IMAX prologue to 'Star Trek Into Darkness' teases expertly and answers nothing
One thing's for sure: the chemistry is definitely in full force for the sequel
"Look, it's the bad guy for 'Star Trek Into Darkness'! I can't believe it's..." "SHHHH! Not one more word, Uhura!"
Are you a fan of Motion Captured?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Earlier this evening, I took the biggest "Star Trek" fan I know to see the nine-minute prologue that will be screened in IMAX venues in front of the release of "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey," and based on his reaction, I'd say JJ Abrams and crew have absolutely nothing to worry about when the film hits theaters in May of 2013.
Even now, at the end of the nine-minute presentation, I cannot conclusively tell you who Benedict Cumberbatch is playing. We do meet him very early in the footage, though. The film starts with an alarm clock going off, waking a married couple played by Nazneen Contractor and Noel Clarke. They quickly get ready, peeking out their window at the rainy cityscape of London in the year 2259. They drive to the London Children's Hospital to visit their little girl, who appears to be aging prematurely, sick and near-bald, completely unresponsive. Clarke walks outside to catch some air and try to pull himself together, and someone steps up behind him to say, "I can save her." Clarke turns around and we get our first look at Cumberbatch.
Clarke asks, incredulous, "Who are you?" and before we can get the answer to the question, we cut away to a Class M Planet called Nibiru, where we catch up with the crew of the starship Enterprise. We were asked not to provide a complete blow-by-blow of what you'll see, but I can tell you that much of the footage you saw in the announcement video last week was taken from this early part of the film, including Bones and Kirk (Karl Urban and Chris Pine) fleeing through a strange red jungle, chased by a group of aliens because they evidently stole a sacred scroll from them. At the same time, Spock (Zachary Quinto) is onboard a shuttlecraft piloted by Sulu (John Cho), getting ready for his descent into a volcano. While the Prime Directive is definitely a primary concern for the crew, they are determined to stop the volcano from extinguishing an entire race of aliens who are not yet ready for space travel, and Spock's the one who has to actually descend into the active and about-to-erupt main crater.
The stuff with Kirk and McCoy is very funny, and a nice reminder of just how strong the chemistry is with this cast. Same with the stuff between Uhura (Zoe Saldana) and Spock. The moment they bring in the main theme by Michael Giacchino is perfect, lovely and thrilling at the same time. I really love the look of these films, and the alien world is beautifully realized, as is the London of the future. I like that we pick up with the crew in the middle of an adventure and we see how they've come together now with the time that has passed since the end of the first film. Abrams and his screenwriting team, Robert Orci, Alex Kurtzman, and Damon Lindelof, all seem to get the dynamic that makes Kirk, Spock, and McCoy such great archetypes, and it really crystallizes in a moment where Kirk asks McCoy what Spock would do if it were him inside the volcano in peril in a situation where any effort to help is going to violate the Prime Directive. McCoy growls," He'd let you die," and there's no arguing his point.
Obviously the prologue is just a tease, but we'll have more on the film for you this week as we head down to Bad Robot for a full presentation on the movie.
Who knows? We may even finally answer Noel Clarke's question.
In the meantime, my "Star Trek" loving movie buddy tonight, my seven-year-old son Toshi, picked his favorite moment from the nine-minute prologue. It involves Scotty (Simon Pegg) and a fish, so keep your eyes open for that when the prologue hits theaters in front of all IMAX 3D engagements of "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey."
"Star Trek Into Darkness" beams into theaters May 17, 2013.
News From Our Partners
-
'Star Wars: Episode VI': What's Its Legacy... And Its Future?
'Arrested Development' Season Four: Eight Things To Remember
'Fast & Furious 6': The Reviews Are In!
-
Hear This: “Second Best” reflects a pivotal moment all serious bands face
Watch This: The wages and the fear remain high in William Friedkin’s Sorcerer
Cannes Film Festival: Cannes 2013, Day Nine: James Gray and Joaquin Phoenix reteam for a compelling period drama
-
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - Does Someone Have to Go?: Work Sucks.... If You Are On This Show
The Telefile - Save Me: Lightning Strikes NBC
-
'Avengers 2′ — Joss Whedon Talks Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch
Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy HD Will Let You Hold It on Your Mobile Device
Will Smith Raps 'Fresh Prince' Theme with Jaden, Dances "Carlton" and "Apache" with Alfonso Ribiero
-
Baz Luhrmann Passed on Directing 'Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone'
Someone Just Paid $1.5 Million to Sit Next to Leonardo DiCaprio in Space
Tim Curry Is Fine After Suffering a Massive Stroke: Report
-
WATCH: Gay Protest Turns Into Fashion Show
What Netflix Really Wants Out Of 'Arrested Development'
Game Of Desks Is HERE!
-
One Direction's Niall Horan Spends the Night With UK TV Star Louise Thompson
Kelly Clarkson Denies 'American Idol' Judging Gig
Did Justin Bieber Get a Kitten? [Pics]
-
What to Watch This Weekend: Orphan Black, Behind the Candelabra, and Arrested Development's Netflix Debut
Do These Four New Arrested Development Clips Get You Excited for the Show's Return? (VIDEO)
Arrested Development Q&A: Alia Shawkat on Maeby, the Return of the Show, and the Canonization of Mitch Hurwitz
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Latest Posts
-
And if so, what does his character name suggest for the future?Saturday, May 25, 2013
-
How long until they discuss another film in this series?Friday, May 24, 2013
-
They can both use the same character, but will it be worth it?Thursday, May 23, 2013
-
Our conversation was an afternoon delightThursday, May 23, 2013



Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupmridge1
December 10, 2012 at 1:45AM EST Reply to CommentWould it be safe to assume that with the length of 'The Hobbit' and the 'Star Trek Into Darkness' prologue that there will no other trailers attached to IMAX screenings? Like say, 'Man of Steel' and 'Pacific Rim'?
Latauro
December 10, 2012 at 2:04AM EST Reply to CommentBenedict Cumberbatch could be playing one of the hippies from "Spock's Brain" and I'd be cool with it because it's Benedict Cumberbatch.
MarkP *GEEK ALERT*
December 10, 2012 at 12:48PM ESTThere are no Hippies in "Spock's Brain." You're probably thinking of "The Way to Eden."
Latauro Congratulations! You passed my clever test.
December 10, 2012 at 5:09PM EST*hides in cave of shame, brings Star Trek box sets for much-needed refresher*
MarkP I win the internet!!!
December 10, 2012 at 5:49PM ESTGreg
December 10, 2012 at 2:11AM EST Reply to CommentI hope the answer to why the Enterprise is hiding in the Nibiru ocean is the same as the answer to why it was built on land in the last film: It might make no sense but it does make for a cool image.
Does Scotty's little alien buddy make an appearance or is that one of the things you were asked not to give away?
mmcb105 I'm with you, but the assertion that those things don't make sense doesn't really hold any water (pun not intended).
December 10, 2012 at 10:46AM ESTMark "It might make no sense but it does make for a cool image."
December 10, 2012 at 3:31PM ESTThis neatly sums up why I can't engage this new interpretation of Star Trek.
Ryley
December 10, 2012 at 2:31AM EST Reply to CommentI'm sorry, but hide the Enterprise underwater? Why? The aliens don't have space travel, so hide in space, where STARships tend to hang out. I really liked the reboot, and could easily ignore the pieces that tended to be sloppy and piss off life long fans like myself, because I think they mostly nailed the characters. But jesus, the whole Enterprise underwater?
mmcb105 Not to go all geeky on you here, but currently humanity doesn't really have space travel yet (at least not in the way that start trek portrays it), but we could still detect something strange in orbit like an alien spaceship. So maybe the reasoning here is related to that. Maybe there is something volcanic under the surface of the water that only the Enterprise has the tech to handle. Its really not that much of a stretch to think of plausible reasons for this move.
December 10, 2012 at 10:23AM ESTnabguy Wouldn't the descent and submerging of the vessel be MORE noticeable?
December 10, 2012 at 6:59PM ESTAnd oh great, more dorky Scotty related humor.
This description is immensely frustrating, as it seems to be half "inspired" and half "wait, what?" Pretty much my response to the last entry. Where I come from, 50% isn't a good mark.
potty break
December 10, 2012 at 2:37AM EST Reply to CommentAlready have my ticket. Sounds like I should see "The Hobbit" more normally before seeing it in 48 frames.
I have a feeling Giacchino will be doing the next "Planet of the Apes" movie (with J.J. Abrams' lifelong bud Matt Reeves directing) so he'll join Jerry Goldsmith and Leonard Rosenman as composers who have done both franchises.
John G.
December 10, 2012 at 3:00AM EST Reply to CommentDidn't you say that you wouldn't take your sons to see the Hobbit in theaters? I'm confused because I'm genuinely curious about the appropriateness of the Hobbit for children.
John G. Not questioning your parenting in any way, of course! Just curious as I've heard mixed things about this aspect of the Hobbit.
December 10, 2012 at 3:03AM ESTdrew I did say that. That's why I took him tonight to just see the nine-minute "Star Trek" presentation. He won't get to see it in front of "The Hobbit," and "Star Trek" is one of his very favorite things.
December 10, 2012 at 3:47AM ESTbriguyx Drew's review of "The Hobbit" made clear the material was too violent and scary for younger children and that his kids would not be seeing the movie.
December 10, 2012 at 3:49AM ESTJohn G. Ok, I suppose I wrongly assumed that you saw the Star Trek presentation tonight in front of the Hobbit and not separately. Thanks for the clarification.
December 10, 2012 at 4:12AM EST@BRIGUYX - Yes, I obviously remember that, which is why I asked.
A
December 10, 2012 at 3:18AM EST Reply to CommentWhat is it with Scotty and water?!
Shawn
December 10, 2012 at 1:30PM EST Reply to CommentDrew, do we know if this 9-minute preview will be in front of ALL IMAX showings of "The Hobbit" or special IMAX showings, a la The Dark Knight Rises last year?
Dryden I believe this is the full list:
December 10, 2012 at 2:12PM ESThttp://www.imax.com/community/blog/the-extended-preview-of-j-j-abrams-star-trek-into-darkness-will-debut-in-imax-3d-on-december-14th/
alphabet
December 10, 2012 at 6:44PM EST Reply to CommentHas it been considered that Cumberbatch is perhaps playing a new character LIKE Khan (ie. modified human from an abandoned genetics program), but not somebody we've seen before?