Christopher Nolan talks James Bond, Heath Ledger and his 'Dark Knight' trilogy at Lincoln Center
An intimate discussion focused on his seven-year journey with the Caped Crusader
Christopher Nolan on the set of "The Dark Knight Rises"
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
NEW YORK -- "The Dark Knight Rises" director Christopher Nolan stopped by the Lincoln Center's Walter Reade Theater Wednesday night for one of the Film Society's "An Evening with…" events. Scott Foundas moderated the discussion, which didn't focus on Nolan's full career, but rather, his experience with the character of Batman across a trilogy of films that has changed the landscape of blockbuster filmmaking and, indeed, the awards race itself.
Whether Nolan and his film are in a position in this crowded year to make good at the Oscars in major categories is debatable, but Warner Bros. is doing well by the director with one of the more compelling visual "for your consideration" campaigns of the year and plenty of reminding that Nolan broke the barriers of the ghetto-ized "comic book" film. And that's just where the discussion began Wednesday, as Nolan recalled what it was that attracted him to the project in the first place.
"I'm not a huge comic book fan," he admitted. "I've never pretended to be. It's very dangerous to pretend you're a comic book fan. They spot you pretty early…But what I saw was a very clear, identifiable gap in movie history, if you like."
That gap, Nolan said, pertained to an opportunity left in the wake of the highly stylized versions of Batman created by filmmaker Tim Burton, which he called "fantastic, but very 'Tim Burton,' very idiosyncratic." Nolan, as he's said numerous times, yearned for something more engrained in reality. Because despite the fact that his first exposure to the character was through the campy Adam West television series of the 1960s, what he always took from the comics was a sense of the real world.
Related
-
Exclusive: Is Joseph Gordon-Levitt already set to play Batman in 'Justice League'?
Warner Bros. appears to be firming up their plans for the future of the chara...
-
'The Dark Knight Rises' joins 'Avatar' in IMAX's $100 million club
Superhero threequel becomes second film to cross giant-screen milestone
There was also plenty of discussion about the James Bond franchise, which Nolan has always noted as a particular influence on his work. (And ironic, then, that the clearly "Dark Knight"-influenced "Skyfall" moved into the IMAX venues "The Dark Knight Rises" had camped out in over the summer). One of the first films he ever saw was "The Spy Who Loved Me," and at a certain point, the Bond films fixed in his head as a great example of scope and scale. "That globe-trotting thing, that idea of trying to get you along for a ride, that was very much a jumping-off point cinematically [for the 'Dark Knight' trilogy]," he said.
Foundas brought up the idea of action films in a post-9/11 environment and how that was something that played into the tonal shift of these films as well. "Batman Begins" was released in 2005 and started the thematic construct that would be shared across the trilogy's villains: terrorism.
"Interestingly, the Bond films, back in the 60s, they were very specifically about Cold War fears," Nolan said. "They introduced the threat of nuclear terrorism very specifically for the first time in movies and they were closer than people realize, in pop culture terms, to what people feared at the time. And I think that one of the things in taking on an action film set in a great American city post-9/11, if we were going to be honest in terms of our fears and what might threaten this great city, then we were going to come up against terrorism and how that might feature in the universe of Batman. And I think we approached it with a great deal of sincerity."
Ra's al Ghul, the Joker and Bane, thereby, serve as Nolan's central trio of adversaries seeking, above all, to destroy Gotham through terror, chaos and, ultimately, the cruel tease of hope.
Nolan noted that actor Liam Neeson, who starred in "Batman Begins" and briefly in "The Dark Knight Rises" as Ra's al Ghul, was a godsend. "The great thing about Liam is he can sell anything," the director said, before recalling one of the film's earlier scenes between al Ghul (then going by the alias Ducard) and his pupil, Bruce Wayne: "They're sitting by the fire and there's this line I wrote. Liam says, 'Rub your chest. Your arms will take care of themselves.' And I pictured Boy Scouts all over the world freezing to death because I just made up this thing. I don't go camping, I have no idea. And he says it and you believe it!"
There was also discussion of Nolan's interest in the process of things in his work. A film like "The Prestige" is very much caught up in the process of magic, for instance, the procedural nature of things and the physical elements at play. His work on the Batman films is no exception.
"It's something I enjoy, knowing and seeing a process of things come together," Nolan said. "I think that's a great pleasure in movies. But it's also a way of frankly circumventing a lot of the suspicion the audience might have of something. In the case of 'Inception,' when you're dealing with dreams, you risk alienating. 'It's not real, it's a dream.' The solution was to allow the audience in on the creation of the dream, so the dream is not fooling the audience, they're complicit in fooling a third party.
"Similar with Batman, if he just arrived fully-formed into an ordinary world, not a Tim Burton world, with the ears and the cape, it would be laughable. So the way around it was to see the symbolism, why he's doing that, and try to involve the audience in the mental process of figuring out what's going to make him frightening to criminals. It's one of the reasons in 'Batman Begins' we never show Batman clearly. We show him being a terrifying wraith."
Two clips from the film were shown: the montage sequence built around Ducard/Wayne's glacier sparring and a scene toward the end of the film when Bruce is forced to mimic disorderly drunkenness to get a house full of guests out of harm's way. The latter in particular, Nolan noted, reflected actor Christian Bale's considerable talent, juggling psychology and physicality with ease.
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Patricia Highsmith adaptation marks the director's return to the big screenWednesday, May 22, 2013
-
'Behind the Candelabra' begins the long march through awards seasonWednesday, May 22, 2013
-
Come for the Gosling-Refn reunion, stay for the craft and Kristin Scott ThomasWednesday, May 22, 2013
-
What's good and what's bad directly from the PalaisWednesday, May 22, 2013








Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login SignupNick
November 29, 2012 at 2:35PM EST Reply to CommentNo mention about Ledger in the article, yet it's in the headline?
linus On the second page of the article.
November 29, 2012 at 2:44PM ESTmridge1 There's a page 2 Nick....
November 29, 2012 at 2:44PM ESTPrettok I agree with 3rd man. The next movie Batman should be based on the early 60s sci-fi era Batman, with Clayface, Man-Bat, and a properly done Freeze. It would fit more naturally with any upcoming JLA movie series.
December 1, 2012 at 2:02AM ESTjames
November 29, 2012 at 3:08PM EST Reply to CommentGreat stuff, had a blast reading it. Thanks.
Mulderism
November 29, 2012 at 3:20PM EST Reply to CommentIf I could ask Nolan one question it would be what his plans were for the Joker in the third film before Heath Ledger passed away.
I know that Nolan says he only works on one picture at a time but he must have had an idea of where he would take the character in future films. The Joker didn't die in TDK and I've read that in the novelization of TDKR that the Joker was being held in solitary confinement in another jail different from the one that Bane destroyed.
CaptainCanada It's not really obvious that we'd have seen him again. They had pretty much done everything there was to do be done with that iteration of the character.
December 1, 2012 at 1:19AM ESTChris138
November 29, 2012 at 4:31PM EST Reply to CommentThis was a great read, thanks for attending and writing about it. Even with TDKR not quite living up to its predecessors I still think the trilogy as a whole is superior to any other comic book movie out there. But I am very curious and looking forward to what Nolan will be working on next, hopefully something smaller in the budget range of The Prestige.
bgg1175
November 29, 2012 at 5:41PM EST Reply to CommentNolan should've stopped after TDK. TDKRises was in some ways a rip off of The Dark Knight as it took the same tone of the films second half and made a whole film from it. And the story seemed like it wasnt quite finished before it went into filming.
Nolan seemed so set on his realism he forgot to inject anything remotely entertaining into the film.
But the flawed story with all of its obvious plotholes was something of an insult as if someone where saying "I know the holes are there-buts its only a superhero film and the fans will buy it."
So you had characters existing in an ultra realistic world but then leaping into another world with less realism so Bruce Wayne can go from crippled to leaping around rooftops and from damaged back and needing to wear Harry Potter's Magic Knee brace to escaping a prison with no knee brace required and a back fixed by a vertebrae smashed back into place. And a knife wound thats treated like a mere splinter in his finger.
The Dark Knight Rises was an unentertaining bore and a mess.
Skyfall thankfully wasnt made in Nolan's depressive film state and anti entertainment mindset.
Jake "ultra realistic"
November 29, 2012 at 6:38PM ESTI am going to rip all of hair out if I keep hearing this shit. There is nothing remotely realistic about any of Nolan Batman films. Nothing. He's always stated that the films exist in a sort of "heightened" or "hyper" reality. I don't why people keep forgetting that. TDKR was a mess, but it was because of structure/character/thematic issues, not nitpicky shit like knee braces.
Chris138 "Skyfall thankfully wasnt made in Nolan's depressive film state and anti entertainment mindset."
November 29, 2012 at 6:48PM ESTNot so sure about that one...
ThirdMan
November 29, 2012 at 9:26PM EST Reply to CommentWhatever its faults (and I'll continually contend that they're far less than certain individuals suggest), I'll still gladly watch TDKR (which I prefer to Begins, and has better action coverage than TDK) numerous times in the future. Whereas with regards to "prestige" films like Lincoln, Life Of Pi, Flight, Argo, The Master (some of which I liked well enough), it's one and done.
All that said, I hope Warners goes full-on spandex with their next version of Batman, and then we'll see how an uber-literal translation fares in live-action. Somehow I don't think it'll turn out as well as the '90s Animated Series. But hey, at least the actor inside the suit will be more mobile, and can divebomb around the city with his grappling hook and cape. Maybe they can throw Bat-Mite in there just for fun. ;)
Anyways, insofar as I care about these ultimately inconsequential awards (I come here for the writing, not the Oscar prognostication), it'd be nice to see Moonrise Kingdom get a little love...you could damn near hang almost any image from that film on your wall, and the story's delightful.
Guesto I absolutely disagree. I will take a pause (for reasons that have nothing to do with its quality - rather because it's a demanding watch) but I certainly would revisit Lincoln. In fact, I already look forward to having that transportive experience. Prestige has nothing to do with anything.
November 29, 2012 at 10:19PM ESTKyle I'm glad someone else prefers TDKR to Batman Begins. Certainly, taste is subjective, but in so many respects I find BB to be the least of the trilogy. Past its first hour (which is a beautifully realized origin and the reason I find the film so rewatchable), it just falls apart in a mess of plot contrivances and bad David Goyer lines. It also feels the most claustrophobic of the trilogy. I realize it took Blade Runner as a big inspiration, but once you compare it to the huge urban landscape of TDK and TDKR, BB just feels so oddly insular and sound-stagey. There's just something there that feels the initial Origin and Year One inspired stuff was the story Nolan really wanted to tell, and the final act had alot less passion, and what maybe is the work of a filmmaker who didn't have as much control as he'd get later.
November 30, 2012 at 9:43AM ESTGuesto
November 29, 2012 at 10:31PM EST Reply to Comment"that has changed the landscape of blockbuster filmmaking and, indeed, the awards race itself."
Can we please stop overstating the impact on the awards race (especially in terms of the overall trilogy)?
No one has ever been able to explain why the film the Academy didn't care enough to nominate for Best Picture in the first place suddenly has such a big place in their heads.
Yes, the slate of films expanded. No, it wasn't just due to The Dark Knight. It probably helped justify the change in fans minds but there's really no clear proof it was the driving force.
The Inception was nominated in the expanded field. It's not that unique in that. So did District 9. Neither got a Best Director nod. This year few predict that the sequel to the this supposed awards game changer will even get in, in the expanded field.
And as for change the landscape of blockbuster filmmaking, I really don't see how it did that. I really can't think of a single blockbuster that I would truly consider to be inspired by Nolan's Batman films.
James Skyfall, you moron.
November 29, 2012 at 11:59PM ESTKristopher Tapley The Dark Knight was a huge factor. Period. Factual. No overstating. Let it go.
November 30, 2012 at 12:09AM ESTBy the way, "the Academy" and "the Academy's Board of Governors" aren't one and the same. There is something called "brass," and the "brass" makes the call because the overall body didn't nominated a film and thereby caused an uproar.
This is irrefutable. Not even sure why you're attempting to pick it apart.
The rest of this is weird rambling.
Kyle Skyfall, Amazing Spider-man, and possibly Star Trek into Darkness to start.
November 30, 2012 at 9:35AM ESTjimmy
November 30, 2012 at 4:54AM EST Reply to CommentIt was ridiculous they didn't discuss Anne Hathaway's Selina Kyle, because she owned every scene in TDKR. And, I missed her , whenever she wasn't onscreen. Also, they should have spoken about Cillian Murphy's contribution to Scarecrow ( Batman Begins). For years, those two performances, besides Ledger's The Joker, will be the most talked about performances from Nolan's Batman Trilogy .
Kristopher Tapley I think they were just crunched at the end. I was more shocked there was zero discussion of Gary Oldman.
November 30, 2012 at 12:38PM ESTThirdMan
November 30, 2012 at 4:17PM EST Reply to CommentGuesto - I only used "prestige" in relation to the types of films that the Academy often nominates, and those featuring great historical figures often fall into that. (In retrospect, The Master doesn't really belong there, as it's too esoteric). Re: Lincoln, I probably liked it best of those I mentioned, and though I wouldn't be totally opposed to seeing it again in the future, I feel like I got all I needed to get from it (emotionally, narratively) on that first viewing. Though I understand where you're coming from, you can't really "disagree" with that, because while having little replay value isn't a fact with relation to the film in general, it IS a fact with my own personal experience. Anyways, that's just semantics. I'm glad the film exists, I think it's well acted across the board, and certainly a handsome production; it just doesn't mean that much to me personally. Cheers.
Kyle - I think you've got it right with regards to Begins being the most claustrophobic of the trilogy. I'd probably concede that it's more singularly focused than the sequels (fear-fear-fear, fear-fear), but I find the rich soup of varying/conflicting themes in the later installments to be considerably more compelling. And, truthfully, Bane is my second-favourite villain in the entire trilogy; I love the way his weirdly theatrical voice contrasts with his hulking physicality, and Hardy, IMO, does a lot of really good work with his eyes and body language. By comparison, though certainly a sturdy adversary, I found Neeson's Al Ghul to be rather dry and bloodless; mind you, I generally find that character a tad bland in the comics/Animated Series/videogames as well. It's just down to personal preference.
And, yeah, Hathaway's Selina Kyle is far and away the most compelling female presence in a mostly male-dominated franchise. I thought she served her function (to help motivate Bruce Wayne to re-engage with life) in the film rather well. The goodwill generated by the performance (even amongst many of those who don't care for the film overall) is only going to enhance Hathaway's chances of securing a Supporting win for Les Mis. The award doesn't mean much to me, but it would mean a lot to her, and I wish her luck.
B3TT3RTH4NY0U
December 1, 2012 at 10:59AM EST Reply to CommentNolan 4 Prez!