Cannes Film Festival 2013

Roundup: Are the Academy's new doc rules really democratic?

Also: A kinky year at the movies, and Ramsay to send 'Moby Dick' into space

<p>A scene from "The Imposter," one of the films voters will be considering for the Best Documentary Oscar. </p>

A scene from "The Imposter," one of the films voters will be considering for the Best Documentary Oscar. 

Credit: Indomina Releasing

Are you a fan of In Contention?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

Earlier this year, the Academy's alteration of the eligibility criteria for Best Documentary contenders -- limiting it to bi-coastal theatrical releases from the calendar year -- was generally hailed as a positive move that would de-ghettoise the category. But as branch voters are now being plied with around 100 Academy screeners, some are wondering if the changes are either workable or fair, particularly now that the discs arrive "with a letter suggesting specific films to focus on." That seems hugely ill-advised to me, and several Academy members too -- while most voters may not have time to see all the eligible films, instructing their viewing in this way surely defeats the very point of the new voting system. Dave Itzkoff looks into the issue. (Meanwhile, I'll be belatedly compiling a Contenders page for the category over the weekend.) [New York Times]

Taking such releases as "The Paperboy" and "The Master" into account, Marlow Stern wonders if this is the year of kinky sex at the movies. (I wouldn't call what goes down in "The Master" kinky, but it's a fun read.) [Daily Beast]

Want More...

Academy Awards?
  • Oscar-statues-outside-the-82nd-academy-awards-at-the-kodak-theater-in-hollywood-ca
    Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.

Between supposed frontrunners John Hawkes, Joaquin Phoenix and Daniel Day-Lewis, Daniel Montgomery wonders if this year's Best Actor race is a battle of Oscar-bait archetypes. [Gold Derby]

After completing her Natalie Portman-Michael Fassbender western "Jane's Got a Gun," Lynne Ramsay is planning a sci-fi adaptation of "Moby Dick." Just give the woman everything she asks for, people. [The Guardian

In the wake of its SAG disqualification, Glenn Whipp runs down the Oscar prospects for "Beasts of the Southern Wild" across the board. [The Envelope]

Helena Bonham Carter talks "Great Expectations" and dolls up as a slutty usherette. (Her words.) You should brush your hair more often, ma'am. It suits you. [Time Out London]  

As a further reminder that there's more to the Academy than an awards show, they recently revealed the finalists for this year's Nicholls Fellowship in Screenwriting. [Thompson on Hollywood]

Speaking of rising talent, Mark London Williams reports from the Emerging Cinematographers Awards at the Directors' Guild of America. [Below the Line]

Sasha Stone lays out 10 rules of conduct for Oscar pundits this season. We'll all wind up breaking them. But cheers for namecheck! [Awards Daily]

The Screen Awards, which take place in London tonight, honor the top achievements in UK film marketing. Among the nominees for Poster Design of the Year: "Weekend" and "The Iron Lady." Well, I suppose you couldn't miss it. [Screen Awards]

Guy-lodge-sm
Guy Lodge
Critic
Guy Lodge is a South African-born critic and sometime screenwriter. In addition to his work at In Contention, he is a freelance contributor to Variety, Time Out, Empire and The Guardian. He lives well beyond his means in London.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    JuanL

    We don't expect all the Oscar votes to see every eligible film that is released in the entire year and I don't see why we should expect the doc branch to watch every movie in their category. Like the main Academy voting block I expect the documentary members to watch the most notable films in their category in a year. Yeah, this is flawed, but its what happens in most categories, so I don't see what the big deal is.

    October 4, 2012 at 11:52AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge I think the Academy recommending that voters watch some films over others is a pretty big deal. I agree that it's both unreasonable and unrealistic to expect voters to watch everything, but suggesting viewing priorities is the studios' job.

      October 4, 2012 at 4:42PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Maxim

    "Meanwhile, I'll be belatedly compiling a Contenders page for the category over the weekend."

    The irony of this statement in the VERY SAME post that questions "suggesting specific films to focus on" is entirely too much.

    Who needs this list of contenders, Mr. Lodge?

    October 4, 2012 at 1:48PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge Who needs a list of contenders in any category? Who needs the sidebar predictions? Who needs this site?

      Why are you here?

      October 4, 2012 at 4:35PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Liz You do, of course, realize that there's a huge difference between this site predicting who will get nominated (when they have virtually zero effect on the outcome, no offense to Team In Contention) and the Academy telling voters what to watch, right?

      Obvious troll continues to be obvious.

      October 4, 2012 at 6:41PM EST

Get Instant Alerts on In Contention

2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS

oscarside.jpg

Best Picture

Best Director

Best Actor

Best Actress

Best Supporting Actor

Best Supporting Actress

Best Adapted Screenplay

Best Original Screenplay

Best Cinematography

Best Costume Design

Best Film Editing

Best Makeup And Hairstyling

Best Original Score

Best Original Song

Best Production Design

Best Sound Editing

Best Sound Mixing

Best Visual Effects

Best Animated Feature Film

Best Documentary Feature

Best Foreign Language Film

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook