<p>Ryan Gosling and Michelle Williams star in the hardcore pornographic non-stop snuff machine known only as 'Blue Valentine,' which the MPAA&nbsp;has thankfully saved you from seeing in most theaters.</p>

Ryan Gosling and Michelle Williams star in the hardcore pornographic non-stop snuff machine known only as 'Blue Valentine,' which the MPAA has thankfully saved you from seeing in most theaters.

Credit: The Weinstein Company

The Morning Read: Why is 'Blue Valentine' rated NC-17?

Plus the single best animation you'll see all year

Welcome to The Morning Read.

What a morning.  Although I haven't seen it yet, "My Soul To Take" is getting some blisteringly bad reviews from even the most forgiving horror fans, and one of the things I keep reading is that the 3D conversion was a particularly wretched example of the process.  I have to give real credit to Warner Bros. for issuing the following statements about "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part I" just a little while ago:

"Warner Bros. Pictures has made the decision to release 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1' in 2D, in both conventional and IMAX theaters, as we will not have a completed 3D version of the film within our release date window.  Despite everyone's best efforts, we were unable to convert the film in its entirety and meet the highest standards of quality.  We do not want to disappoint fans who have long-anticipated the conclusion of this extraordinary journey, and to that end, we are releasing our film day-and-date on November 19, 2010 as planned.  WE, in alignment with our filmmakers, believe this is the best course to take in order to ensure that our audiences enjoy the consummate 'Harry Potter' experience."

They say they're still releasing the final film in 3D in July of 2011, which now just feels strange, but the idea of a studio saying that they are intentionally backing off a 3D conversion for technical reasons is impressive.  I wish more studios would take a hard look at what they're releasing and ask if it really works and if it offers anything to the audience.

Read Full Post
Kodi Smit-McPhee

Kodi Smit-McPhee has a dark side

Credit: Overture Films

Novelists Stephen King and Ajvide Lindqvist embrace 'Let Me In'

King calls it the 'best American horror film in the last 20 years'

Novelists who have their works made into films often have contentious relationships with the resulting Hollywood products. Anne Rice called the casting of Tom Cruise as her Vampire Lestat "bizarre" and that he was "no more my Vampire Lestat than Edward G. Robinson is Rhett Butler." She made an about face, however, after seeing the film, praising Cruise to the point of saying "Tom's Lestat will be remembered the way Olivier's Hamlet is remembered."

Stephen King was so unhappy with Stanley Kubrick's version of "The Shining" that he produced his own made for TV version with Steven Webber… we'll just leave that at that. The point is that novelists have a very personal relationship with their novels. They are the sole creators of a universe on paper. Films, on the other hand, are a collaboration of hundreds of people, each one with their own internal vision contributing to the final work on celluloid. This often renders that novelists universe unrecognizable to its creator. It is very rare that a writer wholeheartedly embraces a film version of his or her book, and even more unusual for them to embrace two.

Read Full Post
<p>Ryan Reynolds stars in the claustrophobic thriller 'Buried,' opening today in theaters everywhere</p>

Ryan Reynolds stars in the claustrophobic thriller 'Buried,' opening today in theaters everywhere

Credit: Lionsgate

Interview: Ryan Reynolds and director Rodrigo Cortes discuss 'Buried'

Plus Reynolds talks about that amazing Comic-Con 'Green Lantern' moment

 I may not have been the biggest fan of "Buried" when I saw it at Sundance in January, but there's no denying how effective the work of Ryan Reynolds is, or how inventive the work of Rodrigo Cortes is.  For Reynolds to agree to this film meant knowing that there was no fallback, no parachute, no support system.  It's him onscreen from beginning to end, and no one else.  And for Cortes, he knew that he was really going to have to do it, shoot an entire movie inside a box, never cheating, never cutting to another location.  They had to have total faith in each other.

So it makes sense when I walk into a room at the Four Seasons in Austin, TX and find the two of them sitting together, waiting to discuss their film with me.  This was just a few weeks ago during Fantastic Fest, and I wanted to talk to Reynolds a little bit about his appearance in July at Comic-Con as well.  I'm still learning how to record audio on my Macbook Pro, which I've only had for a month, and it took me a minute to get the thing rolling.  Finally, I managed to hit record and take my seat.

Obviously, this has been the year of the closed-space movies.  I just saw "127 Hours" at Toronto, and we've already seen "Devil" and "Frozen".  Of them all, "Buried" is the only one that never cheats, that never leaves the claustrophobic space or the hopeless situation.  The technical challenge of that is daunting, to say the least, and I asked Garcia if he ever hesitated after reading the script.


Read Full Post
<p>Josh Duhamel and Katherine Heigl co-star in the utterly phony 'Life As We Know It'</p>

Josh Duhamel and Katherine Heigl co-star in the utterly phony 'Life As We Know It'

Credit: Warner Bros.

Review: Josh Duhamel and Katherine Heigl star in aggressively unlikeable 'Life As We Know It'

Greg Berlanti's parenthood comedy rings false from start to finish

"Life As We Know It" is Studio Filmmaking As We Fear It.

Mechanical, unpleasant, oblivious to the way actual people live, bright and slick and hollow, this is a by-the-numbers affair that manages to make two unlikeable phony genre devices into one unlikeable whole.  Josh Duhamel slouches his way though like he's embarrassed by everything going on around him, while Katherine Heigl once again embodies a particularly off-putting kind of modern shrew.  The two of them together don't add up to the wattage of one movie star, and they aren't able to transcend the material to make the film work simply as a pleasant sit.

The longer you read my work, the more you're realize that the thing that is most important to me in any film, no matter how outrageous the premise or how mainstream the supposed audience, the one thing that really matters to me is honesty.  I just want to see something that I recognize as real, whether it's the way characters relate to each other or the way someone responds to a situation or some bit of behavior or observation.  I don't need every film to be a documentary.  I love pure entertainment as much as the next person.  But when I see something that is just fake and dishonest and mechanical, it really does sit wrong with me.

Eric Messer (Duhamel) and Holly Berenson (Heigl) are best friends to Peter (Hayes MacArthur) and Alison (Christina Hendricks), and the first third of the film is a romantic comedy about two people, thrown together by common friends, who seem to hate each other at first but who are actually drawn to one another to such an obvious degree that you know the film will be about getting them together in the last ten minutes, with nothing but obstacles in the meantime.

Read Full Post
Neytiri and Jake

Neytiri and Jake together again

Credit: Fox

Watch: Even more unseen footage in 'Avatar Extended Collector’s Edition' trailer

3-disc set will include a new extended version of the film, hours of extras

The official trailer for the 3 disc Avatar Extended Collector’s Edition DVD (and blu-ray, of course) has been released and it will leave many an Avatar fan gagging with excitement, and I'm sure it's detractors simply gagging. I count myself as a fan and the new video has me stoked.

It has glimpses of the extra footage, yet unseen, from the "Collectors Extended Edition" of the film. This is not the  extended edition which came out in theaters, but a home-version-only cut that includes what appears to be an Earth-based 'civilian Jake' alternate opening.

The trailer also previews the extra features which will include a feature length documentary and 45 minutes of deleted scenes. Usually finding myself a defender of movies that are actually shot in 3D, it will be interesting to see how this animated film was made. Nothing against motion capture (of course) or even acting-capture, but the film is still a mostly animated which folks seem to forget, which is in a sense, a tribute to the filmmakers.

As a new owner of a Blu-Ray player (which admittedly plays video games too) I'm looking forward to this set, as it appears to contain lots more than the standard DVD, (menu's below) but I have to admit to a craving, very controllable at this point, for one of those ludicrously expensive 3D TV's…

Santa... I see you.

Read Full Post
<p>Oh, my.&nbsp; Someone help that kitty cat.&nbsp; Pepe Le Pew's got that look in his eye, that &quot;restraining orders be damned&quot;&nbsp;joie de vivre of his.</p>

Oh, my.  Someone help that kitty cat.  Pepe Le Pew's got that look in his eye, that "restraining orders be damned" joie de vivre of his.

Credit: Warner Bros.

Mike Myers, angry at his career, agrees to star in 'Pepe Le Pew'

Another family-oriented live-action/CG movie, but with a disturbing twist


It's come to this?

Look, I can accept that the wholesale strip-mining of the Looney Tunes characters is an inevitable thing.  They are owned by Warner Bros., a gigantic corporation with stockholders to appease and profits to earn, and these characters are part of an enduring legacy created by dozens and dozens of hard-working artists and filmmakers over the years.  They can be exploited and re-exploited forever, and will be.  I get that.

But just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do something.

When I was in Toronto for the film festival this year, I spent a good deal of time in line for the various press screenings, usually in the lobby of the Scotiabank Theater.  It's one of these hyper-modern lobbies with eight different concession booths and video games and monitors everywhere and neon purple accents and color and sound and light and it is a damn nightmare if you're trapped in it for longer than fifteen miinutes.

One of the particular forms of torture that the lobby is designed to visit upon you with the focused sadism of a trap in a "Saw" movie is that they only showed two trailers the entire time we were there, on a loop.  Over.  And over.  And over.  And over.  Two trailers.  I don't care if those trailers are for "Lawrence Of Arabia" and "Brazil," if you watch them hundreds of times in the course of a week, you will learn to cringe as if from physical blows each time each beat of those trailers plays out.  And what were they?  "You Again," which I will never ever see, and which appears to be about six minutes long, detailing each beat of the film.  And the other?

Read Full Post
<p>This was the theatrical poster for 'Scott Pilgrim Vs The World,' but you won't see this image on the cover of the US release on DVD&nbsp;and Blu-ray.</p>

This was the theatrical poster for 'Scott Pilgrim Vs The World,' but you won't see this image on the cover of the US release on DVD and Blu-ray.

Credit: Universal

'Scott Pilgrim' arrives on DVD and Blu-ray with a new cover... will it help?

Plus check out the cover Edgar Wright says you'll wish was real

I've been doing this a long time, and I can honestly say I've rarely seen a studio work harder to get a film in front of an audience than Universal did with "Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World."

I've also rarely seen a film land with the sort of box-office indifference in the face of generally glowing reactions that "Scott Pilgrim" did, and no matter how many conversations I've had with people about what happened, I haven't heard one good theory on why it failed to connect.  The film's tests all went well, people who saw it seemed to enjoy it, word of mouth was strong, reviews were great... and no one went.

I have a strong suspicion that "Pilgrim" is the sort of film that is going to build an audience slowly and surely on home video, and in a few years, people are going to wish they'd seen the film in the theater in the first place.  This is the best film to tank this hard since "The Iron Giant," and I knew in '99 that one would find its audience, too.

Part of the push on home video evidently involves a redesigned bit of key art, and today when Team HitFix got together for lunch, we were talking about whether or not this might work to encourage people to give the film a chance.  I'll say this... at least the new piece of key art puts the cast front and center.  I hate photoshop movie posters, and I miss the heyday of paintings as one-sheets, but this cover has more to do with the movie than the original poster image did... don't you think?

Read Full Post
<p>I'm guessing there's gonna be a whole lotta this in 'Transformers:&nbsp;The Dark Of The Moon,' which just got an official title today</p>

I'm guessing there's gonna be a whole lotta this in 'Transformers: The Dark Of The Moon,' which just got an official title today

Credit: Paramount Pictures

'Transformers 3' has a title... so does that mean it has a story, too?

The '60s space race plays a major part in the film, and the title seems to reflect that

It's strange the way information leaks out on films, and it's equally strange that even after a decade of certain types of leaks, studios haven't figured out how to put the kibosh on those leaks.

Case in point, the news today that the title for Paramount's upcoming mega-sequel is officially "Transformers: The Dark Of The Moon."  That's an odd configuration for the title, and I'm sure people will almost perpetually get it wrong and refer to the film as "The Dark Side Of The Moon," just because that's the automatic default when people think of that phrase.  It was revealed today because Amazon put up a listing so people could pre-order the movie tie-in books.  The information was first posted in a Transformers forum, and then got picked up by a few news sites before Frosty over at Collider verified the title with a source on the film.

I'm sure the title plays directly into the storyline of this third film in the series, which Michael Bay has stated repeatedly is the end of a trilogy.  If that's true, then that would indicate he's got plans that wrap up the admittedly loose continuity of the first two films.  It also suggests a stronger narrative focus this time out, because there's basically nothing in the second film that indicates that they're building on the first film or expanding any ideas or story themes.  Or, to be honest, that they even understand what story themes are.  What is obviously their goal with these films is building giant set pieces and showcasing as many robots as possible while Shia LaBeouf and an interchangeable hottie run around.  Which is fine... it's worked out well enough for them so far.

Read Full Post
<p>Simon Pegg and Andy Serkis are the stars of 'Burke&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;Hare,' the new dark comedy from John Landis, and now there's a trailer for the film.</p>

Simon Pegg and Andy Serkis are the stars of 'Burke & Hare,' the new dark comedy from John Landis, and now there's a trailer for the film.

Credit: Ealing Studios

The Morning Read: Raimi makes it official and 'Oz' is next

Plus the NC-17 turns 20 and 'Burke & Hare' gets a trailer

Welcome to The Morning Read.

It's raining in Los Angeles, I've already interviewed Jason Schwartzman today, and I've got "Grindhouse" on the Blu-ray player.  Sounds like it's time to see what's going on out there today.

You guys haven't had a chance to see "Rabbit Hole" yet, and I still haven't gotten around to reviewing it, so we haven't really begun singing the hosannahs for David Lindsay-Abaire here on the site yet.  We will.  And it looks like Sam Raimi's also in Lindsay-Abaire's fan club.  He had the writer working on "Spider-Man 4" for him before he dropped out of it, and now he's got him hard at work on "The Great And Powerful Oz," which Raimi is now officially set to direct for Disney in the spring.  Raimi appears to be the winner of the great "Oz" scramble of 2010, in which everyone in town simultaneously realized that Frank L. Baum's books are public domain, and if he really does secure Robert Downey Jr. as the Wizard, something that's not set in stone yet, then Disney might as well go ahead and break out the champagne, 'cause they can't lose.

Oh, my.

When I was in Austin for Fantastic Fest, I stayed with my friends Aaron and Kaela, and he's an avowed "Halo" addict who was firmly in the grips of "Halo: Reach" the entire time I was there.  That series has a hold on its fanbase that is truly impressive, so I'm not shocked to read that Hollywood is still sniffing around the game, trying to figure it out how to turn it into a film franchise of the same size.  I would, however, be shocked if all this talk of Spielberg adapting the spin-off novels actually amounted to anything more than a big fat game of "What if?".

Read Full Post
<p>Alex Ross certainly created some iconic images of Superman, and now the challenge Zack Snyder faces is finding a way to apply his own signature to what is arguably the most famous superhero of all time.</p>

Alex Ross certainly created some iconic images of Superman, and now the challenge Zack Snyder faces is finding a way to apply his own signature to what is arguably the most famous superhero of all time.

Credit: DC Comics/Alex Ross

What do we know about Zack Snyder's 'Superman' so far?

And more importantly, what do we want from it?

Yesterday's big movie news was the hiring of Zack Snyder to direct whatever Warner Bros. eventually calls their next Superman movie, and sure enough, people were quick to an opinion about whether or not that was good news.

I'm a fan, and I am amused by the people who get angry about Snyder as a choice.  Someone yesterday complained that the film is doomed now to be "an all-greenscreen movie," and that just makes me laugh.  Snyder did that once, with "300," and since then, the films he's been making have been shot on sets and locations.  Sure, he uses greenscreen for some things, but so do all filmmakers working in the big-ticket spectacle realm right now.  Does that commenter think someone's going to make a Superman film that somehow uses no greenscreen at all?  If so, I must admit that I'm curious what that would look like.  I'm guessing it would be a wee bit light on that whole flying thing.

But when Snyder's only done something one time out of a five film feature directing career, how is that the knee-jerk thing that you throw at him for the rest of his career?  One of the things that comic book panels do that is almost completely philosophically opposite from what movies do is that panels pick a particular moment, a beat, an image, and that's meant to represent the entire idea of what's going on.  I think Snyder's use of slow-motion is a really lovely way of doing the same thing in a film that a panel does in a comic book.  You're underlining something.  You're emphasizing this idealized image, this perfect beat.

All of this is just hypothetical, anyway, because we know so little about what sort of film Snyder's making and what sort of story is being told in the David Goyer script.  There are two important nuggets that have been dropped in the reporting on the film, though, potentially significant enough to mention.

Read Full Post