Cannes Film Festival 2013

Off the Carpet: Something everyone can agree on

As polling draws to a close, one film seems to have blanket approval

<p>Ben Affleck on the set of "Argo"</p>

Ben Affleck on the set of "Argo"

Credit: Warner Bros. Pictures

Are you a fan of In Contention?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

When asked this season what film I think will win Best Picture, I've said "Les Misérables" since about September. Obviously for a stretch that was sight-unseen. Then the film, and others, came along. And I stuck with it. Largely I had to defend the call against those who couldn't see a film that is perceived as "divisive" (and boy are the detractors LOUD) winning the top prize, and they had a fair enough point.

The only thing is, I see passion for the film and the nay-sayers are a bit marginalized. Critics and industry people view this film differently. And those who love the film LOVE it. You can't ignore that kind of embrace. Few films this year really have it. And it's particularly important in a season that seems more up-for-grabs than any in recent history.

But as more and more members have finally caught up with the majority of the season's offerings in the past few weeks, I've made sure I paid attention to one thing in particular in my conversations: consensus. Consensus and general agreement wins you Oscars. But many films have inherent marks against them. There are really only two films, though, that tend to be enjoyed, adored, respected and liked all the way across the board, and one of them has taken shape as the potential taker of the cake. That film is "Argo."

The other film, by the way, is "Silver Linings Playbook," but I don't think it has the proper weight to carry through to a win. The Weinstein Company will put up a valiant fight, as they should. Gunning for three in a row is noble and they have another crowd-pleaser. But it's not my bet.

When I rank these films here and at the Gurus o' Gold collective at Movie City News, I approach it from the standpoint of "most likely to be nominated." And passion drives that consideration more than it does in the vote for the win, given the process by which votes are counted. So "Les Mis" is still on top for me in that regard. Its champions are in love, moved, rocked by the film. But when all those number twos and number threes start to pile up in the vote for Best Picture during phase two, "Argo" is likely to pop up more often than "Les Misérables," and that will obviously be key.

Want More...

Academy Awards?
  • Oscar-statues-outside-the-82nd-academy-awards-at-the-kodak-theater-in-hollywood-ca
    Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.

None of this is an epiphany. Guy has been picking "Argo" for a while for these same reasons. Many readers have, too. But it didn't settle for me until I really got a (tangible) load of how much it is holding strong with Academy members. And boy is it ever.

When the rest of the season's offerings came along, it seemed like Ben Affleck's film had been elbowed out of the way. There were shiny new things for the press to play with and chew on and prop up. But it's crucial to point out that "Argo" is the one nipping at the heels of "Zero Dark Thirty" for critics' Best Picture prizes this season, not "Lincoln," not "Silver Linings Playbook," and obviously not "Les Mis." It's still here. It still comes up in every single conversation with members. It still feels like the thoroughbred it was out of the gate in Telluride.

"But 'Argo' can't win anything else," some say. Well, not true. It can win Best Director; Ben Affleck is well-liked and is seen as resurrected by his filmmaking career, while 2010's "The Town" is perceived in many circles as a film that should have gone farther. It can win Best Adapted Screenplay; it's a tough race with "Lincoln" and "Silver Linings Playbook" in there but Chris Terrio can easily take the prize with his "The Ends of the Earth" turning on actors and filmmakers behind the scenes right now. It can win Best Supporting Actor, believe it or not; Alan Arkin is in the same boat as Tommy Lee Jones, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Robert De Niro in that they've all won before, so it's a level playing field. And it can win Best Film Editing; William Goldenberg will likely be duking it out with himself (and co-editor Dylan Tichenor) for the work that went into "Zero Dark Thirty" for that award.

Speaking of Kathryn Bigelow's film, more members haven't seen the film than I would have thought at this point. And a lot of ballots have already been turned in. That can also be said of films like "Amour" and "The Impossible." The truncated schedule has sent things into a tizzy and that, by the way, is another thing currently in "Argo"'s favor: it's been visible for a long time. Early fall launches ended up being fortuitous in a schedule such as this. That's also true of films like "Flight" and "Skyfall."

Phase two is always a different beast and anything can happen. This year it will be uniquely interesting because it will be a massive six weeks rather than the usual four. It could get ugly, too, given how tight the race is. But "Argo" has survived the tempest so far and there's no reason to think it can't survive a little bit longer.

So as the year draws to a close, I would be tempted to move my chips -- which I haven't been overly vocal about, except by way of defense -- over to Ben Affleck's thrilling, crowd-pleasing, unassuming and well-regarded third feature film. But nothing's a safe bet. "Les Misérables" could still win. "Lincoln" could win. It's still a race, as much as it ever was.

And that's why this year is so exciting.

Check out my updated predictions HERE and, as always, see how Guy Lodge, Greg Ellwood and I collectively think the season will turn out at THE CONTENDERS.

Kristopher-tapley-sm
Kristopher Tapley
Editor-at-Large
Kristopher Tapley has covered the film awards landscape for over a decade. He founded In Contention in 2005. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, The Times of London and Variety. He begs you not to take any of this too seriously.

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    RichardZ

    The passion that might have been displayed in the NYC screening of Les Mis to an extended, orgasmic applause--might have been just because it's New Yorkers. They tend to clap at everything--even between movements in a symphony. (Love you NY!, but you cray sometimes.)

    Having said that, I really like the big screen version of Les Mis and it really crystallized some of the narrative and emotions that the stage version might not have been exactly clear on.

    But, as my Oscar predix for this year, it's Argo. It's gonna be big for Best Director more than anything else.

    The campaign should play on the role of Hollywood in the whole effort.

    December 31, 2012 at 4:11PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley It wasn't just in NY, Richard.

      December 31, 2012 at 4:16PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      daveylo As a native New Yorker, believe me, if they had disliked Les Miz, they would not have clapped or stood up.

      January 1, 2013 at 12:29PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    CaptainCanada

    I really like "Argo", but it's always struck me as the Academy's somewhat generic backup plan in case none of the more artistically daring movies paid off.

    December 31, 2012 at 4:28PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      JJ1 Um, yes.

      January 1, 2013 at 8:24AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Derek 8-Track Totally agree.

      January 1, 2013 at 2:05PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    mikey67

    Kris -- I'm curious about why Lincoln isn't a frontrunner for Best Pic, in your view. The audience I saw it with yesterday was rapt. Great screenplay, cast of thousands, makeup and hair for days. Seems like that perfect Oscar play. What's holding it back? The only complaint I have about it is the ending.

    December 31, 2012 at 4:51PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley It's right in there. A three-way race. But I've talked to members who thought it was too long, some who fell asleep watching it (which wasn't an expressed knock against the film, they just weren't in the frame of mind), etc. Others have issues with the strong-arming campaign.

      December 31, 2012 at 4:57PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JJ1 I know. Lincoln is a bit of a strange one. I FEEL like this should be the no-brainer. Spielberg, DDL, cast of thousands, wonderful acting, superb writing, stellar craftwork, the reviews, the most BFCA/GG noms, the word of mouth(!), that this will sail past 150 million, the peestige/importance (which the Academy loves) ... I could go on.

      And yet, and yet, as mentioned, why does it feel like an easy miss, too?

      My mother and grandmother saw it yesterday (age 59, 86). Both reallllly liked it, both EXPECTED to like it, but they both also thought it'd be "better" (expectations?). That said, knowing them and the film at hand, after a few viewings (and getting every bit of dialogue down pat), I'm sure they'll absolutely love it and want me to buy it for them.

      So there are 2 older female endorsements. Um, I don't know. I haven't seen ZD30 or Django yet (seeing the latter today). But foir what I've seen, I'm hoping for Lincoln to win - just because I found Argo to be good but underwhelming and SLP nice, but underwhelming.

      I LOVED Les Mis, but I have doubts about it's win - probably because of all the negativity chatter; which I try to stay/read clear of.

      January 1, 2013 at 8:36AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Frank Lee I've now seen "Les Miz," "Lincoln," and "Life of Pi" in addition to "Argo," and "Argo" seems much the best of the lot. Daniel Day Lewis was terrific and deeply sympathetic in "Lincoln," which only made the film's sacherine hagiography unnecessary (it was already incongruous considering that the plot is about Lincoln's political scheming, which could just as easily have backfired--he succeeded not so much through genius as through luck). "Life of Pi" looked great but was thematically incoherent. And watching "Les Miz" felt like the ten longest hours of my life. Obviously, these are subjective reactions, but there is one point on which I think I can cite objective proof: the editing on "Les Miz" is a clear disaster. During the duets and trios, we'd sometimes hear the women hitting the climatic high notes at the ends of songs, but they would be off screen, as if the director forgot to get coverage. Or the screen would suddenly cut to some old dude (a priest?) in the middle of a trio by the leads--it read like comically bad editing. I can understand that "Les Miz" is popular with a lot of folks, but I have to assume it will have a real hard time getting nominated for best director and best editing. If you look at the eight movies currently predicted as Best Picture nominees on the right side of this page, it looks like the other seven all have a better chance of being nominated for best director.

      January 1, 2013 at 4:09PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Frank Lee

    Kris, You left out the possibility of Ben Affleck being nominated for Best Actor. I realize he did not get nominated for a SAG award, but is there any chance he could bump Bradley Cooper or John Hawkes or Denzel Washington off the list of five nominees?

    December 31, 2012 at 5:11PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley I don't really think so.

      December 31, 2012 at 5:12PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JJ1 I wonder if it's one of those things where the actor's branch will figure that he'll likely get nommed in another way(s).

      January 1, 2013 at 8:38AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    someperson

    I can't view the predictions. It just redirects me to the home page.

    Same thing happened with Guy's article last week, so I don't know if it's just me.

    December 31, 2012 at 5:42PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley Weird. Let me figure it out.

      December 31, 2012 at 5:50PM EST
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley Should be working now. Guy's, too.

      December 31, 2012 at 6:25PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      someperson They are. Thanks

      December 31, 2012 at 8:26PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Andrew

    Kris, while I think you're right to say ZDT's divisiveness makes it a tough sell for winning best pic, is there a chance that the Academy recognizes Bigelow with director? I know no one (except maybe sasha stone) like's to consider the chances of a bp/bd split cause they're so unpredictable, but with such a smattering of solid contenders, each with their own drawbacks (in terms of the race), is it more conceivable than most years?

    (I mentioned Bigelow as the splitter cause most everyone seems really impressed her direction, and even though ZDT is a film the academy can't warm up to, it seems possible they could warm up to what she accomplished as a feat of direction.)

    Also, thanks for another great year of coverage.

    December 31, 2012 at 7:15PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley Splits happen in really close years. This is a really close year. So it's fair to predict a split. I don't think this is Bigelow's year, though.

      December 31, 2012 at 7:21PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JJ1 I agree Andrew. Kris and co., the coverage is phenomenal, as always. Thank you. And Happy New Year.

      January 1, 2013 at 8:39AM EST
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley Thanks guys. Much appreciated.

      January 1, 2013 at 4:05PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Joseph This could be a split year similar to Gladiator/Traffic/Crouching Tiger year.

      January 1, 2013 at 9:38PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    JMC

    I can't agree on "Argo," easily my most overrated film of the year, followed by "Silver Linings Playbook." (Though, I detested "Les Mes,"...but it's reviews are mixed.)

    I standby my belief that, but for a different subject matter, many more would look at "Argo" as a film little more than a never-ending series of thriller film cliches. Arkin and Goodman can't get to the phone because they're stuck behind a film crew..."Oh my!" The plane tickets haven't been processed. "Check again." Alas, with a click of a button, there are those plane tickets (pretty fast processing for the time). "Oh my!" Ohhh...a little boy put their picture together at the exact moment they're at the airport and it quickly gets passed to the airport guards instantaneously. "Oh my!" We've got to drive through a mass of protestors to go to a shopping area where people will yell at us...for no reason other than a dramatic point (I'd say a plot point, but it was worthless to the plot.) Oh, the bus that carries us to the plane struggles to start. Never seen that in every other thriller film.

    I don't fault the film for being almost entirely make believe. I fault it for rewriting history into something that is laughably unrealistic.

    December 31, 2012 at 7:22PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      John I agree with most of this regarding Argo. The story plays out in a predictable and rather cliche fashion. I have read many reactions that state that the film successfully builds tension throughout - a statement that I would disagree with.

      There's a lot to like about the film though, and I'd have no problem with it being nominated for Best Picture. But I would be disappointed if it actually won the big prize in a year as good as this one.

      January 1, 2013 at 1:24AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      daveylo Academy members should rewatch Z or All the President's Men to see how lightweight Argo really is.

      January 1, 2013 at 8:09PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Freddy .....And don't forget... that was in 1979, in order to swallowed all those things you need to suspend disbelieve even more than you do when watching things like The Avenger, The Dark Knight Rises or Les Miserables.

      January 2, 2013 at 11:38AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Adrian Thank you! I agree completely with everything you just said. For me, the movie was doing ok until that last part, when it just became unbearable. And people don't talk about that, which I find strange. My trouble with the movie it's not that it takes a break from reality to try to spice things up and make it a more compelling pic. The whole airport thing, it shouldn't happen: that makes the film worse, not better.

      January 3, 2013 at 2:20PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    NoHubris

    I've been planning on seeing ARGO many times but something always comes up. Now I am making this MY NUMBER ONE MOVIE PRIORITY.

    December 31, 2012 at 10:16PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Pete

    That is an excellent analysis. I am surprised, however, that you made not mention of Life of Pi. It, too, seems a possible compromise choice. I think it is more likely to stand the test of time better than Argo.

    December 31, 2012 at 11:49PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Raylan_-_copy_talkback_profile

      Jonnybon Hear hear.

      January 1, 2013 at 7:43AM EST
    • N25501058_36871357_8293821_talkback_profile

      Mykill I agree! I think Life of Pi stays with you way longer than Argo, Les Mis, or Lincoln (I haven't seen ZDT yet) b/c it opens up so much more for the viewer to interpret in their own way. It is unlike anything else in contention this year but it doesn't have any big showy movie star performances in it so I feel like it is being sidestepped. I definitely agree that it will stick around for a while and I'm sure will have a stronger consensus in a few years time.

      January 2, 2013 at 4:21PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    cineJAB

    So I've been questioning how dedicated you are to Amour being nominated for much of anything, but then I saw it tonight. Wow. I can see how and why it makes sense that voters who have seen that film would have it high on their list. I'm still not sure if enough people have seen it for it to make it in to Best Picture and especially Best Director.

    January 1, 2013 at 12:14AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      daveylo I wished I loved Amour as much as everyone else. The actors were great but I wasn't overwhelmed by the direction or the script.

      January 1, 2013 at 12:31PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Frank Lee I considered seeing "Amour," but the trailer did everything it could to dissuade me from attending.

      January 1, 2013 at 9:56PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    red_wine

    Argo winning would be worse than Crash. It is the most mind-numbingly ordinary and weightless film to be up for awards in quite some time. And really Ben Affleck wins an Oscar for Best Director? The horror of it all does not even begin to compute.

    January 1, 2013 at 4:31AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Paul Outlaw "It is the most mind-numbingly ordinary and weightless film to be up for awards in quite some time."

      I guess you haven't seen Silver Linings Playbook yet.

      January 1, 2013 at 2:08PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JLPatt Hyperbole alert x2.

      January 1, 2013 at 4:00PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Paul Outlaw LOL, JLP.

      January 1, 2013 at 4:47PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      prettok This isn't supposed to be the award for heaviest motion picture. It never has been.

      January 1, 2013 at 11:54PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    daveylo

    I didn't see Argo in Toronto when I was there. I just got to see it last week. I thought it was a solid film, very entertaining with a serious context, and I was surprised that I found Ben Affleck gave the standout performance. I can't say I was thinking about it days after. I wanted to know more about the hostages but maybe they wasn't more to know. And though Goodman and Arkin were fine, I don't see why they deserved acting nominations. I think Lincoln is going to take BP. If Les Miz hadn't been lambasted by some of the critics I think it would win. Unless the Academy voters like it more than we know.

    January 1, 2013 at 12:28PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    daveylo

    It would be bit disappointing if Affleck won best director when there are obviously more daring directorial achievements out there. But if he won, would there as much outrage in some circles as there was when Hooper won?

    January 1, 2013 at 12:37PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Conor I don't think there'd me much outrage, honestly. It's a three-way race and I only think there'd be noise about Hooper winning.

      January 1, 2013 at 5:10PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Paul Outlaw

    Wow, it took me long enough, but I just watched a film that immediately landed in my top 3 of this year, and it joins Rust and Bone, Skyfall and The Sessions as one of the only films in contention that I adore unequivocally: Moonrise Kingdom.

    January 1, 2013 at 4:52PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      daveylo Moonrise Kingdom is lovely. If it had come out later in the year there would be more buzz around it.

      January 1, 2013 at 8:03PM EST
  • Images_talkback_profile

    Laura Stewart

    Ben Affleck winning a best director Oscar before PTA has his chance. That's just plain wrong

    January 1, 2013 at 5:02PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    jessied44

    I would be okay with either Lincoln or Argo winning BP but I really, really want Hugh Jackman to take Best Actor. I'm so tired of him saving less that perfect films by being a great actor and getting overlooked because he is a "nice guy". He conducts a master class in "becoming" as opposed to "acting" in Les Mis and he seems to do it so effortlessly. They might as well just hang a sing on the man, "Genius at work making it look easy". So DDL is getting the press because no one thinks what he does is "easy" and that's because he is acting and always being DDL acting.

    January 1, 2013 at 5:10PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Joseph

    I agree. Argo is important and about our world - just as Lincoln and Zero Dark Thirty are. Silver Linings and Les Mis are crowdpleasers - but so is Argo. It's also an actor turned director which Oscar loves. And it's also has Hollywood in there too. As a film - it's impeccable in craft - great editing and screenplay seamlessly shifting tones and tension. It's just a solid movie and there is a consensus on that. Other films are more divisive.

    January 1, 2013 at 7:24PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Joseph Forgot to mention it has box office too which is kind of a bigger achievement than Lincoln and Les Mis which would have a built-in interest from the get-go.

      January 1, 2013 at 9:33PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    GlennAU

    Don't forget best editing, I definitely think ARGO can win that. Pic + Dir + Editing + maybe screenplay. Sounds like a reasonable haul for a film that isn't the traditional type of "period" film.

    January 1, 2013 at 8:28PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Joseph Exactly. And popular films like The Artist and The King's Speech didn't even win that many in the end - especially King's Speech - none of them craft.

      January 1, 2013 at 9:34PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Joseph Crash only won 3 Oscars as well.

      January 1, 2013 at 10:06PM EST
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley I...didn't. To wit:

      "And it can win Best Film Editing; William Goldenberg will likely be duking it out with himself (and co-editor Dylan Tichenor) for the work that went into "Zero Dark Thirty" for that award."

      January 2, 2013 at 1:08AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Jason Liang

    Like many people, I haven't seen ZDT but I've seen Argo, and Argo is a fine, even intellectually interesting film, but it should not be a film that wins this year in this field with other films speaking out of courage and heart, such as ZDT, The Master, Les Miz and Cloud Atlas.

    Argo is self- absorbed, myopic. At its best, it is superficial discussion about the role that art plays in the modern real world. How embarassing would it be in the eyes of history for Hollywood to choose by consensus a movie that serves to valorize Hollywood as the best picture this year? How needy and insecure we are if we pick a movie that serves to reassure us of our own social importance? And at Argo's worst, how embarrassed will the industry be to pick a movie that ends on such a hackneyed, derivative closing sequence? I didn't feel like cheering as the plane took off leaving the Revolutionary Guard in the dust; I felt like crawling into a dark hole. I was embarrassed for the film. You can't pick this film for this sequence alone; our storytelling today has evolved far too sophisticated for this.

    Voters need to be reminded how important their selection is. It is not just hardware on some producer's mantle. Which film they choose will influence how people 15, 30 years from now will feel about Hollywood filmmaking. Annie Hall and Godfather and Midnight Cowboy and Amadeus. Don't drop the ball. There is nothing which is "best" about Argo.

    January 2, 2013 at 2:57AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Remy

    Every year the Best Picture Oscar seems up for grabs before the major precursors hand out their awards. If there's a match between the BFCA, the Golden Globe and the PGA wins, then it's over as usual. If they don't all match, then the race is still between whatever movies won those awards.

    January 2, 2013 at 7:38AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Remy And I know that "Crash" is an exception to these rules, but that was an unusual year.

      January 2, 2013 at 7:42AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    The Dude

    Well, if you go to a Twilight premiere, I'm sure you'll have a lot of fans clapping and screaming like mad as well... Hard to take these kinds of reactions too seriously with these adaptations that have already a very crazy fanbase that will scream about it anyway.

    But, yeah, it's Argo. I don't see why you think they will give Hooper another Oscar after his very controversial win two years ago.

    January 2, 2013 at 11:27AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Krispic3_talkback_profile

      Kristopher Tapley Ask anyone who attended the Los Angeles Academy screening of "Les Mis." Blew the roof off. They aren't trucking in theater queens for this stuff. These were guild and Academy screenings.

      January 2, 2013 at 7:47PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    JeremyBaril

    I know of at least one academy voter who disliked Argo. But then again, one does not make or change consensus.

    January 2, 2013 at 1:46PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on In Contention

2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS

oscarside.jpg

Best Picture

Best Director

Best Actor

Best Actress

Best Supporting Actor

Best Supporting Actress

Best Adapted Screenplay

Best Original Screenplay

Best Cinematography

Best Costume Design

Best Film Editing

Best Makeup And Hairstyling

Best Original Score

Best Original Song

Best Production Design

Best Sound Editing

Best Sound Mixing

Best Visual Effects

Best Animated Feature Film

Best Documentary Feature

Best Foreign Language Film

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook