Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: 'Mud' brings Jeff Nichols's moodiness to the mainstream

Affecting, conventional coming-of-age tale closes out the Cannes competition

  • Critic's Rating C+
  • Readers' Rating n/a
<p>Tye Sheridan, Matthew McConaughey and Jacob Lofland in "Mud." </p>

Tye Sheridan, Matthew McConaughey and Jacob Lofland in "Mud." 

Credit: Everest Entertainment

Are you a fan of In Contention?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

CANNES - A funny thing happened during this morning’s introductory press screening of “Mud” – a snafu that would make an already nervous filmmaker clutch his forehead and represents an unusual malfunction in the well-oiled machine of the Cannes Film Festival.

A little over midway through the screening of Arkansas writer-director Jeff Nichols’ third feature, the digitally projected image was suddenly buried under a gaudy griddle of fluorescent green lines, before shots began to overlap and the sound veered out of sync. Swiftly corrected and rewound, the technical error didn’t harm anyone’s enjoyment of what turned out to be a robustly applauded Competition closer, but it did oddly highlight what had been bothering me about this enjoyable, evocative slice of contemporary American classicism: it was the only truly unanticipated moment of the film thus far.

To sling the word ‘familiar’ at “Mud,” a languid coming-of-age tale bathed in wild honey and late afternoon light, is really only half a criticism. To some extent, the film wants to you to recognize it: it’s steeped in a rich tradition of American boy-to-man storytelling, its earthy values usually pinned to the rural landscape, that runs from Mark Twain to “Stand By Me.” Both are valid – and, as the film reaches critics beyond the Croisette, sure to be inescapable – reference points for Nichols’s essentially modest but rather self-indulgently extended study of Southern masculinity in both its formative and corrupted states. 14-year-old Ellis (Tye Sheridan), the film’s serious-minded but risk-favoring protagonist, is clearly constructed as a kind of modern-day Huckleberry Finn, from his river-dwelling explorer’s sense to his independent moral compass.

Nichols isn’t afraid to bind his narrative to such fixtures of American storytelling, not least because “Mud” is a celebration of certain universal rites of passage that can rarely be moved or bent. If the coming-of-age story seems especially vulnerable to cliché, that’s because there’s little they cover that isn’t immediately identifiable to those of us already – sigh – of age. Sometimes, growing up does come down to something as familiar as a first kiss or a first fight; sometimes, it is soundtracked (in our heads at least) with a musical montage. “Mud” nails such personal details with sweet specificity.

Related

Want More...

Academy Awards?
  • Oscar-statues-outside-the-82nd-academy-awards-at-the-kodak-theater-in-hollywood-ca
    Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.

What’s disappointing about it, though, is that the director of a film as queasily questioning as “Take Shelter” – a thriller that provocatively threatened American domestic stability with its own protectiveness – seems here to be letting Hollywood supply the memories of his memory piece. An overblown, almost film-scuppering final act sets aside the subtler personal battles of its adolescent protagonist for broader, blander movie heroism, as the delicate, “Night of the Hunter”-echoing child-adult tensions of its woozily atmospheric first half fall prey to a hail of bullets and multiple happy endings. Like the old scriptwriting adage about not being able to place a gun in a story without eventually pulling the trigger, you can’t introduce Sam Shepard as a crusty ex-CIA marksman without letting him open fire at some point – but the film doesn’t much benefit from the payoff.

We’re introduced to Ellis on a typical summertime jaunt, escaping the house and rowing to an unpopulated river island with his best friend, the more skittish and perplexingly named Neckbone (Jacob Lofland), in tow. They’re in search of an abandoned boat allegedly tossed into the trees by a recently flood; they find it, but with it comes Mud (Matthew McConaughey), a convicted kille occupying the island as his hideout from the law. Despite Neckbone’s misgivings, Ellis agrees to help the shiftily charismatic fugitive engineer his escape, aiding the fixing of the boat and acting as a go-between for Mud and his burnt-out girlfriend Juniper (Reese Witherspoon).

Heeding neither Juniper’s warnings about Mud’s volatility nor some pretty pointed symbolism – neither the snake tattoo coiled around Mud’s arm nor the real-life serpents writhing in the waters suggest to him an influence to be avoided in this island garden of Eden – Ellis’s determined investment in this ill-qualified role model points to the child’s acceptance of un-ideal authority and compromised personal values, an adult realization fed in the background by his parents’ impending divorce.

It’s a touching arc, supported in empathetic if slightly dewy fashion by the David Gordon Green-style romanticism the film adopts at the outset – Nichols and Green both attended the North Carolina School of the Arts and have shared below-the-line collaborators, but the connection between them has never been so obvious. It’s dissatisfyingly arrested, then, when Mud’s more gung-ho escape becomes the dominant story motor, reducing Ellis to an enabling role and critically defusing any sense of moral consequence at play. Gender politics go to ruin as well, as the film patently sides with the paternal influences in the boy’s life, rather vaguely writing off its female characters – Witherspoon’s justifiably wary collaborator, Sarah Paulson as Ellis’s loving but divorce-initiating mother and Kristy Barrington as the high-school crush who’s happy just playing the field – as selfish obstacles to his plans.

Not as regionally flavorful as Nichols’ striking debut, nor as urgently ambiguous or socially nervy as “Take Shelter,” the often impressive “Mud” is the first of the director’s home-oriented dramas to come tempered with nostalgia – not just in the stories it references, but in the unobligated, paternalistic society it seemingly wishes to protect. (With a Beach Boys-bookended soundtrack and only fleeting glimpses of modern technology, you could be forgiven for thinking it’s a period piece.) Sensitively performed across the board – Sheridan, who rather aptly also starred in the thematically companionable “The Tree of Life,” is a real find – and serenely shot by Adam Stone, it is, when not not examined too closely, unexpectedly comforting cinema after the silent alarm of Nichols’ previous film. That, however, is as far as its surprises go. 

For more views on movies, awards season and other pursuits, follow @GuyLodge on Twitter. 

Sign up for Instant Alerts from In Contention!

Guy-lodge-sm
Guy Lodge
Critic
Guy Lodge is a South African-born critic and sometime screenwriter. In addition to his work at In Contention, he is a freelance contributor to Variety, Time Out, Empire and The Guardian. He lives well beyond his means in London.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    thatguy

    This is why, when it comes to films screened at Cannes, I often wait for the reviews that come when the movie is officially released. For whatever reason, Cannes has a way of getting those few critics who attend to write mixed review after mixed review for nearly every single film screened. With the exception of foreign films (Amour, Rust and Bone) and "little surprises" (Beasts of the Southern Wild) of course.

    And then those same films that drew a mixed reaction are praised to high heaven when theatrical release comes around. It's tiresome that the Cannes critics (primarily bloggers) keep doing this. Happened to Inglourious Basterds and Tree of Life. Something about that festival brings out the negative.

    May 26, 2012 at 5:20PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Beasts is not a surprise. Most American critics already saw it at Sundance.

      May 26, 2012 at 5:47PM EST
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge "for nearly every single film screened. With the exception of foreign films"

      Given that most of the films at Cannes are foreign, care to adjust that statement at all?

      I'm sorry you find mixed reviews "tiresome." I think the same of kneejerk pans and raves -- precious few films merit either.

      May 26, 2012 at 7:14PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      thatguy I should've been more clear. The fact that the reviews are mixed isn't tiresome. It's the fact that the critics who frequent Cannes frequently dole out mixed reviews or pans, thus leading people, including myself, to lose hope for films coming out in the fall that we had been anticipating. Then those same films are released to a rapturous response from the rest of the moviegoing world months later. This has happened every year.

      So I guess my point is that it's tiresome that I often can't trust the buzz coming out of Cannes, because it's been wrong time and time again. And I have a feeling Mud will be one of those.

      May 27, 2012 at 2:16AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      thatguy As for the line about foreign films, you have a point. I do think that U.S. critics are softer on foreign films than American films though. Perhaps the language barrier hides any possible hint of bad acting, I don't know.

      May 27, 2012 at 2:20AM EST
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge "And I have a feeling Mud will be one of those."

      Mud is getting many very good reviews, so don't let mine speak for the rest. The applause for it after the press screening was some of the warmest I've heard all festival.

      May 27, 2012 at 3:28AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Liz

    "Cannes has a way of getting those few critics who attend to write mixed review after mixed review for nearly every single film screened."

    Considering that there have been multiple raves from multiple critics for, among others, Amour, Rust and Bone, Holy Motors, Moonrise Kingdom, No, and Killing Them Softly, I'd say that this really isn't true. Just because they're not unanimous raves for every movie across the board doesn't mean that the critics are exalting in the negative.

    May 26, 2012 at 5:56PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Liz Whoops, that should have been a response to ThatGuy.

      May 26, 2012 at 5:56PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Jake G!!!

    When are you guys going to update the side predictions? Its been a long time now!

    May 26, 2012 at 6:36PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Guypic_talkback_profile

      Guy Lodge Sometime after Cannes, I guess. Whining isn't going to speed things up any. ;)

      May 26, 2012 at 7:17PM EST
    • And certainly don't whine to Guy. Now, Kris? Well...

      May 26, 2012 at 10:19PM EST
  • Guypic_talkback_profile

    Guy Lodge

    So, about this movie called Mud...

    May 26, 2012 at 7:18PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Liz I admit to being slightly disappointed that several critics I trust are mixed on the movie. I liked (didn't love) Take Shelter, and I was hoping for huge growth for Nichols this time around.

      But I wouldn't be surprised if I end up liking the movie anyway. I have a soft spot for this kind of slow-burning Americana.

      May 26, 2012 at 7:33PM EST

Get Instant Alerts on In Contention

2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS

oscarside.jpg

Best Picture

Best Director

Best Actor

Best Actress

Best Supporting Actor

Best Supporting Actress

Best Adapted Screenplay

Best Original Screenplay

Best Cinematography

Best Costume Design

Best Film Editing

Best Makeup And Hairstyling

Best Original Score

Best Original Song

Best Production Design

Best Sound Editing

Best Sound Mixing

Best Visual Effects

Best Animated Feature Film

Best Documentary Feature

Best Foreign Language Film

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook