Review: 'Mad Men' - 'Far Away Places': The HoJo code
Peggy, Roger and Don take three very different trips
The passage of time was a major issue for Don and everyone else on this episode of "Mad Men."
Are you a fan of Mad Men?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
A review of tonight's "Mad Men" coming up just as soon as I buy you a backscratcher...
"Every time we fight, it just diminishes this." -Megan
Only one of the three stories in "Far Away Places" features characters who have taken LSD, and yet the entire episode feels structured like an acid trip. It keeps cycling back and forth through the events of the same day to show it from the perspectives of Peggy, Roger and Don, but that's a pretty familiar narrative trick in our post-"Pulp Fiction" world. What makes the episode feel so trippy is the way that time feels so fluid even within the context of each story.
Obviously, Roger loses all track of time while under the influence of the acid, but the time edits in the Peggy and Don stories feel nearly as elliptical. Time is clearly passing as Peggy goes through a lousy day at work, or as Don panics in the aftermath of a fight with Megan, but that time feels like it's collapsing and expanding at random. Peggy lies down on Don's couch in the day and is immediately greeted by darkness; Don's search through the Howard Johnson's for Megan simultaneously feels like it's going on forever and for two minutes. (When the cop asks Don exactly how long Megan's been missing, it takes him a moment to remember.) One second, Don is driving in his car, miserable and alone in the present; the next, he's back in that idyllic moment last fall at the end of his "Tomorrowland" vacation with Megan and the kids.
A few episodes ago, Raymond from Heinz and Megan bantered back and forth about the title of The Rolling Stones' "Time Is On My Side," and this was an episode where it felt like time was on its side — and upside down, and backwards and forwards all at once.
The non-linear nature of the episode suggests that we're seeing versions of the same story, over and over, just unstuck in time. Peggy is trying to become the Don of 1960, only it's not working out so well for her because a woman can't get away with the work and home life that Don Draper led back in the day. Don has become the Roger of 1963, only the dissolution of his marriage seems to be going faster and uglier because Don is more volatile than the easy-going, charming Roger.
And Roger? Roger's at the end of this particular story. Peggy and Don's relationships are in trouble, but they haven't faced that truth yet. They're still playing with what's true and false, what's possibly true, necessarily true, etc. Roger, though, has taken LSD, and rather than some clichéd cartoon about the middle-aged square having a bad trip(*), we see the drug accomplish exactly what its users intended: it shows them the clear, unvarnished truth of their lives. And the sad but obvious truth is that even if Roger loved Jane once — which he insists he did, in a beautiful line reading from John Slattery — he doesn't anymore. And she doesn't love him, and they shouldn't be together. And even though Roger's supposed to be the man who, like Brian Wilson in the Beach Boys song playing during the acid trip, just wasn't made for these times, he reacts to the trip and its revelations not with anger, confusion or regret, but peace. He hasn't been happy — we've seen that for a good long while now — and even though it's going to halve his fortune for a second time, he's okay with letting go of this depressing lie.
(*) I did love the few baroque details we got from Roger's perspective, particularly the bottle of Stoli playing thunderous Russian music whenever the cap was removed. I feel like that's going to be a selling point in the next round of those ads where Michael Imperioli asks what your tequila can do for you.
Peggy spends part of the episode under the influence of a less potent drug, but it doesn't tell her much of anything about herself, save that she's amenable to giving a hand job to a total stranger in a darkened theater if the mood is right. Don has left her stranded all season — a situation that only Peggy and Bert Cooper seem to recognize — and forced to essentially do Don's job for him, she responds by acting very much like Don in the Heinz meeting. We've already seen that she can do a Draper-style pitch, dating all the way back to the Popsicle account in season two, but here we got not only the Draper pitch, but the classic Draper guilt trip that follows whenever the client acts too hesitant. But Don Draper can pull that off, where all it does is raise the hackles of the old-fashioned, paternalistic Raymond. So she takes another page out of the vintage Draper playbook with a mid-day movie, which turns into an anonymous sexual encounter, before she's finally shocked back into reality by hearing the tragic origin story of Michael Ginsberg.
Michael's a character unstuck in time as well, trapped in memories of his past that he's tried to erase by wrapping them in a science-fiction story about refugees from Mars. Just as the guests at Roger and Jane's party talk about whether the truth is the same on different planets, we know that Michael's truth is the same no matter where you are in time and space, and it sucks, and it no doubt plays a huge role in his behavioral difficulties. But there's a glimmer of hope, perhaps, in the exchange he has with Peggy, where she asks (playing along with the Mars story) if there are others like him, and he says, sadly, "I haven't been able to find any." Peggy's history isn't tragic on such a grand scale, but she's more like Michael than he realizes, and maybe they can connect, either as colleagues or as more whenever Peggy recognizes that she and Abe are done as anything but sex buddies.
During the Heinz pitch, Peggy manages to suck Raymond back into the past for a time, but Raymond rejects the concept under the mistaken belief that young people don't have the same affinity for the past that his generation does. Peggy argues that they do, and maybe with Don there, she could have convinced him; on her own, it's a disaster that gets her booted from the account. But when Don tries to take Megan on a time trip with the orange sherbet, it's his own nostalgia he's focused on, and not any experience of hers, and it's the breaking point in what started out as an uncomfortable day for them and ends as a very ugly one.
They start playing out every old argument they've ever had, and then Megan says, without realizing what she's saying, "Why don't you call your mother?" And then Don's tumbling even further into the past, back to being little Dick Whitman, whore-son, growing up in a home with a drunk and a woman who resented him, and Megan's words have stung him as badly as any said to him over the course of the series, and the only response Don is capable of is the trick the hobo taught him: to run away as quickly as possible. And by the time he recognizes that this kind of behavior won't stand anymore and runs back, Megan's vanished from the Howard Johnson's, leaving only her sunglasses as a clue to fill him with worry, and anxiety and — when Don returns to the apartment to find her alive and well and not answering his panicked calls — anger. And suddenly we're unstuck in time yet again, cycling in between the angry but consensual sex play of the season premiere and the horror movie nightmare of the Richard Speck episode. This isn't a dream, though. This is Don Draper, awake and (mostly) functional chasing his wife through their apartment like he's the villain in a slasher movie.
This is far more unnerving than anything we see during Roger's acid trip. This is real. This is happening. This is our hero (more or less) and for a few moments, he is a monster.
Megan forgives him, for now, when she sees the pain and fear in his eyes. But after last week suggested that Don might have finally found some contentment in his marriage, here we see the truth — not the possibly true, not the necessarily true, but the true — and it's that this marriage is built on a wobbly foundation, that the fights are going to keep coming and keep getting worse, and that Don is letting his work life atrophy as badly as Roger did during his own mid-life crisis marriage.
We end with another blast from the past, as Bert Cooper reminds us he's not there just for name value and an open checkbook. He confronts Don with the truth of what's going on in that place, and Don looks backwards and forwards, not sure if any of what he thought was real actually is. Don thought he had his present, his future and even his past figured out, and maybe none of that's true.
I came to the end of "Far Away Places" not instantly sure how I felt about it — or, in some ways, what it was about. (And with an episode this idiosyncratic, I imagine I may be way off the mark on a whole lot of it.) But the more I've thought about it, and written about it over these last few hours, the more impressed I am with it. It seems such an obvious thing for the show to do an LSD episode at this point of the calendar, and yet they pulled it off in a way I never would have expected, with an episode that gave the feel of dropping acid even when everyone on camera was stone sober. Matt Weiner, co-writer Semi Chellas, director Scott Hornbacher and the actors combined to give us some of the most memorable moments the show has ever done involving Peggy (the explosion at the end of the Heinz pitch), Roger (the sad conversation while lying on the rug at the end of the acid trip) and Don (the chase through the apartment).
This season feels more formally experimental than the previous ones, with the nightmare atmosphere of the Richard Speck episode, the unexpected mix of comedy and violence in last week's boxing match, and now... this. At 1:41 a.m. in the morning after it aired, I'm still not sure I understood 100% of it. But I know I liked it. A lot.
Some other thoughts:
* This week's headline comes courtesy of my friend (and Chicago Tribune business columnist) Phil Rosenthal. The runner-up headline, by the way, came courtesy of Fienberg: "Two For the Road," the title of the great 1967 film with Audrey Hepburn and Albert Finney about the gradual crumbling dissolution of a marriage that was once idyllic, also told out-of-sequence.
* Credit to those of you who, after the Richard Speck episode aired, suggested that Michael's discomfort with the crime scene photos came because he was the son of a Holocaust survivor. I dismissed the idea, figuring that he was too old (at least 25 in 1966) for him to have been born in America and have the accent that he has. But given the truth of things, I could see a five-year-old Michael shedding any trace of what he learned in the camp, or in the Swedish orphanage, and building an accent and a personality out of what he was exposed to in New York.
* It's funny: as I watched the HoJo's scenes, I became convinced it was the same set, slightly redressed, they had used for the "Tomorrowland" scene where the kids spill the milkshake and Megan's okay with it. Then I cued up that scene on Netflix, and the two don't look remotely alike.
* For most of this season, each episode has opened with an extremely long opening act before the first ad break (last week's was close to 20 minutes, I think), followed by much shorter acts after that. I don't know if there's now a set formula for how long the first act should run, but the structure of the episode made it feel like the commercial should have come sooner, either right after we saw Peggy waiting alone in her apartment for Abe, or else after the Don/Roger scene established the time-loop structure of the episode.
* I've resisted the idea that Jane was Jewish, despite the mounting evidence — her name, Danny Strong playing her cousin, Harry mocking Danny by saying "You're such a Jew!" — because it seemed like the show would have made a much bigger deal out of this circa 1962/63. In what may be her final appearance, we got one last piece of evidence I couldn't ignore, with the bit about Jane speaking Yiddish while quoting her father. Oh, well. I still think that should've been dealt with back in season 2 or 3.
* Because I've only ever watched "Justified" — a show with a reputation for having terrible-looking green screen work whenever a scene involves characters talking while driving — on unfinished DVD screeners, I can't speak to whether the Don/Megan scenes looked any worse than what "Justified" does. That says, they didn't look any worse than many actual green screen driving scenes of the mid-'60s, and I'll let it go for that reason.
* Great to see Bess Armstrong (Patty Chase from "My So-Called Life," among many other roles) as Jane's LSD-dropping shrink.
* My father's half of the family is from Montreal, and we'd drive up there a couple of times a year when I was a kid. Same route every time, and every time we'd make one last stop for food, bathrooms, etc., at the McDonald's in Plattsburgh. Never noticed the Howard Johnson's in town. Apparently, it's closed. I'd feel sad, but no one in my family has much of a taste for orange sherbet.
What did everybody else think?
Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
News From Our Partners
-
Tolerability Index: This week we're barely putting up with The Killing
TV Roundtable: When My Boys tested its prickly chemistry by inviting some new faces to the poker table
The Walkthrough: The New Girl showrunners on topping season two’s big kiss (Part 5 of 5)
-
What to Watch Tonight: The Season Finales of Arrow, CSI, and Supernatural
Grimm "The Waking Dead" Review: Dead On Arrival
CBS's 2013-2014 Season: New Nights for Person of Interest and Hawaii Five-0, More Comedy on Thursdays
-
The Telefile - TNT & TBS Upfront 2013: Reaping What Other Networks Sowed
The Telefile - Fall TV 2013: What's On When
The Telefile - New Girl: Wedding Do's and Don'ts
-
'Star Trek' Baddie Benedict Cumberbatch Reveals Role's Biggest Challenge
Cannes Film Festival 2013: Our Must-See Movies
'Star Trek Into Darkness': The Secret Behind The Sounds
-
Demi Moore & Ashton Kutcher in $10M Tug of War
'Captain America: The Winter Soldier': Chris Evans, Scarlett Johansson, Anthony Mackie Spotted in D.C. (VIDEO)
Katie Holmes Attracts the Wrong Kind of Attention on 'Mania Days' Set
-
'Riddick' Trailer: Vin Diesel Is What Goes Bump in the Night
'The Simpsons' Taps Kristen Wiig For Guest Arc As FBI Agent
CBS Fall 2013 Schedule: 'Mike & Molly' to 2014, More Comedy Thursday, and 'Hawaii' to Friday
-
In Pictures: The Stars of Star Trek Into Darkness
Digital Multiplex: The Last Stand, Side Effects, and More
RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Ambitious, Time-Jumping Epic Cloud Atlas
-
Hulu.com: 7 Things That Wouldn't Exist Without The Office
Larry Womack: In Defense of (the Original) James T. Kirk
'Storage Wars': Ivy Finds Giant Clam Shell
Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching
Latest Posts
-
Some experimenting, but mostly the same old, successful CBSWednesday, May 15, 2013
-
A badger gets loose at Cece's wedding, and Nick and Jess ponder their futureTuesday, May 14, 2013
-
Has the show solved Winston yet? What stories would she redo?Tuesday, May 14, 2013
-
Dan and Alan break down the first batch of fall schedulesTuesday, May 14, 2013


Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
Next 481 CommentsCade
April 23, 2012 at 1:55AM EST Reply to CommentSo have you just given up all pretenses of waiting until Monday mornings to do these? (I'm not complaining).
Hudders 1.41am *is* Monday morning.
April 23, 2012 at 6:02PM ESTJames
April 23, 2012 at 1:56AM EST Reply to CommentPretty sure the HoJo diner was the same as the diner in Pulp Fiction(non-linear story telling connect!). It's somewhere in the Valley.
LJA Torrance.
April 23, 2012 at 2:00AM ESTKC Nope. The diner in this episode was Rod's Grill in Arcadia, CA. Also where they filmed recent scenes for "Luck."
April 23, 2012 at 2:43AM ESTGeoff It definately was the same diner from Pulp Fiction. And it was planned, on Weiner's behalf. That's what makes the writing of this episode incredibly great - it was about three stories woven into one, just like Tarantino's movie - it was not a coincidence.
April 23, 2012 at 5:34AM ESTBrilliant episode.
Kevin The diner in Pulp Fiction was demolished in the mid 90's.
April 23, 2012 at 6:44AM ESTPF Thought I'd read that the diner shown in Tomorrowland is the same one from Pulp Fiction...
April 23, 2012 at 6:54AM ESTHerb P The Hawthorne Grill was the filming site for "Pulp Fiction" and it was demolished some time ago. Some things from the restaurant were moved to Pann's Restaurant in the Crenshaw neighborhood.
April 23, 2012 at 8:16AM ESTHuell Goodman Another excellent tagline, Alan.
April 23, 2012 at 8:28AM ESTInteresting to see HoJo as something of a classy upscale novelty restaurant. Don and Meagan seemed so excited to be there (well, at first). It definitely clashes with my childhood memories of Hojo as a chain of shady dives during it's twilight years. In fact, I'm pretty sure as a child I saw Don Draper sleeping in a HoJo restaurant in New Jersey - except he was 35 years older, drooling and wearing a ripped cardigan covered in hashbrown crumbs.
Thinking back, there was always a certain nostalgia surrounding Howard Johnson's that I never quite understood. Actually, for a while I thought the place was owned by the the old Mets third basemen (it was even orange!).
I do recall a sadness in NYC when the one in Times Square finally closed in the late 90s (??).
James Yup, after further research, it wasn't the Pulp Fiction diner...but damn, sure as hell looked like it.
April 23, 2012 at 1:56PM ESTpotzer37 The diner from "Tomorrowland" is actually Mel's Diner on Sunset Blvd. in W. Hollywood.
April 23, 2012 at 3:30PM ESTSharmayne Sharp observation by Megan that HoJo's aren't a destination but are places you eat/stay at when you're on your way elsewhere. (Maybe that's a metaphor for their marriage.) One of my favorite HoJo's was located at an airport hotel. I loved the fried clams.
April 23, 2012 at 3:50PM ESTLJA The Tomorrowland diner was actually Bob's Big Boy Broiler in Downey. http://la.curbed.com/archives/2012/03/a_guide_to_mad_men_filming_locations_in_los_angeles_1.php#pointmap
April 23, 2012 at 3:57PM ESTMichael R Amazing how some people can be so sure about something that's totally untrue..maybe think before you speak?
April 23, 2012 at 5:15PM ESTMr Belvedere Wow! How can so many people be so sure about so many locations? What transpired above is amazing...
April 23, 2012 at 8:50PM ESTIlyrio
April 23, 2012 at 1:58AM EST Reply to CommentThere you are, immature man-baby Don! I've missed you so much!
Alanna This episode definitely reminded me of Jon Hamm's surprise that many fans actually consider Don Draper to be a "good guy".
April 23, 2012 at 9:52AM ESTrockknj I always thought of Don as an empty man, not bad or good but sometimes doing good and sometimes doing bad just because circumstances led that way.
April 25, 2012 at 12:19AM ESTanon Hes rotten to the core and im looking forward to his inevitable killing spree that has been foreshadowed all series long
June 24, 2012 at 11:04PM ESTEd
April 23, 2012 at 1:59AM EST Reply to CommentI loved the shot of the darkness creeping over Peggy; it was a nice reversal from the pilot episode of the light creeping over Don as he takes his nap.
Ilyrio Great catch.
April 23, 2012 at 2:05AM ESTJohn G
April 23, 2012 at 1:59AM EST Reply to CommentI loved the time loop. Interesting episode. I didn't realize the "Peggy is 1960 Don, and Don is 1963 Roger" angle till now.
Brian
April 23, 2012 at 2:00AM EST Reply to CommentI'd like to think that this episode will give Don a chance to see that the path he has been following in the months after the marriage will fail, but that he has a chance to fix it. He's now heard from Megan that she takes her work seriously and doesn't want to keep leaving it at his whim, and from Cooper that other people are now noticing the lack of his presence at work. Having both of these happen at the same time may be able to snap him out of whatever stupor he has been in and fix things.
Dave I I don't know if Don & Megan are meant to work. I think, similar to Roger and Jane in a strange way, Don wanted on some level Megan however maybe that is not what he really desire, or simply maybe she is not what he needs. They want it to work, and it is possible that they could make it work, I am simply unsure if they are entirely compatible. I am unsure if Don is done evolving for that matter. Looking at Megan, I think she wants the illusion. She loves Don, yet does not understand him.
April 23, 2012 at 10:12AM ESTI think it could go either way. In Don's fever-dream episode, I found it interesting that Don succumbed to his sex addiction in his dream, yet also viewed Megan as his salvation complete with the majestic halo of light as he woke up and saw her there. I also thought it poignant that after their argument in last night's episode, they did NOT have sex (which seems almost more compulsory with Don than necessarily something done out of love) and had a conversation. For Don, that is both unexpected and perhaps meaningful for somebody who uses sex the way an alcoholic uses the bottle. However, as Megan said, every fight diminishes what they have. I am not sure that is true as an absolute (I'm married and arguments will happen). If we take a look at what they are fighting about, why, and how, there seems to be a fundamental lack of understanding about the other. Maybe Megan was trying to hurt Don with the comment about his mom, maybe she just does not understand him enough to pull back. Which is worse? Don regressed a bit in his maturation yet turned the car around after ditching his wife and showed she really means a lot to him. Is that enough? Is he so desperate for Megan or for what their marriage represents, as for what their failed marriage might mean? How much can (or should) Don change, and will it be soon enough or even a change that is closer or further from what Megan thought she married when she said yes?
Overall, I am curious to see what corrective actions Don takes, both personally, with his marriage, and at work.
-Cheers
Ilyrio
April 23, 2012 at 2:03AM EST Reply to CommentPlease please please let the Bert Cooper scene be a lead-in to him taking a more active role in the plot.
Lazy Iggy Totally agree. I also loved that scene because it is a reminder that Bert sees more than he is seen.
April 23, 2012 at 2:07AM ESTkelevra The not-so-subtle reminder that Bert's face on the money in Roger's pocket coupled with the brilliance of that one liner - 'this *is* my business' - before he walks out on Don makes me believe that we're going to see a lot more of Mr Cooper before the season's up...
April 23, 2012 at 9:09AM ESThampshi Except for last season, when they literally emasculated him, Coop's purpose seems to be there to come in at least once a season to smack Don upside the head.
April 23, 2012 at 10:20AM ESTSara I literally applauded when Bert said, "This IS my business." I thought the delivery had the perfect balance of despair and honesty.
April 23, 2012 at 11:02AM ESTvirginia Indeed! I've loved seeing 3 of the older guys -- Lane, Roger, and Bert -- somehow able to navigate the 60s better than the younger set. A subtle and effective reminder of the wisdom that comes with age.
April 23, 2012 at 1:27PM ESTSharmayne The Bert scene was worth the whole hour. I was struck by the aftermath with Don alone in the conference room watching integral members of his professional and personal life pass by.
April 23, 2012 at 3:53PM ESTTay-ed Yes, me too... Wonder if any meaning to Peggy walking in one direction and the others walking the other way?
May 29, 2012 at 10:55PM ESTcarey_adams
April 23, 2012 at 2:04AM EST Reply to CommentHow much fun would it be to trip with Roger?
Phenomenal episode. It kind of came out of nowhere, and I hope they continue to mess with our expectations a little bit this season.
Lazy Iggy
April 23, 2012 at 2:05AM EST Reply to CommentThis episode left me feeling very disoriented...not just the various timelines, but also what I think I know and expect from these characters.
I am a bit worried about Peggy...is Don like downward spiral in her cards? Will she be punching male partners for gratification?
Michael G.
April 23, 2012 at 2:05AM EST Reply to CommentI think I could watch Don Draper kick in doors all day long. I hope we get a third before the end of the series.
Bonnie memories of Rhett Butler in GWTW!.............
April 24, 2012 at 10:44AM ESTKaren
April 23, 2012 at 2:05AM EST Reply to CommentThe interior at HoJo's was a vintage coffee shop in Arcadia called Rod's Grill. I was in there late last year and was surprised to see the turquoise booths. I wonder if the show reupholstered them for this episode.
DC I was wondering where on earth they would find a HoJo in such mint condition.
April 23, 2012 at 9:38AM ESTThe HoJo was also a good site for highlighting the generation (and perhaps class) difference between Don and Megan. Don takes it as axiomatic that Megan would love the Hojo -- as well he might: for all Don's sophistication, he also deeply sympathizes with the mass culture kitsch of mid-century America, as much of it is about wiping the slate clean. His generation wanted to forget about the war(s), and begin again on a sparkling new Formica table.
But for Megan, who is not only younger but grew up in Montreal, there's the possibility that the HoJo would be hopelessly middlebrow, with the Day-Glo sherbert (which I loved as a kid, by the way) striking her as tacky and unsubtle.
I recognize that the HoJo was also the idealized site of the Tomorrowland for Don, and that he hoped that they would both look at it that way. But that episode was largely seen through Don's eyes, and all he could see was the Hojo as the site of his own happiness: perhaps Megan, at the time, saw the HoJo as little more than a practical place to take the kids for milkshakes.
Recall Don's distaste for antiquing, revealed at the breakfast nook in some episode from season 3.
Jackie Childs So, in other words: Don went to HoJo to forget Tojo, but instead he lost his Mojo?
April 23, 2012 at 10:13AM ESTDC Ha! Just, so, Jackie. Nicely done.
April 23, 2012 at 10:24AM ESTMimsy Touché, Jackie!
April 23, 2012 at 10:34AM ESTab Don's war was Korea...
April 23, 2012 at 11:05AM ESTJ-Mart I don't buy that Megan is culturally snobbish toward the HoJo; if so, why would she slurp up distasteful orange sherbet like a hungry cow, only to spit it out in a paper napkin? No, she was showing Don that she was not a puppet and he can't make her like his life. It was a statement of equality, which he rejected by driving off.
April 23, 2012 at 2:29PM ESTMiriam
April 23, 2012 at 2:05AM EST Reply to CommentTwo for the Road is not about the dissolution of a marriage. It ends with a reconcilation and bemused, slighly angry, acceptance.
sepinwall But they make things work in the past, too, and then things get bad again. Admittedly, it's been years since I watched it, but my recollection is that it's a movie about why these two are wrong for each other, keep being drawn back together, but are ultimately doomed.
April 23, 2012 at 2:11AM ESTritz Not doomed. They stay together. Brilliant, brilliant, film.
April 23, 2012 at 9:21AM ESTvirginia I agree that Audrey and Albert don't end up doomed in Two for the Road. They each have affairs after a period of unhappiness and drifting apart but her affair in particular, with a dashing European, brings them both round to one another. One of my favorite films back in the day -- have seen it many, many times. Hepburn was never more beautiful. And Finney was outstanding in the role.
April 23, 2012 at 10:03AM ESTRaerae Never seen Two For The Road, but the fact that Don and Megan end up on the carpet, on their backs, and talking to eachother but looking off into the distance - well, it was exactly like Jane and Roger's final chitchat earlier in the episode. Is it over for Don and Megan but no one wants to say it?
April 23, 2012 at 10:49AM ESTRene
April 23, 2012 at 2:06AM EST Reply to CommentCompletely agree about not knowing what to think about the episode. All I know is I literally exclaimed during the episode "This Is Trippy!" So I think the writers got the reaction they wanted out of me. I'm also interested in seeing what everyone thought about the very end where Peggy walked one way and then the other three copywriters walked past her in the opposite direction. I saw it as Peggy losing her fire for this job, but I could be completely wrong. I may need to re-watch this episode.
Kimberly Interesting observation to think about. I don't think Peggy's "losing her fire" though. I agree with Mr. Sepinwall that she does a good job because she's basically taking over for Don, and she just decided to disagree with the client as Don has done. It's just that she's seen as "a little girl", as Cooper called her, and the Heinz guy compared her to his daughter, so she had less of an impact as, say, Don would have made.
April 23, 2012 at 2:50AM ESTI have no clue how to interpret her walking against everyone else though... I am intrigued to read others' thoughts.
Adam Kimberly, I thought "the little girl" Coop was referring to was Megan.
April 23, 2012 at 3:21AM ESTJerseyRudy I thought Cooper was referring to Peggy. He was chastising Don for turning over the work to Peggy. No doubt the same pitch made by Don instead of Peggy to the Heinz exec would have worked; the Heinz exec would have been persuaded by the same words coming out of Don's mouth.
April 23, 2012 at 6:20AM ESTritz God, I felt bad for Peggy in that presentation!
April 23, 2012 at 9:23AM ESTEmma Cooper did mean Peggy...I was taken aback by his comment. I thought Peggy would have earned more respect by this point, even from an oldtimer like Bert. I guess however much headway Peggy's made at the firm, a reminder that it's still a boy's club, and will be for many years to come.
April 23, 2012 at 10:38AM ESThampshi Peggy has always been going back and forth between insecurity and over-confidence at work. There are bona-fide flashes in the pan, but she's never been as good at "the pitch" like Don or even Ginsburg is and I think she knows it. I think that's why she blew up at Raymond. Her Heinz campaign is really good, and Raymond's ideas are bad. But since she's a woman, she can't sell her best work, even while imitating the men she works with.
April 23, 2012 at 10:39AM ESTTMB Is it possible Cooper could have been referring to both Peggy and Megan and kept it intentionally ambiguous?
April 23, 2012 at 11:13AM ESTMary The thing I thought when I saw Peggy going one way and the younger three going the other way was the great age divide, Peggy still trying to fit into Don's shoes but the others grasping for the change from photography taking over drawing to Megan knowing all things young and Ginsburg wanting to fit into a world that is not Mars. I also thought of the opposite saying of when a door opens another one closes when Roger announces It's a beautiful Day. Why did I get the feeling it was opening for Roger and closing for Don.
April 23, 2012 at 1:36PM ESTT Sill I don't think anybody would refer to Megan as a "little girl." And, Peggy has been running Don's department. Even the ancient Bert Cooper wouldn't think of Megan as a "little girl." And, Peggy gives off a "little girl" vibe physically...right down to that goofy little laugh she has when she's drinking or getting high...
April 23, 2012 at 4:27PM ESTSharmayne Anyone notice how much more drinking Peggy is doing on the job?
April 23, 2012 at 11:14PM ESTBonnie My thought as Peggy walked past the conference room the opposite way from the 3 male copywriters was that it represented Peggy's struggle against the tide to succeed in a "man's world" at SCD. She asked Dawn last week if she was acting too much like a man, then punches Gabe in bed when she is supposed to act like a woman, then succumbs as a woman to a stranger in a movie theater, tries to absorb Don's persona on his couch and finally walks in the opposite direction from the others in front of Don after the "little girl" comment. This show is SO much fun to analyze!
April 24, 2012 at 11:06AM ESTrockknj I took it as Coop clearly restating what the Heinz man called Peggy i.e. the "little girl", when the Heinz man demanded Peggy be removed from the project. In no way did I see Coop as personally calling Peggy a little girl.
April 25, 2012 at 12:33AM ESTchloe.cyteval I thought this scene was more about Don. He is in the conference room, alone, and he sees the others walking by because he has excluded himself from the SCDP world and now he realizes it. I am not sure this is about Peggy, I might be wrong, but I remember Megan walks by with the guys, isn't she? in that case it can't be about Peggy being a woman.
April 25, 2012 at 3:39AM ESTa few episodes ago, when she invited Dawn at her place, she said she didn't want to act like a man, but in this episode she did act exactly as one and it didn't work out. I think she is going to realize that and we are going to see a whole new Peggy from now on (I hope so!)
irieagogo
April 23, 2012 at 2:07AM EST Reply to CommentThis was a really weird episode. Ifelt creepy scared during the Don chases Megan around the house scene. I thought something really terrible was going to happen to her. Don doesn't realize he cannot treat her the same ways he did Betty. She argues back, wants more respect and demands it. I really won't be able to handle it if they go into a domestic abuse cycle. Him weeping on his knees was so typical of the begging for forgiveness phase, then the nothing-is- wrong-with-us walk through the office and the smiles of the hearts and flowers making up phase felt so ominous.
evie Agree on all accounts. It was a horrible, violent scene and I hope they will not let Don go there again.
April 23, 2012 at 5:38AM ESTAlso, I like Megan and the way she expects more from Don and stands up to him. However, twice now she's said horrible things to Don about his past -- once, during the birthday episode she said, "Nobody loves Dick Whitman," and then tonight the truly over-the-line remark about his mother. I don't think she said it without thinking, as Alan does. She said it because she wanted to lash out. There are just some things you don't say to people you love, no matter how angry you are.
Gotham Goddess I honestly thought two times during that scene he was going to hit her: when she started hitting him because he grabbed her and when he finally grabbed her after chasing her. I found the ending so disturbing. Don has NEVER felt this desperate before where he actually has to physically control someone! He could always do it mentally- with manipulation and intellect. This shows me how out of control he feels in this love. Dick/Don being in love for the first time is scary.
April 23, 2012 at 8:32AM ESTkElevrA I got the feeling this was purposefully done to resemble the tumultuous experience of an acid trip. From the bright lights of the diner to the darker, more ominous lighting when Megan is lost to Don. Their apartment was also dimly lit when things spiralled so rapidly out of control and then finally back to the brightly lit office where Megan forgives him with a tearful nod. The cinematography in this episode was excellent to say the least.
April 23, 2012 at 9:19AM ESTDidn't know what to make of the very last scene though. Anyone else feel it was reminiscent of the title sequence?
Kitsy1398 Why do people think Betty was such a doormat? When she was finally confronted with proof of his infidelity, she kicked him out. She showed she was not afraid of him when he seemed ready to hit her and he backed down. And in the end, she left Don and the other way around, against his wishes. Megan has apparently forgiven him for abandoning her in the middle of nowhere and then chasing her around the apartment like a runaway dog. Don never treated Betty that badly, at least not to her face.
April 23, 2012 at 10:40AM ESThampshi Evie, look at Megan's face after she made the mother comment. She realizes her mistake right after it comes out and is immediately apologetic. Everything is too close to the surface with Megan. While Don was unhappy that Betty was frosty and distant, it did keep the cap on Don. In their heated moments, he did push Betty and call her a whore, but he never lost control like this.
April 23, 2012 at 10:53AM ESTAfter the fever dream, the idea that Don is capable of real violence towards women makes these physical fights with Megan all the more frightening.
Kelly I've been sitting on the fence this season, as I did not feel as engaged with the characters, storylines, etc., but this episode changed all that. Mad Men was back to its old brilliance and I find myself mulling over the details the way I used to. Kelevra, great observations about the cinematography resembling an acid trip. Also, as someone who has worked with abused women, the scenes with Don and Megan were very authentic and well done and set the stage for the inevitable decline of their relationship. I was very worried for Megan's character and it added another note of the surreal in that one of their neighbour's didn't call the police given the violence of their encounter. In real life, abused women are most vulnerable when their partners feel abandoned by them. Even though Don was the one who initially abandoned Megan, the fact that she wasn't passively waiting for him to return to the restaurant shook up his sense of reality and led to the extreme rage we saw in the later scenes. Megan's comment about their relationship being "diminished" was very poignant and served to set the dynamic between them as being something destructive. A pattern is being set: they each target one another's vulnerabilities in times of stress. I am very interested to see where the writers will take this.
April 23, 2012 at 11:12AM ESTLisa Kelevra, I also thought the final scenes were deliberately echoing the title sequence. Beautifully done.
April 23, 2012 at 1:35PM ESTBcolangelo I thought the exact same thing about the last scene: the reflection of the building on the door as Don settles into his seat. Watched it three times to make sure. Glad I wasn't the only one, and may even get to win an argument with my wife on this one. Maybe.
April 23, 2012 at 6:18PM ESTStephanie I think this is the beginning of more violoence on Don's part toward the women in his life. Shoving Betty infront of the baby, the dream/fantasy of choking out a lover, chasing Megan around the apartment (what if he had caught her)...it's getting more intense every time. I didn't know who Richard Speck was until I read the Wikipedia article on him. Interesting Bill Curtis interview information there, along with a psychological profile of Speck, including a diagnosis of "madonna-prostitute" syndrome. Shockingly like Don Draper.
April 27, 2012 at 7:09AM ESTleahblizz
April 23, 2012 at 2:12AM EST Reply to CommentSo both Peggy and Pete and trying to be "the new Don", and both are failing in their own ways. Very interesting.
leahblizz ARE trying to be "the new Don". Ugh.
April 23, 2012 at 2:13AM ESTvirginia What an interesting observation!
April 23, 2012 at 1:38PM ESTT Sill Peggy only fails because she's a woman in 1965, 1966. She has the talent and the drive and the instinct. Pete's failing because he lacks all those things.
April 23, 2012 at 4:29PM ESTleahblizz Agreed T Sill. It's not Peggy's fault that she's failing--she's merely failing because of her gender and how people expect her to act because of it. Pete possesses none of the qualities necessary to "become Don".
April 23, 2012 at 8:10PM ESTrobwein I'd say the larger point here is that while both P's are trying to be the New Don, the show's view is that that is a reprehensible goal. Failure is thus a good thing.
April 25, 2012 at 4:39PM ESTBenS
April 23, 2012 at 2:13AM EST Reply to CommentFirst, I kept thinking that this was like an episode of Community (Remedial Chaos Theory specifically, and this weeks as well) because of how they played with time and perception of time. Second, I thought that Jane sounded like Tina from "Bob's Burgers" when she and Roger we're laying on the floor.
I wasn't sure if the scene of Don and Megan and the kids driving back was a flashback (because of the Mickey Mouse hats) or a hallucination.
Levi Benjamin Totally agree, I've thought this entire season has been like Community, with every episode trying to achieve something thematically, and stylistically, almost evoking a certain movie from the past. This episode was by fart the most Community-like of the bunch.
April 23, 2012 at 12:16PM ESTAs interesting a route they've been taking, I much prefer the old Mad Men that wowed us with the truth of human experience, rather than making sure to provide a weekly homage to pop culture.
BenS I didn't mean so much that they were doing homages, but this episode really seemed to be getting at (as really the whole series does) how people view themselves. And because of recent Community eps, I was reminded of them.
April 23, 2012 at 11:31PM ESTIt was also just a really trippy 5 days of television.
chloe.cyteval i think playing with the time line is not something Community invented, it is done since (at least) Pulp fiction, maybe it's just the proximity of the two episodes that made everyone do the connection.
April 25, 2012 at 4:00AM ESTLevi Benjamin: you sound like Roger wanting things to go back the way it was before! (don't take this the wrong way, I'm just kidding). every episodes of mad men have been talking about a specific theme since the very first season. but mostly, every season has a very different construction. that's, from my point of view, the whole point of Mad Men. Nothing is ever going to "go back to normal", everything is evolving, both the story and the structure of the episodes. and that's precisely because the characters can't evolve with their time that they are falling again and again. I am not sure this is an homage to pop culture.
so far i have NEVER guessed right what was going to happened next on Mad Men, so I wander how the 7th season is going to end!
QuentinCold
April 23, 2012 at 2:14AM EST Reply to CommentAlan,
Longtime reader, first time poster. Thanks yet again for staying up to post your Mad Men review!
Every time I think Bert Cooper should be put out to pasture, he surprises me. Whenever he does surface, he usually impresses, as he did tonight. I can't imagine anyone else at SCDP who could have pulled off delivering that message to Don (and be taken seriously). It was a deft and succinct maneuver. Despite his initial protestations, Don knew that Bert was right. I can only hope he brings back his A-game...
Loved Roger's trip. At first, I really did think he was somehow immune to the acid until he opened the vodka bottle. The Silver Fox is about to be re-released into the wild!
Adam Released into the wild or finally being with Joan?
April 23, 2012 at 3:23AM ESTPreston Does Cooper know about Dick Whitman? I seem to remember that he does. In other words Don has to listen to him for reasons beyond just his stature in the company.
April 23, 2012 at 3:48AM ESTed newman Coop does know. Pete ratted Don out. Coop's response? "Who Cares?"
April 23, 2012 at 7:33AM ESTQuentinCold Cooper hasn't often raised the Dick Whitman issue to hang over Don (like Pete Campbell tried to), but I believe he did reference it obliquely to compel Don to sign the employment contract before Sterling Cooper was acquired by the British agency.
April 23, 2012 at 8:35AM ESTI agree with the commenter who posted that Cooper sees more than he is see. He appears out of touch and irrelevant, but he is right on the money when he does act, usually at the opportune moment. I would love to have seen him in his prime!
Kathryn Quentincold - You're right about Cooper using his Dick Whitman knowledge to get Don to sign his contract. He said something like, "Do you agree that I know things about you? So who's really signing this contract anyway?"
April 23, 2012 at 9:18AM ESTI like how Bert can control a situation with just a few words -- that he's not nearly as unnecessary as it would appear at times.
DC I just wish that Bert still had an office. He looks so pathetic rattling around in the conference room, his copy of the Wall Street Journal in hand. I also miss the artwork, which I believe Lane once referred to as "remarkable."
April 23, 2012 at 9:46AM ESTEmma You're right, no one else but Bert could have gotten away with rejecting Don's work and calling him out like that. Don's(John's) reaction and facial expression was perfect. I can't wait to see next week's Don Draper.
April 23, 2012 at 10:43AM ESTBeverly C Just to clarify: Don was pressured to sign the contract because of the Hilton business, not when PPL acquired Sterling Cooper. The fact that Don did not have a contract is what got Duck Phillips bounced from the company when he tried to bully Don in the initial meeting of the newly formed company. It was Conrad Hilton's lawyers who insisted that all the company's principals be tied to a contract.
April 23, 2012 at 2:02PM ESTQuentinCold Beverly C, you are correct!
April 23, 2012 at 7:24PM ESThttp://www.amctv.com/shows/mad-men/episodes/season-3/seven-twenty-three
ZacharyTF
April 23, 2012 at 2:17AM EST Reply to CommentI wonder if Matt Weiner tried to get Denis Leary to play his father? That would have been a trip, pun intended.
ZacharyTF, Denis Leary is of no relation to Timothy Leary. Also, I don't think that Jane's doctor's husband was actually supposed to be Timothy Leary. He was commenting on Leary's "product" rhetorically.
April 23, 2012 at 2:44AM ESTritz That was not intended to be Leary. At the time Dr. Leary was at Harvard doing experiments with graduate students.
April 23, 2012 at 9:27AM ESTDevdogAZ According to Wikipedia, Leary was fired from Harvard in 1963 and in 1966 he was hosting "turn on" parties at an estate in Poughkeepsie, which is not too far from Manhattan. I think that's too much of a coincidence for Weiner to reference Dr. Leary rhetorically.
April 23, 2012 at 2:17PM ESTTandoori Perhaps not, but it's very un-Weiner-like to have his characters directly involved with major historical and cultural figures a la Boardwalk Empire. Seems a little too in-your face for his writing style. Hard to say either way, as I don't think he was ever mentioned by name.
April 23, 2012 at 10:59PM ESTDr. Doctor The closed captioning referred to the doctor as "Leary."
April 24, 2012 at 12:42PM ESTSV2012 At first I didn't think of the doctor being Timothy Leary, but how interesting if he was! I'll have to watch the scene again. @Tandoori, Mad Men did have Don directly interacting with Conrad Hilton... not a major historical figure I suppose, but a real person who had an impact on society (and celeb culture via his great granddaughters)
May 11, 2012 at 12:08AM ESTEd
April 23, 2012 at 2:19AM EST Reply to CommentSince Roger's being edged out of the business, then out of his marriage, I think the man falling in the opening credits is Roger, who no longer fits in this world, and he's had enough of it.
(and by "had enough of it," I mean he jumps off a building)
leahblizz that's an interesting theory, but I think Roger was glad to get out of his marriage with Jane. He was clearly unhappy with her. Oh, and also, BOTH ROGER AND JOAN ARE SINGLE NOW OMG.
April 23, 2012 at 3:24AM ESTChe I agree with Leahblizz. Roger doesn't strike me as depressed or despondent enough to kill himself. He's happy to be out of the marriage--"relieved" is the word he used when he and Jane were talking--and even though he's struggling to figure out a role at work, he doesn't seem like he feels threatened to his core the way Pete does.
April 23, 2012 at 8:31AM ESTDC Roger's not *self-aware* enough to go that route, either. Every time he's confronted with his own shortcomings, he finds a way to deflect them, or blame them on someone else.
April 23, 2012 at 9:52AM ESTOne thing that struck me last week, during the subplot about Lane's failed efforts as an account man, was how good Roger's advice was to Lane: it was the mark of someone who does have a skill set, and who's rather good at it, when push comes to shove.
Though there's a possibility that that skill set -- knowing how to pace the drinks, knowing how to probe the client for weaknesses -- works less well with the younger clients that SCDP is soon going to be trying to pursue.
TSill You know...in 1965, 1966...people who felt marginalized didn't rush to therapy, then head for the nearest open window. Roger was miserable in his desire to stay young, be with younger women and throw his money around. He's quite aware now that the lust for younger, hotter women is pointless. Money only helps to a certain extent. He does actually enjoy the memory of when he was a vital part of the business and, despite what younger viewers might think, Roger is far from too old to contribute to the firm now. He actually CARES about Joan...she has his baby...she's on her own...he tried LSD and, actually, it did open many minds in that generation. So...I feel like Roger's positioned for better things...with Joan.
April 23, 2012 at 4:32PM ESTDetie AND - Just because he has not sold an account since Lucky Strike doesn't mean he can't. He may wake up on the morning and go to work!!
April 24, 2012 at 4:12PM ESTchloe.cyteval I think Roger has fell a few seasons ago, and it is precisely (according to me) because he has accepted the fact that he is no longer an account man, and that he is no longer in love with Jane, that he is happy. so if the opening credits were about him it would be a man crashed down the street ( and quite fine about it!)
April 25, 2012 at 4:05AM ESTKimberly
April 23, 2012 at 2:21AM EST Reply to CommentI thought Megan said, "Every time we fight it just diminishes US."
HWah I thought that as well. But I'm likely not helpful to your version as I thought she said in the HoJo to Don "what do you call your mother" rather than "why don't you call your mother". Those lead to very different conclusions, I'm going to have to watch again.
April 23, 2012 at 3:14AM ESTKimberly AHA! We were right, Hwah. I have captions on my TV, and I rewatched the episode. She indeed says, "...it diminishes us a little." I think saying "us" makes it a lot more personal and implies that the fighting diminishes them as a couple and both of them as persons.
April 23, 2012 at 4:06AM ESTritz I'm not using captions, but I have in the past with other shows, and just be aware, they sometimes make mistakes... not saying that they did, you just don't want to bet the farm on them.
April 23, 2012 at 9:29AM ESTswanstep Don't know what the captions say, but Megan definitely says "...diminishes this a little bit." I prefer the slight abstraction of 'this' - Megan's a very articulate, smart cookie and a close aware observer of things, and I buy that she'd say that and be thinking things slightly more abstractly.
April 23, 2012 at 9:51AM ESTI like Megan a lot. Don physically damaging her would be unforgivable. I'm praying that the show doesn't go there.
sepinwall I checked with AMC. It's "diminishes this."
April 23, 2012 at 12:12PM ESTTSill "...it diminishes THIS" was referring to their marriage...not the act of having rough, make-up sex.
April 23, 2012 at 4:33PM ESTKimberly Well I suppose I stand corrected. Mea culpa.
April 24, 2012 at 8:37PM ESTStill kinda wish she had said "us", not for the sake of being right, but I just felt it made more sense, and, as I said, encompassed more than just their failing marriage.
Don and Megan's relationship has got to be the weirdest Mad Men marriage. I feel like sometimes they truly think they're happy, like when Don proudly said he'd rather take Megan on the trip. But he's still quite lost, unlike Roger who finally came to the realization of his mid-life crisis and how unhappy he was with Jane.
And Megan breaking down crying broke my heart. What a transformation her character underwent from just some secretary (remember when Roger didn't even know who she was?) to now this broken woman.
Luke
April 23, 2012 at 2:24AM EST Reply to CommentThis felt like middle-year Sopranos episodes where Tony would hallucinate or have episode-long dreams. Interesting but it feels like the plot is stalling this season. Character development is there but are the storylines?
Bobhoff Exactly my feelings. I think people are mistaking great character development - which there has been this season - for great storylines, of which there have been almost none. There's just no true plot or proactive narrative this season. And I get that that's the point, to a extent, I just wish something story-wise was more integral to the theme of the season. Then again, we still have eight episodes left...
April 23, 2012 at 3:41AM ESTBlake I agree. The New York Times critic wrote before the season that Mad Men has become a soap opera. I can't get that out of my head now, but to be fair, more plot happens on a soap opera.
April 28, 2012 at 11:40AM ESTRemy
April 23, 2012 at 2:37AM EST Reply to CommentThis was a fantastic episode and great review this time Alan. I know the focus is on the acid trip and the dissolution of marriage(s) but I think this episode was about changing gender relations too (although I think this is always a subtext in the show). Peggy has been struggling with people's reactions to her more "masculine behavior" and growing assertiveness as her career progresses. I couldn't help but think that maybe the Heinz guy would have bought her pitch if she had been a man, since she got a bit aggressive. Megan wants to be treated like a professional/ creative worker and not just the trophy wife and plaything for Don. In some ways, Don doesn't seem to know how to relate to her--Betty was so child-like and he could just issue commands. Megan chafes against this, calling him "my master" in the best sarcastic MM line ever. She represents the new generation of young upstart women who have professional goals and want to be taken seriously.
And wasn't it obvious from the start that Roger would enjoy tripping the most!?
Huell Goodman Now that he's discovered LSD, maybe Roger will have a late career shift and become the new start of SDCP's creative team.
April 23, 2012 at 9:34AM ESTHuell Goodman Also, while sexism played an obvious role in Heinz' response, I think Peggy was in way over her head to think she could pull a Draper and lecture a major client. I don't think anyone else at the firm, regardless of sex, could pull that off. That's one of the reasons why Don is indispensable, and as high as his regard is for Peggy, it was inexcusable for him not to be at that meeting.
April 23, 2012 at 10:06AM ESTAlso, in an uncomfortable way, Mr. Heinz' sexism probably saved SCDP from losing the account. If a male had berated him like that he would have been out the door, but instead the "problem" is easily corrected by replacing the uppity woman with a man.
Peggy's fall is going to become Ginsberg's big break. Ginsberg is the type of young temperamental genius that Heinz is looking for - someone willing to tell the client what they want.
Kimberly
April 23, 2012 at 2:40AM EST Reply to CommentThank you, Mr. Sepinwall, for not keeping your word about waiting until the morning after to post reviews. I thoroughly enjoy coming to this site straight after watching the episode on TV.
I really like how, as you've said, this season has been so experimental with their storytelling. I think it fits right into the more radical times of the later 1960s.
I admit that I'm really sensitive to any kind of violence and hard drug use, so I was particularly on edge tonight. Especially when Don was chasing Megan around the apartment, I felt my heart pounding like no other. It's a side of Don (there I go again accidentally writing "Dong" and having to go back and correct myself...) that we know is there and we've seen creep through at times, but just to see it play out like that is terrifying. Not unlike his fever dream from "Mystery Date".
And, yeah, I thought about you when Jane mentioned her Yiddish-speaking father. Ho hum.
ritz I must say, I was with Alan on the Jane being Jewish thing. I just thought it would've been clearly stated in that era with those people.
April 23, 2012 at 9:39AM ESTI was NOT with Alan on the Michael Ginzburg thing, and I thought the revelation of that information was pure poetry. Even though it was off-beat and eccentric, finding a way to talk about it that brings all of the horror and sadness and loneliness to life is such a challenge. It was a beautifully acted, beautifully crafted scene, from the writing to the lighting as they say.
ab Both the Mars tale and the expression "unstuck in time" are pretty much Slaughterhouse-Five.
April 23, 2012 at 11:14AM ESTMary Well Ken is a science fiction writer. Maybe in a very Forrest Gump-like scene, Ken will introduce Ginzberg to Vonnegut.
April 24, 2012 at 11:02AM ESTWould that be the worst Mad Men ever, and that is why I am not an author :-)
Kimberly I like how the shots of Michael when he was talking about his life wasn't focused on his actual body but rather his reflection. Showed how disconnected he is from himself.
April 24, 2012 at 8:38PM ESTGreg Grant
April 23, 2012 at 2:41AM EST Reply to CommentThat was the best Twin Peaks episode I've ever seen.
Dezbot All it needed was a dwarf talking backwards.
April 23, 2012 at 10:43AM ESTGrandpa Gene Well, they have used Ray Wise and Madchen Amick in recent episodes. Maybe Cooper's son is 'FBI Special Agent Dale'!
April 23, 2012 at 1:16PM ESTcgeye Naw -- that's Alice Cooper's kid....
April 23, 2012 at 6:09PM ESTchatnoirrrr I thought the same thing! Surprised to see the episode wasn't directed by David Lynch.
April 24, 2012 at 12:17AM ESTAndrew
April 23, 2012 at 2:44AM EST Reply to CommentThanks for staying up late to post these, Alan - I watched the episode late on TiVo (East Coast) and stayed up a little extra for your post. Seriously.
Personally, I found it to be an exhilarating episode, though also feel the need to watch it again to really organize my thoughts/sentiments. I think that's a compliment to all involved.
Not much to add to your write-up, though I do think it's worth noting the nice parallelism in the set-ups of Roger/Jane, laying on the carpet, shot from above, discovering the truth about their relationship toward the end of their "trip," and Don/Megan at the end of theirs, also shot from above, laying on the carpet ... but incapable of acknowledging the truth.
This episode also brought into high relief for me how bloated the show sometimes feels with Lane's plotlines. Re-watched a few Season 1 episodes today, and after tonight's episode realize that I'm much happier when the core characters/issues from the early days (including Cooper) are front and center.
leahblizz WOW, nice job pointing out the parallels in Roger and Don's scenes with their wives! That makes me feel even more like Don and Megan's relationship is doomed.
April 23, 2012 at 3:27AM ESTA I'm not sure about that kind of direct internal referencing - circularity or parallelism eventually can act as shortcuts to profundity. Seeing how Don & Megan tear around the apartment & don't have sex to resolve their problems works because it's a culmination of other behavior of theirs we've seen in the premiere, two weeks ago, etc. But to physically compare Don & Megan to Roger & Jane is metaphoric (and unnecessary at that, since we've been able to watch the similarities & differences between Roger & Don for years, in much more probable vehicles like dialogue & scenes at work, etc.).
April 23, 2012 at 9:37PM ESTA Faux profundity, that is.
April 24, 2012 at 5:46PM ESTBeth
April 23, 2012 at 2:46AM EST Reply to CommentRegarding Don being a monster, I read that as part of their game. I thought that's what Megan meant by "Every time we fight, it diminishes this. "
dan.cook
April 23, 2012 at 2:51AM EST Reply to CommentLoved the episode. If Roger's acid trip doesn't earn Slattery a "Best Supporting Actor" nom, then there's no justice in awards shows.
Wait, what? We already knew that? Damn.
Lazy Iggy
April 23, 2012 at 2:53AM EST Reply to CommentWhen Megan is yelling at Don "Take off your dress! Yes, Master!" with her arms folded, she looks just like the mannequin in the promo poster.
Guest "I Dream of Jeannie" reference
April 23, 2012 at 7:32AM ESTbfish It made me think of "I Dream of Jeanie", especially the "Yes, Master" part. Was IDOJ on TV in 1966?
April 23, 2012 at 7:50AM ESTWendi Yes
April 23, 2012 at 8:04AM ESTMary That is funny because I thought Jane was actually dressed like I dream of Jeanie
April 24, 2012 at 11:06AM ESTAnn Yes, there was a lot of I dream of Jeannie in this one.
April 29, 2012 at 11:52AM ESTCraig
April 23, 2012 at 2:53AM EST Reply to CommentAlan, Thanks for staying up to do these every week. It's always hard to get this show out of my head after a new episode. But especially with the increasingly funky ones we've been getting this season, I find it hard to get to sleep until I've read a well-reasoned analysis. Your recaps provide a weird sense of closure.
While I liked the episode a lot, the LSD thing came from nowhere. Jane's "You agreed to drop LSD with us...remember?" felt like the way a sitcom might introduce a forced plotline; there's been no prior hint that Jane is interested in drug culture (or seeing a shrink, that I can recall). I guess you could argue that this was meant to make the audience empathise with the way Roger is coasting through this marriage without paying attention to his wife, but to me it just felt lazy. That being said, the payoff was of course phenomenal.
I also sort of wish the show wouldn't play games with chronology unless there's REALLY a strong reason to do so. I watch MAD MEN to enjoy the characters, and to follow their progression from minute to minute, season to season. Seeing Don in the phone booth early on sort of ruined the later Don-Megan argument for me, because instead of focusing on the character nuances, I was preoccupied with "Crap! Something awful is gonna happen! Something awful is gonna happen!" It seems like Weiner really wants us to constantly be fearing the worst this season, and it's getting a tiny bit distracting. At the same time, I'm really intrigued to see where it's going.
miss kim The phone booth scene also highlights how disconnected Peggy and Don are right now, so far removed from the Peggy and Don of "The Suitcase."
April 23, 2012 at 9:43AM ESTDC I suppose we get a very slight hint at Jane's new direction at the very close of season 3, when in the aftermath of the JFK assasination, Roger is on the phone, trying to talk her down from a variety of conspiracy theories. The seeds of marital discord were planted in the JFK episode, and the form it seems to have taken is her interest in an alternative intellectual sphere at a remove from Roger's conventional executive lifestyle. Speculating about the number of shooters in Dallas in Nov. 1963 is one form that this takes; hanging with Upper West Side psychoanalysts is perhaps another.
April 23, 2012 at 9:58AM ESTMBG The 1966 Wikipedia calendar -- which the show has followed in recent episodes with Speck, UT shooter, etc. -- has a Timothy Leary reference on Sept. 19, and this episode was in September. So the acid was dropped right on time.
April 23, 2012 at 10:04AM ESThttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1966
DC Sorry to overpost, but another point here is interesting: Weiner's take on the late 1960s is in some ways even darker than some of the conventional cultural imaginary surrounding it. The late 1960s is often presented in terms of its public catastrophes: the assassinations, the Watts uprisings, the Chicago DNC convention, etc. But this season is reminding us that in NYC, the late 1960s would often be experienced as a claustrophobic encroachment of crime and social decay, experienced at the most visceral personal level. We seem to be seeing Don Draper through the backwards historical gaze of Travis Bickle.
April 23, 2012 at 10:06AM ESTJerseyRudy That is a great post by DC about the connection between the JFK assasination and the Jane that we see in this episode. What we now call the 1960s "counterculture" arose in large part from the distrust in authority stemming from the murder of JFK.
April 23, 2012 at 4:26PM ESTRemember that it was the JFK assasination (and Lee Harvey Oswald's murder a few days later) that was the catalyst for Betty deciding to leave Don and marry Henry. So much of what has happened since then on the show can be traced back to that decision, just as so much that happened in the United States in the mid-late 60s can be traced back to the JFK assasination.
cgeye And, not to overly link real life to fiction, but a prominent May/December couple to trip was Dyan Cannon and Cary Grant. Before the summer of love and covert hijinx, doctors used LSD therapeutically, as they are attempting to do, today, under informed consent and strict controls.
April 23, 2012 at 6:48PM ESTDaniel
April 23, 2012 at 2:54AM EST Reply to CommentNot quite sure Roger would half to halve his fortune a second time in his divorce from Jane. After all- she did admit to cheating on him (even if it was just a kiss), which should give Roger (or his attorney) the ability to play hardball with her, no?
Lazy Iggy Well, seeing how the divorce is mutual, Roger and Jane (and their attorneys) could possibly collude to meet the necessary grounds for divorce.
April 23, 2012 at 3:04AM ESTritz That scene is why we have pre-nups now.
April 23, 2012 at 9:42AM ESTJinjee Admitting to having kissed someone once and "stopped it" does not make Jane vulnerable to a round of hardball from Roger Sterling no matter who's paying the lawyers.
April 23, 2012 at 11:13AM ESTLJA Plus, they've also only been married a couple of years, and there are no children. How much money did he make while he was married to her? Not very much. I don't think he's halving his fortune at all.
April 23, 2012 at 11:25AM EST- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
Next 481 Comments