Tom Hooper unveils 'Les Misérables' to over-the-moon, theater-loving NYC audience
The crowd of guild and Academy members (and press) ate it up with a spoon
Hugh Jackman performs "What Have I Done?" in "Les Misérables," one of many moments that brought a round of applause in this afternoon's screening.
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
NEW YORK -- "Happy Thanksgiving," director Tom Hooper said by way of introduction to an Alice Tully Hall packed with guild and Academy members this afternoon. He was on hand to present his latest film, an adaptation of the musical "Les Misérables," his first effort since the Oscar-winning "The King's Speech" two years ago and one of the awards season's most anticipated titles.
The film had screened for Screen Actors Guild Nominating Committee members earlier in the morning, but Hooper nevertheless made the crowd feel special with a little white lie. "In case you feel you're slow to the party, you are the first audience to see the film," he said. "We finished it at 2am yesterday."
Being that it's Thanksgiving week, Hooper -- a Brit who noted that he went to his first Thanksgiving dinner last night and "learned the ritual of saying what we're thankful and grateful for" -- said he was mostly grateful to have finished in time for today. The pressure is on in the shortened phase one window for studios to get their contenders out there ASAP, and indeed, Hooper will be on his way to Los Angeles soon enough to do the very same song and dance tomorrow. But he said he was pleased to be able to treat the New York scene first.
"It's great to show the film at the Lincoln Center, which is really the home of the human voice at its best and most wonderful," he said. "We're sitting underneath Julliard. Next door we have great temples to the human voice, and it's great to be presenting this live-sung musical in this wonderful venue."
That point about live singing would be a big one during the post-screening Q&A, which featured Hooper and stars Anne Hathaway, Amanda Seyfried, Samantha Barks and Eddie Redmayne. Universal Pictures has already produced and proliferated a featurette playing up the virtues of the practice, which is indeed unique to the genre. But while it presented clear challenges, Hooper said he felt it was the only way to go.
Related
-
Watch: 'Les Miserables' sets itself apart by singing live on set
Awards contender makes its pitch
"I wanted to see what I could learn from the masters doing the musicals, and I always thought there was some tiny amount of distance I was experiencing between me and the form," he said. "I felt in the end that there was a falsity…I think of it as emotional. There can't be any distance between you and the person expressing emotions through song…Most importantly, for me, acting is all about pure language in the present tense. To act is to create the illusion that these songs, these speeches are produced by the character in the heat of the moment. This gave the actors the freedom to control tempo, maybe to take a tiny fraction of a second to alter an emotion or express it."
Hooper first came to the project because he had been working some time back with screenwriter William Nicholson on something else entirely. This was before the big ride that was "The King's Speech." Nicholson got the call to adapt "Les Misérables" for the screen, and Hooper's first thought was shock that the musical -- which first hit the stage on London's West End in 1985 -- hadn't been translated to film yet. His second thought was equal shock that he had never seen the theater show himself.
So he went to see the show in August of 2010, a month before "The King's Speech" bowed at the Telluride Film Festival. And the emotions of the piece really spoke to him.
"There's a moment at the very end of the film where Valjean is walking out towards the bishop and you hear the ghostly chorus of the people's song coming in," he said. "When that moment hit, I felt stunned. I had the most extraordinary physical sensation and I wondered if I could create that same physical power on film."
He then started the long journey of exploring the material, which led to a reading of the original Victor Hugo novel, which he had never read. "In England I suppose we read Dickens more than we read Hugo," he quipped. "But it's a masterpiece. And I began to see things in the novel that excited me for the film. There's a brilliant moment when Valjean meets Cosette and Victor Hugo writes, 'This was the second white apparition Valjean had encountered. The Bishop taught him virtue. Cosette taught him the meaning of love.' I began to think there was this story of twin epiphanies, of the discovery of spirituality and compassion and the transformative power of love."
That's also, interestingly enough, what led him to collaborate with the show's original songwriting team of Claude-Michel Schönberg, Alain Boubil and Herbert Kretzmer on the one trackign completely unique to the film: "Suddenly."
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Oscar Isaac is a revelation in melancholy study of arrested artistrySunday, May 19, 2013
-
Putting a bow on last year's awards season with a few laughsSunday, May 19, 2013
-
How has the franchise fared at the Academy Awards over the decades?Saturday, May 18, 2013
-
Competition's first outright dud is a major letdown from Arnaud DesplechinSaturday, May 18, 2013






Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupHoustonRufus
November 23, 2012 at 9:12PM EST Reply to CommentKris, from your twitter reaction (and others), it sounds like the film is indeed the "contender" it has been pegged to be. Is that fair?
Kristopher Tapley A contender? Across the board.
November 23, 2012 at 9:19PM ESTHoustonRufus Wow, great to hear. I've been rooting for the film. I really didn't want to be disappointed by another adaptation of a stage musical.
November 23, 2012 at 9:24PM ESTpitypie
November 23, 2012 at 9:29PM EST Reply to CommentJust out of curiosity, is it sung-through like the stage version?
Kristopher Tapley Completely. Maybe a line here, a phrase there spoken -- but pretty much sung-through entirely.
November 23, 2012 at 9:31PM ESTChris138 I've never seen the stage version, but this is going to be a tough sit for me if it's two and a half hours of non-stop singing. I'll definitely see it and hope to enjoy it, but I have to admit that musicals are not up there as one of my favorite genres. I can name about a hand full that I truly like.
November 24, 2012 at 1:52AM ESTKristopher Tapley I went in with the same attitude, FYI.
November 24, 2012 at 1:57AM ESTpitypie Yeah, the reason I asked was because, even though it's my favourite musical, it's a long sit, and that's with an intermission, which I'm guess the film doesn't have...
November 24, 2012 at 3:34PM ESTJoseph
November 23, 2012 at 9:32PM EST Reply to CommentHasn't there ever been an Oscar acting nominee or winner that differed from the source material?
Anne Hathaway's role (Fantine) isn't even a Tony nominated role. Barks' role (Eponine - the Tony winner) and Seyfried's role (Cosette) were.
Joseph
November 23, 2012 at 9:32PM EST Reply to CommentHasn't there ever been an Oscar acting nominee or winner that differed from the source material?
Anne Hathaway's role (Fantine) isn't even a Tony nominated role. Barks' role (Eponine - the Tony winner) and Seyfried's role (Cosette) were.
HoustonRufus Maybe I'm dense, but I'm not sure I understand your question?
November 23, 2012 at 9:39PM ESTA.J He's saying in the past the Oscar nominated roles were also the Tony nominated roles from the musical. For example Renee Zelwigger, Catherine Zeta-Jones, and Queen Latifah were nominated for Oscars and Chita Rivera, Gwen Verdon, and Marcia Lewis were nominated for Tony awards for the same roles (although Rivera and Verdon for the original production and Lewis for the revival). Same for Hudson and Holliday has Effie White. Has there been an Oscar nominated musical role that wasn't previously nominated for the Tony? I don't know.
November 23, 2012 at 11:02PM ESTHoustonRufus Ok. Thanks! Don't know the answer, but it's an interesting question.
November 23, 2012 at 11:06PM ESTJohn G. John C. Reilly in Chicago?
November 23, 2012 at 11:10PM ESTCaptainCanada Both Anita and Bernardo in "West Side Story"; the only acting nomination for the original production was for the actress playing Maria, amusingly enough, since Natalie Wood wasn't nominated.
November 24, 2012 at 1:13AM ESTThough in the case of the Anita role, the two Broadway revivals after the movies were made resulted in a nomination for Debbie Allen and a win for Karen Olivo.
GlennAU It seems silly, but "I Dreamed a Dream" is a bit of a pop culture moment now. Certainly more to the extent than it was five years ago. We all know why, but seems silly to deny it.
November 25, 2012 at 6:05AM ESTJT M.
November 23, 2012 at 9:36PM EST Reply to CommentPart of me is so thrilled to see SO many great films in contention this year. Such a stark departure from last years lackluster lineup. However, I just can't imagine Hathaway on stage over someone like Adams (who should have won for The Fighter and who I believe gives a career best perf in The Master). I do think Anne has had a great year between TDKR and Les Miz, but good god her "acting" in THR's roundtable made it really hard to root for her. Yes, I'm being catty but I'm not sure I want to believe Hollywood is above that.
HoustonRufus I just don't get this "catty" thing people have against Hathaway. I guess I have celebs and actors who rub me wrong, but hear this kind of thing about Hathaway so often. And yet she seems perfectly lovely in every way. To me, at least.
November 23, 2012 at 9:43PM ESTJJ1 I agree, houston
November 23, 2012 at 10:10PM ESTMatt I like Hathaway quite a bit, and I thought her perf in TDKR was the best of that movie probably. But I understand people's complaints. I think there's aspects of her performance where it just looks like she's trying. You can tell she's acting, and for me, the best acting, or at least my favourite acting, is when it looks effortless. It looks like they are those people. They may have lots of affected mannerisms they've adopted for the role, but you can't tell - it's part of the magic trick. Whereas, there are moments, often, where Hathaway seems affected, like she's trying. I think it stems from a theatre-based mindset of acting versus a film, and it's just natural for her to be so big, that even when she's small or pulled back, it can seem affected. She's just always seemed more theatre than film. But that might be why Catwoman worked so well for her because that character's whole bit is about performance. But I think she's starting to move past that as an actress. Hope that made sense.
November 23, 2012 at 10:21PM ESTLevi I agree with Houston; she appears lovely to me as well as gracious, modest and unpretentious. Personally, I thought she should have won for her performance in Rachel Getting Married. But, like others, musicals turned into movies generally leave me feeling indifferent. Nothing has amused me much since Cabaret and/or Hedwig and the Angry Inch. However, I will keep an open mind.
November 25, 2012 at 2:52AM ESTLevi Actually, I just remembered how much I loved Christophe Honoré's, Les chansons d'amour. But it's originality and newness is what won me over. Les Misérables just feels so old hat to me, though I am ready to be won over (should it do so).
November 25, 2012 at 3:27AM ESTHoustonRufus
November 23, 2012 at 9:38PM EST Reply to CommentSo do you see some surprise acting nominations expanding beyond the typically discussed ones for Hathaway and Jackman?
Kristopher Tapley In my opinion, Hathaway, Barks, Seyfried, Carter, Crowe, Redmayne and Cohen all deserve to be on the supporting longlists.
November 23, 2012 at 9:52PM ESTHoustonRufus Thanks, Kris. Sounds like the cast hit the bullseye. Happy for them all.
November 23, 2012 at 10:01PM ESTJohn G. Sounds like this could this be our SAG ensemble winner?
November 23, 2012 at 10:02PM ESTKristopher Tapley Great year for ensembles.
November 23, 2012 at 10:05PM ESTHoustonRufus I'm a big fan of Lincoln's cast, so I feel like my heart is going to be divided. Not to mention we have Argo and others. But I shouldn't really complain about having such a competitive year.
November 23, 2012 at 10:06PM ESTJJ1 Having just seen Lincoln, I can't imagine another film to win the SAG.
November 23, 2012 at 10:12PM ESTBut I am thrilled to hear this good buzz for Les Miserables :)
JJ1 So excited about the Oscar race this year
November 23, 2012 at 10:12PM ESTHoustonRufus Yeah, JJ1, it does feel like a very strong year. Interested to hear more of your thoughts on Lincoln when you are ready to share them.
November 23, 2012 at 10:18PM ESTJJ1 I thought Lincoln was excellent. I was really taken aback (although I don't know why I thought otherwise) by how strong the ensemble was. It's one of those situations where if the roles were bigger for Strathairn, Spader, Holbrook, JGL, and Gloria Reuben then I would have thought they'd be sure thing nominees ... they're that good!
November 23, 2012 at 10:30PM ESTI thought the writing was wonderful, as well. Some of the political talk early on (with quick, overlapping dialogue) confused me a bit. But after that, it was smooth sailing. And I also thought the script was quite funny (which I heard to be the case, anyway).
Craftswise, the cinematography, art direction, and costumes are all superb. I find myself slightly less enthusiastic about the editing, makeup, sound, and score ... But they're all good, too -- very surprised by John Williams' restraint.
Overall, a solid A- for me (maybe that would go up in other viewings). My packed theater was made up of a primarily 50 and up crowd. And there was much applause at the end of the movie.
It's funny how quick things can change. Argo is still strong, but after seeing Lincoln, I can't help but feel like it deserves front runner status. And then .... Les Miserables is seen and looks to be very strong, too! Love the races this year.
JJ1 Oh, duh. I also thought Sally Field was nom-worthy, and I wouldn't be upset at all If DDL wins.
November 23, 2012 at 10:32PM ESTHoustonRufus I was very impressed with Lincoln for all the reasons you mention. Glad you enjoyed it.
November 23, 2012 at 10:43PM ESTAs an anecdote, my family went to see Lincoln last night after Thanksgiving dinner. This means nothing, but they loved it. I love my family, but I was surprised they were so taken with it. I gathered they were expecting a more sweeping biopic of Lincoln, the whole birth to death kind of thing. But no complaints and they had nothing but praise. I've been surprised at the mainstream embrace of Lincoln. I guess I just thought it might be too chatty or focused on back room politics to hold their attention. But the film seems to appeal to wide swath.
JJ1 I completely agree, Houston. I am pleasantly surprised by the mainstream reactions.
November 23, 2012 at 10:45PM ESTDylanS If I may chime in on the "Lincoln" praise, having seen the film wednesday night, I was blown away by the film. I expected typically good Spielberg, but the film is phenomenal and is quite possibly my favorite of the year. I've often been less enthusiastic about Day-Lewis' previous performances, as even when I like the performance ("There Will Be Blood", for example), I find myself irritated by how self consciously mannered and over-the-top he can be. Having said that, he is superb in the film, effortlessly sliding into a persona we are all familiar with and really fleshing him out as a human being. There was a warmth here uncharacteristic of Day Lewis' previous work. Despite having already won 2 Oscars, I think it would be an injustice if Day-Lewis didn't win the Oscar for this career best performance.
November 24, 2012 at 2:40PM ESTThe ensemble is outstanding, and TLJ is a good as everybody said in the best scene stealing role (with Spader a solid second). But I thought David Straithairn did impeccable yet restrained work as William Seward, and the he was a wonderful anchor to Lincoln. Amazing film.
James
November 23, 2012 at 10:15PM EST Reply to CommentYou think critics will go for it Kris? Maybe its just me, but I sense a lot of hate for Hooper out there. At least among the younger folks.
HoustonRufus This is my one concern for Les Mis. But as an industry outsider, I have no real sense for how big a handicap the antiHooper sentiment is.
November 23, 2012 at 10:47PM ESTKristopher Tapley I don't think it will be hailed or anything (I can never read those guys, though). Maybe not even as acclaimed as The King's Speech (since that was such a discovery along the festival circuit).
November 23, 2012 at 11:22PM ESTsosgemini Enough hate to overcome the old white male electoral advantage and the fact that he just won (and must be liked enough to do so?
November 23, 2012 at 11:44PM ESTred_wine Let's not kid ourselves. I know this horrible myth started percolating when everyone's boner The Social Network lost the season but The King's Speech is an enormously acclaimed picture. 88 on Metacritic and 96% on RT is nothing to sneeze at. The reviews were very good across the board. So there was no hate for it amongst the critics, infact quite the opposite. Even amongst the highest brow critics awards - LA, NY, NSFC, the film either won or was the runner-up in Screenplay, Actor and Supporting Actor.
November 24, 2012 at 3:45AM ESTPeople color hindsight to suit their purposes.
JJ1 Preach, red_wine. I while I really loved both The Kings Speech and The Social Network, I never liked the anti-Hooper, anti-TKS stuff because it received as much acclaim as it did (i.e., the 88, 96 that red_wine mentioned).
November 24, 2012 at 9:00AM ESTI'd somewhat understand if it was a Crash situation (so-so/good reviews). And yet, I liked Crash, too. So.
Edwin As others have pointed out, I don't think many critics hate Tom Hooper. That's really more of an internet thing, from what I gather. It's just people who still resent the fact that he won Best Director over David Fincher, so they exaggerate their disappointment by finding ways to claim that he's a flat-out bad director (which he's certainly not). And these internet Fincher fanboys are just going to have to start accepting that Tom Hooper is definitely in the running for a second win, if these early reactions are any indication.
November 24, 2012 at 12:40PM ESTI do think it's very possible that "Les Miz" will be more beloved by the industry than the critics, but that doesn't mean it will be resented by critics in any way. It probably won't be the single most critically acclaimed film of the year, but it will definitely end up on its fair share of top 10 lists, I'm sure.
goodvibe61
November 23, 2012 at 10:28PM EST Reply to CommentHere we go yet again with another musical the academy can swoon over.
Every year we get this, and it can get pretty unendurable. Helena Bonham Carter can barely warble her way through a tune, so of course she gets nominated for the Academy Award for Sweeney Todd. The media is "shocked" when Richard Gere doesn't get nominated for Chicago, in which he gives his most "competent" performance. I'm sure we'll all find out next month what a stunning vocalist Amanda Seyfried is.
It will be fascinating to see which audiences in the country outside of NYC and Los Angeles give each song an ovation in the theater.
And of course it's Tom Hooper at the helm. Completely figures. The lightweight highly agreeable King's Speech brought down the masterful and far greater Social Network; who else to bring this to the table to knock off Lincoln, or anything else that shows up that's not off the beaten path?
Yippee.
John G. let it go
November 23, 2012 at 10:41PM ESTA.J The Academy swoons over musicals?
November 23, 2012 at 11:03PM ESTRobert A. Reply to comment...
November 23, 2012 at 11:04PM ESTRobert A. Helena Bonham Carter was not nominated for an Academy Award for Sweeney Todd.
November 23, 2012 at 11:05PM ESTanonymous Or it could be a good movie
November 24, 2012 at 12:32AM ESTjack_is_laughing The Academy doesn't swoon over musicals. Chicago is the only BP winner in the last 40 years. This one will likely be nominated, but it's going to have some stiff competition and Harvey Weinstein didn't produce Les Mis, which is automatically a strike against it. However, this film has had the best marketing campaign of any nominee and there isn't any other major contender right now that will compete directly for the Oscar voters that this film will easily win over. It's chances are really good, but let's not start making proclamations just yet: It is still only November.
November 24, 2012 at 3:45AM ESTKristopher Tapley "...but it's going to have some stiff competition and Harvey Weinstein didn't produce Les Mis, which is automatically a strike against it."
November 24, 2012 at 12:05PM ESTOkay, first and foremost, that statement is ridiculous on its face. The absence of someone from a credit roll is not a "strike" against something.
Second, the producers of "Les Miserables" -- Working Title Films -- aren't exactly rubbish.
Finally, the Oscar marketing team behind "Les Mis" is also top notch.
The blurring of the lines on this stuff is getting worse, statements tossed around with abandon. I realize they only reflect a lack of education on this or that matter but it starts to bother me after a while.
Meanwhile, I kind of thought GoodVibe61's clearly inaccurate ramblings were self-evidently off-base, so no need to keep addressing them.
jack_is_laughing That comment about Harvey was intentionally sarcastic, but Harvey has proven himself time and time again to be a formidable opponent when it comes to playing the horse race that is Oscar. If you don't believe me, tally up the producers with BP wins over the last 20 years. Then look at how many Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor/Actress winners Working Title has produced. Harvey wins that competition and it doesn't necessarily imply he makes better films. Working Title is a great British production company and they make excellent films, but winning Oscars is as much a marketing game as it is endorsement of creative achievement.
November 24, 2012 at 12:30PM ESTFor better or worse, Harvey excels at producing winners, especially in the Best Picture race. The evidence is right there in the storied list of winners. I think this year is going to work against Harvey due to the accelerated nomination schedule and Les Miz is a very strong contender, but don't ever count Harvey out.
Kristopher Tapley Well, I don't think I need to be lectured on the Oscar-campaigning prowess of Harvey Weinstein. Well aware. I was simply disputing the notion that his absence from a film HURTS it. It's a strange thing to contend.
November 24, 2012 at 12:47PM ESTOh, and the marketing team behind "Les Mis?" They have a good track record, one you won't necessarily find trawling through IMDb. That would be Angellotti/Universal. Working Title are the producers, which I only brought up because for some reason you are equating "distribute" to "produce."
So on that, Weinstein didn't necessarily "produce" a number of his big players. Just look at the one he picked up at Cannes last year and took all the way. An acquisition.
So I don't dispute Weinstein's prowess in the slightest when he has a contender. This year, I don't know that he has a legitimate one, though he does have some good films to play with.
jack_is_laughing I'm not trying to lecture you, just defending my "ridiculous" comment, as you characterized it. This is going to be an interesting year for the Oscars for a number of reasons, and I've had my money on Les Miz for a while but I'm not counting anyone out right now. Lincoln is quietly building buzz. Silver Linings Playbook appears to be the flavor of the week but we'll see if that has legs. And while it feels like a long shot, I'm waiting to hear the early reaction to Zero Dark Thirty. All of the experts are still picking Argo too, so we'll see.
November 24, 2012 at 1:05PM ESTKristopher Tapley Well, fair enough. You said it was sarcasm so okay.
November 24, 2012 at 1:11PM ESTI think the momentum swung toward Lincoln last week. But it'll swing again after more see Les Mis.
Tom I really wish musicals were as popular and beloved by the Academy as you claim. After all, they're pretty much the best movie genre (or at least in the top three.)
November 26, 2012 at 5:12PM ESTPretending that we've had some sort of flood of them recently is kind of absurd.
Tom ^ If it wasn't clear, the above comment was a direct response to Goodvibe and this comment: "Here we go yet again with another musical the academy can swoon over."
November 26, 2012 at 5:14PM ESTAs if the multiplexes were overflowing with musicals and two or three of them got nominated every year.
goodvibe61 OK. I'm dreadfully off base.
November 27, 2012 at 4:07PM ESTLet me put it this way. It seems to me that just about every time a significant (Big Budget with film actors the public generally knows) musical gets made the Oscar buzz becomes huge.
Off the top of my head, and I'm sure you'll all tell me how wrong I am again:
1996: Evita: It's all you heard about, and Madonna got a GG nom, and the talk of it being in the chase was endless.
2001: Moulin Rouge: An endless parade of praise for some reason.
2002: Chicago: Everyone hated this, right?
2004: Phantom of the Opera: The build up for this was ridiculous.
2006: Dreamgirls: This put my beloved Zodiac on awards ice, and turned Zodiac into a winter dump.
2007: Sweeney Todd: No, this certainly received little build up regarding awards
2009: Nine: Off the charts Awards Fodder, until people actually saw it.
2012: Les Miz.
Put it this way: every time a film like this is going to be released, the hype machine is HUGE.
renton
November 23, 2012 at 11:21PM EST Reply to CommentIf it's that serious of an Oscar contender, it's only a matter of time before Harvey whispers something to Matt Drudge about the how movie glosses over Jean Valjean's secret past as a bread thief.
Zack Drudge will lose all interest in the movie when he realizes the rioting crowds in it are entirely white.
November 24, 2012 at 1:37AM ESTAmericanRequiem
November 23, 2012 at 11:28PM EST Reply to CommentOh my how exciting, it is the year of the epics indeed. I don't see how Argo can withstand Lincoln and now Les Mis. Lincoln is an amzing movie that has gotten people talking and aplauding after every screening, it will be a fight to the death for the best picture win.
Also hoping Alan Arkins totally average work in Argo gets pushed out when there are lesser known more deserving performances( Beasts of End of Watch for example)
Murtada
November 23, 2012 at 11:37PM EST Reply to CommentKris - hat about Jackman? Will he give DDL heat?
AmericanRequiem
November 24, 2012 at 12:01AM EST Reply to CommentKris wil you explain your comment about visual effects? Very intriguing
Kristopher Tapley The film uses a lot of effects to transition and expand environments. It's overt in an interesting way.
November 24, 2012 at 12:24AM ESTCaptainCanada
November 24, 2012 at 1:15AM EST Reply to CommentI'm glad to hear this seems to have worked out. I'm really excited to see how this. I'll be spending the holidays in my mother's hometown at a family gathering, so perhaps it'll be a family excursion.
I'm a fan of Amanda Seyfried, who's not had much to work with in terms of roles in the last few years, so it's nice to see her land a role in a real success.
Brock Landers
November 24, 2012 at 1:20AM EST Reply to CommentIs it as terribly claustrophobic as the trailers indicate?
Kristopher Tapley Didn't bother me as much on the big screen.
November 24, 2012 at 1:58AM ESTElle
November 24, 2012 at 2:26AM EST Reply to CommentKris, what did you think of the new song, "suddenly"? Was it up to the standards of the other songs, or was it just ok?
Bradley While he's undeniably talented, it astounds me that Tom Hooper can survive these campaigns without his reputation within the UK industry being exposed. Vile.
November 24, 2012 at 7:27AM ESTKristopher Tapley Publicists work hard, Bradley.
November 24, 2012 at 12:06PM ESTJohn G. What is his reputation within the UK industry?
November 24, 2012 at 2:42PM ESTflynn
November 24, 2012 at 8:38AM EST Reply to CommentMatt, haters are always going to hate. People are always going to find ways to trash people, especially people that are very talented. Anne Hathaway is that rare triple threat talent. So, I am not surprised that people are finding ways to badmouth her talents. Bette Midler ( she is very theatrical in all her performances) Kevin Spacey, Hugh Jackman, Daniel Day-Lewis ( very theatrical in There Will Be Blood, My Left Foot, and Gangs of NY) , Al Pacino ( very theatrical in Scent of A Woman & Dick Tracy) , Meryl Streep, Shirley MacLaine ( very theatrical in Terms of Endearment & Steal Magnolias ) , are some of the movie stars that bring a big theatricality to their film performances. I don't hear people complaining about these film stars bringing strong theatre skills to their film performances. Hathaway proved with Rachel Getting Married, The Devil Wears Prada, and TDKR, that she can bring subtlety to her movie performances.
JJ1 Very well said
November 24, 2012 at 9:02AM ESTloyal_mehnert
November 24, 2012 at 7:10PM EST Reply to CommentLincoln will likely become Spielberg's highest grossing non-blockbuster film and could actually flirt with 200 million. It has to be considered the strong frontrunner for PGA, DGA, and SAG wins.
Les Miz needs more than an impressive NYC unveiling to stop that train
AmericanRequiem I LOVE LINCOLN. But I'm having trouble seeing how it could hit 200 mil?
November 24, 2012 at 10:39PM ESTKristopher Tapley Well, it got an impressive LA unveiling today. So it's on its way.
November 25, 2012 at 12:08AM ESTAmericanRequiem You think Lincoln can crack 200 mil Kris?
November 25, 2012 at 12:19AM ESTAmericanRequiem Ah nevermind, I see what you meant
November 25, 2012 at 12:21AM ESTRiley Two mid-20 million weekends usually doesn't equal 200 million total.
November 25, 2012 at 1:35AM EST
At this point Lincoln's trajectory is the 150m range, barring some sort of national cataclysm that shuts down cinemas nationwide.
November 25, 2012 at 6:40AM ESTAs WOM increases throughout the month of December, coupled with award attention, its forecast only gets rosier. Lincoln stands a good chance of taking the #1 spot from Twilight/Skyfall either Nov 30th-Dec 2nd or Dec 7th-9th.
So yes, it "could" flirt with 200m. Lincoln's theatrical run is beginning to mirror The Blind Side but on far fewer screens (I suspect they will add 500+ next weekend to insure the "#1 film in America ad.")
Lincoln is certainly Spielberg's best box office story since Saving Private Ryan, which I suspect will garner lots of respect from AMPAS voters, especially considering the subject matter.
prettok "Highest grossing non-blockbuster"? What does that mean? If Lincoln makes 200 million, doesn't that make it a blockbuster by definition?
November 25, 2012 at 6:19PM EST
By definition? No.
November 25, 2012 at 7:37PM ESTThere's a difference between War of the Worlds making 200m and Lincoln making 200m.
Lincoln's run is similar to The Help and The Blind Side, its a combination of timing, source material, marketing, talent, and well, pure luck.
The fact that Lincoln will outgross War Horse and Tintin combined is simply astonishing.
Kathy
November 24, 2012 at 9:28PM EST Reply to CommentOur family saw Lincoln last night to a packed and very enthusiastic audience in Illinois. Audience ranged from youngsters to oldsters. Applause at end of film. Daniel Day-Lewis made me cry.
Christophe
November 28, 2012 at 2:37PM EST Reply to CommentThe Les Misérables – Lincoln connection
Did you know soldiers on both sides were reading Les Misérables during the Civil War? Apparently, Confederate soldiers, disgruntled by the dire living conditions under General Lee’s command, even called themselves “Lee’s Miserables”. They went on to desert in droves which led to the end of the war.
Sources:
http://gavroche.org/vhugo/leesmiserables.shtml
and
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/3670785/Under-the-covers.html
What a beautiful nod to history it would be if Lincoln and Les Misérables were to sweep the Oscars together!