Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: 'Mad Men' - 'Far Away Places': The HoJo code

Peggy, Roger and Don take three very different trips

<p>The passage of time was a major issue for Don and everyone else on this episode of "Mad Men."</p>

The passage of time was a major issue for Don and everyone else on this episode of "Mad Men."

Credit: AMC

Are you a fan of Mad Men?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

A review of tonight's "Mad Men" coming up just as soon as I buy you a backscratcher...

"Every time we fight, it just diminishes this." -Megan

Only one of the three stories in "Far Away Places" features characters who have taken LSD, and yet the entire episode feels structured like an acid trip. It keeps cycling back and forth through the events of the same day to show it from the perspectives of Peggy, Roger and Don, but that's a pretty familiar narrative trick in our post-"Pulp Fiction" world. What makes the episode feel so trippy is the way that time feels so fluid even within the context of each story.

Obviously, Roger loses all track of time while under the influence of the acid, but the time edits in the Peggy and Don stories feel nearly as elliptical. Time is clearly passing as Peggy goes through a lousy day at work, or as Don panics in the aftermath of a fight with Megan, but that time feels like it's collapsing and expanding at random. Peggy lies down on Don's couch in the day and is immediately greeted by darkness; Don's search through the Howard Johnson's for Megan simultaneously feels like it's going on forever and for two minutes. (When the cop asks Don exactly how long Megan's been missing, it takes him a moment to remember.) One second, Don is driving in his car, miserable and alone in the present; the next, he's back in that idyllic moment last fall at the end of his "Tomorrowland" vacation with Megan and the kids.

A few episodes ago, Raymond from Heinz and Megan bantered back and forth about the title of The Rolling Stones' "Time Is On My Side," and this was an episode where it felt like time was on its side — and upside down, and backwards and forwards all at once.

The non-linear nature of the episode suggests that we're seeing versions of the same story, over and over, just unstuck in time. Peggy is trying to become the Don of 1960, only it's not working out so well for her because a woman can't get away with the work and home life that Don Draper led back in the day. Don has become the Roger of 1963, only the dissolution of his marriage seems to be going faster and uglier because Don is more volatile than the easy-going, charming Roger.

And Roger? Roger's at the end of this particular story. Peggy and Don's relationships are in trouble, but they haven't faced that truth yet. They're still playing with what's true and false, what's possibly true, necessarily true, etc. Roger, though, has taken LSD, and rather than some clichéd cartoon about the middle-aged square having a bad trip(*), we see the drug accomplish exactly what its users intended: it shows them the clear, unvarnished truth of their lives. And the sad but obvious truth is that even if Roger loved Jane once — which he insists he did, in a beautiful line reading from John Slattery — he doesn't anymore. And she doesn't love him, and they shouldn't be together. And even though Roger's supposed to be the man who, like Brian Wilson in the Beach Boys song playing during the acid trip, just wasn't made for these times, he reacts to the trip and its revelations not with anger, confusion or regret, but peace. He hasn't been happy — we've seen that for a good long while now — and even though it's going to halve his fortune for a second time, he's okay with letting go of this depressing lie.

(*) I did love the few baroque details we got from Roger's perspective, particularly the bottle of Stoli playing thunderous Russian music whenever the cap was removed. I feel like that's going to be a selling point in the next round of those ads where Michael Imperioli asks what your tequila can do for you.

Peggy spends part of the episode under the influence of a less potent drug, but it doesn't tell her much of anything about herself, save that she's amenable to giving a hand job to a total stranger in a darkened theater if the mood is right. Don has left her stranded all season — a situation that only Peggy and Bert Cooper seem to recognize — and forced to essentially do Don's job for him, she responds by acting very much like Don in the Heinz meeting. We've already seen that she can do a Draper-style pitch, dating all the way back to the Popsicle account in season two, but here we got not only the Draper pitch, but the classic Draper guilt trip that follows whenever the client acts too hesitant. But Don Draper can pull that off, where all it does is raise the hackles of the old-fashioned, paternalistic Raymond. So she takes another page out of the vintage Draper playbook with a mid-day movie, which turns into an anonymous sexual encounter, before she's finally shocked back into reality by hearing the tragic origin story of Michael Ginsberg.

Michael's a character unstuck in time as well, trapped in memories of his past that he's tried to erase by wrapping them in a science-fiction story about refugees from Mars. Just as the guests at Roger and Jane's party talk about whether the truth is the same on different planets, we know that Michael's truth is the same no matter where you are in time and space, and it sucks, and it no doubt plays a huge role in his behavioral difficulties. But there's a glimmer of hope, perhaps, in the exchange he has with Peggy, where she asks (playing along with the Mars story) if there are others like him, and he says, sadly, "I haven't been able to find any." Peggy's history isn't tragic on such a grand scale, but she's more like Michael than he realizes, and maybe they can connect, either as colleagues or as more whenever Peggy recognizes that she and Abe are done as anything but sex buddies.

During the Heinz pitch, Peggy manages to suck Raymond back into the past for a time, but Raymond rejects the concept under the mistaken belief that young people don't have the same affinity for the past that his generation does. Peggy argues that they do, and maybe with Don there, she could have convinced him; on her own, it's a disaster that gets her booted from the account. But when Don tries to take Megan on a time trip with the orange sherbet, it's his own nostalgia he's focused on, and not any experience of hers, and it's the breaking point in what started out as an uncomfortable day for them and ends as a very ugly one.

They start playing out every old argument they've ever had, and then Megan says, without realizing what she's saying, "Why don't you call your mother?" And then Don's tumbling even further into the past, back to being little Dick Whitman, whore-son, growing up in a home with a drunk and a woman who resented him, and Megan's words have stung him as badly as any said to him over the course of the series, and the only response Don is capable of is the trick the hobo taught him: to run away as quickly as possible. And by the time he recognizes that this kind of behavior won't stand anymore and runs back, Megan's vanished from the Howard Johnson's, leaving only her sunglasses as a clue to fill him with worry, and anxiety and — when Don returns to the apartment to find her alive and well and not answering his panicked calls — anger. And suddenly we're unstuck in time yet again, cycling in between the angry but consensual sex play of the season premiere and the horror movie nightmare of the Richard Speck episode. This isn't a dream, though. This is Don Draper, awake and (mostly) functional chasing his wife through their apartment like he's the villain in a slasher movie.

This is far more unnerving than anything we see during Roger's acid trip. This is real. This is happening. This is our hero (more or less) and for a few moments, he is a monster.

Megan forgives him, for now, when she sees the pain and fear in his eyes. But after last week suggested that Don might have finally found some contentment in his marriage, here we see the truth — not the possibly true, not the necessarily true, but the true — and it's that this marriage is built on a wobbly foundation, that the fights are going to keep coming and keep getting worse, and that Don is letting his work life atrophy as badly as Roger did during his own mid-life crisis marriage.

We end with another blast from the past, as Bert Cooper reminds us he's not there just for name value and an open checkbook. He confronts Don with the truth of what's going on in that place, and Don looks backwards and forwards, not sure if any of what he thought was real actually is. Don thought he had his present, his future and even his past figured out, and maybe none of that's true.

I came to the end of "Far Away Places" not instantly sure how I felt about it — or, in some ways, what it was about. (And with an episode this idiosyncratic, I imagine I may be way off the mark on a whole lot of it.) But the more I've thought about it, and written about it over these last few hours, the more impressed I am with it. It seems such an obvious thing for the show to do an LSD episode at this point of the calendar, and yet they pulled it off in a way I never would have expected, with an episode that gave the feel of dropping acid even when everyone on camera was stone sober. Matt Weiner, co-writer Semi Chellas, director Scott Hornbacher and the actors combined to give us some of the most memorable moments the show has ever done involving Peggy (the explosion at the end of the Heinz pitch), Roger (the sad conversation while lying on the rug at the end of the acid trip) and Don (the chase through the apartment).

This season feels more formally experimental than the previous ones, with the nightmare atmosphere of the Richard Speck episode, the unexpected mix of comedy and violence in last week's boxing match, and now... this. At 1:41 a.m. in the morning after it aired, I'm still not sure I understood 100% of it. But I know I liked it. A lot.

Some other thoughts:

* This week's headline comes courtesy of my friend (and Chicago Tribune business columnist) Phil Rosenthal. The runner-up headline, by the way,  came courtesy of Fienberg: "Two For the Road," the title of the great 1967 film with Audrey Hepburn and Albert Finney about the gradual crumbling dissolution of a marriage that was once idyllic, also told out-of-sequence. 

* Credit to those of you who, after the Richard Speck episode aired, suggested that Michael's discomfort with the crime scene photos came because he was the son of a Holocaust survivor. I dismissed the idea, figuring that he was too old (at least 25 in 1966) for him to have been born in America and have the accent that he has. But given the truth of things, I could see a five-year-old Michael shedding any trace of what he learned in the camp, or in the Swedish orphanage, and building an accent and a personality out of what he was exposed to in New York.

* It's funny: as I watched the HoJo's scenes, I became convinced it was the same set, slightly redressed, they had used for the "Tomorrowland" scene where the kids spill the milkshake and Megan's okay with it. Then I cued up that scene on Netflix, and the two don't look remotely alike.

* For most of this season, each episode has opened with an extremely long opening act before the first ad break (last week's was close to 20 minutes, I think), followed by much shorter acts after that.  I don't know if there's now a set formula for how long the first act should run, but the structure of the episode made it feel like the commercial should have come sooner, either right after we saw Peggy waiting alone in her apartment for Abe, or else after the Don/Roger scene established the time-loop structure of the episode.

* I've resisted the idea that Jane was Jewish, despite the mounting evidence — her name, Danny Strong playing her cousin, Harry mocking Danny by saying "You're such a Jew!" — because it seemed like the show would have made a much bigger deal out of this circa 1962/63. In what may be her final appearance, we got one last piece of evidence I couldn't ignore, with the bit about Jane speaking Yiddish while quoting her father. Oh, well. I still think that should've been dealt with back in season 2 or 3.

* Because I've only ever watched "Justified" — a show with a reputation for having terrible-looking green screen work whenever a scene involves characters talking while driving — on unfinished DVD screeners, I can't speak to whether the Don/Megan scenes looked any worse than what "Justified" does. That says, they didn't look any worse than many actual green screen driving scenes of the mid-'60s, and I'll let it go for that reason.

* Great to see Bess Armstrong (Patty Chase from "My So-Called Life," among many other roles) as Jane's LSD-dropping shrink.

* My father's half of the family is from Montreal, and we'd drive up there a couple of times a year when I was a kid. Same route every time, and every time we'd make one last stop for food, bathrooms, etc., at the McDonald's in Plattsburgh. Never noticed the Howard Johnson's in town. Apparently, it's closed. I'd feel sad, but no one in my family has much of a taste for orange sherbet.

What did everybody else think?

Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
Next 481 Comments
  • Default-avatar

    Cade

    So have you just given up all pretenses of waiting until Monday mornings to do these? (I'm not complaining).

    April 23, 2012 at 1:55AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Hudders 1.41am *is* Monday morning.

      April 23, 2012 at 6:02PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    James

    Pretty sure the HoJo diner was the same as the diner in Pulp Fiction(non-linear story telling connect!). It's somewhere in the Valley.

    April 23, 2012 at 1:56AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Madmen_icon_talkback_profile

      LJA Torrance.

      April 23, 2012 at 2:00AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      KC Nope. The diner in this episode was Rod's Grill in Arcadia, CA. Also where they filmed recent scenes for "Luck."

      April 23, 2012 at 2:43AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Geoff It definately was the same diner from Pulp Fiction. And it was planned, on Weiner's behalf. That's what makes the writing of this episode incredibly great - it was about three stories woven into one, just like Tarantino's movie - it was not a coincidence.

      Brilliant episode.

      April 23, 2012 at 5:34AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Kevin The diner in Pulp Fiction was demolished in the mid 90's.

      April 23, 2012 at 6:44AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      PF Thought I'd read that the diner shown in Tomorrowland is the same one from Pulp Fiction...

      April 23, 2012 at 6:54AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Herb P The Hawthorne Grill was the filming site for "Pulp Fiction" and it was demolished some time ago. Some things from the restaurant were moved to Pann's Restaurant in the Crenshaw neighborhood.

      April 23, 2012 at 8:16AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Huell Goodman Another excellent tagline, Alan.

      Interesting to see HoJo as something of a classy upscale novelty restaurant. Don and Meagan seemed so excited to be there (well, at first). It definitely clashes with my childhood memories of Hojo as a chain of shady dives during it's twilight years. In fact, I'm pretty sure as a child I saw Don Draper sleeping in a HoJo restaurant in New Jersey - except he was 35 years older, drooling and wearing a ripped cardigan covered in hashbrown crumbs.

      Thinking back, there was always a certain nostalgia surrounding Howard Johnson's that I never quite understood. Actually, for a while I thought the place was owned by the the old Mets third basemen (it was even orange!).

      I do recall a sadness in NYC when the one in Times Square finally closed in the late 90s (??).

      April 23, 2012 at 8:28AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      James Yup, after further research, it wasn't the Pulp Fiction diner...but damn, sure as hell looked like it.

      April 23, 2012 at 1:56PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      potzer37 The diner from "Tomorrowland" is actually Mel's Diner on Sunset Blvd. in W. Hollywood.

      April 23, 2012 at 3:30PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Sharmayne Sharp observation by Megan that HoJo's aren't a destination but are places you eat/stay at when you're on your way elsewhere. (Maybe that's a metaphor for their marriage.) One of my favorite HoJo's was located at an airport hotel. I loved the fried clams.

      April 23, 2012 at 3:50PM EST
    • Madmen_icon_talkback_profile

      LJA The Tomorrowland diner was actually Bob's Big Boy Broiler in Downey. http://la.curbed.com/archives/2012/03/a_guide_to_mad_men_filming_locations_in_los_angeles_1.php#pointmap

      April 23, 2012 at 3:57PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Michael R Amazing how some people can be so sure about something that's totally untrue..maybe think before you speak?

      April 23, 2012 at 5:15PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Mr Belvedere Wow! How can so many people be so sure about so many locations? What transpired above is amazing...

      April 23, 2012 at 8:50PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Ilyrio

    There you are, immature man-baby Don! I've missed you so much!

    April 23, 2012 at 1:58AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Alanna This episode definitely reminded me of Jon Hamm's surprise that many fans actually consider Don Draper to be a "good guy".

      April 23, 2012 at 9:52AM EST
    • Spaearth_talkback_profile

      rockknj I always thought of Don as an empty man, not bad or good but sometimes doing good and sometimes doing bad just because circumstances led that way.

      April 25, 2012 at 12:19AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      anon Hes rotten to the core and im looking forward to his inevitable killing spree that has been foreshadowed all series long

      June 24, 2012 at 11:04PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Ed

    I loved the shot of the darkness creeping over Peggy; it was a nice reversal from the pilot episode of the light creeping over Don as he takes his nap.

    April 23, 2012 at 1:59AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Ilyrio Great catch.

      April 23, 2012 at 2:05AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    John G

    I loved the time loop. Interesting episode. I didn't realize the "Peggy is 1960 Don, and Don is 1963 Roger" angle till now.

    April 23, 2012 at 1:59AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Brian

    I'd like to think that this episode will give Don a chance to see that the path he has been following in the months after the marriage will fail, but that he has a chance to fix it. He's now heard from Megan that she takes her work seriously and doesn't want to keep leaving it at his whim, and from Cooper that other people are now noticing the lack of his presence at work. Having both of these happen at the same time may be able to snap him out of whatever stupor he has been in and fix things.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:00AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Dave I I don't know if Don & Megan are meant to work. I think, similar to Roger and Jane in a strange way, Don wanted on some level Megan however maybe that is not what he really desire, or simply maybe she is not what he needs. They want it to work, and it is possible that they could make it work, I am simply unsure if they are entirely compatible. I am unsure if Don is done evolving for that matter. Looking at Megan, I think she wants the illusion. She loves Don, yet does not understand him.

      I think it could go either way. In Don's fever-dream episode, I found it interesting that Don succumbed to his sex addiction in his dream, yet also viewed Megan as his salvation complete with the majestic halo of light as he woke up and saw her there. I also thought it poignant that after their argument in last night's episode, they did NOT have sex (which seems almost more compulsory with Don than necessarily something done out of love) and had a conversation. For Don, that is both unexpected and perhaps meaningful for somebody who uses sex the way an alcoholic uses the bottle. However, as Megan said, every fight diminishes what they have. I am not sure that is true as an absolute (I'm married and arguments will happen). If we take a look at what they are fighting about, why, and how, there seems to be a fundamental lack of understanding about the other. Maybe Megan was trying to hurt Don with the comment about his mom, maybe she just does not understand him enough to pull back. Which is worse? Don regressed a bit in his maturation yet turned the car around after ditching his wife and showed she really means a lot to him. Is that enough? Is he so desperate for Megan or for what their marriage represents, as for what their failed marriage might mean? How much can (or should) Don change, and will it be soon enough or even a change that is closer or further from what Megan thought she married when she said yes?

      Overall, I am curious to see what corrective actions Don takes, both personally, with his marriage, and at work.

      -Cheers

      April 23, 2012 at 10:12AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Ilyrio

    Please please please let the Bert Cooper scene be a lead-in to him taking a more active role in the plot.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:03AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Lazy Iggy Totally agree. I also loved that scene because it is a reminder that Bert sees more than he is seen.

      April 23, 2012 at 2:07AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      kelevra The not-so-subtle reminder that Bert's face on the money in Roger's pocket coupled with the brilliance of that one liner - 'this *is* my business' - before he walks out on Don makes me believe that we're going to see a lot more of Mr Cooper before the season's up...

      April 23, 2012 at 9:09AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      hampshi Except for last season, when they literally emasculated him, Coop's purpose seems to be there to come in at least once a season to smack Don upside the head.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:20AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Sara I literally applauded when Bert said, "This IS my business." I thought the delivery had the perfect balance of despair and honesty.

      April 23, 2012 at 11:02AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      virginia Indeed! I've loved seeing 3 of the older guys -- Lane, Roger, and Bert -- somehow able to navigate the 60s better than the younger set. A subtle and effective reminder of the wisdom that comes with age.

      April 23, 2012 at 1:27PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Sharmayne The Bert scene was worth the whole hour. I was struck by the aftermath with Don alone in the conference room watching integral members of his professional and personal life pass by.

      April 23, 2012 at 3:53PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Tay-ed Yes, me too... Wonder if any meaning to Peggy walking in one direction and the others walking the other way?

      May 29, 2012 at 10:55PM EST
  • Icon_talkback_profile

    carey_adams

    How much fun would it be to trip with Roger?

    Phenomenal episode. It kind of came out of nowhere, and I hope they continue to mess with our expectations a little bit this season.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:04AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Lazy Iggy

    This episode left me feeling very disoriented...not just the various timelines, but also what I think I know and expect from these characters.

    I am a bit worried about Peggy...is Don like downward spiral in her cards? Will she be punching male partners for gratification?

    April 23, 2012 at 2:05AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Michael G.

    I think I could watch Don Draper kick in doors all day long. I hope we get a third before the end of the series.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:05AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Bonnie memories of Rhett Butler in GWTW!.............

      April 24, 2012 at 10:44AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Karen

    The interior at HoJo's was a vintage coffee shop in Arcadia called Rod's Grill. I was in there late last year and was surprised to see the turquoise booths. I wonder if the show reupholstered them for this episode.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:05AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      DC I was wondering where on earth they would find a HoJo in such mint condition.

      The HoJo was also a good site for highlighting the generation (and perhaps class) difference between Don and Megan. Don takes it as axiomatic that Megan would love the Hojo -- as well he might: for all Don's sophistication, he also deeply sympathizes with the mass culture kitsch of mid-century America, as much of it is about wiping the slate clean. His generation wanted to forget about the war(s), and begin again on a sparkling new Formica table.

      But for Megan, who is not only younger but grew up in Montreal, there's the possibility that the HoJo would be hopelessly middlebrow, with the Day-Glo sherbert (which I loved as a kid, by the way) striking her as tacky and unsubtle.

      I recognize that the HoJo was also the idealized site of the Tomorrowland for Don, and that he hoped that they would both look at it that way. But that episode was largely seen through Don's eyes, and all he could see was the Hojo as the site of his own happiness: perhaps Megan, at the time, saw the HoJo as little more than a practical place to take the kids for milkshakes.

      Recall Don's distaste for antiquing, revealed at the breakfast nook in some episode from season 3.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:38AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Jackie Childs So, in other words: Don went to HoJo to forget Tojo, but instead he lost his Mojo?

      April 23, 2012 at 10:13AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DC Ha! Just, so, Jackie. Nicely done.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:24AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Mimsy Touché, Jackie!

      April 23, 2012 at 10:34AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ab Don's war was Korea...

      April 23, 2012 at 11:05AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      J-Mart I don't buy that Megan is culturally snobbish toward the HoJo; if so, why would she slurp up distasteful orange sherbet like a hungry cow, only to spit it out in a paper napkin? No, she was showing Don that she was not a puppet and he can't make her like his life. It was a statement of equality, which he rejected by driving off.

      April 23, 2012 at 2:29PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Miriam

    Two for the Road is not about the dissolution of a marriage. It ends with a reconcilation and bemused, slighly angry, acceptance.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:05AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall But they make things work in the past, too, and then things get bad again. Admittedly, it's been years since I watched it, but my recollection is that it's a movie about why these two are wrong for each other, keep being drawn back together, but are ultimately doomed.

      April 23, 2012 at 2:11AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ritz Not doomed. They stay together. Brilliant, brilliant, film.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:21AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      virginia I agree that Audrey and Albert don't end up doomed in Two for the Road. They each have affairs after a period of unhappiness and drifting apart but her affair in particular, with a dashing European, brings them both round to one another. One of my favorite films back in the day -- have seen it many, many times. Hepburn was never more beautiful. And Finney was outstanding in the role.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:03AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Raerae Never seen Two For The Road, but the fact that Don and Megan end up on the carpet, on their backs, and talking to eachother but looking off into the distance - well, it was exactly like Jane and Roger's final chitchat earlier in the episode. Is it over for Don and Megan but no one wants to say it?

      April 23, 2012 at 10:49AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Rene

    Completely agree about not knowing what to think about the episode. All I know is I literally exclaimed during the episode "This Is Trippy!" So I think the writers got the reaction they wanted out of me. I'm also interested in seeing what everyone thought about the very end where Peggy walked one way and then the other three copywriters walked past her in the opposite direction. I saw it as Peggy losing her fire for this job, but I could be completely wrong. I may need to re-watch this episode.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:06AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Kimberly Interesting observation to think about. I don't think Peggy's "losing her fire" though. I agree with Mr. Sepinwall that she does a good job because she's basically taking over for Don, and she just decided to disagree with the client as Don has done. It's just that she's seen as "a little girl", as Cooper called her, and the Heinz guy compared her to his daughter, so she had less of an impact as, say, Don would have made.

      I have no clue how to interpret her walking against everyone else though... I am intrigued to read others' thoughts.

      April 23, 2012 at 2:50AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Adam Kimberly, I thought "the little girl" Coop was referring to was Megan.

      April 23, 2012 at 3:21AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JerseyRudy I thought Cooper was referring to Peggy. He was chastising Don for turning over the work to Peggy. No doubt the same pitch made by Don instead of Peggy to the Heinz exec would have worked; the Heinz exec would have been persuaded by the same words coming out of Don's mouth.

      April 23, 2012 at 6:20AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ritz God, I felt bad for Peggy in that presentation!

      April 23, 2012 at 9:23AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Emma Cooper did mean Peggy...I was taken aback by his comment. I thought Peggy would have earned more respect by this point, even from an oldtimer like Bert. I guess however much headway Peggy's made at the firm, a reminder that it's still a boy's club, and will be for many years to come.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:38AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      hampshi Peggy has always been going back and forth between insecurity and over-confidence at work. There are bona-fide flashes in the pan, but she's never been as good at "the pitch" like Don or even Ginsburg is and I think she knows it. I think that's why she blew up at Raymond. Her Heinz campaign is really good, and Raymond's ideas are bad. But since she's a woman, she can't sell her best work, even while imitating the men she works with.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:39AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      TMB Is it possible Cooper could have been referring to both Peggy and Megan and kept it intentionally ambiguous?

      April 23, 2012 at 11:13AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Mary The thing I thought when I saw Peggy going one way and the younger three going the other way was the great age divide, Peggy still trying to fit into Don's shoes but the others grasping for the change from photography taking over drawing to Megan knowing all things young and Ginsburg wanting to fit into a world that is not Mars. I also thought of the opposite saying of when a door opens another one closes when Roger announces It's a beautiful Day. Why did I get the feeling it was opening for Roger and closing for Don.

      April 23, 2012 at 1:36PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      T Sill I don't think anybody would refer to Megan as a "little girl." And, Peggy has been running Don's department. Even the ancient Bert Cooper wouldn't think of Megan as a "little girl." And, Peggy gives off a "little girl" vibe physically...right down to that goofy little laugh she has when she's drinking or getting high...

      April 23, 2012 at 4:27PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Sharmayne Anyone notice how much more drinking Peggy is doing on the job?

      April 23, 2012 at 11:14PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Bonnie My thought as Peggy walked past the conference room the opposite way from the 3 male copywriters was that it represented Peggy's struggle against the tide to succeed in a "man's world" at SCD. She asked Dawn last week if she was acting too much like a man, then punches Gabe in bed when she is supposed to act like a woman, then succumbs as a woman to a stranger in a movie theater, tries to absorb Don's persona on his couch and finally walks in the opposite direction from the others in front of Don after the "little girl" comment. This show is SO much fun to analyze!

      April 24, 2012 at 11:06AM EST
    • Spaearth_talkback_profile

      rockknj I took it as Coop clearly restating what the Heinz man called Peggy i.e. the "little girl", when the Heinz man demanded Peggy be removed from the project. In no way did I see Coop as personally calling Peggy a little girl.

      April 25, 2012 at 12:33AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      chloe.cyteval I thought this scene was more about Don. He is in the conference room, alone, and he sees the others walking by because he has excluded himself from the SCDP world and now he realizes it. I am not sure this is about Peggy, I might be wrong, but I remember Megan walks by with the guys, isn't she? in that case it can't be about Peggy being a woman.
      a few episodes ago, when she invited Dawn at her place, she said she didn't want to act like a man, but in this episode she did act exactly as one and it didn't work out. I think she is going to realize that and we are going to see a whole new Peggy from now on (I hope so!)

      April 25, 2012 at 3:39AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    irieagogo

    This was a really weird episode. Ifelt creepy scared during the Don chases Megan around the house scene. I thought something really terrible was going to happen to her. Don doesn't realize he cannot treat her the same ways he did Betty. She argues back, wants more respect and demands it. I really won't be able to handle it if they go into a domestic abuse cycle. Him weeping on his knees was so typical of the begging for forgiveness phase, then the nothing-is- wrong-with-us walk through the office and the smiles of the hearts and flowers making up phase felt so ominous.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:07AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      evie Agree on all accounts. It was a horrible, violent scene and I hope they will not let Don go there again.

      Also, I like Megan and the way she expects more from Don and stands up to him. However, twice now she's said horrible things to Don about his past -- once, during the birthday episode she said, "Nobody loves Dick Whitman," and then tonight the truly over-the-line remark about his mother. I don't think she said it without thinking, as Alan does. She said it because she wanted to lash out. There are just some things you don't say to people you love, no matter how angry you are.

      April 23, 2012 at 5:38AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Gotham Goddess I honestly thought two times during that scene he was going to hit her: when she started hitting him because he grabbed her and when he finally grabbed her after chasing her. I found the ending so disturbing. Don has NEVER felt this desperate before where he actually has to physically control someone! He could always do it mentally- with manipulation and intellect. This shows me how out of control he feels in this love. Dick/Don being in love for the first time is scary.

      April 23, 2012 at 8:32AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      kElevrA I got the feeling this was purposefully done to resemble the tumultuous experience of an acid trip. From the bright lights of the diner to the darker, more ominous lighting when Megan is lost to Don. Their apartment was also dimly lit when things spiralled so rapidly out of control and then finally back to the brightly lit office where Megan forgives him with a tearful nod. The cinematography in this episode was excellent to say the least.

      Didn't know what to make of the very last scene though. Anyone else feel it was reminiscent of the title sequence?

      April 23, 2012 at 9:19AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Kitsy1398 Why do people think Betty was such a doormat? When she was finally confronted with proof of his infidelity, she kicked him out. She showed she was not afraid of him when he seemed ready to hit her and he backed down. And in the end, she left Don and the other way around, against his wishes. Megan has apparently forgiven him for abandoning her in the middle of nowhere and then chasing her around the apartment like a runaway dog. Don never treated Betty that badly, at least not to her face.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:40AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      hampshi Evie, look at Megan's face after she made the mother comment. She realizes her mistake right after it comes out and is immediately apologetic. Everything is too close to the surface with Megan. While Don was unhappy that Betty was frosty and distant, it did keep the cap on Don. In their heated moments, he did push Betty and call her a whore, but he never lost control like this.

      After the fever dream, the idea that Don is capable of real violence towards women makes these physical fights with Megan all the more frightening.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:53AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Kelly I've been sitting on the fence this season, as I did not feel as engaged with the characters, storylines, etc., but this episode changed all that. Mad Men was back to its old brilliance and I find myself mulling over the details the way I used to. Kelevra, great observations about the cinematography resembling an acid trip. Also, as someone who has worked with abused women, the scenes with Don and Megan were very authentic and well done and set the stage for the inevitable decline of their relationship. I was very worried for Megan's character and it added another note of the surreal in that one of their neighbour's didn't call the police given the violence of their encounter. In real life, abused women are most vulnerable when their partners feel abandoned by them. Even though Don was the one who initially abandoned Megan, the fact that she wasn't passively waiting for him to return to the restaurant shook up his sense of reality and led to the extreme rage we saw in the later scenes. Megan's comment about their relationship being "diminished" was very poignant and served to set the dynamic between them as being something destructive. A pattern is being set: they each target one another's vulnerabilities in times of stress. I am very interested to see where the writers will take this.

      April 23, 2012 at 11:12AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Lisa Kelevra, I also thought the final scenes were deliberately echoing the title sequence. Beautifully done.

      April 23, 2012 at 1:35PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Bcolangelo I thought the exact same thing about the last scene: the reflection of the building on the door as Don settles into his seat. Watched it three times to make sure. Glad I wasn't the only one, and may even get to win an argument with my wife on this one. Maybe.

      April 23, 2012 at 6:18PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Stephanie I think this is the beginning of more violoence on Don's part toward the women in his life. Shoving Betty infront of the baby, the dream/fantasy of choking out a lover, chasing Megan around the apartment (what if he had caught her)...it's getting more intense every time. I didn't know who Richard Speck was until I read the Wikipedia article on him. Interesting Bill Curtis interview information there, along with a psychological profile of Speck, including a diagnosis of "madonna-prostitute" syndrome. Shockingly like Don Draper.

      April 27, 2012 at 7:09AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    leahblizz

    So both Peggy and Pete and trying to be "the new Don", and both are failing in their own ways. Very interesting.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:12AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      leahblizz ARE trying to be "the new Don". Ugh.

      April 23, 2012 at 2:13AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      virginia What an interesting observation!

      April 23, 2012 at 1:38PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      T Sill Peggy only fails because she's a woman in 1965, 1966. She has the talent and the drive and the instinct. Pete's failing because he lacks all those things.

      April 23, 2012 at 4:29PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      leahblizz Agreed T Sill. It's not Peggy's fault that she's failing--she's merely failing because of her gender and how people expect her to act because of it. Pete possesses none of the qualities necessary to "become Don".

      April 23, 2012 at 8:10PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      robwein I'd say the larger point here is that while both P's are trying to be the New Don, the show's view is that that is a reprehensible goal. Failure is thus a good thing.

      April 25, 2012 at 4:39PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    BenS

    First, I kept thinking that this was like an episode of Community (Remedial Chaos Theory specifically, and this weeks as well) because of how they played with time and perception of time. Second, I thought that Jane sounded like Tina from "Bob's Burgers" when she and Roger we're laying on the floor.

    I wasn't sure if the scene of Don and Megan and the kids driving back was a flashback (because of the Mickey Mouse hats) or a hallucination.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:13AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Levi Benjamin Totally agree, I've thought this entire season has been like Community, with every episode trying to achieve something thematically, and stylistically, almost evoking a certain movie from the past. This episode was by fart the most Community-like of the bunch.

      As interesting a route they've been taking, I much prefer the old Mad Men that wowed us with the truth of human experience, rather than making sure to provide a weekly homage to pop culture.

      April 23, 2012 at 12:16PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      BenS I didn't mean so much that they were doing homages, but this episode really seemed to be getting at (as really the whole series does) how people view themselves. And because of recent Community eps, I was reminded of them.

      It was also just a really trippy 5 days of television.

      April 23, 2012 at 11:31PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      chloe.cyteval i think playing with the time line is not something Community invented, it is done since (at least) Pulp fiction, maybe it's just the proximity of the two episodes that made everyone do the connection.

      Levi Benjamin: you sound like Roger wanting things to go back the way it was before! (don't take this the wrong way, I'm just kidding). every episodes of mad men have been talking about a specific theme since the very first season. but mostly, every season has a very different construction. that's, from my point of view, the whole point of Mad Men. Nothing is ever going to "go back to normal", everything is evolving, both the story and the structure of the episodes. and that's precisely because the characters can't evolve with their time that they are falling again and again. I am not sure this is an homage to pop culture.

      so far i have NEVER guessed right what was going to happened next on Mad Men, so I wander how the 7th season is going to end!

      April 25, 2012 at 4:00AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    QuentinCold

    Alan,

    Longtime reader, first time poster. Thanks yet again for staying up to post your Mad Men review!

    Every time I think Bert Cooper should be put out to pasture, he surprises me. Whenever he does surface, he usually impresses, as he did tonight. I can't imagine anyone else at SCDP who could have pulled off delivering that message to Don (and be taken seriously). It was a deft and succinct maneuver. Despite his initial protestations, Don knew that Bert was right. I can only hope he brings back his A-game...

    Loved Roger's trip. At first, I really did think he was somehow immune to the acid until he opened the vodka bottle. The Silver Fox is about to be re-released into the wild!

    April 23, 2012 at 2:14AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Adam Released into the wild or finally being with Joan?

      April 23, 2012 at 3:23AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Preston Does Cooper know about Dick Whitman? I seem to remember that he does. In other words Don has to listen to him for reasons beyond just his stature in the company.

      April 23, 2012 at 3:48AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ed newman Coop does know. Pete ratted Don out. Coop's response? "Who Cares?"

      April 23, 2012 at 7:33AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      QuentinCold Cooper hasn't often raised the Dick Whitman issue to hang over Don (like Pete Campbell tried to), but I believe he did reference it obliquely to compel Don to sign the employment contract before Sterling Cooper was acquired by the British agency.

      I agree with the commenter who posted that Cooper sees more than he is see. He appears out of touch and irrelevant, but he is right on the money when he does act, usually at the opportune moment. I would love to have seen him in his prime!

      April 23, 2012 at 8:35AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Kathryn Quentincold - You're right about Cooper using his Dick Whitman knowledge to get Don to sign his contract. He said something like, "Do you agree that I know things about you? So who's really signing this contract anyway?"

      I like how Bert can control a situation with just a few words -- that he's not nearly as unnecessary as it would appear at times.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:18AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DC I just wish that Bert still had an office. He looks so pathetic rattling around in the conference room, his copy of the Wall Street Journal in hand. I also miss the artwork, which I believe Lane once referred to as "remarkable."

      April 23, 2012 at 9:46AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Emma You're right, no one else but Bert could have gotten away with rejecting Don's work and calling him out like that. Don's(John's) reaction and facial expression was perfect. I can't wait to see next week's Don Draper.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:43AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Beverly C Just to clarify: Don was pressured to sign the contract because of the Hilton business, not when PPL acquired Sterling Cooper. The fact that Don did not have a contract is what got Duck Phillips bounced from the company when he tried to bully Don in the initial meeting of the newly formed company. It was Conrad Hilton's lawyers who insisted that all the company's principals be tied to a contract.

      April 23, 2012 at 2:02PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      QuentinCold Beverly C, you are correct!
      http://www.amctv.com/shows/mad-men/episodes/season-3/seven-twenty-three

      April 23, 2012 at 7:24PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    ZacharyTF

    I wonder if Matt Weiner tried to get Denis Leary to play his father? That would have been a trip, pun intended.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:17AM EST Reply to Comment
    • ZacharyTF, Denis Leary is of no relation to Timothy Leary. Also, I don't think that Jane's doctor's husband was actually supposed to be Timothy Leary. He was commenting on Leary's "product" rhetorically.

      April 23, 2012 at 2:44AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ritz That was not intended to be Leary. At the time Dr. Leary was at Harvard doing experiments with graduate students.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:27AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DevdogAZ According to Wikipedia, Leary was fired from Harvard in 1963 and in 1966 he was hosting "turn on" parties at an estate in Poughkeepsie, which is not too far from Manhattan. I think that's too much of a coincidence for Weiner to reference Dr. Leary rhetorically.

      April 23, 2012 at 2:17PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Tandoori Perhaps not, but it's very un-Weiner-like to have his characters directly involved with major historical and cultural figures a la Boardwalk Empire. Seems a little too in-your face for his writing style. Hard to say either way, as I don't think he was ever mentioned by name.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:59PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Dr. Doctor The closed captioning referred to the doctor as "Leary."

      April 24, 2012 at 12:42PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      SV2012 At first I didn't think of the doctor being Timothy Leary, but how interesting if he was! I'll have to watch the scene again. @Tandoori, Mad Men did have Don directly interacting with Conrad Hilton... not a major historical figure I suppose, but a real person who had an impact on society (and celeb culture via his great granddaughters)

      May 11, 2012 at 12:08AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Ed

    Since Roger's being edged out of the business, then out of his marriage, I think the man falling in the opening credits is Roger, who no longer fits in this world, and he's had enough of it.

    (and by "had enough of it," I mean he jumps off a building)

    April 23, 2012 at 2:19AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      leahblizz that's an interesting theory, but I think Roger was glad to get out of his marriage with Jane. He was clearly unhappy with her. Oh, and also, BOTH ROGER AND JOAN ARE SINGLE NOW OMG.

      April 23, 2012 at 3:24AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Che I agree with Leahblizz. Roger doesn't strike me as depressed or despondent enough to kill himself. He's happy to be out of the marriage--"relieved" is the word he used when he and Jane were talking--and even though he's struggling to figure out a role at work, he doesn't seem like he feels threatened to his core the way Pete does.

      April 23, 2012 at 8:31AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DC Roger's not *self-aware* enough to go that route, either. Every time he's confronted with his own shortcomings, he finds a way to deflect them, or blame them on someone else.

      One thing that struck me last week, during the subplot about Lane's failed efforts as an account man, was how good Roger's advice was to Lane: it was the mark of someone who does have a skill set, and who's rather good at it, when push comes to shove.

      Though there's a possibility that that skill set -- knowing how to pace the drinks, knowing how to probe the client for weaknesses -- works less well with the younger clients that SCDP is soon going to be trying to pursue.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:52AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      TSill You know...in 1965, 1966...people who felt marginalized didn't rush to therapy, then head for the nearest open window. Roger was miserable in his desire to stay young, be with younger women and throw his money around. He's quite aware now that the lust for younger, hotter women is pointless. Money only helps to a certain extent. He does actually enjoy the memory of when he was a vital part of the business and, despite what younger viewers might think, Roger is far from too old to contribute to the firm now. He actually CARES about Joan...she has his baby...she's on her own...he tried LSD and, actually, it did open many minds in that generation. So...I feel like Roger's positioned for better things...with Joan.

      April 23, 2012 at 4:32PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Detie AND - Just because he has not sold an account since Lucky Strike doesn't mean he can't. He may wake up on the morning and go to work!!

      April 24, 2012 at 4:12PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      chloe.cyteval I think Roger has fell a few seasons ago, and it is precisely (according to me) because he has accepted the fact that he is no longer an account man, and that he is no longer in love with Jane, that he is happy. so if the opening credits were about him it would be a man crashed down the street ( and quite fine about it!)

      April 25, 2012 at 4:05AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Kimberly

    I thought Megan said, "Every time we fight it just diminishes US."

    April 23, 2012 at 2:21AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      HWah I thought that as well. But I'm likely not helpful to your version as I thought she said in the HoJo to Don "what do you call your mother" rather than "why don't you call your mother". Those lead to very different conclusions, I'm going to have to watch again.

      April 23, 2012 at 3:14AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Kimberly AHA! We were right, Hwah. I have captions on my TV, and I rewatched the episode. She indeed says, "...it diminishes us a little." I think saying "us" makes it a lot more personal and implies that the fighting diminishes them as a couple and both of them as persons.

      April 23, 2012 at 4:06AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ritz I'm not using captions, but I have in the past with other shows, and just be aware, they sometimes make mistakes... not saying that they did, you just don't want to bet the farm on them.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:29AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      swanstep Don't know what the captions say, but Megan definitely says "...diminishes this a little bit." I prefer the slight abstraction of 'this' - Megan's a very articulate, smart cookie and a close aware observer of things, and I buy that she'd say that and be thinking things slightly more abstractly.

      I like Megan a lot. Don physically damaging her would be unforgivable. I'm praying that the show doesn't go there.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:51AM EST
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall I checked with AMC. It's "diminishes this."

      April 23, 2012 at 12:12PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      TSill "...it diminishes THIS" was referring to their marriage...not the act of having rough, make-up sex.

      April 23, 2012 at 4:33PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Kimberly Well I suppose I stand corrected. Mea culpa.

      Still kinda wish she had said "us", not for the sake of being right, but I just felt it made more sense, and, as I said, encompassed more than just their failing marriage.

      Don and Megan's relationship has got to be the weirdest Mad Men marriage. I feel like sometimes they truly think they're happy, like when Don proudly said he'd rather take Megan on the trip. But he's still quite lost, unlike Roger who finally came to the realization of his mid-life crisis and how unhappy he was with Jane.

      And Megan breaking down crying broke my heart. What a transformation her character underwent from just some secretary (remember when Roger didn't even know who she was?) to now this broken woman.

      April 24, 2012 at 8:37PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Luke

    This felt like middle-year Sopranos episodes where Tony would hallucinate or have episode-long dreams. Interesting but it feels like the plot is stalling this season. Character development is there but are the storylines?

    April 23, 2012 at 2:24AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Bobhoff Exactly my feelings. I think people are mistaking great character development - which there has been this season - for great storylines, of which there have been almost none. There's just no true plot or proactive narrative this season. And I get that that's the point, to a extent, I just wish something story-wise was more integral to the theme of the season. Then again, we still have eight episodes left...

      April 23, 2012 at 3:41AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Blake I agree. The New York Times critic wrote before the season that Mad Men has become a soap opera. I can't get that out of my head now, but to be fair, more plot happens on a soap opera.

      April 28, 2012 at 11:40AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Remy

    This was a fantastic episode and great review this time Alan. I know the focus is on the acid trip and the dissolution of marriage(s) but I think this episode was about changing gender relations too (although I think this is always a subtext in the show). Peggy has been struggling with people's reactions to her more "masculine behavior" and growing assertiveness as her career progresses. I couldn't help but think that maybe the Heinz guy would have bought her pitch if she had been a man, since she got a bit aggressive. Megan wants to be treated like a professional/ creative worker and not just the trophy wife and plaything for Don. In some ways, Don doesn't seem to know how to relate to her--Betty was so child-like and he could just issue commands. Megan chafes against this, calling him "my master" in the best sarcastic MM line ever. She represents the new generation of young upstart women who have professional goals and want to be taken seriously.
    And wasn't it obvious from the start that Roger would enjoy tripping the most!?

    April 23, 2012 at 2:37AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Huell Goodman Now that he's discovered LSD, maybe Roger will have a late career shift and become the new start of SDCP's creative team.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:34AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Huell Goodman Also, while sexism played an obvious role in Heinz' response, I think Peggy was in way over her head to think she could pull a Draper and lecture a major client. I don't think anyone else at the firm, regardless of sex, could pull that off. That's one of the reasons why Don is indispensable, and as high as his regard is for Peggy, it was inexcusable for him not to be at that meeting.

      Also, in an uncomfortable way, Mr. Heinz' sexism probably saved SCDP from losing the account. If a male had berated him like that he would have been out the door, but instead the "problem" is easily corrected by replacing the uppity woman with a man.

      Peggy's fall is going to become Ginsberg's big break. Ginsberg is the type of young temperamental genius that Heinz is looking for - someone willing to tell the client what they want.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:06AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Kimberly

    Thank you, Mr. Sepinwall, for not keeping your word about waiting until the morning after to post reviews. I thoroughly enjoy coming to this site straight after watching the episode on TV.

    I really like how, as you've said, this season has been so experimental with their storytelling. I think it fits right into the more radical times of the later 1960s.

    I admit that I'm really sensitive to any kind of violence and hard drug use, so I was particularly on edge tonight. Especially when Don was chasing Megan around the apartment, I felt my heart pounding like no other. It's a side of Don (there I go again accidentally writing "Dong" and having to go back and correct myself...) that we know is there and we've seen creep through at times, but just to see it play out like that is terrifying. Not unlike his fever dream from "Mystery Date".

    And, yeah, I thought about you when Jane mentioned her Yiddish-speaking father. Ho hum.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:40AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      ritz I must say, I was with Alan on the Jane being Jewish thing. I just thought it would've been clearly stated in that era with those people.
      I was NOT with Alan on the Michael Ginzburg thing, and I thought the revelation of that information was pure poetry. Even though it was off-beat and eccentric, finding a way to talk about it that brings all of the horror and sadness and loneliness to life is such a challenge. It was a beautifully acted, beautifully crafted scene, from the writing to the lighting as they say.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:39AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ab Both the Mars tale and the expression "unstuck in time" are pretty much Slaughterhouse-Five.

      April 23, 2012 at 11:14AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Mary Well Ken is a science fiction writer. Maybe in a very Forrest Gump-like scene, Ken will introduce Ginzberg to Vonnegut.

      Would that be the worst Mad Men ever, and that is why I am not an author :-)

      April 24, 2012 at 11:02AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Kimberly I like how the shots of Michael when he was talking about his life wasn't focused on his actual body but rather his reflection. Showed how disconnected he is from himself.

      April 24, 2012 at 8:38PM EST
  • Emo7_talkback_profile

    Greg Grant

    That was the best Twin Peaks episode I've ever seen.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:41AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Dezbot All it needed was a dwarf talking backwards.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:43AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Grandpa Gene Well, they have used Ray Wise and Madchen Amick in recent episodes. Maybe Cooper's son is 'FBI Special Agent Dale'!

      April 23, 2012 at 1:16PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      cgeye Naw -- that's Alice Cooper's kid....

      April 23, 2012 at 6:09PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      chatnoirrrr I thought the same thing! Surprised to see the episode wasn't directed by David Lynch.

      April 24, 2012 at 12:17AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Andrew

    Thanks for staying up late to post these, Alan - I watched the episode late on TiVo (East Coast) and stayed up a little extra for your post. Seriously.

    Personally, I found it to be an exhilarating episode, though also feel the need to watch it again to really organize my thoughts/sentiments. I think that's a compliment to all involved.

    Not much to add to your write-up, though I do think it's worth noting the nice parallelism in the set-ups of Roger/Jane, laying on the carpet, shot from above, discovering the truth about their relationship toward the end of their "trip," and Don/Megan at the end of theirs, also shot from above, laying on the carpet ... but incapable of acknowledging the truth.

    This episode also brought into high relief for me how bloated the show sometimes feels with Lane's plotlines. Re-watched a few Season 1 episodes today, and after tonight's episode realize that I'm much happier when the core characters/issues from the early days (including Cooper) are front and center.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:44AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      leahblizz WOW, nice job pointing out the parallels in Roger and Don's scenes with their wives! That makes me feel even more like Don and Megan's relationship is doomed.

      April 23, 2012 at 3:27AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      A I'm not sure about that kind of direct internal referencing - circularity or parallelism eventually can act as shortcuts to profundity. Seeing how Don & Megan tear around the apartment & don't have sex to resolve their problems works because it's a culmination of other behavior of theirs we've seen in the premiere, two weeks ago, etc. But to physically compare Don & Megan to Roger & Jane is metaphoric (and unnecessary at that, since we've been able to watch the similarities & differences between Roger & Don for years, in much more probable vehicles like dialogue & scenes at work, etc.).

      April 23, 2012 at 9:37PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      A Faux profundity, that is.

      April 24, 2012 at 5:46PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Beth

    Regarding Don being a monster, I read that as part of their game. I thought that's what Megan meant by "Every time we fight, it diminishes this. "

    April 23, 2012 at 2:46AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Target_field_4-12_talkback_profile

    dan.cook

    Loved the episode. If Roger's acid trip doesn't earn Slattery a "Best Supporting Actor" nom, then there's no justice in awards shows.

    Wait, what? We already knew that? Damn.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:51AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Lazy Iggy

    When Megan is yelling at Don "Take off your dress! Yes, Master!" with her arms folded, she looks just like the mannequin in the promo poster.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:53AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Guest "I Dream of Jeannie" reference

      April 23, 2012 at 7:32AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      bfish It made me think of "I Dream of Jeanie", especially the "Yes, Master" part. Was IDOJ on TV in 1966?

      April 23, 2012 at 7:50AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Wendi Yes

      April 23, 2012 at 8:04AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Mary That is funny because I thought Jane was actually dressed like I dream of Jeanie

      April 24, 2012 at 11:06AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Ann Yes, there was a lot of I dream of Jeannie in this one.

      April 29, 2012 at 11:52AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Craig

    Alan, Thanks for staying up to do these every week. It's always hard to get this show out of my head after a new episode. But especially with the increasingly funky ones we've been getting this season, I find it hard to get to sleep until I've read a well-reasoned analysis. Your recaps provide a weird sense of closure.

    While I liked the episode a lot, the LSD thing came from nowhere. Jane's "You agreed to drop LSD with us...remember?" felt like the way a sitcom might introduce a forced plotline; there's been no prior hint that Jane is interested in drug culture (or seeing a shrink, that I can recall). I guess you could argue that this was meant to make the audience empathise with the way Roger is coasting through this marriage without paying attention to his wife, but to me it just felt lazy. That being said, the payoff was of course phenomenal.

    I also sort of wish the show wouldn't play games with chronology unless there's REALLY a strong reason to do so. I watch MAD MEN to enjoy the characters, and to follow their progression from minute to minute, season to season. Seeing Don in the phone booth early on sort of ruined the later Don-Megan argument for me, because instead of focusing on the character nuances, I was preoccupied with "Crap! Something awful is gonna happen! Something awful is gonna happen!" It seems like Weiner really wants us to constantly be fearing the worst this season, and it's getting a tiny bit distracting. At the same time, I'm really intrigued to see where it's going.

    April 23, 2012 at 2:53AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      miss kim The phone booth scene also highlights how disconnected Peggy and Don are right now, so far removed from the Peggy and Don of "The Suitcase."

      April 23, 2012 at 9:43AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DC I suppose we get a very slight hint at Jane's new direction at the very close of season 3, when in the aftermath of the JFK assasination, Roger is on the phone, trying to talk her down from a variety of conspiracy theories. The seeds of marital discord were planted in the JFK episode, and the form it seems to have taken is her interest in an alternative intellectual sphere at a remove from Roger's conventional executive lifestyle. Speculating about the number of shooters in Dallas in Nov. 1963 is one form that this takes; hanging with Upper West Side psychoanalysts is perhaps another.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:58AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      MBG The 1966 Wikipedia calendar -- which the show has followed in recent episodes with Speck, UT shooter, etc. -- has a Timothy Leary reference on Sept. 19, and this episode was in September. So the acid was dropped right on time.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1966

      April 23, 2012 at 10:04AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      DC Sorry to overpost, but another point here is interesting: Weiner's take on the late 1960s is in some ways even darker than some of the conventional cultural imaginary surrounding it. The late 1960s is often presented in terms of its public catastrophes: the assassinations, the Watts uprisings, the Chicago DNC convention, etc. But this season is reminding us that in NYC, the late 1960s would often be experienced as a claustrophobic encroachment of crime and social decay, experienced at the most visceral personal level. We seem to be seeing Don Draper through the backwards historical gaze of Travis Bickle.

      April 23, 2012 at 10:06AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      JerseyRudy That is a great post by DC about the connection between the JFK assasination and the Jane that we see in this episode. What we now call the 1960s "counterculture" arose in large part from the distrust in authority stemming from the murder of JFK.

      Remember that it was the JFK assasination (and Lee Harvey Oswald's murder a few days later) that was the catalyst for Betty deciding to leave Don and marry Henry. So much of what has happened since then on the show can be traced back to that decision, just as so much that happened in the United States in the mid-late 60s can be traced back to the JFK assasination.


      April 23, 2012 at 4:26PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      cgeye And, not to overly link real life to fiction, but a prominent May/December couple to trip was Dyan Cannon and Cary Grant. Before the summer of love and covert hijinx, doctors used LSD therapeutically, as they are attempting to do, today, under informed consent and strict controls.

      April 23, 2012 at 6:48PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Daniel

    Not quite sure Roger would half to halve his fortune a second time in his divorce from Jane. After all- she did admit to cheating on him (even if it was just a kiss), which should give Roger (or his attorney) the ability to play hardball with her, no?

    April 23, 2012 at 2:54AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Lazy Iggy Well, seeing how the divorce is mutual, Roger and Jane (and their attorneys) could possibly collude to meet the necessary grounds for divorce.

      April 23, 2012 at 3:04AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      ritz That scene is why we have pre-nups now.

      April 23, 2012 at 9:42AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Jinjee Admitting to having kissed someone once and "stopped it" does not make Jane vulnerable to a round of hardball from Roger Sterling no matter who's paying the lawyers.

      April 23, 2012 at 11:13AM EST
    • Madmen_icon_talkback_profile

      LJA Plus, they've also only been married a couple of years, and there are no children. How much money did he make while he was married to her? Not very much. I don't think he's halving his fortune at all.

      April 23, 2012 at 11:25AM EST
Next 481 Comments

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web