Off the Carpet: Setting the table for the 2012-2013 film awards season
First set of predictions (that are as good as the next guy's)
Jude Law and Keira Knightley in "Anna Karenina"
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
It's that time of year. Well, no, not THAT time. Awards season is still a healthy ways off and anyone giving it overtly serious consideration right now is in for a hurtin'. But with 2012's midway point fast approaching, it's a valid time to take stock of the film year so far, and to take a glance ahead at the season to come.
And yes, I suppose it's as good a time as any (on the early side of things) to update the sidebar predictions with uneducated stabs in the dark so we don't go on looking like we're living in the past.
First, a quick recap. Very quick, actually, as the only Best Picture stories of the year so far have been made on the basis of admittedly impressive box office success. But to me, considerations of "The Hunger Games" and "The Avengers" for serious Oscar contention feel a bit like hot air in the hot months with little else to grease the awards conversation gears.
On the flip side of box office success is, obviously, box office failure, as films like "John Carter" and "Battleship" and the already hypothetical crafts consideration they were expected to receive took on some damage.
One of the best films of the year is still one of the earliest films to release: Joe Carnahan's "The Grey." If Open Road senses some weaknesses in the later part of the year, I suppose they could bring it back around for re-release and test the waters. But perhaps the ship has sailed.
Also in the cream of the crop is Wes Anderson's "Moonrise Kingdom," already a box office lightning rod in limited release. But how far can Focus Features push it? And how long can they keep it alive, particularly with a perceived heavy hitter like "Anna Karenina" on the way?
Speaking of box office in limited release, the under-the-radar story of the season could well end up being Fox Searchlight's "The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel." The film has already crossed $100 million worldwide and is in the top tier of the studio's box office successes to date. Not only that: Academy members eat it up with a spoon.
So on that point, this is a pretty good spot to start the looking ahead, and we might as well keep it with Searchlight. The studio has "Beasts of the Southern Wild" coming right around the corner in a shrewd counter-programming summer release slot, hot off festival kudos at Sundance and Cannes. Many are expecting it to be a big Oscar play for Searchlight, but there's the studio's other Sundance pick-up, "Six Sessions" (née "The Surrogate"), set for latter year release and potentially more viable. Oh, and who knows if they'll be in business with Terrence Malick again for "To the Wonder," and if it will make it out this year (I'm currently running on an assumption that it will)?
Regardless, it might be wise for Searchlight to pay attention to how "Marigold" is being received by those who have a vote.
Parent 20th Century Fox also has some things to work with this year, namely Ridley Scott's sci-fi prequel "Prometheus" and Ang Lee's "Life of Pi." Footage of the latter is being attached to 3D prints of the former in an interesting strategy to raise awareness in the wake of a very successful CinemaCon reveal in April. There's also "Won't Back Down," which could be a performance play for last year's near winner Viola Davis and co-star Maggie Gyllenhaal.
Disney will have, in addition to its two sides of the box office spectrum ("John Carter" and "The Avengers"), one of the year's perceived frontrunners: Steven Spielberg's "Lincoln." But no one wants to be chalked up as a frontrunner this early (even if "War Horse" pulled it off by a nose last season after being in a similar position). There's also "Brave" from Pixar and in-house animated efforts "Frankenweenie" and "Wreck-It Ralph."
The aforementioned "Anna Karenina" is looking like a big play for Focus Features, along with "Moonrise Kingdom" and the animated "ParaNorman." The ensemble from "Hyde Park on Hudson," fronted by Bill Murray doing his best FDR, could be additional leverage. This or that could pop up in addition from the company, but for now, it's a pretty straightforward line-up.
Related
-
The Contenders 2012
The year's first charts
-
The Long Shot: Searching for sleepers in the Oscar guessing game
What's this year's little engine that could?
Paramount Pictures has been in it in a big way the last few years. In the post-Vantage era, multiple campaigns per year have been the norm. This year, though, save maybe some performance considerations for "The Guilt Trip," some crafts pushes for "Jack Reacher" and a serious animated campaign with DreamWorks on "Rise of the Guardians," there's just one major film in sight: Robert Zemeckis's "Flight."
I've offered this up as a potential below-the-radar contender already, but at the very least perhaps stars Denzel Washington and Kelly Reilly will find support. And a lengthy airline crash sequence could pique the interests of the sound and visual effects branches. Regardless, it's a pretty slim and streamlined slate for Paramount this year.
The complete opposite of a slim and streamlined slate? Warner Bros., which is bringing on added firepower in the form of successful Oscar strategist Cynthia Swartz (who spearheaded campaigns for "Crash," "No Country for Old Men" and "The Hurt Locker") to assist long-time WB strategist Michele Robertson with a heavy load.
Hopes will be high for Christopher Nolan's Batman denouement "The Dark Knight Rises" after "The Dark Knight" was such a fixture (though ultimate Best Picture snubee) in the 2008 Oscar season. Also on the blockbuster side of things is Peter Jackson's "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey," which has some big shoes to fill as well after each film in the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy saw major awards success.
Scaling back a bit, but still big and bold, we have Baz Luhrmann's "The Great Gatsby," which might not even be an awards play at the end of the day. After all, the director's only real brush with Oscar was "Moulin Rouge!" over a decade ago. Nevertheless, the film appears to be a design showcase.
My hunch, though, is that, with all this heavy firepower, little, unassuming "Argo" -- from director Ben Affleck -- is going to look like something special. There's also the Clint Eastwood starrer "Trouble with the Curve," Steven Soderbergh's "Magic Mike" and genre fare galore. And who knows if "Cloud Atlas" will release and be a player?
After a bit of a drought, Universal will finally be sporting a contender with meat on its bones in the form of Tom Hooper's "The King's Speech" follow-up, "Les Misérables." Much like "War Horse" last year, the sight-unseen heavy launched a summer teaser to get the conversation going. Meanwhile, the studio will also have things like "The Bourne Legacy" and Judd Apatow's "This is 40" to play with. Who knows about Oliver Stone's "Savages," which has one of the more headache-inducing trailers out there (in my humble opinion)?
Summit Entertainment might have a pair of sleeper possibilities in Stephen Chbosky's self-adapted "The Perks of Being a Wallflower" and Juan Antonio Bayona's "The Impossible," both of which are stirring positive word. A Lionsgate merger brings "The Hunger Games" into that fold, but, again, I think major awards consideration for that young adult phenom go a bit too far.
Looking out over some of the smaller companies out there, IFC Films will be taking "On the Road" into the season with a full-on campaign for awards after bowing it at Cannes, while Magnolia Pictures has things like Sundance documentary premiere "The Queen of Versailles" and Sarah Polley's "Take This Waltz." Millennium Entertainment ("Bernie"), Oscilloscope Pictures ("Wuthering Heights") and CBS Films ("Seven Psychopaths," "The Words") all have campaigns to play with, depending on what kind of money they want to spend. And Sony Pictures Classics will have a typically big and varied slate, Michael Haneke's Palme d'Or winner "Amour" joining the likes of "Rust and Bone" and "West of Memphis," among others.
Speaking of Sony, there's big Sony, which has had a busy couple of seasons between "The Social Network," "The Ides of March" and "Moneyball." They slid on past a potential disaster with "Men in Black III" this summer and have "The Amazing Spider-Man" set for next month, but Kathryn Bigelow's bin Laden hunt thriller "Zero Dark Thirty" will be a heavily anticipated title later in the year.
Finally, there's our returning champion: The Weinstein Company. Harvey had a pretty big presence at Cannes this year, even if he didn't walk away with a story like "The Artist" to carry him into the season. "Lawless" and "Killing Them Softly" each landed, well, softly, and he picked up the lightweight "The Sapphires" for a potential push, as well as Dustin Hoffman's directorial debut, "Quartet."
However, two auteurs in Quentin Tarantino ("Django Unchained") and Paul Thomas Anderson ("The Master") lie ahead yet. A lot of talk about David O. Russell's "The Silver Linings Playbook" is coming out of the company, too, but who knows what kind of misdirection is afoot. The trick in an awards season these days is to keep people looking the other way, because if they see you coming, they could talk you to death.
Guilty.
Now, who knows which of these could fall off the 2012 map and take a seat until next year? And who knows what is lurking, waiting for a soft spot in the schedule? Things that are filming or recently wrapped are always worth keeping an eye on, whether it's Scott Cooper's "Out of the Furnace" from Relativity, Sacha Gervasi's "Hitchcock" from Searchlight or this and that from Focus and Universal (we'll see on those).
Then there are any number of films awaiting acquisition that could be latter year spoilers, the most attractive of those being Mike Newell's "Great Expectations," Shari Berman and Robert Pulcini's "Imogene," Jeff Nichols's "Mud" and James Gray's "Lowlife."
But I think the above is plenty to chew on for now.
So with that foundation laid, Guy and I have put our heads together to crank out the year's first set of Oscar predictions, which can be found in the right sidebar, per usual. The Contenders section has also been re-populated with ranked list of 30 contenders in every -- yes, every -- Oscar category. Well, save the handful of fields that need a few more layers stripped away before we can really start analyzing them. Guy has also offered up his opening salvo for the new season, searching for those little engines that could.
Please don't take all of this too seriously. We're just knocking the ice off the windshield here. We haven't even cranked the car. The season is still a few months off and we won't update these considerably until just before the starting gun in late August, so for now, consider this a setting of the field. We'll get back to it all in due time.
For year-round entertainment news and awards season commentary follow @kristapley on Twitter.
Sign up for Instant Alerts from In Contention!
Trending Now on HitFix Boards
| Topic | Started By | Latest Post | Replies |
|---|---|---|---|
| DarylRichardson |
3 months ago
|
1
|
|
| gregel |
7 months ago
|
9
|
|
| Discuss Oscars on HitFix Message Boards » | |||
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Jim Jarmusch is on typically deadpan form in mildly amusing vampire filmSaturday, May 25, 2013
-
Audiences revisit Celine and Jesse this weekendFriday, May 24, 2013
-
Marion Cotillard and Joaquin Phoenix play out a bad romance in 1920s-set dramaFriday, May 24, 2013
-
Matthias Schoenaerts the ensemble standout in overlong period thrillerFriday, May 24, 2013








Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup- 1
- 2
Next 178 CommentsMatthew Starr
June 11, 2012 at 1:48PM EST Reply to CommentI loathed Marigold Hotel which is saying something because I love the cast.
What I find interesting about this year is that hardly any notable films came out of Cannes or Sundance. Last year there was Tree of Life, The Artist, Drive, We Need to Talk About Kevin, MMMM, Take Shelter and Berlin had A Separation.
This time last year I was already itching to see all those films (TOL I had seen by now), but this year I am not really itching to see anything that has played the fests. I'm interested in Beasts, Amour and Holy Motors but not to extent I was for say Drive and MMMM. It just seems like there is a lot less buzz at this point than a year ago.
Perhaps this means studios are saving the best for last and that Venice/Telluride/Toronto/NY will be stacked with contenders?
Liz I wouldn't say I loathed Marigold Hotel, but I did dislike it, and the idea of it being an Oscar player (even though it makes a lot of sense) dismays me greatly.
June 11, 2012 at 2:03PM ESTMatthew Starr I highly doubt it will be a contender at all.
June 11, 2012 at 2:18PM ESTCaptainCanada I think it's a very pleasant film, but I have a hard time seeing it as an awards contender. If the female acting categories end up being lighter than normal, perhaps.
June 11, 2012 at 5:19PM ESTKevin
June 11, 2012 at 1:50PM EST Reply to CommentThanks for the early look Kris. With all the heft behind Skyfall, could you see that potentially getting some notices?
d2 judging by what i saw from the trailer (usually a big mistake, but here maybe not so much?) - the cinematography looks f*cking gorgeous. Is this Deakins' year at long last?
June 12, 2012 at 3:27PM ESTMatthew Starr
June 11, 2012 at 2:02PM EST Reply to CommentAlso, a face off between DDL, John Hawkes and PSH would be awesome.
Liz
June 11, 2012 at 2:05PM EST Reply to CommentDoes the Coens' new one, Inside Llewyn Davies, have a distributor yet? I know they were making it independently.
IMDb says it's a 2013 release, but considering that the film's been in production for several months, and knowing how fast the Coens work, I would be surprised if it didn't get a 2012 release.
Jonnybon I'm sure it will be released this year.
June 11, 2012 at 3:13PM ESTJuanL
June 11, 2012 at 2:20PM EST Reply to CommentIt's interesting that you include "Up from Poppy Hill" in the animated list. I didn't think it was getting a release this year (most places list it as a 2013 US release), but GKids likes to have qualifying releases for its animated films the fall before. This could be a contender. I read about GKids handling the theatrical releases of the new Ghibli films, which makes me wonder if they will give them any larger releases than the miniscule ones that films such as Chico and Rita and a Cat in Paris have.
Also, what do you think of Sean Penn's chances for "This Must Be The Place"? Weinstein still has not announced a release date for the film. I feel the film is a dead horse at this point, but maybe Guy would have more to say about it, since I think he saw it at Cannes last year.
Guy Lodge Sean Penn's chances for This Must Be the Place? Non-existent, to put it briefly. He'd need critics all the way behind him to stand the slimmest of chances for such an eccentric (and not terribly good) film, and the performance itself is pretty divisive.
June 11, 2012 at 2:29PM ESTKristopher Tapley GKIDS actually announced plans last week to qualify it so it's good to go.
June 11, 2012 at 2:47PM ESTLiz
June 11, 2012 at 2:22PM EST Reply to CommentIf I had to put money on any movie for a Best Picture nomination right at this moment, I would go with Argo. It just seems to tick off all the right boxes (and I don't mean that in a rote, cynical way), timing seems perfect for Ben Affleck, good trailer, etc.
Anything can happen, of course. But that's where my money would be, at least for a nomination.
Mr.F
June 11, 2012 at 2:24PM EST Reply to CommentHas it been confirmed that Fox Searchlight picked up To the Wonder? There's nothing on IMDB and I don't remember anything being announced, and I imagine that would be a pretty big deal.
Kristopher Tapley No, not confirmed.
June 11, 2012 at 2:50PM ESTthekingbulletin
June 11, 2012 at 2:28PM EST Reply to CommentWilkinson gives the best performance in "Marigold."
Joe
June 11, 2012 at 2:32PM EST Reply to CommentNo Anne Hathaway in the top 5 for Les Miserables??? I'm pretty sure she's gonna be a major contender. Same with Laura Dern and Amy Adams from The Master.
Guy Lodge I think Samantha Barks might be the "Les Mis" lady to watch. Great role, and the fact that they retained her from the stage production instead of casting a star suggests to me that she may be something special.
June 11, 2012 at 2:38PM ESTJonnybon She is.
June 11, 2012 at 3:15PM ESTCaptainCanada Since we generally need two nominees from the same film in that category, If "Les Mis" is at all good, I think both Hathaway and Barks could get in.
June 11, 2012 at 5:14PM ESTJJ1 Samantha Barks was very good in the stage production of Les Miserables. It's a meaty role. But I agree with others that this looks like a huge potential nom for Hathaway.
June 11, 2012 at 5:38PM ESTThe Great Dane The role Barks plays won the Tony. It's the best female role in the story (and has some of the best songs), so just by casting an unknown screams of them trying to get to a "A STAR IS BORN!" type of thing a la Jennifer Hudson. Barks is the one to watch, but Hathaway on the other hand also has a career to back her up. They would want to award her for something, and this seems like the obvious choice. She ticks ALL the boxes: SPOILERS!! Prostitute, (single) mother, death, singing, cutting/shaving off her real hair. Watch out! If Crowe AND Barks get nominated alongside Jackman and Hathaway (and if the movie is a big hit AND a good movie), we could be looking at a record-breaking 15 nominations. Picture, director, actor, 2 x supporting actress, supporting actor, screenplay, cinematography, editing, original song, art direction, costumes, sound, sound editing, makeup = 15. Bonham Carter or Seyfried could make it (oh God!) 16 (not likely). It actually doesn't seem so far-fetched. At least, it's DESTINED to break the Globe record (which is a "humble" 8 by Cold Mountain, if I remember correctly). Globes could even put Hathaway in Best Actress, just to get Seyfried or Bonham Carter in there as well.
June 12, 2012 at 3:19AM ESTGuy Lodge Personally, I'd bet money that Les Mis isn't going to break any records.
June 12, 2012 at 6:54AM ESTOh, and I hate myself for knowing this, but the record for most Golden Globe nominations is shared by Nashville and Cabaret, with nine each. (Several films share the runner-up tally of eight, including Titanic, Chicago, Bugsy and, yes, Cold Mountain.)
JJ1 God only knows how Les Miserables will be. Or what reviews/box office it can get. Such a large undertaking. Such a possibility for success or failure in equal measure.
June 12, 2012 at 9:28AM ESTBut I see what The Great Dane is alluding to in that Les Miserables certainly has the highest potential for nominations. It's one of THOSE movies. If Hooper is able to nail it (I'm cautiously optimistic), then watch out.
Side note: I friggin' love Cold Mountain.
Jonnybon I would just like to add the the friggin Cold Mountain love.
June 12, 2012 at 12:26PM ESTZack
June 11, 2012 at 2:37PM EST Reply to CommentObviously it's too early for you to have airtight reasoning behind any of these, but I'm just curious: what, if anything, made you keep Murray out of your Best Actor predictions? Are you just figuring they won't nominate two different presidents?
Kristopher Tapley No real reason, honestly. Just feeling it out.
June 11, 2012 at 2:51PM ESTBill_the_Bear My problem with Murray (going by the trailer) is that he isn't making the slightest attempt to sound anything like FDR, who, of course, had one of the most distinctive voices in American political history.
June 12, 2012 at 9:23AM ESTJJ1 Murray looks like a surefire nominee on paper, but not-so-much in the trailer or in reality. It seems like a wait-and-see performance.
June 12, 2012 at 9:31AM ESTred_wine
June 11, 2012 at 3:03PM EST Reply to CommentArgo looked like shit to me. I wonder if that would happen. Its the third Affleck picture being buzzed for major awards with no prior success at all.
I think the techs are easier to predict. I think cinematography/editing for Master, score for Lincoln, costumes/sets for Gatsby, cinematography for Dark Knight, cinematography for Django are all sure bets.
Amour would have to storm the critics awards to have as much of a good chance as you guys are giving it. Les Mis looked very cheesy to me. Karenina will have to see, never been impressed so far with Joe Wright. And the Malick film will need the blanket acclaim that Tree Of Life received to get in. Even Tree of Life barely got in.
JJ1 Argo doesn't look like my type of movie. But the trailer certainly makes it look like a player this year.
June 11, 2012 at 5:44PM ESTNate
June 11, 2012 at 3:18PM EST Reply to CommentDo you think Fox will push hard for Michael Fassbender to get a supporting actor nomination for Prometheus? He is really is the best thing about the movie.
JJ1 It is very Supporting Actor nom-ish. But yeah, it's early in the year. They'd have to push hard during the "season", I would think.
June 11, 2012 at 5:46PM ESTGlennAU It'd be weird if this was the first film to get Fassbender a nomination. Unless he also had another performance in the mix, a more typically Oscar-ish lead role for instance (ala Jamie Foxx with "Ray" and "Collateral"), I can't see them going for it.
June 12, 2012 at 1:10AM ESTDooby Guys, come on. No way is this happening.
June 12, 2012 at 1:23AM ESTJJ1 ^ Oh no, I agree. I'm just saying that if the film made a but of a bigger impact and/or came out later in the year (in the "season"), I could see a case for a push for a nom.
June 12, 2012 at 9:34AM ESTDooby Agreed. I would definitely have been considering it if this had received the extremely positive reception people thought it would based on the excellent promotional campaign.
June 12, 2012 at 5:22PM ESTAdam
June 11, 2012 at 3:40PM EST Reply to CommentI really assumed when I saw 21 comments already that we'd have a few crying foul over TDKR and The Hobbit being left out of major categories on the updated predictions. Although I will say, both being left out of Cinematography and Art Direction makes me scratch my head a little.
JJ1 Regardless of those 2 films' quality, I would also think that they should be in the mix for Cin and Art D. But ... there are some very potentially-strong looking films coming out at the end of the year that could just sweep-in and take those category slots with no problem. I'm guessing that is the reason for this early trepidation.
June 12, 2012 at 9:40AM ESTJFK
June 11, 2012 at 3:40PM EST Reply to CommentKris, I'm curious as to why both you and Guy have "The Perks of Being a Wallflower" listed across the board. Have you heard something specific about this that suggests it might stand a part? Also, "Zero Dark Thirty" is now Untitled again and I don't believe James Gray confirmed "Lowlife."
DylanS
June 11, 2012 at 3:41PM EST Reply to CommentKris: I read the "Django Unchained" script, and I view Christoph Waltz as being s double lead with Jamie Foxx. I could see a campaign trying to push him as supporting to avoid competition with Foxx, but I think it would be dubious, as it's a hell of a role for Waltz again. Unless the film is edited in a completely different way from the script (which is a possibility with Tarantino), I'd say he's a lead.
DylanS I realize now that should've been directed at Guy, as he's listed Waltz under his supporting contenders.
June 11, 2012 at 4:18PM ESTGuy Lodge I don't read scripts. I'll bear your thoughts in mind, and wait it out.
June 11, 2012 at 4:34PM ESTJasper
June 11, 2012 at 4:03PM EST Reply to CommentI feel like Quartet is a baity one to watch. The cast, A-list director, premise, and Weinstein support make it seem like something that would be right up the Academy's ally.
Guy Lodge Surely there's a difference between an "A-list director" and an A-list star making his directorial debut?
June 11, 2012 at 4:35PM ESTDylanS actually Guy, I'm not sure the Academy sees a difference. They certainly didn't with Redford or Costner. ;)
June 11, 2012 at 4:43PM ESTMatthew Starr or Mel Gibson
June 11, 2012 at 5:00PM ESTCasey Fiore
June 11, 2012 at 4:43PM EST Reply to CommentInteresting predictions altogether. A lot of people are high on the possibility of Affleck in the Director spot right now. Is that due to some good word floating around the biz or just that he's a well liked guy who is gaining a lot of respect as a rising director?
Also, I can't say I understand Russell Crowe in the lead category...? Surely it would be easier for both he and the studio to campaign him supporting aside of Hugh Jackman, and honestly I think it would be difficult to argue that Javert is a co-lead role. Actually I think Crowe stands as good a chance as any to win Supporting
Kristopher Tapley Never underestimate ego.
June 11, 2012 at 5:03PM ESTCasey Fiore Haha duly noted. On another note, is a lone director for Haneke really that likely considering how seemingly easily the field opened to 9 last year from what most predicted to be 7 or so, or does the film have a shot at best picture as well as sort of a reverse coattails for Haneke votes?
June 11, 2012 at 6:15PM ESTGuy Lodge I see Valjean and Javert very much as co-lead roles -- and incidentally, the actors from the original musical were nominated as such at the Tony Awards. There's such a surfeit of inarguable supporting roles in the film that it'd be crowded either way.
June 11, 2012 at 8:12PM ESTAlso, I addressed the lone director question in the comments beneath my Long Shot piece, but I don't quite follow what the size of last year's field has to do with it. The directors determine the Best Director nominees, simple as that. Most of the time, obviously, their picks come from the field of presumed Best Picture contenders, but once in a blue moon, one of their nominees does not.
In any event, as Kris's chart suggests, Amour does indeed have a shot at a Best Picture nod.
Casey Fiore It's been a while since I've seen it on stage but I've always thought of it as Valjean's story. I could be wrong.
June 11, 2012 at 10:27PM ESTIn reference to last year's field, what I mean to say is that generally it's presumed that the lone director nomination is given to a film that was only a place or two out of the top 5 best pictures (Greengrass-2006, Schnabel-2007), if it were the case that 9 films were nominated for best picture, what used to be a lone director nomination would more than likely now just be a paired BP-BD. I suppose I'm questioning the legitimacy of the idea of a lone director spot altogether
Guy Lodge "generally it's presumed that the lone director nomination is given to a film that was only a place or two out of the top 5 best pictures"
June 12, 2012 at 6:59AM ESTThat's definitely not always the case. Vera Drake? Talk to Her? Three Colours Red? The Last Temptation of Christ? Mulholland Drive? Woman in the Dunes?
Casey Fiore Fair point. Shoulda fact checked.
June 12, 2012 at 9:15AM ESTAl
June 11, 2012 at 5:03PM EST Reply to CommentI'm seeing Les Miserables, Dark Knight Rises, Django, and The Master as our major players. I also expect, to a lesser extent though, a nice showing for Gatsby and Lincoln. Brave, Pi, and Beasts are three I'm not too sure on.
Obviously this is based on, well, nothing substantial. Its just fun guessing.
JJ1
June 11, 2012 at 6:02PM EST Reply to CommentI feel like - due to only a couple of films jumping out from the festivals, so far - that this could be a BIG movie year. Big meaning major studios: Les Mis, Lincoln, Hobbit, TDKR, Avengers, Django, The Master, maybe Gatsby (doubtful). I mean, I know that the good indies will pop-up. It's just been curiously quiet, thus far.
Also, about Marigold Hotel. I never thought about it as an Oscar player in any category. But seeing Dench in Supporting makes good sense. She has that unfortunate degenerative eye sight illness (could be goodwill for her). The studio could push if they want (movie made tons of $$). She's good in the role. And everyone loves a Dench. Thing is, it nears category fraud, cause she's clearly the biggest character of the large ensemble.
My opinion of the movie was that it was pleasant, but quite underdeveloped. It probably deserved a 3 hour running time, but that would never happen. So things felt rushed. The cast was very good, though.
Laura Stewart How is Gatsby not big? It has a major studio behind it, Leonardo DiCaprio playing a romantic lead, and familiar source material... not to mention what will likely be a killer marketing campaign and the "director of Moulin Rouge" behind it? I think it will be fine and I'm anticipating lots of Oscars :) (yes it will be my Young Adult of this awards season)
June 11, 2012 at 11:42PM ESTGuy Lodge Maybe wait to see the film before declaring it your season-long cause? ;)
June 12, 2012 at 7:09AM ESTAnd JJ1's "doubtful" obvious refers to the film's awards potential, not its scale -- which is undeniable.
JJ1 Correct ^. Thank you, Guy. That is what I meant.
June 12, 2012 at 9:44AM ESTAnd yes Laura, Gatsby looks to be your Young Adult for 2012, haha. But I was right there pulling for that film and Charlize with ya.
Mykill I remember our prayer circles for Charlize Theron and Michael Fassbender last season... What a bummer neither turned out to pull through. Maybe our luck will change this year though? :^)
June 12, 2012 at 10:53AM ESTPaul Outlaw Gatsby, if done right, is not a romantic lead...
June 12, 2012 at 9:35PM ESTGuy Lodge ^^ This.
June 13, 2012 at 8:06AM ESTArty
June 11, 2012 at 7:43PM EST Reply to CommentUniversal's take on Anna Karenina is not an expansive period epic but a mid-budget chamber piece. I don't know whether that informs or affects your expectations for its awards prospects, but I've got to admit it lowers mine!
JJ1 If Anna Karenina is actually, you know, good (haha) ... I could see pic, dir, knightley, writing, cin, art d, cost, original score happening. It's just such a crapshoot now, as it is for nearly everything.
June 11, 2012 at 7:54PM ESTDooby Chamber piece?? Have you read ANYTHING about the direction it's taking? It sounds like a very creative approach to a traditional period film.
June 12, 2012 at 1:28AM ESTd2 Two words: Albert. Nobbs. Best Picture contender not so much, but surely an actor's vehicle...?
June 12, 2012 at 3:33PM ESTDooby LOL which one of Wright's previous films serves as a precedent for this to end up being like Albert Nobbs? Give me a break.
June 12, 2012 at 5:25PM ESTArty AK was good to go as a period epic but Universal slashed the budget. Joe Wright was then forced to pitch again for a film without big outdoor sequences and shooting most scenes on a sound stage dressed as a theatre. Cost motivated these changes - not creative. That said, there is certainly no precedent or reason for this film to resemble Albert Nobbs.
June 12, 2012 at 7:15PM ESTJMC
June 11, 2012 at 9:06PM EST Reply to CommentI think, if Fox Searchlight wants it, Best Exotic Marigold has a good of a chance as any for a Best Picture nomination, not to mention some acting attention, despite the loathe from some on here. I admit my bias since I adored the film (as well as everyone I know). That said, everyone I know who watched it is above 50, i.e., Academy demo, anyone? If Fox Searchlight pushes it, I think they're bound to get a Best Picture-Comedy nomination (if they push it as comedy) at the Globes. If it's in Comedy, it may getting a lot of acting noms too, potentially making it one of the most nominated films at the Globes. Globes are meaningless, but buzz is not. Secondly, the film may be a big hit at BAFTAs, for obvious reasons. Soooo...combine a film that plays on both sides of the pond with well respected actors (many of whom are Academy members themselves), throw in a good box office, and voila.
That aside, I'm personally watching out for "Flight." Not going to discount Zemeckis, especially with the attention it'll get as his return to live action.
That said, everything else, sight unseen, who knows, but I'm personally most looking forward to "The Master." Performance-wise, color me excited about FDR Bill Murray.
So, sight seen, and with success already in hand, don't bet against "Exotic Marigold."
JMC Oh, and, have to think, after a heartbreaking loss last year, Viola Davis will be in the running if the film and performance are good. (Little doubt about the latter.)
June 11, 2012 at 9:13PM ESTJMC
June 11, 2012 at 9:17PM EST Reply to CommentKris, since you mention the Marigold Hotel love, any reason Tom Wilkinson is not in your top 30 for Supporting? I agree Nighy's more likely, but I'd think Wilkinson has a, be it remote, chance, with the emotional nature of his character. Also, I just get the hunch they give kudo points for playing LGBT characters, unfair as that may be.
Kristopher Tapley That'd be Guy's territory.
June 11, 2012 at 10:22PM ESTJMC Ah, sorry. Forgot to notice Guy's name notation in The Contender's section.
June 11, 2012 at 10:28PM ESTGuy Lodge An oversight. I'll add him at some point, though I'm loath to give that film too much chart space.
June 12, 2012 at 7:12AM ESTcinejab
June 11, 2012 at 10:19PM EST Reply to CommentI'm kind of alarmed by your inclusion of Nina Dobrev as a contender for Perks, but not Emma Watson (unless I'm missing something). Not that I really expect a whole lot of awards attention for the film.
Marko
June 11, 2012 at 10:48PM EST Reply to CommentCloud Atlas has a scheduled release date of December 6, and from what I've heard about it, it could at least be a contender in the makeup category.
JLPatt
June 11, 2012 at 10:53PM EST Reply to CommentIs there a way Desplat's "Moonrise Kingdom" score could possibly be eligible? Considering the Academy's incredibly stingy rules lately, I have a hard time believing such a small (17 minutes) suite surrounded by tons of pre-existing classical and folk music would be allowed by them.
gregel
June 12, 2012 at 12:36AM EST Reply to CommentI cannot believe John Carter will get nominated for best visual effects. I don't think the committee will go there.
JJ1 I'm not sure John Carter will get anything at this point. That film's history is such a disaster; which is a shame, because I actually liked it on some level. The best aspect of it were the special effects though, for sure. And it's not like big box office bombs haven't gotten nominated before.
June 12, 2012 at 9:49AM ESTGlennAU
June 12, 2012 at 1:06AM EST Reply to CommentHaven't read any of the comments so forgive any overlap:
I take it "Six Sessions" is the new title for "The Surrogate". Probably for the best.
I've never seen the "Les Miserables" (I feel sorry for anybody who is going to use the accented e for the entire season), but is there any way the studio can legitimately place Anne Hathaway in the lead category. Seems like something they'd do and could easily get away with (even a win if she's good enough) despite her really being a supporting player.
As much as I love her, I doubt Jacki Weaver - an old, Australian lady that nobody knew about before last year - can get a second nomination. Don't most acting nominees only ever get one (Nathaniel Rogers knows the stats on this!)
I can't imagine "Anna Karenina" getting a Best Picture nomination without a corresponding Best Actress nomination, but maybe it won't get either? Also... Jude Law... Jaw... Keira Knightley's Jaw... hmmm.
That costume design category looks PHENOMENAL!
Interesting that you don't have Bill Murray for "Hyde Park", but do have Olivia Williams. I'd say if they're gonna go for one they'll go for both. But, that movie looks terrible so maybe they'll go neither? Oh gosh, I dunno.
No "Prometheus" for Visual Effects? Just furthering my belief that this is the "Tron: Legacy" on 2012. Except I really like this one.
Guy Lodge Hathaway's character, Fantine, dies in the very first act of 'Les Mis' -- before anyone complains, that's too early to count as a spoiler -- so I'm struggling to see how the studio could spin a lead campaign out of that one.
June 12, 2012 at 7:20AM ESTAs for your Anna Karenina query, that's where the disjoint shows with Kris and I managing different categories. I wouldn't have it in my Best Picture lineup, while Kris would include Knightley in Best Actress. Compromise!
JJ1 Right. Fantine is out fairly early in the play. But she is an extremely strong presence in that first Act. And I wouldn't be surprised if her presence wasn't made known at various spurts throughout (by Hooper), if he intends on spinning her as a potential nominee.
June 12, 2012 at 9:52AM ESTGuy Lodge I like to think that Hooper is more concerned with telling a story than spinning potential nominees. That's the studio's job.
June 12, 2012 at 2:04PM ESTd2 they did it with Viola Davis and The Help...
June 12, 2012 at 3:36PM ESTBJT Of the 881 Actors and Actresses to receive Oscars nods (bearing in mind I may have added a couple of specials by mistake) 563 (64%) never got a second bite at the cherry.
June 12, 2012 at 4:24PM ESTAlthough the average number of nominations per actor is 2 (or possibly more if I cleansed my specials) so you could argue either way on the point.
Guy Lodge D2: You're right -- I totally forgot that Aibileen Clark dies in the first act of The Help.
June 12, 2012 at 8:06PM ESTGlenn and BJT: I just don't understand the relevance of this point. So 64% of nominated actors don't get another nod. But 36% do. What reason is that to bet against anything?
GlennAU Aah, I was unaware of Fantine's fate. I'm also not dumb enough to think a property that well known deserves spoiler tags so no worry there.
June 12, 2012 at 11:15PM ESTGuy, it's not necessarily that there's much to be made from the stat, but someone like Weaver doesn't immediately strike me as somebody the Academy are going to be clamouring to nominate again so soon. Meh.
BJT Sorry Guy, was simply providing the Stats as the question was asked. As with all statistical analysis it means nothing in an individual case and I wouldn't use it to form an argument except at a much broader level.
June 13, 2012 at 12:10AM ESTBut personally I'd never be able to do such a extensive job of predictions so I tip my hat off to you.
Cde.
June 12, 2012 at 2:02AM EST Reply to CommentI'm surprised by the total absence of Cloud Atlas mentions in The Contenders, especially since it's mentioned in the article. I expect it will be too weird to play for the major categories, but the multiple period settings and century-spanning scope should surely at least make it a dark horse for art direction, costume design and visual effects. The one category where it seems likely to be a major player is makeup. Impressions suggest that the transformative prosthetics used on the cast throughout are really wild in concept and complex in execution.
Also...I haven't seen Beasts of the Southern Wild, but is it possibly a long (long) shot for visual effects?
Kristopher Tapley I'm not entirely sure it'll be released. I mean, Warner Bros. is slammed as it is.
June 12, 2012 at 2:46PM ESTCde. WB just announced it for October 26.
June 19, 2012 at 11:31PM ESTCde.
June 12, 2012 at 2:06AM EST Reply to CommentAnother suggestion: Skyfall (Roger Deakins) for cinematography. Yes, it's a Bond film, but it's Deakins and the trailer showed some stunning imagery.
d2 Yes!
June 12, 2012 at 3:37PM ESTCde.
June 12, 2012 at 2:24AM EST Reply to CommentOh, and one more thing... Phoenix will go lead for The Master, Hoffman supporting.
Kristopher Tapley Says who? I hope you're not basing that on the trailer, which was built in a willfully nebulous fashion.
June 12, 2012 at 2:47PM ESTd2 CDE., you know what they're doing, right? Yes, they're showcasing Joaquin Phoenix early on to boost his Oscar chances, but it's a slow marketing build that will end with a big reveal of Hoffman's lead character
June 12, 2012 at 3:39PM ESTCde. I haven't read the script, but those who have pretty consistently indicate that Phoenix's character is the lead. Category fraud is possible, but the teaser hints toward a pretty showy performance, so I don't know why they'd do that.
June 12, 2012 at 5:20PM EST- 1
- 2
Next 178 Comments