'The Wire' Rewind: Season 3, Episode 6 - 'Homecoming' (Veterans edition)
Bunk and Omar have a memorable chat, and Stringer and Avon are at odds.
Omar and the Bunk have a difference of opinion.
Before we get to this week's review of "The Wire" season three (and, as always, you can find my reviews of the other four seasons on the side rail of my old blog), I have to warn you that the dog ate my homework - or, rather, the MacBook ate my original, very long, obviously brilliant version of this review. I had hoped my local Geniuses could salvage the data in time, but it didn't work out. So due to scheduling problems and my frustration at having to start over from scratch, my review of "Homecoming" will be a bit shorter and rougher than it otherwise would. Sorry. My own damn fault for not backing up my data every five seconds.
As always, we're taking this trip down memory lane in two versions: one for viewers who have seen the whole series from start to finish, and one for people who aren't there yet and don't want later episodes and seasons spoiled for them. This is the veteran version; click here for the newbie-friendly one.
Spoilers for "Homecoming" coming up just as soon as you tell me if you want the Class A or the Class B uniform...
"Makes me sick, motherfucker, how far we done fell." -The Bunk
Bunk's confrontation with Omar in this episode is one of the series' most memorable scenes for many reasons. First, Wendell Pierce and Michael K. Williams act the hell out of it, whether Pierce doing Bunk's frustrated shadowboxing or Williams doing the red-eyed stare with spit dangling off his chin as Omar tries to conceal just how badly Bunk's words stung him. Second, it's rare to see The Bunk - usually the comic foil to McNulty, or else a representative of how the more traditional way of policing can still work if you're smart and dedicated and lucky enough - become so serious, and so angry about anything. Third, Omar is the only character the show ever comes close to romanticizing - everyone else has to live by the real world's rules, while Omar gets to make up his own code and be damned charming doing it - and so it's startling to have him treated not as the lovable rogue we all know, but as a blight on the community every bit as bad as Stringer or Marlo.
And in that scene, Bunk captures the frustration that so many of the show's characters feel about how bad things have gotten in Baltimore, and in America. "Wire" characters often lament the loss of the good ol' days (Sobotka talking about the glory days of the port of Baltimore, for instance), but Bunk doesn't try to paint the past in brighter colors than when he lived it. There was crime and there were bad men when he and Omar were growing up, but they were never this bad. They had standards. They viewed The Game as something they had to play, not something they necessarily wanted to, and they tried to draw a line to keep out the salvageable kids like him.
If things were bad then, they're vastly worse by this point. Marlo is colder and more ruthless than Avon (who doesn't encourage Cutty to leave the life but also respects the choice and doesn't stand in his way). Contrary to Poot's boasts to Herc and Carver, the new generation is scarier than the one before it. Bunny goes to see Mrs. Hazel, the last citizen in Hamsterdam, and she scolds him with talk of what Vincent St. was like when she and her husband moved in(*). You see the Baltimore of today, and you understand why a man like Bunny Colvin might be moved to try such an insane gambit as Hamsterdam.
(*) And her talk of how her husband bought the place with money from his factory job was a nice callback to season two's meditation on the death of the industrial working class.
And we see in "Homecoming" that so far, the crazy experiment is working. Though Marlo's crews are still operating outside the free zones, and warring with Avon's, much of West Baltimore becomes a relative paradise compared to even a few episodes ago. The streets aren't dominated by the sounds of drug markets, but kids playing, laundry being hung, gardens being tended to, etc. It's not what life once was, but it's a start.
Want More...
The Wire season 3 (veterans)?
- Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.
Stringer wants to be a businessman, and Avon wants to stay a gangster, and it becomes an argument where each man has some of the high ground. Stringer's right that war with Marlo will only cost bodies and bring attention from the cops, and he's proven that territory doesn't matter as much as it used to thanks to the New Day Co-op. But Stringer is so focused on his dreams of respectability - he gets a glimpse of Hamsterdam and sees it as the culmination of his fantasies about being just another businessman, not having to worry about cops or violence - that he fails to recognize what Avon does, which is that Marlo Stanfield is even less interested in business than Avon is, and will keep pushing until someone pushes back, hard. It's one thing to be able to sell with bad territory, but no territory?
Avon is so fixated on the Marlo problem that he barely hears Stringer's attempt to tell him about Hamsterdam, and we see that Marlo is the next generation of Avon. Avon admits that he never expected to live long enough to have to worry about the kind of opportunities Stringer puts before him, and Marlo tells his advisor Vinson that he doesn't care if his reign is short, so long as he gets to take his turn wearing the crown. There were complaints when Marlo was introduced that he wasn't as charismatic or colorful as Stringer or Avon, but that's the point. He's the end product of the culture those two helped create. Stringer and Avon grew up in the world that Bunk did, and so they remember a life where drug trafficking didn't dominate. They have outside interests, be it upward mobility or family. Marlo cares about nothing and no one but playing The Game until he's crowned the winner, and Jamie Hector does a nice job with his stillness and understated delivery of showing just how dangerous that kind of tunnel vision can be.
Cedric Daniels, meanwhile, is at war with himself over his past and his future. He admits to Ronnie Pearlman that he turned out to be a better cop than a politician, yet he still feels a debt to Marla that he has to pay, even as it hurts his new girlfriend. And while he's doing a fine job as the leader of the forward-thinking Major Crimes Unit - and has a point when he tells Jimmy and Kima that so long as Stringer isn't dropping bodies, he shouldn't be their problem (unlike McNulty, he doesn't take these things personally) - he still lets himself get caught up in another chain-of-command argument with McNulty, and has to be forced into going after Stringer when McNulty uses his past boss to manipulate his present one. As with all Daniels/McNulty arguments, both sides have a point - Jimmy is an insubordinate ass who doesn't appreciate the man who got him off the boat, while Daniels lets his frustration over those things blind him to a good case staring him in the face - but Jimmy, as so often happens, gets his way in the end.
And Cutty, speaker of old-school gangster truths, finds out that his past life isn't what he wants his present one to be when he can't bring himself to kill Fruit. Avon is absorbed in the soldier life, but he understands what his old friend is telling him at episode's end. Slim Charles wistfully says that Cutty used to be a man back in the day, but Avon corrects him to say "He a man today."
We're now at the halfway point of the season (and the halfway point of the series, in a narrative if not entirely mathematical sense), and the MCU is only just now being officially assigned to go after Stringer. Even by the deliberate standards of previous "Wire" seasons, this might seem like an awfully slow build. But it's clear by now that the MCU's cases are no longer the series' driving engine - that Hamsterdam, and Avon and Stringer's battles with each other and with Marlo are at least as important to this season, if not moreso.
Now we get to see what happens with all the pieces in motion.
Some other thoughts on "Homecoming":
- The opening sequence with the Western cops abusing their authority at Bunny's behest to punish the non-Hamsterdam dealers is hilarious, but also interesting when viewed through the lens of all of this season's 9/11/Iraq undertones. Bunny - who does this both to push the dealers and to keep his men motivated by providing them heads to knock - is presented as the hero of the season, but here we see him encouraging the same kind of civil rights violations in the interest of a greater good that became so controversial in our world after 9/11. (And a reminder, as always, that while we can bend the No Politics rule to an extent when discussing this show, it has to be within the context of the show. Over the last few weeks, I've had to delete several comments that have had nothing to do with "The Wire" itself and everything to do with various commenters' feelings on a pet issue that was mentioned on the show. That's not okay. Focus on the show, and be respectful of each other, and this will all work.)
- I got a couple of good chuckles at material relating to the show's two most prominent gay characters, with Kima mocking Jimmy's wandering eye at the lesbian bar and Dante and Omar watching a Keller/Beecher scene on "Oz" together.
- Is the HIV fundraiser scene the first time we hear Clay Davis utter his own marvelous pronunciation of "sheeeeit"?
- Speaking of that scene, we finally see how Tommy thinks he can win an election, by using buddy Tony Grey as a tool to split the black vote enough for him to slip by Royce. Not a very nice thing he's doing to a friend, but then Tommy - other than rare humanizing moments like his ultimate reaction to why the kids put a sandwich in the VCR - is mainly thinking about himself, isn't he?
- I'm sure the scene where Avon and Slim discuss potential muscle for hire was as scripted as every other one on the show, and that the nicknames being tossed about are all lifted from actual Baltimore criminals. But there was a moment (around the time the name "Eggy Mule" was used) that I began to imagine that the director had simply told Wood Harris and Anwan Glover to improvise as many silly names as they could think of.
And now we've come to the veterans-only section of the review, where we talk about how events from this episode will play out down the line:
- Clay Davis and Andy Krawczyk's long con on Stringer begins to take shape here, as he makes the mistake of meeting Clay without Maury Levy in the room. And Avon, for all his disdain for the business life, is absolutely right about all the scams that run rampant in the construction business. It's all in a different game.
- Snoop, like the rest of the Stanfield crew, gets a very low-key introduction, given how important she would be down the road. She's just there at the rim shop, hanging with Marlo and Chris.
- Cutty spares Fruit's life, but he only buys the kid a bit of time, and in the process sets in motion the chain of events that will destroy Randy. If Fruit dies in that alley, then Fruit doesn't steal Lex's girl, Lex doesn't murder Fruit, Randy doesn't unwittingly help set up Lex to be murdered by Chris and Snoop, etc., etc.
- Tommy and Tony make brief mention of "Madame Council President" being next in line for Royce's job. This will come back to hurt Tommy after he wins, when Nerese holds a grudge because he cut ahead of her.
- In that nickname scene, note that Slim mentions the belief on the street that Brother Mouzone put a hex on the crew. It's a nice throwaway line to keep Mouzone's name in our heads before he returns later on.
- The dominoes keep falling for Brianna and then Avon to find out about D's murder.
Coming up next: "Back Burners," in which the MCU tries to figure out how to stop the Barksdale/Stanfield war, Bubbs takes a tour of Hamsterdam, and Cutty looks for a new direction.
What did everybody else think?
News From Our Partners
-
Robert Pattinson Talks 'Twilight,' 'Bel Ami' At Berlin Film Festival
'Ghost Rider: Spirit Of Vengeance': The Reviews Are In!
'Hunger Games' Film Shows 'Flashier' Seneca Crane
-
What Is 'Midnight in Paris'? Oscar Nominees 2012 Guide
Bret McKenzie Stars In 'Two Little Boys,' New Zealand's 'Dumb And Dumber'?
'The Secret World Of Arrietty' And 10 Other Hayao Miyazaki Films You Must Watch (VIDEO)
-
'Fringe': 'A Better Human Being' brings back memories and gives us new alts
Whitney Houston tribute at 2012 NAACP Image Awards
TV's Most Crushworthy Space Cadets: Nathan Fillion? Felicia Day? Katee Sackhoff? Vote now!
-
Weekly Ketchup: John Carter Sequel Already in the Works
Critics Consensus: Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance Hits the Skids
Total Recall: The Best of Studio Ghibli
-
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Friday, February 17, 2012
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - 30 Rock: Why So Serious?
-
Podmass: Week of Feb. 9-Feb. 15
AVQ&A: Great songs, terrible bands
For Our Consideration: Phasing out the skit: How hip-hop outgrew one of its most frustrating traditions
-
Sharon Knolle: 'Grey's Anatomy': Is Owen The Rick Santorum Of TV?
Linsanity Ends Knicks Blackout On Time Warner
Bethenny Frankel's Marriage Woes
About This Blog
All through his childhood, Alan Sepinwall's relatives told his parents, "All that boy does is watch television! How's he going to make a living doing that?" His career as a TV critic has been 15 years and counting of his attempt to answer their concerns. "What's Alan Watching" is a blog whose title is self-explanatory: Alan watches TV shows, then writes about what he watched. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching
HitFix Poll
Which multiple Grammy winner most deserved the accolades?
Latest Posts
-
What one line of dialogue stands out above the rest from 499 episodes?Saturday, Feb 18, 2012
-
'The Office' duo underwhelm with yet another celebrity-related mockumentaryFriday, Feb 17, 2012
-
As the show prepares to air its 500th episode, what's the one you love best?Friday, Feb 17, 2012
-
Liz tries to game the system, Jack reacts to a mugging and Jenna embraces a new normalFriday, Feb 17, 2012

Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signupnigel Write a comment...
July 9, 2010 at 7:35AM EST Reply to Commentnigel what i meant to say was great review Alan thanks. No discernible drop in quality there.
July 9, 2010 at 7:38AM EST Reply to Comment
I really enjoyed Avon's storyline this season even though he somewhat takes a backseat to Stringer. His line about Cutty; "He a man today," is just great, and says so much about who Avon is. As you pointed out, Alan, Avon - unlike Marlo, can see beyond the Game, and he can still have respect for a soldier like Cutty who just doesn't want to fight anymore. Avon isn't a good man by any means, but he isn't a complete monster either.
July 9, 2010 at 8:42AM EST Reply to CommentMarlo on the other hand just seems terrifying to me. He comes across as barely human.
I completely agree. I think if Cutty was working for Marlo and told him he was stepping down, Cutty would have been found in a boarded up vacant in season 4.
July 9, 2010 at 10:13AM ESThooksorpik@gmail.com I think it hearkens back to Slim Charles' line: "Game's the same, just got more fierce". Avon still can respect a man for being a man outside the boundaries of the Game. Marlo's more fierce, and probably would not do so.
July 12, 2010 at 2:47PM ESTAndrew Also in the foreshadowing, Bunk mentions that he saw kids pretending to be Omar. One of those kids he saw, Kenard, will kill Omar.
July 9, 2010 at 8:58AM EST Reply to CommentOn 9/11 / Iraq parallels, it's clear to me that Simon / Burns meant to portray Marlo as the insurgent and Avon as the US. But is there an intended Iraq War parallel with Colvin? Not sure I agree there. After reading many interviews with Simon, I don't know if Simon would even give credence to the idea that the US had "a greater good" in mind with the Iraq War. I think he'd more likely seek to portray us as trying to be the top drug dealer, or lashing out wildly after being attacked (like Avon).
Love the Cutty shenanigans in this episode. Why can't some fools follow simple directions!
sepinwall No, I'm not suggesting that Hamsterdam is to be equated with Iraq and The War on Terror in Simon's mind. More the notion that the Bush administration defended the stretching of civil liberties as means being justified by the end of beating terror, which they saw as a good in the same way that Colvin sees Hamsterdam as one. Viewpoints obviously differ about which end (if either) is actually worthy, but the principle is the same.
July 9, 2010 at 9:21AM ESTmjrhoff Thanks for identifying what show Omar and Dante were watching. It's one of those little details that I've always kind of wondered about.
July 9, 2010 at 9:46AM EST Reply to Commentmjrhoff Also, does it seem odd to anyone else that the scene in which Colvin tries to convince Mrs. Hazel to move comes before the scene in which he asks Col. Foerster for permission to get her a new place? Or am I missing something?
July 9, 2010 at 9:49AM EST Reply to CommentPaul B. Apparently she agreed to the move, off camera.
July 11, 2010 at 1:36AM ESTRha nah she didnt agree. Hejust went about it and pretty much is making her move. Happen where I live everyday
August 9, 2010 at 2:48AM ESTPamoya It is just another instance of how Bunny is willing to compromise to make his reforms a reality. He goes to ask permission after he's already set his plan in motion, and he lies about why it is necessary. Other characters do the same thing, usually when they have their mind set on something and refuse to see the obstacles in the way--think Stringer's after the fact attempt to get Avon to let the east side into the towers in season two. Or in this episode, Donette looking for Brianna's blessing to see Stringer when she's been sleeping with him for over a year.
March 19, 2011 at 12:59AM ESTJake This was the short, rough version?! The original must have been epic!
July 9, 2010 at 10:23AM EST Reply to CommentAvon letting Cutty go was one of my favorite moments for both of them, since it's never clearer that Avon has as much of a code as Omar. He has different priorities but on occasion is no less noble. Makes you wonder how Marlo would have handled that situation, considering Cutty didn't need to prove himself to anybody by then.
bossaking Alan,
July 9, 2010 at 12:13PM EST Reply to CommentI've been waiting ever since you were doing the season 4 reviews of The Wire to ask a question about this particular episode. It's been a long time. Finally I get to get this off my chest.
You mentioned briefly above that Clay Davis and Andy Krawczyk get stringer in a room alone to start the con, and without Levy to offer his guidance to String. Towards the end of this season, when String meets with Levy after Clay and Andy "rainmade" Stringer, levy tells him something to the extent that "I just wish you would have told me about this sooner" (in essence, Levy is implying that if he knew that Clay and Andy were going to rip of Stringer, that he would have stepped in and alerted Stringer to it).
Ok, so my issue is this. In the club during Avon’s homecoming, when Stringer is up and meeting with the business developers, and they are telling String about the wonders of investing in real estate, LEVY IS UP THERE WITH LISTENING TO THE CONVERSATION. Why wouldn't Levy have realized something was going on at that point and then alerted String to it? Was Levy in on the con? Was he just oblivious? Did the writers make a mistake? This has always bothered me when I watch that scene.
sckay levy knew that string was in busines with clay and andy but he knew they would not try to con him as long as he was in the room it was not untile stringer started to meet with them with out levy that the con started
July 9, 2010 at 12:46PM ESTStop Snitching It's all in the game.
July 9, 2010 at 1:15PM ESTLevy is both playing his own con and part of the systemic con that Davis and Krawczyk are involved in. Levy's goal is the long con, to extract money from all the legal business Stringer generates. Clay is willing to make the riskier short run plays. He can blatantly rip off Stringer because his position protects him from retribution. The real estate scheme was a long con where all three could bleed Stringer.
Maury makes his money on the paperwork.
Clay makes his money on the supposed permit bribes.
Andy makes his money on the delays and changes to the construction.
All of them were conning Stringer, all the time.
They were simply in competition. Levy would have stopped Stringer from participating in Clay's scheme because it would have been bad for his own plans.
bossaking Seems to me then that Levy would have said something to Stringer ahead of time, instead of the con being played out, and Levy saying after the fact "I wish you had said something to me earlier". I hear you that Levy might not have known the extent that Clay and Andy had dug into Stinger, but it seems to me, with the way it played out, that Levy was just oblivious as to the antics of Clay and Andy at one point of the season(when he definitely doesn't come across that way after String gets played and those two have a meet to discuss the shakedown).
July 9, 2010 at 1:15PM ESTI'm probably psycho-analyzing this way to much huh ;)
bossaking I totally agree that to some extent they were all playing Stringer, for sure.
July 9, 2010 at 1:21PM ESTMy only issue was the way that Levy was portrayed. The impression that was given was that he was oblivious to the antics of Andy and Clay, and then it such that he knew all along? If he knew all along, and wanted to continue to make more money of Stringer, then he would have said as much regarding the true merits and Andy/Clay directly (and privately) to Stringer shortly after Avon's coming home party.
Stop Snitching Clay addresses that in season 5. The lawyers will let him, Andy and others get a taste, but they'll stop you from bleeding them dry. In season 5 we know that Maury is representing Joe, Fatface Rick, Marlo and some other members of the co-op. When Joe is killed Maury is just glad that he brought him Marlo before it happened. I think it was clear in season 1 that Maury is playing the game for himself. He basically tells Avon and Stringer that they need to clean up all the witnesses. This is not his first rodeo. He knows how the money side of the game is played. I always assumed that he's the one who introduced the Barksdale gang to Clay and Andy. He knows that Clay and Andy are con men. At most he expected a gentleman's agreement not to do anything to obvious. He can't issue a preemptive warning or Stringer will reevaluate all the people he's dealing with. Remember that Stringer really believes that Clay is passing around cash bribes.
July 9, 2010 at 4:06PM ESTAvon sees that the construction business is a rip off. He knows they're being manipulated. But Stringer is too invested in his image of himself to realize he's being played. That's part of why he is so upset when he finds out about Clay's deception.
bossaking That's some real good insight, especially the part about season 5 regarding what Clay tells Lester when Lester is shaking him down ("The lawyers will let him, Andy and others get a taste, but they'll stop you from bleeding them dry").
July 9, 2010 at 6:21PM ESTThanks!
JeffL Like Jake said above, Alan, if this is 'quick' review, the first must have been a masterpiece!
July 9, 2010 at 10:46PM EST Reply to CommentI remember watching this season when it first aired, thinking Jamie Hector was a lousy actor. Marlo was so devoid of emotion, I just thought Hector was stiff as a 2x4. But now, having seen the depth of Marlo (especially "My name is my name!"), and the ease in which Hector turns it off and on, I see all the nuance he put into the role. It's a dazzling display of understatement.
Drew Johnson Al
July 9, 2010 at 11:36PM EST Reply to CommentYou should never have mentioned the inadvertantly deleted review! Now I will always wonder about what it might have contained!
I had been waiting for this review for a while as this is my favorite episode of my favorite show and the scene between Bunk and Omar which you referenced first in the review is my favorite scene of all time!
As you point out, I feel that it was exceedingly audacious for any character to be so critical of Omar. Additionally, Bunk is my favorite character on the show and I always enjoyed the scenes between these two characters. The episode's writer, Rafael Alvarez, wrote the first meeting between them in Season One.
I also loved the scene between Cutty and Avon and Slim Charles in which Cutty announces his retirement from the life.
I liked your citing of Mrs. Hazel's mention about her husband purchasing their home with money from his factory job and its resonance with Season Two's commentary on the death of labor.
I was also impressed by your conclusion about how Cutty sparing Fruit would later have a negative impact on Randy's life.
I received much amusement from the Western District officers harrassing the low level dealers and hoppers at the beginning of the episode. I had little sympathy for them as they were warned in advance repeatedly.
I am so glad that you are doing these reviews of Season Three! Thanks!
Narrim I think it's not on Cutty, Fruit, or Lex that Randy's life turned into a trainwreck. It could've happened any other day he decided to be a businessman at the corners and Little Kevin was too much of a wuss to do his own job and instead got some corner kid to do it for him while buying a candy bar.
July 11, 2010 at 6:53PM ESTIf Fruit was already dead, and either Lex went psycho on somebody else someone else in that group warranted some payback from Marlo, as long as Little Kevin was buying candy from Randy, Randy was going down.
But I definitely see your point. All the pieces matter. It's like how Bunk was talking about seeing those kids mimicking Omar in the streets when Tosha got shot. If Kenard didn't see the shootout go down, maybe he wouldn't have ended up killing Omar. He'd probably still be a sociopath, but the mythic Omar that he conquered wouldn't have been such a big thing. Hell. Maybe he wouldn't have even recognized him.
AudioLoveMagic Hey Alan. Another suggestion for rewind treatment - Avatar: The Last Airbender. I'd heard nothing but good things, so I finally tried it out. I just finished a marathon and I have to say, it's fantastic!
July 11, 2010 at 11:43PM EST Reply to CommentI went online looking for reviews, but I haven't found anything, which made me wish there was something like your reviews for the show.
Based on reading you for years, our tastes are similar, so I think you'll dig it.
lztouchthedream Great review, as always.
July 12, 2010 at 1:51PM EST Reply to CommentThe scene between Avon and Stringer in the funeral home that the opening quote came from is one of my favorites, and one that gets infinitely better in repeated viewings. I've seen each episode probably 3 times by now and only just noticed the way Wood Harris plays the moment when Stringer is telling Avon about Hamsterdam. He does such a good job of not outwardly looking like he wasn't paying attention to String, but also making the reveal that he wasn't completely believable.
Also, the scene chokes me up, because it really is the end of their relationship. Before there was still that energy of Avon being home from prison to gloss over the differences, but in that scene their clearly diverging philosophies about the game clash so totally and beautifully, and once you know how their stories end, it just breaks your heart.
Cy Cy [Alan once gave me permission to comment over more than one post. Finally will.] A few quotes from Kofi Buenor Hadjor's "Another America: The Politics of Race and Blame":
July 13, 2010 at 2:53AM EST Reply to Comment"The 'war on drugs' has really been a war on the ghetto communities, a war of occupation in the inner cities."
"The endpoint is that the authorities and the police reinforce their right to use violence and their control over the lives of Black people in the inner cities. That is the ultimate consequence of the racially loaded anti-crime crusade in America. It is not about solving the problems of society. It is about criminalizing sections of that society, and militarizing the methods that can be used to contain them, and exploiting public fears to consolidate a conservative climate of support for the authorities in their war against the criminal 'underclass'."
"No doubt gangbangers are guilty of many things. But they didn't create the ghetto; in many ways, it created them. Drug pushers and pimps leech off the poor and the powerless. But they did not institutionalize poverty in the inner cities; they just exploit its consequences."
"The petty criminals and anti-social elements of the ghetto did not invent narcotics or the art of the rip-off. Big business did that for them. Nor did they make violence an integral part of American life. This surely has a lot more to do with those who wield power at the top of American society...."
"Is it the neighborhood gangs and their feuds, or the city hall gangs who have created ghettos that look like battle-scarred war zones, complete with a police army of occupation?"
"What gives the corrupted and discredited elites of American politics and the media the right to sermonize about the morals and behavior of those whom they oppress, and to enforce their will through a police army of occupation?"
You don't have to agree with these quotes. Such is the neoliberal (Hadjor calls it "post-liberal") hegemony today that many if not most of you probably find them absurd. But one thing is beyond question, David Simon (and probably Ed Burns) would not disagree in substance with them, which suggests that there is something wrong with Alan's review. So onto Bunk v. Omar that Alan uses as his jumping off point for his foray into ...
the blame game.
July 13, 2010 at 2:57AM EST"Omar is the only character the show ever comes close to romanticizing - everyone else has to live by the real world's rules, while Omar gets to make up his own code and be damned charming doing it - and so it's startling to have him treated not as the lovable rogue we all know, but as a blight on the community every bit as bad as Stringer or Marlo."
Well, no. Maury Levy in episode 6 of season 2: "You are amoral, are you not? You are feeding off the violence and the despair of the drug trade. You are stealing from those who themselves are stealing the lifeblood from our city. You are a parasite who leeches off...."
Back to that in a bit. But, first, to accept Bunk's "lecture" as convincing is to reject the entire case The Wire makes that the law-and-order BS is a ideological justification for the haves, for capital, to marginalize those economically no longer required to make the wealthy their money in the new world order of neoliberal capitalist globalization, as a "pretext for a highly militarized policing operation designed to contain and control the disenfranchised communities of the inner cities" (Hadjor) behind the thin blue line, behind the wire: "The title really refers to almost an imaginary but inviolate boundary between the two Americas, between the functional, post-industrial economy that is minting new millionaires every day and creating a viable environment for a portion of the country, and the other America that is being consigned to a permanent underclass" (Simon). Containment in the prisons or behind the wire, that is new world order's answer to the nuisance of the economically unneeded in post-industrial American cities.
What you are witnessing in this bench scene is a representative of the black middle class—but not just any representative, like Maury Levy Bunk is a representative of the system of "law and order"—cynically, if artfully, shifting the blame for the blight of ghetto communities of Baltimore to the violence of the underground economy, an economy that is the only viable source of income and meaning for those trapped inside "here" and with no way to get to "there," blaming the victims. The linking of Bunk Moreland to Maury Levy is not so subtle so it surprises me that Alan, who loves pointing out parallels, missed it: the links between Omar on the stand and Omar on the bench, between Maury's diatribe with "you are a parasite" and Bunk's with "predatory mother------s like you," and so missed the meaning of the encounter between Omar and Bunk. Bunk and Levy are linked as representatives of a corrupt and illegitimate system: Levy serving the interests of those who dominate and exploit the misery of the ghetto through the drug trade and Bunk serving the interests of those who dominate and exploit the misery of the ghetto through the law-and-order crusade.
Alan left out a lot (perhaps some of it can be recovered from his dog's poop): not questioning Bunk's motivation and sincerity (as Butchie did), not raising the issue of the legitimacy of the police and the legal system, not mentioning Omar's scathing, "Shit, way y'all lookin' at things ain't no victim to even speak of" (which is probably the first time we are made aware of Omar's contempt for the police) and how Bunk's lecture begins with a deflection of Omar's correct point about the selective pursuit of “justice†by the police, not mentioning the grieving family of Tosha (that Bunk cites to Omar) disdainfully pushing away Bunk's card, his justice, as if it was diseased. Worst of all, not a word about the gun. When Levy accused Omar we know how Omar retorted; we get to watch Omar puzzle over how to respond to Bunk. Omar would of course know the absurdity of and reasons for the search for the gun. The gun is his retort, presented to Bunk wrapped in the tie—another … hmm … tie between the trial and bench scenes—that Omar wore mocking the dress code and in symbolic mockery of the justice system at Bird's trial. (Wouldn't it have been good if Bunk had left the gun with Butchie and taken the tie? Not The Bunk.) Bunk's discomfort at the press conference of lies was more satisfying to watch than a frustrated Maury Levy slamming shut his briefcase at Bird's trial. Clever policeman, cleverer rebel. Bunk should have stuck to tricking unsophisticated and legally unrepresented teenage boys with mind-reading copying machines.
Unfortunately, from his interpretation of the bench scene Alan's review slips into the conventional blaming of "the children of deferred dreams and defeated equality" for whom "decent jobs are the price for negotiating a humane end to drug-dealing and gang violence" (Mike Davis, "City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles") that Bunk's middle-class “black-lash†(Davis' term) expressed. If things are "colder and more ruthless" than before it is no escalating cycle of violence; that's the blame game Simon has no interest in. Things being worse is as a reflection of the new ethos (or return to an old ethos) of America, the righteous pursuit of self-interest:
July 13, 2010 at 3:01AM EST"It is important to understand that the underground economy and the violence emerging out of it are not propelled by an irrational cultural logic distinct from that of mainstream America. On the contrary, street participants are frantically pursuing the American Dream. The assertions of the culture-of-poverty theorists that the poor have been badly socialized and do not share mainstream values is simply wrong. In fact, ambitious, energetic inner-city youths are attracted to the underground economy precisely because they believe in Horatio Alger's version of the American Dream. They are, in true American fashion, frantically trying to get their piece of the pie as fast as possible. In fact, they often follow the traditional U.S. model for upward mobility to the letter: aggressively setting themselves up as private entrepreneurs. They are the ultimate "rugged individualists," braving an unpredictable free-market frontier where fortune, fame, and destruction are all just around the corner." (anthropologist Phillipe Bourgois from his chapter 'In Search of Horatio Alger: Culture and Ideology in the Crack Economy' in "Crack in America: demon drugs and social justice")
Finally (if anyone is masochistic enough to still be reading) There is one character on the street who is not pursuing the current version of the American Dream, but mocking it in a transgressive challenge to those who dominate and exploit the poor and the weak (while apparently breaking something Alan knows and calls “the real world's rules;†I'm not familiar with those.) I'm going to avoid going into a discussion of the meaning of (“romanticâ€) Omar's rebellion for Omar (let alone its and his meaning within the thematics of The Wire)—about which Bunk and Levy could have no idea—because I can't discuss that meaning without relying on the very complex story of Michael Lee with its meticulous construction of the birth of “Omar†and I don't want to get into that (that would triple the length of all this) or the rest of the things in this review I disagree with, which is just about everything. (It's "Backwash" all over again!)
mjrhoff Since we're quoting things:
July 16, 2010 at 9:07PM EST"...In the sort of culture by which Omar is lionized, we realized something ugly was happening, which was that Omar was becoming utterly heroic. Rather than an iconoclastic myth and some of the things we intended, he had become a little bit outside or beyond the moral statement. So we wanted to start having Bunk reflect on that and start to acquire some genuine resentment of what Omar meant."
--David Simon on the audio commentary for "Dead Soldiers"
If you take issue with Bunk's statements, that's your own perspective. The show itself seems sympathetic, at least to some extent, with Bunk's point of view in this scene.
@mjrhoff I'm aware of this commentary, though importantly I think you mis-transcribed as "rather than an iconoclastic myth and some of the things we intended" what is: "rather than an iconoclast to the myth and some of the things we intended." What Simon called "iconoclast to the myth," I call mocking and transgression. I have never been the least interested in the spectacle of Omar but always fascinated by the unique masculinity they gave him, one that deconstructs the patriarchal (dominating, competitive, accumulative, etc.) masculinity that underlies the myths. I am pleased that in his "back story" (i.e. Michael Lee, who takes us to where we met Omar including giving Omar's unique masculinity and skill set foundations in experience ... contradicting the contention by some critics that Omar is supposed to be in some way less "real") the writers left out the spectacle, that is to say it was never essential to the character. But Simon was wrong to focus on the "sort of culture by which Omar is lionized" because as big a part of the problem of the popular miscontrual of Omar was the failure of critics to take the character seriously, to get caught up in the spectacle of Omar and not consider Omar's deconstructive challenge to the ideology underlying that culture (and indeed the current political order) and not consider his "moral statement" (or thematic meaning). That's pretty much still the case: "lovable rogue."
July 20, 2010 at 1:46AM ESTI have no doubt that Bunk genuinely resented the kids calling out Omar's name, it actually inspired him to rebel ... a bit. (It gave him something to do between drinking, whoring, betraying his family, waving guns around and driving drunk, parading around before the impoverished in designer suits ... when not setting them on fire ....) But in his "lecture" he went on about the breakdown of his community in which there was "no victim that didn't matter" and he associated that with whom he thinks Omar is, whom "the sort of culture by which Omar is idolized" thinks Omar is. And that I trust is where the show's sympathy ends. If Simon gave in to Pelaconos with the hero worship, he gave the other side with the gun, putting Bunk in that press conference. Bunk is what he is, a loyal soldier for a corrupted institution complicit with the prevailing political culture that is responsible for the demise of the neighborhoods of his nostalgia, an institution "warring on drug addicts and the users and the small-time dealers. They’re warring on neighborhoods. They’re warring on people who can’t stand up to them." (Ed Burns) Like Maury Levy, defense attorney, Bunk Moreland, homicide/missing-gun detective, is very good at his job. He closes cases and gives his bosses the numbers they need to keep the game going.
TJ At the rim shop Marlo tells Vinson, Chris and Snoop "Sounds like one of them good problems." Chris will repeat this back to Marlo six episodes later, again in Vinson's rim shop, after the crew learns they are being credited for Stringer's murder.
August 22, 2010 at 5:49PM EST Reply to Commenttim_isola Thats a great scene with bunk and omar, no doubt, but it always bothered me that this is where bunk decides to get angry and voice his frustration, with really the last person he should be doing that with, where as every where else he's the company yes man carrying water and taking shit and just accepting everything from the people who are the real problem and really deserve to be torn into....Bunk is very misguided here, sorry to say
May 22, 2011 at 3:06PM EST Reply to CommentRJH Something I just noticed on my second viewing: in the final scene of the episode where Daniels walks into Burrell's office and is to be told of his new drug target there is a sequence of shots where you can clearly see Daniels putting it all together. Before entering the room he asks a clerk if he has 'any idea what [the meeeting] is about' and upon seeing who is sitting around the table almost immediately understands what has happened.
August 30, 2011 at 5:25PM EST Reply to CommentJust awesome - the subtleties in facial expressions from the actors and the sequence of shots sells it perfectly.