Austria enters Haneke's 'Amour' in the foreign Oscar race
A foreign-language nod is likely, but can it cross over into the general race?
Jean-Louis Trintignant in "Amour."
Are you a fan of In Contention?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
I'll make this relatively quick, partly because I have a screening to run to, and partly because we've covered this ground in a previous post. But thanks to Austrian reader Norman Shetler for informing us that his country has selected their entry for this year's Best Foreign Language Film Oscar race -- and, as we suspected, it's Michael Haneke's Palme d'Or winner "Amour."
"But it's a French film!" I hear some of you cry. Well, no: this is a global industry, after all, and a film isn't defined by the country it's set in or the language it speaks. As a French-Austrian-German co-production, any one of those three countries would have been entitled to submit it. Tidily enough, it's the director's home country that gets the privilege this time.
France was never in the running to submit it anyway. Haneke's film is only released there next month, thus missing the eligibility window: to qualify, a film must have been released in the submitting country at some point in the 12 months preceding the October 1 submission deadline. This frees them up to submit something by one of their own. If, as I suspect they might, the French enter the feelgood, Weinstein-backed crossover smash "The Intouchables," they could ironically be one of "Amour"'s most formidable obstacles to the win.
Related
-
Off the Carpet: Telluride wraps, Toronto approaches
What will the upcoming Canada marathon have in store for the season?
Meanwhile, selecting "Amour" is a vindicating move for Austria in two respects. First, it should soothe any lingering animosity over the 2009 race, when Austria and Germany tussled over who got to submit Haneke's previous Palme champ, "The White Ribbon." Germany won, and was duly nominated; Austria's second choice, "For a Moment, Freedom," didn't crack the shortlist.
Secondly, the selection of "Amour" is a subtly pointed rejoinder to the Academy. The last time Austria submitted a Haneke film (they've done so four times, not once netting a nomination) was in 2005, when they entered the acclaimed "Hidden" -- which, like "Amour," is set in Paris with a French cast. The Academy controversially disqualified the film, claiming it was insufficiently Austrian to compete -- as good a demonstration as any of the flaws of the Academy's outmoded construction of this category. They effectively admitted their error the next year, changing the rules to permit films in non-native languages to compete. So by entering "Amour" -- which would also have been disqualified in 2005 -- Austria is effectively inviting the Academy to prove their changed ways.
Anyway, though we often say nothing is certain in this ever-perverse category, this news all but guarantees "Amour" a spot on the nine-film Oscar shortlist in January. Its blunt emotional impact, pristine craft and thematic resonance to older voters already stands it in good stead in this category, but even if it turns out to be overly tough medicine for lightweight voters, there is no imaginable way the executive committee will let it slip through the cracks.
Less certain is what this means for the film's chances in other categories. As you saw in this this week's chart update accompanying Kris's Off the Carpet column, we're currently predicting Sony Picture Classics, given little else to work with, will give "Amour" the full weight of their campaign energy, securing nominations for Best Picture, Director and Original Screenplay, as well as for its two impeccable leads. It would make it the first foreign-language film in history to score that haul of nominations (and the first to crack the top category in six years), but it's well within the realm of possibility.
Funnily enough, however, it would be even likelier if the film had somehow failed to be entered in the foreign-language race, meaning Haneke supporters would have no choice but to vote for it in the general field. Will the film's fans -- and there will be a number of them -- be content to recognize it in the ghetto race, or will they think it sufficiently special to honor across the board? We'll see.
2012-2013 OSCAR PREDICTIONS
Best Picture
Best Director
Best Actor
Best Actress
Best Supporting Actor
Best Supporting Actress
Best Adapted Screenplay
Best Original Screenplay
Best Cinematography
Best Costume Design
Best Film Editing
Best Makeup And Hairstyling
Best Original Score
Best Original Song
Best Production Design
Best Sound Editing
Best Sound Mixing
Best Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film
Best Documentary Feature
Best Foreign Language Film
Latest Posts
-
Zal Batmanglij's latest hits theaters May 31Tuesday, May 21, 2013
-
Michael Douglas and Matt Damon excel in Soderbergh's witty Liberace biopicTuesday, May 21, 2013
-
The actor-director gets all the best close-ups in his Faulkner adaptationMonday, May 20, 2013
-
'Traumatized critics exhale.'Monday, May 20, 2013





Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupred_wine
September 4, 2012 at 2:16PM EST Reply to CommentThe Academy would be torn apart in press if they dared to disqualify Amour (or indeed failed to nominate it), it seems to me even more universally acclaimed than A Separation. And if they ended up nominating a film as severe as The White Ribbon, this might have an easier passage.
But in the general categories, you and Kris strike me as a tad optimistic. Iwo Jima scored Picture/Director/Script but was really an American production by an American director who was on a hot streak. And even that barely made it in. Amour will have a rockier passage. In the Academy's heyday (or foreign loving period), director nominations for foreign films were routine. Sadly the numbers have really dwindled.
/3rt Do you believe the director's branch is more conservative from the best picture expansion?
September 4, 2012 at 2:45PM ESTJohn G. I forgot about Iwo Jima and thought he was referring to Babel ... a film in many languages by a Mexican director. I remember the meme on '06 was "the international Oscars." I think the Academy could find room for Amour this year; the picks are pretty slim so far.
September 4, 2012 at 3:32PM ESTThe Great Dane
September 4, 2012 at 7:07PM EST Reply to CommentI didn't know they actually changed the language rule. I still thought a submitted film HAD to be in a native language of the submitting country. That's great news - don't know how I missed it, thought I new every rule change for the last ten years, and somehow this "old" news slipped right passed me.
GlennAU The language of the submitting country was always a stupid rule (if it in fact ever was one). Just as people talking in a language other than English shouldn't immediately disqualify an American film as "American", yeah? I'm still hoping news filters through that Australia is submitting "Lore", an Aus/Germany coproduction set in Germany and spoken in German, but still with a swag of Australians in the tech fields. It helps that it's a fantastic film that could easily be nominated, too.
September 5, 2012 at 5:18AM ESTJonnybon
September 4, 2012 at 7:52PM EST Reply to CommentI wish France could submit both "Untouchable" AND "Rust & Bone". Such a shame...
Jonnybon And I haven't seen Holy Motors, but I hear that may be deserving too.
September 4, 2012 at 7:54PM ESTGuy Lodge It is, but too far outside the Academy's comfort zone for them to consider.
September 5, 2012 at 4:00AM ESTmickche
September 7, 2012 at 2:43AM EST Reply to CommentJust a sidenote: Cate Shortland's Lore has been submitted as Australia's Foreign Language Film entry, noting its a German-Australian co-production