Cannes Film Festival 2013

Firewall & Iceberg Podcast, episode 54: Press tour, 'Lights Out,' 'Off the Map' & 'Harry's Law'

Dan and Alan mix in reviews of new shows with anecdotes from the TV critics' tour

The

It's the most wonderful time of the year for the Firewall & Iceberg Podcast! I'm in California for the TV critics' press tour, which means Dan and I get to record a few podcasts in the same room. No technical issues, no guessing at the other's body language - just briliant damn insight and hilarious comedy. (Maybe) 

This week's first episode (there may be another later in the week) is a mix of press tour anecdotes and reviews of shows debuting over the next week-plus. The run-down: 

Press Tour - 00:00:00 - 00:21:10
"Off the Map" - 00:25:40 - 00:35:50
"Lights Out" - 00:36:00 - 00:50:05
"Harry's Law" - 0051:20 - 01:01:30 

As always, you can subscribe to The Firewall & Iceberg Podcast over at the iTunes Store, where you can also rate us and comment on us. Or you can always follow our RSS Feed, download the MP3 file or stream it on Dan's blog.

And as always, feel free to e-mail us at sepinwall@hitfix.com and/or dan@hitfix.com if you have questions you want answered on the show. Please put the word "podcast" in your subject line to make it easy to track them down amid the hundreds of random press releases we get every day.

Get Instant Alerts - Latest Posts from What's Alan Watching
By subscribing to this e-alert, you agree to HitFix Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and to occasionally receive promotional emails from HitFix.

Follow Alan Sepinwall and Whats Alan Watching on

RSS Facebook Twitter
 
Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    Jon88

    Looking forward to this week's. Dan's tweets as he watched "Harry's Law" were hysterical.

    January 10, 2011 at 7:31PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Madmen_icon_talkback_profile

    LJA

    I *do* fucking hate Meredith Grey!

    January 10, 2011 at 9:02PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    GJA

    Guys really, if you are going to have a sponsor make it something that is not a tv show. As is lately it's like hearing "NBC Nightly news, sponsored by Senator Soandso for President". And Mr Williams, like you guys, has a lot of respect, and people wouldn't think him automatically being biased in favor of the sponsor, but it would still affect his perceived integrity. Appearances do matter even if the journalist/blogger/reviewer etc is not being bought as I'm sure you guys are not.

    Unless.... the whole thing is a joke? In which case good one, ya got me.

    January 10, 2011 at 9:50PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      GJA Okay now that I've listened to the podcast the whole way through I see you guys seem to be in kind of a bind, a now win situation. Well I stand by what I say above but at the same time I see your dilemma in it being out of your hands. Hopefully your bosses will find a win-win solution eventually.

      January 10, 2011 at 10:05PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    micguar

    Why isn't this podcast on iTunes? The most recent one is from the third. At least for me.

    January 11, 2011 at 12:56PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Guesser Ditto

      January 11, 2011 at 3:06PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    brandon

    I had a very hard time hearing this one. Volume seemed awfully low. Was I the only one?

    January 11, 2011 at 3:12PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    rosengje

    Posted this on Dan's blog as well (now that you both work for the same site, any chance of using only one post?):

    I just want to add to the chorus of voices requesting some type of review of "Downton Abbey," even if it comes midway through the run or at the end as an assessment of it as a whole. I do think there is a certain homogeneity to the types of shows deemed worthy of critical analysis, particularly with hour-long shows. "Downton Abbey" represents a genre not frequently seen anymore on tv, on an under-covered network. I would also guess that it is more female-skewing, an area of programming I think the site could do a slightly better job with after similarly ignoring "Huge" and typically just giving recaps rather than reviews to others.

    It seems to me that this is exactly the type of show that would benefit from critical attention. I do think critics should regularly push themselves to view programming outside of their viewing comfort zone. After all, critics expect viewers to do the same thing based on their recommendation. I'm not a huge fan of private eye shows, but had I not heeded Alan's recommendation, I would have missed out on Terriers. I'd much rather read about "Downton Abbey" than see another indifferent review of "Off the Map."

    January 12, 2011 at 2:30AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web