Elizabeth Olsen and Alicia Vikander feature on BAFTA's female-heavy Rising Star list
'Life of Pi' newcomer Suraj Sharma is the lone male nominee
Alicia Vikander in "Anna Karenina."
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
The BAFTA Rising Star Award, the one prize subjected to a public vote at the UK's answer to the Oscars, can be a frustrating business. More often than not, it pits a host of gifted young actors against one contender with a higher profile among Britain's youthful texting masses, rendering the competition a bit flat -- and the outcome often a bit iffy. Noel Clarke over Michael Fassbender? Adam Deacon over anyone? We may routinely complain about awards bodies' decisions, but it still beats hearing the people sing.
This year, however, the BAFTA jury charged with compiling the nominees appears to have safeguarded against that problem with a discerning, evenly matched shortlist of names, most of whom will be unfamiliar to multiplex crowds.
The 2012 BAFTA Rising Star nominees are:
Elizabeth Olsen
Andrea Riseborough
Suraj Sharma
Juno Temple
Alicia Vikander
The heavily female slant of this year's list is refreshing, and seems to issue a tacit apology for last year's contentiously all-male lineup. "Life of Pi" star Suraj Sharma is the lone male nominee, though he may wind up the winner, given that he's in the highest-profile film of the lot -- one that is doing robust business at the UK box office right now.
Related
-
Berlinale Diary: 'Shadow Dancer,' 'Captive,' 'I, Anna,' 'Marley'
James Marsh's Sundance hit delivers on Andrea Riseborough's promise
That said, Sharma also has the shortest résumé of any of the nominees. Given that the award recognizes overall star potential rather than individual performances, it's rare for the BAFTA jury to cite a debut actor -- they must have been extremely impressed by the Indian newcomer's solo shouldering of a tricky project.
The jury is usually inclined to wait to see a little more from a bright new star -- which is why Elizabeth Olsen, for example, pops up this year. Last year, BAFTA joined most major awards groups in ignoring her striking debut turn in "Martha Marcy May Marlene." This year, with her screen presence further proven, if less generously acclaimed, in "Red Lights," "Liberal Arts" and "Silent House" (in which I think she's particularly impressive), the jury decided she's ready for her close-up.
I'm pleased to see Olsen here, but that goes for all the actresses selected. Juno Temple has been steadily climbing the ranks since an early appearance in "Atonement," but a lot of critics woke up to the 23-year-old Brit following her blazing baby-doll turn in "Killer Joe," in which she's part Tennessee Williams naif, part Juliette Lewis: she cracks my hypothetical Best Supporting Actress ballot for the second year running, after similarly flavorful work in Gregg Araki's "Kaboom."
If I boarded the Temple train earlier, Swedish star Alicia Vikander was a genuine 2012 discovery for me. Months after holding her own opposite two formidable male leads in Danish Oscar hopeful "A Royal Affair," she made her English-language debut in "Anna Karenina" -- and gave, for my money, the film's strongest performance with her fragile, nuanced take on Kitty.
Riseborough seems the most advanced of this group -- and not just because, at the age of 31, she's the oldest by a several years. Between such films as "Brighton Rock," "Never Let Me Go" and "W.E.," she's been appearing on Best Newcomer lists for over two years now, and she already has a TV BAFTA nod for her turn as Margaret Thatcher in "The Long Walk to Finchley." It took me a while to warm to her, but I came round after her superb turn as an IRA informant in "Shadow Dancer," for which she recently won the British Independent Film Award for Best Actress -- there's a slim chance she could be a double BAFTA nominee this year.
Who gets your vote from this lineup? I'm torn, but I think I may spend a text's worth on Olsen. Voting details are here; the winner will be announced at the BAFTA ceremony on February 10. (The rest of the nominees, by the way, land on Wednesday.)
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Jim Jarmusch is on typically deadpan form in mildly amusing vampire filmSaturday, May 25, 2013
-
Audiences revisit Celine and Jesse this weekendFriday, May 24, 2013
-
Marion Cotillard and Joaquin Phoenix play out a bad romance in 1920s-set dramaFriday, May 24, 2013
-
Matthias Schoenaerts the ensemble standout in overlong period thrillerFriday, May 24, 2013





Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupLiz
January 7, 2013 at 11:10AM EST Reply to CommentPersonally, I would go with Elizabeth Olsen here. But I assume that it will come down to Sharma and Temple, both with recent high profile movies under their belts (even if Temple had virtually nothing to do in "The Dark Knight Rises").
red_wine
January 7, 2013 at 12:10PM EST Reply to CommentVikander is gonna be a star. I see her as a really magnificent new actress. Very lovely and very talented. She was superb in A Royal Affair.
forg
January 7, 2013 at 12:14PM EST Reply to CommentNo Samantha Barks is a surprise to me
d2
January 7, 2013 at 12:40PM EST Reply to CommentQuvenzhane Wallis. By a mile. Of the listed, I'd go for Sharma. For sure.
Is Oscar season over yet??
January 7, 2013 at 12:49PM EST Reply to CommentI hate when movie "critics" equate likable characters to best performances. Alica's kitty is a likable character but to say she gave the best performance in Anna Karenina is laughable. Jude Law and Keira Knightley had more complex and challenging roles. Alica didn't have to do much, except be pretty and fragile. Sadly, this is the dominant mentality in contemporary "film criticism." Personal preference is now being intellectualized as legitimate criticism.
praetor And what about A Royal Affair then?
January 7, 2013 at 3:07PM ESTSilvana
January 7, 2013 at 1:20PM EST Reply to CommentNobody trusts in Marion Cotillard already to Best Actress Oscar nomination. Just I hope she gets the nomination because her wonderful performance in Rust and Bone deserves being rewarded.
Please Academy, nominate to Marion Cotillard for Rust and Bone!!!
Guy Lodge I think you'll find Marion Cotillard wasn't nominated here because she's not a rising star. She is risen, as it were.
January 7, 2013 at 4:47PM ESTSilvana I was referring to your predictions of Oscar nominations. If Marion Cotillard isn't nominated to the Academy Awards for Rust and Bone I would be equally dissapointed as the last year when Tilda Swinton was ignored.
January 7, 2013 at 4:53PM ESTPlease Academy, nominate to Marion Cotillard for Rust and Bone!!!
Joe7827 I totally agree. I voted for Marion Cotillard for President in the last election. If we're having a serious conversation, though, I think it's between Wallis and Cotillard for the last slot.
January 7, 2013 at 7:52PM ESTBack to the topic at hand... what Sharma did was pretty impressive. I think Vikander was cute in "Anna Karenina", but there wasn't much to her role. I don't think Olsen endeared herself last year with her "eew, my sisters are gross" routine. As for Riseborough, apparently she was in "Never Let Me Go", but I have no recollection. And really, Juno Temple? What about the two kids from "Moonrise Kingdom", or Aubrey Plaza, or Quvenzhane, or Tom Holland?
Silvana I think Riva and Wallis will not being nominated.
January 7, 2013 at 10:28PM ESTBut another point. Joe you forget and it seems everybody's here that Orange Award recognize a promising career for an actor, so it's very impossible that Quvenzhané or Tom with only one film could be nominated. To be nominated to Orange Award the actors in competition need an important filmography.
The first winner of Orange Award was James McAvoy. And this time only Suraj Sharma is with one only film but Juno Temple, Andrea Riseborough, Alicia Vikander and Elizabeth Olsen have more of one starring role on their filmographies
Joe7827 Silvana - I'll assume that English is not your primary language (why do I suspect it's French), but I'll point out that it can't be impossible for Wallis or Holland, since Sharma is in the mix. While I was impressed with Sharma, I'd say that the other two did even more star-making work. I was especially surprised about Holland's omission, since he's British; did "The Impossible" not open yet in the UK?
January 7, 2013 at 10:57PM ESTSilvana Joe. Focus on the topic under discussion, please. And being british it's not really important to be nominated or winning. And as I wrote before the Rising Star award recognize actors with increasing filmography not only one.
January 8, 2013 at 10:24AM ESTPaul Outlaw
January 7, 2013 at 1:38PM EST Reply to CommentOg, geez...
Paul Outlaw Reply to comment...
January 7, 2013 at 1:39PM ESTPaul Outlaw I meant "oh, geez," and I love Marion Cotillard in Rust and Bone. (Way too early in the Monday a.m. for me to be posting.)
January 7, 2013 at 1:40PM ESTMGabe
January 7, 2013 at 2:44PM EST Reply to CommentOlsen was all kinds of wonderful in Martha Marcy May Marlene, from the list--which I agree is a very strong one--she's the one I'd like to see get awarded, she deserves the career push more than say, Andrea Riseborough (who shouldn't be on any "rising star" lists after she's headlined or appeared in quite a few films already). Samantha Barks should have been cited, but as Guy pointed out, they don't cite debuts too often.
gregel
January 7, 2013 at 4:28PM EST Reply to CommentThis is silly. Suraj Sharma and Alicia Vikander are the only really new rising stars here. Riseborough and Olsen should have been last year.
Guy Lodge Consider that Martha Marcy May Marlene only opened in the UK in February 2012, so nominating her last year would have been asking the public to vote based on a performance they hadn't yet seen.
January 7, 2013 at 4:49PM EST