Film Festival

Review: The 'Lost' finale a year later

How you feeling in the other life, brotha?

Review: The 'Lost' finale a year later

Matthew Fox in the final scene of "Lost."

Credit: ABC

A year ago tonight, "Lost" ended with a two and a half hour finale that some found brilliant, some found maddening, and others fell somewhere in between. I definitely was one of the in-betweeners, trending more towards the good than the bad. I loved the emotional reunions, Jack and Smokey's final duel, Jack passing the torch to Hurley and some other story and character moments while being largely frustrated with both the revelation of what the sideways universe was and the lack of answers from the series as a whole. I wrote a review that night, then another one a few weeks later that nudged even more towards the positive while still not being pleased about all the time spent on the sideways, the Temple, etc. At the time, I wondered whether my opinion would change in a few months, or years, noting that I still thought about the similarly-contentious "The Sopranos" finale the way I did the night it aired.

And re-reading those reviews, and thinking on "The End," my opinions are mostly unchanged. But in another way, I feel even more positive about both the finale and the series as a whole than I did 365 days ago.

The 2010-11 TV season ends on Wednesday night, and it hasn't been an especially good one, at least not in terms of new shows and for the most part not in terms of dramas. It was an uninspiring crop of freshman shows, borne out by the fact that so few of the rookies are coming back next season. (As Linda Holmes pointed out on Twitter, between ABC, NBC and FOX, only one new show that debuted last fall is returning for next season: FOX's "Raising Hope." And even that might not be returning if FOX had waited a little longer to make the decision and saw how the numbers were going.)

Want More...

Lost?
  • Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.
So anyone who was hoping for some new series to come in and immediately fill that spot "Lost" filled in the universe was sorely let down by this group of mostly lame newbies - and perhaps especially by the "Lost"-esque - but in all of the bad ways - "The Event," which ends its unfortunate run tonight. "The Event," like so many other "Lost" wannabes over the last six years, was all sizzle and no steak: paper-thin characters involved in a shell game of a plot largely devoted to keeping viewers on the hook as long as possible.

And I know that's the reputation "Lost" had at times, and I know that it's easy for the people who hated the finale - who felt they were entitled to more answers than Darlton were willing or able to provide - to believe that was the case. But while "Lost" generated a lot of attention and passion from its mysteries, the show had a whole lot more to offer than that. It had action and suspense and spectacle the likes of which "The Event," "FlashForward," and "Threshold" (to name three of the wannabes) on their best day couldn't come close to. It had great characters, like John Locke, Ben Linus, Hugo Reyes, Desmond Hume and Sayid Jarrah (to name just a few).

Setting the mysteries and the oblique clues and frustrating answers aside, "Lost" mattered. "Lost" was grand and tragic and funny and exciting and a show that felt not quite like anything that had been tried before - and, based on where its ratings were by the end, and the struggles of all the shows to imitate it, one that may be unlike anything we ever see in the future.

Again, if you were mostly in it to find out who was in the other outrigger shooting at Sawyer, or why Walt was special, or if you were seeking a more complicated explanation for the many strange properties of the island beyond "there's a weird glow-y pool of light that looks like it belongs in an '80s movie with Richard Chamberlain and Sharon Stone," then I can understand the feeling of betrayal that came with "The End." But I look at the state of TV now - and the future of network TV in particular - and I worry that it'll be a long time before we get another network drama that's both this ambitious and, far more often than not, this well-executed.

"Lost" screwed up at times. (During seasons two and three, many times.) But it went for it. And I would rather have the memories of how I felt when the polar bear came charging at Sawyer, or when Jack told Kate they had to go back, or when Sawyer told Juliet "I got ya, baby" (twice!) far more than I'd want to get rid of whatever frustrations I felt with the polar bear cage episodes, or Dogen and Lennon, or finding out that Desmond didn't have quite the plan we all thought he did.

Like Christian Shepard told me to, I've been able to let go of most of the anger and reflect on the good times.

But I'm curious about the rest of you: one year later, how are you feeling about "The End" of "Lost" as we knew it?

Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
Next 193 Comments


  • Whatever happened, happened, and it will never happen again.

    In 20 years, I'll be able to drop "Not Penny's Boat" during a conversation as a litmus test of if I should be friends with that person.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:22PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      J http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l0jwi8UClI1qz80f1o1_500.jpg

      May 23, 2011 at 8:23PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Dave G

    It ruined it for me. I enjoyed the time I spent with LOST - I was an addict! - but the whole show built up question upon question upon question, only to completely abandon its promise (or near-promise) of answers. I felt like the last episode, while a wonderful few hours of tv, ultimately fell short of what the series set itself up to be. That was very disappointing.

    And I hate to put myself in the "What Happened to Walt?" camp, but when a show hinges itself early on the questions surrounding a main character, it can't then ditch the entire character and storyline just because it neglected to expect that a child actor would grow!

    May 23, 2011 at 5:29PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Jacob This is really weird because I just rewatched the Lost finale today and then happened upon this article. I disagree with you, Dave, that the show or the finale was a failure because it did not answering all of our questions. The questions were interesting; the answers might not have been. I don't care that I don't know why Walt is special or how every single rule of the island works. In some cases, I felt like I learned more than I needed to (the Jacob/Man in Black origin episode was a major disappointment). The show told us all we needed to in order to understand the resolution to the core story, and though there were loose ends, they weren't of major importance. That said, I wasn't a huge fan of the flash sideways reveal. It felt like a huge waste of time that destroyed all of the urgency we felt about the events of the story. Because of that, I had a hard time feeling sad about Jack's death or excited about the beginning of Hurley's reign (also, I thought it was really weird that Sayid was with Shannon in the afterlife instead of Nadia, when he only dated the former for about a week within the timeline of the show, but that's not as important). That said, I can't say that I would have wanted the alternate timeline completely gone. Much as that would have made for a cleaner storyline, it also would have robbed us of some great character moments. I would have been sad if we never got to see the real Locke again, and episodes like "Dr. Linus" and "The Substitute" featured some great sideways content. And the payoffs at the end with Sawyer and Juliet and Sun and Jin were pretty great too. The fact is that if I were thoroughly disappointed with the Lost finale, I think I would have a clear vision for what I would have preferred, but I do not. There was some stuff in the finale that I was not satisfied with, but I see what the tradeoff would have been had it been left out. I am not fully satisfied with it, but I can't think of many finales with which I have been fully satisfied. Even if you did think it was bad, though, that shouldn't ruin the series for you. It had a great run that's made all the more impressive when you compare it to other dramas on network TV. Lost had ambition and attention to detail on a narrative and character level that you rarely see outside of cable. You shouldn't forget that just because the finale was not all you hoped it would be.

      May 23, 2011 at 6:53PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      jrwt54 I agree with you I watched LOST week after week hoping for some clever answers and then we got the John Locke show and that's when I tuned out.

      May 23, 2011 at 8:08PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      prettok Nadia wasn't with Sayid at the end - not because she wasn't Sayid's soul mate - because that church was exclusively for all those connected to each other by the island. Locke's girlfriend Helen was also absent for the same reason.

      I agree Shannon was a little too all over Sayid for my taste, but I chalked that up too all the characters being 'awoken' by the person who made the strongest impact on them. For Shannon, that person was Sayid.

      May 23, 2011 at 10:33PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Badger "attention to detail on a narrative...level..."

      I'm usually fine with people gushing over the LOST finale, but statements like these aggravate me. "Attention to detail" in its narrative was the biggest thing that LOST lacked! The show should be recognized for its atmosphere, musical score, camerawork, and audacious cliffhangers...but to say its narrative was marked by "attention to detail" is just a falsehood.

      May 24, 2011 at 2:58AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      tag8833 Jacob, I think you miscontrue the "What happened to Walt?" camp. They didn't require "all" the answers. Just the important ones. The ones that drove the plot for more than half a season need to be addressed. There was plenty of time to address them, but it was budgetted poorly.

      May 24, 2011 at 9:34AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      lizvelrene It bothers me not that they never answered the questions, but that they never even bothered to formulate answers to the questions they were raising in all the years of the show. It's just lazy fucking storytelling, and I ended up feeling like a dupe for actually believing they had a plan all along. Silly me!

      May 28, 2011 at 11:49PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    mikeman

    I'm still a bit frustrated about all the dead ends. There's no question Lost is one of my all-time favorite shows. I completely agree that it was miles beyond anything FlashForward, V, or the Event ever came up with (good riddance to all of them, and many more from previous years), which just goes to show how hard it is for a show like Lost to be so excellent. But I still feel that all the pointless leads and red herrings from each season will keep me from ever placing Lost ahead of the truly greatest TV dramas, like the Wire and Battlestar Galactica, although I still feel it's close. Maybe if I ever try rewatching down the line my impression will change.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:29PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Bale I love LOST, and I can understand why some people were left wanting by the ending, but I knew that was going to be the case, it became clear long before "The End" that there were 2 different types of people watching. People watching for the "answers" and then people who just wanted to go along for the ride with Jack and Kate and Lock and Sawyer and Desmond et al.

      I was firmly in that second category, and for me the finale was mostly perfect. (The on island resolution for me was everything I wanted and more.. the sideways universe was somewhat more problematic but I was forgiving of it because of the character beats it gave us)

      But I am pretty baffled that you claim to be let down by Lost's narrative dead ends yet you claim Battlestar Galactica is a "truly great TV Drama" right next to The Wire?

      BSG was way more egregious than LOST in writing checks it couldn't cash.

      May 24, 2011 at 1:50PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Bobobo I would also place BSG above LOST, despite the ending.

      BSG dealt with much bigger issues than LOST did, considering it was about the very survival of two races. Additionally, BSG's mythology is a lot less sprawling than LOST's and didn't have nearly as many unanswered questions.

      May 25, 2011 at 1:07AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Alan Smithee BSG wins on plot but I think Lost wins on characters. I found myself caring about a lot of Lost's characters but Apollo and especially Starbuck irritated me to no end. If it wasn't for the rest of the supporting cast, I probably wouldn't have finished it.

      May 28, 2011 at 11:54AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      mikeman I think BSG was widely credited as one of the finest TV dramas in history. I agree with you Alan that the characters on BSG were at times a little annoying and unsympathetic, but I thought the plot was so excellent, and the drama so well sustained throughout the entire series, that BSG deserves a better rating.

      May 30, 2011 at 2:15AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    P

    Is this where I make a claymation Abed reference?

    May 23, 2011 at 5:29PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      timb well said, p. So MUCH wasted potential

      May 25, 2011 at 2:11PM EST


  • Aw, man, I got goosebumps reading this and thinking about the finale and the characters we spent 6 years with. I was always more of a fan of the characters than the mysteries with LOST, so I thought the finale was perfect. I was completely satisfied.

    I really think there will never be another show like LOST, though, and they need to stop trying to re-create it. Just coming up with a show that has mysteries or jumps around in time does not an engrossing drama make. LOST was absolutely one of those creations where everything just magically worked (I'm not talking all plotlines and mysteries; I'm talking the chemistry of the cast, the unique storytelling devices, the intensity of the fandom, etc.), and it just can't be duplicated, *especially* when it's obvious shows (like those that Alan mentioned) are trying.

    I miss Terry O'Quinn on my screen most of all.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:32PM EST Reply to Comment
    • 100% agree with this

      May 23, 2011 at 6:52PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      tag8833 The problem with being a fan of the characters instead of the mystery was how unlikable the characters were. Jack holds the record for the ratio of (Time watched) / (Likability).
      John Locke was good, but the more they explained him, the more he lost likability.

      May 24, 2011 at 9:39AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      RobP The characters were unlikable? Huh. Funny. I liked ALL of them. Even, and especially, Jack. (Okay, not Shannon, but that's Maggie Grace's fault.) He made the choices no one else wanted to make, could make, like the good doctor he was. He was also human and struggled with his responsibility because he never got over his daddy issues. Sure, you can not like that fault in a person, and that would be the point, you want them to grow and move past it; eventually, Jack does. Season 6's Awesome Jack is due wholly to the development he went through in the previous seasons when he made oh, so many Jack-faces.

      Michael Keaton may have made a better Jack, had it happened, but Matthew Fox deserves accolades for creating such a complete character. Hell, they all do.

      May 25, 2011 at 6:13PM EST


  • loved the finale until the final 5 minutes. great show overall, still miss it. a good drama is def. lacking right now, luckily game of thrones is slowly becoming one of my must watch shows. and i'm VERY much anticipating the return of breaking bad.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:32PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      timb justified, Elijah, justified

      May 25, 2011 at 2:12PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Peter

    My feelings on "The End" haven't really changed -- I thought it was well done, and very moving throughout -- but I've given up all defense of the sixth season as a whole. I think ultimately it's the only season of the six that was a complete botch in conception (maybe the third as well). The flash-sideways, the temple, even the Jacob/Man-in-Black scenario that was only introduced in the S5 finale, all failed to ever really cohere with what had come before.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:33PM EST Reply to Comment


  • I might be a little more frustrated with the ending than you were, but it's still my second favorite network TV show of all time. (Sorry, but The West Wing will always win for me!)

    May 23, 2011 at 5:33PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    gregmc311

    I've always been one to think that they actually do explain most of the mysteries, but I do realize they didn't follow through with most of the buildup of the mysteries. I think people who were expecting grand revelations definitely have some worthy complaints because huge follow throughs on huge buildups of importance were not given. However, most mysteries were explained directly and even more were explained implicitly.

    I've already rewatched the series up to the sixth season and it is surprisingly comforting to find these hidden moments that show the creators knew more than we thought. There are several things that, looking back on, maybe they had an idea where they wanted to go with this show. For example, there is a lot of debate about Locke and whether he was supposed to be the Mib during the first part of the first season, and it isn't just fan conspiracy. There are real moments where it is not at all clear what the answer is. Of course, the theory breaks down the further you go into the episodes, but it looks like the writers were going to have Locke be a MIB type entity early on, but realized what kind of character they had in vanilla Locke.

    Overall, I think it was a very good show that holds up around 75-80 percent of the web it was spinning. It's not the Wire, and not even Harry Potter, with regards to planning, but there are certain items that can be picked up and figured out by a rewatch which I don't think a lot of people really assume about the show. For instance, while watching the first 3 seasons, you find out Locke knew about the source of the island way back in the first season and even saw it directly or through Smokey. I won't go through the exact "proof" but right after Locke confronts Smokey in first season, he reveals different pieces of information during conversations with Eko, Jack, and MIB as Eko.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:35PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      gregmc311 Oh yeah, and I miss the hell out of the show. I would give the finale a 9.7 out of 10, and the series a 8.8/10 overall.

      May 23, 2011 at 5:42PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Chrissy I'm not bothered by lack of resolution to what I think of as the smaller mysteries. But I do feel Iike the creators shot themselves in the foot just a bit by saying things early on about everything on the island having an explanation. I don't recall the exact quote and I'm sure fans exaggerated it. But I thought there was going to be a more elegant solution to all the interlocking puzzles than "magic" (although I recognized even then how unlikely that would be).

      For me, more than anything, the show is a landmark in the whole idea of what fandom has become in the era of the Internet. More than any other show, it felt like we were creating part of the universe of the show with theories and online discussion, and the Lost wiki still amazes me. I'll love and defend the show forever, and that sense of connection is a big part of why.

      May 23, 2011 at 7:26PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Andrew

    I'm a huge fan of the show and enjoyed it from start to finish, but I am still frustrated by the lack of resolutions regarding the mysteries of the island and it's inhabitants. Especially since those were what drew so many people and were the basis for many of the shows early plots. I almost feel like the writers couldn't figure out how to resolve these plot lines and decided to focus more on the drama aspect.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:35PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Danny

    To be honest, I loved the finale when it aired, but as time has passed I've felt more frustrated with it. It's still a show that I'll cherish, particularly seasons one and five, but there's a part of me that's angry.
    Why? Because while it was one hell of a ride, there were a lot of bumps along the road that I forgave based on the hope of an explanation. I don't particularly care about why Walt was special and I don't need scientific explanations for everything, but I was let down by never really receiving an adequate explanation for what the island was. At best, the explanation was vague (or to be fair, just too vague for me).
    We were encouraged to keep guessing and speculating about what the island was, and what it meant, but in the end I don't think I ever got a good enough answer. I think ultimately, it just sucks that I can't love the way the show ended the way I loved so much of its run.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:35PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      wiru That's the rub, though. What is the appropriate amount of explanation? Overexplain, or give an answer that's exhaustive, and you end up ruining what made the show compelling in the first place (i.e. the mystery). I'm much happier with a somewhat vague explanation than with something like "it was the ghost of Leland Palmer." The writers brought the narrative to a conclusion (after lots of wheel spinning) and gave viewers enough to piece together explanations for almost all of the show's mysteries. There are some inconsistencies and hanging threads, but I don't think there's ever been a 100-episode-plus TV drama that hasn't had similar issues.

      The other issue with resolutions is, of course, that it's a show about a time traveling island. No 'explanation' of that is going to amount to any more than 'magic,' whether it's a stream of technobabble or a glowing light.

      June 10, 2011 at 3:54PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Crumdawg97

    Gosh, I don't know. I still haven't gone back and watched the final episode because I was just so darn bummed with how it ended.

    I'm in the camp that wouldn't trade in the magic of those six seasons for anything (getting goosebumps thinking about the season 2 finale as we speak). But at the same time it's just incredibly maddening to think about how a show that did so many things perfectly managed to mess up the finish.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:36PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    ChampSkins

    Looking back, I didn't have that much of a problem with the finale, and to this day I have even less a problem. I think back about how much that show meant to me, and how much I looked forward to and enjoyed watching it, and there isn't a show I have ever enjoyed more. It may not have answered questions people wanted, but it was incredibly enjoyable TV.

    I feel sorry for those that want to say the entire series was ruined because they didn't like the finale. So you are saying you can't allow yourself to enjoy the hell out of a show that you enjoyed the hell out of because the ending didn't satisfy you?

    No matter what the Finale did for some, for me it focused on the most important thing about the show: the characters at the center of it all. Was I happy Jack got some closure, and Ben and Locke acknowledged the brilliance of eachother, or that best if all Juliet and Sawyer ended up together?! Absolutely! And that is what the show was all about for me, the characters they developed. Look at all the crap that is on TV today, and tell me any show does it better than Lost, because there aren't.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:37PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Crumdawg97 So many different reactions and sub-reactions to the finale...For me it wasn't a matter of "not liking" the finale or not finding it satisfying.

      It was that a HUGE REASON I enjoyed the show was all the fantastic plotlines and mysteries it set up throughout its run with an implied message that all of these things mattered. But too many things wound up not mattering...things I thoroughly enjoyed and wondered about week after week after week.

      A couple weeks after the finale I said to a friend that the real shame is that Darlton could've done all the things they wanted to do in the final season...and then any big fan could've easily plugged in the gaps with a few resolutions, and everybody would've gone home happy.

      It wasn't just that they didn't resolve so many things, it was that the absence of those resolutions was so glaring for a show that thrived on making its audience care.

      May 23, 2011 at 5:58PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ipj It's like a book. If the author muffs the ending with "...well, who knows why most of this stuff happened, I don't, but the setup was pretty cool, right?" then I can't go back and read the first part of the book and enjoy the set up, the interesting characters, etc. What ifs are much easier to spin than satisfying answers.

      By "satisfying" in the case of Lost I mean that there *are* answers. Wet Walt is appearing for a reason--he could be kidnapped Walt, future Walt, evil island, etc, but the writers know who he is and what outcome he is trying to achieve. The people in the second outrigger are Ilana's crew trying to change history because... But no. The final season of Lost made it clear that they never knew why weird stuff happened or connected it to a larger plot. And for me that renders the whole deeply unsatisfying as a story, however lovely the cinematography or excellent the actors.

      May 27, 2011 at 8:49AM EST


  • Miss Lost... but still bitter...
    I felt like it was all wrapped up a little too neatly for what it is... I didn't even need all of the questions answered but it would have been nice if they didn't have so much meaningless filler in Season 6 and to trick us with all these things in the Sideways world --- I mean if Desmond doesn't come along to help them all out.. they all live their lives over again minus crashing on the island - cept their dead?! So what about all the people in that world with them...since they all died at different times..they were all there together anyways... it's just a lot of HUH?! The sideways world was added more last minute I think and the only grand plan was jack closing his one eye... I mean Lost was a thinking person's show and that's why people were connecting things so when presented with things that were way off --- it does make ya mad since Darlton had tons of time and writers to figure it all out! Loved the show but they made it impossible to get to or leave the island... cept Faraday could with his plane.. I could go on and on --- and the outrigger doesn't even come close to what was left ...

    May 23, 2011 at 5:37PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Scott

    worse about that purgatory part of season six but better about the rest of the series. Saw Josh Holloway on Community and was immediately happy. A sign of a good show.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:38PM EST Reply to Comment


  • This take has always been the best one. The ending wasn't good as an ending in terms of bringing a story to a good narrative close. But it was a good ending in terms of making (some of) the people who watched it feel good about having stuck with the show through it all:
    Surpassing the self-indulgent self-reference of even the Seinfeld finale, but without the irony, the plot of the final season has been a literal recapitulation of the viewers’ own vicarious participation in the series all along, with the major characters’ entire narrative arcs transformed into tiny testaments to the greatness of the series itself. In this way the division between the audience and its protagonists is made to erode: these characters are on a quest to remember their adventures as we, their audience, have been watching them all along—and in the happy moments when their quest for revelation is achieved we get to glimpse again the show’s iconic sequences, naturally seeing them not from the characters’ visual perspective but from our own.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:39PM EST Reply to Comment
    • http://gerrycanavan.wordpress.com/2010/05/25/how-lost-teaches-us-to-grieve-it/ <--- there's the link. the stuff after the ":" is a quote. thanks hitfix

      May 23, 2011 at 5:40PM EST


  • As a strong supporter of the finale at the time, I find my opinion completely unchanged. Almost everything that was left unanswered didn't matter to the people we spent all those years with, and everyone who watched it solely for those answers, and not to see what happened to the characters, was never gonna be satisfied anyway. The sideways was a misstep to a degree, but at the same time it led to the finale's wonderful slew of moments of recognition.

    I just started re-watching from the beginning with my girlfriend, and I'm fairly confident she'll walk away satisfied, even while wondering about all the little (largely insignificant) details that the show didn't waste story time trying to explain. Just a great, great show on the whole, polar bear cages and Jack's tattoo's notwithstanding.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:41PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    GoSox

    Weirdly, without even realizing it was the first anniversary of the finale, I was thinking this morning how cool it would be if someone creative made a YouTube reimagining of the finale with a "more satisfying" conclusion, just to see what it looked like and what direction someone else might go. But then I realized that the problem was so much bigger than the finale -- the whole final season needed reworking.

    Although I was very into all of the characters, the mysteries were a big part of the joy I derived from the show, and I thought they were dealt with in a terribly clunky way throughout the last season, which created a lot of disappointment. The donkey wheel explanation, the scene where they put Desmond in the box and subjected him to the electromagnet, the sideways world being purgatory, the Temple... ugh. None of it worked for me. In many ways, they might've been better off explaining nothing, and doing a Sopranos-style "we'll show you where things are headed, then turn off the lights" ending, than doing what they did.

    So, after being a very devoted Lost fan for almost the entire run (I started watching halfway through the first season), I ultimately was, and am, left disappointed by the show. It turned out that Carlton and Damon didn't have the chops to put together a satisfying end to the series, and I paid the price.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:41PM EST Reply to Comment
    • This totally expressed my thoughts. I like to pretend that season 6 doesn't exist, but I really can't, so now the whole series is kinda dead to me. It's a shame Darlton did that and I'll never watch anything they have their hands in again.

      May 24, 2011 at 10:06AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Andrew

    I'm still frustrated with the flashes sideways in the final season and the number of red herrings throughout, but still love the journey overall. The series was very inconsistent. I can't imagine going back to revisit the story of Jack's tattoos again, but also love that what worked worked very well. "The thing is, we're going to have to take the boy" still gives me chills. Lost was not perfect and wasn't as consistent as The Wire or Breaking Bad, but it was also cinematic and ambitious in a way that network television had not been before and may never be again. I'm not sure that I'd argue that Lost was one of the few best series of the last decade, but still consider it one of my favorites.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:42PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Happycat_talkback_profile

    bhietanen

    The last season was an absolute mess. The Temple scenes were meaningless and almost seemed like stalling (just like Seasons 2/3). The final resolution didn't bother me as much until i realized that some of the flashsideways brought nothing to the table. Still the finale was great. The scene with Sawyer and Juliet at the vending machine was one of those scenes that made the bumpy road worth it. While it will never be in the same class as The Wire (or Breaking Bad or Mad Men) it was a great journey and we'll look back at a year ago and probably mark it as the death of network dramas.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:42PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      gregmc311 It's weird to see everyone hate the last season, but I feel that has to do with the sideways (which I loved and thought it tied the season together completely; made complete sense, but I won't get into it because I can get wordy with this show.

      I do agree with the Temple being wasteful, and a certain feeling of running in motion with the moving of all the players around the island throughout the season.

      May 23, 2011 at 6:05PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ThomasBrady Sideways didn't have much of a point to me.

      They did things like bringing the Charlotte character back just so can screw Sawyer in a place that doesn't even exist in the first place. Genius.

      May 23, 2011 at 7:02PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Col Bat Guano The sideways universe seems like it was mostly invented to them a reason to reunite characters they had killed off in earlier seasons, but that fans still wanted to see. It made no narrative sense and if you think about it too hard it falls apart like wet tissue.

      May 24, 2011 at 1:25AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Tausif Khan

    Where will we be seeing Lost cast members in shows this fall?

    May 23, 2011 at 5:43PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    jenfullmoon

    I don't really care any more. I didn't like the finale so much, don't want to ever rewatch it. Whatever. But I wasn't in love with the show.

    So, what WAS "the event?" Did they ever say?

    May 23, 2011 at 5:44PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    loretta

    You know, I was thinking about Lost just a couple days ago... I'd just finished watching the FNL series finale on DVD (don't worry, I won't spoil it here), and reflecting on the fact that, although I'd argue that there are many better series, as a whole, very few have made me *feel* more than either of FNL or Lost...

    Even with both of their (sometimes all-too-frequent) missteps, that's something pretty special, and pretty rare.

    (Of course, this should be read with the caveat that The Wire managed to have both the "written with consistent greatness" thing and the "punch you in the gut" emotional thing, which is why it transcends any other series we've seen to-date.)

    Of course, I'll acknowledge differences for taste, but I'd be surprised if someone said they felt like they'd been taken on similar emotional rollercoasters by, say, Mad Men (which, yes, I do love and yes, I would also say is clearly the better show, but it seems to want the audience to have a different relationship with the characters than the Lost or FNL "if they cry, I cry" thing).

    May 23, 2011 at 5:45PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      jk Yes, Lost had heart, like FLN and Terriers (RIP). It pulled me through a divorce and two years of unemployment. I was WAY over-invested in the show (and I know I'm not the only one who was), so the finale was devastating for me (and would have been no matter how it ended.) I am so grateful it's over and it seems like way more than a year. In the years when I was furiously writing fan theories and emailing them to all my friends, I couldn't see how lost I was. My friends were very patient with me. Now I am pretty sheepish when I think about all the hours I poured into my analysis of the show. I hope I am never that "into" a show again, or rather, I hope I never need to be that "into" a show again. A year later, the finale and the show seems unworthy of my devotion, and it undoubtedly was, but that's my own fault. No finale could have satisfied me.

      May 23, 2011 at 8:16PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Dave

    How many of the people who weren't satisfied with the show also the kind of people who aren't interested nor participating in interpersonal relationships. Of course they wouldn't get it.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:46PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      tag8833 Yes, everyone who didn't like Lost is an unlovable loner nerd who's never got laid.

      May 24, 2011 at 9:48AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Greg

    What I didn't like about the finale wasn't the lack of answers, but the purgatory reveal and what that meant for the rest of the season. I didn't really like the flash-sideways even when I thought they were going somewhere, I now I feel that Season 6 will be pretty much unwatchable.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:46PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Your statement is pretty close to my position. I stilll think the whole alternate timeline was a huge mistake. Half of the final season was a glorified dream sequence? And it ends with an afterlife reunion party? Not cool, or even original. Homicide: Life on the Street did the latter. This big reveal was such a downer for fans used to the large doses of original story telling that the show had provided. So, instead of an 18 episode final season, it would have been much more satisfiying to have a 9 episode final season without the alternate timeline.
      As far as the answers go, I was happy with what we got. What we weren't told, we were given enough info to figure out.

      May 23, 2011 at 7:10PM EST
    • Spot on. Loved the series as a whole, disliked the sixth season because of meandering afterlife schmaltz that was ultimately irrelevant to the story we'd been following. It felt like fan-fiction. Emotionally it was satisfying but from a narrative standpoint the sideways universe was just filler.

      I like that someone re-edited the sixth season to remove the extraneous bits: http://lostrevised.tumblr.com/

      May 23, 2011 at 9:16PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Erin I totally agree. One of the many things that was great about Lost was how well everything tied together; rewatching episodes could provide more insight. The major problem with the finale for me was that flash sideways afterlife has no bearing on the rest of the story what-so-ever. I felt majorly cheated that the storylines did not connect within their lifetimes. Who cares what happened after everyone was dead?

      May 24, 2011 at 10:50PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Steve

    The more I reflect back on the series, the more I hate the Finale. I accept the plotless points in Seasons 2-3, but I thought they had more of a plan after that point. The Stuff at the temple was just stalling and a waste of an actor like John Hawkes.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:48PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      ipj "I thought they had a plan" sums up why I stuck with the show and why I found the finale undercut any pleasure I once got from the story. I thought the Game of Gods was a great reveal. S6 would fill in the game, its rules, and we would look back at S1-5 and understand the weird happenings as moves within those rules. Humans as playthings of immortals who easily discard and replace them, pawns trying to become kings and then trying to escape the playing board altogether, those are incredible, epic motivations to explore.

      But no. It was just another weird little "hey, you know what would be weird?" thing. I remember when I thought the Sideways was the What if the Island Were Gone world, in which the slightly happier outcomes suggested how dark the island and its drama queen ways were. But then that all trickled off...

      May 27, 2011 at 8:59AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Mr Belvedere Thank you Steve and IPJ! You just nailed down my thoughts and feelings as well. I too can accept some of the plotless points but I thought they had more of a plan heading into the final three. And for everyone who has posted agreeing that they can be satisfied with the character payoffs, I just need to say that I was as well.

      However, I think it should be asked: to have the terrific characters, did we really need to have the island get more and more out of control with the mysteries with each passing season??

      Take the Others for example. We went from "we're not alone on this island" to "there's natives who want to do us harm and steal our children" to "they're actually scientists and regular people who like book clubs and gardens but are also ruthless, malicious, kidnappers and somewhat cold-blooded killers" to "they're actually an ancient cult who follow a supernatural island entity that tells them to kidnap children and take people hostage to protect the island at all costs" to "they deserve our sympathy because there's actually WORSE people that have arrived to destroy them" to "being almost completely nonexistent for a season" to "being completely wiped out by the Smoke Monster".

      In the end it could be argued that for Lost to have been a great character driven show did The Others even need to have been involved? If they were not going to really be paid off in any way other then "sure we were bad, but the Smoke Monster is worse and look at how bad he is - he destroyed us all and you'll never know anything more about us", then why have them in the first place never mind have them around for several seasons? And they were THE plot device that was SUCH a huge part of the show for the first 3 seasons (starting with Ethan stealing Claire and hanging Charlie midway through the first) that you couldn't wait to find out how this group of people could have become so full of malice and contempt for human life. In the end the answer ended up not only being unsatisfying, it turns out it was completely unnecessary to have had them involved in the first place. If it was simply about the characters being paid off then you didn't need all the mysteries that just got more and more fantastic as the series rolled along... and THAT is frustrating for folks that invested their time and energy into talking about those same mysteries with friends and family week after week, season after season. I hope that those fans that are quick to point out that Lost "was never about the plot as much as about the characters" can understand that an entire "Lostpedia" wasn't created because fans needed to organize their thoughts and feelings on the characters... there was much more to the show then just great characters. No show offered what Lost was offering plot-wise over these years, and I think there are fans that deserve to be disappointed by the plot resolutions the show gave them.

      I agree with whomever it was who wrote above that they shouldn't have let things spiral out of control in the first place. K.I.S.S. (Keep it simple stupid).

      February 14, 2012 at 2:28AM EST
  • Alexd_talkback_profile

    alexd

    The more I've thought about it over the year, the more I feel like the entire last season was forcefully tacked on. I think the series buttons up nicely with the island sinking in the past and everyone landing in LA, without an accident ever happening... That should have been the end.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:49PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Mr Belvedere I agree AlexD. Once they had established "time traveling island", I know that anything can become possible and I enjoyed the way they used being stuck in the past to their advantage.

      What I don't understand is why they had to show the island sunk to the bottom of the sea right off the bat in the sideways universe? The resolution of that world in retrospect makes watching that reveal seem like pure lying to the audience. Why do we need to be shown that the island is sunk to the bottom with a Dharma shark swimming by if this world is... purgatory??? If someone can offer an explanation for that other then "we need to throw you so completely off the scent of what this world is, that we'll show you this in order to manipulate you from the jump of this season" then I'd love to know. Lost was better then this and this is another good reason for how I personally felt disappointed about the ending.

      February 14, 2012 at 9:35AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    tigh66

    I recently had to list my personal top 10 TV shows of all-time, and I added a quick disclaimer in my Number 1 pick that Lost wasn't the best series of all time ( that was the Wire, coming in at two), but it would always be my favorite.

    I met my best friend in the world through Lost, I made numerous friendships discussing Lost, and I became attached to these characters.

    Benjamin Linus remains in my mind the greatest character in television history, perfectly played with utter complexity by Michael Emerson. And that isn't even touching Terry O'Quinn as John Locke, Henry Ian Cusick as Desmond David Hume, Nestor Carbonell as Richard Alpert, or Josh Holloway as James Ford. This is arguably the greatest ensemble of all-time.

    The story holds up remarkably well for five seasons, and concessions can be made for a somewhat messy Season Six. Really, by the end, the only answer I really wanted to know was who shot at the Losties when they were jumping through time? But I am content.

    But Lost's greatest accomplishment was its "Wow" moments. All quality shows have "Wow" moments, weather from a huge plot twist or an emotional character moment. But Lost had them week in and week out. I'll never forget Kate walking towards Jack at the airport, or Desmond's call to Penny, or Ben's face when Keamy shoots Alex, or when John Locke showed up in a coffin at the end of not just Season Four but also Five, but arguably the most moving moment of the entire series comes at the end. It was a beautiful end to these characters I had come to care for. I have not watched an episode since the series finale a year ago today.

    I believe I'll start again.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:51PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Suzombie I agree with your very well put post, especially the WOW moments. For me, LOST comes up in conversations, a quick quote or character reference, and we can laugh or smile. We see the actors in other roles, but there will only be one. I still miss it.

      And I miss this blog. I have yet to latch on to a new show that I must watch and review. FNL is finished too.

      May 23, 2011 at 6:04PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Victorycurtis I concur. I recently began re-watching Lost from the beginning (Netflix) and have found myself just as engrossed as the first time I watched it years ago. The crash of the airliner remains one of the most terrifying, exciting things that I have ever witnessed on television. Knowing how it all ends is having absolutly no bearing on how excited I am re-watching the series. Whenever I put an episode on it feels like I am revisiting old friends. Game of Thrones is the only series on now that even comes close to the level of excitement that I used to feel for Lost. And for the record, But, The Wire, in my opinion, was the greatest series of all time.

      May 23, 2011 at 9:12PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    shagamu

    I got everything I wanted out of the finale. I mean, how many shows go to the extent of showing what happened to the characters AFTER they died? As far as closure goes, you can't top that.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:53PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Scott J. That's what I love most about LOST. We saw how these characters evolved from childhood to adulthood, how they came together, how they died, and how they ultimately found meaning in their lives. What other show gives you the spiritual journey of one character from beginning to end, let alone a whole cast of characters?

      May 24, 2011 at 7:34PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    ed w

    What I find very strange is how almost all the critics (these are critics I generally respect) focus on the season ending finale episode as if that made or broke season 6 rather than sizing up season 6 as a whole which if you subtract the finale was objectively poorly written and plotted and just exceedingly lifeless and lame. Pulling a rabbit out of the hat at the last minute shouldn't make up for that much.

    And I am not only not hoping for another show to fill the Lost spot but when Fringe suddenly became very Lost like towards the end of this last season I saw my interest plummeting.

    May 23, 2011 at 5:55PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      ThomasBrady The first paragraph is on the money. Good point.

      May 23, 2011 at 7:18PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      tag8833 I think that is generally true of most seasons of Lost. Many of the flaws of the series weren't as evident in the finales. Many critics overlooked the missteps throughout the season to celebrate the successes of the finale.

      May 24, 2011 at 9:54AM EST
Next 193 Comments
Alan Sepinwall

About This Blog

All through his childhood, Alan Sepinwall's relatives told his parents, "All that boy does is watch television! How's he going to make a living doing that?" His career as a TV critic has been 15 years and counting of his attempt to answer their concerns. "What's Alan Watching" is a blog whose title is self-explanatory: Alan watches TV shows, then writes about what he watched. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

HitFix Poll

Will you still watch Community without Dan Harmon behind it?

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook