Roundup: Bless the 'Beasts' and 'Lincoln'
What do "Beasts of the Southern Wild" and "Lincoln" have in common? Beyond both being American Oscar hopefuls that happen to be his two favorite films of the year, A.O. Scott thinks they share something else: a "Spielbergian" quality: "Both films have been accused of painting some of the calamities of American life, past and present — poverty, slavery, racism, environmental disaster — in unduly optimistic colors.“Lincoln” and “Beasts” are radically, fundamentally and in complementary ways, about freedom... They are also examples of what, for an American filmmaker, freedom looks like." Good points all round, and also indicative of why, in my opinion, "Beasts" has a cleaner shot at a Best Picture nod than many believe it does right now. [New York Times]
Sasha Stone adds her voice to the debate over the depiction of torture in "Zero Dark Thirty," concluding that it should be viewed as nothing more -- or less -- than a thoughtful Hollywood take on a dangerous subject. [Awards Daily]
How "Les Mis," according to Frank Shyong, answers the apprehensions of skeptical theater geeks. [LA Times]
Chris Laverty, meanwhile, reviews the film with a specific eye on its costume symbolism. [Clothes on Film]
Nathaniel Rogers gets some melancholy reflections from Nicole Kidman on her Oscar win 10 years ago: "I really remember going back and the next morning waking up and I didn't have anybody, really, to call or celebrate with." [The Film Experience]