Review: Showtime's 'United States of Tara' & 'Nurse Jackie' take different paths in season 3
'Tara' wants to change and 'Jackie' doesn't
Toni Collette in "United States of Tara."
The entertainment media (of which I am an unapologetic member) loves its trend stories, and one of the popular trend pieces a few years back was about how Showtime had passed HBO as the standard-bearer for quality programming on pay cable. HBO was in its fallow post-"Sopranos" period, while Showtime kept rolling out one attention-getting new series after another, from "Weeds" and "Dexter" through to "Nurse Jackie" and "United States of Tara," which both begin their third seasons tonight at, respectively, 10 and 10:30.
Somewhere along the way, though, HBO mounted a furious comeback, thanks to the popular success of "True Blood" and critical acclaim for the likes of "Boardwalk Empire" and "Treme." And at the same time, the formula with which most of the Showtime series had been created - some combination of noted character actors plus high-concept premises, often placed in a half-hour format that somehow classified laugh-light series as comedies - has become to seem as conventional and tired as the stuff the broadcast networks churn out season after season. Most Showtime series burn hot, burn bright, then hang around for a very long time, flickering on and off, because it's bad business sense to let them simply burn out. (Case in point: "Dexter," which will never change a darned thing about its formula so long as it's the channel's biggest hit.)
That's not always the case, though, as demonstrated by the contrast between tonight's two returning shows. "Nurse Jackie" exemplifies the stuck-in-neutral, idea-over-execution problems that ultimately plague most Showtime series, while "United States of Tara" has found a way to transcend arguably the channel's most gimmicky premise.
I don't have much new to say about the third season of "Jackie," because the show's strengths and weaknesses are the same as they've always been. Edie Falco is delivering a finely-tuned lead performance as the painkiller-addicted title character, and supporting players Merritt Wever and Peter Facinelli are funny enough that the series actually feels like a comedy from time to time. But other than improving the characterization of Anna Deavere Smith's hospital administrator between seasons one and two, it's a show that has stubbornly refused to - or been unable to - evolve. Jackie is still Jackie, still getting away with the same antics she always did. The first season ended on a cliffhanger where it appeared Jackie was on the verge of being found out, only for season two to largely ignore it. Season two ended with Jackie's husband and best friend confronting her even more blatantly about her drug problem, and... well, let's just say this is a show that doesn't believe much in the idea of consequences.
"Tara," on the other hand, has been very open to the notion of consequences, and evolution. Its conception seemed to represent the Showtime formula to a T: recognizable star (Toni Collette), unconventional premise (Kansas housewife with multiple personalities), shiny creative pedigree (Steven Spielberg came up with the idea, and Oscar-winning "Juno" writer Diablo Cody created the series and its characters), etc.
It would have been very easy for the show to rest on its obvious hook, simply giving Emmy winner Collette a new alter ego to play each year and telling the same kinds of stories - with the same kind of Cody-style quips - over and over again. But while the writers have, in fact, revealed a new personality or two for Tara with each season, the series as a whole has gotten deeper, darker and just plain better as it's gone along.
In some ways, it's not even trying to be a comedy anymore, but that's largely to its benefit. The new season - run by longtime "Tara" writers Brett Baer and Dave Finkel - takes Tara's condition and its origins very seriously. The episodes delve into questions the show either hasn't asked before or has only touched on briefly. Tara's husband Max (John Corbett), sister Charmaine (Rosemarie DeWitt) and kids Kate (Brie Larson) and Marshall (Keir Gilchrist) are all allowed to acknowledge the tremendous emotional burden of loving a woman who at any given moment could become one of a half-dozen other people, and it leads to some tremendous moments for the entire supporting cast. (Corbett's carved out a nice career based on good looks and tremendous affability, but he's really challenged this season and he rises to it.)
At the same time, Tara - with some help from her new psychology professor, played with usual roguish charm by Eddie Izzard - struggles to maintain prominence in and control of a body that's overcrowded with so many colorful characters like '50s housewife Alice and macho Vietnam vet Buck.
"I'm just sick of disappearing," Tara laments, "and being the least interesting person inside me."
The new season starts a bit slow - and gets particularly uncomfortable during a poorly-timed storyline in which Kate's planned trip to Japan is ruined by an earthquake. (As she pouts, Max wryly notes, "200 people died. This may not be about Kate.") But it's all laying the groundwork for a gripping, almost nightmarish second half of the season in which the life of every member of the Gregson family seems in danger of splintering as badly as Tara's psyche.
It's not what the series was at the beginning, but that's what makes it so good. There's plenty of room on television for shows that are going to be the same from week to week and season to season. CBS makes a lot of money on those, and now CBS-affiliated Showtime does as well. But the best shows on television are usually the ones that challenge our expectations of the kinds of stories they'll tell and the sorts of places to which they'll take their characters.
In many ways, these two series are very much like their heroines. Jackie is a stubborn woman who sees no need to alter the course of her very problematic life, and the show around her is just as afraid of change. Tara is someone who's constantly examining and challenging herself, trying to figure out what makes her tick and how to be better, and the show is going on the journey of self-discovery with her.
Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
News From Our Partners
-
This Was Pop: May 26, 2012
For Our Consideration: Reconsidering Codeine, a ’90s band frozen in time
Podmass: May 17-May 23
-
-
FIRST LOOK: It's 'The X Factor' Judges, Y'all!
Helene Campbell on Ellen: Double-Lung Recipient Gets Her 'Dance Dare'
'Bachelor' Host Dishes On His Favorite Romances
-
OMG Girlz Release 'Where the Boys At?'
The Dandy Warhols Celebrate 18 Years Together
Lady Gaga Turns Yellow For The Simpsons
-
Brandi Glanville Claims She Hooked Up With Gerard Butler
Charlie Sheen Talks Ladies – Onscreen & Off
Jonah Hill ‘Overwhelmed’ By ‘Moneyball’ Supporting Actor Nomination
-
Robert Pattinson's 'Cosmopolis': The Cannes Reviews Are In!
Marvel Casting Round-Up: 'Thor 2,' 'Iron Man 3' Add Villains
'Men In Black' Star Will Smith's Energy Needs To Be 'Harnessed'
-
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - TWoP 10: In Memoriam - What We'll Miss from Cancelled Shows
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Thursday, May 24, 2012
-
Critics Consensus: Men in Black III Is Solid Fun
Five Favorite Films with Director-Producer Oren Peli
Cannes 2012: Critics Scorecard
About This Blog
All through his childhood, Alan Sepinwall's relatives told his parents, "All that boy does is watch television! How's he going to make a living doing that?" His career as a TV critic has been 15 years and counting of his attempt to answer their concerns. "What's Alan Watching" is a blog whose title is self-explanatory: Alan watches TV shows, then writes about what he watched. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching
HitFix Poll
Will you still watch Community without Dan Harmon behind it?
Latest Posts
-
What would he have done differently? And what did the finale mean?Thursday, May 24, 2012
-
Our summer rewind will take us into season 2 of 'Deadwood'Thursday, May 24, 2012
-
Danny Masterson and friends don't do much of interest in Breckin Meyer-created sitcomWednesday, May 23, 2012
-
Celebrate the finale's anniversary with Jack, Sawyer, Hurley and friendsWednesday, May 23, 2012

Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
March 28, 2011 at 9:09AM EST Reply to CommentThose were my thoughts at the end of the last season of each, though mine were not as eloquent. Brilliantly articulated, thank you.
cp
March 28, 2011 at 10:47AM EST Reply to Commentone could look at the Nurse Jackie "all is well, why change anything?" outlook to be similar to that of the title character (a moderate opiate addict) - content with the current situation (as a result of the drugs), and highly resistant to change.
M
March 28, 2011 at 10:56AM EST Reply to CommentI saw screeners of the first two Nurse Jackie episodes and I think you're being kind. Not only does nothing change, but Kevin and O'Hara's reactions are so understated as to have almost no basis in reality. (I won't say more for fear of spoiling things.)
I am curious if you were bothered by the music during Nurse Jackie. I know you've complained about the music ABC uses on its dramas during comedic moments and in one of the episodes Zoe is talking about her sex life and the music that plays is incredibly distracting.
JayHayabusa
March 28, 2011 at 11:36AM EST Reply to CommentSo Alan, have you seen the full third season of each show? Don't you prefer (Like Lights Out) to watch the episodes as they air? Or are you taking a different approach with these shows?
sepinwall I watched all 12 Taras, for reasons I'll expand on in tonight's post. I stopped with Jackie after the 4th or 5th episode, because it was clear the show still was what it was, and I didn't need to keep going in order to inform my review here.
March 28, 2011 at 11:38AM ESTechos myron
March 28, 2011 at 2:50PM EST Reply to CommentShowtime has NEVER produced a series that started well and also finished well. I refuse to regard them as a premium network. Their boxing coverage, despite its low production values, towers over any series that they air.
LJA
March 28, 2011 at 3:15PM EST Reply to CommentSo, wait, is Diablo Cody not actively working on Tara any longer?
sepinwall Cody wrote the premiere, but she was on maternity leave for most of the season. I don't know if she'll be back for a hypothetical fourth season or not, but keep in mind she was never technically the showrunner. Alexa Junge ran season one and Jill Soloway season two.
March 28, 2011 at 3:34PM ESTLJA I had actually forgotten/didn't know that. I thought Cody was showrunner seasons 1-2. Thanks for the info. This also explains why I so much preferred S2 to S1.
March 28, 2011 at 3:54PM EST
March 28, 2011 at 4:53PM EST Reply to CommentEddie Izzard! I honestly cannot tell you why I kept watching Nurse Jackie after season 2 episode 1. At least I was finally able to pull myself away from Weeds. Wife and son are still watching.
Boricua in Texas
March 28, 2011 at 5:00PM EST Reply to CommentI have enjoyed reading your critique of both shows in the past, and always found myself agreeing with you. I think US of Tara is the better of the two, and always lament Nurse Jackie's wasted potential.
Nacho
March 28, 2011 at 5:04PM EST Reply to CommentThanks for this piece Alan. It totally justifies my decision to stop watching Nurse Jackie, while getting me excited about USoT. Sometimes I wonder if shows I stopped watching ever got better, but it looks like I'm not missing much from Nurse Jackie. Thanks again.
Austin Graff
March 28, 2011 at 6:02PM EST Reply to CommentUnited States of Tara always takes unexpected turns, making it such a riveting show to watch. The cast is superb: Toni Collette, John Corbett, Keir Gilchrist, Rosemarie Dewitt, Brie Larson, Michael Hitchcock, and Patton Oswald are all excellent. They feel like old friends caught in the whirlwind of Tara's life, and although very few of us can relate to knowing someone with D.I.D., I think we all have had people in our lives whose unpredictable circumstances cause us to change and think about ourselves, for better or worse. Long live Tara!
A.P.
March 29, 2011 at 3:48AM EST Reply to Comment"Jackie is a stubborn woman who sees no need to alter the course of her very problematic life, and the show around her is just as afraid of change. Tara is someone who's constantly examining and challenging herself, trying to figure out what makes her tick and how to be better, and the show is going on the journey of self-discovery with her."
Brilliant summation. Fantastic write-up Alan.
I'm now looking forward to what twists and turns USoT will bring this season.
mickeyitaliano
March 29, 2011 at 11:57PM EST Reply to CommentWrite a comment...
mickeyitaliano
March 30, 2011 at 12:07AM EST Reply to CommentI believe the fact that Jackie is really not a nice person has everyone in an uproar. She is is ER nurse in NYC working long hours and she is not happy with herself. Hence ...every addict. I think you are taking this show on a pollyanna type of theme. It's not. She's hard and damaged and although loving she still fronts her addiction front and center.
Tara has those forgiving eyes which I would certainly fall to (as does her husband and kids).
The scene two nights ago with all 4 Tara's was great.
Both Collette and Falco carry these shows like Linney on hers.A testememnt to Showtime for giving fantastic actresses something to act in aside from a hooker or sad mom playing second fiddle to a least talented actor.
cletus van damme
March 30, 2011 at 7:28PM EST Reply to CommentAlan, you wil never understand the concept of a dramedy..will you? It doesn't have to be haha funny just because it's a half hour and it doesn't have to be realistic just because it isn't a conventional comedy.
There is also nothing wrong to repeat some elements from season to season. Pretty common for a series I heard. Justified or Good Wife for example aren't reinventing the wheel either. Even The Sopranos didn't change it's formula and main character dynamic before the last season.
But congratulations ...your thesis that the showtime series are as tired and conventional as the network stuff is actually the funniest thing I read all year. What's next? Two and a Half Men is better written than Californication or HBO's Hung? CSI more funny and intense than Dexter?
April 1, 2011 at 9:27PM EST Reply to CommentWow, you pontificated my thoughts
tanya nash
May 2, 2011 at 7:09AM EST Reply to CommentWe have only just seen season 2 finale in the UK. So I've saved reading your excellent reviews until now. Thanks for giving me reason why I was so disappointed with the start of S2. The show had ignored the s1 cliff. That makes so much sense.
I came to enjoy s2 about half way through but never quite got the buzz I enjoyed from s1. I'm interested in s3 but less so after reading your predictions. As I doubt it will be shown here, I'll see if I feel like buying the dvds at some point.
My contribution is - do the writers think on some level they are writing a sitcom? Is that why they are afraid to follow the natural dramatic story arcs? I don't think its sitcom in performance style, of course, but as you've noted, in both seasons the situation never changes and there are no real consequences yet for Jackie.