My favorite Oscar nomination: Eiko Ishioka for 'Mirror Mirror'
The Japanese costume genius received her second nod a year after her death
A selection of Eiko Ishioka's spectacular threads from "Mirror Mirror."
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Perhaps not everyone feels this way, but I’ve always seen a gratifying kind of dignity in films nominated for a single Academy Award. Granted, for some contenders it can be a disappointing underachievement. For other, more marginalized films, however, it can be a heartening sign of individual voting branches paying careful attention to work that excelled in their own craft, and not just rubber-stamping the buzz-hogging juggernauts.
Think “House of Flying Daggers” cracking the Best Cinematography race in 2004, or “Dancer in the Dark” copping a nod for its haunting signature song (and making Oscar nominees of both Bjork and Lars von Trier in the process). The most rewarding Oscar years are often those with the most individual films nominated across all categories, and comparatively little overlap between disciplines.
This year’s lineup, though on balance a strong one, offers comparatively few such lone-wolf nominees. In the below-the-line races, usually conducive to the singling out of otherwise unloved titles, we have a mere half-dozen across only four categories: Visual Effects, Makeup, Original Song and Costume Design. And it’s the last of these – Eiko Ishioka’s posthumous nomination for the unheralded March release “Mirror Mirror” – that ranks as my single favorite nomination of the year.
The Academy’s costume branch has form in this regard: more than any of their peers, they have a habit of recognizing remarkable work in little-hyped (and sometimes little-liked) releases. It’s thanks to them that such recent films as “Jane Eyre,” “Bright Star,” “W.E.,” “Australia,” “Across the Universe” and “Troy” can indelibly go down in history as Oscar nominees – and if not all those titles seem exactly worthy of that status in and of themselves, that’s precisely why the voters deserve credit for remembering them. “W.E.” may be a terrible film, for example, but that shouldn’t discolor one’s appreciation of Arianne Phillips’s genuinely inspired sartorial contribution.
For some, the tepidly reviewed “Mirror Mirror” may fall into the “that got an Oscar nomination?” bracket. But you already know my feelings about Tarsem’s dizzy spun-sugar reimagination of the Snow White fairytale: I grooved to its sincere silliness and acrylic beauty enough to place it in my top 10 of 2012. I’m happy to see the film rewarded in any capacity, but thrilled that it’s for the work of Ishioka, whose singularly eye-popping sartorial creations have been an integral component of Tarsem’s own auteur brand across four features together. The director himself acknowledged as much in his formal response to the nomination:
Related
-
Costume designer Eiko Ishioka's fantastic farewell in 'Mirror Mirror'
Is a posthumous Oscar on the cards?
“Eiko was unique -- a true visionary. She designed all aspects of a wardrobe, never taking a short cut and working tirelessly to make each and every piece stand alone. I hope this deserved nomination not only reminds the world of her whimsical and spectacular work on 'Mirror Mirror,' but [ensures] they will remember her countless and unforgettable contributions to filmmaking.”
Ishioka, who passed away last January at the age of 73, wasn’t just a film costume designer: her long and varied list of career achievements as an all-purpose visual artist includes directing music videos for the likes of Bjork, winning a Grammy Award for graphic design work on a Miles Davis album, and clothing the opening ceremony of the 2008 Beijing Olympics. But it’s in the discipline of cinematic costume that her wild imagination and excitingly unhinged visual sensibility produced arguably their loveliest, and certainly their most enduring, work.
She had already won an Oscar – one of the most deserved in the category’s history, for my money – for the sexy, stylized, richly color-coded wardrobe of Francis Ford Coppola’s ”Bram Stoker’s Dracula,” when Tarsem came calling for his dream-styled psychological thriller “The Cell” in 2000. But her most unfettered creativity is to be found in her collaborations with the Indian director whose vision matched hers for extravagance and eccentricity. The sculptural S&M-inspired constructions for “The Cell,” the deep-hued collage of ethnic exotica in “The Fall,” the sexualized, gold-dusted interpretations of sword-and-sandal dress in “Immortals” – all beautiful and bonkers in equal measure, and all deserving of a second Oscar nod that only came her way last week.
Still, if it could only be for one of them, I’m glad it was for “Mirror Mirror” – and not just for the sentimental, career-capping aptness of the gesture. At the time of the film’s release, I devoted an article to the film’s costumes, but it bears repeating just how weird and witty and intricately conceived they are, twisting the puffed sleeves and hoop skirts of Eurocentric storybook illustrations with rococo references, samurai accents and an aggressive primary color palette. (It’s a pleasing bit of symmetry that Ishioka is nominated alongside three-time winner Colleen Atwood’s similarly gutsy, but tonally opposite, sartorial revision of the very same story in “Snow White and the Huntsman.”)
The billowing, atypically mustard-hued cape in which Snow White ventures into the woods, the marshmallow-colored, whimsically animal-themed ensembles at the palace ball, the Gaultier-esque galleons adorning the heads of the Wicked Queen’s live chess pieces, the electric-blue-and-orange pop adaptation of Disney’s iconic Snow White dress in the final sequence, an affectionate nod to tradition – these are all images that have stayed in my head over the last 10 months, and I’m glad they clearly made the same impression on the costume branch voters.
I predicted a nomination immediately after seeing the film, and held on stubbornly as it faded from view, confident that this quirky, conscientious branch would do the right thing. With the voting now opened out to the entire Academy, a win will be tough – particularly with Jacqueline Durran’s marvelous, period-merging creations for “Anna Karenina” leading the pack – but in a race not short of distinguished underdogs to root for, my fingers will be most tightly crossed for Ishioka’s brilliant ghost.
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
This one looks poised for an awards runThursday, May 23, 2013
-
Amusing moments outweighed by sour notes in minor-key family dramaThursday, May 23, 2013
-
Patricia Highsmith adaptation marks the director's return to the big screenWednesday, May 22, 2013
-
'Behind the Candelabra' begins the long march through awards seasonWednesday, May 22, 2013





Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupGeorge Kaplan
January 17, 2013 at 12:28AM EST Reply to CommentI completely agree, I was very happy to see this nominated and even called it out in my Oscar nomination write-up.
http://cinema-ramblings.blogspot.com/2013/01/oscar-nominations-agony-and-ecstasy.html
JJ1
January 17, 2013 at 2:13AM EST Reply to CommentSO happy For Ishioka's nomination.
If I had to pick one nom I'm so happy with, it would be Prometheus for visual effects. So well deserved. My second fave would be Riva for actress.
JLPatt
January 17, 2013 at 2:58AM EST Reply to CommentMine would be "Cloud Atlas" for Best Production Design. Oh wait...
How on Earth can you NOT nominate that?
JJ1 Agreed
January 17, 2013 at 11:41AM ESTGlennAU
January 17, 2013 at 4:25AM EST Reply to CommentAgreed. My favourite nomination of the lot by far. She was a talent to cherish and I'm so happy Ishioka got the recognition, even if she's not here to enjoy it. I too never lost faith that the costume branch would nominate her.
Speaking of Tarsem, one of my favourite solo nominations was THE CELL for make-up. Disappointing it didn't register in costumes (for Eiko) or production design, but that it was recognised at all was an achievement.
Xavier
January 17, 2013 at 7:10AM EST Reply to CommentI completely agree, it really annoys me when a branch clearly just goes with what is a best picture candidate and doesn't focus on the work. The biggest example this year for me would be Argo for score, I mean really? I racked my brain to recall anything about it and cannot think of anything about it that stood out. Especially poor in a year where Jonny Greenwood produces the score for The Master, head and shoulders above any of this years nominations.
I also couldn't believe that the VFX branch didn't include speed racer a few years ago. Whatever you thought of the film those effects were some of the most impressive ever put on screen.
JJ1 Like The Hurt Lockers score nom ... When you go and listen singularly on YouTube, Argos score is very nice. But there are many others this year that are great and more memorable
January 17, 2013 at 11:43AM ESTXavier I'm sure the scores fine, it is Desplat after all, but it just had no lasting presence or defining features. I think his scores for both Rust and Bone and Moonrise were better.
January 17, 2013 at 2:17PM ESTJJ1 Yeah, I also thought Rust and Bone, Moonrise, and zd30 was better .... Which goes to show Argos strength.
January 17, 2013 at 2:40PM ESTJLPatt Desplat's score was one of the few during the year that made an actual impression on me WHILE watching the film. So I can't say I agree with you. And it plays extremely well on its own, too.
January 17, 2013 at 5:13PM ESTMykill
January 17, 2013 at 12:55PM EST Reply to CommentAww this article was wonderful. That is my favorite nomination of the year as well and proof that (sometimes) the Academy can get it right. I agree with your "single-nomination-wonder" statement, those films are always the most fun and sometimes the most flabbergasting (Norbit?) but show the individual branches are willing to think outside the box. The costumes in "Mirror Mirror" were more than just lovely and unique, they also helped tell the story in a way that meshes with Tarsem's frenzied directorial style. My favorite costumes by Eiko Ishioka are still from "The Fall" but her work in this film was nothing short of extraordinary, and I agree that this nomination is both a sentimental career cap and also a bold choice recognizing one of the best costume designers ever at the top of her game. I think recognizing technical contributions to films based on their individual merits rather than blindly nominating the same clump of arbitrary frontrunners in the best picture category should be the point of the technical branches. I never gave up hope either that she would be nominated and even if she doesn't win, I am just happy that her work won't be forgotten.
Al
January 17, 2013 at 2:01PM EST Reply to CommentI understand that its accompanied with an article, but as far as the headline, I don't think anyone was really surprised.
jason liang
January 17, 2013 at 5:21PM EST Reply to CommentI'm sad to learn that Eiko passed away (unfortunately i can't get Variety where I live). Coppola's Dracula is a cult favorite (I know, I interned once for White Wolf) and The Cell could have been a great movie if it had 20 million more in budget and 6 months more in preproduction. Her work speaks for itself; there is no mistakening her style.
Evan
January 17, 2013 at 6:16PM EST Reply to CommentMany of the single-nominee films make me sad because so often they deserved multiple craft nominations. Bright Star missing cinematography? Criminal!
My other favorite type of nomination is when animated films get craft nominations, like in sound editing. It should happen more often.
GlennAU Given they passed Greig Fraser over AGAIN (and for a Best Picture nominee to boot, not to mention KILLING THEM SOFTLY) I suspect they're waiting for him to "earn his dues" or some ridiculous notion.
January 18, 2013 at 4:18AM EST