<p>Mel Gibson may have made the &quot;Mad Max&quot;&nbsp;role famous, but Thomas Hardy is stepping up as the star of not one but two new sequels from director George Miller.</p>

Mel Gibson may have made the "Mad Max" role famous, but Thomas Hardy is stepping up as the star of not one but two new sequels from director George Miller.

Credit: Warner Bros.

Confirmed: We're getting two 'Mad Max' movies instead of one

What is George Miller up to right now?

As recently as March 2009, George Miller seemed resigned to the idea that he was never going to get the chance to make a "Mad Max" sequel in live-action, and he seemed like he was moving on to the notion of making an anime-inspired CGI "Mad Max" movie.  I understand his frustration, since I've been feeling it as a fan for years now.  I still ache to get my hands on the original pre 9/11 script for "Fury Road," which supposedly wasn't even in conventional screenplay format, but was instead a bound set of storyboards, a visual roadmap for the proposed film.

So it's hard for me to believe that right now, somewhere in the world, George Miller is standing on a set making a "Mad Max" film in live-action.  It is truly a wonderful world we live in.

And now, making it even more wonderful, Todd Brown of Twitch broke the rumor this morning that Miller is not making one film, but actually two back-to-back for a giant "Mad Max" epic.  There's been a fair amount of discussion back and forth online all day about whether this rumor will pan out or not, but HitFix can now confirm that, according to sources, Miller is indeed making two films at the same time.

Certainly makes sense of the statment Thomas Hardy made at the "Inception" junket when he mentioned that he was going to be shooting for an entire year.  That's a huge commitment for a cast to make, and I know when I spoke to Teresa Palmer at the press day for "The Sorcerer's Apprentice," she was genuinely distraught that her schedule on "I Am Number Four" had forced her to drop out of the film.  As an Australian, she grew up on the films, and she's known Miller for a while, having almost starred in his "Justice League" film at one point.

Read Full Post
<p>Matthew Vaughn directs Aaron Johnson and Chloe Moretz on the set of 'Kick-Ass,' which arrives on DVD&nbsp;and Blu-ray on August 3.</p>

Matthew Vaughn directs Aaron Johnson and Chloe Moretz on the set of 'Kick-Ass,' which arrives on DVD and Blu-ray on August 3.

Credit: Lionsgate/MARV

Watch: Exclusive new behind-the-scenes clip from 'Kick-Ass' Blu-ray

See how they prepared Kick-Ass to get his ass kicked

Wow... it seems like it took years and years from the first time I read the script for "Kick-Ass" to the moment it landed in theaters, and yet it seems like it's been about eleven minutes since it opened, and now we're already gearing up for DVD and Blu-ray, since the film is released on home video on August 3rd.

One of the things I'm most interested in seeing when the Blu-ray is released is a documentary that won't be appearing on the standard DVD edition, called "A New Kind Of Superhero: The Making Of Kick-Ass."  We've got an exclusive clip for you today from that documentary, dealing with the way they approached the idea of fight choreography for Aaron Johnson's character.  This is just a taste, though, so if you like what you see, you'll end up having to check out the whole thing on the final release of the disc.

If Blu-ray is ever going to catch up to DVD in terms of overall market share, then they need to create content that is both exclusive to the format and that offers real value.  I see some ridiculous "special features" sometimes that I can't imagine anyone ever using, but this is something that would tip me towards buying the Blu-ray rather than the DVD if I was debating the choice.

I love the way Lionsgate Blu-rays look for the most part, and I think with "Kick-Ass," they've got a movie that should really push the visual quality as hard as possible.  Matthew Vaughn shot in such bright primary colors, and the film's got such an aggressive action style, so I'm hoping the Blu-ray lives up to that .

Read Full Post
<p>Chloe Moretz and Kodi Smit-McPhee star in &quot;Let Me In,&quot;&nbsp;the new American version of the Swedish vampire film.</p>

Chloe Moretz and Kodi Smit-McPhee star in "Let Me In," the new American version of the Swedish vampire film.

Credit: Overture Films

Watch: 'Let Me In' offers up a first chilly look at Chloe Moretz in the lead

As fans get their first look at the American version, many fears are calmed

Earlier this week, there was a screening for "Let Me In" at a mysterious, undisclosed location in Southern California.  I did not attend, but several people I know did, and the word back from all of them was the same.

They loved it.

Color me pleasantly shocked here.  Even when I spoke to Matt Reeves about the film at SXSW this year, I wasn't sure what to expect.  I was one of the people who spent a lot of time and energy talking about "Let The Right One In" when I saw it at Fantastic Fest '08, and I love the way the film has built in reputation over time.  I figured that it was going to have a long fuse on it, and sure enough, it seems like one of those movies that home video is slowly but surely growing from an obscure foreign title to a genuine genre classic.

Even though I think it's sort of ridiculous to make a new version of the book this close to the release of the Swedish film, that seems to be the new business model.  And if they've got to do it, at least Matt Reeves seems to have a real affinity for the material.  In our conversation, it was obvious that he's as big a fan of the novel as the Swedish film, so he's drawing from both in making his version.  And until this trailer came out, how closely he might be taking cues from the film was still a question mark.

Read Full Post
<p>Andrew Garfield, seen here in 'Boy A,' has been cast as Peter Parker in the new 'Spider-Man' due in theaters in 2012.</p>

Andrew Garfield, seen here in 'Boy A,' has been cast as Peter Parker in the new 'Spider-Man' due in theaters in 2012.

Credit: The Weinstein Company

Breaking: Sony Pictures announces Andrew Garfield for 'Spider-Man'

Who is Garfield, and does this mean Spider-Man loves lasagna?

Andrew Garfield, the young English actor who appeared in "The Imaginarium Of Dr. Parnassus," the "Red Riding" trilogy, and the upcoming Mark Romanek film "Never Let Me Go," has been cast as Peter Parker for the upcoming "Spider-Man" reboot, according to a press release by Sony Pictures.

"Boy A" was actually where I saw him the first time, and right away, he seemed like a young actor worth paying attention to, someone with a very raw and honest approach.  His work in the "Red Riding" trilogy is mature and difficult, and he was absolutely up to the task.  And working with Terry Gilliam on the troubled "Parnassus" was a great move.  Even though all the press on that film was about Heath Ledger's untimely demise, onscreen, it was Garfield who served as the emotional core of the movie, and he was great in it.

He's older than I would have expected based on the casting speculation surrounding this film.  Most of the final candidates are genuine teenagers, while Garfield is 27 right now.  Originally, the Jamie Vanderbilt script for this film had Peter Parker as a high school student, and the assumption was that Sony would cast young so that they could do several films over the course of high school and college, a la the Brian Bendis take in "Ultimate Spider-Man."  What we're hearing now though is that Parker starts the series as a college student, and that makes more sense with this casting.

Read Full Post
<p>Jason Segal sat down to discuss 'Despicable Me' and his upcoming Muppet movie recently.</p>

Jason Segal sat down to discuss 'Despicable Me' and his upcoming Muppet movie recently.

Credit: HitFix

Watch: Jason Segel talks about 'Despicable Me' and the Muppets

Animation and puppets and sitcoms, oh my

I've spent a fair amount of time now talking with Jason Segel about his various projects, and from the first time I met him on the set of "Forgetting Sarah Marshall," he's been talking about his love for the Muppets and his desire to make a Muppet movie.

So even though I sat down with him at the Four Seasons last week to talk about "Despicable Me," the new animated film where he plays Vector, the bad guy of the film.  It was good to catch up with Segel, who seems to be enjoying his hiatus from "How I Met Your Mother," and his enthusiasm for this film and for his upcoming Muppets collaboration is evident in the conversation.

It's funny... last week was a very Apatow week for me, even though Judd wasn't involved at all.  Monday started with Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg at the "Green Hornet" event, I ended up seeing "Dinner For Schmucks" and discussing it with Steve Carell, I met Martin Starr at that screening, and then I wrapped it up with Segel at the Four Seasons.  That's in addition to the "Scott Pilgrim" event just before that, with Michael Cera front and center.  It strikes me that even with Apatow taking things easy right now, and deservedly so, the ripple effect of the run of movies he wrote, directed, or produced between "The 40-Year-Old Virgin" and "Funny People" is enormous, and still playing out.

Read Full Post
<p>This is probably the only moment in the entire film that made me smile, and they still managed to screw up Appa as a character. &nbsp;Amazing.</p>

This is probably the only moment in the entire film that made me smile, and they still managed to screw up Appa as a character.  Amazing.

Credit: Paramount Pictures

The M/C Review: 'The Last Airbender' will disappoint both fans and newcomers

M. Night Shyamalan's career ends with a whimper, not a bang

I just realized that I never even bothered to review "The Happening." 

Wow.  I'm not sure what surprises me more... the fact that I just plain skipped discussing an M. Night Shyamalan film, or the fact that I didn't even remember if I'd written about it or not.  I've been writing about Shyamalan's work since 1998 at least, when I covered "Wide Awake."  I was already a fan at that time thanks to the scripts he'd written for "Labor Of Love," "Stuart Little," and "The Sixth Sense," and I spent a lot of time talking him up, calling him one of the best writers in the business.

What a difference 12 years makes, because with "The Last Airbender," the ride is finally over. 

Over the last few films he made, I've been saying that Shyamalan's priorities as a filmmaker had shifted, and he had become a much better director than writer.  Now, based on the evidence of this film, based on the acclaimed Nickelodeon TV series, I'd say he's not particularly good at either of those skill sets anymore.  "The Last Airbender" is a total stiff, and a disappointment for fans of the show as well as a confusing mess for anyone who's never seen an episode.

I was late to the party with the TV show.  I don't spend a lot of time watching Nickelodeon, oddly, but after hearing enough talk about it to make me curious, Paramount sent me one of the five-episode DVD collections they put out, and I checked it out.  Even picking up mid-series and just watching a few episodes, I was immediately taken with the show's energy and style and approach to character.  It's sort of like watching a slightly sillier Miyazaki film each week, full of the same genuine spirituality as Miyazaki's best work, but unafraid of broad and goofy humor at times.  The action on the show is inventive and unique, and the way the series builds from year to year is focused and controlled and eventually pays off in an experience that pays off in ways that few "kid-oriented" shows ever even attempt, much less accomplish.

Read Full Post
<p>The characters created by Charles Addams have survived numerous interpretations including a current run on Broadway, but will Tim Burton have anything new to say in stop-motion?</p>

The characters created by Charles Addams have survived numerous interpretations including a current run on Broadway, but will Tim Burton have anything new to say in stop-motion?

Credit: Charles Addams Foundation

On Tim Burton, 'Addams Family,' and the death of creativity

Go ahead, Tim, you might as well... you've already given up

I don't think it would surprise anyone to learn that Charles Addams was a major influence on the artistic style of a young Tim Burton.  I'm sure Edward Gorey and Gahan Wilson were equally influential in terms of ghoulish silly sensibility, but when you look at the black and white line work of Charles Addams, you see the direct precursor to almost every one of Burton's signature quirks.

That's cool.  Burton wears his childhood influences like an open book, like many great visual stylists do, and in his case, he's always been partial to a mix of the morbid and the hilarious.  Addams is the master of that.  I would argue that more people know his style from the original '60s TV show "The Addams Family" or the feature films that were made in the '90s than are actually familiar with his cartoons.

Understandably.  Right now, the one place you can read the amazing work that Addams left behind is in those weird book things. The Addams family (the real one, not the creepy ooky kooky one) has worked hard to keep his work off of the Internet.  There are only a handful of his hundreds of cartoons online, and since it's so important to the estate, I won't reprint one here as an example.  The reality is, it's far more likely that people stumbled across the TV show or the movies or the animated cartoon versions that have existed at various times, simply because that stuff is actively out there, easy to stumble over.

Read Full Post
<p>Johnny Depp is playing the title character in Gore Verbinski's animated 'Rango,' and there's a full-length trailer for the film now.</p>

Johnny Depp is playing the title character in Gore Verbinski's animated 'Rango,' and there's a full-length trailer for the film now.

Credit: Paramount Pictures

Watch: Gore Verbinski and Johnny Depp reunite for weird and playful 'Rango'

Who exactly is this animated film intended to entertain?

For the most part, animation is controlled by a few very loud voices in the industry, and there is little room for people to experiment with it, particularly at the studio level.

That's a shame.  Because animation is a medium with near-limitless storytelling potential, and year after year, film after film, we essentially see the same types of stories with the same types of characters and the same sort of authorial voice, an echo chamber in which you either tell stories for children, or you don't tell stories.  And you tell them in a very familiar way, so as not to freak anybody out.

Sure, we've got Pixar, and I have been vocal about how much I admire their work, but I don't think that should be the only strong voice out there in animation.  Disney, Dreamworks, Aardman... they've all contributed strong films to the mix, but that's still just a very narrow range of stories being told.

What we don't see much of are filmmakers who have strong voices who decide to just make an animated film. Robert Zemeckis is a rare example, and he sort of took the all-or-nothing route, building an infrastructure and working with the same technology from film to film, polishing his technique, experimenting.  Seeing Spielberg and Jackson jump into "Tintin" together is a thrill, and I hope they crush it.  I hope they make these movies that are basically like jumping into the world that Herge created.

Read Full Post
<p>Forget all this Team Jacob... Team Edward... how about we double-team Bella?</p>

Forget all this Team Jacob... Team Edward... how about we double-team Bella?

Credit: Summit Entertainment

The M/C Review: 'The Twilight Saga: Eclipse' offers more energy, but still disappoints

Is being the best 'Twilight' film really something to be proud of?

I think it really just comes down to one inescapable fact:  I hate Bella Swan.

I suspect my real problems lie with Stephenie Meyer and Melissa Rosenberg, the novelist and screenwriter responsible for "The Twilight Saga," and, by extension, Bella Swan.  But it does not change how completely I hate Bella Swan.

Bella Swan, for those of you fortunate enough not to be "Twilight" savvy at this point, is the main character in "The Twilight Saga."  Kristen Stewart has become a superstar playing the character, although I'd argue we have yet to see any proof that her fanbase will follow her after the franchise is done.  She is the teenage girl who finds herself torn between her affections for Jacob (Taylor Lautner), a Native American werewolf, and Edward (Robert Pattinson), a sparkly vampire.  She is a rotten, rotten person as written, and the fact that the entire series just serves as an extension of her desires and goals has managed now to make me feel like a bad person just for sitting in the theater and watching her.

I never reviewed the first "Twilight" film.  I didn't see it in any sort of timely manner.  I did, however, review "New Moon" last year, and here's what I wrote about that film:

Read Full Post
<p>Emma Watson stars as Hermione one last time in 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows'</p>

Emma Watson stars as Hermione one last time in 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows'

Credit: Warner Bros.

Watch: 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows' trailer promises epic finish

Can anything live up to the promise of this trailer?

Well, you can't accuse Warner Bros. of playing this one down.

I'm already watching people moan and groan on Twitter and message boards about the claim that this is "the motion picture event of a generation," but if any upcoming film gets to claim that early, the last two "Harry Potter" movies would fit the bill.

I find the films sort of amazing.  The fact that they even finished the series with the original cast in place is remarkable.  The fact that there's been a learning curve and we're actually seeing the films continue to get better as they wind up to the finish is almost beyond belief.  Shouldn't they just be coasting?  Shouldn't they be phoning it in by this point?

That trailer is not the sign of a franchise that is phoning it in.  This looks so ambitious, and it looks like they know that they get to basically play the entire two films at a crescendo that they've earned in the previous six movies.  Ralph Fiennes is so freaky in that make-up, and the digital work they've done on him works perfectly.  It doesn't look like an effect.  It looks real.  And it looks wrong. 

The kids have grown into really strong actors, the world has grown darker in keeping with the ideas each movie deals with, and the magic has grown into something potentially scary and dangerous this time around.

These are going to be huge, both in impact and in content, and I can't wait.

Read Full Post