'Impossible' snubbed as Oscar's VFX race is cut to 10 films
'Life of Pi,' 'Cloud Atlas' and a trio of superhero movies all make the grade
"Cloud Atlas" is one of the 10 films left in the hunt for the Best Visual Effects Oscar.
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
What's that sweet smell of vanilla wafting in from the kitchen? Yep, it's bakeoff time already. Earlier today, the Academy announced the shortlist of 10 films still in the race for the Best Visual Effects Oscar. On January 3, the visual effects branch members will gather to view 10-minute excerpts from the shortlisted films before voting on the final five nominees.
None of the inclusions is as surprising as one particular omission. For its jaw-dropping re-creation of the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami, I had thought Juan Antonio Bayona's "The Impossible" a sure thing for a nomination, let alone a shortlist spot. However, despite nominating "Hereafter" in 2010 for a far less impressive tsunami sequence, the voters felt differently: the Spanish production failed to make a list dominated by expensive Hollywood product.
A trio of superhero blockbusters -- "The Amazing Spider-Man," "The Avengers" and "The Dark Knight Rises" -- made the list, though I'd argue that the effects work in all three is solid rather than dazzling. Greg Ellwood, who's handling the category in our Contenders section, predicted that none of them would ultimately be nominated; that seems less likely now, though four of his predicted nominees ("Cloud Atlas," "The Hobbit," "Life of Pi" and "Prometheus") are still good to go.
Related
-
Academy announces changes to Makeup, Original Song, Visual Effects and Foreign Language Film categories
Did 'The Iron Lady' play a hand in the makeup category's new moniker?
-
Tech Support: 'Avengers,' 'Dark Knight Rises' and 'The Hobbit' lead the race for Best Visual Effects
Other formidable contenders include 'Life of Pi' and 'The Impossible'
The shortlist features seven films Greg had included in his own Top 10 for the category: the outliers, in addition to the aforementioned "Spider-Man," were "Snow White and the Huntsman" and "Skyfall." "Huntsman," I think, is a pretty good call on the branch's part: the pumped-up fairytale's wilder visual concepts are a triumph of aesthetic stylization as well as techno-savvy.
I'm less convinced that "Skyfall," slick as its pyrotechnics are, represents some of the year's very best work in the field: while the film is looking good for cinematography and sound nominations, I'd be surprised to see it go further in this category. The all-but-forgotten "John Carter," however, could well pop up in the nominee list: this branch can be forgiving than most of ambitious work in costly flops, which should also steer "Cloud Atlas" to a nod.
Like most Oscar pundits, however, I sense the path is increasingly clear for "Life of Pi" to secure at least one win on Oscar night, and not just because -- bar a surge in momentum for "The Hobbit" -- it's the only Best Picture contender in the bunch.
Here's the full shortlist:
"The Amazing Spider-Man"
"The Avengers"
"Cloud Atlas"
"The Dark Knight Rises"
"The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey"
"John Carter"
"Life of Pi"
"Prometheus"
"Skyfall"
"Snow White and the Huntsman"
Surprised? Disappointed? What do you expect to see nominated, and what do you expect to take the prize? Have your say in the comments.
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Cambodian film 'The Missing Picture' wins Un Certain Regard sectionSaturday, May 25, 2013
-
A series of talking points and a full annotated transcript hit the netSaturday, May 25, 2013
-
Jim Jarmusch is on typically deadpan form in mildly amusing vampire filmSaturday, May 25, 2013
-
Audiences revisit Celine and Jesse this weekendFriday, May 24, 2013






Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupJonnybon
November 29, 2012 at 4:56PM EST Reply to CommentJust had a skim through some of the "contender" pages. I cannot believe BRAVE is listed as the animated frontrunner. That's got to be a joke...
Jo Agreed. Pirates Band of Misfits was my top choice this year.
December 16, 2012 at 6:43AM ESTGautam
November 29, 2012 at 5:01PM EST Reply to CommentScott Feinberg from Hollywood Reporter had predicted the snubbing of The Impossible long back as he believed, since the film didn't use CGI, there was no scope of it being nominated for a category that rewards best CGI work.
Maxim Wow. That would be an astonishingly myopic reason if that was to be the case.
November 29, 2012 at 5:27PM ESTFirst of all, the categery went unrenamed from the days where practical effects where the only ones that could be rewarded.
Secondary... well, why would they limit themselves to that? A good specifical is a good special effect. And it's not like only CGI films gets nominated in the Animated Category. I guess I really would like to think AMPAS doesn't operate like that.
(And if they really cared about rewarding best CGI work they would have awarded Tintin last year.)
Gautam Maxim, I also had exactly the same question. Visual Effects should mean any effect created with or without CGI. Infact an effect created without CGI should receive more credit for doing so. And what does Academy do ? Snub it altogether.
November 29, 2012 at 5:37PM ESTBut Feinberg, who I believe has contacts within Academy must have had the inkling of this and that's why he had doubts over The Impossible getting nominated.
Maxim Thanks for your response, Guatam. Maybe it's hopeful thinking but I don't know if Scott or anyone can speak for everyone at the brunch like that (though the sentiment might be there). Correlation doesn't imply causation, either. Maybe it was snubbed for other reasons?
November 29, 2012 at 5:49PM ESTTrying to think of other precedents... didn't Hugo have a lot of practical effects as well?
Maxim Gautam*, my appologies.
November 29, 2012 at 5:49PM ESTGautam Academy functions in strange ways. If Scott had reservations of the effects being non-CGI right from the beginning, he must have had some reliable sources to believe so. There's no smoke without fire.
November 29, 2012 at 6:02PM ESTMaxim One miss doesn't represent fire though. When was the last time there was a legitimate non-independent or non-foreign practical effects contender? The Academy might have defaulted to rewarding CGI in the absense of an alternative but it doesn't mean they have a huge bias against it.
November 29, 2012 at 6:31PM ESTNot to mention that even LOTR films had a lot of practical work in them (not that it was driving force but still).
People make assumptions about the race all the time. As I've said, correlation doesn't imply causation. The Impossible haven't even opened yet so it's hard to say what what other factors were in play.
That's really just my take at the moment though.
Evan Pardon my ignorance, but how do you recreate a tsunami if not by computer?
November 29, 2012 at 11:29PM ESTLiz I haven't seen the movie yet, and I wasn't aware that there was no CGI until I read about it here, but I assume the actors and various parts of the sets were in some kind of enormous water tank, and the waves were created with pumps. Like a more complicated version of the wave pool at your local water park. :-)
November 30, 2012 at 1:08AM ESTGautam Evan, There is a featurette of the film on how the whole scene was created without using CGI. You can watch it on You Tube.
November 30, 2012 at 1:20AM ESTMatt
November 29, 2012 at 5:02PM EST Reply to CommentIt's a big year for FX. My predictions, in order of most likely:
1. Life of Pi
2. The Hobbit
3. The Avengers
4. Cloud Atlas
5. The Dark Knight
DylanS I agree with these 5 films, although my ranking would be different (but probably the same top 2)
November 29, 2012 at 11:35PM ESTMaxim
November 29, 2012 at 5:22PM EST Reply to CommentI'd be very very cool if someone could shed some light on this:
Seeing as how The Hobbit only just premiered, is it safe to assume that it remained in the running for a nomination in this category before AMPAS got a chance to view the finished film?
Finished film being the key point here.
Amir
November 29, 2012 at 5:25PM EST Reply to CommentI haven't seen The Impossible yet, but I'm genuinely surprised. Everything I'd heard about it pointed to a VFX nomination. It's a shame that the category's completely taken over by CGI now.
loyal_mehnert
November 29, 2012 at 5:27PM EST Reply to CommentThe Impossible snub doesn't bother me, it's Best Visual Effects not Effect.
Liz
November 29, 2012 at 5:35PM EST Reply to CommentI don't know if I'm just becoming jaded or what, but I'm having a hard time conjuring up enthusiasm for this category this year. I should preface this by saying that, from the shortlist, I haven't seen Life of Pi or The Hobbit yet. But from what I have seen, there's been nothing that really dazzled me, like in Rise of the Planet of the Apes, Inception, Avatar, or District 9. Sure, there's been a lot of special effects. But it's very much a quantity-over-quality kind of year for me.
daveylo I will be surprised if you are not impressed by the visuals of Life of Pi.
November 29, 2012 at 6:00PM ESTDanny I think at least "Life of Pi" will be a welcome dazzling exception for you.
November 29, 2012 at 6:09PM ESTRev. Slappy The tiger is Life of Pi is pretty amazing.
November 29, 2012 at 10:15PM ESTGraysmith
November 29, 2012 at 5:49PM EST Reply to CommentSurprised to see Skyfall on this list considering its effects were pretty terrible (most notably, the plastic Daniel Craig face pasted onto a bike stunt guy and the explosion at the MI-6 office which looked so fake). I can't even remember anything else about the movie (effects-wise) so I'd say its effects were either bad or unmemorable.
CaptainCanada
November 29, 2012 at 6:05PM EST Reply to Comment"Life of Pi"'s visuals are utterly astonishing. And the best use of 3D, bar none, that I've ever seen.
d2
November 29, 2012 at 8:45PM EST Reply to CommentI'm still pissed the Academy wasn't smart enough to nominate the subtle effects works of Black Swan (let alone the score, costumes, make-up, art direction, sound and supporting actress)...good thing BAFTA is smarter than the average bear so-to-speak
JJ1 I agree with most of this. Black Swan deserved a lot more, imo.
November 29, 2012 at 10:25PM ESTGuesto There was nothing particularly impressive about Black Swan's effects work. I understand what you trying to say though - the way they were used was occasionally clever albeit not always original. Part of the reason I disagree though, is because I didn't find the effects or much about the film "subtle".
November 29, 2012 at 10:36PM ESTI was impressed by Portman's acting and the editing the most (and bith were recognized).
The Fountain is a whole different story. That's the one they should have nominated for VFX.
Guesto I also disagree about your conclusion about BAFTAs but I'll give them the fact that they make interesting choices in the effects category.
November 29, 2012 at 10:45PM ESTMatt
November 30, 2012 at 2:51PM EST Reply to CommentConsidering it's budget, I'm baffled as to why 'Chronicle' was snubbed. Good F/X for a small budgeted movie. I see the nominees being: The Avengers, Cloud Atlas, The Hobbit, Life of Pi, and Prometheus.
Lincoln Argo
December 1, 2012 at 8:32AM EST Reply to CommentI suposed it's not good for the americans that an Spanish production with a 30 million Euro budget could beat them in a genuine american category winner.