<p>Viggo Mortensen and Kodi-Smit McPhee play a father and son lost in a ruined world in John Hillcoat's film adaptation of &quot;The Road&quot;</p>

Viggo Mortensen and Kodi-Smit McPhee play a father and son lost in a ruined world in John Hillcoat's film adaptation of "The Road"

Credit: The Weinstein Company

Watch: Viggo Mortensen talks about life on 'The Road'

Joined by his young co-star, the 'Lord Of The Rings' vet opens up

I've always been a fan of Viggo Mortensen's work, at least since the first time I really noticed him in a film back in "The Indian Runner," which nailed me to a wall.  One of the things that I enjoyed most about watching the "Lord Of The Rings" phenomenon explode was seeing the general public discover Mortensen on a level that had never happened before.

Since then, he's had several big moments, most notably his collaborations with David Cronenberg, and now he's about to find himself back in theaters in the adaptation of Cormac McCarthy's piercing, difficult novel The Road.  While I was in Toronto, I had a chance to sit down with both Mortensen and his young co-star, Kodi Smit-McPhee, and ask them about the process of working together to create a believable father-son relationship onscreen.

A quick note... we're not in control of the technical side of these interviews, so sometimes we find ourselves working with whatever we've got when we leave the room.  In this case, I am baffled by the sound mix on this thing.  My microphone was evidently taped to one of my buttcheeks based on how muffled I am when talking, and Mortensen is such a soft-spoken guy in real life that even if they'd put the microphone inside his mouth, I'm not sure it would have been much better than this.

His answers are still worth a listen, though.  Just crank it up after the film clips end:

Read Full Post
<p>Sandra Bullock plays real-life force of nature Leigh Anne Touhy in 'The Blind Side'&nbsp;</p>

Sandra Bullock plays real-life force of nature Leigh Anne Touhy in 'The Blind Side' 

Credit: Warner Bros.

The M/C Interview: Leigh Anne Touhy tells her story in 'The Blind Side'

Meet the woman Sandra Bullock plays in the new film

This is an unusual interview for me.  I'm used to talking to writers, directors, actors, producers, cinematographer, editors... all the people typically involved with making movies.  It's much more uncommon for me to hop on the phone with someone whose life has been turned into a movie, the "based on" in the "based on a true story" equation.

With Leigh Anne Touhy, I figured it would be interesting to give it a try.  She's presented as such a dynamo in the new film from John Lee Hancock, with Sandra Bullock doing some of her best dramatic work playing her, that I knew it wouldn't be boring.

LEIGH ANNE TOUHY:  Hello, Drew, how are you?

DREW MCWEENY:  I'm fine, Mrs. Touhy. It’s a pleasure to meet you.

LAT:  Well, thank you so much. You’re a boy Drew.  I knew a Drew could be a girl or a boy.

DM:  Yes.  I am a boy Drew.

LAT:  You’re a boy Drew.  Okay, then!

DM:   My parents both attended Ole Miss.

LAT:  Yeah?  Then you’re a wonderful boy Drew.

Read Full Post
<p>Black Cat has a &nbsp;long and rich history as a character in the Spider-Man universe, and now Marvel may be bringing her to the big screen</p>

Black Cat has a  long and rich history as a character in the Spider-Man universe, and now Marvel may be bringing her to the big screen

Credit: Marvel Comics

Who's playing The Black Cat in 'Spider-Man 4,' and why should you care?

Lesser-known Marvel character takes center stage in online catch-your-tail

When even Nikki Finke decides to throw her hat in on a geek movie rumor, it's time to talk about it.

I'm not a fan of this point in the casting process, when names start flying and people start reporting non-news breathlessly every day.  It's one thing when we get down to the point of people doing screen tests... those are serious contenders for something.  But just coming in to meet the producers on a meet and greet does not mean someone is "in talks" for a role. It sounds to me like right now, "Spider-Man 4" is at the stage where they are casting a wide next, looking for someone to step in and play The Black Cat, aka Felicia Hardy, one of the many ohmygodhawt female antagonists who have tormented Peter Parker over the years.

At this point, it seems to be accepted as fact that Felicia Hardy is in the film.  In truth, all we've heard officially is that they are looking for a new "female lead," and that they are not replacing Kirsten Dunst.  Much of what I'm reading about this particular actor search is speculation, which is one of the reasons I've been slow to pick the story up.  I've been waiting to see if my own sources could cough up something I could treat as fact.  So far, all is quiet, though, which is strange.  If this is such a hotly debated part, and they're really looking at names like Rachel McAdams, Anne Hathaway, Romola Garai, and Julia Stiles, then why is everything so quiet in the places I'm looking?

Read Full Post
<p>Michael Sheen provides one of the few bright spots in the otherwise painful 'New Moon,' opening in every theater in America this weekend&nbsp;</p>

Michael Sheen provides one of the few bright spots in the otherwise painful 'New Moon,' opening in every theater in America this weekend 

Credit: Summit Entertainment

The M/C Review: 'Twilight: New Moon' marks a franchise on the wane

Creatively speaking, these vampires are dead, dead, dead

Oh, boy.

I did not see the first "Twilight" in the theater. I wasn't actively against it, but I also recognized early on that it most likely was not made for me.  And I don't operate under the illusion that all films must please me in order to justify their existence.  I did eventually catch up with it, and I thought it was an entirely harmless teen romance/angst film that worked primarily because there was a tangible tension between the two leads.  I thought it was visually dull with some laughable imagery, but again... harmless.  I didn't weigh in on it because I didn't feel strongly enough about it one way or another, and I didn't see it in a timely enough manner for my opinion to make any difference to anyone.

Over this first year at HitFix, I've watched the way Greg Ellwood has done his best to serve the "Twilight" community, one of many web writers who has absolutely treated that crowd with respect and who goes out of his way to gather every tidbit of information that he can pass along to them.  Yes, it means traffic for the site, but in watching his engagements with them and in dealing with them in passing at Comic-Con or in e-mail or on the site or on Twitter, I've always found them to be polite and friendly and enthusiastic in all the best ways.  Bitter fanboys can rail about the "Twilight" fans all they want, but I'll take a bunch of screaming girls who just want to like what they like over a bunch of miserable boys who hate everything and nitpick the movies that were made expressly to service their whims and fetishes.  At least the screaming girls are having fun.

So if you're a "Twilight" fan and you already know you're going to go see "New Moon" this weekend 76 times, then don't bother reading the rest of this review.  You know more about the characters and what you like about this series than I'll ever know, and my take on things probably isn't going to please you.  I'll give the series another shot next year, and we'll talk again then.

If you're like me, though, someone looking in at this phenomenon from the outside, then read on, because I definitely had a reaction to the film tonight.  Probably not the one the filmmakers were hoping for, but a reaction nonetheless.

"The Twilight Saga: New Moon," from the title down to the closing credits, personifies the major problem with franchise filmmaking these days, and it's the difference between the ones that get it right and the ones that get it wrong.

"The Twilight Saga: New Moon" plays like a 130 minute trailer for a movie called "The Twilight Saga: New Moon".

When franchise filmmaking works, it works because it's a TV episode that makes us want to see what happens next.  It works because of energy and chemistry and a sort of connection with the audience.  It's certainly not easy.  The first two "Harry Potter" movies are solid, sturdy, and sort of boring.  They're not bad films, but they're certainly not great films.  They did, however, feel like films.  They were long, they rambled, but there was always a sense that the films had to be truly grand.  When you see the movie, it's the fulfillment of a promise that the trailer makes, and a movie like this one just plays like a trailer all the way through.  It's all promise, all build-up, all tease, and because of how clumsy the world-building is, it's not a promise I particularly care to see fulfilled.  Break the promise.  Fine by me.

Read Full Post
<p>John Lee Hancock discusses a scene with Sandra Bullock on the set of 'The Blind Side'</p>

John Lee Hancock discusses a scene with Sandra Bullock on the set of 'The Blind Side'

Credit: Warner Bros.

The M/C Interview: John Lee Hancock discusses 'The Blind Side'

How do you turn a real-life story into a feel-good Hollywood movie?

John Lee Hancock's track record so far is a solid one.  Imagine having two of your earliest scripts directed by Clint Eastwood.  Hancock wrote both "A Perfect World" and "Midnight In The Garden Of Good And Evil" for the legendary filmmaker before he moved into directing himself with "The Rookie," a generally well-liked Dennis Quaid movie based on a true story about a guy who was, by most standards, over the hill, but who managed to get a shot in Major League Baseball.

"The Rookie" worked because it never wallowed in sentiment, and it seemed like a film that managed to avoid the most cloying tendencies of the sports drama.  If I'd known before I walked into the theater that Hancock was the director of "The Blind Side," I probably would have been more interested in it, but maybe that was a good thing.  It let the film sneak up on me, and I ended up enjoying it a lot.  As a result, I was pleased to sit down and chat with Hancock about the film and his work on it:

JOHN LEE HANCOCK:  Hi, Drew.

DREW MCWEENY:  Hi, John, how are you?

JLH:  I’m well. You?

DM:  Very well, thanks.

JLH:  Good.

DM:  Wanted to tell you what a pleasant surprise the film was, sir.

Read Full Post
<p>Ed Norton, ten years ago, ripping it up Fincher style in 'Fight Club'&nbsp;</p>

Ed Norton, ten years ago, ripping it up Fincher style in 'Fight Club' 

Credit: 20th Century Fox

DVD & Games Forecast: 'Star Trek,' 'Fight Club,' and 'Bruno' lead this week's BluRay charge

Plus game fans face an expensive week with 'Assassin's Creed' and 'Left 4 Dead' sequels

STAR TREK! FIGHT CLUB! OMFG!

That's how I feel, anyway.  It's a great week overall, but the BluRay nerd in me wins for sheer unbridled enthusiasm.  And speaking of OMFG and enthusiasm, did you guys see "Curb" on Sunday night?  Between Bob Einstein's joke and the Michael Richards moment and the big finish with Larry, I sort of can't believe that even exists.  Hats.  Off.

The Christmas season is well underway, and as is true of music, today is pretty much D-Day for a lot of the giant holiday titles hitting shelves.  It's one of those weeks where there is 100% no way I could afford to pick up everything that interests me.  These titles will be trickling into my house over the next few weeks as I find them on sale or used or at discount, because it's a flood.  There are so many things, all worth my attention this week, and as a result, it's a particularly good week of featured titles.  Or at least I think so... see if you agree... 

THIS WEEK'S FEATURED TITLES:

"Star Trek" (BluRay/DVD)

I'm a fan.  And no matter what version of this you pick up today, you're in for a treat.

"Fight Club" (BluRay)

It's about time.  I'm glad to see this arrive just in time for people to reflect on the film's ten-year anniversary and offer the film some attention and respect.  I remember when it was released and Roger Ebert dismissed it as a "macho wheezy porn trick."  I couldn't disagree more strongly, and although I think David Fincher has grown as a filmmaker since he made this movie, I think it's going to take a lot for something to replace this as my favorite film that Fincher's ever made.

Read Full Post
<p>Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you... Captain Nemo!&nbsp;</p>

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you... Captain Nemo! 

Credit: AP Photo/Chris Pizzello

McG's proposed '20,000 Leagues' may stay submerged

Is the update to the Jules Verne classic dead in the water?

Well, I can't say I'm surprised.

Michael Fleming has confirmed that both Disney and McG have agreed to suspend work on the film.  McG moves on to whatever he's going to do next, and Disney focuses on other projects.  They really only pulled the trigger on this film in the first place, announcing the deals and making some noise about it, in order to derail another "20,000 Leagues" project.  Disney has had a fairly healthy ownership of the title for about a half-century now, and I think they wanted to keep it a Disney property.

Maybe this will kickstart that David Fincher version again.

Remember that one?  David Fincher directing, Sam Raimi producing, script by Craig Titley?

McG talked about having Will Smith play Captain Nemo, and he said he was absolutely serious about making it his next movie.  Unless you have the right script, though, there's no reason to do it.  There's nothing about it that demands that it be remade right now.  People aren't out there crying for more Victorian adventure films set on submarines.  I have a feeling the Disney version would look a lot like "Pirates Of The Caribbean" if it got made.  Because all the live-action stuff DIsney's making that is aiming for that audience all looks pretty much exactly like "Pirates Of The Caribbean."

Read Full Post
<p>Derek Haas, screenwriter of 'Wanted' and '3:10 To Yuma,' has a new novel out called 'Columbus,' a follow-up to his earlier thriller 'The Silver Bear'</p>

Derek Haas, screenwriter of 'Wanted' and '3:10 To Yuma,' has a new novel out called 'Columbus,' a follow-up to his earlier thriller 'The Silver Bear'

Credit: Derek Haas

The M/C Review: The screenwriter of 'Wanted' returns with 'Columbus,' his second novel

Hitman thriller pulls no punches

Have you visited Popcorn Fiction yet?

If not, you should.  Derek Haas, co-screenwriter of "3:10 To Yuma" and "Wanted," created a site to publish original short fiction, but that would let the authors keep their own copyrights to the stories.  Great idea, and it's already paid off when Haas optioned his own story "Shake" to Jerry Bruckheimer.  Guys like Scott Frank, Patton Oswalt, Brian Helgeland, and Mark "Smilin' Jack Ruby" Wheaton have all published stories there already, and I'm sure there are enough interested writers to keep the site viable and lively for years to come.

I'm not surprised to see Haas encouraging other screenwriters to tackle prose.  He published a novel last year called The Silver Bear, a tough, gorgeous crime novel about an assassin who is the best in the business until some personal blind spots almost cost him his life.  Now Haas is back with a new novel, a sequel to his first one, and Columbus is absolutely one of the best reads I've had this year.

Columbus is the name the main character and narrator of both books goes by, but it's not his real name.  I have a feeling Haas may never tell us his real name, because (A) it wouldn't really mean anything to us and (B) it's just plain cooler this way.  Columbus is what they call "a silver bear," from the shelf above the top shelf, the best in the business.  This is a guy who will finish any contract he's given, no matter what, or die trying.  

Read Full Post
<p>&nbsp;Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster star in the intense, heartbroken drama 'The Messenger'</p>

 Woody Harrelson and Ben Foster star in the intense, heartbroken drama 'The Messenger'

Credit: Oscilloscope Productions

The M/C Review: Woody Harrelson goes intimate in 'The Messenger'

Screenwriter of 'I'm Not There' and 'Jesus' Son' makes strong directorial debut

When I hear people lump all movies that deal with our modern military into one category, the "Iraq movies," it seems to me that it's an easy way of dismissing the films without actually processing them.

For example, can you really say that "The Messenger," the hearbroken new film from Oren Moverman, is the same genre as Katherine Bigelow's ferocious "The Hurt Locker"?  Both of them deal with soldiers who are altered permanently by their service to their country, but the films play out in such different ways that anything other than a surface comparison is unfair.  Just another reminder how reductive much of what we say about films truly is, and how easy it can be to scare off an audience from a film that might well resonate with them if they gave it a chance.

"The Messenger" deals with one of the nastiest, ugliest necessary evils of military life, the soldiers who make the notifications to the next of kin when a serviceman is killed in the line of duty.  Ben Foster, perpetually wired too tight, stars here as Staff Sgt. Will Montgomery, stateside after an IED went off and nearly killed him.  He's facing down the end of his latest tour and contemplating what he's going to do once his time is up, and the Army offers him a short-term assignment helping Captain Tony Stone notify families.

Stone is played by Woody Harrelson, and when you put Harrelson and Foster onscreen alone for the majority of the running time, just the two of them throwing crazy at each other like they're having a pie fight in a Three Stooges film, the results could easily be indulgent or unwatchable.  Credit Moverman, then, with reigning in both of these crazy horses and eliciting strong, moving, sad performances from both.  I don't mind scenery chewing under the right circumstances, but too much of it can ruin an actor and teach them some really lazy habits.  

Read Full Post
<p>Chekov (Anton Yelchin), Kirk (Chris Pine), Scotty (Simon Pegg), McCoy (Karl Urban) and Sulu (John Cho), together for the first time in the JJ Abrams version of 'Star Trek'</p>

Chekov (Anton Yelchin), Kirk (Chris Pine), Scotty (Simon Pegg), McCoy (Karl Urban) and Sulu (John Cho), together for the first time in the JJ Abrams version of 'Star Trek'

Credit: Paramount Home Video

The M/C Review: 'Star Trek' BluRay delivers on every level

Extra features, a great transfer, and a movie worth revisiting... what more could you ask?

Toshi's no dope.

He is growing up in a sci-fi movie, and at the age of four, he treats technology that blows my mind with a casual "yeah, yeah, what else you got?" attitude that cracks me up.  He knows what a BluRay is now.  He knows that Daddy treats the DVDs a little more rough and tumble than he handles the BluRays.  He knows that if something shows up on BluRay, most likely it's going to be for watching in Daddy's office, and that is something he really wants to get in on.  As much as humanly possible.

So about four days after we saw the latest "Star Trek" film in a theater, an event which sort of changed his life, he started asking me about when the movie would show up at our house on BluRay.  And asking.  And asking.  And asking.  Because when you're four, you have nothing else to worry about.  You're not thinking about the mortgage or what to do for your dissertation or insurance issues or anything else... you're fixated on when you'll have "Star Trek" in your house so you can watch it eighteen billion times a week.

This past week, an envelope arrived while he was at school with the "Star Trek" BluRay inside.  I opened it, then decided to put the disc back in the envelope and wait for him to get home.  When he did, my wife hid outside my office, and we arranged the blinds so we could record his reaction when I handed him the envelope so he could see what was inside.  When he's much older and he asks me why he has so much trouble talking to girls, I'll show him his spontaneous geeksplosion upon recognizing the "Star Trek" cover as a way of answering that question.  This acorn fell pretty close to the tree, so to speak.

Read Full Post