An epic interview with the Wachowskis and Tom Tykwer: From 'Cloud Atlas' to 'Jupiter Ascending'
A huge interview with the trio of filmmakers behind the most ambitious film of the fall
Are you a fan of Toronto Film Festival?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
A film as unconventional as "Cloud Atlas" is going to create some controversy, and one of the earliest indicators of that came once the trailer was released. Almost immediately, people began to write about how the film is perpetuating the tradition of "racebending" by casting white actors in Asian roles under make-up. Many of them decided, without seeing any of the actual context for those performances, that this is an obvious case of racism on an institutional level. I disagree completely, and I asked the filmmakers to talk about their choice to use make-up like this. Obviously, when we live in an age where Andy Serkis can star as Caesar in "Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes," we are in a world where any actor can play any part, but the use of prosthetics is different because you're still starting with the base form, the actor, and then building on top of that. There's a moment in the film where Halle Berry, playing a white German Jew in the late '30s, has a nude scene, and I told them I think that is one of the most amazing images in any film this year, something I can honestly say I have never seen before.
Tom laughed. "It was amazing to shoot."

Lana went on to explain, "There's a really interesting subtext to it, too, which I loved. Halle Berry was trying on all the costumes she was going to wear when she played this character, and she's like in 1930's gowns, and Tom's like, 'Oh, aren't period pieces fun? You must be so excited. Don't you love this part of doing a period piece?' He was just sort of innocently asking. And she goes, 'Um, Tom…'"
Lana pointed at her own face, as Halle did to Tom, and Tom continued. "'Think about it, Tom. What would I have been? And why would I be wearing this kind of costume? There is no character.'"
Lana picked up the story, saying, "She would only ever get to be a slave or a servant, and she said it was an interesting thing to her because as an actor, and acting is always about transcending to some degree, she's always been segregated. History remains segregated to actors. They can't… they're not allowed, they're banned, whites only for certain roles. And this movie, which is about transcending convention and transcending boundaries, allowed her just in the physical choice of giving her this part to transcend and claim a part of history through that transcendence that had always been denied to her."

My other favorite film so far this year, "Holy Motors," is about the way performers slip in and out of identities and how they transform themselves, and how it feels like this is a discussion worth having right now as technology allows us to redefine ourselves through online identities and avatars and we are discussing things like outliving our bodies by downloading our personalities, separating soul from form. I talked about how I was looking forward to seeing both films for a second time to see how my reactions to them changed or deepened, and Tom stopped me, realizing I hadn't seen it since I saw the unfinished version in June. "Oh, then you haven't seen the finished film yet. It definitely wasn't mixed when you saw it, which is a huge part of it."
Lana could see how surprised I was and asked, "Can you think of one case where three directors cut every single frame of a film together?"
I told her that I'd never heard of anyone doing that, and Tom agreed that it was unprecedented. "We didn't really ever have a day where it was just two of us. It was always us three and Alex, the editor, who was quite amazing because he had to handle three guys in one room. And they may not face this because it's the two of them, but for me in editing, sometimes you just run a little low, and you're like 'I don't know, I don't know.' On this, we never took a break, because there was always at least one of us who felt like, 'Okay, I know how to do this. I can elaborate on this here.'"
Andy pointed out that Alex did take smoke breaks from time to time, and Tom laughed. "He forced breaks," Andy said.
"He needed that," Tom replied. "He never got a break otherwise. He'd just go for twelve hours a day."
Lana grinned as she said, "It was so joyful and playful. We had such a good time in the editing room. We never wanted to go home. We could have stayed there all day. It was so fun. The shots were… it all started fitting together…"
"That was exhilarating," Tom explained, "because of course we had only seen our rushes, and we had shots that we had designed together, but some of it, we were still discovering as it came together, and we were wrapping our head around how each of us thought it could be constructed. And the most important thing was not sticking to any rule that you had set up before. Everything was on offer. Everything was possible. The two most important words were 'let's try.' You couldn't just be like, 'But this is how it was conceived.'"

Lana said, "We had one big, big moment where we made a very significant shift from the script after we saw our very first cut, and what we were all blown away by was the power of tone. Because no one ever mixes tone. You don't cut a farce in the middle of 'The Matrix.' It just doesn't work. You undo both things. The farce becomes too absurd or too serious, and the philosophical action film just seems idiotic. It's like acids and bases. This thing had lines that were specifically set up to go to another scene, and on the page, it was so perfect. You could look at it and be like, 'Oh, this is going to be so great.'"
I get the feeling Andy is the most wry of the three, because he seemed to love punctuating Lana's explanations of things with voices and asides. He put on an exaggerated voice to interject, "'I am a GENIUS.'"
Tom started laughing. "Because of course we had not cut it yet."
Lana just kept rolling, though. "And then we watched it and we were like, 'Oh my god, it makes the tenderness of this scene seem completely false and shatters it, and the funny thing is just not funny anymore.' And so we had to really go back and very tenderly put tone spacers in between the wide tone shifts."
Looking at the trailer for the film, it would be easy to think that it's all going to be very self-serious, but there's a ton of humor in it. Jim Broadbent, in particular, finds every laugh in the material, and they make great use of that big beautiful rubber face of his. It does require you to keep up, though, as it shifts tone from story to story and scene to scene, and I can see why they worried.

Lana continued, "We thought it was a little audacious when we were writing it. But then when we started cutting it, we were like, 'No, this is crazy.' And there were a couple of days of very tense panic, and then we got in and we started in like, 'Okay, let's do this and this,' and slowly we started to recover it."
Serious now, Andy jumped in. "Even just rhythmically, the final product wasn't the same as the script. After the preamble and the title, it immediately just started going. And we were all exhausted after the first screening because it was just this unrelenting rhythm that was buffeting you and battering you, and so we had to pull back from that a little bit. We had to change the structure a little bit in the beginning, and so that after the preamble, when you're shaking the audience and saying, 'PAY ATTENTION!'
Lana laughed and yelled, "'IT'S DIFFERENT! IT'S DIFFERENT!'"
With a dramatic flourish, Andy added, "'CLOUD ATLAS!'"
Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured
Around the Web
News From Our Partners
-
The Wrap Up: Celebrate Father's Day With These Video Game Dads
Weekend Box Office Report: 'Man of Steel' Soars to Number One
'The Avengers 2′ Won't Feature Loki, So Says Joss Whedon
-
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - Awkward.: Why Season 3 Has Been So Disappointing
The Telefile - Critics' Choice Television Awards 2013: The Winners
-
Andreea Nica: Happy Father's Day: Polygamists
WATCH: Lewis Black Explains What Will Keep Grads Sane
'Curb Your Enthusiasm' Star Arrested
-
FTW vs. WTF: The TV Week in Review (June 15)
What to Watch This Weekend: The Season Premieres of True Blood and Magic City, the Season Finale of Nurse Jackie, and the Series Finale of The Borgias
Continuum "Split Second" Review: Let's Make a Deal
-
'Man Of Steel': Superman And Lois Lane Ditch Old-Timey Romance
'Man Of Steel' Supersuits: Actors Get Deep About Their Spandex
'Man Of Steel' And Lois Lane: The Importance Of Superman's Heroic Woman
-
Box Office: 'Man of Steel' Soars to $113 Million Opening Weekend
Child Learns Hard Way That Robert Downey Jr. Isn't Actually Iron Man
'This Is the End' Cast Reunites for Hilarious 'Real World' Parody
-
Co-Host Psy Opens 2013 MuchMusic Awards With 'Gangnam Style'
2013 MuchMusic Video Awards Red Carpet Pictures
Kanye West Debuts 'American Psycho'-Inspired Short Film [Video]
-
Watch This: Amer offers all the formal pleasures, and none of the clunky narrative filler, of your average giallo
Hear This: Jimmy Eat World would like everyone to forget about “Reason 346”
Crosstalk: How do we build a better television festival?




Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupalynch
October 10, 2012 at 2:14AM EST Reply to CommentGreat article, but I feel compelled to ask about this passage:
"While I had to leave France disappointed, my efforts were not unnoticed, and in June, I was asked to come see "Cloud Atlas," which was pretty much locked as a cut, although not mixed at that point."
So does that mean you had already seen the film when you wrote this article from a few months back when the long trailer first dropped?
http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captured/cloud-atlas-unleashes-a-six-minute-long-trailer-with-plenty-of-tom-hanks-and-halle-berry
I ask only because it seems to be written from the perspective of someone who hasn't seen it. Was it some sort of extreme embargo situation where you were forbidden from even mentioning the screening?
drew That's exactly what it was. I had to completely and utterly play it as if I had not seen the film. It made it very hard to frame my enthusiasm without giving everything away.
October 10, 2012 at 2:18AM ESTMatt
October 10, 2012 at 2:45AM EST Reply to CommentThis was detailed, smart, heartful and sweet. Your passion for them, their work, and film is apparent with each sentence. I really enjoyed this. Well done sir.
MarkB
October 10, 2012 at 2:50AM EST Reply to CommentDrew, this is probably my favorite piece that I have read here. You captured something that you rarely see in big-budget filmmakers: passion. Can you imagine Ridley Scott talking excitedly about how he's attempting to break the traditional boundaries of cinema with Prometheus? I can't, and I love Ridley Scott. Cloud Atlas is now the movie I most want to see this fall.
Please do more in-depth pieces like this, and try heeding Lana's admonition. Too much focus is put on the business of movies -- look how John Carter "failed" before it even opened -- and not enough on the art. Keep reminding me why I fell in love with film in the first place.
Thanks for putting a wonderful cap on an otherwise crappy day. Please keep doing what you do so well.
- Mark
kadoogan
October 10, 2012 at 4:01AM EST Reply to CommentBusiness & Art.
I think it's okay to write about both -- in fact I think it's necessary since the business side dictates what happens with the art side...but just make sure your coverage of one outweighs the other. Which is something I think you do. So, good on you and please accept my "Atta boy" for this article.
himesheth
October 10, 2012 at 5:37AM EST Reply to CommentFantastic article Drew, now I'm even MORE excited by the film. Unfortunately it only comes out here (the UK) next year :(
Stacy
October 10, 2012 at 9:41AM EST Reply to CommentAwesome interview. I always respected the fact that the Wachowskis tell their story how they wanna tell it and how they are always up to take risks with big canvas studio filmmaking. Can't wait to see Cloud Atlas.
Edward Douglas
October 10, 2012 at 9:58AM EST Reply to CommentGoing to take me some time to read this but I'm surprised you didn't do it as a QnA
yourblindspot
October 10, 2012 at 10:21AM EST Reply to CommentAmazing conversation, Drew, and as frank and earnest as any interview I've read in a very long time. Thanks so much for sharing it with us. As a fan of both the team and the source, I am thrilled to see what they've done with it and fully expect to be floored.
DocLazy
October 10, 2012 at 10:28AM EST Reply to CommentEpic! Thank you, Drew. This has been one of the best interviews, I've ever read. I am from Germany and am both a Fan of Tom and the Ws for a f*cking long time now. I never understood all the hate against Speed Racer. I love it and I'm 46, damn it! We need more creative people like this trio infernale out there in this business. This is filmmaking, how it should be. Always.
I'm really looking forward to Cloud Atlas, my friend. Hopefully this will get some rewards. And if not in cash, than at least in award season. They deserve it. And Tom, too. I am more than a little proud as a German.
Again thank you so much. Keep up the good work and your Film Nerd 2.0 reviews. I enjoy them all.
mmcb105
October 10, 2012 at 11:19AM EST Reply to CommentEpic indeed. The depth of the interview is astounding without even considering how reclusive and press shy the Wachowski siblings are normally. Thanks for the great interview, Drew.
David
October 10, 2012 at 11:48AM EST Reply to CommentAwesome piece. I am so excited to see CA.
ungruntled
October 10, 2012 at 12:44PM EST Reply to CommentBravo. I wish every filmmaker interview could be like this.
jeves23
October 10, 2012 at 1:10PM EST Reply to CommentFantastic piece, Drew. I agree with Lana - keep fighting the good fight. Yours is one of the freshest, boldest, and most poignant voices in online film criticism and discussion today.
I am looking forward to this film with probably more zeal than any film in recent memory, and it is the willingness to reach high, to drive the art form of cinema forward, and to challenge viewers on emotional, aesthetic and perhaps even spiritual levels that makes the Wachowski's one of the great mainstream* voices of today.
I am so glad that they, and Tom Tykwer, are doing press for this film, and that we finally get to hear their passion and their joy for their work - even though I am largely a big believer in the work speaking for itself, it is refreshing to read/watch these interviews, and get a real answer/discussion rather than the typical Hollywood sound bite.
*Well, perhaps not quite mainstream anymore, but not exactly obscure art house directors, either.
Paul S
October 10, 2012 at 1:26PM EST Reply to CommentGood write up Drew.
I hope it lives up to the hype that's starting to build up for it. Like James Cameron and Robert Zemeckis, The Wachowski Starship seem to be the film industry's technology pioneers and will use them to tell us a good story.
Like most people, the first time I saw The Matrix, I was blown away by "bullet time", so I was very interested when they spoke of the evolutionary aspect of this effect that they will use for Jupiter Ascending.
adfsds
October 10, 2012 at 1:44PM EST Reply to Commentjust fantastic
alphabet
October 10, 2012 at 3:05PM EST Reply to CommentDrew this was amazing. Strong work sir, keep fighting that good fight indeed.
Fawst
October 10, 2012 at 3:06PM EST Reply to CommentWhat a great piece, Drew. I remember watching the featurettes on The Matrix back in the day, and the passion the Wachowskis had was infectious. I'm really looking forward to Cloud Atlas, but you just teased the hell out of me with that comment on the "evolutionary jump from bullet-time." Now I'm going to be disappointed if it doesn't happen!
blue_flames LOL yep, consider my interest piqued too :)
October 10, 2012 at 3:48PM ESTMore "epic" interviews please, I don't care who they're with!
Bananaman
October 10, 2012 at 5:32PM EST Reply to CommentExcellent article Drew. I love the Wachowski's attitude to film-making.
Mark
October 10, 2012 at 5:57PM EST Reply to CommentWhat a spectacular piece, Drew. You have an inherent understanding of how to communicate experiences. This article wonderfully illustrates the publicity and interview process, not only from your perspective, but also from the Wachowskis, or at least the way they carried themselves. I think the mystique has fallen away. I can't speak for other movie fans, but I'm happy to add a love affair for the creators to my already entrenched love affair for their work.
TimB
October 10, 2012 at 7:24PM EST Reply to CommentWonderful, wonderful piece. I was a huge fan of "Speed Racer," and though I found the "Matrix" sequels to be disappointing, there has always been a clear theme of "ambition" running through all of their work... and hat no doubt looks to continue with "Cloud Atlas," which I am absolutely dying to see.
Thanks for this, Drew. The passion that comes through in your writing is unmatched by any other "film analyst/critic" on the net, in my opinion.
Billy Shears
October 11, 2012 at 12:23AM EST Reply to CommentGood in-depth write-up Drew. I was among the lucky crowd in the Princess of Wales Theatre at the film's world Premiere in Toronto last month. Seeing the long-form trailer this summer compelled me to catch this epic movie at the earliest opportunity. I had no idea the film's cast & crew would be there; it was a pleasant surprise for me, as the 10-minute ovation was for them. I'm looking fwd to seeing again when it's released on the 26th. I do think this is the W's "2001" and will be seen as a classic, innovative landmark film in future years if not right away. I don't know how they can follow this act... but they're incredibly creative, so who knows.
Seal's_Wet
October 11, 2012 at 10:43AM EST Reply to CommentDrew, big fan of your writing and the site. Just one question how come you didn't ask them why they completely ripped off Grant Morrison's
"The Invisibles" for the first Matrix movie?
MMorse Because that would've been inexcusably rude?
October 11, 2012 at 4:56PM ESTSEAL'S_WET Of course a certain amount of tact would have to be used and I wouldn't advocate a “shock jock” approach or a blind siding but I call foul on these artists (who are obviously talented individuals which makes it even more egregious) using the mystique of inaccessibility shield themselves from what basically boils down to plagiarism. It is certainly not my intention to troll this thread (hell I’ll be seeing Cloud Atlas opening weekend not sure if that makes me a hypocrite) but I think there’s an interesting conversation to be had regarding what happens when artists (especially talented artists you like) conduct themselves questionably. This isn’t an example of a company ripping off an artist ala Marvel screwing Kirby, that narrative is unfortunately not that surprising, but artists of this caliber thieving or at the very least going out of their way to ignore a clear inspiration (that was also an active part of the production process they passed around issues of the comic on set!) is disheartening. I’m genuinely interested in hearing other opinions from posters and I apologize if my initial post came off as troll-ish but I do think this stuff matters and I find it disconcerting when others don’t see the act of one artist outright taking of ideas and aesthetics of another without any acknowledgement or compensation to be a problem. At the end of the day you expect this type of behavior from the stereotypical cut-throat executive but I would like to think that artists like the “Wachowski Starship” (admittedly hilarious / awesome nickname) are above this type of behavior. Am I missing something?
October 12, 2012 at 9:30AM ESTDunyain Sound's like "Seal's_Wet" has a case of troll's remorse. The Matrix was certainly inspired by Invisibles, (among other things) but calling it a "complete ripoff" is childish and fanboyish. When will someone ask Morrison why he ripped off Michael Moorcock's "Jerry Cornelius" books when he made Invisibles.
November 23, 2012 at 5:56PM ESTBradley Valentine
October 12, 2012 at 8:42AM EST Reply to CommentAmazing, Drew, really. I never say this kind of thing because seems so ass-kissy. But thank you. The former brothers are some of my very favorite filmmakers and, as everybody knows, access is rare. So it’s great to have this. Good job, man.
chainlinkspiral
October 12, 2012 at 5:23PM EST Reply to CommentKiller read, as always. Thanks to all involved for making some magic.
PierreFutsch
October 13, 2012 at 4:23AM EST Reply to CommentGood morning,
i just read your article. From page 1 to 9 straight (with a quick jump to go read the newyorker article) and it gave me chills and emotions. That is a very rare feeling while reading interviews and review. Thanks for this. Also thanks for making me meet the"Wachowski Starship", i thought i knew who they were but i was wrong, i met them today and i would gladly be the red shirt of their crew after reading your article. Thanks you sir, and thanks the Wachowski Starship for us, for being so open and real, thanks. A thousand thanks.