Season finale review: 'The Office' - 'Search Committee': Cavalcade of stars
Too many guest stars, not enough laughs
Ray Romano was one of several celebrity job interviewees in "The Office" finale.
A review of "The Office" season finale coming up just as soon as I wish the puppets would talk more about the alphabet...
"Or, I don't know. Something always works out." -Dwight
Ever since the news started to break about Will Ferrell, and then Jim Carrey, Will Arnett, Ray Romano, etc., appearing towards the end of this "Office" season, I worried. I worried that Ferrell's presence would be a distraction during Steve Carell's final episodes, and I worried that a parade of big name guest stars would not only not fit comfortably into the world of the show but turn the finale into a disjointed mess.
I feel my fears were unfortunately correct with Ferrell's episode, and they sure seemed correct as I sat through last night's bumpy, awkward, great big mess of a finale.
"Search Committee" reminded me of those sketches "SNL" likes to do where there's really no premise at all, but rather just an excuse for every castmember to trot out their favorite celebrity impression. The search committee stuff wasn't a story, but a platform to let Arnett, Romano, James Spader and company wander in, do some schtick, and leave. I found Spader's persuasive evil genius to be somewhat amusing (though more from Jim's reaction to him), but the other guest stars ranged from flat (Romano) to just goofy (Carrey as the oft-discussed Finger Lakes guy). Ricky Gervais' cameo was particularly annoying, because the show used him so, so perfectly earlier in the season when David and Michael met, and then they went back to that well again and it wasn't nearly as good.
And the most frustrating part of the whole hour is that we just saw only a week ago how well this show is capable of functioning without either Carell or any other big guest.
I didn't care much about the Andy/Erin story, but then, I've never cared about it, as the writers have done a poor job of making those two seem three-dimensional in the way that Jim and Pam were back in the early days, but even isolated parts of that (Erin's puppet show, and Kevin's reaction to that) worked.
There are enough strong characters with established, funny relationships here(*) that I think the show can work just fine without Steve Carell. We saw a lot of evidence of that last week, and got to see isolated examples of it this week.
(*) And with Gabe going back to Florida, the branch's overpopulation eases a little bit. Now the writers either need to think of something funny for Jordan to do or send her on her way. Neither the branch nor the show needs an office manager, a receptionist and an executive secretary.
Obviously, the branch needs a boss. We know from last week that Dwight can't or shouldn't be it, this week didn't do a great job of selling Darryl's chances, and I still think Andy would be (as even he admits) such a safe and predictable choice that it wouldn't work. So if they want to bring in an outsider as boss, that's fine. And when they actually pick somebody and craft a three-dimensional character for them, I look forward to seeing how that works. This, though, was a very poorly-executed sweeps stunt, and an hour I'm going to try to largely ignore when pondering the eighth season.
I should also say that over the last few days, a few reports have surfaced that "The Office" producers have decided on their own frontrunner for the gig. That person could easily wind up with the job, or NBC might insist on someone else. We don't know yet. I generally treat casting news as a grey area in terms of the No Spoilers rule and lean on the side of it being okay to talk about, but this is all still speculative, and part of a cliffhanger of sorts. So I'm gonna do something different here, and devote a separate post where I can mention that person's name and briefly discuss whether I think they're a good or bad choice, and anyone who wants to can do the same. But for the benefit of the people who don't follow every news report and would rather find out in the fall - or, at least, find out when NBC makes the news official - we are NOT going to discuss that possibility, or even allude to the choice, in the comments here. Any comment that does will be deleted. Whole other post just for that, folks. Nice and easy.
So what did everybody else think? On balance, how did these last two episodes make you feel about the show's post-Michael direction?
News From Our Partners
-
Tolerability Index: This week we're barely putting up with The Killing
TV Roundtable: When My Boys tested its prickly chemistry by inviting some new faces to the poker table
The Walkthrough: The New Girl showrunners on topping season two’s big kiss (Part 5 of 5)
-
Hulu.com: 7 Things That Wouldn't Exist Without The Office
Larry Womack: In Defense of (the Original) James T. Kirk
'Storage Wars': Ivy Finds Giant Clam Shell
-
'Riddick' Trailer: Vin Diesel Is What Goes Bump in the Night
'The Simpsons' Taps Kristen Wiig For Guest Arc As FBI Agent
CBS Fall 2013 Schedule: 'Mike & Molly' to 2014, More Comedy Thursday, and 'Hawaii' to Friday
-
Demi Moore & Ashton Kutcher in $10M Tug of War
'Captain America: The Winter Soldier': Chris Evans, Scarlett Johansson, Anthony Mackie Spotted in D.C. (VIDEO)
Katie Holmes Attracts the Wrong Kind of Attention on 'Mania Days' Set
-
In Pictures: The Stars of Star Trek Into Darkness
Digital Multiplex: The Last Stand, Side Effects, and More
RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Ambitious, Time-Jumping Epic Cloud Atlas
-
What to Watch Tonight: The Season Finales of Arrow, CSI, and Supernatural
Grimm "The Waking Dead" Review: Dead On Arrival
CBS's 2013-2014 Season: New Nights for Person of Interest and Hawaii Five-0, More Comedy on Thursdays
-
Best Alicia Keys Instagram Photos – Picture Perfect
Taylor Swift Fan Arrested for Swimming Near Her Rhode Island Beach House
Taylor Swift vs. Pink vs. Rihanna vs. Beyonce: Whose Tour Costume Do You Like Best? – Readers Poll
-
The Telefile - TNT & TBS Upfront 2013: Reaping What Other Networks Sowed
The Telefile - Fall TV 2013: What's On When
The Telefile - New Girl: Wedding Do's and Don'ts
Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching
Latest Posts
-
Some experimenting, but mostly the same old, successful CBSWednesday, May 15, 2013
-
A badger gets loose at Cece's wedding, and Nick and Jess ponder their futureTuesday, May 14, 2013
-
Has the show solved Winston yet? What stories would she redo?Tuesday, May 14, 2013
-
Dan and Alan break down the first batch of fall schedulesTuesday, May 14, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup- 1
- 2
Next 102 CommentsKmarko
May 20, 2011 at 9:44AM EST Reply to CommentDid you actually post this?
sepinwall As opposed to... ?
May 20, 2011 at 9:49AM ESTKmarko I didn't see it originally except through the link in the other piece.
May 20, 2011 at 10:12AM EST
May 20, 2011 at 9:53AM EST Reply to CommentWhy do all the critics hate this episode? I thought it was hilarious, it was non-stop laughter for me. I have to agree with kmarko.
KansasDan I agree. With a few exceptions, most notable Catherine Tate and Gervais' lazy cameo, I thought it was one of the funniest episodes in a long time. I think with Carrell gone the writers can give more time to everyone, and that suits me jus fine. This cast works so well together that I don't even want a new boss. Maybe the idea was to throw all those choices out there and then see how everyone reacts before deciding what to do? If so, brilliant! We have the choice of keeping it like it is now by putting Andy, Jim, or Darryl in charge (my preference), or bring in a new lead that will take more time away from everyone else like Carrell did. From the comments I've read, most would prefer the former.
May 20, 2011 at 10:07AM ESTtimb Score, Jordan. It's like Alan don't watch the same show anymore
May 22, 2011 at 10:35AM ESTKmarko
May 20, 2011 at 9:54AM EST Reply to CommentBut anyway, I disagree--thought last night hit a lot more than it missed. It was obviously a one-off kind of thing, but each of the guest stars brought a little funny/quirky thing to the table that worked well. I was smiling through most of the episode.
Loved the Creed opening, the office-wide meeting that Jim lost control of, Dwight interviewing himself, etc. etc. Very strong.
Having said that, no idea who I'd want to take the part next season.
jamie a s
May 20, 2011 at 9:54AM EST Reply to CommentI really enjoyed this episode. The guest stars were zany and well utilized and made Jim's frustration near the end believable.
And James Spader... My god I was in stitches. He was like a love child from David Milch and the Dos Equis Man (stay thirsty my friends).
James Spader was brilliant.
May 20, 2011 at 9:57AM ESTbiff865
May 20, 2011 at 9:57AM EST Reply to CommentIt seemed to me that this episode was setting up an about face where Jim just buckled and took the job after Ryan's "speech."
dmk313 Ryan's speech and James Spader were the only two redeeming qualities of this super-sized disaster IMO.
May 20, 2011 at 10:51AM EST
May 20, 2011 at 9:59AM EST Reply to CommentJust an absolutely brutal finale to try to plunge through. How did the writers manage to eff things up so badly the past two seasons? They should have watched "Goodbye Toby" from S4 to remind themselves of how a season finale is supposed to be done.
Gervais and Arnett were the only two slightly amusing guest stars from this episode. The rest were completely wasted -- just like this season, with the exception of the way Michael went out.
Sorry -- James Spader was hilarious too.
May 20, 2011 at 10:00AM ESTSylko Spader WAS hilarious. Sooo creepy. But I thought Catherine Tate was great too.
May 20, 2011 at 11:28AM ESTChrissy I thought Spader was great and the rest were bleh, but mostly because he was the only one given something to play other than incompetence. There are other reasons not to hire someone, besides their being an utter nincompoop without basic interview skills. But other than Andy and Spader, every single applicant for this job would have trouble getting hired for Ryan's position.
May 20, 2011 at 2:05PM ESTCol Bat Guano Gervais was a complete waste in that bit. After reading his blog about the finale, I'm not surprised. I was hoping Catherine Tate would be the clear favorite, but they didn't do her any favors with the writing. Spader killed it though.
May 20, 2011 at 4:19PM ESTcs
May 20, 2011 at 9:59AM EST Reply to CommentI largely agree: too many guest stars. I still liked it though. Do you think they could have stretched this out over half a season ... have a series of mini-arcs with various people coming in trying their hand at being manager? And then make the decision sometime next season? Along those lines, I wonder how a recently unemployed William Shatner might fit into that role.
Jay S. Seemed to me that Spader was doing a Shatner impression anyway.
May 20, 2011 at 10:38AM ESTcs good point.
May 20, 2011 at 1:23PM ESTmk
May 20, 2011 at 10:01AM EST Reply to CommentThat episode was awful. The stuff with the regular cast was good but all the interviews were ridiculous.
Michael Does anyone else think that Jim Carrey could be the Scranton Strangler?
May 20, 2011 at 10:22AM ESTRyan
May 20, 2011 at 10:08AM EST Reply to CommentDefinitely disagree with you, Alan. Really enjoyed this episode. Was it a brilliant episode on par with the Parks and Rec shows that followed? No. But I had no problem with the cameos and thought that, while they were parodies, they were funny. And the usual staff really crushed this episode I thought. Jim as the de facto leader was strong and I actually thought that he was going to end up with the job by default at the end instead of the undecided ending. I'm actually not sure how you didn't discuss that in your review, as Jim's control of the situation was the most eye-opening and interesting thing for me. Going forward, if they do bring in an outsider, it is set up so that Jim is going to play a big part in that person succeeding or failing, I think.
Creed was a tour de force, and the same goes for Pam and Dwight. I actually haven't missed Carrell so far because it has given others a chance to shine.
My only negative was the way they made it clear that Daryl was hurting his own chances just like everyone else. I really thought Daryl was going to be it and I love Craig Robinson and think he'd be great.
Chrissy I like your point about Jim being important to the failure or success of the eventual boss. I'd like them to pick someone with a subtle enough understanding of office politics to see his value. It's always funny when Jim is surprised by someone else's intelligence.
May 20, 2011 at 2:13PM EST
I'm with you, Ryan. I read this review before I watched the show, and I was surprised at how much I liked the show. Sure, the guest star stuff was a bunch of stunt casting, but it was funny. And this is a comedy...
May 21, 2011 at 8:16AM ESTohonestly
May 20, 2011 at 10:08AM EST Reply to Commenti really hesitate to use the phrase "jump the shark", so i'll just say that at this point, i think i've given enough of my time to the show to feel okay about not returning as a weekly viewer next season. i kept waiting for this season to turn itself around creatively, michael scott paper company arc-style, but with little exception ("andy's play", "china", "PDA"), i've been disappointed. even the idea of getting some fresh blood in a managerial position makes me tired - the show has too many characters already, and too few long-term story lines in which to get invested. i get the sense that the cast and crew are kind of Over It, and i am, too.
Jobin Know where you are coming from, sadly I have trouble giving up on shows once I've been with them for this long.
May 20, 2011 at 10:44AM ESTIt sure does seem like they've been especially shaky ever since Michael Schur left to Parks and Rec.
Truck Ah, the moment in every US Office viewer's life where they have to make the decision to sever ties with their lost love. Like the guy above, I jumped ship shortly after Parks and Recreation started. I still catch parts of an episode here and there before P&R, but the way they beat you over the head with the joke explanations is a big turn off. It's like they're teaching us why the jokes are funny instead of just letting them stand on their own merit.
May 20, 2011 at 1:08PM ESTI wonder if moving P&R to 8:30 next season will hurt The Office. Nobody is going to want to eat Spam after a hearty fried turkey leg burger.
forg TRUCK: "I wonder if moving P&R to 8:30 next season will hurt The Office"
May 23, 2011 at 9:19PM ESTWhile is P&R is definitely the stronger show creatively than the Office it's just hilarious to think that The Office will be hurt by P&R moving back to 8:30, it should be the other way around as like it or not, ratings wise The Office is far ahead than P&R.
Kevin
May 20, 2011 at 10:09AM EST Reply to CommentI really enjoyed this ep in spite of the fact that many of the cameos weren't great. I thought Spader killed it (even though I'm not usually a fan) and Carrey was funny in the small dose at the end. I don't get the overall hate for this one. It seems like many went into this episode having already decided to dislike it based on the guest stars and Ferrell's problems.
Billy Bob
May 20, 2011 at 10:10AM EST Reply to CommentThe Office sucks, it's flat, it's uneven....Parks & Rec is awesome, incredible, the greatest show EVER!!! We get it already Alan, stop being a grouch and like more than 3 shows
Casey We get it already, Billy Bob, you don't like Alan's reviews. Stop reading, or actually contribute something, perhaps why you think the episode was good, so that it's a discussion.
May 20, 2011 at 11:27AM ESTJB
May 20, 2011 at 10:11AM EST Reply to CommentAfter all the hype about the "search for a new boss" and the "special guest stars", I was really surprised they didn't pick one. Maybe "surprised" is the wrong word....it is totally predictable for them to want to drag this out as a cliffhanger and not reveal the new boss until next season. I guess "frustrated" is the right word, since the indication I got was that the new boss question would be answered this season, and it wasn't.
KansasDan I honestly think the writers made the decision to put all these possibilities out there and then see what kind of feedback they got from the critics, and hopefully us viewers. And I think that's brilliant.
May 20, 2011 at 10:59AM ESTScott J. @KANSASDAN, I agree that was the writers' intent. But I think it's cowardly and unwise. Basing their ultimate choice on the audience's reactions to this episode would be akin to Jim letting the office vote for a new boss. It's the writers' jobs to figure out what's going to work creatively, not to follow the whims of the audience. Besides, they've already tested the insider candidates here and there throughout the whole season, as well as trying out an outsider candidate. They're well past due in coming up with a decision. I enjoyed the finale for the most part, but the failure to commit to a candidate is emblematic of the overall lack of direction in the show.
May 20, 2011 at 1:17PM ESTChrissy McNutt over at the AV Club makes the point that a lot of the tension drains when you recognize that many of the outside candidates aren't feasibly going to be regulars on this show next year, and I agree. I'd feel more optimistic about next season if they had already picked someone they were excited about and they were just teasing the reveal, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
May 20, 2011 at 2:17PM ESTKmarko I don't think there's any "tension" about the selection anyway.
May 21, 2011 at 10:44AM ESTScott
May 20, 2011 at 10:11AM EST Reply to CommentWhat is the point of Jordan (Cody Hall), other than the fact her father (in real life) runs Warner Bros.?
It's already pushing reality that a small, regional office even has three office assistants or managers (Pam, Erin, now Jordan).
Add to that, it seems like she adds nothing (basically a background extra).
Ben I don't know what Season 8 and beyond hold for Cody HORN, if anything), but it doesn't seem like her dad's position at WB would be relevant to The Office, since it's produced by Universal.
May 20, 2011 at 3:16PM ESTMatt
May 20, 2011 at 10:14AM EST Reply to CommentI think the point that was made here is that there doesn't necessarily need to be an outside hire -- that the group works well as it is. I thought the episode was very well written by Lieberstein, and I look forward to season 8. There is a boss that needs to be picked, there is Angela's relationship with the senator, there is whether or not Jim and Pam may have another child (due to Jenna Fischer's pregnancy); plenty of stuff to keep the show running and running strong. I think there were expectations that a boss would be made clear tonight, and since that wasn't done, some people view the hour as a waste. I see it as part of the process.
Amy
May 20, 2011 at 10:22AM EST Reply to CommentReally not a good episode. I didn't like any of the guest stars or the characters the played. James Spader came closest to being funny/someone I wouldn't mind seeing again, but everyone else was bad. I especially didn't like the Gervais cameo. He didn't come across as the "real" Brent to me...he seemed to be half-assing the part, like he didn't bother to get fully into Brent character.
I'm not reading the other post about the producer's frontrunner, but it seemed to me that this ep sort of planted the idea that Jim might step up and become the boss. That would be my choice, anyway.
Jobin
May 20, 2011 at 10:25AM EST Reply to CommentThey would have a lot of material if they had Joe decide that she was going to create some odd-no manger organizational style.
Then every branch decision would have somehow had to involed the whole office.
The biggest problem is that all the stories will be "Carrell leaving was the reason they showed sucked" when the show has been off for a while now due to poor inconsistent writing.
Evan
May 20, 2011 at 10:27AM EST Reply to CommentI thought the episode was hilarious. Non-guest star section, it was one of the funniest and that's the main takeaway. But even then, I greatly enjoyed the guest-star spots.
Jun
May 20, 2011 at 10:32AM EST Reply to CommentI thought this episode was just ok. The interviews were good (especially James Spader), but it did not have that spark that I wanted it to have. And then things got weird when Erin asked Andy out, and not "funny weird" either. I guess over all it was just ok for me. I liked last weeks better.
(I am kinda pissed about Gabe leaving. He was my favorite character. I mean, Jordan is on and Gabe is NOT! /rant)
I wonder what next season will bring...
Jobin
May 20, 2011 at 10:36AM EST Reply to CommentIt's a shame they didn't end the season at Michael's proposal to Holly. They burned up a lot of good will/faith with some of these unfunny post-carrell episodes.
Considering they never even developed Gabe, Erin, and even somewhat the Narddog, into any kind of characters that I can be invested in, care about, does not bode well that they will be able to develop the new boss character.
Jason Potapoff
May 20, 2011 at 10:37AM EST Reply to CommentI disagree Alan. I thought this episode was pretty good and other than a couple of guest stars (Catherine Tate, and Gervais) they did a good job. Spader was fantastic. I liked Romano's bit (begin tricked into blowing the interview was hilarious, his talking head where he says he always sabotages himself and says "in fact i was supposed to start a new job right now" was brilliant). Carey showing up for just a few seconds was a nice choice (and surprised me). I don't understand why you didn't like it.
Eric How can you possibly say that Catherine Tate's cameo was even the least bit entertaining? That was the worst guest appearance out of all of them; even worse than David Brent's.
May 20, 2011 at 3:41PM EST
@Eric: It happens that he was saying the opposite of that.
May 20, 2011 at 4:58PM ESTFuzzy Dunlop
May 20, 2011 at 10:38AM EST Reply to CommentI feel like the tones of the shows are so different this idea might not have worked, but I think it would have been hilarious to do a 30 Rock/Office cross over with Will Arnett reprising his role as Devon Banks. The plot could have been along the lines of Devon falling from grace with the Obama administration and being reduced to apply for middle management positions in places like Scranton.
dmk313
May 20, 2011 at 10:39AM EST Reply to CommentIt was awful. When Jim opened up the floor to comments it was all but a white flag by the writers who were showing their fatigue and lack of new ideas. Pathetic finale.
dmk313 The whole show was a chore to get through. The SNL comparison was apt. If you told me this episode was written in a few hours as a rush-job, I would have believed it. Disjointed and flat.
May 20, 2011 at 10:44AM ESTJeff Cagney
May 20, 2011 at 10:41AM EST Reply to CommentWhat we have here, in my opinion, is an absolute failure on the part of the writers of this show. Writers whom, for several years, were the backbone of the funniest show on television and one that seemed to be effortlessly and deservedly sliding into the role of "the new Seinfeld" as a beloved comedy that defined a generation of TV viewers.
But somewhere along the way, those writers either ran out of ideas or lost the eye of the tiger, because it has become apparent this season that they are all too willing to hand over the reins of their show to any pseudo-comedian who wants to come in and do a silly voice or be quirky.
I first noticed it with Ed Helms. In the beginning, Andy was a supporting character. But Ed Helms has been blessed with a modicum of musical ability, and when the writers realized this, it seems like they let him sing and dance in every friggin' episode, whether it pertained to the story or not.
Will Ferrell was an unequivocal disaster. At best, his character was inconsistent. At worst, he was distractingly unfunny. Regardless of which side you land on, he simply wasn't right for The Office. How did the writers not see this? Or did they see it, but they let him do his wacky routine and bring the show down to the sub-par level of Talladega Nights/Semi-Pro anyway?
The finale was a continuation of this lazy clunkiness, almost as though they said to Jim Carrey, Ray Romano, James Spader, etc, "Just come on by and do whatever you want. I'm sure it'll be funny." Problem is, it wasn't funny. And it felt out of place. And good writers who still had some juice left in their fastball would've recognized this and they would've left stuff like the painfully-pointless Ricky Gervais video on the cutting room floor.
I'm done with this show. In the blink of an eye, it's gone from my favorite show on TV to the 4th-best show on NBC on Thursday nights. How sad.
dmk313 Really well-put. The Gervais scene to me seemed like a DVD extra that never went anywhere. There's a sense of laziness with this show in general. Maybe all the creative juice has gone to Parks and Rec, making the Office an afterthought.
May 20, 2011 at 10:49AM ESTjayksee this show started going downhill once mike schur left with greg daniels to do parks and rec, apparently those two made the show what it was
May 20, 2011 at 6:24PM ESTTina Herman I agree with JAYKSEE that it's becoming increasingly obvious that Greg Daniels and Mike Schur (and possibly Jen Celotta who has also left) were, as JEFF CAGNEY put it, "The backbone of the funniest show in telelvision". Apologies to Paul Lieberstein, but what The Office really needs is a new boss in the writer's room.
May 20, 2011 at 8:21PM ESTClay
May 20, 2011 at 10:54AM EST Reply to CommentReally uneven, but I didn't hate the guest stars as much as I thought I would. Spader provided just the right amount of uncomfortableness to his scenes. Romano wasn't really a character, just a weird version of himself with glasses. The Katherine Tate and Gervais stuff was just waaaayyy off, which hurts to say because I love them so much.
I thought the regular office cast was pretty funny outside of Andy. Erin has been established as a cute insanely naive person which is fine, but Andy has been even more inconsistently written than Michael Scott. His reaction to Erin's sock puppet theater was just a stall tactic on the writers' part. If they wanted to "earn" the relationship they could've had Andy be so flustered and confused that he ran out of the room and threw up. That's what I think the character would've actually done. Instead the writers' basically announced that they have no idea where to take the character and made Andy cruelly reject Erin as if to say, "We're not going there yet folks." If Helms is going to be a long term character going forward they really need to let the character grow up.
Ray I thought his reaction was actually somewhat mature and showed some self-knowledge. An immature reaction would be to get back in a relationship with someone you resent that would be doomed to blow up down the line. The whole Gabe/Erin/Andy storyline seemed to me the writers saying "we hear you" to the fans and them wrapping it up.
May 20, 2011 at 12:40PM ESTCol Bat Guano God, I hope you're right. If I never see another moment of Andy and Erin I will not be sad. They have been pounding that ridiculous relationship for TWO YEARS and still have found a way to make it interesting or believable. Hey writers, they're not Jim and Pam, okay?
May 20, 2011 at 4:27PM ESTAL Re: Andy & Erin - It's hard to understand why the writers (A) spent all last season carefully building the bridge that jointed the two, then (B) inexplicably demolished that bridge at the beginning of this season, then (C) spent a good chunk of this season rebuilding that bridge, only to (D) come to the point where Andy basically stares at the newly reconstructed bridge and says "umm, no thanks." Frustrating.
May 23, 2011 at 10:59AM ESTJohn m
May 20, 2011 at 10:55AM EST Reply to CommentI typically agree with you on shows that dont hit, but actually felt this episode was much better than you give it credit. I feared the use of so many guest stars, but thought they did a good job of minimizing their impact and got a few good laughs out of it. Agree with you on all the parts with the regular cast that hit well, and I just think you are letting your contempt for the guest stars weigh down the episode too heavily.
I look forward to how they move forward next season.
Brandon
May 20, 2011 at 11:03AM EST Reply to CommentIs Paul Lieberstein ill or something? He's been looking more and more haggard throughout the season, in my opinion, but I think he looked really sick or something in last night's episode. Hope he's okay.
lifeofmytime I've been wondering that myself - the last 2 or 3 episodes in particular he has looked seriously ill.
May 20, 2011 at 11:43AM ESTKyleBlowers
May 20, 2011 at 11:10AM EST Reply to CommentAlan, your SNL analogies seem dead on. In a double-length episode there wasn't a moment's rest from any number of the bkd characters saying or doing something that ALWAYS feel shoehorned, and the plots seemed so separate and unrelated but involved almost the whole cast in BOTH I couldn't help feel like "Search Committee" was suffering from Tarantino-esque time-dilation...
In its strongest seasons the abnormal, hilarious, cringe-inducing moments from zanier characters like Michael, Dwight, Kevin, Creed, Kelly etc can seem wholly believable with characters contrasting against Jim, Stanley, (temp)Ryan, Phyllis, Meredith, Oscar, Darryl etc. having some level of "one foot out the door"-detachment. For me at least it's checks-and-balances in this reality that accentuates the reactions and absurdity and . It's like consciously trying not to laugh at something inevitably makes it funnier, having that restraintas background can make the situation funnier. Now it seems everyone is a big family (Oscar refering to Angela as a friend?!?? not a colleague?!) and seemingly all involved in the other's lives--- there's just no contrast.... to appreciate the sweet, you've gotta have salty kinda thing...
I DID like the callback of Jim's zero-control managerial woes (his breakroom "joke", everyone voting for boss, etc). Catherine Tate's extreme contradicting fad-management styles (no titles, everyone's a boss, zen etc) interview I actually LOVED and seemed natural to me. Dwight's interview was entertaining and very Dwight and Jim/Toby's reactions.
I don't know at what point The Office veered wildly off-track (my wife says S6's "MAFIA") but everything seems so sloppy and desperate it is just unpleasant. For me, this is the most disappointed I've been with television since FOX stopped promoting Arrested Development and cancelled it...
sayclark
May 20, 2011 at 11:11AM EST Reply to CommentI'm glad to see so many commenters feel the way I do about the finale (because usually it's mostly Alan's Army ripping the show right along with him). I thought it was really damn funny.
I didn't think the search committee stuff was great and the guest stars were pretty much all useless (except for Spader). But the show, by and large, made me laugh quite a bit. And that's, you know, kind of what I look for in a sitcom. Ryan was as funny as he's been in years I thought and the Jim-Dwight stuff was really funny, too. So was Kelly.
Is the Office is as good as it was 4 years ago? Nope. How many shows are? But it still makes me laugh consistently. And this one made me laugh quite a bit. Regardless of the poorly executed ratings stunt.
Q
May 20, 2011 at 11:17AM EST Reply to CommentI've thought this for awhile, but they really went too far with their dumbing down of Kevin last night. He doesn't know the alphabet, really? I don't find any of that stuff humorous.
sayclark Yeah. He's become a cartoon character. They had that funny bit a few seasons ago when Holly mistakenly thought he was retarded. Well, lord, was it really a mistake? He's so over-the-top dumb now that it seems like the writers have concluded that yes, in fact, he is retarded.
May 20, 2011 at 11:48AM EST- 1
- 2
Next 102 Comments