'Warrior' director Gavin O'Connor takes over on 'Jane Got a Gun'
But Jude Law is also out
Gavin O'Connor and Tom Hardy on the set of "Warrior."
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
UPDATE: As you may have heard by now, Jude Law -- himself a recent addition to the cast -- has now followed Ramsay to the exit, having signed on to work with her and not another director. After Michael Fassbender, he's the second major star to abandon the project in the last week. "Jane" may have a gun, but she can't catch a break.
PREVIOUSLY: Okay, so "Jane" is no longer a calamity. One day after gifted Scottish director Lynne Ramsay shockingly pulled out of Natalie Portman-starring Western "Jane Got a Gun" on the very first day of shooting, her replacement has already been drafted: Gavin O'Connor, the sturdy multi-hyphenate whose films include "Tumbleweeds," "Pride and Glory" and, most recently, "Warrior." With O'Connor on board, shooting will get under way tomorrow. No time to waste.
It's a smart choice, in my opinion. O'Connor is a solid, sensible craftsman who began in the independent realm and has since brought that sensibility to more mainstream projects. His 1999 breakthrough feature "Tumbleweeds," a mother-daughter dramedy which earned British actress Janet McTeer an Oscar nomination, remains an underseen gem, and while his studio-backed follow-ups "Miracle" and "Pride and Glory" lacked that film's spark and character, they were respectable, well-acted efforts.
It all came together two years ago on "Warrior," a muscular, moving sports drama with brilliant work from Tom Hardy and Joel Edgerton (plus an Oscar-nominated Nick Nolte) that didn't deserve its grim commercial fate. Financial disappointment notwithstanding, it was the kind of critically acclaimed, audience-friendly project that should have edged him up the pecking order for A-list projects: here's the first of them, though there are several others in the pipeline.
Granted, O'Connor isn't as singular or as sensuous a stylist as Ramsay -- though that, if anything, is an advantage when boarding a project that has until only a few days ago been another director's vision. Better still, he's a notably efficient filmmaker, and they'll certainly be glad of that, given the stressful start to the shoot. It'll be interesting to see O'Connor return to a female-led project so many years after "Tumbleweeds," especially given that his last few projects have been so testosterone-charged -- as such, directing Portman in a traditionally male-dominated genre plays to his strengths in multiple ways.
It's as happy an outcome as we could have hoped for to a potentially disastrous situation -- kudos to Scott Steindorff and his fellow producers (including Portman herself) for keeping it together.
I remain bitterly disappointed over Ramsay, whom I think is one of the most exciting filmmakers at work today, and for whom "Jane" represented a major opportunity. Hopefully, we'll hear her side of the story in due course. More hopefully still, this unfortunate situation won't ensure the wait for her next feature is as long (or longer) than the painful nine years that separated "Morvern Callar" and "We Need to Talk About Kevin." Perhaps she didn't have the temperament for this kind of production, though this story has prompted rather too much wild projection in the blogosphere for my liking.
Anyway, roll on "Jane" -- a project about which we remain hugely excited, and not just because it's written by former In Contention contributor Brian Duffield. If you missed the story yesterday, Kris has all the details.
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Patricia Highsmith adaptation marks the director's return to the big screenWednesday, May 22, 2013
-
'Behind the Candelabra' begins the long march through awards seasonWednesday, May 22, 2013
-
Come for the Gosling-Refn reunion, stay for the craft and Kristin Scott ThomasWednesday, May 22, 2013
-
What's good and what's bad directly from the PalaisWednesday, May 22, 2013





Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupDuncan Houst
March 20, 2013 at 11:14AM EST Reply to CommentTo play the optimist, I think it will be kind of fascinating to see how Ramsay's pre-production influence shows up in the film, and to what extent O'Connor's style mixes into a production already formed under a particular aesthetic mind. It won't be what it was, but that shouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. Also looking forward to whatever Lynne Ramsay does next, whenever that might be.
B
March 20, 2013 at 11:28AM EST Reply to CommentOh, I love Tumbleweeds! But this project seems to be a bit of a disaster...
DylanS
March 20, 2013 at 12:53PM EST Reply to CommentI was pondering the other day directors who would be good as a replacement, and O'Connor definitely came up. I think I was drawing upon directors who had worked with anybody in the cast before, and he got a great performance out of Edgerton in "Warrior". Solid choice I must say, and I'm still really looking forward to this one. I will always wonder what Ramsay's version would have looked like, but I'll see this because of Portman and the potential of the role alone.
bef and if it's still shot (after needing to replace Law now as well), he does have Darius Khondji, who no doubt, will try to stay true to his plans. I'm sure there's storyboards. I mean, there's pre-production for a reason.
March 20, 2013 at 2:05PM ESTDylanS Yes, I was glad to see that Khondji is involved, as he's probably my favorite cinematographer, based on his work on "Se7en" and the Januet/Caro films. And his last high profile gig was "Amour", which was such a colossal waste of his talent.
March 20, 2013 at 2:46PM ESTKate
March 20, 2013 at 1:22PM EST Reply to CommentWhat a clusterfuck. Jude Law just dropped out because Ramsay left.
bef Portman should just put a call out to all the Malick Men who dropped by set on a whim: Benicio Del Toro, Wes Bentley, Ryan Gosling, Michael Fassbend... oh. Well, Val Kilmer will show up for anything day of, and he lives in New Mexico!
March 20, 2013 at 1:54PM ESTMatthew Starr "Val Kilmer will show up for anything day of"
March 20, 2013 at 2:00PM ESTlol
Matthew Starr Also Jude has worked with Natalie a few times already (Closer, Cold Mountain). Isn't it kind of odd he would just ditch the production like that? This has to leave a sour taste in Natalie's mouth in terms of her working relationship with Jude.
March 20, 2013 at 2:07PM ESTDefRef Jude Law only hopped in because Michael Fassbender dropped out and to work with Ramsay. With Ramsay gone, his reason for being there went with it. It'd be like signing onto a movie because [insert name of prominent die-to-work-with director] was attached and then having him bail and Brett Ratner (oooooh, burn!) coming in to take over. Are you going to stay? Exactly.
March 20, 2013 at 6:19PM ESTMatthew Starr Yeah but after the all the film has gone through Jude is now forcing them to find a substitute actor after just having to find a sub director in 24 hours. In fact I am still wondering how they signed a director so quickly. It seems like they already knew for days there might be problem and we're talking to other directors. One day we will find out what went down.
March 20, 2013 at 8:44PM ESTLaura Stewart
March 20, 2013 at 2:37PM EST Reply to CommentSomeone commented at Deadline or one of the other sites that Patty Jenkins would have been a perfect fit and I couldn't agree more. Especially given the Portman/Jenkins connection. But I remain hugely excited for this film and Gavin is a terrific director. Sucks that Law is out- this represented a great opportunity for him especially opposite Edgerton. Kind of wish it had been Portman... still don't see her as hugely talented or versatile. Maybe Chastain (duh), Adams, Michelle Williams, or my personal oddball choice- Felicity Jones?
Sam I also have to agree. Movie sounds interesting conceptually but I've always thought Portman was not a very good access. Maybe not bad, but very acting by numbers.
March 20, 2013 at 4:48PM ESTDefRef Portman used to be very good - think Leon, her first movie made at age 12 - and was quite the prodigy, but as she got older and sucked up a storm in the Star Wars prequels, she's gotten stiffer and more mannered. It's like she's stiffening up as she ages instead of getting more relaxed.
March 20, 2013 at 6:17PM ESTMatthew Starr Portman is a producer on the film so there is no way she backs out. She can be quite good in the right hands (Leon, Closer, Black Swan). I even liked her in V for Vendetta. Who isn't terrible in the Star Wars movies?
March 20, 2013 at 8:47PM ESTDefRef I found her to be one-note in Black Swan, like a human headache. She was good, but it was a narrow performance.
March 20, 2013 at 8:59PM ESTEwan McGregor was good in the Star Wars movies.
Ridley I only thought she was good in Leon. I found her incredibly stilted in Black Swan and Closer. haven't seen V for Vendetta.
March 20, 2013 at 9:38PM ESTLaura Stewart Matthew- She has her moments, but I find her playing the same character over and over. She doesn't strike me as a versatile actress.
March 22, 2013 at 2:46PM ESTFranklynStreet
March 20, 2013 at 2:58PM EST Reply to CommentWasn't a huge fan of Kevin-- thought the film version had more than its share of problem. Still good, but not great and very overrated. Patty Jenkins was the choice I think everyone was expecting here, but I like O'Connor a lot and am curious to see what he'll do with this. Hopefully he loves the material and can make it work with the development and pre-production that's already been done without him.
Andrej
March 20, 2013 at 11:13PM EST Reply to CommentI just hope this whole drama is worth the movie they're working on. It'd suck if by the time the movie comes around they kept bringing it up if only because the movie by itself wasn't as interesting as these news.
msd
March 21, 2013 at 8:22AM EST Reply to CommentA new director in 24 hours .. isn't that suspiciously fast?
RichardZ
March 21, 2013 at 8:56AM EST Reply to CommentIt's the lure and curse of Santa Fe, NM. You'd wanna work there but once you get there, you wouldn't wanna work. I'd hike, eat, spa, and ponder.
yo
March 21, 2013 at 11:40AM EST Reply to CommentIs Gavin O'Connor the reason for Jude Law departing the picture? Years back, Jude and Hillary Swank were lined up for a Gavin O'Connor movie called "Dexterity," a lit adaptation I think, that never came through obviously. Just wondering.
immature
March 21, 2013 at 2:11PM EST Reply to CommentAny word on who's replacing Law?