Cannes Film Festival 2013

'American Idol' Top 24 - Top 12 Men performance gallery

Relive all of Wednesday night's dreadful performances for the 'Idol' men in gallery form

Todrick Hall of 'American Idol' performs

Todrick Hall of 'American Idol' performs

Singer: Todrick Hall
Song: "Since You've Been Gone"
Monkeys As Critics' Take: The judges love gender-bending performances, so expect enthusiasm for this version of the Kelly Clarkson hit. Who does this arrangement come from? It's pretty funky. It's not a great showcase for Todrick's voice, but it allows him to display some impressive stage work. He's a performer and that's instantly evidence. Finally, there's very little evidence of singing her, but it's entertaining and never boring. I like never-boring, because I'm gonna bet we get a lot of boring later on. [Note: Todrick says this arrangement was all him. He also said he'd give small children roles in his traveling musical. The first impresses me a little. The second? Not so much.]
Ellen, Randy, Kara and Simon Say: Ellen didn't love the chorus, but she thought it was well performed, that he took a chance. Randy's a fan of Todrick, thinks he's "mad talented." Randy's annoyed that he didn't recognize the song. Yes, this is the same judge who complained about sound-alike covers. Mmm... Glad to get the judging hypocrisy going early tonight. Kara also thinks he changed the arrangement too much. This from a judge who loved Adam Lambert last year? Hmmm... Simon calls it "a crazy arrangement," one that completely murders the original song and "verging on stupid." Don't get me wrong. Todrick wasn't necessarily good enough as a singer to pull off what he attempted, but boy would I like to see more people attempt things.
 

Photo Credit: Michael Becker/FOX

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Ben

    MediaCurves.com conducted a poll on 3,827 American Idol viewers’ perceptions of which male contestants should be eliminated from the top 24 on tomorrow’s results show. Viewers selected Casey James as the contestant who should advance to the next round of the competition based on his performance last night. The contestants with the lowest percentage of votes were Jermaine Sellers, with 3.2%, and Todrick Hall, with 4.7% of the votes. The study will parallel American Idol voting to determine the weekly winners based on a democratic, “one person, one vote” methodology.
    More in depth results can be seen at: http://www.mediacurves.com/Entertainment/J7751-AmericanIdol-2-24-10/Index.cfm
    Thanks,
    Ben

    February 25, 2010 at 6:43PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan Ben - But "American Idol" *isn't* a one-person/one-vote system, so how will your methodology mirror the "American Idol" results? -Daniel

      February 25, 2010 at 7:11PM EST
    • Dan,
      I just wanted to clarify the purpose of this study. We are not trying to predict who American Idol will vote off each week. We feel that the American Idol voting system, which gauges intensity by allowing viewers to vote multiple times, is flawed. Our aim is to try to give a fair alternative vote for which American Idol contestants should continue in the competition based on democratic principles, where a person gets only one vote. I hope this clears up any concerns you may have had regarding our study. Please visit our home page for more information: http://www.mediacurves.com
      Thanks,
      Ben

      March 4, 2010 at 3:02PM EST
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan Ben - The system isn't "flawed," because there's no presumption or *claim* of democratic representation or proportionality within the "American Idol" framework. "Idol" has *always* been an intensity-driven voting competition, which to some degree mirrors the entertainment industry in general, where record sales and concert revenue is no longer based on casual fandom. Heck, just getting people to vote at all is a display of passion beyond casual fandom, since the casual fans are never going to buy an album by ANY of these people. So your study doesn't in any way reflect a flaw in the "Idol" system. It just says, "Here's what the voting on 'American Idol' would looking like if it were a completely different show with a completely different purpose and a completely different voting system." That, to my mind, makes it closer to science fiction than statistics. But hey, it's your study! -Daniel

      March 4, 2010 at 3:17PM EST
    • Dan,
      With regards to your suggestions that we have flawed statistics: the studies we conduct reflect a randomly selected sample that comes from a large national panel. This panel is matched to the demographics and characteristics of the US population. With the current sample size used for this study we are operating on a 95% confidence level, which is standard for this industry. As such, our results are statistically accurate, relevant, and generalizable the US population.

      With regards to your analogy to the entertainment industry: would people generally buy the same music album multiple times if they liked it more? Would a person be likely to buy two tickets for one night at a seated concert venue because they liked really enjoyed the artist? These would be similar analogies to American Idol measuring a contestant’s popularity by having viewers voting multiple times for one night’s Idol competition performances. As Glenn mentioned on our website (see http://www.mediacurves.com for the original comment), if intensity of support were the norm in politics, Ron Paul may have run against Barack Obama rather than John McCain. So is this a good measure to use?

      Thanks for your interest in our research.

      Thanks,
      Ben

      March 4, 2010 at 3:31PM EST
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan Ben - You don't have flawed statistics. You have flawed *logic* driving the statistics. Intensity of support doesn't make you buy two albums or three tickets to a concert. But it makes you buy an album where you might have only bought a single. It makes you go to a concert, where you might only have bought an album. It makes you go see a movie if an "Idol" veteran is in it where you might only have bought an album and gone to a concert. You're polling people, many of who aren't even invested enough to vote *once* for "Idol." And since, again, "American Idol" has never for a second had a presumption of mirroring one-person/one-vote democracy. Nor has the show ever stated that its demographics and audience mirror the American populace. Look. Don't get me wrong. I think it'll be interesting to see how your Bizarro World of "American Idol" Voting Results turns out, but like I said, the results won't be anything other than "If 'American Idol' were a *completely* different show, with a *completely* different audience and a *completely* different set of rules, here's how it would go." -Daniel

      March 4, 2010 at 3:41PM EST