Cannes Film Festival 2013

Firewall & Iceberg Podcast, episode 64: 'Parks and Recreation,' Pee-Wee on HBO and listener mail

How did TV's best comedy handle the transition into the "real" season 3 episodes?

The

It's Monday, which means it's time for a new Firewall & Iceberg Podcast, in which Dan and I preview this week's "Parks and Recreation" (the first one produced after the show returned from a long, pregnancy-related hiatus), talk about Pee-wee Herman's HBO special, and answer a bunch of your questions. The run-down: 

"Parks & Recreation" -- 01:10 - 09:50
"The Pee-wee Herman Show on Broadway" -- 09:50 - 18:05
Listener Mail - The Sweeps System -- 18:20 - 24:43
Listener Mail - "Shameless"  -- 24:55 - 35:05
Listener Mail - Media kits and promotional items -- 35:10 - 45:15
Listener Mail - Out-of-synch pop culture references -- 45:15 - 49:45
Listener Mail - Basic cable language/nudity -- 49:50 - 58:30 (NOTE: This segment features extensive use of profanity and discussion of various sexual acts, but with a warning first)
Listener Mail - Fictional characters on "The Amazing Race" -- 58:40 - 01:02:40
 
As always, you can subscribe to The Firewall & Iceberg Podcast over at the iTunes Store, where you can also rate us and comment on us. Or you can always follow our RSS Feed, download the MP3 file or stream it on Dan's blog.
 
And as always, feel free to e-mail us at sepinwall@hitfix.com and/or dan@hitfix.com if you have questions you want answered on the show. Please put the word "podcast" in your subject line to make it easy to track them down amid the hundreds of random press releases we get every day.

Get Instant Alerts - Latest Posts from What's Alan Watching
By subscribing to this e-alert, you agree to HitFix Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and to occasionally receive promotional emails from HitFix.

Follow Alan Sepinwall and Whats Alan Watching on

RSS Facebook Twitter
 
Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Violator__remastered_-_sacd__talkback_profile

    Bix

    Since "The Pee-Wee Herman Show" = the adult-oriented Groundlings show that was made into an HBO special in the '80s and the kids' show = "Pee-Wee's Playhouse" and the new special is "The Pee-Wee Herman Show On Broadway," doesn't that make this a sequel to the original Groundlings show, only with the "Pee-Wee's Playhouse" characters like Chairy added because they're from the more well-known version that people are nostalgiac about and people would be pissed if they weren't there? (Boy, is that a run-on sentence!) In that case, I don't get fretting about the lack of camera tricks or being surprised by the adult content.

    March 14, 2011 at 5:40PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      KarenX I remember that special. There was a point where the woman was dancing around doing arabesques and Pee-Wee was following her around with mirrors on his shoes, until she revealed that she wasn't wearing any underwear. It ran on HBO during the daytime, which is how my brother and I first became fans.

      March 14, 2011 at 8:56PM EST
  • Violator__remastered_-_sacd__talkback_profile

    Bix

    Now that I'm further into the show, Re: The language/violence/nudity discussion, here's a story that Alan will love that I heard from an ABC VP:

    Remember how in the last season or two of NYPD Blue (not basic cable, but also adhering to a lot of the standards discussed), they were cleared to say "sh--" but always said "bullsh--"? Well, the writers originally wanted it to be "horsesh--," but it was rejected because it was it was considered a more literal reference to excrement while "bullsh--" is more colloquial. Really.

    Re: Nip/Tuck, when a couple obsessed with Barbie and Ken decided to all of their stuff removed, they showed a frontal view "Barbie's" breasts post-surgery since she no longer had areolas and nipples. Yup.

    March 14, 2011 at 6:14PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jimmy Crack Corn

    About time this podcenter started using profanity and start talking about nudity. Instant download.

    March 14, 2011 at 6:56PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Randomer

    Michael Weston was the first one I thought of to be on the Amazing Race. He's traveled the world and speaks multiple languages (I remember him busting out Russian in an episode, you telling me he couldn't bust out a couple Romance Languages). Just sit back while he does all the driving and the hard tasks.

    March 14, 2011 at 7:50PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Gizmo_bigger_talkback_profile

      dan Randomer - I prefer to think that rather than speaking the languages in each country, Michael Weston would just do a different really bad accent each leg...

      -Daniel

      March 14, 2011 at 7:58PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      alamble Given that Michael's Spanish is hilariously, admittedly bad, I think the other Romance languages might actually be a problem for him. Not that it would be a big deal on TAR, since you can generally find English-speaking folks in Western Europe fairly easily.

      -alyson

      March 15, 2011 at 11:02PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    AdamWest

    On language/nudity on basic cable, it depends on how often they use it. Sons of Anarchy for example uses sh-- in every other paragraph and that always draws attention to the fact that they don't say fu-- or any other 4 letter word. They just seem like a very selective grump in their cursing.

    Justified on the other hand occasionally uses the word sh-- but I don't think anymore on it because it's not used 10 times in 15 minutes.

    March 14, 2011 at 11:02PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    ed w

    I had to laugh at Alan's superficial Amazing Race choices. Personally I'd choose Ann Perkins, because she's a nurse and could keep us healthy and not at all because Rashida Jones is one of the most beautiful actresses in the world.

    If you are short on things to discuss next week you could give your appraisal's of this season of Archer, which I don't recall being touched on yet in the podcasts.

    March 15, 2011 at 12:16PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Midnight_run_mca255950_talkback_profile

      sepinwall They were only half-superficial! Yes, I mainly chose hot women, but they were all hot women with specific skills (or, in the case of Joan, the demonstrated ability to quickly master new skills) that would be valuable on the Race.

      Give me half-credit, people!!!

      March 15, 2011 at 12:18PM EST
    • One note about Joan on TAR: you'd have no problem getting help from the locals. You may never have to use your supplied cash to pay for anything.

      Is Boston Rob considered a fictional character yet? Cause he might be my choice.

      March 16, 2011 at 11:51PM EST
    • A_talkback_profile

      belinda I think it was pretty shocking that Alan was the one picking partners based on half superficial reasons and not Dan! What a revelation. :D

      March 18, 2011 at 7:18PM EST


  • My personal favorite use of the lone f-bomb in a PG-13 film is in Big Trouble in Little China.

    "Hollow?"

    "Hollow"

    "F*** it."

    Given your discussion of profanity on cable, though, I was wondering if there was a reason I'd seen less of it on this site recently. Not a complaint, since it doesn't affect the quality of writing, but I've noticed, particularly in Drew's posts, that f-bombs are getting starred out.

    March 15, 2011 at 1:43PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Stringer_bell_talkback_profile

    macontosh2000

    First I would run The Amazing Race with Sydney Bristow (Alias). Her being pretty much perfect would balance out my asthma/back and knee problems/general clumsiness.

    I believe that basic cable shows should be able to show anything they want, but I also know thats never going to happen due to advertisers and the PTC. I believe that if you are mature enough to watch a show about a corrupt cop, plastic surgeons, meth dealers, ect. you probably already know about nipples and the word f***.
    And a good example of when the F word was needed (and bleeped) was in the season 3 episode of Breaking Bad I.F.T. "I'm Screwing Ted" wouldnt of had the same effect.

    And I am loving Shameless, I never knew that Emmy Rossum had this in her. Frank is also my least favorite character, I probably would have liked the show more without him. But I have to say I like Frank more now that we met their mother.

    This is my first time commenting on this podcast, I have been looking for a good tv podcast for a while now, and I think I may have found it!

    March 15, 2011 at 3:15PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Stringer_bell_talkback_profile

      macontosh2000 I forgot to comment on pop culture references.

      As long as the show has a good story and doesnt go overboard with the references I dont have a problem with them, but it automatically dates a show.
      Sorry to go into movies but its the Pixar Vs. Dreamworks Animation argument. Pixar films are about the characters/ story, Dreamworks is usually about the characters making pop culture references. Pixar films will be remembered 50 years from now, Dreamworks will become irrelevent in 5-10 years (with the exception of Kung Fu Panda and How To Train Your Dragon).

      And as for Seth Cohen making a reference to Fast Times at Ridgemont High, I am okay with it. I was born 6 years after the movie came out and I would have gotten the reference.

      March 15, 2011 at 4:32PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Muz

    A whole episode dedicated to the last season of Rosanne would probably be torturously hilarious (the torture and hilarity aspects probably switching between broadcaster and audience at various points).
    'The whole last season of Rosanne' also sounds somewhat like the worst challenge from some Amazing Race-esque show.

    March 15, 2011 at 5:11PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    MJM

    In regards to Parks & Rec's use of bleeping I find it funny. Limited to a few times it can be really funny.

    However, I could not watch Southland because of their bleeping. In the episodes I tried to watch I found it too big a distraction.

    I will also never understand why violence doesn't seem to be a problem, but language and sex on TV is so frowned upon. I've cursed and had sex a lot compared to being violent. I just don't get it.

    I don't watch shows just because they curse, but the shows with cursing do feel a lot more realistic than shows without.

    March 15, 2011 at 8:19PM EST Reply to Comment


  • My choice: Rollin Hand. Resources of IMF. master of disguise. Cool as hell. Knows magic.

    March 16, 2011 at 7:52AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web