FX cancels 'Terriers'
Quality was incredibly high, ratings were pathetically low for underdog detective drama
FX has canceled "Terriers."
FX sold "Terriers" with the tagline "too small to fail." It's a line that has sadly proved ironic, as FX has decided not to renew the show for a second season, due to ratings that could only charitably be called "small."
The finale drew 784,000 viewers, which was one of the show's bigger audiences. Many episodes averaged around 500,000, and that number just isn't viable, even on basic cable. Even when I wrote my Save "Terriers" piece, I feared deep down that even FX president John Landgraf, one of the business' biggest champions of quality TV, couldn't rationalize keeping the show around.
Landgraf is actually doing something fairly rare in the business: he's doing a conference call later this afternoon to discuss the cancellation - and no doubt to lament the fact that it didn't do well enough to stick around. Because as you and I have said many, many times, the show itself was fantastic, and deserving of a much better fate and bigger audience.
I'll have a second write-up after the Landgraf call, and possibly with some comment from Shawn Ryan and/or Ted Griffin if they're available. But like I said in my review of the series finale, we still have these great 13 episodes, and we'll still always have Hank and Britt in the pickup, waiting to decide whether to go straight or turn left. And that's something.
News From Our Partners
-
Gateways To Geekery: There’s more to Russ Meyer’s films than breasts, though those are pretty important
Interview: Men In Black 3 director Barry Sonnenfeld on creating character and managing 3-D
The Walkthrough: 30 Rock showrunner Robert Carlock walks us through some recent series highlights
-
'Twilight Breaking Dawn Part 2': Edward, Bella And Jacob Character Posters (PHOTOS)
Russell Crowe, Elvis Costello, Sing Elvis Presley And Johnny Cash In London
'Men In Black 3' Unscripted: Josh Brolin Doesn't Know Will Smith's Song 'Summertime'
-
'SYTYCD' Season 9 premiere: Shafeek Westbrook wows the judges
'X Factor': Britney Spears and Demi Lovato face off over contestant
'Law & Order: SVU' cliffhanger: EP Warren Leight on what's next for Cragen and the squad
-
'Dark Knight Rises' TV Spots: A Lighter Side Of Batman
Emma Stone Nabs First 'MTV Trailblazer Award'
One Direction Hit 'MIB 3' Premiere Armed With Toy Guns
-
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Thursday, May 24, 2012
The Telefile - Modern Family: Best Lines of the Season 3 Finale
The Telefile - Today's TWoP News: Wednesday, May 23, 2012
-
Catherine McKenzie: The Bachelorette Games
'Idol' Continues Downward Ratings Spiral
'Idol' Winner Inspires Nation After Enduring 8 Surgeries During Season
-
Critics Consensus: Men in Black III Is Solid Fun
Five Favorite Films with Director-Producer Oren Peli
Cannes 2012: Critics Scorecard
About This Blog
All through his childhood, Alan Sepinwall's relatives told his parents, "All that boy does is watch television! How's he going to make a living doing that?" His career as a TV critic has been 15 years and counting of his attempt to answer their concerns. "What's Alan Watching" is a blog whose title is self-explanatory: Alan watches TV shows, then writes about what he watched. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching
HitFix Poll
Will you still watch Community without Dan Harmon behind it?
Latest Posts
-
What would he have done differently? And what did the finale mean?Thursday, May 24, 2012
-
Our summer rewind will take us into season 2 of 'Deadwood'Thursday, May 24, 2012
-
Danny Masterson and friends don't do much of interest in Breckin Meyer-created sitcomWednesday, May 23, 2012
-
Celebrate the finale's anniversary with Jack, Sawyer, Hurley and friendsWednesday, May 23, 2012

Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup- 1
- 2
- 3
Next 104 Comments
December 6, 2010 at 1:07PM EST Reply to CommentI heard about this in an email from a coworker and it totally ruined my day. TV can be a harsh medium sometimes.
Thad
December 6, 2010 at 1:07PM EST Reply to CommentNo. :(
That's all I have to say.
conrad
December 6, 2010 at 1:07PM EST Reply to CommentFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUU....
erinpayton Conrad, my first thought exactly.
December 6, 2010 at 1:49PM ESTNicole Thirded.
December 6, 2010 at 3:33PM ESTOmar
December 6, 2010 at 1:07PM EST Reply to CommentNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Alan, best one and done series ever?
Dan F&G
December 6, 2010 at 1:28PM ESTVN I hate to be labeled the "Firefly" faboy, but I think the title still goes to that one.
December 6, 2010 at 4:01PM ESTTerriers is definitely in the top 5 though.
igor
December 6, 2010 at 1:07PM EST Reply to CommentSo sad
Dan and unfair. Dexter gets one more.
December 6, 2010 at 1:13PM EST
December 6, 2010 at 1:09PM EST Reply to CommentSo disappointed. Kind of sad it all ends with the on-the-nose "left or right" ending. (Kind of like the end of Season Four in The Wire with the stop sign/crossroads.) But that aside, I really enjoyed the show in the short time we had with it! I still think the combination of an ambiguous title and even more ambiguous early ads doomed the show from the get-go. So many people I know think it was about dogs. Sigh.
const
December 6, 2010 at 1:12PM EST Reply to Commentvery sad, but unfortunately expected. At least we got 13 great episodes and closure. what a shame that a show like Terriers gets canceled while the deluge of CSIs remain on the air. I won't ever watch any of those formulaic shows.
JanieJones
December 6, 2010 at 1:12PM EST Reply to CommentBroke my heart when I read the news. Favorite new show of 2010.
Yes, 13 episodes to leave in its wake but I still imagined what S2 might have brought.
Alan, thanks for your reviews and praise for a show that deserved all the recognition it deserved.
Thanks to Donal Logue, Michael Raymond-James and the memorable talented cast, Ted Griffin, Shawn Ryan for a gem of show.
JanieJones I really need to proof read.
December 6, 2010 at 7:15PM ESTklg19
December 6, 2010 at 1:14PM EST Reply to CommentNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jack Secunda
December 6, 2010 at 1:17PM EST Reply to CommentI knew I was going to be upset by the knew, but not THIS upset. I went onto Deadline to read about Dexter's renewal (still a decent show, but leagues beneath Terriers) and saw a small segment on Terriers, so came straight here knowing you would have written about it, Alan.
Truly sad but, as you say, not entirely unexpected or unjustified. A real, genuine shame though. I know it's tempting to opt for them going left and living down in Mexico together, but I'm sticking with Britt doing time and learning from it, even if we'll never be able to see where they go from here.
LJA
December 6, 2010 at 1:18PM EST Reply to CommentUgh. Now I'm depressed as all hell. Goddamnit, this sucks!
PY
December 6, 2010 at 1:19PM EST Reply to CommentAlan, what do you think are the criteria for a pickup of an existing show by the DirecTV 101 channel, and is that even a remote possibility for Terriers?
Travis Not to burst any bubbles, but I believe TVbythenumbers.com had a story about how DriecTV is out of the saving show business.
December 6, 2010 at 1:25PM ESTSoSad
December 6, 2010 at 1:21PM EST Reply to CommentI'll get the DVDs and watch a Terriers / Lucky double feature.
Upsetting.
Chrissy
December 6, 2010 at 1:24PM EST Reply to CommentAw, this is such a shame. Understandable, I suppose, but just a doggone shame (forgive me).
It seems like a weird time for TV, with a lot of good shows getting made, but few staying around for long (Rubicon, Lone Star, Party Down, Terriers). I really wonder how much the Nielsens are to blame - can such a small sample size really be indicative of the markets that are out there, particularly when so many people are getting their TV in non-traditional ways? I know it's what we have to work with, but as the majority of TV gets blander and blander, and quality shows find it hard to thrive, I wonder if basing programming decisions on such a small subset of the audience isn't turning away viewers.
Ah, well, bring on the DVDs. Here's hoping Lights Out is excellent, or this TV season will be a wash for me. (And honestly, as a huge TV fan, if there aren't shows out there that *I* want to watch? That seems indicative of some bad decision-making somewhere.)
specialj67
December 6, 2010 at 1:24PM EST Reply to CommentAnd to think I was just raving to a co-worker not an hour ago how awesome this show is and lamenting it's low ratings. I completely get why they would cancel a show with such low numbers, but it doesn't mean I have to like it. :(((((
December 6, 2010 at 1:26PM EST Reply to CommentI guess ultimately they had the life expectancy of a fly with a heart condition.
Speaking of heart conditions, mine is seriously hurting right now. Sonofabitch.
Nicole Ha. When Hank said that line in the finale my first thought was how reflective it was of the show itself. And now I'm just really, really sad about it's accuracy.
December 6, 2010 at 3:42PM ESTtl
December 6, 2010 at 1:26PM EST Reply to Commentu think they can try to move to hbo or tnt (anywhere) this show is too good to be cancelled
AJ
December 6, 2010 at 1:27PM EST Reply to CommentF you FX. FFFFFFFF YOUUUUUUUUUUU
December 6, 2010 at 1:30PM EST Reply to CommentWrite a comment...
It's a mistake. If they gave it another year it would have reached sustainable levels and given FX a handful of Emmys. Now they will have the legacy of a "Brillaint But Cancelled" show that will have a substaintal second life on DVD. Sigh.
December 6, 2010 at 1:31PM ESTAnd they drove straight. Britt is manning up and doing his time.
Lisa I totally agree. They had the Alpha viewers, they just needed to let the rest of the world catch on. UGH.
December 6, 2010 at 1:40PM ESTdead souls I loved this show but I doubt it was going to be winning any Emmys. Plus, even if the ratings had doubled it would still be the lowest rated drama on FX.
December 6, 2010 at 2:24PM EST
December 6, 2010 at 1:31PM EST Reply to CommentAhhhhhh...broken hearted.
December 6, 2010 at 1:31PM EST Reply to CommentI knew Terriers was doomed as soon as I loved it. I can only hope that everyone from the show moves on and makes some more great TV.
conrad same with rubicon [on both counts].
December 6, 2010 at 1:36PM ESTjan I feel the same way. Maybe I should be grateful to the powers that be that now I have an hour (two counting Rubicon) when I can do something constructive. The more crap they put on--and yes, I mean "reality" shows--the less TV I watch. Maybe that's what they want. I've never even known anyone who has a Nielsen box.
December 6, 2010 at 2:15PM ESTMatt
December 6, 2010 at 1:32PM EST Reply to CommentI'll miss Hank and Britt :( Great show, would have loved to see more.
December 6, 2010 at 1:33PM EST Reply to CommentThink DirectTV will rescue this show like it rescued "Damages" and "Friday Night Lights"?
PotatoSolution Nobody in their right minds would pick up "Terriers". I adore the show, but the ratings were horrific.
December 6, 2010 at 2:08PM ESTBryan
December 6, 2010 at 1:33PM EST Reply to CommentBOOO!
too late now but I just had a great idea to help the ratings - a Justified /Terriors two-parter (they don't do those enough- I used to love those when I was a kid - the last ones I remember was Homicide/Law and Order)
Anyway, that woulda been GREAT tv
Brittany
December 6, 2010 at 1:35PM EST Reply to CommentHow is it that a great show is cancelled and jersey shore gets a third season!!!! Ugh American media scares me
LJA Like.
December 6, 2010 at 2:26PM ESTZacharyTF I think you meant Stupid American public. :)
December 6, 2010 at 2:34PM ESTKmarko
December 6, 2010 at 1:37PM EST Reply to CommentDamn it. So much for sending emails, etc., that was a waste of time. Stupid decision, too--the uptick to about 800K for the finale indicated to me it would be clear a million & head for two over the next season.
I never watched a show before that got cancelled too soon...is this what it feels like when someone breaks up w/you?
Ugh ugh ugh.
PAChaz
December 6, 2010 at 1:37PM EST Reply to CommentSad news. What a great show.
Chrisa
December 6, 2010 at 1:43PM EST Reply to Commentto conclude Conrad's comment...
ccccccccccccccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.
citizenmilton
December 6, 2010 at 1:44PM EST Reply to CommentNetwork TV is such a bizarre business for the lay person to understand. It's a medium that unloads bland worthless product by the truckload - and many of us tolerate it for those rare gems.... and "Terriers" was was one of those diamonds in the rough.
It's hard to understand why these talented businesspeople can succeed in making money on pure dreck, yet fail to capitalize on works of brilliance?
I wonder how much the recession factors into this. Seems like a trigger-happy act based in fear. Terriers didn't even get a chance to try to ride any buzz into a second opportunity from either DVD or awards campaigns.....
Oh well, Terriers, it was great knowing you. Best of luck to all its creators.
RCG
December 6, 2010 at 1:44PM EST Reply to CommentSo basically FX is fine with letting predator Neal McDonough escape justice and continue roaming the streets. Real classy, Landgraf.
- 1
- 2
- 3
Next 104 Comments