"Nurse Jackie" (Edie Falco) is on the defensive to start season 4.
Credit: Showtime
For the two-plus seasons I watched
"Nurse Jackie," it was a show with a tremendous lead performance by
Edie Falco, a bunch of well-etched supporting characters played by
Merritt Wever,
Anna Deavere Smith and
Peter Facinelli (among others) and a reliably black comic sensibility that could deftly turn on a dime for more serious moment. But it was also a show that, like Jackie — a painkiller addict concealing her addiction, an extramarital affair and any number of other secrets — stubbornly, proudly in denial of the need to change things up even a little. Consequences seemed to hurtle at Jackie with regularity, but they were always quickly dodged.
After a while, that refusal to shake things up and force Jackie to deal with the wreck her life had become forced me to quit the show cold turkey. After I left, things got even worse on the no-consequences front, as last season's finale (which I later watched on a "Even you won't believe they did this" recommendation from a friend) went out of its way to tease anyone who thought comeuppance was coming. On the personal front, right when Jackie was on the verge of confessing her adultery to husband Kevin (
Dominic Fumusa),
he admitted an affair to her, allowing her to hypocritically reclaim the moral high ground, while at work, Ms. Akalitus (Smith) threw Jackie's drug test in the trash to protect her.
But sometime between that finale and the fourth season premiere (Sunday at 9 p.m.), "Jackie" co-creators Liz Brixius and Linda Wallem appear to have had a moment of clarity and realized that if their show kept running in place, it would suffer a slow, mediocre death. "Nurse Jackie" season 4 is all consequences, all the time — and is much, much more satisfying overall as a result.
How swift is the turnaround? The new season opens with Jackie checking into rehab, and within the first 30 seconds, we hear her drug counselor warn her, "Let's make this really clear: you're accountable now."
We quickly flash back to see how Jackie wound up in this place, physically and emotionally, about which I'll say little. But Brixius and Wallem are smart to recognize not only the need to shake things up, but the storytelling possibilities from all of Jackie's many secrets and the different people who could learn them. Not everyone knows everything (or, in the case of Facinelli's amusingly oblivious Dr. Coop, anything), but Jackie's various colleagues and loved ones start getting a look at different puzzle pieces, which puts the intensely private Jackie on the defensive and changes the nature of many of her relationships. If you feel like you've seen every possible interaction between, for instance, Jackie and temperamental opposite Zoey (Wever, hilarious as always), you haven't.
And it's not like the show does a 180 with Jackie. She may be trying to change, but her circumstances have changed far more than she has. She still has all of her flaws; she's just more conscious of them than before, and now has to operate in a world where others — including people who hold power over her future — are more aware of them, too. That feels real, and gives the writers and Falco a lot to work with.
And correcting the series' major flaw makes the quality of the rest of it even easier to see. Whatever issues I had with Jackie skating out of trouble, Falco has always been superb. If anything, Jackie's new status quo gives her more of an opportunity to play comedy, which she's done so well in the past on both this show and "The Sopranos." When Falco won a comedy actress Emmy for this role in 2010, she said, self-effacingly, "This is the most ridiculous thing that has ever, ever happened in the history of this lovely awards show. I'm not funny!" If she wins another one down the line, people who watch this show won't buy that from her.
And the series has become a very sturdy workplace comedy around Falco, one that also gets a shakeup with the arrival of Bobby Cannavale as Michael Cruz, a doctor representing the conglomerate that's purchased All Saints Hospital and intends to maximize its profits. Cruz allows the show to delve more deeply into our dysfunctional healthcare system, but he's not a cartoon villain, and the presence of an authority figure who has no allegiance to Jackie at this very vulnerable time in her life only ups the stakes.
Generally, when a show gets to the age "Nurse Jackie" is at, it's decided what it wants to be and sticks to that for as long as it can, for good or for ill. Every now and then, though, an older show can learn new tricks, and I was glad to see this one do it.
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signuppecola
April 6, 2012 at 10:41AM EST Reply to CommentI actually had the same issue with "Nurse Jackie" and, like you, I dropped the show, cold turkey, at the start of Season 3. I'm intrigued by the impact that accountability might have on the show--enough to give it another shot...
madaboutmen
April 6, 2012 at 1:05PM EST Reply to CommentI stuck with the show because of the acting but I, too, was very mad at the end of the season when she gets off the hook AGAIN. But I watched the new episode on demand and was very satisfied with what took place and look forward to more of the show.
somethingcool
April 6, 2012 at 1:17PM EST Reply to CommentAlan, I really liked the first season but dropped out quickly into the second after getting irritated by the "No consequences" thing. Do you think I could jump right into this episode without catching up?
txt
April 6, 2012 at 1:19PM EST Reply to CommentSo, is it a recommendation, should I return? I must say, I hated the show's last season, I have never felt so burned by a harmless show that I didn't even invest that much in.
For the past 3 seasons, she has face no consequence and the people around her has done nothing even though everyone knew she was an addict. And then last season finale came, I almost hit my TV for such a godawful non-resolution. instead of Jackie being punished for her wicked way, her hapless husband, who did everything for her but she and her doctor friend constantly whine and ridicule about, was kicked out no question asked. I swore never to return this show full of shockingly awful characters. If you watch the pilot, and the 3rd season, basically NOTHING has changed. A lot of fans said, but the quirky supporting cast is worth watching. Um, no, that's not enough.
I'm glad Showtime's new president insist on the show making changes, but it's too little too late, plus, he also defended Dexter's godawful season too. None of Showtime's show ever take much risk, every season seemed the same. I just hope Homeland would break the trend.
nath
April 6, 2012 at 3:12PM EST Reply to CommentI'm glad the show seems to be getting better again, but I'm disappointed that it ruined my snarky one-liner. "A Showtime show artificially spinning its wheels to maintain the status quo to keep a hit on the air rather than telling an authentic story? Well, I never..."
Greg
April 6, 2012 at 6:37PM EST Reply to CommentI'm really glad to read that. That third season was so repetitive and formulaic that I couldn't even distinguish each episode aside from tiny random useless details (a rat falling from an air duct, Gracie rehearsing for a school play, etc.). I guess I never really liked the show aside from the cast and characters.
Matt
April 9, 2012 at 2:20AM EST Reply to CommentWas that Billy Joe Armstrong from Green Day? It had to be....
Amos yes! Without the eyeliner.
April 9, 2012 at 5:07AM ESTCJ
April 10, 2012 at 1:40PM EST Reply to CommentSepinwall, you have really become so arrogant in your reviews. Shows that some of us enjoy are somehow unworthy of our viewership because the Great Sepinwall has "quit cold turkey". And when the Great Sepinwall no longer watches a show, none of us can discuss it any longer. And unbelievably, more than once, you have reviewed your own reviews. The sad part is that you use to be just a normal, humble guy. But you are so full of hubris now that you don't even realize is that you are truly writing for an audience of one. The masses are just fortunate enough to be able to watch you write for yourself. You have become your own most important audience. Well Sepinwall, after years of reading your work, I am going to leave you to it. I have had enough of watching your conversation with yourself. I prefer to remember you when you were part of our community not the Great Sepinwall you now deem yourself to be.
sepinwall Sorry you won't be around to see this reply, but my writing's always been a reflection on my tastes. I'm not going to write about a show I don't like anymore, but I don't begrudge others for enjoying it more than I do; I just don't have the capability to provide a forum to talk about shows I'm not watching.
April 10, 2012 at 1:49PM ESTAUSpur
April 10, 2012 at 3:54PM EST Reply to CommentIf only "Dexter" would follow suit.