalone movie, but there's a light, nimble, playful quality to their early scenes together, and it is greatly missed as the film wears on.  The script struggles to find a reason to keep her character in the film and active, and then once they finally figure out a way to make her central to the story, it's all handled in a few lines of dialogue about something that takes place off-screen. 

And while I like the idea of the film's ending, the execution doesn't land right.  The real life Mickey Cohen was indeed a boxer who loved to fight, and considering the way Brolin seems to be one of the only guys in his age group who convincingly plays a man instead of a boy, I'm all for watching the two of them go toe-to-toe.  Unfortunately, Dion Beebe's photography is all over the place, something that is starting to become his signature.  I think being a director of photography during this transition period from film to digital has got to be a nightmarish job because the tools to evolve and it seems like the use of old language and new toys sometimes leads to a film that looks great and terrible, often within the same scenes.

Overall, "Gangster Squad" is a light entertainment, the sort of film that goes down painlessly in the theater but that evaporates upon reflection.  It's closer to the "Mulholland Falls" end of the spectrum than the dizzying heights of "Chinatown," but there are mild pleasures to be had if you walk in knowing what to expect.

"Gangster Squad" opens everywhere on Friday.

Drew-mcweeny-sm
Drew McWeeny
Film Editor
A respected critic and commentator for fifteen years, Drew McWeeny helped create the online film community as "Moriarty" at Ain't It Cool News, and now proudly leads two budding Film Nerds in their ongoing movie education.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    neverthehero

    A few thoughts: I"m surprised no mention of the scene that got cut permanently. Is January no longer considered a dumping ground? And a shame I work today because Linux is still doing screenings for this movie. I'll have to let my roommate let me know how it goes.

    January 9, 2013 at 10:21AM EST Reply to Comment
  • A_monty_talkback_profile

    Monty Jack

    Refuse to watch this until the movie theater shootout is restored on Blu-Ray.

    January 9, 2013 at 11:25AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Hammer

    I've read Lieberman's book, read every Ellroy version of Mickey Cohen, and even read actual interviews with Mickey Cohen, and what this movie appears to be doing annoys me to no end.

    The magic of Mickey Cohen is that he was uneducated, a boxer with a losing record who never won a belt, and a man who wasted all his money buying doggie beds and a million pairs of new socks (he never wore the same pair twice as he had manic germaphobia)

    He was a simple gangster that was pretending to be a kingpin, and his allure was that he always made jokes and made light of whenever something bad happened to him. (When his house was bombed, he published photos of his ruined suits)

    So when I see trailers of this supersized maniacal villain, I feel it really dumbs down one of LA's most colorful characters.

    I was really looking forward to this movie, now not so much.


    "Is it not a fact that you live extravagantly, surrounded by violence?" the New Hampshire senator asked Mickey.

    "Whaddya mean 'surrounded by violence,'" Mickey replied, indignant. "People are shooting at me!"

    January 9, 2013 at 11:30AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Ben

    Agree with the earlier comment about the elephant in the room regarding this film, that they had to reshoot a substantial amount of it after the Aurora TDKR screening mass murder because the first trailer included a major shootout in a movie theatre that was a major part of the film's storyline. As a fan of the cast and director Fleischer (hell, I'll go on record as saying I liked "30 Minutes or Less"!), I am curious as to whether there was any sense of something missing or being somehow off in the final cut. Best analogy I can think of is how several films that dealt with terrorism in one way or the other were radically (and understandably) re-edited because they wrapped pre-9/11/01 and were adjusted accordingly, as I saw some of those films and you could tell that SOMETHING was different. Not necessarily bad, even, just a little "what's changed here?".

    January 9, 2013 at 12:04PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Ben Kabak

    That's the nicest trashing of a movie Ive read in a while.

    January 9, 2013 at 1:51PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Sarah

    Born a Gangster's Daughter - My Mother's Story by Maha Al Fahim

    It is fascinating non-fiction book about a gangster family disguised behind the shield of religion.

    www.gangstersdaughter.com

    January 10, 2013 at 1:28AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    CinemaPsycho

    You know what I love about this site? No one here's complaining that Sean Penn's in the movie and refusing to see it because of that fact. I'd like to personally thank you all for that.

    (If anyone is bothered by that, just don't go. Don't complain about it. Just don't go. If you don't like the guy, no one's forcing you to see his movies. Personally, I think he's a great actor. I'd watch Sean Penn read the phone book. I'm just tired of hearing about what a supposed Communist asshole he is whenever his name is mentioned anywhere on the internet.)

    January 10, 2013 at 3:17AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Me_talkback_profile

    Roadshow

    I have seen this movie and I had to come to HitFix to see how bad a review Drew had given it.
    In my opinion, this review goes far too easy on this film.
    I can only describe this film by saying it's like a gangster film would be like if the writers behind Anchorman decided to write a spoof gangster flick but the director had aspirations to make Chinatown while the cinematographer thought they were remaking Dick Tracy.

    The tone is indeed all over the place - one moment it's dialogue about moral grey areas, the next it's our chaps slipping into Cohen's house almost Benny Hill style. Ugh.
    Don't even get me started on our the gang magically dodging bullets from 5 guys with machine guns while they, of course, can pick the baddies off with pin pint accuracy with revolvers.

    I honestly don't know where to begin;
    The dialogue is corny.
    The characterisation non-existant beyond the broadest of strokes.
    The plot is ridiculous.
    The women barely figure.
    And Anthony Mackie, Michael Pena, Robert Patrick, Giovanni Ribisi and Nick Nolte are all wasted too.
    The action is badly staged.
    The only thing of any value is indeed Sean Penn who is the only element who seems to make sense in the whole crazy mess.

    Oh I could go on. Some of the scenes were so awful, I thought they must have been intended to be funny but to say more would risk spoilers and I've gone on too long already.

    It is a mystery to me how a cast of this calibre were attracted to this when the script is so bad. Fleischer must be one hell of a salesman.

    Take my advice; AVOID.
    *

    January 12, 2013 at 7:43PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Yodachilliresize_bigger_talkback_profile

    BigAl6ft6

    I agree with Drew on this flick, it's big and violent and while some may write it off a cheesy, I just like how it swings for the fences. Example: noble shoe shining kid is killed in the crossfire so, naturally, it goes all slow motion as Gossling holds him close as the music swells dramatically. You're either on the trolley or not at that point, I'm on it. also Emma Stone looked friggin mind-bendingly sexy in every frame.

    January 13, 2013 at 11:17PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Around the Web

News From Our Partners