Cannes Film Festival 2013

Review: All-star cast shines in 'Masterpiece' film 'Page Eight'

Bill Nighy, Rachel Weisz, Michael Gambon and Ralph Fiennes headline espionage drama

  • Critic's Rating B
  • Readers' Rating B
<p>Rachel Weisz and Bill Nighy in "Page Eight."</p>

Rachel Weisz and Bill Nighy in "Page Eight."

Credit: PBS

Johnny Worricker, the hero of the new "Masterpiece Contemporary" film "Page Eight" (Sunday at 9 on PBS), is in British intelligence, but not in the James Bond sense. He may occasionally don a tuxedo for professional reasons, and he's irresistible to a certain kind of woman (the lonely kind, mostly), but his job is to sit at a desk, study the reports that come across it, and figure out what they mean.

And it's a specific piece of paper that gives "Page Eight" both its title and its central conflict. Johnny has been in the game a long time, as has his boss and best friend Benedict, and while those years add wisdom, they can also create ennui. So it takes Johnny quite a while to notice there's something very wrong on page eight of his latest report, and even longer to realize what that means and what he has to do about it.

"Page Eight" was written and directed by David Hare, who wrote the scripts for "The Reader" and "The Hours" but is a playwright by trade. And there's a very stage-like quality to the film, much of it consisting of Johnny sitting in conference rooms and drawing rooms discussing his life, his legacy and the current state of British intelligence with friends and colleagues, most of them played by a murderer's row of British (and/or Australian) character actors. In addition to Bill Nighy as Johnny, we have Michael Gambon as Benedict, Judy Davis as their colleague Jill, Rachel Weisz as Johnny's inquisitive neighbor Nancy, Ralph Fiennes as the British prime minister, Alice Krige as one of Johnny's many ex-wives and Felicity Jones as their estranged daughter.

These thespians(*) sit around and utter lines that are larded with meaning, as when Benedict explains to Johnny, "This building is swimming in information. We have information coming out of our ears. So the difficult thing is to notice when someone finally tells you something."

(*) Some, but not all, of them have figured prominently in the Harry Potter films (even Nighy briefly played the Minister of Magic), making this a very Hogwarts double feature with next week's "Masterpiece" film, "The Song of Lunch," starring Alan Rickman and Emma Thompson.

And when "Page Eight" is just these fine actors tossing clever dialogue at each other and contemplating the inexorable passage of time, it's marvelous. Bill Nighy in particular delivers a kind of master class in minimalism. Johnny's inflection rarely changes, his expression only slightly more, and yet there's so much in his eyes about regret, and rapidly closing doors, and the reasons behind his unexpected burst of heroism over the course of the film. He's fantastic.

Yet the first half of the movie, before we learn quite what's on page eight and what that means, begins to feel like a shell game after a while. Hare wants to keep the pieces moving around without showing you what's underneath them, because he's not entirely sure what's there or what to do with it once he finds out.

As the movie heads into its second half, it takes tentative steps towards being a genuine spy story. Johnny goes rogue, has to shake a tail, perform surveillance and other bits of spycraft, and his new friendship with Nancy begins edging into romantic territory. But Hare's heart doesn't seem to be in any of the more conventional parts of the narrative. Weisz's character never really fits into the rest of the film, and the conspiracy Johnny is fighting against seems less a driver for a thriller plot than it does an excuse for Hare to discuss the efficacy of torture.

So long as "Page Eight" sticks to its strengths - great performances, crackling dialogue, a palpable sense of loss - it's well worth your time. It's when it tries to be something it's not - maybe not Ian Fleming, but John LeCarre - that it stumbles.

Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    virginia

    So excited about this ... Great cast and Bill Nighy can do no wrong. Love him to death.

    November 5, 2011 at 2:24PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Tausif Khan

    Thanks so much for the PBS coverage.

    I don't even care if you write about how you hate the shows on PBS. I just hope that you cover them.

    November 5, 2011 at 6:51PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Tausif Khan *You or anyone in the critical community.

      November 5, 2011 at 6:51PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      berkowit28 Yes, I don't understand why PBS shows are so studiously ignored for the most part. No semiannual junkets? No advertising on the blogs? What's it all about?

      Thanks for the pointer to a David Hare TV film. I'll be watching.

      November 6, 2011 at 12:50AM EST
    • Berkowit28 - PBS presents at the TCA Press Tour the same as other networks. This summer Alan live-blogged the Cameron Crowe Pearl Jam doc panel and I live-blogged the "Downton Abbey" panel. PBS fills two days every tour. Sometimes we provide blog coverage. I'm always at the panels and providing Twitter coverage.

      As for the lack of advertising on blogs, that's on PBS, not on us. The HitFix sales staff -- 100 percent autonomous and unrelated to our editorial team -- doesn't discriminate who we take ads from. All PBS would have to do is want to advertise with us.

      -Daniel

      November 6, 2011 at 1:09AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      berkowit28 I wasn't speaking so much of here. After all, Alan has previewed Page Eight. There are other blogs, such as AV Club, which must review 200 or so shows per week, that act as if PBS doesn't exist and haven't noticed Page Eight at all. I can't help but wonder if PBS's limited or nonexistent advertising budget has something to do with the poor attention it ends up getting. I'm glad that you and Alan do what you do, though interesting shoes do get missed. This one at least is getting a bot of attention.

      November 6, 2011 at 3:49AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Tausif Khan @Berkowit28

      The AV Club actually frequently reviews PBS's documentary/news programming. Frontline is reviewed regularly. TV Club editor Todd Van Der Werff has proclaimed that Frontline probably has the smartest audience of any television program.

      That being said their coverage of Masterpiece and other scripted programming has been more scatter shot. The AV Club tends to review miniseries on PBS in one chunk. Any Human Heart, Zen (also reviewed by Dan Fienberg here at Hitfix) and Case Histories were all reviewed by Todd Van Der Werff in one chunk. Case Histories review was posted on the premiere of the last installment of this first series. One reader complained that it would have been a more useful review if it had appeared before the first installment and would have alerted them to the show but Van Der Werff cited that TV Club had been busy and no one was able to write the review on the first premiere night. I would be happier if the series were reviewed on an episode by episode basis (or mini-movie installment by mini-movie installment) but no one has.

      I have tried to get Todd's reasoning as to why The AV Club doesn't review PBS with as much attention as say HBO. He pointed out that the number of comments that a PBS scripted review receives is too low to be worth a reviewers time to review it. I can see how that would be a valid argument but at the same time I believe the quality of the work necessitates need of a review and not simply a popular audience.

      Another issue with PBS which Alan pointed out in the podcast. This is that PBS's programming will debut at different times around the country which makes its programming difficult to review on a national site and have it be of meaning to the entire readership all at once.

      A huge proponent of PBS scripted programming and British programming in general is AOL TV Squad Stay Tuned blogger Maureen "Mo" Ryan. Her reviews are great to read and she helps to highlight a lot of programming her critic friends either don't have the time for or are not interested in covering.

      Nonetheless, I continue to hope that PBS will get more coverage from Hitfix and Tbe AV Club. Dan Fienberg has mentioned numerous times that he laments not covering it more rigorously. So please, please cover it more.

      November 7, 2011 at 1:21AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      webdiva Todd's reasoning re: not reviewing more PBS dramas is a self-fulfilling prophecy: when you don't bother to publish the reviews until a mini-series is nearly over, there's not much reason for readers to get involved and comment, at that point -- and Todd KEEPS it that way by waiting to publish. He gets the poor showing he programmed. If he consistently published reviews before the episodes aired and got readers accustomed to that fact over time, he'd probably get a much higher response for PBS shows. People who conduct readership studies say it takes nearly a year of publishing a newsletter or magazine in which you're made changes for those changes to really penetrate your readership's minds before those changes register -- so what can Todd possibly expect if he 1) writes so rarely about PBS and 2) does so after the fact, i.e., when almost nobody *would* care??

      Now the question is whether it will take a year for *this* bit of insight to register with HIM ... Sigh.

      So yes, BIG BIG thank you to you folks for reviewing PBS shows. It's one of several reasons I keep returning to HitFix and to Alan's column in particular. As for Mo Ryan: hey, she's from Chicago, and our PBS station here, WTTW, has produced many fine shows over the decades that it has then distributed to other PBS stations, so Mo is habituated to regularly reviewing WTTW (and,l consequently, PBS shows). Keep it up, girl!

      November 7, 2011 at 10:06AM EST
    • Lrg-170-dust_free_but_still_pouty_talkback_profile

      anthonystrand I guess this might be a bit late, but the AV Club did review Page Eight on Sunday.

      http://www.avclub.com/articles/page-eight,64629/

      November 8, 2011 at 6:12PM EST
  • Godzillavseaster_talkback_profile

    Dezbot

    Thanks for bringing this up--never would have known about it if you hadn't reviewed it!

    November 6, 2011 at 9:10PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    blingbling

    Bill Nighy is my hero.

    November 7, 2011 at 12:36AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      virginia Mine too. Gideon's Daughter and The Big Lebowski (apart from this discussion) the two best films of the 90s in my book. And I would love to see Nighy and Bridges working together, with Poliakoff and the Ethan and Joel in tow. My dream. Nighy can do anything.

      November 7, 2011 at 11:16PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    virginia

    The super tense scene between the PM and Johnny alone was worth the price of admission. I so wish that Sam Mendes would commit to film David Hare's "The Vertical Hour" which starred the always marvelous Bill Night and Julianne Moore. On Boardway a couple of years back. Mendes directed it.

    November 7, 2011 at 1:11AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Bob

    This was outstanding. It was like take the main character of Rubicon, age him forty years, and make him a lot more morose and make the action realistic instead of silly. The dynamic between Nighy's and Weisz's damaged characters was excellent.

    Spoiler for last scene:

    Okay, so that was the file he threw in the bin right? He wanted confirmation that the Israeli plot would be investigated, and when he saw the news, keeping their side of the bargain he threw the file in the trash. I wonder if his hand was that tied--that he couldn't just release it to the press. Probably not as the source he found could have been fake or it was too high up for him to do anything about it.

    November 7, 2011 at 3:04AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    David D.

    First: what a joy to see Judy Davis (and to a lesser extent, Marthe Keller) again. I love her work and have missed seeing her. And secondly, it amazes me, after seeing Bill Nighy's controlled, subtle work over the past few years, that anyone would have even considered him for a SECOND to give such an over-the-top, outrageous performance as Davy Jones in the "Pirates" movies. I just cannot imagine THAT guy doing that, even without all the makeup.

    November 7, 2011 at 9:18AM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      virginia Still Crazy, Love Actually, Victor in the "Underworld" series. Nighy does loony and BSC really really well. His performance in Still Crazy is delicious from beginning to end.

      November 7, 2011 at 11:40AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    kdh3000

    I watched Page Eight before reading this review and Alan definitely highlighted the best part of the show (Bill Nighy). The thriller elements didn't really work outside of the low key confrontation between Johnny and the PM. The overall thriller plot didn't hold together for me. I thought the reason Page Eight would be a PR disaster for the PM is that it showed he had important intelligence and didn't share it with MI-5, potential risking British lives; however, it's later revealed that the PM had his own unit within MI-5 that he was sharing the intel with. I don't think it would be too much of a scandal for the PM to be sharing intel with some parts of MI-5 and not others.

    November 7, 2011 at 11:24AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    virginia

    David Hare's work is always a bit spotty although I admire him greatly. I think his intent in writing this minor piece may have been 1) to stick it to Tony Blair, and 2) to remind us of the immense talents of this unfortunately under-utilized group of actors. The film seemed rushed and incoherent at times, but great small portraits. And I for one love the British nonchalalence in depicting the travails of marriage and what drives the humans to screw around when they oughtn't. A refreshing change from much of American tv. Write a comment...

    November 7, 2011 at 11:47AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    berkowit28

    I thought this was an outstanding film. The very last scene was a bit disappointing, as he leaves the country all by himself, but very Le Carré, I suppose, in its dejection and portrayal of the sole honorable man left, consistent with what came before. Although he himself was the one who leaked the Israeli document, it looked like (or was it the government who leaked the actual document, and Rollo and Johnny only the outline to the BBC?), at least the PM didn't contradict but went along with it. Did he really have to leave the country in fear of his life though? That seems a bit over the top.

    November 7, 2011 at 1:37PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Marc i agree, utterly outstanding, i recorded it and have now watched it 5 times because of the fine cast and acting. the ending puzzled me too. he says he cut a deal, but he leaked the Israeli report himself and then tosses the secret file himself. does this mean the deal was that he would do the leaking and return the file later? the govt would go along with that? that all seemed weak to me unless what really happened is he made a deal and then completely reneged to get even for the govt's behavior.

      November 14, 2011 at 1:57PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Alf

    Just another regular Masterpiece viewer here saying thanks for covering this.

    November 7, 2011 at 3:02PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Tausif Khan

    "Some, but not all, of them have figured prominently in the Harry Potter films (even Nighy briefly played the Minister of Magic), making this a very Hogwarts double feature with next week's "Masterpiece" film, "The Song of Lunch," starring Alan Rickman and Emma Thompson. "

    Bill Nighy on Fresh Air said many of the actors were drawn to the project because of David Hare.

    However, if you notice the opening credits you also see David Heyman is one of the producers on the program and of the Harry Potter films.

    November 8, 2011 at 4:24AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    dan

    Did anyone spot the "UK Eyes Only" on the front of the report? For British Eyes Only...

    November 9, 2011 at 12:14AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web