Cannes Film Festival 2013

Is signing Tom Cruise to star in 'Man From UNCLE' an impossible mission?

Guy Ritchie's big-screen version is looking for a lead

<p>Just how many spy franchises does one man need?</p>

Just how many spy franchises does one man need?

Credit: Paramount Pictures

Are you a fan of Motion Captured?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

When I was in Las Vegas a few weeks ago for the "Incredible Burt Wonderstone" press day, part of what we did involved a tour of David Copperfield's private magic museum. In order to get into the museum, you have to go through an outer room that is a reproduction of the men's wear store that his parents owned. Before showing us the secret door that would open the door to the inner warehouse, Copperfield told us that his favorite show as a kid was "The Man From UNCLE," and as soon as he said it, the theme started playing.

To some degree, "The Man From UNCLE" has always been the poor cousin to other spy shows. Norman Felton is the creator of the show, but his work was overshadowed by the publicity around Ian Fleming, who created two characters for the show. Napoleon Solo and April Dancer (who later served as the lead in "The Girl From UNCLE") both came from the back-and-forth between Fleming and Felton, and there was a point where the show was going to be called "Ian Fleming's Solo." The James Bond producers sued to prevent the show from using Fleming's name in the promotions for the show, and his work was just a small part of the overall premise. Producer Sam Rolfe also played a big part in coming up with the details of how UNCLE worked. Once the show went on the air, it was quickly turned into a buddy show, with Robert Vaughn playing Solo and David McCallum as Illya Kuryakin. The series ran for 105 episodes in the mid-to-late '60s, and it was a massive cultural hit.

U.N.C.L.E., which stood for United Network Command for Law and Enforcement, was a sort of catch-all spy agency, and the stories the series told dealt largely with their ongoing battle against THRUSH, a criminal organization that was founded by Col. Basher Moran, the chief henchman to Professor Moriarty, Sherlock Holmes's main adversary. What made UNCLE so different was the way they utilized agents from around the world working together. For a Cold War era series to show an American and a Russian agent teamed as partners was kind of amazing.

It is little wonder that Hollywood has tried to figure out how to turn "The Man From UNCLE" into a feature film for years now. There was a point where Quentin Tarantino wanted to do a version with George Clooney as Napoleon Solo, and Tarantino is a big enough fan that he screened "The Spy With My Face," a feature film version of the show, at one of the QT Fests I attended. In the early '80s, there was a reunion film on CBS, but the attempts sense then have all been designed to reboot the entire thing. Clooney was also attached to play Solo when Steven Soderbergh was recently toying with the idea of making the film, and Scott Z. Burns wrote that version. I have no idea what happened to make Soderbergh cool on the project, but Guy Ritchie, fresh off the "Sherlock Holmes" films, was the studio's first choice to replace him.

Now, according to Deadline, it looks like Tom Cruise may sign on to star in the film, and I'm having trouble understand what it is that Cruise would see in the material that he doesn't already have in his "Mission: Impossible" franchise. True, "UNCLE" was far campier and even absurd at times, but they're still basically stories about spy organizations that can go anywhere and do anything. Maybe it's as simple as Cruise wanting to work with Ritchie, but if that's the case, why not just hire him to make a "Mission: Impossible" film instead of starring in a film that sounds like it will be so close?

At this point, there are so few bona fide movie stars that we're seeing this sort of casting talk, asking people to essentially play the same thing in several different series. It demonstrates a lack of imagination on the part of the studio, but more than that, it's a perfect example of just how fear-driven things are right now. Instead of trying to find a great Napoleon Solo who isn't already a big name, Warner seems to be working from a very short list of viable leads, and it sounds to me like if they do make this version of the film, it's going to be hard for the studio to convince audiences that this is something they haven't already seen.

Cruise will next be seen in "Oblivion," which opens everywhere on April 19.

Drew-mcweeny-sm
Drew McWeeny
Film Editor
A respected critic and commentator for fifteen years, Drew McWeeny helped create the online film community as "Moriarty" at Ain't It Cool News, and now proudly leads two budding Film Nerds in their ongoing movie education.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Jeff Mclachlan

    This is a period piece. I guess that's one thing that makes it different from M:I. And I think Soderbergh had problems with Warners agreeing to a star after Clooney dropped out, and with putting up enough money to actually make the thing. I think they were trying to make it for $60 million, which is obviously a little low for a period-set blockbuster.

    March 18, 2013 at 9:54PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Lori

    Tom Cruise as Napoleon Solo??? NO THANKS!
    Napoleon Solo was sexy, and smart, and funny! Tom Cruise is NOT any of those! This was a campy spoof, and we LOVED both Solo and Ilya Kuraykin. Cruise doesn't have the requisite twinkle in his eye, and the magnetism that is necessary for the role. Find a new somebody; there are thousands of great, young actors who would do a much better job!!! NOT a tired, too used actor with little range and a bad reputation! I'm personally sick of the guy!!!!

    March 18, 2013 at 10:03PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      CinemaPsycho Thanks for the input. Ms. Holmes.

      March 19, 2013 at 1:32AM EST
    • Mehmm_talkback_profile

      Scudman Ha ha, ENOUGH Katie.

      March 19, 2013 at 9:12AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    GuanoLad

    Hugh Jackman should be Napoleon Solo. Ewan McGregor as Illya Kuryakin.

    March 19, 2013 at 1:54AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Mehmm_talkback_profile

      Scudman Great ideas, Jackman certainly deserves a modern, non-superhero franchise. Can we have The Rock in here somewhere too?

      March 19, 2013 at 9:11AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Wozzaseds

    Didn't Clooney drop out because he said his back wasn't up to doing a stunt heavy film after his Syriana accident, at which point, Soderbergh also pulled out?

    March 19, 2013 at 6:22AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Kate You've got the back issues right, but Soderbergh was pretty high on Fassbender to replace him. The studio just wouldn't go there. They wanted someone more established, younger-looking, and American. Soderbergh was willing to settle for Bradley Cooper, and then Channing Tatum, but then budget issues got in the way.

      March 19, 2013 at 11:40AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Paul S

    Tom Cruise is better off doing another MI sequel. The Man from UNCLE was an okay show, but the Austin Powers movies have done the campy secret agent. If QT or Soderbergh do it, then it may be interesting, otherwise it's just more tedium offered by Hollywood.

    March 19, 2013 at 8:18AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Steven Hill

    How exactly does the first paragraph tie into the rest of the story?

    March 19, 2013 at 8:50AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Hogue_talkback_profile

    BdubU

    I loved the recut UNCLE "movies" as a kid. At least one of The Karate Killers, The Helicopter Spies or One of Our Spies Is Missing seemed to be permanent fixtures on the BBC in the 70s early 80s.
    UNCLE was always my team over IMF. Plus, having the villainous organisation named after a yeast infection is a win in my book.

    March 19, 2013 at 8:55AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Freakazoid_talkback_profile

    mmcb105

    I have a hard time believing that you can sell a movie with that title to a wide audience.

    March 19, 2013 at 3:46PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    siratsnah

    I loved the show and for a sort of reboot I think they should go with someone up and coming, like Ryan Gosling.

    March 20, 2013 at 8:56AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Napoleon Slol

    Ron Livingston should play Napoleon Solo

    April 24, 2013 at 8:56PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web