Cannes Film Festival 2013

Interview: 'Mad Men' creator Matthew Weiner looks back on season four

On Don's journey, Don and Peggy's relationship, and the budding talent of Kiernan Shipka

<p>Peggy and Don's growing relationship was a big story in "Mad Men" season four.</p>

Peggy and Don's growing relationship was a big story in "Mad Men" season four.

Credit: AMC

The "Mad Men" season four finale airs tomorrow night, and while I had hoped to talk to creator Matthew Weiner after seeing it, his travel schedule meant he was only available for a 15-minute conversation this morning. If you've read some of my past conversations with Weiner like this one, you know the answers tend to be long (but always interesting), so I could only hit on a few topics from this season, and threw in the Joan one at the end when I got the one-minute warning from the AMC publicist.

Still, we talked about Don, and Don and Peggy, and the great child acting of Kiernan Shipka, and because I haven't seen the finale, and because Matt so obviously hates spoilers, you don't have to worry about any finale details being revealed.

The first question of the season is "Who is Don Draper?" And it seems as if the way you've chosen to answer it is through his relationships with a lot of different women. Betty's out of his life, Anna dies, but here comes Faye and Megan and Miss Blankenship and even Bethany and Phoebe. Peggy has changed and Sally's become a woman. Is that the key to figuring out who Don is?

The question isn't for the audience to figure out who Don is. It's for Don to figure out who Don is. Thematically, that's what it's about. You take away the institution of marriage, your fatherhood, your home, car, the corporate environment that is way safer. Took away every aspect of his life like that, for a guy who is all about this contrived identity - knew he wanted to be the man in the suit with the wife and the car and all the stuff that the writer talks about in the first episode - that he doesn't have anymore. To me, that leaves Don with a moment of saying, "If I can't define myself with that list of attributes, who am I?"

He was struggling with that, I think, and throwing himself into work, as you would do. He's thrown himself into work in many crises during the show, and a lot of Americans, male and female, identify with that behavior. It was said in episode three, "I can't fix that, but I can fix this." Him corrupting Lane is him throwing himself into the things he can control. And he was out of control. The idea to have a relationship with a woman, it's a lot easier to sleep with Bethany Van Nuys if you're married than if you're available and have to put in the work of a relationship. And he's getting older.

Every character, the question writers ask each other is "What do they want?" Actors ask you that. And I think that's what you're seeing, is that Don is trying to establish some kind of normal life in the midst of this, familiar to him kind of freefall. There's no coordinates, no institutions to hold onto. It's completely up to him. He doesn't have the security of having that complete life here. Even if he's abandoning it or ignoring it or violating its tenets by cheating on his wife or whatever, it's not there. He did what he does: he worked too much and went from being a heavy drinker to a problem drinker, and I think he screwed a lot of stuff up in his life. But to me, it was a kind of purification. That included  losing Anna in there, the only person who's really known him. He's trying to build these institutions. Is he replacing her with Peggy in some way? I hope so. But then he doesn't have to hide who he is anymore to most people. We think that.

So here's Don with a chance to put his name on the firm, put his name in the paper, become some union of Dick Whitman and Don Draper. It's all there. And he doesn't have to worry about the family. There's a freedom to it, and he doesn't respond well to it. And then the shit hits the fan and you see, what is he really made of? Once the North American thing happens, and the Lucky Strike thing starts falling apart, I think you're starting to see whatever journey whatever journey he was taking to become a more enlightened person, I think he's becoming sidetracked.

Want More...

Mad Men?
  • Madmen_don_652_thumbnail
    Check out everything there is including photos, reviews, videos.
Yeah, the move with the New York Times ad is the sort of thing he might have done before this journey of self-discovery.

It is, exactly. And it's really necessary. We talked about the Kennedy assassination and how Don's reaction to it, even as Betty's telling him she didn't love him, was, "Take a pill. It'll be okay." He is a survivor. He doesn't dwell on things too much. I think the powerlessness that went along with what had happened with Lucky Strike and losing all that, you see a survivor. You see someone who is turning their emotions, and their feelings of hurt into a kind of ingenious weapon. Whether it succeeds or not, Don definitely felt better.

I want to get back to what you said before about the notion of Peggy maybe replacing Anna, because that's the thing I took out of "The Suitcase." That, to me, was one of the best episodes you've ever done.

Thank you. It's a big payoff.

Exactly. Three and a half years to build up to it.

I love that they have these conversations about things in there, and there's no nouns in the conversation. "You know about that thing where my mother thinks you were the one." We know it, and they know it. Of course they know it! They know each other. They've just never said it.

There's no relationship quite like Don and Peggy on TV, in terms of a male/female thing, where it is strictly platonic, professional, mentor/mentee in this way. Other than in the pilot where he quickly rejected her, it's never gone there. Where does that relationship between the two of them come from in terms of your inspiration?

I've been both those people, luckily, in my life. Especially the mentor/mentee thing. I write these episodes, so anyone who thinks I'm subconsciously revealing some side of myself to the audience by Dons' behavior is nuts. I know exactly what parts of me are Don and what parts of me are Peggy, and I love the idea of embracing the gray area of authorship and creativity. But really, I love how they feel about their work and how similar they are. To me, it comes from a desire to really really have a respectful bond with another human being, and the discovery of that is a joy. It really is. And it's an expression of love. To me it's always been a fake thing on television that everyone who works togther loves each other, and they're friends and they all go out to the local bar together. It's a wish fulfillment that's sold by television. And I've had a lot of jobs and a lot of TV writer friends, but I've still never really experienced that, at least on a deep, deep level. It takes a long time. 

We were joking about this, that on a normal TV show, Joan and Peggy would've been living with each other after the first episode. We've maintained this working relationship between them is somewhat contentious, because Joan knows what she's doing has chosen a different kind of life, and Peggy has chosen her kind of life. When you look at Don and Peggy, how much of a relationship can they really have? Here you have something that's not complicated by sex - maybe it is on some level, because Peggy perceives that Don has rejected her - but it's almost like Don respects her too much to blow her out of his life with this kind of behavior. Don does not have any equals. It's not just ego, he just has such a peculiar sense of himself. And what we are seeing with Peggy is an equal. Whether it's male/female, mentor/mentee, or whatever else it is we haven't seen it with any of the girlfriends, we haven't seen it with his wife, with any of the men in his life. Maybe Pete is becoming an equal, but he doesn't do what Don does.

It's just a great feeling, to me, to see emotions that are earned. Peggy had gained Don's respect, but she's gained our respect. We've seen her do more. And Don has been kinder to Peggy, but it's not this magnanimous, paternalistic kindness. It's someone who says, "I love that you know me." Have they ever talked about Betty? Have you ever heard the name Betty mentioned between them?

Maybe in season one, when Peggy was his secretary it might have come up?

Oh, right, when she had to cover for him with the Christmas card. But what is their relationship based on? Talk about, "Who am I?" Whatever the pure thing that is Don, when you strip his power away as her boss - because she said, "You don't have any power over me. I'm either here or I'm not." - you're really getting Don. She's really getting Don and he's really getting Peggy. That's really what the relationship is about. They're not super expressive people, or confiding people, and you're getting all of that when they talk to each other. And it's done through work, and there's something pure in that.

When did you realize, over the course of the series, what you had in Kiernan Shipka? That she was going to be able to do all these things you've asked her to do this year?

Honeslty? You never know with any actor, that they're going to be able to do that much. I know all these people, and I never let my imagination be limited by what I think people can and cannot do. I let the characters do what they're going to do. With Kiernan, she's a minor, has this great mom and dad who are not stage parents. She's kind of like a piano prodigy. When did I realize that?

Well, early in the series, she didn't do a whole lot, and there had to come a point where you gave her some material and said, "Oh, wow. Okay."

I think if you look back, you'll see stuff where, for people who work with children, they'd be surprised by how much a human being's in there. Just her doing ballet at the family dinner, or her creeping in and listening to the parents fight, or talking to Don. I realized right away that there was somebody special in there. I tried to put myself back at that age. I have kids, and my son's in the show, but he's older than her. And at that age, I couldn't talk to an adult the way she does, I certainly couldn't have walked on a set, I never could have memorized anything. Plus the fact that she has this ability to separate who is Sally and who is her and to really get into it. And you know what else? She's been going to this amazing acting school for four years. She's on the set with these people. Every scene she has is with Jon Hamm, or January. She has great natural ability. When we cast her, I hoped she could do what she was doing. Last year, I said, "She's so important to the audience that I do want to start telling stories from her point of view." We had this episode last year with Grandpa Gene dying - she had a big story last year. She just completely delivered for me. This was an extension of that.

There's been a lot of speculation ever since the episode where Joan goes to the abortion clinic over whether or not she actually did it. Obviously, you don't want to spoil it if it comes up in the finale, but did you intend for it to be as ambiguous as many people have taken that storyline?

No. I really didn't. But you have to watch the show. I don't have control over what people see. That is a perfect example of people bringing what they want to bring to the show. And Joan is so strong that we know that whatever decision she made, she made that decision and it's good for her. But you do have to watch. I'm not going to say there is no ambiguity to the event; I just didn't know that people would interpret it the way they did.

Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Michael G.

    Great interview. Shame you weren't able to do a post-mortem, at least not for some time.

    That last answer certainly makes it seem like Joan got the abortion.

    October 16, 2010 at 1:02PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall That was my initial reaction, but then I showed that passage to Fienberg, and he said it could be the exact opposite: that Weiner intended for it to be fairly clear that Joan changed her mind, and that he was therefore surprised so many people like me assumed she went through with it.

      Like that episode itself, you can read it either way.

      October 16, 2010 at 1:50PM EST
    • Stubby1_talkback_profile

      cadfile In a TV Squad interview Weiner seemed to be more exact:

      "Do we know if Joan has actually gotten an abortion or not?
      I think you're gonna have to watch the episode. I mean, I don't know how you could think it was anything else, but I'm not gonna weigh in on that."

      Then he thought he went to far and changed to a "no comment" response.

      I do think he could go either way so I don't know myself

      October 16, 2010 at 2:35PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      matt I really want you to be right about being able to read it either way (I think keeping the baby would be perfect for Joan's character at this point). But how did Fienberg get around "that is a perfect example of people bringing what they want to bring to the show" in his rebellious interpretation of the answer?

      October 16, 2010 at 2:54PM EST
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan matt - Where does that line change the meaning of anything? Alan's question didn't put weight on either interpretation of the closing of that episode, nor does Weiner's response. I can read Weiner's answer as a validation of either interpretation, since I don't think either interpretation came across as a majority, consensus opinion. If you assume/pretend that to Weiner's mind, the "She didn't get an abortion and she's keeping the baby" was the obvious and correct and unambiguous reading, his answer could/would be exactly the same, wouldn't it?

      -Daniel

      October 16, 2010 at 3:01PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      fritanga Everyone seems to be ignoring the fact that afterward Joan said something like "I've taken care of the problem" to Roger. Why would she lie when a pregnancy would be very obvious in a couple of months (Joan is zaftig but not that zaftig)? I think it's why we saw her in the doctor's office at the beginning of the season. It was deliberately telling the audience that she'd had abortions before, probably during her previous affair with Roger. She's been through it before and she's nothing if not practical and realistic about such things. I may be wrong, but I think she went through with it.

      October 17, 2010 at 4:30AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Obxboy I think you have to pay attention to Weiner's comment, "But you do have to watch." All season, time has been compressed. We've seen jumps of weeks between episodes. I think if Joan was pregnant, there would be more evidence of it. On the other hand, I've learned to never get comfortable with what appears to be obvious on this show.

      October 17, 2010 at 11:14AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Matt Dan- I felt that because Joan indicated that she had the abortion (and because the rest of the episode did nothing to contradict the indication) that the quote about viewers projecting their emotions into the show suggested that her keeping the baby was a baseless fantasy.

      October 18, 2010 at 4:59AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      dtor "I don't have control over what people see. That is a perfect example of people bringing what they want to bring to the show.... But you do have to watch. I'm not going to say there is no ambiguity to the event; I just didn't know that people would interpret it the way they did."

      So after telling Roger that "it's seven weeks, there's no way I can pass the baby off as his," and then actually leading Roger to believe she went through with the abortion, Weiner is surprised that some of us naturally assumed Joan went through with the abortion? I guess anyone who did come to such a conclusion is a sucker, then, for expecting Weiner to play fair in that episode and not resort to trickery just to have a surprise in the season finale. I am very disappointed by this.

      October 18, 2010 at 9:14AM EST


  • Alan, wee you planning on asking Weiner about January Jones' limited role this season? I'm curious to know how he sees Betty's story this year.

    October 16, 2010 at 2:06PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall No. He talked about that with me in the pre-season interview, and in other interviews he's done this week. Given the limited amount of time and my general level of interest in Betty, I wasn't going to devote a question to her.

      October 16, 2010 at 7:25PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      EOTW Less Betty = Me happy.

      October 17, 2010 at 11:15AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    evie

    As a person who believed/hoped she didn't go through with it, I'm now bummed. But if she did go through it, MM writers blew it with the post-abortion effects. There is pain involved. Physical pain. We saw none of that.

    btw -- great interview. I'm especially gratified by the discussion of Peggy and Don. He sees them exactly as I do.

    October 16, 2010 at 2:43PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Abortionist Not after just two months or so. A foetus is a thing, not a person.

      October 16, 2010 at 3:23PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Reeb Or she was lying about feeling pain to Roger. Why assume she would be truthful about not feeling pain if you already assumed she was lying about going through with the abortion?

      October 16, 2010 at 3:46PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Ali McKenzie Reply to comment...

      October 16, 2010 at 4:42PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Alison The extent of pain varies from woman to woman, and is generally less in the first 8-10 weeks (especially if performed properly). Remember, many women had crippling period pain, and were completely used to working through that too. In season 1, when Peggy rips her skirt, and Joan assumes she has blood stains, Joan offers to send her home, however I suspect Joan herself would work through even with very difficult pain.

      October 16, 2010 at 7:25PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    nathan

    > There's no relationship quite like Don and Peggy on TV, in terms of a male/female thing, where it is strictly platonic, professional, mentor/mentee in this way.

    What about Liz Lemon and Jack Donaghy?

    October 16, 2010 at 3:30PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Sarah I was thinking the same thing! But since Mad Men is a drama and 30 Rock's a comedy, there is still a bit of a difference.

      October 16, 2010 at 10:13PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      pws One could argue that Liz and Jack do not have the most professional of relationships :p, at least not in the context of any realistic kind of working world. They do fit the bill for platonic, mentor/mentee though!

      October 18, 2010 at 5:01AM EST
  • Bertrum376183_283071751727043_186933131340906_993200_1940268190_n_talkback_profile

    Angela

    And now I understand why Mad Men is so great! Matthew has such incredible insight into so many aspects of life and relationships.

    For instance: "To me, it comes from a desire to really really have a respectful bond with another human being, and the discovery of that is a joy. It really is. And it's an expression of love. To me it's always been a fake thing on television that everyone who works togther loves each other, and they're friends and they all go out to the local bar together. It's a wish fulfillment that's sold by television."

    That first part is so true but I have never heard anyone articulate it before, much less put it into a TV show. I don't think too many people realize it either. They want a man/woman relationship to be sexual. And if it's not, then there's something wrong with it or it's not as good as one that is.

    And that comment about how Peggy and Joan would be living together by the second episode if it were a different TV show. :-D

    Or how everyone who works together loves each other, and hangs out together after work, being a wish fulfillment that's sold on TV. Hallelujah! Finally someone in the TV world said it out loud.

    Ok. Maybe it's been said before but I've never heard it. And some people really do believe it's true and wonder why they don't have that. I know, because when I was younger I used to wonder why I didn't have that group to hang out with.

    I am fascinated by a show that deals with the question of who you really are when how you define yourself is taken away from you. (Much less if you've stolen another person's identity.) And if one doesn't have the option to dive into work while you deal with it? Isn't that a question we ask ourselves at some point in our lives but is just so impossible to answer. But I've never considered it an opportunity for purification. Huh.

    This is only the second interview I've ever read with Matt Weiner. I'm hoping that's why it's taken me so long to figure out why Mad Men is so damn good!

    October 16, 2010 at 4:05PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Madmen_icon_talkback_profile

    mad about Madmen

    I was wondering if anyone has heard whether or not there will be a fifth season

    October 16, 2010 at 4:22PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Echos Myron Yes, AMC's contract with Weiner entails that there will be. There was an article about it posted in July. You can find is somewhere on the Mad Men wiki entry.

      October 16, 2010 at 6:53PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Allison M.

    I think Weiner is a bit disingenuous when he says that he did not intend any ambiguity over whether Joan had the abortion. He could have shown the nurse calling her name and her entering the room like the young girl. He also could have had her stay home the next day and had the conversation between her and Roger occur over the phone. The way the scene was cut and Joan's appearance at the office the next day, as if nothing happened, cast doubt on whether she really went through with it. Abortion in 1965 was a more complicated procedure than it is today and it is highly doubtful she would have returned to work and felt so chipper. Maybe she did have the abortion, but the writers clearly want to keep us guessing.

    October 16, 2010 at 5:52PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      nic919 I agree. As much as I like the show, I find Weiner to be more and more condescending as the show gets more successful and his answer to Alan makes it seem as though the audience is too dumb to figure out what is so obvious in his mind only. His zealousness regarding spoilers is also tiresome. It's just a television show and so unless the Joan question is directly dealt with in the finale, he should have provided a concrete answer. Thank goodness for the great performances of the actors, because they make me forget how much of a pompous ass Weiner seems to be in real life, e.g. the Emmy acceptance speech.

      October 16, 2010 at 6:25PM EST
    • Bertrum376183_283071751727043_186933131340906_993200_1940268190_n_talkback_profile

      Angela @nic919 I'm glad I missed that speech. I've only heard bad things. I think he was just saying we have to watch the show closely and then we would know. Perhaps he doesn't realize that what he envisions in his head, doesn't always make across to the viewers.

      October 17, 2010 at 10:21PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    briguyx

    Ah, but it's not just about Joan having a baby. I know I expect her husband not to make it home from Vietnam, which would make her a single mother. Or conversely, not telling her husband they're raising a baby that's not his...

    October 17, 2010 at 12:49AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    anna

    Nice interview. I wish you'd asked him about what he's done to Betty this season.

    October 17, 2010 at 1:48AM EST Reply to Comment
  • A_talkback_profile

    belinda

    I think I question how ambiguous Weiner really wanted the Joan clinic scnene to be. Obviously, he has a clearly defined answer in his mind, but given in the interview he doesn't answer either way and left it ambiguous, it seems that he did intend for it to be as ambiguous as it was. (Which is fine. But by answering it so ambiguously, he seems to contradict himself in terms of how ambiguous he really intended it to be. Especially compared with Gilligan - and the maybe ambiguous last shot of S3 Breaking Bad, Gilligan could have very well led us on without answering, but he didn't. So, I trust that he really didn't intend any ambiguity in that scene).

    Given Weiner's enthusiasm in Shipka, I guess we will be seeing more of her (and Betty) next season. I liked what we saw of Sally, but I still think the show has problems integrating Sally/Betty into the story. Hope they can do a better job next season.

    Alan, did you ask Weiner about Pete and Don's relationship? Other than Peggy/Don, that has got to be my favorite relationship (and one which like Peggy/Don, also developed and progressed a lot over the seasons).

    October 17, 2010 at 3:08AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    FatBallet

    FWIW Last week I replied in a comment and used the word "crochet"; since then I have gotten five spams related to 'thr-ead', 'se-wing' and 'ya-rn'. Coincidence probably but I've never seen them before. Choose your words carefully!;o) (Hopefullly I wont get more spam from Mi-rriam We-bster, et al...

    October 17, 2010 at 10:24PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Misterpuff

    Feinberg was right

    October 17, 2010 at 11:34PM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web