Tech Support: Visual Effects Society issues a 'call to action'
Executive director Eric Roth sends out a determined open letter
A placard held by a visual effects community protester at the Oscars on Sunday
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
If you've paid any attention to the film industry the last few weeks, or maybe at least noticed green icons all over Facebook and Twitter, you're well aware of the on-going state of frustration within the visual effects community. HitFix's Drew McWeeny laid out a very compelling and considered piece this week examining why the industry playing chicken with these guys is a bad, bad idea, and the reportage on the "fragile underpinnings" of all of this really stems back to a David Cohen piece in Variety two weeks ago. In so many words, we're approaching a watershed moment.
With that in mind, Visual Effects Society Executive Director Eric Roth has issued an open letter and a "call to action," imploring government and, certainly, industry attention be paid to this post-production sector. "The amazing irony," he writes, "is that while 47 of the top 50 films of all time are visual effects driven and billions of dollars of profits are generated yearly, the actual people who create the work are becoming an endangered species in California."
Read the letter in its entirety below.
VES Open Letter – Call To Action
In light of current events, the Visual Effects Society (VES), an honorary body comprised of the very best visual effects artists around the world, today issues two calls to action:
First, we call upon Governor Brown and the State Legislature to immediately expand its tax incentive program for the entertainment industry and to include a focused approach concentrated on the visual effects and post production sectors of the industry.
Secondly, because we have reached a tipping point for the visual effects industry and there is much pent up energy, anger and frustration right now, the VES, under its good offices, is organizing a VFX Congress to take place within the next few weeks to allow all artists from around the world to share their concerns to find common ground on the issues that face us today. It is hoped that this effort will lead to a number of direct follow up actions that will gain consensus from visual effects artists everywhere. Everyone is invited and should attend.
As has become all too apparent over the past few years, and especially in the past few weeks regarding the status of Rhythm & Hues, Digital Domain, DreamWorks, and other visual effects facilities, the future for professionals who work in the visual effects industry – and the entertainment industry at large – in California is in serious jeopardy.
Related
-
The visual effects community sees red in the wake of Oscar protest and on-air snub
Is Hollywood paying attention? Because real trouble is on the horizon
-
3D CGI spectacle 'Life of Pi' wins Oscars for Best Cinematography and Best Visual Effects
Director Ang Lee wanted a 'new visual language' for the film
-
'Life of Pi' and 'Brave' rule the 11th annual Visual Effects Society Awards
'The Avengers,' 'The Hobbit' and 'The Impossible' also pick up prizes
We certainly recognize that we live in a global economy and in fact, VES has members in 30 countries around the world. Many of those countries – and many states elsewhere in the US – offer aggressive tax incentives – which seek to lure visual effects work to their communities and away from our state. While California finally created a tax incentive program in 2009 (AB1069, Chapter 731, which was recently extended it to 2017), it is woefully inadequate to the needs of today’s entertainment industry. In effect, thousands of talented visual effects artists are joining the unemployment lines or becoming “migrant film workers”, chasing the work outside our borders because that’s where the jobs have been going and are still going.
The amazing irony is that while 47 of the top 50 films of all time are visual effects driven and billions of dollars of profits are generated yearly, the actual people who create the work are becoming an endangered species in California. In short, Hollywood, the birthplace of all this art and commerce, is quickly becoming the land where creative dreams die on the vine and pink slips for dispossessed artists are being issued at an alarming rate.
We know that there are some out there who are calling for the elimination of all subsidies & tax incentives everywhere around the world. We think that’s a great idea and if there were a magic button that could be pressed to make that a reality, we would press it in a nanosecond. Why? Because California can compete with anyone, anywhere if there’s a level playing field.
But in today’s global economy, where many hundreds of localities around the world are feverishly devising new ways to make California’s piece of the entertainment pie smaller, the fact that California’s program doesn’t meet it’s current needs (it only allocates $100 million yearly … which meets the needs of only about 20% of the work that would stay in California otherwise. For comparison purposes, New York caps its program at $420 million yearly and both Louisiana and Georgia are uncapped in the amount of incentives they offer), and is recklessly negligent to the thousands of visual effects professionals who are daily losing their jobs to other locales around the world. This not only hurts those artists, but also California’s economy because thousands of good paying jobs wind up buttressing the economies of states and countries elsewhere and the technological advances that otherwise would be birthed in California are now taking root elsewhere.
According to a Milken Institute report from July 2010, commenting on the changing entertainment industry economy in California since 2008, their “research shows that if California had managed to retain the 40 percent share of North American employment it once enjoyed, 10,600 direct jobs would have been preserved here in 2008. Furthermore, those direct jobs would have had broader economic impact, generating an additional 25,500 jobs after rippling through other sectors. If the state had maintained its former level of dominance, a total of 36,000 jobs would have been saved, generating $2.4 billion in wages and $4.2 billion in output.”
But until such time as all tax incentives everywhere are a thing of the past, California will need to take action– right now – or we’ll lose many thousands more jobs and Hollywood will soon be the equivalent of an empty storefront.
If you support this call to action for a larger incentive program in California that matches the needs of filmmakers and would keep jobs here, then send letters to our state lawmakers that urges them to get to work immediately to increase our incentive program. See the sample letter below.
Additionally, for the benefit of our membership and visual effects professionals worldwide, we will work with our global VES Sections and others to promote a healthy and vibrant visual effects industry in every country where visual effects are created. It is for all of our worldwide colleagues – here in California and everywhere else – that we hope a VFX Congress can bring us all together in a truly meaningful way. Details of when and where the Congress will take place will be forthcoming. Together we can make amazing things happen.
As always, feel free to send us your comments at leadership@visualeffectssociety.com.
Respectfully,
Eric Roth
Executive Director
Visual Effects Society
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Un Certain Regard entry sets pulses racing with surfeit of steamy gay actionFriday, May 17, 2013
-
Matthias Schoenaerts will also star in the Fox Searchlight co-productionFriday, May 17, 2013
-
Noah Baumbach's latest heads out in limited release this weekendFriday, May 17, 2013
-
The wrath of a sequel lands on screens this weekendFriday, May 17, 2013








Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupDefRef
February 28, 2013 at 12:23PM EST Reply to CommentThe whole latter can be boiled down to this: "Dear Governor Brown - Please confiscate more money from the already over-taxed citizens of a high cost state and give it to us in the form of corporate welfare for Hollywood, I mean, tax incentives. Yeah, that's the ticket."
California is billions in debt; overrun with illegal aliens (whoops, that would be "undocumented pre-citizens"); strangled by municipal unions; committed to spending at least $68 billion for high speed rail which will cost much, much more; and just voted to punish high earners by ganking 13.3% of their income on top of the 39.6% Federal bite, etc.; and in order to save the VFX industry is being cajoled for some more debt and some more taxes to be accrued.
How about this: GET OUT OF CALIFORNIA! Studios don't care where their work comes from which is why it's going overseas so they won't notice if the work is coming from another state. What's preventing VFX houses from moving to Nevada or Texas where the the business climate is better and the workers would keep more of their paychecks? I mean, other than people like going to the beach? Is Austin so unacceptable if it means having a job?
The distortions in the market caused by government interference and subsidies cause endless problems like this. While the letter says that if all the subsidies everywhere else went away things would be fine, is the proper response to areas bribing work into their zones with tax dollars be responded to with bribes of our own? When does it stop?
Michigan had the top tax rebate rate in the country and we had so much work coming in that they built a state-of-the-art studio for the anticipated work and Oz: The Great and Powerful was shot there. Other productions in the area included Red Dawn, Whip It, Kill the Irishman, Real Steel, Detroit 1-8-7, and Harold & Kumar Christmas. I have a lot of friends who were working on these productions on both sides of the cameras. The Avengers was slated to come in until the governor announced that he was cutting back on the corporate welfare pool and within a couple of days, they were off to Cleveland to suck up the Ohio corporate welfare. People here were outraged, but I noticed that the people demanding the film incentives be reinstated were the same ones decrying bank bailouts or tax breaks for heavy industries that would create permanent year-round jobs in the state. (Funny how support for corporate welfare varies by who benefits from it, no?)
Is it unfair that some states are willing to transfer tax dollars to rich companies more than others? Sure, but is the solution more transfer payments from the unconnected to the connected; sacrificing municipal services to bring the glitter factory to town; you didn't need that pothole filled, did you?
The core problem of incentives/subsidies/welfare is that Hollywood wants taxpayers to subsidize their productions when they're reaping huge profits. The Best Picture nominees have taken in over $947 billion worldwide and their budgets totaled about $465 billion. (How does Django Unchained cost almost as much as Argo, Zero Dark Thirty and Silver Linings Playbook COMBINED or 65% more than Lincoln or Les Miz?) You're telling me that Hollywood can't afford to pony up the difference? How is it that Hollywood can cheer how much money they make in one breath and then cry poor mouth in the next and people demand the government hand out tax dollars rather than attack the Scrooge-like behavior of studios?