Review: 'Mud' brings Jeff Nichols's moodiness to the mainstream
Affecting, conventional coming-of-age tale closes out the Cannes competition
- Critic's Rating C+
- Readers' Rating n/a
Tye Sheridan, Matthew McConaughey and Jacob Lofland in "Mud."
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
CANNES - A funny thing happened during this morning’s introductory press screening of “Mud” – a snafu that would make an already nervous filmmaker clutch his forehead and represents an unusual malfunction in the well-oiled machine of the Cannes Film Festival.
A little over midway through the screening of Arkansas writer-director Jeff Nichols’ third feature, the digitally projected image was suddenly buried under a gaudy griddle of fluorescent green lines, before shots began to overlap and the sound veered out of sync. Swiftly corrected and rewound, the technical error didn’t harm anyone’s enjoyment of what turned out to be a robustly applauded Competition closer, but it did oddly highlight what had been bothering me about this enjoyable, evocative slice of contemporary American classicism: it was the only truly unanticipated moment of the film thus far.
To sling the word ‘familiar’ at “Mud,” a languid coming-of-age tale bathed in wild honey and late afternoon light, is really only half a criticism. To some extent, the film wants to you to recognize it: it’s steeped in a rich tradition of American boy-to-man storytelling, its earthy values usually pinned to the rural landscape, that runs from Mark Twain to “Stand By Me.” Both are valid – and, as the film reaches critics beyond the Croisette, sure to be inescapable – reference points for Nichols’s essentially modest but rather self-indulgently extended study of Southern masculinity in both its formative and corrupted states. 14-year-old Ellis (Tye Sheridan), the film’s serious-minded but risk-favoring protagonist, is clearly constructed as a kind of modern-day Huckleberry Finn, from his river-dwelling explorer’s sense to his independent moral compass.
Nichols isn’t afraid to bind his narrative to such fixtures of American storytelling, not least because “Mud” is a celebration of certain universal rites of passage that can rarely be moved or bent. If the coming-of-age story seems especially vulnerable to cliché, that’s because there’s little they cover that isn’t immediately identifiable to those of us already – sigh – of age. Sometimes, growing up does come down to something as familiar as a first kiss or a first fight; sometimes, it is soundtracked (in our heads at least) with a musical montage. “Mud” nails such personal details with sweet specificity.
Related
-
The Lists: Top 10 most anticipated films of Cannes 2012
From 'The Paperboy' to 'Amour,' the films I can't wait to see on the Croisette
-
Cannes Check: Jeff Nichols's 'Mud'
Continuing our series of Cannes competition previews
What’s disappointing about it, though, is that the director of a film as queasily questioning as “Take Shelter” – a thriller that provocatively threatened American domestic stability with its own protectiveness – seems here to be letting Hollywood supply the memories of his memory piece. An overblown, almost film-scuppering final act sets aside the subtler personal battles of its adolescent protagonist for broader, blander movie heroism, as the delicate, “Night of the Hunter”-echoing child-adult tensions of its woozily atmospheric first half fall prey to a hail of bullets and multiple happy endings. Like the old scriptwriting adage about not being able to place a gun in a story without eventually pulling the trigger, you can’t introduce Sam Shepard as a crusty ex-CIA marksman without letting him open fire at some point – but the film doesn’t much benefit from the payoff.
We’re introduced to Ellis on a typical summertime jaunt, escaping the house and rowing to an unpopulated river island with his best friend, the more skittish and perplexingly named Neckbone (Jacob Lofland), in tow. They’re in search of an abandoned boat allegedly tossed into the trees by a recently flood; they find it, but with it comes Mud (Matthew McConaughey), a convicted kille occupying the island as his hideout from the law. Despite Neckbone’s misgivings, Ellis agrees to help the shiftily charismatic fugitive engineer his escape, aiding the fixing of the boat and acting as a go-between for Mud and his burnt-out girlfriend Juniper (Reese Witherspoon).
Heeding neither Juniper’s warnings about Mud’s volatility nor some pretty pointed symbolism – neither the snake tattoo coiled around Mud’s arm nor the real-life serpents writhing in the waters suggest to him an influence to be avoided in this island garden of Eden – Ellis’s determined investment in this ill-qualified role model points to the child’s acceptance of un-ideal authority and compromised personal values, an adult realization fed in the background by his parents’ impending divorce.
It’s a touching arc, supported in empathetic if slightly dewy fashion by the David Gordon Green-style romanticism the film adopts at the outset – Nichols and Green both attended the North Carolina School of the Arts and have shared below-the-line collaborators, but the connection between them has never been so obvious. It’s dissatisfyingly arrested, then, when Mud’s more gung-ho escape becomes the dominant story motor, reducing Ellis to an enabling role and critically defusing any sense of moral consequence at play. Gender politics go to ruin as well, as the film patently sides with the paternal influences in the boy’s life, rather vaguely writing off its female characters – Witherspoon’s justifiably wary collaborator, Sarah Paulson as Ellis’s loving but divorce-initiating mother and Kristy Barrington as the high-school crush who’s happy just playing the field – as selfish obstacles to his plans.
Not as regionally flavorful as Nichols’ striking debut, nor as urgently ambiguous or socially nervy as “Take Shelter,” the often impressive “Mud” is the first of the director’s home-oriented dramas to come tempered with nostalgia – not just in the stories it references, but in the unobligated, paternalistic society it seemingly wishes to protect. (With a Beach Boys-bookended soundtrack and only fleeting glimpses of modern technology, you could be forgiven for thinking it’s a period piece.) Sensitively performed across the board – Sheridan, who rather aptly also starred in the thematically companionable “The Tree of Life,” is a real find – and serenely shot by Adam Stone, it is, when not not examined too closely, unexpectedly comforting cinema after the silent alarm of Nichols’ previous film. That, however, is as far as its surprises go.
For more views on movies, awards season and other pursuits, follow @GuyLodge on Twitter.
Sign up for Instant Alerts from In Contention!
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Cambodian film 'The Missing Picture' wins Un Certain Regard sectionSaturday, May 25, 2013
-
A series of talking points and a full annotated transcript hit the netSaturday, May 25, 2013
-
Jim Jarmusch is on typically deadpan form in mildly amusing vampire filmSaturday, May 25, 2013
-
Audiences revisit Celine and Jesse this weekendFriday, May 24, 2013






Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupthatguy
May 26, 2012 at 5:20PM EST Reply to CommentThis is why, when it comes to films screened at Cannes, I often wait for the reviews that come when the movie is officially released. For whatever reason, Cannes has a way of getting those few critics who attend to write mixed review after mixed review for nearly every single film screened. With the exception of foreign films (Amour, Rust and Bone) and "little surprises" (Beasts of the Southern Wild) of course.
And then those same films that drew a mixed reaction are praised to high heaven when theatrical release comes around. It's tiresome that the Cannes critics (primarily bloggers) keep doing this. Happened to Inglourious Basterds and Tree of Life. Something about that festival brings out the negative.
Beasts is not a surprise. Most American critics already saw it at Sundance.
May 26, 2012 at 5:47PM ESTGuy Lodge "for nearly every single film screened. With the exception of foreign films"
May 26, 2012 at 7:14PM ESTGiven that most of the films at Cannes are foreign, care to adjust that statement at all?
I'm sorry you find mixed reviews "tiresome." I think the same of kneejerk pans and raves -- precious few films merit either.
thatguy I should've been more clear. The fact that the reviews are mixed isn't tiresome. It's the fact that the critics who frequent Cannes frequently dole out mixed reviews or pans, thus leading people, including myself, to lose hope for films coming out in the fall that we had been anticipating. Then those same films are released to a rapturous response from the rest of the moviegoing world months later. This has happened every year.
May 27, 2012 at 2:16AM ESTSo I guess my point is that it's tiresome that I often can't trust the buzz coming out of Cannes, because it's been wrong time and time again. And I have a feeling Mud will be one of those.
thatguy As for the line about foreign films, you have a point. I do think that U.S. critics are softer on foreign films than American films though. Perhaps the language barrier hides any possible hint of bad acting, I don't know.
May 27, 2012 at 2:20AM ESTGuy Lodge "And I have a feeling Mud will be one of those."
May 27, 2012 at 3:28AM ESTMud is getting many very good reviews, so don't let mine speak for the rest. The applause for it after the press screening was some of the warmest I've heard all festival.
Liz
May 26, 2012 at 5:56PM EST Reply to Comment"Cannes has a way of getting those few critics who attend to write mixed review after mixed review for nearly every single film screened."
Considering that there have been multiple raves from multiple critics for, among others, Amour, Rust and Bone, Holy Motors, Moonrise Kingdom, No, and Killing Them Softly, I'd say that this really isn't true. Just because they're not unanimous raves for every movie across the board doesn't mean that the critics are exalting in the negative.
Liz Whoops, that should have been a response to ThatGuy.
May 26, 2012 at 5:56PM ESTJake G!!!
May 26, 2012 at 6:36PM EST Reply to CommentWhen are you guys going to update the side predictions? Its been a long time now!
Guy Lodge Sometime after Cannes, I guess. Whining isn't going to speed things up any. ;)
May 26, 2012 at 7:17PM EST
And certainly don't whine to Guy. Now, Kris? Well...
May 26, 2012 at 10:19PM ESTGuy Lodge
May 26, 2012 at 7:18PM EST Reply to CommentSo, about this movie called Mud...
Liz I admit to being slightly disappointed that several critics I trust are mixed on the movie. I liked (didn't love) Take Shelter, and I was hoping for huge growth for Nichols this time around.
May 26, 2012 at 7:33PM ESTBut I wouldn't be surprised if I end up liking the movie anyway. I have a soft spot for this kind of slow-burning Americana.