Cannes Film Festival 2013

A day at Bad Robot gives us a better look at 'Star Trek Into Darkness'

Plus we share a crazy theory about the secrets JJ Abrams is hiding in plain sight

<p>'Would you believe we built that room for a Hulk?'</p>

'Would you believe we built that room for a Hulk?'

Credit: Paramount Pictures

Are you a fan of Motion Captured?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

Finally, I'd like to advance a theory.

I may be taking one of the most obvious bits of bait of all time.  Because I'll explain exactly how I ended up forming this "completely silly out of left field but what if" theory.  If you don't want anything spoiled about the film, you can most probably read the following because I think it's unlikely I am right.  In fact, today's press event was probably carefully calibrated to help generate some misinformation.

There is a character who exists on the fringes of "Star Trek" canon, and that's why I think it's a crazy theory. Would Abrams and Orci and Kurtzman and Lindelof really take advantage of their big cosmic reset button and tell the story of the character originally named Captain Robert April in the first pilot script for the original series?  When "Star Trek" finally did go to pilot, they changed April's name to… Christopher Pike.

In his episode of the animated show, which you can see on NetFlix Instant right now, he's a Commodore, a former captain of the Enterprise, taking a trip with his wife on the ship, and when a mysterious illness hits the crew and starts aging them in reverse, Commodore April and his wife, who are much older than anyone else, and as a result, they were the ones to save the day because they had more time than anyone else to solve the problem.  His wife was a Starfleet medical officer when he was the captain, too, so they were both tied to the Enterprise.

Meanwhile, in the books, April is revealed to be someone who came from Coventry in England.  You know England, right?  That's where London is.  You remember why that matters right?  Because of the one-sheet looking out on the London skyline.

And the opening of the film, which you'll see at the IMAX presentation, features a moment where Cumberbatch offers to help a family whose daughter is hospitalized in the London Children's Hospital. So it seems like England is important to this April character.  Hmmmm.  And why does the daughter need help?  Because she appears to be prematurely aging.  The guy who figured out how to reset the body clock to move in a different direction might be a perfect person to help that little girl… wouldn't you think?

Want More...

Star Trek?
  • Startrek1_thumbnail
    Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.
What if you learned that in the books that April's executive officer was a dude named Commander George Kirk?  You know… the one that Chris Hemsworth so memorably played at the start of 2009's "Star Trek"?  On the other hand, in other books, Pike is April's second-in-command.

So what if something happened to April on a mission somewhere with Pike.  It didn't have to be on the Enterprise as long as the two of them were serving together.  And what if something terrible happened to April because of Pike and Pike came home and went on with his life?  What if April is the one who comes to Earth, not for revenge on Kirk, but for revenge on Pike?

After all, that shot at the end of the trailer that hits online and in theaters on December 17th has Cumberbatch asking, "Is there anything you would not do for your family?" while we see that oh-so-tricky shot of the two hands on opposite sides of the glass.  That's totally designed and cut to make you think they're going to try to reproduce the ending of "Wrath of Khan."

But what if it's not Kirk on the other side of the glass from Spock?

What if it's Pike?  What if he's playing for his "sins" and saving everyone else on the Enterprise at the same time?

Like I said… that's one crazy theory.  I'll bet I'm connecting dots that just don't connect.

But… one last thing.  In the trailer, you've seen the shot where Cumberbatch jumps, lands, and then swats a dude using a huge long hunk of metal.  Well, that hunk of metal is what the crew on the film called "The Big Gun."  That's what we were told during our tour, and as everyone was discussing it, we were standing in a room that had been specially set up for today's event.

And on the counter at the back of the room, there was a big book of production art that was open.  Laying right there were anyone could see it.  And on one of the two pages, there was a concept design sketch for that gun.

But instead of "The Big Gun," it was called "April's Gatling Gun."

As in the gun that April uses.  The gun that seems to belong to Cumberbatch in the trailer, which would suggest that Cumberbatch is April.

You see what I mean about misdirection?  What if they intentionally left that there, open to that page, in the exact area where everyone was standing, just to help obfuscate everything even more?

Or… even crazier… what if they really didn't think anyone would pay attention to that, and that's really what they're doing for this film?

Whatever the case, it's fun to play along as we count down to the release of both the trailer and the prologue in a few weeks, and I hope this sneak peek behind the scenes got you as interested as I am at this point.

"Star Trek Into Darkness" opens May 17, 2012.

Prev 1 2 3 Next
Drew-mcweeny-sm
Drew McWeeny
Film Editor
A respected critic and commentator for fifteen years, Drew McWeeny helped create the online film community as "Moriarty" at Ain't It Cool News, and now proudly leads two budding Film Nerds in their ongoing movie education.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • 1
  • 2
Next 47 Comments
  • Shaggy_werewolf_talkback_profile

    That Werewolf Guy

    That is actually a seriously interesting theory.

    December 11, 2012 at 8:32AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Charles Purvis

    Write a comment...Drew--that right there is some excellent speculation. Love the overall notion of Abrams and crew mining some of the pre-TOS material, rather than hurtling forward into re-hashing/subverting known continuity.

    Who knows if you're right, but I really like the mental territory it sugggests.

    December 11, 2012 at 8:34AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    whiterok

    Your theory makes a whole lot more sense than the Khan speculation. I think they will definitely pay homage to Wrath of Khan but I don't see any real evidence that he will be in the movie. I have a feeling you were the first to crack the story.

    December 11, 2012 at 8:39AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jeff

    I think it's great that Abrams and company mess with the audience like this. In this day and age of scoops and Internet talkbacks, the better able filmmakers are to keep secrets and preserve the fun of discovery on opening day, the better it is for the fan.

    December 11, 2012 at 9:10AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Brendan

    The difference between Khan and the Joker is that the Joker has existed for 100 years across hundreds of different iterations and interpretations, so there was plenty of room. Khan is not a particularly distinctive or interesting villain, it was how he was used for the sequel, and what his villainy evoked from the heroes that made him interesting. Digging him up to re-use seems like laziness of the highest degree.

    I don't think he's Khan, for one big reason: Pegg. Simon Pegg. He said in an interview a couple months back that the villain was ABSOLUTELY NOT Khan and expressed annoyance that people were just making things up to try and get page views. Abrams and them love to play these games, but I don't think Pegg would straight-up lie to Star Trek fans. At least, I hope he wouldn't.

    December 11, 2012 at 9:17AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Mike The Joker has existed for 100 years?
      Since when is it 2040?

      December 11, 2012 at 2:52PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    A

    I hate your theory because it just might be true. Rawr.

    December 11, 2012 at 9:26AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    A

    It even ties with his alias John Harrison. Who is a Brit and a clockmaker. Time... time... Jesus! Did I just spoil myself bigtime?!

    December 11, 2012 at 9:40AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Lola

    One of the best, most insightful commentaries I've read on this film so far. And am completely in agreement with you on the need to excite our next generation in space and exploration. Thank you!

    December 11, 2012 at 10:35AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    A

    Opens 17 May 2013, not 2012, obviously

    December 11, 2012 at 10:43AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Phlogo_talkback_profile

    Playhouse

    It would be exceptionally interesting if they used Capt. April in some fashion. Whether or not Cumberbatch is April, it seems like something they all would do.

    December 11, 2012 at 11:07AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Spockenroller

    My gosh, I love you DRew McWeeny!

    December 11, 2012 at 11:22AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Bethesdacamel

    One thing that has crossed my mind is that Cumberbatch isn't even the main antagonist. Peter Weller said that his role is "substantial" and that his character has a ship - plus he said that he isn't in alien makeup. Wonder why we haven't heard anything about him yet...

    December 11, 2012 at 11:30AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Mark This would be truly exciting. If all of this obfuscation and misdirection about Cumberbatch was actually in service of hiding who the true villain in the movie is, someone we haven't seen yet, then I will be impressed.

      December 11, 2012 at 1:01PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Les I really hope that's not true. There are two main reasons I'm excited about this movie. One, I loved the last one and two, Benedict Cumberbatch is in it. I think he's a terrific actor. It would be a shame if he's relegated to a background role.

      December 12, 2012 at 9:08PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    JMT

    Or what if someone wrote an article that droned on and on for three pages and made me completely forget why I enjoy Abrams' take on "Trek?" Wait — somebody did.

    December 11, 2012 at 11:57AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Old_bill_closeup_talkback_profile

    DKT

    Excellent article, Drew. While I agree with what you're saying about Khan - that they could do a Khan story with Cumberbatch making it his own, and it could be good without being a retread - I still hope they've decided to go their own way, and try something different.

    I LOVE your theory about April. Never heard of him before - just like I'd never heard of Harrison - but I love the idea of Abrams and the writers mining something older in Trek community. And I think if Cumberbatch just turned out to be Khan, it'd make it much harder to pull off a trick like that. Whatever they decide, I'll check it out.

    (I also find myself agreeing with a lot of people pointing out that it's telling we don't know who Weller is playing - I suppose he could be April, or Khan, pulling strings, and I'm okay with that too.)

    December 11, 2012 at 12:02PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Gamera1_talkback_profile

    KlarkKent

    I'd love to see that actually be what happens in the film. Talk about a way to bring back obscure original Trek lore. Was Harrison the stereotypical Irish character? It's been a while since I've seen the original series. If I can ever afford the blu rays, I'll probably start watching them again.

    December 11, 2012 at 12:09PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      just_khan no he looked more latin or has a tan complexion. he was more obscure then mr. leslie.

      December 14, 2012 at 5:56AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    batphantom

    Interesting. Devin suggested that it was Cumberbatch behind the glass, holding his hand to Spock, which made me think he's actually Sybok, though rather than Sarek's son, he's Amanda's, from before she met Sarek. And he's out for revenge on Starfleet for what happened to her. Which would be a little cyclical, given that Nero was out for revenge for what happened to Romulus, but hey, isn't that the nature of vengeance? Still, your detail about April's Gatling Gun sounds pretty specific, so yeah, your theory sounds much more plausible.

    December 11, 2012 at 12:27PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Guy Smiley I can't imagine why NuTrek would want to reference anything related to ST V.

      December 11, 2012 at 1:42PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      just_khan i think it's Pike when he has the accident that put him that wheelchair with the flashing yes and no panel and not the wheelchair we saw at the end of 09 trek.

      December 14, 2012 at 5:58AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Mark

    I'm not sure it's true but this is an interesting hypothesis and no more far fetched... actually much less far fetched than the idea that Cumberbatch is playing Khan. In fact, at this point (and I must stress that I LOVE Abrams' first Star Trek), I will be crushed if the character turns out to be Khan. It's so difficult to wrap my head around the change in continuity for the character to suddenly be a thin British guy rather than a robust Indian superman that it will affect my ability to enjoy the film. I'm not typically that kind of fan. I genuinely WANT to like Star Trek.

    December 11, 2012 at 12:59PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    BeyondtheTech

    CORRECTION: Star Trek Into Darkness opens May 17, 2013. Oh, I wish it opened in 2012.

    December 11, 2012 at 1:07PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Guy Smiley

    "I'd also argue that there is only one villain that means anything to the general public as far as "Star Trek" is concerned, and that's Khan."

    Sadly, that's true. If there were any justice, the name "Gul Dukat" from DS9 would mean more to more people too.

    Drew, as your boy continues to grow, dream, and, um, prosper, I hope the two of you will watch DS9 together too. Great show that took chances the other modern Treks didn't, and was often all the richer for it.

    December 11, 2012 at 1:40PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Phlogo_talkback_profile

      Playhouse Yep. Definitely the best of the Trek series. Roddenberry never wanted to get into protracted war with his property, but DS9 had amazing things to say on the human condition when it gave over to the Dominion conflict.

      December 11, 2012 at 4:34PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Bad Seed

    Drew, I love this theory, especially since it counters the majority opinion that most commentators hold: that Khan's involved somehow. however, people like Devin Faraci are adamant that the latter's true, so this makes me wonder if maybe you're both right. Maybe Benedict is Khan or one of his followers--but maybe April is in here too.

    So here's my idea: maybe Peter Weller is playing April. After all, we know next to nothing about his character, so maybe he partners with one of Khan's supermen to get revenge on Pike. Maybe he even believes that the supermen hold the key to aging, I don't know. Anyway, it would certainly be an interesting blend of canon characters, don't you think?

    December 11, 2012 at 1:51PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    John Bigbooté

    Sadly Drew's theory falls apart in light of the fact that we all know Benicio del Toro was originally offered Cumberbatch's role (which also undermines the Gary Mitchell theory).

    December 11, 2012 at 1:56PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Mark So the fact that they were trying to cast a Latin actor means the role is obviously Khan? Cumberbatch is certainly not Latin, so why did they suddenly decide to change Khan's physical type? Is it at all possible that the stories about the Latin casting are misinformation?

      December 11, 2012 at 2:44PM EST
    • Old_bill_closeup_talkback_profile

      DKT How does that undermine his theory? Del Toro could've been playing April.

      December 11, 2012 at 2:45PM EST
    • Phlogo_talkback_profile

      Playhouse Weren't they still working on solidifying the story when Del Toro was cast and then dropped out? How do we know they didn't alter what they were doing when he left the project?

      December 11, 2012 at 4:36PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Paul

    I echo what a couple of people have said on here. I think Peter Weller's character must be the thing that will let us know what's really going on or else JJ and Co. would not continue to keep him hidden completely from all these presentations so far.

    December 11, 2012 at 2:07PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    brigux

    Good thing Spock is going out with Uhura now that he has nowhere to go once pon farr comes around...

    December 11, 2012 at 6:08PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Fred Bronson

    Drew, as the writer of "The Counter-Clock Incident" that introduced Robert April, you've got me very excited. Would you like to hear about the conversation I had with J.J. about April during the filming of his first Star Trek?

    December 11, 2012 at 6:26PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      NoHoGreg I don't know about Drew, but I would be sure to interested to hear about it.

      December 11, 2012 at 7:41PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Guy Smiley Mr. Bronson, please... Do tell!

      December 11, 2012 at 7:46PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    ageing

    A great theory. It follows that Weller then is also April.

    December 11, 2012 at 7:40PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      ageing To spin this theory even further: Spock dies. Spock prime becomes new young Spock.

      December 11, 2012 at 8:18PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Dark

    Interesting article written YEARS ago: Shatner to Play Captain April in Upcoming Movie ...off base...but someone was thinking of Captain April:

    http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/misc/trekxi_shatner.htm

    December 11, 2012 at 11:44PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    filmboy

    Interesting theory Drew. But what if it is Peter Weller playing April and not Cumberbatch.

    Weller is appropriate age to have been Pike's commanding officer. They could certainly fold April into a reworked version of Space Seed, having him either mentor or work with Cumby's Khan.

    I don't know, just an idea. I will say that I am 99% sure this film ends with Carol Marcus pregnant with Kirk's child. It may seem like a tired route to go, but I think in this universe it is just much more interesting. This Kirk lost his own father on the day of his birth. It would be interesting to me to see what choice he would make if faced with being a father himself. Would he choose to remain in Starfleet and choose his crew or would he realize he does not want his child to be fatherless and would chose Carol and his unborn child?

    This choice plays into one of the emerging themes of this film, which is family and what we would be willing to sacrifice for our family. Kirk giving up starfleet for his unborn child is a pretty big sacrifice. Will it happen? Who knows. But it would be interesting none the less.

    December 12, 2012 at 11:27AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    D

    I have another theory about the hospital scene. One of the TOS characters who could help with premature aging would be Dr. roger Korby...

    OTOH, apparently someone who worked on ADR reported that the name Robert April *is* used several times in the movie...

    December 13, 2012 at 12:05AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Tony Torchia

    You are the man, great theory! But I am losing my favorite Trek trivia question, now everyone knows about April. Still, I wouldn't have it any other way.

    December 13, 2012 at 7:48PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    just_khan

    my theory is that the peter weller character knows or finds out about the botany bay and since he is known to have a ship he goes to look for it and maybe with the help of some klingons. he has crewman harrison killed and has khan surgically altered to look like harrison which would explain the starfleet uniform. i don't know the extent of what role weller will play so there might be gaps that i can't piece together that well. that gun he swings to knock down a klingon could be a klingon lab and he escapes. i also think the other person on the other side of the glass wall is Pike when he has that accident that put him that wheelchair with the flashing lights and not the one in trek 09 where he was recovering. also i've learned that whatever is in a trailer might not always make the movie. i hope they get two steps from hell to create the music for the trailer. they are awesome.

    December 14, 2012 at 6:14AM EST Reply to Comment
  • 1
  • 2
Next 47 Comments

Get Instant Alerts on Motion/Captured

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web