Interview: 'Breaking Bad' creator Vince Gilligan post-mortems season 4
On Gus, Tio and what exactly happened with that cigarette
The "Breaking Bad" writers spent a while setting up the rivalry between Tio (Mark Margolis) and Gus (Giancarlo Esposito).
Are you a fan of Breaking Bad?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
"Breaking Bad" just ended its fourth season in memorable fashion. You can read my review of the season finale here, and I spoke with the show's creator, Vince Gilligan, about everything that went down and some of his plans for the series' final 16 episodes, all coming up just as soon as I spend time in an electrician chat room...
We have to start at the ending, with that shot of the Lily of the Valley plants in Walt's backyard. This is a very, very bad thing he's done, isn't it?
Yes it is. Walt has come a long way in 46 episodes, that is for sure. But he had a reason for doing it. As bad as it is, my personal take on it is that it was not about murdering a child. It was about making a child very sick but making it seem, more importantly, to Jesse that a child who was very close to him had been poisoned with Ricin. To our way of thinking, it was a very cold-blooded and yet pragmatic way of getting Jesse back in Walt's sphere of influence. It was a very big gamble that Walt was taking, to essentially make Jesse think he had poisoned this child, so Jesse would come to him, ostensibly to kill him, but then to ultimately hear him out and get back on Walt's side. It was a very big gamble that could have ended in Walt getting his head blown off by Jesse, but also a very, very dark secret that goes pretty much hat in hand with the secret that Walt keeps from Jesse about Jane - his guilt about Jane's death. Walt's a pretty bad guy these days, but as usual, everything he does, he does for a very specific reason, cold-blooded though it may be.
I want to get into the mechanics of the plan that Walt hatched. A big deal is made in the previous episode about the chain of custody of the ricin cigarette. What happened to it?
I think Jesse had the right idea. I think it was lifted off him by Huell. When he comes to Walt in the previous episode, and Walt asks how on earth would he could have done it, and Jesse says, "The big man mountain security guard of Saul's just had to see me, and he pats me down. You got him to get it off of me." So having done that, he could've just flushed it in the toilet, because as we find out, the child wasn't poisoned with ricin, he was poisoned with something else.
And Walt was somehow able to get access to Brock, to give him the berries.
Yeah. That part's probably the trickiest part. I can't remember the specifics, but we worked it out in the writer's room. He technically had enough hours to do it. How he found his way over there unseen is probably a little improbable, perhaps, but not impossible, is the way we figured it.
Well, one of the things I found interesting was that even earlier in the episode, before we find out about the Lily of the Valley plant, there's the scene where Walt goes to the house, and he sends his neighbor in, basically as the canary in the coal mine. So there's a couple of points in the episode where Walt is risking innocent civilian lives to protect himself.
That's true. And by the way, the little old lady next door is my mom. (laughs)
Was that bit there to set up the idea that Walt has already moved past that point, so it'll perhaps be a little bit less out of character when you then see the Lily of the Valley shot at the end?
Yeah, I think so. Walt has been a dark guy for a while, but he's definitely darker than he's ever been.
What exactly causes Gus's incident of Spidey-sense in the parking garage that keeps him from going to the car?
I think with that, he finds out in the previous scene in the chapel, he knows his lynchpin remaining meth cook is acting up, and hears this child's in the hospital, figures he has to go talk to the kid, get him right with Jesus, get him cooking, despite what's going on in his personal life. I think his Spidey-sense is all about the way Jesse looks at him in the chapel when he says the little boy's not sick, he was poisoned. That in and of itself sounds strange and sounds too coincidental not to be somehow involved with Walter White. I think his Spidey-sense keys off of Jesse's strange behavior in this hospital chapel.
Well, watching that episode, you have set all of us up to believe what Jesse believes, which is that Gus has poisoned him. It definitely makes more sense from the perspective we have now, but at the time, we don't quite know that.
I think it works on both levels. At the time, if you believe that Gus did indeed poison the little boy, then what you'd assume if you were Gus, when you get this kid alone and he says the little boy has been poisoned - then Gus is too smart to say, "Who do you think poisoned him?" But he's assuming Jesse will say, "I think Mr. White did it." But because Jesse never says who did it, or who he thinks, that's another reason for Gus's Spidey-sense, as it were, to tingle.
How hard was it to say goodbye to Giancarlo Esposito, and to Mark Margolis as Tio? The story had reached a point where they had to go, but was that hard for you as a writer and producer of the show?
Very hard. We knew months and months ago how we were going to end the season, so I called up both of those gentlemen and told them 5 or 6 episodes in advance and of course swore them to secrecy. It was tough. Having that conversation with Giancarlo was tough, I felt I was letting him down somehow, but he was an absolute gentleman and a mensch. He said, "It sounds like a fun episode. Whatever you've got to do for the story, man. I'll miss being here, but do what you gotta do to tell your story." But it's tough. It's like ripping off your own hand or something, because these guys are an integral part of the show. But as you yourself just said, it was time. In the sense of the old "Highlander" movie, there can be only one. I think we got to the point where the town wasn't big enough for the both of them.
And if the goal is to ultimately have Walt become Scarface, you can't have Scarface's boss around anymore.
Exactly. At a certain point, you have to kill off Robert Loggia so Al Pacino can rise to prominence.
But on the other hand, you conveniently left Mike recuperating in Mexico. Have we seen the last of Mr. Banks?
I don't think we've seen the last of Mr. Banks. By the way, in keeping with the fact that people may die but don't completely leave us on "Breaking Bad," I would say that while we don't necessarily have plans for it at the moment, I can't imagine us getting through another 16 episodes of "Breaking Bad" without seeing Gus or Tio again in some flashback or another. I would hope, because it was just so much fun having those guys on the show. We historically do that: we bounce back and forth through time. I don't know why we couldn't do that again. But as far as Mike, you're right. Mike's still alive and kicking again down in Mexico, and I imagine we'll see him again next season.
Next season is 16 episodes, it sounds like they'll air over two years. How are you planning it out? Are you going to insert a specific break point around episode 8, 9 or 10?
I think so. It sounds to me like the thinking on the part of AMC is to split it into two seasons. So we'll try to have a proper cliffhanger, I would think, at the end of the first 8. Which I don't think would be too tough for us, because we try to do a cliffhanger more or less with everything we do. We try to play each one like it's our last as much as we possibly can. Hopefully, that won't be too tough.
That's another thing that occurred to me. By the time the negotiations came down to the wire, it was clear you were either going to continue on AMC or go to another network, but there was a chance when you were writing this episode that it might be the last episode of the show ever. Would you have been comfortable with Walt on the parking deck and then the shot of the White backyard being the end of the series, if it had come to that?
I think I personally would have been, yes. I think an argument could be made that the end of episode 13 of season 4 is, in essence, everything - but one thing, perhaps - that we promised the viewer, or implied to the viewer from day one, which is the idea of taking Mr. Chips and turning him into Scarface. Walt is pretty much as bad as one could imagine at the end of episode 413. There are two big questions left wanting for answers: one is what is the state of Walt's cancer, and the other is what about Hank? Will Hank ever figure out who Walter White truly is? Those would be the only really, for my money, big questions left outstanding. If for some reason a meteor hit the earth or something and then episode 413 was the last episode we were ever gonna do, I would feel pretty good except for those two being the only outstanding questions. However you slice it, I feel fortunate that we've got 16 more. I'm happy about that.
There's also the question about how Jesse will be if or when he finds out about Brock, about Jane, and about all the things Walt has done to him and the people he cares about.
Well, you're right. (laughs) Now that you say that, I can think of a few other outstanding questions. But having said that, something feels satisfying on some level to me about the way 413 ends, so if we had to end it there, I don't think it would be a terrible tragedy. But having said that, I've got a lot more I want to do with the show, so I'm proud to have 16 more episodes to play with.
Getting back to Walt's cancer, you're not going to tell me if it's back or not, and I don't want to know. But Bryan was coughing an awful lot in the last few episodes, which brings to mind the fact that much earlier in the season, Mike was coughing a lot for a while. I've been trained watching years of TV that there's no such thing as a coincidental cough. Was this a coincidental cough?
(Laughs)
Did Jonathan Banks just have a cold at the start of production?
(Laughs) You know what? I don't know quite how to answer that. I hate to sound coy, but sometimes there are coincidences and other times there aren't. I have to let that one pass unremarked, so as not to give too much away.
Well, that brings to mind something that became a running gag on the blog this year. Every little element of the show started being compared to the Chekhov's gun theory: Chekhov's throw rug, Chekhov's Ricin cigarette, Chekhov's .38 snub. You plant these things and then you pay them off later on. How far in advance do you have to work to introduce those things?
The one with the rug, not so very hard, because it was all contained within one episode. But the Ricin cigarette, for instance - the short answer is, we try whenever we possibly can, we prefer the long set-up versus the short one. It pleases us. It satisfies us as writers when we can play a very deep game, and play it as many moves ahead as possible. To that end, setting up Tio as Gus's nemesis, that we didn't realize how deep their enmity towards each other was, we started that in earnest this season with episode 8. That was a pretty good lead time, five episodes ahead. But some part of me wishes it had been deeper still, maybe another season before that. Although you kind of get hints the very first time Tio meets Gus along with the Cousins, that the old bastard does not care for Gus.
And also in the flashback in "One Minute," he clearly has a low opinion of "the Chicken Man."
That's true. So we're proud of playing that long game. Sometimes, the game looks like it's been played longer than it truly has. As you just said, that flashback in "One Minute," I don't think we were thinking back then about how Gus and Tio would meet their demise. But we looked back over everything we'd done and we knew there was no love lost between those guys from day one when they first met. We realized we could build on that reality, and add to it and amplify it. The audience realized that these guys don't just dislike each other, they loathe each other. The deep game we try to play, sometimes it feels a little deeper than it truly is. Sometimes, we look around, see where we are and realize fortuitous bits of happenstance that we can build on.
Who was it, and how long ago was it, that came up with the idea that Tio's bell would detonate the bomb that would kill Gus?
In the writers room, it really is a group mind, and you often forget who came up with what. Though I will say in this instance I think it was me. I will take a little executive privilege here. I loved the idea of Tio dinging that bell and blowing up Gus. I think we talked about that at the very beginning of the season, and then we shelved it for a while, and then we came back to it.
This is the first time where I can think a Walter White plan actually worked. Pretty much every other time he's plotted to kill somebody, something's gone wrong, he's had to improvise and kill them at the last minute. This all went to form, at the same time that Walt has, as you say, gone to a very, very dark place. Thematically, is that a coincidence? Or is it deliberate in your mind that Walt could only succeed at that level when he becomes this evil?
That's a very interesting question. I hadn't really thought of it in those terms. This world that he finds himself in, he doesn't find himself in this world by accident. He has made a conscious decision, starting in the very first episode of season one, to be a criminal, to be a bad guy and to live on the wrong side of the law. A guy as smart as Walt should realize pretty quickly that you don't play with fire and not get burned. What's the best way to put this? I'm hoping that when people watch this, they'll think this is the lost episode of the Roadrunner and the Coyote where the Coyote actually gets the Roadrunner. I guess it's a good argument you make: the darker Walt goes, the more chance he has of competing on a level playing field with Gustavo Fring. I hadn't thought of it in those terms, but I guess there is truth to that. This is yet another section of the very dark path he has long ago chosen to tread. So it's nothing new in one sense. In one sense, he's gone very dark indeed, but in another sense, this is the same path he's been on for quite a long time. It starts to feel somewhat inevitable, to me at least, that he would go this dark.
(Our phone interview ended here, but I had one e-mailed follow-up later.)
You've kept certain story points about what Walt is up to from viewers before (like Jesse still being in Albuquerque after Walt killed the drug dealers in "Half-Measures"), but never something this big, for this long. This is, if not a complete departure from your narrative style, definitely outside the norm, which is that we see Walt during everything interesting he's doing and know what he's up to. Why did you choose to tell this part of the story this way, as opposed to, say, letting us know from the start that Walt poisoned Brock and was manipulating Jesse?
I think it's because there's no bigger reveal than the fact that Walt would poison a child (albeit to save his own life and the lives of his family). That's the moment that truly makes him no better than Gus. Simply put, it seemed wise to me to save Walt's deepest, darkest secret until the very end.
Having said that, the lily of the valley is hinted at in episode 412 the week before. Walt sits by his pool, waiting to die. He spins his pistol twice in a row, and both times the muzzle winds up pointed straight at him. Is this fate telling him to shoot himself? But then, on the third spin, the muzzle points at the nearby lily of the valley. This, to me, is the moment that Walt begins to get his bold (and reprehensible) idea of poisoning Brock. Divine -- or devilish -- inspiration? Who knows?
Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
News From Our Partners
-
'Twilight Breaking Dawn Part 2': Edward, Bella And Jacob Character Posters (PHOTOS)
Russell Crowe, Elvis Costello, Sing Elvis Presley And Johnny Cash In London
'Men In Black 3' Unscripted: Josh Brolin Doesn't Know Will Smith's Song 'Summertime'
-
Catherine McKenzie: The Bachelorette Games
'Idol' Continues Downward Ratings Spiral
'Idol' Winner Inspires Nation After Enduring 8 Surgeries During Season
-
'SYTYCD' Season 9 premiere: Shafeek Westbrook wows the judges
'X Factor': Britney Spears and Demi Lovato face off over contestant
'Law & Order: SVU' cliffhanger: EP Warren Leight on what's next for Cragen and the squad
-
Critics Consensus: Men in Black III Is Solid Fun
Five Favorite Films with Director-Producer Oren Peli
Cannes 2012: Critics Scorecard
-
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Thursday, May 24, 2012
The Telefile - Modern Family: Best Lines of the Season 3 Finale
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Wednesday, May 23, 2012
-
'Dark Knight Rises' TV Spots: A Lighter Side Of Batman
Emma Stone Nabs First 'MTV Trailblazer Award'
One Direction Hit 'MIB 3' Premiere Armed With Toy Guns
-
Gateways To Geekery: There’s more to Russ Meyer’s films than breasts, though those are pretty important
Interview: Men In Black 3 director Barry Sonnenfeld on creating character and managing 3-D
The Walkthrough: 30 Rock showrunner Robert Carlock walks us through some recent series highlights
About This Blog
All through his childhood, Alan Sepinwall's relatives told his parents, "All that boy does is watch television! How's he going to make a living doing that?" His career as a TV critic has been 15 years and counting of his attempt to answer their concerns. "What's Alan Watching" is a blog whose title is self-explanatory: Alan watches TV shows, then writes about what he watched. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching
HitFix Poll
Will you still watch Community without Dan Harmon behind it?
Latest Posts
-
What would he have done differently? And what did the finale mean?Thursday, May 24, 2012
-
Our summer rewind will take us into season 2 of 'Deadwood'Thursday, May 24, 2012
-
Danny Masterson and friends don't do much of interest in Breckin Meyer-created sitcomWednesday, May 23, 2012
-
Celebrate the finale's anniversary with Jack, Sawyer, Hurley and friendsWednesday, May 23, 2012

Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup- 1
- 2
Next 136 Commentsmike
October 10, 2011 at 2:27AM EST Reply to CommentAs someone who's loved this show from the very first shot of pants wafting in the air, I'm thrilled that there is an endpoint in place. I can't wait to see what Gilligan & Co. do when there is no more need for the restraint required to keep the story going.
Shannon S eaking of the pants...in season 1 episode 1 Walt wears the green button down shirt but has no pants, is frantic, and uncoordinated. In the last episode of this season he is wearing a green button down, with the pants, and is calm and calculated. Just an observation, may or may not be intended to see how far Walt/Heisenberg has actually come. It was Walt in the green button down without pants in season 1, episode 1 almost ready to end his life after crashing the RV. It was Heisenberg who was neatly dressed in his green button down in the last episode of season 4 stated he won.
October 10, 2011 at 8:14AM ESTShannon S ^^^ Speaking**** of the pants..
October 10, 2011 at 8:15AM ESTitsjustme I noticed the green shirt too. Usually Walt is in an orange, brown or gray/white shirt. My sense is the green symbolizes spring: rebirth.
October 10, 2011 at 9:20PM ESTHooked on BB
October 10, 2011 at 2:30AM EST Reply to CommentHe completely glossed over all of the problems with the cigarette, the pack, the number in the pack, Jesse not noticing anything wrong a good part of the day, the number he smoked, had left, etc.
Oh, well. Apparently no one involved is/was a regular smoker.
cgeye Y'know what? if he doesn't know the specifics, that's OK -- I was more concerned that they gave us those specifics, then expected us to believe them, than that they outlined the contours of the plan, and not much else.
October 10, 2011 at 3:33AM ESTThey've got the right to do that; I only hope that from future plotting, they create one hell of a flashback sequence, covering it.
Grifter As a former smoker, I can say that it got to a point where I didn't really think of how many I smoked and only paid attention, when the pack was new and empty.
October 10, 2011 at 4:20AM ESTAs for the ricin cig itself, pretty sure Huell just changed packs.
That is quite a minor thing, I have to say.
Answer Man Huel steals the pack. Removes the risen cigarette. Walks over to Jessy's car and puts the pack next to the drivers seat by the door or on the seat. I smoke and cigarettes fall out of my pocket like this from time to time. Or he puts them in the center console of the car. Anywhere in the car where they could easily have been left. # of cigs remains the same, as does brand and pack condition. Jessy, even if he doesn't remember leaving them there, has no reason to be suspicious and would forget about the issue after a moment anyway.
October 10, 2011 at 4:42AM ESTGuest But how did Huell get the pack BACK to Jesse?
October 10, 2011 at 4:45AM ESTAnd I'm sorry I just don't buy that Jesse was not borderline OCD about knowing at all times where the Ricin cig was...
Answer Man I just explained that.
October 10, 2011 at 4:48AM ESTGuest Whoops that posted seconds after you did Answer Man, but I still dispute your take on Huell putting them in his car.
October 10, 2011 at 4:48AM ESTJesse was always aware of where that cig was (considering it had a deadly poison in it and all) and would definitely be suspicious about it just randomly showing up in his car.
No, Jesse was always too aware of that cig, to allow random chance to happen, IMO. He even intimates as much to Walt when he first confronts him.
Col Bat Guano The thing is, the ricin cigarette wasn't even necessary. Everyone knows Gus is capable of poisoning people. There's an entire dead Mexican cartel who could testify to that. Just have Walt make the connection for Jesse at the house.
October 10, 2011 at 3:12PM ESTFlavia There certainly was some extreme serendipity to Walt's plan (that Jesse wouldn't go ahead and shoot him, that Gus would have just happened to have poisoned a large portion of the cartel leadership) not to mention the logistics of how Huell swapped the pack out and how Walt poisoned the kid are vague. Nevertheless, this show is so meticulously and brilliantly constructed and the reveal was so unsettling that I'm more than willing to let the specifics of exactly how Walt poisoned Brock slide. It was much better for not knowing that is where Walt had been when he disappeared from the storyline. It's an unusual choice to not only make the protagonist so dark but also to hide his actions from the viewer.
October 10, 2011 at 3:40PM ESTHooked on BB Answer Man, that scenario relies on even more on chance and Jesse being even dumber than he already must be for Walt's plan to work.
October 10, 2011 at 4:13PM ESTJesse already thought Huell lifted the pack from him when he confronted Walt. If he had found the pack in his car after visiting Saul when he thought he had it in a pocket he would be even more convinced that Huell lifted it, removed the cig, and put the pack in his car. Walt was barely able to convince him Huell did not lift the pack when he found it where it should be, in his pocket.
And if the pack was in his car when he thought it was in his pocket, why wouldn't he take a cig out and light up before putting the pack back in his pocket, where he thought it was? I almost certainly would do this when I was smoking. How could Walt/Huell/Saul count on Jesse not doing this or not noticing the ricin cig was gone if he did?
Grifter, when I smoked I always knew if I had an almost full, almost empty, or basically half full pack, even if I did not know exactly how many cigs were in it. Jesse knew the pack was full in the morning and I am sure he had a good idea how many he smoked during the day.
rtr75
October 10, 2011 at 2:33AM EST Reply to CommentWow...Saul didn't poison the kid, Walt did. Even dumber. How is that possible? Where was Andrea? Why did Brock take food from a stranger? Where was this? How did Walt know where they lived? Sigh. This is gonna bug me...
Fronk Well who's to say Saul DIDN'T poison him? Walt supplies the poison; Saul delivers it. Also, Walt DID know where Andrea lived. Walt confronted Jesse at her house, right before he got tasered and dragged to the desert. I'm sure he got the address, in the first place, from Saul. Saul dropped money off to her at least once on screen, and many other times it was implied.
October 10, 2011 at 4:02AM ESTBut yeah, it still leaves way too much unexplained for my taste. Showing SO little, in regards to poison-gate, was definitely this show stringing us along.
Grifter It's simple. Saul tells Walt where they live, given that he knows. Walt follows them from Jesse's home. Saul gets a goon to break-in and poison some specific food for breakfast that the kid eats. Or Walt does this himself when everyone is sleeping...because you know...truly doubt Brock would take something from a stranger. Walt avoids two goons in his house, so why can't he slip into a house at night and slip something into some cereal, milk, whatever?
October 10, 2011 at 4:24AM ESTFronk Did Walt have the time to pull that off though? If he had been working that long con for days (instead of the hours the show seemed to be implying) shouldn't we still, as an audience, as an audience, considering we spend nearly the entire show from Walt's narrative point of view, be let in on ANY of those incidents?
October 10, 2011 at 4:52AM ESTJay V "Walt confronted Jesse at her house, right before he got tasered and dragged to the desert"
October 10, 2011 at 9:00AM ESTFALSE. That was at Jesse's house. Andrea & Brock were visiting.
JamesG @ Fronk: "so why can't he slip into a house at night and slip something into some cereal, milk, whatever? "
October 10, 2011 at 9:12AM ESTBecause the whole sequence occurs in less than half a day. Crawl Space begins, Walt realizes they don't have the money, the DEA takes away Skylar, Walt wastes time by the pool... He THEN comes up with this scheme and executes it within half a day, as Jesse gets home and gets the call of the poisoning that same night, just after dark.
Again, this is just sloppy writing. There is no reason the show needed to restrict Walt to only a few hours. This was a deliberate choice that could have been partly fixed by giving him an extra day, or by creating a less complicated scheme.
berkowit28 In the episode thread, a few people noticed that the document that Saul's secretary was shredding was a school schedule. So one of Saul's men got to Brock at school - maybe got something into his lunch box in his backpack or locker. Maybe we'll find out at some point.
October 10, 2011 at 11:30AM ESTRocket There was a commenter on the epidose review page that claims that 'honey tits' was shredding what looked to be a class schedule, which, if true, would indicate that the poisoning was done at school.
October 10, 2011 at 11:45AM ESTIt still doesn't explain exactly how that worked. did they gain entrance to the school and break into his locker where his brown bag lunch would be? Is Brock on a school lunch program where the school provides the lunch and somehow his lunch got poisoned that way.
And most importantly, it doesn't explain the poisoning as as accident. When Brock recovers, he will claim that he didn't eat any berries. The investigators wouldn't simply ignore Brock's story, would they? They'd have to keep digging.
Ricin Cigarette Thanks to those who noticed the school schedule shredding. So that's how Brock got poisoned. If Walt can't make it seem like Brock ate the berries, Jesse will figure out next season that Walt poisoned him.
October 10, 2011 at 1:55PM ESTFlavia I assume at some point Jesse will have to learn the truth about Walt but just because Gus didn't poison the kid with ricin, it doesn't mean Gus didn't poison the kid (from Jesse's perspective.) Given that things have a way of circling back around in that universe, Walt had better be getting rid of that plant.
October 10, 2011 at 3:48PM ESTJames G
October 10, 2011 at 2:46AM EST Reply to CommentThe answers to the second and third questions really annoy me. Why would Gilligan craft the plot like that with so many intention holes that even now don't really have an answer? There are many ways he could have achieved the same effect without the convoluted plot involving the cigarette. This, sadly, takes away from his main point, which is the continued moral degradation of Walt. This just seems out of place on a show that has had near-perfect execution on past seasons.
Yep, exactly. They needed to scrap this whole plan and come up with something better, something that didn't require us to go through all these gymnastics just to not feel cheated.
October 10, 2011 at 2:52AM ESTGrifter I completely disagree.
October 10, 2011 at 4:36AM ESTIt really doesn't take it away from the main plot of the moral degradation of Walt. It showcases it on deeper, far horrible levels.
As for the cig. Iunno. I dismissed the idea of it actually being the ricin cig after some thinking. Neither Gus or Walt would risk getting the cops attention onto Jesse, if Brock was actually lethally poisoned and die from ricin. It felt, to me more, like a either something random that happened to the kid with spectacular timing given all that was going on...or non-lethal poisoning, either by Gus or Walt, to pull, brilliantly, Jesse towards their respective "team".
To me it works and fits together nicely.
All the exposure isn't necessary, sincerely...but I enjoy trying to figure things out.
Guest How does it showcase it on a deeper, far horrible level though?
October 10, 2011 at 4:56AM ESTI think what the OP is saying is that they could have achieved this level of moral degradation WITHOUT resorting to the convoluted poison plan.
Like he says, GILLIGAN isn't even sure what happened.
ABC Couple points: VG talks about wanting to build a deep story. The ricin cigarette had been there most of the season, so I can see why he wanted it to play a big role in the culminating act of the season. That said, it does pose some problems and I'm thinking Jesse should be alarmed if something else poisoned Brock but his ricin cig still disappeared.
October 10, 2011 at 5:30AM ESTI'm willing to let it slide and give the benefit of the doubt to believe Walt could find a way to slip him the berries, he has a window where he is out of the episode last week so he has a time frame to do it. I think saul was in on switching the packs and possibly telling Walt how to get to Brock but I would bet Walt didn't let him in on the full extent of the plot, or at least he did not have to. VG says that Walt got the poison to Brock.
If you let some of the logistical stuff slide though, it really does work well on a lot of levels: Walt found a way to get Jesse back on his side through pure manipulation, including playing off the fact that Gus has hurt a child in the past. That Walt did it fits perfectly with the show and makes much more sense than Gus doing it and somehow feels more satisfying than if it was all an accident.
Brendon I guess you'd better stop watching the show, then. That should make you feel better.
October 11, 2011 at 3:02AM ESTsam_hough
October 10, 2011 at 2:46AM EST Reply to CommentI don't really have a problem with the infamous cigarette. As a former smoker, I could see Jesse getting caught up and not noticing it until later.
As for the timeline with Walt, I figured it was something as simple as Andrea was at work, left a plate for Brock to heat up in the microwave, and Walter put the berries in his mashed potatoes. I love Breaking Bad enough that I can make excuses for it.
Linda B. I think that Brock is too young to be left alone to microwave his own dinner.
October 10, 2011 at 3:26AM ESTI believed that Saul brought a treat for Brock when he delivered Andrea's support check. Now, VG says it was Walt who delivered the poison to Brock. I really would like to know how Walt accomplished that.
Also, even though the police may be satisfied that Brock's poisoning was accidental, Brock is old enough to be able to tell his mother what he ate. And surely Andrea will be suspicious about how Brock came in contact with Lily of the Valley.
Fronk Whoa, Walt broke into the house, stealthily put berries into his mash potatoes, and exited without anybody noticing? Was this more or less stealthy than how he got into Saul's office in tonights ep?
October 10, 2011 at 3:43AM ESTSorry, that was just too big a plot point to be left without a single scene of exposition...
Scoot Well, then, wait for the next season opener. Maybe they'll show every last detail then.
October 10, 2011 at 9:18AM ESTberkowit28 I just mentioned - late coming to an earlier question above - that some people in the episode thread noticed that the document that Saul's secretary was shredding was a school schedule. So one of Saul's men got to Brock at school - maybe got something into his lunch box in his backpack or locker. Maybe we'll find out at some point.
October 10, 2011 at 11:33AM ESTIreneinidaho Not only is Brock too young to be left home alone, I think his grandma watches him when Andrea is gone. So if Saul or whoever came to the house and gave Brock something to eat just before he got sick, wouldn't she be asking questions about that, or mention it to the doctors?
October 10, 2011 at 12:38PM ESTAnthony Olson
October 10, 2011 at 2:49AM EST Reply to CommentIt sounds like Vince forgot... I'm going with the candies delivered by Saul as long as they were after Walt had his idea. Otherwise, what was the point f the candies?
What candies?
October 10, 2011 at 2:53AM ESTJack
October 10, 2011 at 3:02AM EST Reply to CommentWalter White is not like Tony Montana, Tony Soprano, or any other TV series/movie with an amorale protagonist. The writers/Bryan Cranston have somehow created a main character that garners no sympathy, yet you can't take your eyes off of him. It's unprecedented. Usually a main character can create sympathy just by being the main character. I feel it's natural for people to root for the guy whose story they are watching unfold. Personally, I can find empathy that I didn't even know I had for a person doing horrible things just because they are the main character. I don't think I'm in the minority when I say I have no sympathy for Walter White. For everything he's done, he deserves to die. I hate the Walter White as if he were a virus. Yet, I love his story.
ABC Yeah I agree and think Bryan Cranston has a lot to do with it. He has been a villain since somewhere in season 2 for me (blowing off birth of child to make meth deal) but Cranston is so good you still kind of root for the guy even if you know you shouldn't
October 10, 2011 at 5:36AM ESTTim
October 10, 2011 at 3:17AM EST Reply to CommentPrediction: the final season pits Jesse against Walt, with them headed for a similar faceoff. however, Jesse's journey will be toward "breaking good" and will not kill Walt, who will ultimately meet his demise at the hands of his original death sentence: cancer.
Remy Yes and Walt will be dying in a bed totally alone, having lost all connections to everyone (his wife, son, Hank, Marie) and having lost his humanity. By the end we will just be ecstatic that he is going to die. What an evil bastard he has become.
October 10, 2011 at 5:12AM ESTSexy Saul SNAP Tim!
October 10, 2011 at 7:40AM ESTRufus Jones
October 10, 2011 at 3:17AM EST Reply to CommentI don't mind being lied to, but I really detest a bad liar. I'm being asked to believe that Huell-- who has been depicted in every appearance as slow (both physically and mentally), clumsy and incompetent to the point where pretty much everyone assumed he was just there to provide comic relief-- somehow managed to pull of this slick finagle.
Also, Walt told Saul that he needed that cigarette to be stolen. And Saul told Huell to get it.
And I guess neither Saul nor Huell asked any questions-- and Walt didn't feel it was problematic to have his evil plan hinge upon the actions of two guys.
Plus I don't think the timeline works. And this is such a transparent shuck that it isn't even worth my time to nail it to the ground.
This interview plays like the scene in PEE WEE's BIG ADVENTURE where Paul Reubens goes riding on his bike, collides with something, and falls bum over teakettle, rolling until he lands just before a group of kids.
Reubens gets up, brushes himself off and says "I meant to do that." I thought that was hysterical-- especially since I've seen my roommate's cat do pretty much the same thing (do something incredibly clumsy and then get up and preen with offended dignity).
Gilligan can say "I meant to do that", but it plays like he and the staff simply wrote themselves into a corner and came up with a clumsy rationale for the multiple cheats they used to find a way out.
The good news is that people who prefer THE WIRE don't have to argue about which show was the greatest show ever any longer. Nor do the MAD MEN enthusiasts have to fight about who the best-written show currently airing is. There have been some crackerjack scenes and moments-- which work fine if you enjoy them and not worry about whether they fit into the context. But, all in all, this season has been a soapy, disjointed mess.
Linda B. Until proven otherwise, I will continue to hail The Wire as the greatest show ever.
October 10, 2011 at 3:39AM ESTAs to Mad Men vs. Breaking Bad, I was reserving judgement until the shows ended. That was until I discovered the 6 year Mad Men timeline discrepancy. Any flaws that Breaking Bad may have, do not compare with that flagrant writing error.
I just want to say, I disagree with your complaints and with the assumption The Wire never made mistakes. At least Breaking Bad hasn't ruined an entire season yet(S5 of the wire was terrible). Also, there wasn't a single performance on The Wire that matches Cranston's or Paul's and BB is a much better looking show(although part of that is location).
October 10, 2011 at 4:45AM ESTechos myron Certain plots of The Wire which lasted for the entire run of the show were horrible. McNulty vs. his wife, for instance. Or anything involving Snoop. Also, Simon is hardly what you could call a subtle writer. He`s basically John Grisham with more sympathy for minorities.
October 10, 2011 at 4:20PM ESTAnnie "And I guess neither Saul nor Huell asked any questions-- and Walt didn't feel it was problematic to have his evil plan hinge upon the actions of two guys."
October 10, 2011 at 10:06PM ESTYou're forgetting how badly Saul wants to live. Stealing the cigarettes was beneficial to both Walt and Saul.
Nicole So, are you going to keep watching a show you no longer like?
October 11, 2011 at 2:00PM ESTBobo One kinda-vague plot point and suddenly the show is a mess? Just because this is the internet doesn't mean we have to be as hyperbolic as possible.
October 11, 2011 at 9:45PM ESTZeus
October 10, 2011 at 3:54AM EST Reply to Comment(I posted this on Alan's original review, but it seems more appropriate here)
I'm really disappointed with Vince Gilligan in regards to the Huell/cigarette explanation. It either says:
1) We couldn't find a way to show this without it exposing our cheat, so we just opted not to address it at all, and instead explain it later in a throw away, after-the-fact, interview.
or
2) I just made up that explanation on the spot.
Either way, it screws with what is, or isn't, canon on the show. I wish Vince would have just left it up in the air regarding how it happened, instead of this limp pseudo-explanation.
It reminds me of the annoying garbage that Lost tried to pull in regards to the Numbers; we should just accept what some alternate reality game that nobody played tell us about what seemed to be a pivotal plot point? Really?
How about we just expect the creative teams to tell their stories ON THE SCREEN...?
sufur The numbers were explicitly explained on Lost as corresponding to the Candidates. Huell stealing the cig is explicit in the text of Breaking Bad.
October 10, 2011 at 5:31AM ESTFURUS Not to turn this into a Lost debate, but that doesn't even scratch the surface of the numbers appearance the other 500 times they appeared in various places/guises on the show.
October 10, 2011 at 10:56AM ESTsufur Yeah well Lost did a horrible job with the answers they gave in the last season but they were given.
October 10, 2011 at 2:56PM ESTAnoel
October 10, 2011 at 3:55AM EST Reply to Comment"the darker Walt goes, the more chance he has of competing on a level playing field with Gustavo Fring"
I think it's the less emotional Walt gets, the less attached he is to being strictly good and the more he thinks about what's practical and how he can get his ends accomplished, the easier it'll happen that his plans actually work. I always thought Walt's biggest weakness as a true leader was his tendency to get stubborn and emotional...but it seems he's at least losing some of the latter.
Reading this does make me a little sad that everything wasn't planned out further in advance. The truly Great shows (not that this isn't but it could be more) for me are the ones who plan their seasons from the very beginning and put layer upon layer until you reach the very end and everything that happened makes total sense with what came before. Of course given TV realities not to mention talent wise, that's very hard to do but I do hope more showrunners in the future will try to do this more. That being said, there are few shows that they would be better to look to than Breaking Bad and the narrative has been incredibly beautiful this season, tiny issues aside. Thanks for a great season Vince and the rest of the Breaking Bad writers!
Mr. Burgundy
October 10, 2011 at 4:05AM EST Reply to CommentBetween the highly implausible "Gus somehow poisons an entire Mexican cartel via spiked alcohol" and "Walt somehow poisons a little boy via spiked [INSERT SPECULATION HERE]", I think Breaking Bad would do well by not poisoning anybody next season.
Just sit the next few plays out Champ...
carey_adams
October 10, 2011 at 4:30AM EST Reply to CommentI just don't understand how so many people are nit-picking the last two episodes about the missing cigarette and berry poisoning. These last two episodes were phenomenal television. Allow yourselves to enjoy it without the silly over analyzing.
Rufus Nit picking? Silly?
October 10, 2011 at 4:41AM ESTThe chain of events that got Jesse to trust Walt and turn his back on Gus, (don't forget they spent an entire season bonding Jesse and Gus) was a huge development that NEEDED to be analyzed, otherwise it just feels like the writers can pull off whatever they want with their character's motivations.
The fact that the plan was SO convoluted means its even more ripe for analyzing.
Sufur The plan was not convoluted. Step 1. Remove the ricin cig from the equation. Step 2. Poison the kid by means unknown off camera. Step 3. Sell Jesse on Gus being the culprit. What's so difficult to believe here?
October 10, 2011 at 5:27AM ESTVisor I completely agree. Nitpicking is exactly what it is. This episode was amazing, but it seems like people would rather find SOMETHING wrong than enjoy great writing.
October 10, 2011 at 6:53AM ESTjcpdiesel21 Agreed. The outrage is ridiculous. I am willing to let a minor plot hole go in exchange for this incredible show. And I don't find his answers to Alan's questions to be evasive, either. Part of the fun is not knowing exactly what happened by th letter and filling in the missing pieces yourself.
October 10, 2011 at 10:34AM ESTRufus I was never saying the episode WASN'T amazing. You can still have an amazing episode with plot holes/inconsistencies.
October 10, 2011 at 10:59AM ESTI just think its a silly argument that we shouldn't over analyze the plot strings (which still don't add up to me) that led to all of the dominoes falling after 13(?) episodes of an incredible show.
Cody A lot of why I watch the show is because it is believable. If Walter developed super powers that let him fly and beat up bad guys it would greatly diminish the quality of the show (extreme example).The cast and the producers want you to believe that it is really happening. When something happens that's not believable it takes away from its greatness.
October 10, 2011 at 5:51PM ESTThat being said, I think the plan to kill the kid is out there, but I do think I think it is plausible.
The Cartel dying is way less believable than Walter being able to poison the kid.
People like to give excuses when their favorite show doesn't deliver every episode. This is sad because not everything Breaking Bad did this season was amazing.
Finally, still not buying Gus's hyper sense of awareness in the parking garage. I laughed when I saw that scene. It's just so unnecessary.
Rahul, India
October 10, 2011 at 4:38AM EST Reply to CommentHey you know what Alan?
Great interview!
Crazy Eyes Killa
October 10, 2011 at 5:19AM EST Reply to CommentI don't usually read comments and missed this entire debate. I'm stunned that people are nitpicking this very plausible stuff and not a word is said on Gus the Two Face Terminator.
So true! Forget cigarettes, berries, and time frames. How about a man with half a face straightening his tie!
October 11, 2011 at 10:37AM ESTjohnsteinbeck thank you, people!
October 13, 2011 at 10:44AM ESTi thought it was a very odd artistic choice but decided to let it slip, because the story telling was good. i saw the bell and the bomb coming and loved it. but god, the two face bit was stupid.
ryanw
October 10, 2011 at 5:19AM EST Reply to Commentstill shocked that walt actually did it. if it ended today it would work, they can't cook anymore
Jonah
October 10, 2011 at 5:53AM EST Reply to CommentPersonal message to Vince Gilligan: Please ignore all the cynics and haters out there. You've made one of the best TV shows of all time, ever! It will go down in history as spectacular and this season lives up to the rest. Still going strong! Just ignore all the comments from people obsessing over minutiae of the show.
I, for one, had chills when I saw the Lily of the Desert in the last scene. My thought wasn't "how did Walt do it?" but "what an evil bastard!" I didn't even consider that it could possibly be "poor writing" as others on this website have stated. To me, it's that people are demanding everything to be spelled out. But you saved the biggest impact for last. You would either have to end on Gus and Tio, or with the Lily of the Desert, to have a big impact. And I'm glad you ended with the Lily of the Desert because it was a much more chilling, darker "reveal" instead of a cliffhanger. In fact it reminded me more of The Wire in that they didn't use cliffhangers as much as dark reveals at the end of their shows. (Finding bodies in the crate in S02E01 for instance). I am a huge fan of this technique.
Sorry to ramble, I just had to say something because I was reading page after page of people obsessing over "Ricin cigarette this" and "planned or unplanned" that. I found it funny that someone wrote a comment that it seemed you had written yourself into a corner and had to write a way out of it. Isn't that a good thing? Like writing Walt & Jesse into the RV with Hank outside? Continually writing yourself into corners challenges you to actually take a risk to get out of it. It's like raising the stakes. You take a big risk (that you might not be able to write your way out of the corner) for a big payoff.
Planning everything in advance is so safe. I feel like your show continues to surprise me because you're writing surprising elements even to yourselves. It's like improvisation. You don't start with a finished product, how boring. You start with a devilishly perilous situation and use your wit to find a way out of it.
I've also been picking up on all the meta stuff like Walt & Skyler going over their script to present to Hank & Marie, exactly as actors/writers would do in real life. And the meta level of constantly urging the audience to "write" their own solution. Like "how good of a solution can you write?" Even in this final episode of the season, Walt urging Jesse to think, where is Gus weak? That is so meta and so clever. I love it!
Great work! And kudos on another excellent season.
JanieJones I have to agree, Jonah. I think VG wants the viewer to think for themselves. However, I would have preferred not see the plant in the ending shot.
October 10, 2011 at 8:12AM ESTI think Gilligan and co. have done a magnificent job. I'm very curious to see how S5/6 go.
Alan, thanks for a great interview.
Jimmbo That final shot works well for a series closer, though arguably less well for a season closer. And VG said he was trying to tie up like a season closer.
October 10, 2011 at 10:29AM ESTWhich was the correct decision, IMO. There are times for tension and times for release. The past two or three eps were among the most grueling in tv history, plus we were handed that huge cliffhanger to cope with at the last (very long) season break.
This decision of a hard stop and full clean-up was appropriate. I'm left feeling good, though certainly looking forward to next season. And Walt, who has crossed a major rubicon, is ready to begin a whole new phase.
belinda
October 10, 2011 at 6:08AM EST Reply to CommentYay, interview with Gilligan!! I want to hug all the writers for a great, great S4.
I didn't catch Chekhov's Lily of the Valley in the previous episode, thanks for pointing that out.
Oh, and superlab, RIP. I'm still insanely jealous of the critics who were able to hang out in there..and now it's gone.
(And re: earlier post. I'm a regular smoker, and nope, unless a full pack of cigs was switched with a near empty one (or vice versa), I would never think it's been switched. I mean, it'll be different if Jesse was trying to quit - that's when you count them. So I can buy that tiny leap.)
Sexy Saul
October 10, 2011 at 7:31AM EST Reply to CommentGreat interview. Excellent questions. My only gripe is Gilligan's glossing over the detail of how Walt got the berry to Brock. You can't reasonably gloss over a detail of this magnitude when this show is all about the details. I struggle to understand how - when the writers are satisfied if they can "play a very deep game" - they went light on this key moment.
Sexy Saul
October 10, 2011 at 7:32AM EST Reply to CommentGreat interview. Excellent questions. My only gripe is Gilligan's glossing over the detail of how Walt got the berry to Brock. You can't reasonably gloss over a detail of this magnitude when this show is all about the details. I struggle to understand how - when the writers are satisfied if they can "play a very deep game" - they went light on this key moment.
Madel People seem to be missing the obvious with this gripe about getting the poison to Brock:
October 10, 2011 at 9:05AM ESTThis is going to be a HUGE plot thread in the coming 16 episodes - WHEN and HOW Jesse finds out about it - and what happens between Walt and him when he does. This is bound to be one of the main conflicts leading to the end of the series.
Gilligan doesn't want to come out and say this directly (since it would be tantamount, for some people, to spoilers), and it's quite possible that the writers haven't worked out the exact details yet: Did Saul help? If so, how much? Would Saul tell Jesse? Would he tell Mike? Etc, etc. But they have worked out enough to know it's POSSIBLE - and that's all they needed to have done for now.
But I have no doubt whatsoever that the details will be filled-in, as we need to know them, in order to drive the grand story to it's conclusion.
So please, enjoy this great 2-part finale and don't worry. You will get the rest of the info later - as Jesse starts to discover it.
Jimmbo "You will get the rest of the info later - as Jesse starts to discover it."
October 10, 2011 at 10:31AM ESTYep. Even right now, as he drives home, he's racking his brain over where that darn cigarette went to! So it's not just us!
Chad Madel, you beat me to it. I agree.
October 10, 2011 at 10:56AM ESTChad Madel, you beat me to it. I agree.
October 10, 2011 at 10:56AM ESTMadel @Chad - Thank you, sir. You are a scholar and a gentleman. ;)
October 10, 2011 at 11:01AM ESTTruck "But they have worked out enough to know it's POSSIBLE - and that's all they needed to have done for now."
October 10, 2011 at 12:28PM EST1) They achieved this in an unfair manner, or at the very least a manner they are not accustomed to utilizing, by not showing it from Walt's POV.
2) I don't think you should destroy a season long story arch (Jesse bonding w/ Gus & Mike over Walt) in such a wishy-washy way. If you've spent hours building that relationship with carefully plotted scenes, only to sweep it away in a barely reasoned, pseudo-explanation, then it comes off as a problem to me.
They can easily expand it out next season, like you've stated, and in the process make everything completely plausible. Regardless, it wouldn't assuage my annoyances with THIS season, in the moment.
Having said that were talking about annoyances that brought it from a 10/10, to a 9.5/10. Still brilliant TV.
Madel @Truck
October 10, 2011 at 1:26PM EST1) I personally didn't feel it was unfair... I thought it was nicely written as a slow and subtle reveal of the depths to which Walter has now sunk. But I suppose how you feel about it may have to do with how you got the information.
When I first watched 'End Times', I believed Walt - but I had a strange sensation that I couldn't put my finger on. Afterwards I thought about it - and it seemed that Walt's argument to Jesse just didn't make sense - so I re-watched it a second time and then saw the clues they had put there to show you that Walt was likely behind the poisoning. So the reveal in 'Face Off' was no surprise.
2) I don't think that story arc (Jesse bonding with Mike) has been destroyed (or is even finished) at all. From the NY Times interview with Gilligan:
Q. Given that Walt and Jesse know even less about Gus, and don’t know why he was so important that the cartel could not kill him, could their assassination of him come back to haunt them?
A. That’s a good question. We will be getting into that when the writers’ room reopens in November. But I can think of one gentleman who may have a problem with it, who’s a bit closer to home, who is Mike, played by Jonathan Banks. [laughs heartily] Mike may have a problem with what transpired, and I wouldn’t want Mike mad at me, I can tell you that.
Dee Dee MADEL, thank you and thank you again.
October 11, 2011 at 4:16AM ESTI've tried to be patient to everyone calling anything about this show "sloppy writing". I'm a successful writer, editor, copy editor who works with words and stories for a living (and as anyone who has written fiction probably knows, making enough money doing so these days, enough to more or less break even, is no easy task, even with over a decades of experience and excellent references). I know sloppy writing when I see it (and when I write it myself) and sloppy storytelling when I see it. I have yet to see anything resembling sloppy ANYTHING, let alone writing, on this show, and I hold BrBa to a pretty high standard.
Anyway, reading reactions over the past 24+ hours, I've tried to just be philosophical about viewers complaining that the finale was "totally predictable" and "way, way too over-the-top". I've tried to take the attitude that the finale was their loss, because they didn't have as fantastic of a viewing experience as I did ...but before I read your responses I was thisclose to snapping and typing a post that'd probably be so rude (and sloppy-didn't say I was a perfect wordsmith when I post comments) and swear so much my post would be deleted. Thanks for being patient and putting out such a well-worded, thoughtful response I agree 100% with your replies/explanations.
It's too bad this brilliant, intense, jaw-dropping season seemed to bring out the worst in some people. I'm still trying to figure out how/why that happened. Thanks again! Word.
Frank S
October 10, 2011 at 10:10AM EST Reply to CommentI noticed there were no questions about the plausibility of Gus's over-the-top death scene. He has his head blown off and is able to stand up, walk into the hallway, adjust his tie, then die on cue? That seemed ridiculous and way out of place for me on a show like this. The poisoning plot holes can at least be explained away in some understandable fashion, but I found this completely unrealistic and much harder to simply dismiss as a suspension of disbelief. It might fit into The Dark Knight or sci-fi action film, but it stands out on a show that has gone to meticulous lengths to be realistic in the past.
Jimmbo I'd have preferred if Gus was further away from the chair. He was blocked way too close to the bomb for that result to be believable. As-is, it was the single broadest thing in BB history. It made Ted's death look positively realistic.
October 10, 2011 at 10:34AM ESTMadel I could agree with you if the Cousins had never been introduced last season - but since they were, I'm afraid your argument doesn't really hold water. Even before that (S2), the airplane collision (virtually directly over Walter's house) was a bit if a stretch.
October 10, 2011 at 10:44AM ESTI've never been a fan of the above-mentioned, over-the-top plot devices, but I've come to accept it as part of Gilligan's vision: even as he chronicles SOME things at a highly realistic and uncomfortable level (the immoral justifications of - and fallout from - this one man's prideful and arrogant mistakes), other events and elements are added as service of (and homage to) crime / gangster / western fiction from the past.
Or, to put it another way, VG & Co. include all of the gratifying, seductive elements of these genres - wrapped up in a bow of sadness and real pain.
chairthrower I must say, instead of it being the dramatic, final scene that it should have been, it came off looking a bit cartoonish and certainly reminiscent of "The Dark Knight". However, it's probably not completely implausible. Gus noticed a second before it went off and was probably ducking away as quick as he could. Clearly, he was turning around to head out when the bomb went off, and may have moved away a few feet, which would have made a big difference, especially since it was clear Hector took the brunt of the explosion--he was completely gone. The amount of damage done to Gus would have had him in complete shock, but that would mean he wouldn't feel the pain, and probably would have tried to do exactly what he did considering his personality. So while it seems implausible, it's probably at least remotely possible, and probably no more implausible than the fact that Gus was still alive and not under DEA suspicion after all these years.
October 10, 2011 at 11:22AM ESTIreneinidaho I agree with Frank. When I saw Gus walk out, I thought WOW! the guy really does have superpowers! Then when I saw the other side of his face, I broke out laughing. It was so implausible that he could be perfect and neat on one side and looking worse than the Walking Dead on the other. In fact, I think they must have hired makeup/special effects people from TWD and told them to do the most outrageous thing they could think of, something that would be too bizarre even for TWD. (Although I don't watch TWD, so maybe that's par for the course there.) Most ridiculous and unsatisfying part of the episode.
October 10, 2011 at 12:30PM ESTJimmbo Yeah, good, Irene. Good point. It didn't play very horrifying/Dark Knight. It was actually kind of funny. Plus it showed (intentionally heavily-handedly) the two-facedness of Gus. I think it should be viewed that way, as a leitmotif and a caprice, ala ShovelCam.
October 10, 2011 at 12:38PM ESTThe anticlimax was a great touch in such a climactic series. After a few grueling episodes, that scene actually felt pretty light. And VG intended it that way. Consider how non-tense he made Gus' walk from car into the home, as if to say "you all know what's going to happen". Then he played with it. And this special effect thingee was just the culmination of that playing.
Jay I like over-the-top. Two face Gus was my absolute favorite part of the episode. That's just me though. Different strokes for different folks.
October 10, 2011 at 1:29PM ESTI think that Walt blowing up Tuco's office with a fake piece of meth while remaining alive (not even injured) falls into that same category. But I still enjoyed that scene as well. It's a fictional show. I don't mind the occasional implausible scenario.
Gus has half his face blown off, and his first priority is to walk out and fix his tie. All his careful mannerisms still intact. And THEN he decides to die. That was brilliant to me. I loved it.
jcpdiesel21 Oh, come on. That was the most awesome/terrifying thing about this episode! Realism be damned.
October 10, 2011 at 1:33PM ESTRicin Cigarette In the NY Times Arts Beat interview with Gilligan, he says The Walking Dead prosthetic effects people helped with Gus's death scene, along with digital effects, and it took months. I'd like a doctor to weigh in on whether Gus could walk. But I loved that scene. I was yelling OMG OMG OMG! It is iconic, like Tortuga's head on the tortoise.
October 10, 2011 at 2:20PM ESTReceuvium There've been cases of people in schock walking on a broken leg. It wasn't completely implausible, but I think it would've been more effective if they'd shown Gus slumped in a corner instead, and given him a bit longer to die. I found the way they did it sadly anticlimactic and the only thing 'missing' in the episode.
October 10, 2011 at 3:49PM ESTmilo1 Haven't you heard of metaphors? Chickens can run with their heads cut off. Chicken Man can walk with half his head blown off.
October 14, 2011 at 12:17PM ESTErnie
October 10, 2011 at 10:21AM EST Reply to CommentI thought Skyler changed the locks on the White house. Did the neighbor get the new locks and Walt knew about it?
Also this is the first season ender without a cliffhanger of any kind. Almost feels like someone else was writing it.
Ricin Cigarette Gilligan says in an interview that it was done before they knew the show got another year, so it was written as a series finale.
October 10, 2011 at 2:21PM ESTRob I thought they left a tiny cliffhanger when they showed that Gus' station wagon was still there at the hospital. Surely, if Hank finds out about that he will also find out that Jesse was at the hospital, too, and the game will once again be afoot, so to speak.
October 10, 2011 at 3:36PM ESTsean Hank already knows Jesse is connected to Heisenberg/Fring, and Fring is on the board of the hospital, so it doesn't seem like much of a significant step forward for Hank.
October 11, 2011 at 4:39AM ESTChad
October 10, 2011 at 10:54AM EST Reply to CommentHas anyone thought that perhaps VG is playing a long game with us as the viewer?
I started thinking that Brock is eventually going to talk. VG might be reserving the explanation for when Brock tells his mom/Jesse/etc what happened. Hell, he could open next season with a flashback that details exactly what Walt was up to in the time we didn't see him. I think we should all relax and bask in the awesomeness that was last night's episode. At least chill until the next season comes back to see if we get any details. Remember the flashback to how Jesse got the RV and that was what...2 seasons after the fact? BB has earned a tad more of our trust IMO.
James G I expect that the BB staff will probably hear these criticisms and do something along the lines of what you're saying. I wouldn't even be surprised if season 5 starts with Jess/Andrea/Brock returning home from the hospital and the camera panning on his lunch box with the tainted snack.
October 10, 2011 at 11:21AM ESTBut why is this necessary? If you look at the season 3 finale, they were able to execute a complex scheme masterfully and didn't need any flashbacks to make it plausible in hindsight. THAT was fantastic execution. To me, this season finale's issues are just bad storytelling.
chairthrower Brock may be in fact Walter's ticking time bomb--once we know the story of how Walter poisoned him (did he slip the berries in his PB&J? Leave them in a bowl of fruit?) But I think this is going to be significant in the final episodes.
October 10, 2011 at 11:28AM ESTThe whole Lily of the Valley issue is an intriguing one. It's not native to New Mexico, and clearly the Whites bought it as part of their landscaping. How did Walter know of its toxicity? He's never had an interest in plants before.
Jimmbo But I'm quite sure Walt didn't go over and say "here, have some berries, little boy". He was aware he needed to do this in a way so Brock wouldn't have useful data to offer Jesse, and there were certainly ways to accomplish that.
October 10, 2011 at 12:00PM ESTThe real problem for Walt is Jesse latching on to the dangling string of the missing cigarette. Which he surely did during the ride home.
One more related comment: there were no witnesses to Jane's death. We've been waiting for quite some time for Jesse to "find out", but it just ain't gonna happen. However, as VG says, the Brock episode is far worse from Jesse's standpoint, because Brock's a complete innocent. So let's forget Jane. The conflict for Season 5 is clearly set up, and starts brewing about 45 secs after the credits rolled on this episode, as Jesse drove home, thinking "Wait a sec......"
Jimmbo Chairthrower - it's not native to NM, but it's a very popular potted plant. Walt would be far from the only owner. And as for his plant knowledge, one of the central premises of the series, that we just have to accept, is that Walt's brilliant on science, period. I actually have friends like that, so it's not such a stretch for me.
October 10, 2011 at 12:02PM ESTGuest Another large threat hanging over Walt's head:
October 10, 2011 at 12:16PM ESTwouldn't there be some sort of surveillance equipment, or at the very least eye witnesses, placing him at the retirement home for hours on end, the day of a massive explosion that killed 3 people?
Jimmbo guest, I need to rewatch, but I believe Walter never walked through the lobby. And I see no reason for them to videotape their parking lot.
October 10, 2011 at 12:29PM ESTAfter Jesse, the big pressing threat is Gus' old Chilean cronies. There's no way Gus didn't have a contingency plan set up in case he was ever murdered, down to the crudité.
Oh, yeah, and there's also Mike. I have a nagging feeling VG kept him in a hospital so he could get Banks cheaply next season, seeing as how he's so easily killed off (yes, Mike could be killed anytime, but not as cleanly, from a plot perspective. At this point, Mike is strictly optional to the plot, if not to our hearts). Again, though, I'd put up with Mike being killed if we could get a karaoke flashback scene later.
Rob Unless VG wants Banks to take a pay cut, I don't think there would be any problem getting him to come back, other than him getting another job that would conflict with BB. In the AV Club interview, Banks seemed to enjoy working on BB a lot.
October 10, 2011 at 3:46PM ESTJimmbo
October 10, 2011 at 12:23PM EST Reply to CommentNow that it's all over: Why did Hector pee in the pool?
I know why VG wanted him to do it - i.e. to contrast fastidious Gus with this swaggering disgusting pig, setting up their lifetime hostility.
But from Hector's perspective, that's an awfully dumb move for the henchman of a scary cartel honcho. So what was HIS motivation?
bb superfan I think he did it because he knew that there would be bloodshed and the pool water was going to be ruined anyways. Other than that, he implied that Gus and Max were homosexuals, and peeing in the pool was his version of macho posturing in front of them.
October 10, 2011 at 3:15PM ESTchristopher_j._santarelli
October 10, 2011 at 1:01PM EST Reply to CommentHector leading to Gus's end was so fantastic because cruelty to Hector was Gus's one vice and vanity. He was businesslike, in control, with everything he did except rubbing things in the face of Hector in revenge for hector killing Max. In the end this out of character cruelty and gloating, as seen by Jesse instructed to Walt, led to Gus's demise.
Dave I
October 10, 2011 at 1:29PM EST Reply to CommentGood interview. I still have three thoughts.
First, they should have come up with something that was more plausible than the "improbable, perhaps, but not impossible" way they thought of to get the cigarette and then poison Brock. It all just seems highly improbable, and if the are even openly admitting it was an improbable plan I would like to think they could have come up with something easier to swallow.
Second, I'm mixed about hiding things from the audience. It provided that awesome reveal at the end of the episode. For that, I can really let my gripes slide. It worked on a lot of levels. On another level, I want a strong narrative and a realistic story. Hiding the cigarette swap and poisoning of Brock seemed more like parlor tricks. This show does not need them. It is not even the masking of his plan so much as the cloudiness of the details. It kind of bothers me that even the writer does not know how Walt did it, just that he did and the plan that Walt PROBABLY used was an improbable one at best. I just wanted something a little more concrete. If it does not work without such vaguery, think it through a little more. I've read Agatha Christie and Sherlock Holmes stories with more twists & turns that still revealed how it was done and made perfect logical sense, so it CAN be done. This just lacks that reveal.
Third, I do not get this as being as despicable as Vince Gilligan is making it sound, or that Walt is as bad as Gus. While it was risky, and by its nature despicable to poison a child, under the circumstances it is much, MUCH less so. His family was directly in harm's way and he had no other choice (virtually, I'm taking "turn yourself in to the Cops" off the table) since he could not afford the Saul's Buddy's Relocation Plan. It was a calculated risk, however by all rights it was a non-lethal poisoning. In the grand scheme of things, sure there is risk to Brock, no getting around that, however there was also a strong probability Gus would kill Walt's wife and children, with Gus emphasizing Walt's infant daughter. At some point, under that much duress almost anybody will be running on pure instinct. I have seen worse from people who abuse their spouses or kids on the despicable scale. He's still doing despicable things, however Walt himself is to me NOT despicable (or not AS despicable) because of how he's acting out of desperation. Of course, ironically, what IS despicable is how he's using Jesse and his love of Brock, and earlier guilt over Jane. Jesse is now burdened with the death of Jane and of Gus, neither of which were directly his fault.
Complaints aside, I'm still really looking forward to how the series wraps up next season(s).
-Cheers
Ricin Cigarette Maybe the poisoning method will be revealed next season. The writers definitely got the fans going on the analysis of whodunit and how; I think that was their intent. Someone saw that Honey Tits was shredding a school schedule, so the poisoning took place there.
October 10, 2011 at 2:30PM ESTJimmbo Everyone on Breaking Bad who does something despicable (ie everyone on Breaking Bad) does so for a reason that has at least some justification at the time. That's the deeper point of the series. It's all understandable, if not always defensible.
October 10, 2011 at 2:59PM ESTDave I R.C., yeah, they could show how the poisoning was done next season, and maybe it's awesome. Just not sure I like them deciding on it after-the-fact. Although, I still loved the episode, so I'll try to not dwell on it.
October 10, 2011 at 3:46PM ESTJimmbo . . . Very true. That's why I find very few characters truly despicable. Tio and Don E. were despicable. You still almost had to cheer for Tio because of how Gus rubbed it in to a cripple, it was like Gus had it coming. His actions otherwise seem justifiable in their own way, if you are inclined to a certain set of values. However, his tormenting of Tio somehow seemed too far on the sliding scale, as did his compliance of the dealers killing Tomas.
On the point of people doing the understandable, I agree. However, I still felt worse watching Walt watch Jane die in horror. He still had options, even if they included letting Jesse have free will to live life with a junkie and probably spiral downward in his drug addiction with his money from Jane. At least with Brock, he had no options, his life and his family's lives were literally at stake, and he chose a non-lethal way to set things in action. It's still morally reprehensible, and yes, he could have gone to the DEA, however it seems a bit less of Walt taking steps to break bad and just a bonafide genius doing what he had to for survival. Still under dubious circumstances, yet strangely you can understand it.
What makes people on this show seem evil to me is when they continue to do bad things and of their own volition. Perhaps that's a serious strike against Walt. Similar with Gus. Moreso with Gus, since he's done things that seemed more cold-blooded (although Walt's getting closer). Poisoning a kid when you knew in your heart of hearts it was not going to kill him is somehow more defensible to me than Gus taking out one of his right-hand men with a box cutter for screwing up at a crime scene, or threatening to kill Walt's entire family including his infant daughter (and meaning it). At least with Walt, even though he's on the highway to Hell, there still seems good intention. That good intention is slipping away, yet in my mind I can still relate to what he did and why he did it (or even why I might be forced to do the same, although the way I'm repulsed by the thought of actually putting any sort of poison in somebody's food, perhaps not). I similarly find Skyler despicable yet understandable, although with her it is largely her sticking it to the car wash manager and ruining his life (or at least putting a serious crimp in it) out of spite. Yet, by and large I tend to think her actions are VERY defensible. Jesse strangely comes out pretty clean. Sure, he's cooking Meth, and yeah he shot Gale and that guy in Mexico. Yet, he seems the most morally sound person on the show. Every action seems largely to be something he had very little choice in, and almost everything terrible in his life as of now seems to be tied to Walt.
That sympathy and relatability to most of the people doing bad things on this show is one of the deeper points of the series, and seems a testament to the general overall quality of the show.
-Cheers
Madel
October 10, 2011 at 1:33PM EST Reply to CommentHave others seen this nice little piece of foreshadowing from VG & Co. posted elsewhere (I got it from reddit)?
This is a shot of stuff on a shelf in Gale's apartment. Notice the distribution of orange paint on the mask: http://i.imgur.com/Ye68f.png
Mathute That is awesome.
October 10, 2011 at 2:37PM ESTNate
October 10, 2011 at 2:41PM EST Reply to CommentSo to everyone who is still trying to wrap their mind around how in the hell Walt could pull off this poisoning in the limited time he had, I say this: Is there really any question that Vince and Co. will show these exact acts in intros during the final season? Similar to how we saw Jesse originally got the RV, I have no doubt that BB will use these key unexplained moments next year to fill in the blanks, possibly as Jesse begins to figure out exactly what Walt did. So I think everyone needs to relax a little and be patient, because I would put $1000 on Vince revisiting these key moments in flashback form and blowing all of our minds in the process.
Dave I "Is there really any question that Vince and Co. will show these exact acts in intros during the final season?"
October 10, 2011 at 4:16PM ESTMaybe. I could go either way on this. But first, they'll have to figure it out themselves. The writers came up with a plan, an admittedly improbable-but-not-actually-impossible plan to work it out. So my reluctance is kind of supported by the fact that THEY do not even know what happened. Literally.
I have faith in "Vince & Co." yet can't help but feel this could have, and should have, been handled a bit differently. Then again, maybe it will. They have done masterful things with flashbacks done after the fact (e.g. Jane's cigarette in the ashtray and the flashback of her in Jesse's car, Gale's flashback about how Gale convinced Gus to hire Walt, etc., etc.). So I'm not convinced you aren't right, I'm just saying I sort of hoped they had more figured out than some loose way they discussed, and then it seems forgot, where it could, maybe, have worked, improbably though it may be that it actually would have. They literally have not figured out the actual logistics of it. That's not the stone-cold confidence in the plan they thought up for this to work out for Walt (his FIRST plan to do so if I recall) that I was hoping for.
-Cheers
Canary In A Coalmine
October 10, 2011 at 3:02PM EST Reply to CommentSo Vince Gilligan was willing to send his MOM in to flush out Gus' goons? And we're bitching about Walt being the bad guy?
Rob
October 10, 2011 at 3:51PM EST Reply to CommentI loved the Wile E. Coyote comparison! That is exactly who I thought of when Walt's schemes would go sideways! Goal accomplished with this viewer, VG!
- 1
- 2
Next 136 Comments