<p>Anne Hathaway is rumored to be playing the Black Cat in &quot;Spider-Man 4.&quot;</p>

Anne Hathaway is rumored to be playing the Black Cat in "Spider-Man 4."

Credit: AP Photo

Are John Malkovich and Anne Hathaway the villains in 'Spider-Man 4'?

And if so, who are they playing?

I don't know what to think about this latest "Spider-Man 4" rumor from Movieline.

John Malkovich as The Vulture?  I can get behind that.  He's physically right for the part, and he's at the age where he suggests the way the character was written, but he's still got the right stamina to actually play the part.  And certainly he's a great actor, and a great villain if the material is right.  And, let's not forget, he was one of the actors considered for The Green Goblin for the original "Spider-Man," and was evidently a real possibility at one point before the role eventually went to Willem Dafoe.

We've mentioned the hunt for Felicia Hardy here on the site before, but if this Movieline article is accurate, the character isn't going to be the character we think she is.   And this is by far the strangest decision they've made yet on this series, and that's saying something after the dance number in "Spider-Man 3."

Felicia Hardy in the comics is a character named The Black Cat.  She's basically Catwoman for the Marvel Universe, a thief of some moral complexity who sometimes romances Spider-Man and sometimes fights him. Hot girl.  Tight costume.  Pretty simple stuff.  And Anne Hathaway, who is alleged to be getting closer and closer to signing for the role, would certainly fill out the spandex well.  She's engaging, she's funny, she's gorgeous and she's physically substantial, so I could actually buy her in the action scenes.

Read Full Post
<p>Even though Bela Lugosi's Dracula has remained iconic for over 70 years, filmmakers keep trying to redefine him on the bigscreen, and it looks like Summit's 'Vlad' will be the latest attempt&nbsp;</p>

Even though Bela Lugosi's Dracula has remained iconic for over 70 years, filmmakers keep trying to redefine him on the bigscreen, and it looks like Summit's 'Vlad' will be the latest attempt 

Credit: Universal Home Video

Summit cheats on 'Twilight' with the world's most famous vampire

Is there room for two bloodsuckers at the studio?

Jeeez, Summit.  If you love vampires so much, why don't you marry them?

Oh, wait, I think you probably are in one of the next few "Twilight" movies.  Just goes to show you, no one has more riding on the continuing relevance of vampires as cultural icons than Summit Entertainment.  The second installment of the "Twilight" series was released last month, and since then, "New Moon" has earned 275 grazillion dollars.  Roughly.

Now they're trying to do the one thing that "Twilight" would never be accused of doing:  they want to scare you. And it looks like actor Charlie Hunnam, best known for "Sons Of Anarchy" and "Undeclared," is the writer of the film.  It surprises me, not because I have any idea whether Hunnam can write or not, but because I didn't realize he was even interested.

How do you make vampires scary again?  Fair question right now, when their popularity has very little to do with them as icons of fear and everything to do with the way they serve as sexual metaphor.  And even worse, how do you make Dracula scary?  Or even interesting?  What remains unsaid when talking about the character or the historical inspiration, Vlad Tepes?  It seems that Hunnam is interested in a younger, earlier incarnation of the character, which explains his title:  "Vlad."

Read Full Post
<p>Saoirse Ronan and Peter Jackson on location during the shoot of 'The Lovely Bones,' based on Alice Sebold's acclaimed novel&nbsp;</p>

Saoirse Ronan and Peter Jackson on location during the shoot of 'The Lovely Bones,' based on Alice Sebold's acclaimed novel 

Credit: Matt Mueller/Paramount Pictures

'You are invited to join Peter Jackson for a cocktail reception'

Is there such a thing as a casual conversation during awards season?

I don't care how long I do this for a living or how long I work in Los Angeles.  I'm never going to get cynical about time spent talking to people I respect about the art form and the technical craft that I love. I still think it's a gift every time I get an invitation to some event that offers me a unique opportunity like the one that presented itself last Friday night.

"Paramount Pictures invites you to join director Peter Jackson and the cast of 'The Lovely Bones' for a private cocktail reception."

That's what the invite said when it showed up, and you never really know what that means. Private? Is that 20 people? 40? 100?  All it really means is that it's not open to the general public, right?

I already had reason to be at the Four Seasons, since I had TV interviews scheduled with Morgan Freeman and Matt Damon upstairs as part of the "Invictus" junket. You'll see that here later this week, and it's good.  I was the last person of the day, after a long day of one after another, and the fact that both guys gave me such sincere and thoughtful answers was nice of them.  It's brief, as all of those TV spots are, and not much of an actual in-depth interview.  Those are more like you ask one or two good questions, and you're out.  Something simple and fun that lets them show a little personality or tell a good story.

They're not really conversations, though, are they?

Read Full Post
<p>Penelope Cruz is just one of the women in the life of Guido Contini (played by Daniel Day Lewis) in the new musical 'Nine'&nbsp;</p>

Penelope Cruz is just one of the women in the life of Guido Contini (played by Daniel Day Lewis) in the new musical 'Nine' 

Credit: The Weinstein Company

The M/C Review: Rob Marshall takes on Fellini in 'Nine' with an all-star cast

Does his return to the musical deliver or does he come up short?

"Nine" is the movie that the detractors of "Chicago" accused it of being. 

Like "Chicago," Rob Marshall is working from a major Broadway show.  He's made a very specific stylistic choice, dictated in no small part by the work of a very strong screenwriter.  On "Chicago," it was braniac Bill Condon, whose cellular-level understanding of musicals, even in casual conversation, is amazing.  And he cracked that film's conceit in the script.  Here, Anthony Minghella was the guy who really did the heavy lifting. Michael Tolkin did some early work on the film, adapting the stage production written by Arthur Kopit and Maury Yeston, who also wrote some new material for the film as well, who were themselves adapting a stage production by Mario Fratti, inspired by the film by Federico Fellini.

That's a lot of hands for something to go through, and when you consider how personal "8 1/2" was for Fellini, it seems doubly strange for this many people to spend this much time and energy retelling the story. It's not like this is some universal tale that everyone can relate to:  it's the story of a director of several major cultural hit films who is finding himself blocked as he approaches the start of production on his next film, even as he juggles a wife and a mistress who both feel neglected.

Read Full Post
<p>Jeff Bridges and Maggie Gyllenhaal co-star in the tender-hearted drama 'Crazy Heart'&nbsp;</p>

Jeff Bridges and Maggie Gyllenhaal co-star in the tender-hearted drama 'Crazy Heart' 

Credit: Fox Searchlight

The M/C Review: Jeff Bridges hits every note right in 'Crazy Heart'

Small-scale country-music drama gets everything right

I'll say it.  We're all itching to say it.  This movie gives us yet another in a long line of opportunities to say it.

Jeff Bridges is one of the all-time hall-of-fame no-debate greats.

Watching his body of work unfold is a pleasure.  That's the long and short of it.  There are certain actors whose careers result from the undeniable truth that watching them perform is a pure honey pleasure.  Always. Predictably.  Jeff Bridges has always been at the very least good, but in the last twenty years or so, he's evolved into something so pure and joyous to behold that when he runs into a piece of material that's worthy of the thunder he can call down, it's an event.

He slips on the character of Bad Blake, a country music singer limping through a dog's ass of a career, old and bloated and perpetually drunk, like it's a worn denim jacket, something familiar, something shaped just like him.  By the end of the film, you'd be forgiven if you think this is just like last year's "The Wrestler," with real-life adding the friction to the onscreen drama.  In that film, you know that Mickey Rourke is really a guy who wrestles powerful demons every day, every hour, just to keep himself together enough to make a living at his craft.  His character is, and so is he.  The same is true of the shockingly good "JCVD," where the big monologue moment of clarity for Jean Claude Van Damme is so naked and personal that you can't believe he would sit still and allow it to be recorded.  Here, Bridges convinces as a train wreck still moving forward out of sheer force of habit.

Read Full Post
<p>Steven Spielberg has spent most of the year trying to get a remake of 'Harvey' ready to shoot in the spring of 2010&nbsp;</p>

Steven Spielberg has spent most of the year trying to get a remake of 'Harvey' ready to shoot in the spring of 2010 

Spielberg just can't see 'Harvey'

Director walks away from remake of Jimmy Stewart classic

Can't say I'm exactly heartbroken to hear this.

According to Michael Fleming, Steven Spielberg has notified 20th Century Fox that he won't be using the soundstages they've had reserved for him in the spring of 2010, as he is no longer interested in making "Harvey," based on the Pulitzer Prize winning play by Mary Chase.

The play was famously filmed once before with Jimmy Stewart in the lead role of Elwood P. Dowd, a small-town laughing stock who carries on conversations with a six-foot-tall invisible rabbit named Harvey.  And while I admire the play and the earlier film, I sincerely hope this scuttles this remake altogether.  It wouldn't be the first project that Spielberg torpedoed simply by expressing some interest in it.  In this case, he's been working with Jonathan Tropper, a novelist who is still an unproven quantity as a screenwriter.

Fleming's article says that after Spielberg approached, and was turned down by, the obvious first choice of Tom Hanks, the director then started conversations with Robert Downey Jr.  And while I am a huge fan of Downey, and a big supporter of his recent explosion as a movie star, I think this role would be treading water for him.  I can already picture the entire film... the Janusz Kaminski look, the performance by Downey, and even the uplifting late-career John Williams score.  It's one of those movies that doesn't need to exist because the minute you say what it is, you can picture the entire thing.  It's too obvious.  It's too easy.

Read Full Post
<p>Jay and Mark Duplass, no strangers to Sundance, will be there again this year with their new untitled comedy&nbsp;</p>

Jay and Mark Duplass, no strangers to Sundance, will be there again this year with their new untitled comedy 

Credit: James Rocchi/Cinematical

First Look: Jonah Hill, John C. Reilly and Marisa Tomei head to Sundance

Mark and Jay Duplass have an untitled comedy with a great cast in the fest this year

[This article has been modified from its original text.]

One of last year's big success stories at Sundance was "Humpday," starring Mark Duplass.  He's also one-half of the filmmaking team who made the micro-budget charmer "The Puffy Chair" and the sly mumblecore/horror riff called "Baghead" along with his brother Jay.

I'm not much for the films that are loosely described as "mumblecore."  I think the truth is, though, that a label like that is often something that's created to try and tie together filmmakers who actually have nothing in common.  I think calling the work of the Duplass Brothers mumblecore is reductive and confining.  I think they're making low-budget independent films, and they don't need to be labeled any more than that.

I was talking to Josh Leonard, Mark's co-star in "Humpday," when I saw him on the set of "Sherlock Holmes," and he spoke with admiration about the way the Duplass Brothers work. This was before "Humpday" was on anyone's radar, back in November of 2008, and Leonard was still pinning down the details of his own directorial debut.  It was obvious as he spoke that he had nothing but admiration for the way the Duplass Brothers were maintaining a sense of independence even as they took their first step forward with a studio as a partner.  It is rare that a filmmaker who comes out of such a deeply independent scene manages to find a way to successfully cross over into the studio system without compromising who they are or what they make, but Leonard seemed to feel like the Duplass Brothers had done just that, and early word on this one indicates that they've pulled it off.

Read Full Post
<p>Kristen Stewart plays Joan Jett and Dakota Fanning plays Cherie Currie in 'The Runaways,' a biopic that reunites the two 'New Moon' stars&nbsp;</p>

Kristen Stewart plays Joan Jett and Dakota Fanning plays Cherie Currie in 'The Runaways,' a biopic that reunites the two 'New Moon' stars 

Credit: River Road Entertainment

Sundance Film Festival announces its 2010 out-of-competition schedule

Kristen Stewart's got a second film in the fest, Louis CK stand-up plays, and midnight gets crazy

It's going to be a very interesting year at Sundance.  Because there has been some shakeup behind the scenes, the selection process and the programming process have gone through a shift as well.  A producer friend of mine who has had several films play at the festival was told that his latest efforts were all very good but that there was no room for them this year because "they're too much like the old Sundance."

So what does that mean?  Obviously, Sundance is still choosing from the independent cinema that's ready and available, but will it feel like Sundance this year?  We ran the full list of in-competition films yesterday, which is promising, and today they've announced everything else that will be showing up, including two new sections.  One is called "NEXT," and offers up first films, while the other is called "Spotlight," which allows them to show film that have already screened elsewhere, something Sundance usually frowns on, and taken as a whole, it's a pretty hefty list.  I'm already feeling overwhelmed, and later this week, I'll put together my list of the 20 films I'm most looking forward to at Sundance.  For now, though, here's the full list, section by section:

PREMIERES
 
To showcase the diversity to contemporary independent cinema, the Sundance Film Festival Premieres section offers the latest work from American and international directors as well as world premieres of highly anticipated films. Presented by Entertainment Weekly.
 
Abel / Mexico, USA (Director: Diego Luna; Screenwriters:Diego Luna and Agusto Mendoza)—A peculiar young boy, blurring reality and fantasy, assumes the responsibilities of a family man in his father's absence. Cast: Jose Maria Yazpik, Karina Gidi, Carlos Aragon, Christopher Ruiz-Esparza, Gerardo Ruiz-Esparza. World Premiere
Read Full Post
<p>Matt Damon strikes an iconic pose for EMPIRE magazine's 20th anniversary celebration&nbsp;</p>

Matt Damon strikes an iconic pose for EMPIRE magazine's 20th anniversary celebration 

Credit: Empire/Keith Bernstein

The Morning Read: Greengrass quits 'Bourne' and "Jackass' goes 3D

Plus wanna read every screenplay produced in 2009?

Welcome to The Morning Read.

Wow.  There's no slow down at all right now.  I keep expecting to hit that holiday lull, and instead, every time I sit down to write up one of these Morning Reads, I'm faced with enough options to make me dizzy.  It's good, I guess... a sign that the industry is healthy.  But it means that these are always tough to compile, and so instead of whining about it, let's just jump right in and see what's going on out there.

Over at The Playlist, they broke the story that Paul Greengrass was dropping out of the development of the next film in the Jason Bourne franchise, and the story escalated when Greengrass released a statement confirming that he would no longer be the man steering the series forward.  I'm sorry to hear it because I think Greengrass took a decent franchise and made it great, but at the same time, I don't really believe we need another film in the series.  Just because the third one made money, there's no reason to automatically do it again.  The law of diminishing returns will kick in eventually, and I have to think that the creative team on the series would rather go out on a high note, while people still like the character, instead of wearing out the welcome completely.  The assumption is that Universal is now going to start talking to other filmmakers, but unless they lock down a script that makes Matt Damon want to do the film, what point is there in talking to directors?  There is no series if Matt Damon moves on, and there's no Matt Damon unless the studio comes up with a compelling reason for him to return, so I think we're a long way from worrying about who sits behind the camera next time.

Rumored last week and finally confirmed this week, I'm very excited about the possibility of seeing "Jackass 3D" sometime next year, and I'd kill to see the tests that Jeff Tremaine is shooting.  Frosty over at Collider recently opined that the camera tech just isn't there yet to make a film like "Jackass" in 3D, but I disagree.  I think that's exactly where we are at this point, and once documentarians start using these new lightweight 3D rigs, I think we're going to see some really outside-the-box applications of the process.  Studios are going to mainly use 3D to try and turn films into events, as with the upcoming "Zombieland 2: 3D", which makes a lot of sense.  I think Ruben Fleischer, who has repeatedly said that he's not a fan of horror films, could end up making something really fun working in 3D, and I'm guessing he'll emphasize the fun and the humor, which is probably right for that series.  What really intrigues me is all the talk from the screenwriters about how they initially planned for "Zombieland" to be a series, so they have material for several movies already blocked out, and they could end up building a really unusual film franchise out of this initial jumping-off point.  We'll see. 

Read Full Post
<p>Bill Murray, Lucas Black, and the great Robert Duvall in 'Get Low,' which will hit theaters sometime in 2010&nbsp;</p>

Bill Murray, Lucas Black, and the great Robert Duvall in 'Get Low,' which will hit theaters sometime in 2010 

Credit: Sony Pictures Classics

Is Robert Duvall the new Quixote for Terry Gilliam?

HitFix heard it direct from the actor's mouth this morning

I'll be bringing you three lovely interviews with the cast of "Crazy Heart" in the days ahead, but before I do, I wanted to run one particular bit of information that I got from one of the actors.

As I spoke with Robert Duvall, a real treat for anyone who has grown up on the films of this remarkable character actor, I asked him what projects he had coming up, either as a producer or as an actor, and he dropped a bombshell on me that I totally wasn't expecting.

"I'm talking to Terry Gilliam about that film of his... I'm going to play Quixote for him."

Wha wha WHA!?

That's right.  We've been hearing since Comic-Con that Gilliam was inching ever closer to getting his long in development "The Man Who Killed Don Quixote" off the ground again.  If you've never seen "Lost In La Mancha," the movie about his first attempt to make the film, it's essential viewing.   

It's also one long heartbreak, because there's no happy ending in that film.  Eventually, "Quixote" shuts down completely and Gilliam appears to be truly defeated by the experience.  He's obviously bounced back since then, but I can't help thinking that every one of these experiences where a film almost happens but then doesn't has to take a toll on a filmmaker, especially when you have many of these incidents over the years.  Poor Gilliam... there's no one more talented who finds himself as destroyed as often by his creative endeavors.  Hollywood is like one great big practical joke on Terry, and it would be nice to see a different punchline for once, one where Gilliam actually makes this film that has haunted him for all these years.

Read Full Post