Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: 'Torchwood: Miracle Day' - 'The New World': Everybody lives!

Death takes a holiday in the sci-fi series' return

<p>Oswald Danes (Bill Pullman) prepares for execution in "Torchwood: Miracle Day."</p>

Oswald Danes (Bill Pullman) prepares for execution in "Torchwood: Miracle Day."

Credit: Starz/BBC

"Torchwood: Miracle Day" just aired its first episode. I offered a general review of the series yesterday, and I have some specific thoughts on the premiere coming up just as soon as I cheat painting a wall...

I imagine my posts on this series (or miniseries, or whatever we're calling it) will be more discussion-starters than in-depth reviews, both because it's all part of one large tapestry that I've seen a significant amount of, and also because what I've seen of "Miracle Day" was pretty uneven, and typifies various flaws in Russell T. Davies' writing style that were familiar during his tenure on "Doctor Who" and the early days of "Torchwood." (Though I found the ending of "Children of Earth" a bit rushed and problematic, the four hours leading up to it were about my favorite thing Davies has done.) But we'll see.

In terms of our introduction to this new version of the franchise, it was obviously designed to be as accessible as possible to newcomers. So we spend lots of time with our new American characters, with Captain Jack first popping up halfway through and his previous adventures with Gwen largely hinted at.(*) And the Americans at this point are a mixed bag. Mekhi Phifer's Rex is the typically smug and abrasive Mekhi Phifer character dialed up to 11, Bill Pullman's child-killer Oswald Danes is creepy (but at times distractingly so), and Alexa Havins' Esther Drummond mainly is there to give and receive exposition so far.

(*) And by doing it that way, the show can't really deal with the question of why Esther wouldn't be familiar with the various extremely public alien invasions, monster attacks, etc., that Torchwood and/or the Doctor have dealt with. Under Steven Moffat's leadership, "Doctor Who" has tried to say that history was rewritten so that only the Doctor himself (and perhaps other people involved at the center of those events) remembers that stuff, but it's a can of worms a new version of this show can't even open, even if it's a little distracting to those of us who've been watching from the beginning.

Unsurprisingly, the scenes involving the main cast that worked the best tended to involve Jack and/or Gwen (and Rhys). That those also happened to include the premiere's two big action numbers (Jack and Esther at the CIA archives, and then Jack and Gwen shooting it out with a helicopter) also helps, of course, but I have a greater investment in those characters and even as Davies and company are trying to open up the world for newcomers, it's clear their affections are still strongest towards the old gang from Cardiff.

As I said in the review, the parts of the miniseries I found the strongest tended to exist outside the plot and mainly dealt with the different ways the miracle works (the severed head was suitably gross) and how society responds to it. The one nitpick I have so far is that everyone seems to accept Jack's newfound mortality based on very little evidence. Just because he can get cut or bruised without it instantly healing doesn't mean he's automatically the only mortal man on Earth - it seems just as logical to assume that he'd be in the same situation as Rex and everybody else, where he can get hurt but can't die - but the plot requires us to assume Jack can die, and so we just have to.

Our first hour in, what did everybody else think?

Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Patrick

    Any idea if it'll be streaming on Netflix? If not, who's going to watch it? Are there people who actually get Starz?

    July 8, 2011 at 11:19PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      AnnaB netflix doesn;t get it until Oct. I signed up for Starz @ $10 per month. There' a rebate you can send in for $25 provided you keep it for 3mths. Since the series runs 10 weeks for me it's worth it. In the end I'm paying $5 for a premium channel for 3 mths & getting my TW fix legally.

      July 8, 2011 at 11:52PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Nikkip If you have Netflix, they have a feature where you can watch the Starz channel on Netflix. There's no On demand feature, but you can watch the show when it airs, which is what I did last night.

      July 9, 2011 at 5:53AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DonBoy Holy Mahoney! I had no idea that's what "Starz Play" meant! Works on my PC, now I have to see about my Tivo and Wii. Thanks!

      July 9, 2011 at 5:40PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Sareeta I don't see Torchwood listed under Starz Play on Netflix. Do you have to log in when it is airing on Starz?

      July 9, 2011 at 6:57PM EST
    • Desktop1_talkback_profile

      The Noble Robot Yeah, Netflix doesn't advertise that they have "StarzLive" because I assume it's a contractual loophole in order to offer the Starz on-demand library. The player is Windows Media-based instead of Flash or Silverlight, which both have better quality and streaming technology.

      Furthermore, it doesn't ever seem to work, and tech support doesn't even know it exists.

      July 10, 2011 at 5:02PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Sareeta Yeah, I tried watching StarzLive and the only thing that seems to work is every hour on the hour a promotional video for Starz channel. Otherwise it says "Feature not available" or something.

      I called Netflix about it and they acted like it's not their problem. I complained to the guy's supervisor that they should either fix it or remove it from their site if it doesn't work. Their customer service sucks.

      July 10, 2011 at 8:43PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DonBoy I used the wrong term above myself, so to clarify: "Starz Play" seems to refer to the general availability of the Starz library on Netflix. The "show me what's on Starz RIGHT NOW" is called "StarzLive", and is often blacked out if they don't have the exact right license for the current program. It's also only available on the PC platform, not the various other devices, EXCEPT that if you have a Windows PC with Windows Media Center (not the same as Windows Media Player) and an xbox, you can trick it into streaming to the xbox. Sometimes. See

      http://experts.windows.com/frms/windows_entertainment_and_connected_home/f/114/p/97993/516615.aspx

      July 10, 2011 at 11:18PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      webdiva I signed up two weeks ago on a Comcast deal that includes the first three months of Starz free, and if you quit before the 3 months is over, you don't pay for the subscription -- which is exactly what I intend to do, as Torchwood was my only reason for getting Starz.

      July 11, 2011 at 3:49AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    alynch

    "In terms of our introduction to this new version of the franchise, it was obviously designed to be as accessible as possible to newcomers. "

    As a newcomer, I think I can speak to that. I just treated the episode like a pilot and found the whole thing very engrossing. The premise was so good that it pretty much sustained everything. The only part where the episode lost me is when it basically sidestepped the main narrative for a good ten minutes to watch the British lady go through that whole "Just when I though I was out ..." routine. That ground everything to halt and didn't really serve any purpose since it was patently obvious that she'd join up with the investigators soon enough. I mean sure, it served a narrative purpose in establishing who the lady was, but it could've been done in about a third of the time.

    As for Mekhi Phifer, I don't think I'll ever not enjoy watching American characters being smugly dismissive of Brits. It's just a beautiful thing.

    July 8, 2011 at 11:19PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      webdiva Oh, I don't know -- I kind of resent the stereotype a little myself: I'm a first-generation-born-here American, and *I've* never underrated Brits, so I don't see any reason for them to slam me or mine. But it's a TV show, and there are plenty of Americans who underrate anyone who isn't American, so some sarcasm or lampooning is probably in order.

      But as far as I can see, Mekhi Phifer is just being his usual grumpy self, nothing more. He's as predictable on that as Omar Epps is on House: the two of them are just playing the same role over and over (or themselves), it seems.

      July 11, 2011 at 4:16AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    AnnaB

    I liked it. It's not as dark as TW_CoE, but it's good to have the show back. So far Gwen isn't annoying, but that may mean it's Sther's tunr. One thing I have noticed with RTD's writing is he likes to have a supposedly wide eyed plucky, yet slightly innocent serve as the POV for the viewers such as Gwen was initially and even what Vince was in QaF_Uk. Thing is I almost always end up disliking that particular character.
    Time will tell if this holds true.

    July 8, 2011 at 11:49PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      HydraEclipse Your killing me here, what does QaF_Uk stand for?

      July 9, 2011 at 12:07AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      The Burned Severed Head Queer as Folk (UK version)

      July 9, 2011 at 1:08AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      jojo Gwen has never been annoying. You just hate her never miss a chance to slam her because she isn't Ianto.

      July 9, 2011 at 8:22AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DonBoy Gwen's turned the corner to full-fledged grownup now, possibly with an assist from hair/makeup/wardrobe. If it adds to anyone's enjoyment, she shares a character name with Winnie (Gwendolyn) Cooper of Wonder Years fame. I just like pointing that out.

      Also: "It's not as dark as TW_CoE"? We have 9 more to go. That may be a premature conclusion, although it's a pretty high bar.

      July 9, 2011 at 5:44PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Sareeta Agreed. Gwen is annoying because she is whiny and overacts. Oh and who carries their baby into a gunfight?

      July 9, 2011 at 9:18PM EST
    • Jeff_avatar_2_talkback_profile

      Mulderism Not to mention the gap in her teeth. I really wish she would get that fixed.

      July 10, 2011 at 12:41AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      jan I'd much rather see real British teeth than the ones that all American "stars" have that are unnatural in color and configuration. I don't find Gwen annoying, but I've only seen the last miniseries and the first episode of this one, but what her teeth look like has nothing to do with anything. If you want to talk about her acting, that's another thing.

      July 10, 2011 at 4:36PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      webdiva On the contrary, Sareeta: your calling Gwen Cooper whiny makes me wonder if you understand the meaning of the word. Look it up, babe. If anything, Gwen is the one person on Torchwood who has NEVER been whiny. She argues (she was the conscience of the group and the voice of the average, non-alien-familiar straight, by-the-book cop on the team), she shoots straight (literally and figuratively), she's all business, and she does a lot of the heavy lifting on the team. But whine?? Oh, HELL no. Of course, it's just her and Jack now, along with a few still-clueless-but-not-for-long CIA agents, so she'll do more than her share of the heavy lifting (again), only this time with a baby to worry about as well. That's Gwen. If anybody's whining here, it's *you*, girl.

      As for *you*, Mulderism, so now you're holding Brtish actors to the impossible Hollywood standard of beauty? What, she should get that tooth-gap fixed to make **YOU** happy??! I think not! I don't think Eve Myles gives a damn what you or anyone else thinks of her teeth, and that's just as well. I find her relying on her own looks without such help refreshing. She makes Gwen seem like a real person among all those other not quite believable characters.

      And as for who carries her baby into a gunfight, that would be the badass cop-mom who found that the gunfight had come to HER, not the other way 'round, and she was damned well going to shoot whoever came after her baby. Good for her!

      I have no complaints about Gwen Cooper, and I hope she stays as straight-arrow and demanding of sense and justice as she always has been.

      July 11, 2011 at 3:40AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Phil Based only on the preview, Gwen overacts to an annoying degree (i.e. prompting me to post this).

      July 12, 2011 at 4:41PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    specialj67

    I'm just glad to have Torchwood back with new episodes, so I don't have any real complaints so far aside from the exposition-tastic feel to all of the CIA characters' scenes. It was a shout out to loyal fans having Jack use "Owen Harper" as his FBI cover ID--I totally had a smile at that. And watching Gwen with that rocket/grenade launcher thing was just as badass as I hoped it would be from the previously released production pics.

    July 9, 2011 at 12:45AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Bill in DC Gwen is the new millenia's Ripley. Someone hand her the next BFG and let it rip.

      July 9, 2011 at 2:23AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      webdiva Yeah, except Gwen still manages to smile and keep her sense of humor now and then. I like that: there's a place for gallows humor in Torchwood. Ripley was just grim from the word 'go' once the monsters showed up, and she never again unbent after that. Badass, yes, but stiff. That's not the way to cope.

      I, too, caught that in-joke shout-out to Owen. Made me grin, but it was lost on the newbies, of course.

      And yes, Bill, somebody handed Gwen the BF bazooka/anti-aircraft weapon so she could shoot down the 'copter this time. Cool!

      July 11, 2011 at 3:59AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    mj

    Why oh why are scifi fans in such a rush. There is so much crammed into the first ep to get everyone up to speed it doesn't make sense for a long sequence dwelling on Jack's mortality. Give the story time to play out. Jack isn't even sure he's mortal yet. He just suspects it. Just as when we discovered he was immortal, it wasn't something that happened with a bang we got a lot of hints and then we saw him live. Jack's immortality/mortality is for the fans not the newbies who likely went, huh? Or even missed the fact altogether. Besides, if you think about it a bit, Jack's mortality may be the point of the entire arc. Someone is trying to get him and using the whole human race maybe the only way...

    Can't agree about Rex. I thought he added a tough-guy, smart-ass dynamic that cut the grimness factor a bit. I don't much care for the new girl but I liked him.

    I can't tell you how much I liked that scene with Gwen toting the baby on one hip with a gun in her hand, shooting at the helicopter. It reminded me of Clive Owen in Shoot 'em Up, only the carrot was missing. That old dynamic that was so comfy was back between Jack and Gwen. I really missed it in CoE.

    I loathed CoE and vowed never to watch Torchwood again. This one could be a redeemer for me. As a long time fan it's not the opener I would have chosen but new network, new country necessitates some changes. RTD should keep in mind there are people that live in LA and DC. Lots of them. Location, location, location...

    July 9, 2011 at 7:44AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Laura Why did you loathe CoE? How did you feel about the series before that? I'm not asking so i can beat you up over it, im just interested to know what you disliked about it and why MD was better for you.

      July 9, 2011 at 12:45PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Neve

    In contrast to Children of Earth, this did seem a little slow, but it has ten episodes to unfold its plot. They introduced the new characters well enough, but I did feel much more excited when they crossed back to Wales. It's sort of lost that spookiness that the original Torchwood had, and I think that might be due to American setting and the soundtrack.

    The coat Jack wears to the hospital is hilarious (it's shorter and makes him look like he's wearing a skirt), and thankfully he changes back into the traditional one to brave the weather in Wales. Mekhi Phifer was suitable as Rex, and his complaining about the bridge was funny, but I did expect more laugh-out-loud moments in this episode. I particularly liked Eve Myles' performance in this episode, and though there are some who won't feel sympathy for Gwen, her sadness and suppressed nature in this episode were very tangible.

    July 9, 2011 at 9:18AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Leslie_talkback_profile

    OldDarth

    Since Jack was immortal before having the tables switched on him is easy to buy. Besides testing out that Jack is now mortal would be a one time deal. ;-)

    Solid start but the action sequences feel out of place with Torchwood. They also cut into plot time which is why I wager the episodes are getting that rushed feeling.

    July 9, 2011 at 10:16AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Abigail

    Any Torchwood is better than no Torchwood at all - my only complaint is that the opener was only an hour long; I think it would be have been better if it had been a 2 hour special, to introduce the characters and the concept - then carry along to the series. So far, so good. (Though I agree, for those of us already immersed in the Torchwood mythology, it was bit tiring.) Did anyone catch the name Captain Jack gave as his I.D.? Nice nod to my beloved Dr. Owen Harper.

    July 9, 2011 at 5:25PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Johanna Lapp

    Happy to see that Gwen put earmuffs on baby Anwen before blasting away with a series of big frickin' guns.

    The set piece where Jack and the CIA babe shoot out a window, run down a hall, jump out of a high floor and land in a pool to escape an explosion is an exact ripoff from the 1996 thriller The Long Kiss Goodnight," in heavy rotation on Encore this week.

    The ripped-from-the-headlines angle of a child killer cheating death to walk away from prison was a little eerie.

    I was also happy to see the CIA using rendition to advance the story line by bringing Jack, Gwen and Rhys to the States. If it's OK for Davies to do that, then I suppose George W. Bush is all clear. Amazing, the powers of retconn!

    July 9, 2011 at 7:02PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      webdiva Yeah, that whole Danes angle struck me as something out of Law & Order rather than Torchwood, and then I thought 'aha, maybe that's the American contribution with there,' so we'll see how they fit that into what's behind the phenomenon. As for his finding a following after his non-death, hey, I never understood how or why people fall in love with convicted serial killers, but some nutcases do. I take it for granted that his following *will* be nutcases, and probably dangerous nutcases at that. Yet another creepy angle to make things difficult for our heroes.

      July 11, 2011 at 4:47AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Hwat

    If it was anybody else I might have thought this episode looked like an interesting start (though fairly run of the mill) - but knowing its those guys, I'm expecting some totally stupid resolution at the end, and that makes me annoyed from the start!
    Oh well. Small problem.

    July 9, 2011 at 7:46PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    I. S.

    Bill Pullman's character gets a line that is so outrageous I can't imagine it ever being scripted in the USA. The joy of co-productions.

    July 9, 2011 at 8:57PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      webdiva Must have missed that, or else my reaction wasn't quite the same as yours. To which line do you refer??

      July 11, 2011 at 4:29AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      I. S. The one about the constitution being written "practically with me in mind". Seems to be one of RTD's Important Things To Say. Blink and you'll miss 'em.

      July 13, 2011 at 2:00PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Sareeta

    I thought the pilot was really good. The "miracle" itself is fascinating. Also, good for Starz to make a series that isn't full of rampant nudity, sex, and F-bombs!

    I like Mekhi Phifer's Rex because even though he is arrogant, he appears to be energetic and ready to jump on this case despite his physical condition.

    One thing I never understand is why TV characters think you can just chew up pain killers and take them with a quick swallow of water. You're supposed to drink lots of water with most medications. Pet peeve, I guess, kind of like drinking from an empty coffee mug.

    Anyway, Rex is the most likable character so far next to Jack.

    Captain Jack is fantastic. I love his personality. I was under the impression that he was shocked about his injury itself and that led him to believe he'd become mortal. I'm not familiar with this series. Is he an immortal who heals himself quickly after he's wounded? I thought he seemed surprised that the wound wasn't closing itself.

    Gwen, on the other hand, is exactly the type of female character I can't stand---whiny, screamer played by an actress who is overacting. However, I did like that action sequence and seeing her handle that big gun.

    The other character I do not like is Bill Pullman's. Actually, the character is fine but it's the acting I don't like. That speech the character gave to the prison guard (?) was delivered terribly. It was like Bill Pullman was struggling with the lines and running out of breath after every five words. It did not feel like the speech of a confident, cocky convict but of someone who didn't rehearse his lines properly.

    July 9, 2011 at 9:31PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      David Gwen whiny? No. Her husband is whiny.

      July 10, 2011 at 7:52AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Hwat Yes Sareeta, Jack has been an immortal previously, so you read that scene correctly.

      Has someone turned all of mortality on earth 180 degrees around, just to get at Jack? I guess we'll find out in the weeks to come! :)

      July 10, 2011 at 8:34PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Cal Considering all of the nasty chemicals Pullman's character has running through his body following the execution, I think it would be strange for the character to seem like he was perfectly healthty.

      Phifer's character survived the wreck, but he's obviously in rough shape, and just because we don't see any wounds on Pullman's outside we shouldn't assume that there aren't any internal injuries.

      July 10, 2011 at 8:43PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      webdiva I almost didn't recognize Bill Pullman, he's so bloated, squinty and pasty looking in the first episode -- but it sure fits the character. And I thought his delivery was appropriate to where the character was at that point: recovering from a godawful drug-death gone wrong, with all the attendant wretched side effects. If he looked and sounded like death warmed over, it's because he was: he was the walking dead, at that point, still loaded with death-drugs.

      July 11, 2011 at 4:54AM EST
  • Jeff_avatar_2_talkback_profile

    Mulderism

    I wonder if they are going to tone down Captain Jack's sexuality? I didn't see any trace of it in this first episode.

    It would be cool if the Doctor had a cameo.

    July 10, 2011 at 12:46AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      David H good for Starz to make a series that isn't full of rampant nudity, sex, and F-bombs!

      Hey now, there's something to be said for both!

      I only regret that they don't have all their fun gizmos & gadgets from their base in Cardiff. But then they lost those in CoE. I still miss them, though. I'm hoping Captain Jack will have some secret CIA gadgets at his disposal.

      July 10, 2011 at 1:15AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    donald

    Glad I didn't read this before I watched. The political implications would have turned me off immediately, so I was able to watch it objectively.

    It was terrible.

    July 10, 2011 at 11:29AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    ed_duffy

    I've aways watched Torchwood as a substitute for Doctor Who during the long periods when that's not airing. And it wasn't until Children of Earth that I found the show to actually be kind of good.

    But man, after watching this first episode I'm strongly considering just turning it off and never looking back. If this episode is a sign of what to expect, it may just be the worst season yet.
    While the idea is kind of neat, the writing is atrocious. The acting horrible. And their attempts to make the show feel "bigger" (or more cinematic, maybe?) really just drill home that the show works best as camp when it's a small scale production.

    July 11, 2011 at 12:50AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Mark S.

    I enjoyed this show. I had never watched Torchwood before and this episode did a great job introducing everybody and setting up the plot. As I discuss in my review(http://whatmarkread.blogspot.com/2011/07/torchwood-miracle-day-review.html), the show is interesting enough that I'm excited to keep watching.

    July 11, 2011 at 1:05AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Puss_in_boots_320_talkback_profile

    JedyKnight

    even though i would have been fine with Torchwood returning as a series or miniseries set and produced in the UK, I'm with those that feel that this Torchwood US is better than no Torchwood at all.. i don't know if to mantain it light for new viewers they wont get into if Jack has ended his depression trip after TW_CoE, but it would be cool if for one scene Gwen asked him about it.. but at the same time, even though TW_CoE was an amazing mini series.. i hope this series doesn't equal the previous extreme darkness, specially in its conclusion.. it may end up turning it's fans suicidal.

    July 11, 2011 at 2:04AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Lynda

    I am so chuffed to see the return of Torchwood. I really did not like CoE. I just hated that they killed off Owen, Tosh and Ianto. Although I must say CoE was by far the most agonizing series end I've seen. I agree that they need gadgets and gizmos! Watching Torchwood US on Canada's Space Channel.

    July 11, 2011 at 2:09PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Henry

    Having been a fan of Torchwood since the first series, I have to say that the writing and general plot outline are inline with the series as a whole. But, from the very first few moments, there was a clear dip in production value, and most noticeably, in the editing style. Everything seemed to be in fast forward, and by that I mean that a significant event occurs and it feels like we are rushed into the next scene or plot point before the previous one has had time to register. I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and assume that's due to a lot being crammed into the "pilot". I'm yet to watch the second episode.

    Clearly, this first episode was aimed at new viewers, i.e. the American audience. But for long time fans, it felt like we were being hit over the head with the new characters and the fact that the show will be based in the U.S. THESE ARE YOUR NEW HEROES. YOU WILL LIKE THEM.

    P.S.
    I can't imagine Mekhi Phifer was to pleased to be thurst back into an E.R. within the first few minutes of his new show?

    July 17, 2011 at 10:26AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web