'Firefly' Rewind - 'Serenity' (the motion picture)
A Browncoat-created miracle of a film
Big damn hero speech time for Mal (Nathan Fillion) in "Serenity."
Are you a fan of Firefly?
Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.
Time to finish up our summer-long journey through Joss Whedon's outer space Western series "Firefly" with a look at "Serenity," the feature film that Joss and company reunited to produce a few years after Fox canceled the TV show. My review coming up just as soon as I think you're going to start a fair fight...
"People don't like to be meddled with." -River
"I believe in something greater than myself: A better world. A world without sin." -The Operative
"So no more running. I aim to misbehave." -Mal
There's a phrase widely attributed to Napoleon - and used as the title to an episode of "Deadwood," yet another TV twist on the Western, which debuted a little over a year after "Firefly" was canceled - that says that history is a lie agreed upon.
The main plot of "Serenity" deals with just such a piece of history - the lie of what happened to the people of Miranda, and how the Reavers were created as a result - but the movie itself is something of a lie agreed upon.
Basically, Joss Whedon and his fans convinced the executives at Universal of several things: 1)That the audience for "Firefly" was much larger than the Nielsen ratings showed, and that the Browncoats would therefore turn out in huge numbers for a feature film release, and 2)Despite the film being a spin-off of a short-lived, allegedly low-rated TV show, it would be accessible and appealing to the non-Browncoats.
Neither proved to be entirely true.
The movie was a box office disappointment, not making back its production budget until the DVDs came out. The Browncoats went to see it, but not many non-fans. The reviews were generally positive (it has an 81% score on Rotten Tomatoes), but the strongest praise tended to come, unsurprisingly, from critics who had watched the TV show. (Roger Ebert, for instance, gave it three stars but closed his review with the line "it was made by and for people who can't get enough of this stuff. You know who you are.") Clearly, it was possible to enjoy the film without knowing the backstory - Joss is too good a craftsman to not have the film work on that level - but it's so, so much better if you about Mal's history, if you've seen what Jayne was like before "Jaynestown," if you're familiar with the Zoe/Wash marriage(*), etc. It was a film made, first and foremost, for fans of the show. Those fans unfortunately weren't large enough in number to keep the show on the air (not that Fox's various scheduling decisions helped), nor were they big enough to turn the film into a hit.
(*) One of the movie's bigger failings, on the appealing-to-newbies level, is that it does such a poor job of even making it clear that Zoe and Wash are married. There's a line during the long introduction to the Serenity crew where Mal tells Zoe "talk to your husband," but if you don't know he's referring to Wash, it comes by too quickly to register. They're a bit affectionate in a later scene, but Zoe's reaction to Wash's death likely didn't hit a newcomer nearly as hard as it did those who understood.
But if "Serenity" is a lie on some level, it's a glorious, wildly entertaining lie, from first minute to last.
Joss had worked in movies before as a screenwriter, but never had control over what the director would do with his ideas. ("Buffy" the series was in a way seven years of Joss giving a middle finger to Fran Rubel Kuzui, and I remember mentioning "Alien: Resurrection" once to him and Joss wincing at what Jean-Pierre Jeunet had done to his script.) And he had directed episodes of his shows, but always on a TV schedule and (relatively low for the medium) budget. "Serenity" wasn't a budget-buster for Universal or anything, but the scale of it was vastly bigger than anything Whedon had had full control over before, and his joy at getting to play with his new toys is palpable.
The film opens with one flashy bit of storytelling after another: the Universal logo becomes an image of the exodus from the Earth that was, which then turns into a history lesson about the creation of the 'verse, which then becomes River's nightmare of her school days, which then becomes a video flashback being watched by the Operative before he makes poor Michael Hitchcock literally fall on his sword. Story on top of story on top of story, and all of it being controlled by the winners. (In the film's universe, that's the Alliance; in the real world, it's Joss for getting to make the film.) We then get the movie's logo, which becomes a part of Serenity's hull, and after a Whedon-esque bit of undercutting cliches (the heroic music is interrupted by a piece of Serenity flying off), we travel inside the ship for a tracking shot of the whole Serenity crew like we got at the end of "Objects in Space", only much, much more elaborate, as Mal walks the length of the ship chatting with all the remaining members of the crew. (Book and Inara are gone, though they of course turn up later in their new homes.)
And the movie climaxes with one great action set piece after another: Mal wiping the smugness off the Operative's face by siccing the entire Reaver fleet on him, Wash being a leaf on the wind, the crew making a final stand to buy Mal time, River finally taking control of her gifts and becoming a prototypical Whedon heroine, and Mal and the Operative fighting while dangling from chains in the bottomless shaft that must exist at the center of every sci-fi space station (see also Niska's space station, Cloud City on Bespin, etc.).
What makes those action sequences special isn't just that they look cool, but that all the moments are tied to character in some way: Mal is using the Alliance's deep dark secret against it by luring the Reavers to fight the Operative. Zoe is simultaneously grieving and being her amazing warrior woman self as she goes after the Reavers. River, having shared the secret of Miranda with others, starts to feel whole, and then the transformation is complete when she realizes how much Simon needs her. Etc. It's not just wicked explosions and kung fu(**); the moments go much deeper than that, and are paying off everything we've seen over 14 episodes of television and an hour-plus of the movie.
(**) In fact, the character stuff is strong enough to compensate for some lesser action moments. Mal's fight with with the Operative at the Companion training house looks fairly slow and awkward, like the two actors are trying really hard to remember fight choreography they learned five minutes before, yet it's still a good scene because of how the two characters play off of each other, and because Inara is hanging on the sidelines heckling Mal like usual (and then saving the day).
As the series mostly was, the film is Mal and River's story. Whedon tries to give everyone else a good moment or two, like Book's nighttime chat with Mal on Haven, or Jayne offending Mal and Zoe by bringing up the Battle of Serenity Valley, but essentially everyone is there to help illustrate aspects of the cold, hard captain and the damaged, dangerous girl traveling aboard his ship. Given how well we got to know the whole crew, it's disappointing - particularly that Wash dies one of those trademark Whedon sudden deaths in the climax of a movie in which he's had so little to do(***) - but understandable. If Whedon had set the story aside so he could service all the characters equally, "Serenity" would have been 100% fan service, rather than the 50/50 or so ratio that the film ultimately achieves.
(***) Wash's death, far more than Book's, has always seemed to rankle fans. And I get that, to a degree. Alan Tudyk was so likable and funny on the show, Joss has this history of using death to break up happy couples, Book was the show's most marginal character during its brief run, etc. But the stakes are impossibly high here, and it would feel like a cheat if every one of the regular characters from the show had survived both the Alliance and the Reavers. If the only casualties involved ancillary characters like Mr. Universe or the twins, then the threat Mal and company faced isn't as real, and the risks they took to get the message out there don't mean as much. Somebody had to die - more than one person, preferably - and then it comes down to picking favorites. Like, I never developed much of an attachment for Simon and wouldn't have cared if he died, but I know he had his fans, and I know that it would have been a much darker ending for Kaylee and River if he had. Or could you imagine the revolt if Jayne had been the one to fall? Somebody was going to be unhappy no matter what if Joss was telling the story honestly, and at least Wash got a triumphant moment in guiding Serenity down through that maelstrom before he died in mid-sentence. And the death is only really bad from a narrative standpoint if you assume there were going to be more movies after this one, which the box office numbers made moot.
Fans of lots of canceled shows hold out hope that some other network will rescue their favorite show - or even, wonder of wonders, that there might be a movie made. "Firefly" is one of the rare shows to pull off the latter trick ("Police Squad!," which begat "The Naked Gun," is another, and of course there's "Star Trek"), and the existence of "Serenity" is as much a miracle as what Mal and the Serenity crew pull off over the course of the film. These people have no business surviving what happens, let alone winning, and yet most of them do.
And even though the movie wasn't a hit (and is likely used as a cautionary tale when movie execs consider an "Arrested Development" or "Veronica Mars" film), it exists, and it's great. And that, as the hero of Canton once said... well I guess that's something.
Some other thoughts:
• As written by Joss and played by Chiwetel Ejiofor, the Operative may be my favorite Whedon villain other than the Mayor of Sunnydale (or Angel during "Buffy" season two). No pretense, no hypocrisy, no bluster: he knows who and what he is, and when Mal eventually proves him wrong about the people he's working for, he concedes the point and spares the crew's lives. (And recovers in record time from a blow to the Adam's apple and a broken back in order to reach his communicator and give the order to his men.)
• Another sign of the increased budget from TV to movie: the mule is transformed from an ATV into a hovership.
• That's Glenn Howerton from "Always Sunny" as the man Mal kills to spare him a worse fate at the hands of the Reavers, and of course Sarah Paulson as the woman making the Miranda recording about the Pax.
• Krumholtz! I always love David Krumholtz (I even watched a half a season of "Numbers" for him despite not caring much for crime procedurals) and was pleased to see him as Mr. Universe, including his Jewish wedding ceremony to the Love-Bot. I've also always found the scene where the Love-Bot is cradling Mr. Universe's corpse and relaying his dying words to be weirdly tender and moving.
• Lots of good humor in the film, unsurprisingly. I'm always partial to Mal and Jayne's very different reactions to Kaylee's lament about her sex life. And she and Simon ultimately get their happy ending, as do (in a less overt way) Mal and Inara.
• I'm a bit puzzled on the timeline, in that Mal says it's only been eight months since the Tams came aboard his ship in the pilot, yet Book has clearly been at Haven for quite a while. Exactly how much time lapsed over the course of the series, and then between the series and the film?
• Lotta good Fillion in this one, particularly the one-two-three punch of Mal holding Book as he dies, Mal arguing with the Operative and then Mal ordering the crew to desecrate the ship and the bodies of their friends so they can make it through the Reaver space. Again, a lot of this show's best moments involved Malcolm Reynolds making hard, horrible choices and imposing his will on others to make sure his orders get followed.
• And my favorite part of the scene with Mal's post-Miranda speech isn't the monologue itself, but Jayne's response. For once, even Jayne Cobb realizes the selfless course of action is the only one that should be taken.
• The tiny woman who kicks ass has almost become a cliche because of Whedon's work on "Buffy," et al, but you watch Summer Glau move through the Reavers during the climactic fight and she carries herself in a way that really does make it seem believable. Makes me want to see a movie about a team of ballerinas who are taught kung fu and recruited to be soldiers of fortune.
• Mal's line in the final scene about how "Love keeps her in the air when she oughta fall down" - that's as much about the fans as it is about the crew, is it not?
So that's it for me on "Firefly." Been a fun bit of nostalgia. Hope next year's rewind selection is half as entertaining.
What did everybody else think?
Alan Sepinwall may be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com
Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching
Around the Web
News From Our Partners
-
Abigail Breslin Gets a Big Bonus If She Wins an Oscar
'Grease' Cast: Where Are They Now?
New 'Don Jon' Clip: Scarlett Johansson Meets the Jersey Parents
-
The Telefile - Veep: The Episode's Best Insults
The Telefile - The Most Heinous Person on Reality TV This Week
The Telefile - Awkward.: Why Season 3 Has Been So Disappointing
-
Box Office Guru Wrapup: Man of Steel Sets June Record
Weekly Ketchup: Man of Steel Sequel In the Works
Five Favorite Films with Joss Whedon
-
Watch This: Planet Terror pays gleeful tribute to B zombie movies
Scenic Routes: In Heat, Al Pacino and Robert De Niro face off—though not in the way audiences expected
Hear This: A dad’s love for “Oh Sherrie” conjures up memories—and a few unanswered questions
-
Jason Derulo Marks Sixth Top 10 Single With 'The Other Side'
Britney Spears, 'Ooh La La' – Song Review
Drake + Miguel to Tour This Fall
-
IT'S HAPPENING
Miss Utah On Workplace Inequality: 'Create Education Better'
Kim Kardashian's Pregnancy Nightmare
-
'Wolf Of Wall Street' Trailer: Kanye West Joins Scorsese/DiCaprio Brotherhood
'Kick-Ass 2' Set Visit: The Exclusive Inside Look
'Man Of Steel' Crushes Box Office With Largest June Opening Ever
-
What to Watch Tonight: Warehouse 13, Teen Wolf, and Adventure Time
Mad Men "The Quality of Mercy" Review: Nobody Likes a Tattle Tale
True Blood Season 6 Premiere Review: Feels Like Home



Comments
Option 1
Comment instantly as a guest GuestOption 2
Option 3
Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup- 1
- 2
Next 129 Comments
September 14, 2010 at 7:47AM EST Reply to CommentNext summer you should review Babylon 5, the king of space operas and season long arcs.
SirOnion Babylon 5... the king of long speeches!
September 14, 2010 at 8:18AM ESTTom Yeah, a far, far superior show to the Whedon created drivel that was Firefly. Kudos for the great suggestion.
September 14, 2010 at 8:25AM ESTJeff W Too long for a summer rewind, and too difficult to isolate a single season, but still a great show.
September 14, 2010 at 9:30AM ESTgame 6 Crusade would be a good choice, another cool series that got aborted before many episodes were made...
September 14, 2010 at 9:43AM ESTsepinwall Not a JMS fan, so don't hold your breath for either of those.
September 14, 2010 at 10:22AM ESTchuchundra I loved B5 when it first came out, but it really doesn't stand up to re-watching.
September 14, 2010 at 10:36AM ESTmedrawt The great question posed by _Babylon 5_: if the two series regulars whose performances outshine everyone else in your cast are also the series regulars buried under the most layers of makeup and prosthetic, is that a positive or negative comment on the quality of your show?
September 14, 2010 at 10:42AM ESTI do credit JMS for writing, I think, about two entire network-length seasons of television more or less by his damn self and not, so far as I know, self-destructing the way Aaron Sorkin did.
Eldritch B5 had it's strong points, but for the most part it was badly written, individual episodes tended to be mostly filler and kinda boring, and most of the acting was subpar. Boxleitner is pretty, but not much of an actor. What it had going for it was a 5 year story arc (though JMS finished it in four and just kept on going another year) and an interesting idea (both sides in the war being wrong), but the execution wasn't all that great.
September 14, 2010 at 1:56PM ESTsuomynonA @Tom
September 14, 2010 at 5:08PM ESTFirefly/Serenity is superior in every single way to Babylon 5. B5 is the kinda rehashed Star Search guff that relies on space muppets and tired scifi tropes that turned me off of SpaceFi for a decade. The main reason I never even watched Firefly or Serenity until 2009 was the lackluster space-alien scifi that has been churned out with mediocre writing and nonexistent production budgets over the past 4 decades has burned me out.
Firefly is different because story came before gimmicks, and it wasn't about lame aliens that look like iguanas with rayguns.
Firefly was the coolest thing in scifi since Brisco County Jr. Also killed by Fox.
chuchundra Hey Alan, were online during the early 90's when JMS was pumping up his show on every computer network he could get access to? I'll admit, the idea of a proto-Alan Sepinwall going toe-to-toe with the Great Straczyn makes me smile a bit.
September 14, 2010 at 5:44PM ESTJohn C Clearly not a fan of The Big Bang Theory. Sheldon Cooper explained this matter well enough to settle it for all time.
September 17, 2010 at 1:03PM ESTMarkR
September 14, 2010 at 7:54AM EST Reply to CommentThe opening sequence was actually my favorite part of this film...starting with the classroom, the great rescue scene ("Am I making you nervous?"), but especially: "Have you looked at the scan, doctor? At his face? It's love, in point of fact - something a good deal more dangerous" Because I love how the film closes/bookends that scene with the scene of Mal and River in the cockpit - "Love's what keeps her in the air".
fanshawe
September 14, 2010 at 8:04AM EST Reply to CommentI liked the movie a lot more than the show. I thought it did a great job tearing apart the concept of a traditional hero by defining him as the person who gets others killed and really sticking with this throughout the film. Allies die, Wash dies, Book dies, all as a consequence of Mal's actions.
The other thing that sticks with me are the parallels between serenity and death that also play out like variations on a theme, starting with Kaylee's fears about isolation driving them all mad, and later progressing to the image of the ship literally becoming death (while travelling through Reaver space), before they finally make it to Miranda and find out about the events that played out there. Some nice riffs on The Tempest, too, with the names Miranda and Ariel. (Or was Ariel just in the show? I forget.)
I thought the Chinese box structure of the beginning was a pretty elegant way of introducing new viewers to the universe. A flashback inside a rescue sequence inside a recording that the Operative is watching, and you know all you need to know about the setup.
Chiwetel Ejiofor was bloody fantastic as the Operative. I don't think I've missed a single one of his movies since.
Definitely one of my favourite movies this decade.
fanshawe
@capricatv
BullCityFats Another tie-in to the tempest: the serial number of the crashed rescue/survey ship on Miranda was the same as the number of the Bellerephon in "Forbidden Planet", itself an adaptation of "The Tempest".
September 14, 2010 at 3:38PM ESTjacob
September 14, 2010 at 8:05AM EST Reply to CommentSpeaking of the "Veronica Mars" movie, why don't you re-watch VM season 1 for next summer's rewind?
sepinwall As I've said before, too many episodes. Not enough time to fit them all in on a weekly schedule, not enough time in my schedule to do more than one a week, and I'm not comfortable picking and choosing episodes.
September 14, 2010 at 8:07AM ESTbybrandy Sure but how many quality 18 episode seasons are there of things you haven't done? I'm not sure VM would fit the bill but something with a natural break at half season done over two summers seems plausible.
September 14, 2010 at 8:36AM ESTRob How about Wonderfalls?
September 14, 2010 at 10:54PM ESTsepinwall I think I may need a FAQ. Wonderfalls comes up as a suggestion every summer. I didn't like it.
September 14, 2010 at 10:59PM ESTBrice Gilbert
September 14, 2010 at 8:05AM EST Reply to CommentThis scene is one of my favorites ever.
The Operative: I want to resolve this like civilized men. I'm not threatening you. I'm unarmed.
Capt. Malcolm Reynolds: Good.
[pulls gun and shoots Operative in the chest, knocking him into the wall, grabs Inara and gets ready to leave]
The Operative: [grabs Mal from behind] I am, however, wearing full body armor. I am not a moron!
Eldritch One of the great things I love so much about Whedon's writing is the way he breaks the usual tropes. Where else would you see the hero pull his gun and draw on an unarmed villain?
September 14, 2010 at 2:01PM ESTEmperorCheese Raiders of the Lost Ark more than twenty-five years ago.
September 15, 2010 at 6:29PM ESTJust a dumber version of Indiana Jones.
Rick EmperorCheese: The guy Indy shot was NOT unarmed. Sure, he didn't have a gun, but he had two huge swords.
September 16, 2010 at 11:40AM ESTodysseuscm
September 14, 2010 at 8:05AM EST Reply to CommentReading that made me cry a little. Guess I have to watch Serenity tonight.
Mark M
September 14, 2010 at 8:17AM EST Reply to CommentI was quite nervous the first time I went to the cinema to see Serenity, because the last thing you need after such a wonderful series is a disappointing follow-up film. It was impossible not to have very high hopes for the film, but luckily Whedon and crew pulled it off and produced a master piece. I think it served the fans as well as any 2 hour film could, and rounded off the series very well, while still managing to exist in its own right. Very much having your cake and eating it too. I recommended it to a film buff friend who knew nothing about the series, and he thought it stood up on its own Ok. The exposition was very deftly handled by dialogue which was both entertaining and relevant to character. That they were able to assemble the same cast and recreate the sets for the film still seems like a minor miracle to me.
It's still a shame to look back at a series curtailed before its time and think what might have been, but given that a film was all we were ever going to get and we were lucky to get that, I'm very pleased with the result.
My personal favourite line: "Please, spend an hour with him!". The timing and delivery is perfect.
When Farscape was cancelled we eventually got Peacekeeper Wars. Now if only Milch and co could do something for Deadwood, but I guess that's no longer a viable option now.
Hannah Lee I thought the movie did a pretty cagey job of dealing with the exposition in an engaging way. It was quick, informative, visually beautiful and pulled us in emotionally very quickly.
September 14, 2010 at 12:26PM ESTAs a fan of the series, the end of the movie did make me sad, since that was the last we'd get to see of those characters.
My one issue with the movie was a technical one: the sound mixing was horrendous. These characters have such great lines (funny, insightful, moving) but often times, it was hard to hear them. I'd brought a couple of non-Browncoats the the theater with me, and while they enjoyed Serenity, they didn't like it as much as they could have if they actually could have heard all the dialogue. A result of the move from TV to the big-screen, maybe?
Tim
September 14, 2010 at 8:18AM EST Reply to Commentalan, ever consider doing a shield rewind from the beginning? id love to read that....it only goes back as far as season 5 on your old site
Tom
September 14, 2010 at 8:23AM EST Reply to CommentYou're right, Serenity was a lie and a con, a dreadful film filled with bland acting and an uninteresting narrative, I still remember Browncoats practically strong-arming people into watching the accompanying show then name-calling if people dared to have an opinion that differed to their own.
Whedon really got the fans to go with his personality didn't he?
KansasDan Well I never watched any other Whedon show, but Firefly is an amazing series. The characters are great.. the story is great.. everything about it is great. Serenity was a last chance at that greatness, but I would have much rather seen the show play out over several seasons than to have it all smashed into a two hour movie. All the little nuances of the characters were lost in translation IMO.
September 14, 2010 at 8:43AM ESTThank you Alan for this trip down memory lane.
Jess D I agree with Kansas Dan. I loved the series, but was rather disappointed by the movie. It looked great, but I didn't like the main story and I missed the depth of character we got in the series. As Alan notes, it focused almost entirely on Mal and River, and everyone else got short shrift. The character nuances are what made the series so enjoyable, and with that largely missing from the movie, it just didn't work for me. In a sense, it was nice to spend just a little more time with these characters, but it mostly made me wish they had gotten another season to explore the story. It could have been so much richer.
September 14, 2010 at 9:36AM EST
Totally agree with you, KansasDan. I didn't feel exactly cheated out of an emotional ride when I found out the real secret of the Reavers, but more disappointed with Fox that they didn't let it play out over three or four seasons of the show. I think that would've made "Firefly" a top contender in greatest TV series of all time. That's the difference between this show and "Dollhouse." When I saw DH's finale, I was like, "Meh, glad I didn't have to keep watching this show for a year or two to find THAT out."
September 14, 2010 at 9:49AM ESTThe Noble Robot I'm a huge strong-arming Firefly fan, but Dollhouse was a half-formed idea that didn't deserve a second season, Whedon himself drives me nuts with how he ingratiates himself with cliched franchises and properties dispute his reputation as a outsider (I can't understand how the brilliance of the "Objects in Space" commentary comes from the same person who will be directing "The Avengers," blah), and I don't think I will ever watch a single episode of Buffy.
September 14, 2010 at 4:53PM ESTSo careful about how you characterize Firefly fans...
Rick And this is what happens when we engage trolls.
September 16, 2010 at 11:43AM ESTbybrandy
September 14, 2010 at 8:33AM EST Reply to CommentI'd argue the problem with Wash's death is that it made it hard for the faint of heart to geek out at the movies for weeks and weeks at a time like the movie needed to make box office. It is beautifully done and every subsequent time I've seen it I've enjoyed the leaf on the wind triumph even knowing it is going to end terribly. But prior to Wash's death I was like, "wow this movie is awesome I'm going to round up all my friend and see it again" to "Um... yeah... that was great... now I need a break"
Mark M When Wash died, it put me on the edge of my seat. Book was one thing, but Book wasn't quite central enough to up the ante. But when Wash died, I didn't know who was going to make it out alive. It meant that when anyone else got shot I really believed they might die.
September 14, 2010 at 8:51AM ESTLou Wainwright Even though it made the threat level higher (which I disagree was necessary...no one dies in War Stories, or Out of Gas), and even though it really resulted from Tudyk's contract situation, it still ruins the movie for me, because Wash's death just sucks all the enjoyment out of the movie.
September 14, 2010 at 9:08AM ESTWhen we saw it in the theater, my wife (admittedly 7 mo pregnant) got up and LEFT because she couldn't stop crying. That's not a memory that leaves you with a good feeling for a movie. We don't own Serenity, we don't acknowledge Serenity, and we don't enjoy re-watching Firefly as much as we used to, knowing that Wash dies.
SPP At the very least, Wash got treated better than Anya did.
September 14, 2010 at 10:42AM ESTMaggie THIS. The problem is, I was so happy to have these characters back again that they very last thing I wanted was any of them killed off. And Wash was always a favorite. Basically after the way it ended, I didn't want to see it again. I probably would have seen it a few more times if I'd liked it better. (I saw that first godawful Star Wars prequel a whole bunch of times.) I get why Joss did what he did - but it didn't make me want to see it again. In fact, I haven't seen it again since it was in the theater. I bought the DVD, but could never bring myself to watch it. I'd invested too much in the characters, which is not something I do often.
September 14, 2010 at 11:53AM ESTChrissy I have a friend who would agree with your wife completely, Lou Wainwright. She also sort of retroactively dislikes Harry Potter because of things that happen in the final book. I get it, but for me the death happens so close to the end (and it's so clear that there will be no more movies or shows), that the effect is muted. I feel for Zoe and the rest, but I don't watch the show going "there's a dead man". He's still funny and lovely, but their lives are dangerous.
September 14, 2010 at 12:19PM ESTI think one reason his death works for me is that he is usually one of the "safe" characters; he and Kaylee usually stay with the ship, don't fight, don't really get in anyone's way. You expect a fighter like Jayne or Zoe to die in battle, but not the guy with an entire ship's worth of armor.
@SPP: I've heard that the actress who played Anya volunteered to die. By that point I was pretty disgusted with the path Buffy had taken and didn't care much anymore, but it still pains me to think about poor Xander and his inability to keep a girlfriend (alive). That extended into the comics, if I recall, although I didn't read too many. It's hard for me to feel much for Anya, but I definitely sympathize with poor, sweet Xander.
EmperorCheese With each re-viewing of Firefly, I have no loss of enjoyment of the series or see the vast potential of series that could be told.
September 15, 2010 at 6:38PM ESTWhereas with Serenity, I see a hollow and hackneyed piece of tripe that leaves an increasingly foul taste.
Remove all the intelligence, soul and complexity from Firefly and you get the disappointment that is Serenity.
September 14, 2010 at 8:53AM EST Reply to CommentOne of my favorite parts that you didn't mention, Alan, was the acoustic version of the Firefly theme song played at the very end of the credits. I was waiting through the entire movie, wondering if there would be an original or remixed version in the movie, and it gave me one last smile when I finally heard it.
Paul
September 14, 2010 at 8:56AM EST Reply to CommentI always thought that the Operative's story was also a clue into Book's past. A man of great power but without a name or record, who has his belief system utterly crushed, so he goes off to live a completely different life.
Paul I've always thought the same: maybe Book did not get a lot of screen time, but the movie in effect showed his 'origin story' -- he was an operative.
September 14, 2010 at 9:35PM ESTtv Coming in late to this party - just watched the season and movie. I agree with this, that Book was an operative. Wasn't there some consistency with what Book told Mal about needing to "Believe" and having the Operative ask Mal about his "Belief," iirc? Something you get from operative training?
September 28, 2010 at 10:02PM ESTklg19
September 14, 2010 at 8:59AM EST Reply to CommentI hadn't watched "Firefly" when my best friend said, "Let's go see Serenity" on opening night. He hadn't seen "Firefly" either; he just wanted to see a Joss Whedon film. So we went--and we LOVED it. We didn't have all the characters' back stories, but we got that Wash & Zoe were married. And we found the movie so engaging and smart and fun that we both went out and bought the Firefly DVDs. So in that sense I think Joss got the job done.
It's just difficult to get people to watch a movie that's a continuation of a show they've never seen. Has Serenity's DVD sales made the film turn a profit, though?
One thing I wondered if I'd see in your review, Alan:
when the crew is at the Maidenhead, the bar where River gets "triggered," Mal sits down, looks around, and says something like "What a fine bunch of reubens." That happens to be a line from George M Cohan's song "45 Minutes from Broadway," as sung in the Oscar-winning Cohan biopic "Yankee Doodle Dandy." I suspect the Venn diagram of Firefly fans and Yankee Doodle Dandy fans holds pretty much just Joss and me in it; I've mentioned this to hundreds of people and no one else noticed it...
Robert "It's just difficult to get people to watch a movie that's a continuation of a show they've never seen."
September 16, 2010 at 5:36PM ESTEspecially when it released at the very end of September! That's what really irked me the most when everyone points to the films poor box office grosses.
The kids and young adults are back in school and everyone else is returning to the daily work grind and going about their fall business with things like college and pro football, preparing for the coming winter, Halloween, and even making advanced travel plans for the Christmas/New Year's holidays.
I don't recall what other big budget sci-fi or action films were released the summer of 2005, but it seemed like just another insult to Whedon and his fans if FOX was responsible for selecting that stupid release date.
If "Serenity" was released in May, June or July, at least it would have had a fighting chance at attracting moviegoers and making money.
Had to get that off my chest... even this late in the thread.
Ricardo
September 14, 2010 at 9:18AM EST Reply to CommentWrite a comment...
Ricardo
September 14, 2010 at 9:20AM EST Reply to CommentAbout Firefly and Serenity (the movie), I love the series and I think the movie was a great way to finish, though I understand why people who had not seen the series didn't like it that much.
For next summer, how about My So-Called Life?
Stealth
September 14, 2010 at 9:21AM EST Reply to CommentI watched one of the early test screenings (which had even fewer references to Wash and Zoe's marriage, so there was some ADR done there) and my heart was racing all through that final space battle. When Wash died, with Book already gone, and knowing Joss's history, there wasn't a character I thought was safe, apart from Mal and River (as it's their story), until "my turn." I think it's only Inara that doesn't get wounded, even.
I think it's Joss that had my favorite summary of the movie: it's Mal's story, as told by River. Fillion amazes me in this every time I watch, and it saddens me to think that he'll never have a role as good as Malcolm Reynolds.
astrolad
September 14, 2010 at 9:28AM EST Reply to CommentLoved the series and the film.
But what struck me most watching the film was seeing a much darker Mal. I suspect that this version of Mal is the one Whedon wanted for the series, but was forced to change him to please the suits at Fox.
fanshawe I thought the darker Mal was just a natural consequence of his spending time away from Book (the show's moral centre) and Inara (the love interest), and gradually moving toward caution after spending a little too much time around Jayne.
September 14, 2010 at 9:35AM ESTJWIII ASTROLAD, for my understanding, Whedon always wanted a darker protrayal of Mal but the executives at Fox thought the general public would not be into a tv show where main character is brooding.
September 14, 2010 at 12:10PM ESTJeff W
September 14, 2010 at 9:32AM EST Reply to CommentThis was a great Rewind series - thanks, Alan. I vote for My So-Called Life next year, which should be short enough.
Jeff W Or maybe not... didn't realize there were 19 episodes of that. Maybe you could do the first season of Twin Peaks?
September 14, 2010 at 9:35AM ESTzaulsiin Ah, I had forgotten that So-Called had so many episodes. That would have been a brilliant choice.
September 14, 2010 at 10:51AM ESTAnd from the peanut gallery, some other suggestions for great shows that I'd really like to see Alan's expertise applied to:
- Wonderfalls (Fox, 1 season, 13 episodes, 1 hr)
- The Shield (FX, 7 seasons, ~13 episodes each, 1 hr)
- Oz (HBO, 6 seasons, ~8 episodes each, 1 hr)
- NewsRadio (NBC, 5 seasons, ~22 episodes each, 1/2 hr)
- Arrested Development (Fox, 3 seasons, ~18 episodes each, 1/2 hr)
knifoon I second Wonderfalls, and also suggest Andy Richter Controls the Universe.
September 14, 2010 at 4:23PM ESTNumberSix I would also suggest "Profit" starring a pre-Heroes Adrian Pasdar and written by David Greenwalt (who would go on to work on "Buffy" and "Angel"). An interesting mid-90's curio of a show ahead of its time - its antihero is a predecessor to Tony Soprano, Vic Mackey and especially Dexter Morgan.
September 14, 2010 at 4:57PM ESTLarry
September 14, 2010 at 9:47AM EST Reply to CommentThanks for Firefly/Serenity rewinds. It definitely made me appreciate the series and movie even more. I'm always amazed about Whedon's use of an ensemble cast and the dynamics he has playing between the characters. I definitely find myself caring more for the characters and you know that no character is safe when the stakes are high. I enjoyed the movie, but not as much as the tv series. The big budget was nice and all but I'm not sure if I didn't enjoy it as much because it was seemingly the end at the time or if I felt the pacing was just different compared to the series. Still, this makes me want to go back and look at the movie again.
How about, for something half as entertaining, you do the original Battlestar Galactica for next season?
The Noble Robot "How about, for something half as entertaining, you do the original Battlestar Galactica for next season? "
September 14, 2010 at 4:58PM ESTOh God no.
After the nuBSG finale, my wife thought it would be funny to watch the original on Netflix Instantly. She stuck with it all the way though, but I bailed about 8 episodes in.
September 14, 2010 at 9:50AM EST Reply to CommentI actually saw the movie before I had ever seen the shows. I was just graduating college when the movie came out and I thought it looked interesting so I went. I had no idea there was even a show that existed prior. I really enjoyed the movie and was able to pick up on all the things that were important. Once I found out there was a show, I quickly rented all the DVDs and made it through the series. The movie I thought was much better, but the show gave a great deal of depth to the characters. My only critique is that in the show, River never seemed to be a badass fighter or show any inclination she could be, but in the movie she was this ultimate fighting weapon. Did I miss something in the show?
Mark M In the TV show River's story is only just beginning. It is suggested by the end of the series that she has been manipulated by the Alliance surgeons to be telepathic, and possibly to be an assassin. The telepathy shows up as early as the episode Safe, and possibly even Bushwacked, the assassin possibility comes from her actions with the gun in War Stories, and from the suspicions voiced about her in Objects in Space when Kaylee tells her story. In the movie it's made clear from the beginning that the crew is taking advantage of her telepathic ability, but the first time that they realise she has fighting skills is when she is triggered in the bar in Maidenhead. That's likely the first time that she realises it, too.
September 14, 2010 at 11:02AM ESTKansasDan What you, and every one of us, missed was the chance to see River's abilities revealed slowly over time as Whedon probably intended. We knew she was maybe a little psychic, and we knew by her killing of the 3 men in "War Stories", with her eyes closed no less, that there was a little more to her than meets the eye. Kayle was quite scared of River after that if you recall. The many backstories that are left untold is the real tragedy of the way this show was treated by the idiots at FOX. Never learning the backstory of Shephard Book's past, or why Inara left the central planets, or what exactly was done to River (we got the jist of it from Serenity, but it would have been much better if allowed to play out slowly in my opinion) is what is so sad to me about the whole show.
September 14, 2010 at 11:08AM ESTMaybe Whedon will get super famous after The Avengers blows everyone's minds, and be able to make a follow up to Firefly. Stranger things have happened. And a man can dream.
D It was just starting to come out in War Stories- when she was able to handle a gun and kill three guys with three bullets without even looking. I think if the series had continued, we would have seen a lot more hints.
September 14, 2010 at 1:43PM ESTmagic34015 And the stuff in War Stories was pointed to again in the movie when River takes over the ships bridge and Mal says something about having to kill him and she points the gun right at him withour even lookin. The Mal says "Or, we can talk about it."
September 15, 2010 at 11:23AM ESTmjrhoff
September 14, 2010 at 9:57AM EST Reply to CommentGreat reviews, Alan. Thanks for giving me an excuse to go back and finally watch this show. For the record, I watched the movie a few years ago without having seen any episodes (except for maybe "Objects in Space") and enjoyed it immensely.
ben
September 14, 2010 at 9:58AM EST Reply to Commentwatching serenity n firely makes me really scared for the avengers movie because whedon is an overrated director who has never made anything good
Joseph I'll save you the fright--you are going to hate the Avengers if you think Joss has "never made anything good."
September 14, 2010 at 7:48PM ESTSchmoker
September 14, 2010 at 10:02AM EST Reply to CommentOne, thanks for doing this, Alan. I'm not much for nostalgia, but Firefly is the one bit of unfinished business I always think about with a sigh. It's always worth revisiting, and topping it off with the film was very satisfying.
That said, Serenity, which was a great film, certainly points up how media has changed in the last 20 years. As great a capper as it was (and I can't see how it could have been any better), it pointed up just how inferior film is to television when it comes to telling complex stories, and especially to creating rich and fulfilling characters. While I thought the harder tone of the film to be superior to that of the series (which, by the way, had a very hard tone for a TV show, especially one written coming out of the 90's), it was the only thing non-budget related that was superior. When it comes to reaching into the bowels of my soul (wear a glove), television blows film away these days.
As for Wash, Joss has since confirmed that Alan T would not sign a multi-pic deal, and that he had to have a shorter shooting schedule due to a conflict with a play he was performing in, and that was why Wash bit the dust. It's on the commentary on the Blu-Ray. Whedon also said that he now feels that killing Wash was essential to the tension of the final reel, but that it was not his original intent until the contract and scheduling problems with Tudyk caused him to pretty much have to kill off Wash.
Worked for me, as I spent the last reel really thinking that perhaps he was going to kill the whole frakking crew. The stakes for that final firefight went through the roof after Wash's death, and with each hit a crew member took, I balled my fists even tighter.
KansasDan No doubt. I don't remember breathing for the last 20 minutes. I think I was literally shaking when I walked out of there. I hated that Wash died, but it did make for some tension during the last act. I can't remember feeling that in any movie since I was a kid.
September 14, 2010 at 11:21AM ESTChrissy Aw, I sort of hate that. I would have been ok with a second movie where Zoe and Wash have had a baby and he's on some planet raising it up while Zoe goes on runs with Mal (as one possible way of keeping Wash out of the film or only giving him a minor role). I'm ok with his death and I think it works, but I don't love that it was added in for real-world reasons.
September 14, 2010 at 12:24PM ESTThe Noble Robot I am an indie filmmaker, and my motto is always to "fill the corners of the box" rather than "think outside the box" because there's never enough time or money, and often the best ideas come from practical limitations.
September 14, 2010 at 5:08PM ESTFrom a story perspective, Wash was the best person to kill in that moment, not just because it gave the audience true tension, but because Wash as a character wouldn't really have been able to contribute anything unique to the rest of the story.
Also, since his emotional ties were mainly with Zoe, it gave her a great purpose in the final Act, while if someone else had died (like Simon who had multiple ties, or Jayne who pretty much had none), we wouldn't have gotten any extra dimension from the remaining characters.
The fact that it arose from a logistical consideration is probably why it ended up so great in the final film. If Joss had come up with it independently, he might have died in the final firefight or at the very end of the film, or maybe even earlier (as a bigger WTF moment).
Sometimes outside pressures contribute to crafting the best possible story. Surprising, but true.
Col Bat Guano
September 14, 2010 at 10:15AM EST Reply to CommentI saw the movie after watching the show so I can't tell how hard it would be for the uninitiated to follow. I just know that I really enjoyed the movie and while I hated that Wash was killed, it was probably necessary to give the film some heft. Both the Operative and the Reavers made excellent villians and I'm glad you mentioned all the humor. The Mal-Inara banter is always funny.
Whenever I see one of those bottomless shafts I'm reminded of the scene in "Galaxy Quest" where Sigourney Weaver and Tim Allen find themselves in one in the bowels of the ship along with the smashy cruncy things and she yells "This episode was badly written!"
klg19 I LOVE that scene. "Whoever wrote this episode should DIE!!"
September 16, 2010 at 9:27AM ESTTausif Khan
September 14, 2010 at 10:25AM EST Reply to CommentI say the following comments with the knowledge that know movie can capture the richness of character and plot development of a television show.
I felt that the movie was a mashup between Star Wars, Star Trek and Resident Evil.
This is because Serenity-The Pilot almost as long as the movie had far more richness and depth and told a better deeper story. Serenity to me was a better stand alone movie than Serenity- The movie.
Furthermore Joss reveals on the commentary Joss wrote a script as richly developed at the show and he got the response back from Universal "this is great and beautiful, now make a movie."
My problems with Whedon and race continue here because Whedon loves to have richly drawn villains but here the villain just remains a stock character. Once again he casts a well known black actor (Chiwetel Ejifor) as the villain an agent of the alliance. He is so similar to Jubal Early that I was confused during the movie. I thought they were the same character but they were not. Brooks played a Bounty Hunter, Ejifor plays a government operative. What annoyed me the most is that in the commentary Whedon justified his reduction of character development in the villain for entertainment value by saying "that the character popped more". I am sorry but characters are not hot dogs. Whedon also justifies this by giving the understandable reason that he had to decide between chracter development of the main cast versus the villain. Because people have paid to see the heroes this is understandable. However, Whedon's tales are strong because of the immense struggle that his characters have to go through. Whedon gains so much strength in his writing by playing his main characters off strong villains who realize their own sense of self after a while. By underplaying this Whedon undersells himself. More importantly it does not help his depiction of race on screen.
Most importantly once again a biracial couple is broken up through death with the death of Wash (Book also dies which is significant given that he is played by a black actor).
Whedon does little to overturn the tropes of race on screen.
Chrissy I really, really disagree that the Operative is a stock character. I find him endlessly fascinating. How often does a "villain" have such a considered life philosophy for motivation? Most villains are crazy and/or greedy and/or vengeful. The Operative is none of these. He has made the choice to do bad things for a better world - in some ways he is quite like Mal (who is willing to make hard decisions in order to protect the well-being of a small band of loved ones) on a larger scale. He believes fully in the better future, and accepts that he can have no part of it - I think that's a beautiful sentiment, and the Operative shows how an intelligent, thoughtful person can do great evil without malice. It's really rich.
September 14, 2010 at 12:32PM ESTI mean, we don't get character development in the sense of "this character has two sisters and a dog and likes bocci ball", but that's not the point at all. We get a character who has *already* developed, and then finds out that the basis for everything he has made himself become is faulty. Awesomeness.
Andy Well said, Chrissy! I agree 100%. I thought The Operative was a great villain and a perfect foil for Mal. We didn't need to learn about his past. We learned about WHO he is and what his viewpoint was, which was far more important. Instand of being a mustache-twirling cliche of a villain, he had far more depth and substance. And, frankly, I think his color is irrelevant.
September 14, 2010 at 1:15PM ESTZach Found the Operative tedious. Whedon reminds me of Lucas in this way: incongruent or just weird diction in an ethnic character is supposed to stand in for character development. It reads like a stencil or cartoon. And any freshman college student knows ponderous exposition does not do the job. Less for the actor to say, more for him to do, if you want the audience to come along.
September 14, 2010 at 1:57PM ESTI was completely uninvested in The Operative from beginning to end, he came off smooth and featureless as a plastic action figure. If Whedon was going for a Bizarro Evil Sidney Poitier, he did not pull it off.
The Noble Robot Your criticisms of the Operative can only be fair if movies like (any) Star Wars or (any) Star Trek had better, richer ones. They did not.
September 14, 2010 at 5:15PM ESTAlthough, he did remind me of Early a little in that he has practically the same purpose (get River, kill everyone else, be creepy), but Early was batshit crazy and made philosophical actions, while the Operative was gentlemanly and made perfectly rational, political actions.
Yes they're both black and talkative, and it's not tone-deaf to point out the similarities, but they really are different.
EmperorCheese The Operative has the delineated mindset ascribed by Machiavelli in "The Prince."
September 15, 2010 at 6:56PM ESTA character with the ethos founded in a prescription for power that was written several hundred years ago isn't that original...
And as for the bad man doing good things for a society he cannot join, well "The Searchers" did it much earlier, and better, as well.
He was a terrible adversary for a protagonist whose initial depth was stripped away in the movie.
Dale Cooper
September 14, 2010 at 10:48AM EST Reply to CommentGreat rewind Alan. Looking forward to next year's lineup. Might I suggest a look at Twin Peaks?
Anne
September 14, 2010 at 11:21AM EST Reply to CommentI guess I'm in the minority then: What got me into Firefly was seeing Serenity in 2005 in theaters (quite a few times). From MY outside perspective, it was no worse off than any other ensemble cast at letting me get to know the characters (and way better than, for example, the recent Inception movie). My brother and sister were the same. Though our dad didn't much like it...
One thing that always stands out to me, going from movie to series, is that I had no idea who Book and Inara were. It was weird having Book go from just as random and uninvolved as Fanty and Mingo and the people like that, to an actually really important character.
Anyway, great review. :) Interesting points!
The Noble Robot " It was weird having Book go from just as random and uninvolved as Fanty and Mingo and the people like that, to an actually really important character."
September 14, 2010 at 5:25PM ESTIt seems that the movie was made with the idea that people who didn't see the series might never go back to watch it, and so I think Whedon and co didn't mind people thinking that characters like Book and Mr. Universe were equals.
In fact, we get a Mr. Universe holo-gravestone, just like Wash and Book get, at the end of the film just to show that the movie isn't beholden to the characters from the TV show.
Dudleys Mom
September 14, 2010 at 11:29AM EST Reply to CommentFirst of all, I loved "Firefly" the series. When I went to the movie, I had such high hopes. I guess I was an idiot, I was hoping it would be so great that it would really take off and maybe (!!) even get another shot on my TV. Because, I couldn't imagine that the world wouldn't love it if they Just. Tried. It. I was a fool to have that much faith in movie audiences (although I contend that this series is worth that kind of adoration). And overall, I would say that I really liked the movie.
That being said. I agree with your observation about the movie being mostly about Mal and River. However, I thought all the cast looked uncomfortable on the movie screen. I love Fillion, and would watch him in anything, but he was eminently believable on my TV screen, and yet thoroughly remained an 'actor' when I watched him in the movie. Glau is interesting. She gets more beautiful every year, somehow. But she did not seem like a movie star up there; I like her very much, but she's a ballerina, not an actress (yet?).
I was not spoiled for Wash's death, yet somehow instantly knew it was about contracts and money. Maybe Joss has taught me to be cynical.
Throughout, I kept being impatient at all the exposition (while admiring how well it was being done) because it meant that there wasn't much NEW story, that I was eager to gobble up. Yet, I also watched with a sinking heart, realizing that even all that exposition wouldn't probably convert your casual moviegoer into a fan, and they would never appreciate the show just by experiencing the movie, and would in fact be impatient at all the exposition they needed to assimilate in order to enjoy the movie (again, cynicism!).
But more than anything, TV is a series of small, intimate moments, observed carefully, built upon layer by layer, until you have something really special. TV benefits from replay and review, when you parse all the meaning and let it resonate with your life. It's in your home, it's personal. Movies are different: the story is put upon you, laid out and presented as a fait accompli. You don't really interact with a movie in the same way, and it's mostly about the big moments, not the small moments that get under your skin. And I guess I'm saying that I want those small moments and layers, and I think that, more than anything, that's the way to appreciate JOSS. He's not a creator you can sample in two hours. You have to let him worm his way into your soul, and you have to be the kind of person that wants that experience (most people don't, that's why his shows are cult favorites and will never be mainstream). So in that way, "Serenity: The Movie" failed for me, as a mismatch of what's great about Joss's vision and the medium itself.
I've put my Serenity DVD in the machine a few times, intending to watch this again. I always end up stopping it, sometimes going back and watching the series. And when I do watch the series, I always cry at the end, at what could have been.
{sorry for such an overwrought comment—this show brings it out in me}
Emily I completely agree with what you said about letting Joss worm into your soul, and that most people won't, or can't, let that happen. That is what really makes Joss the genious that he is; that he is able to get to your core and really effect you as a person. And I agree that that is the reason why people don't like his stuff, because they are unable to let him in and fully appreciate what he gives his audience.
September 14, 2010 at 4:41PM ESTAnd your comment was not overwrought, it was very intuitive, thanks for sharing!
Bitsy
September 14, 2010 at 11:58AM EST Reply to CommentI watched Serenity in the theater before knowing a thing about Firefly and got pretty quickly in those opening scenes that Zoe and Wash were married. I thought that "talk to your husband" line initially referred to Jayne, for some reason, until the scenes where Wash is referring to Zoe as "honey." The only jarring part of the movie were the references to Inarra. I considered her a really pointless character, not a good match for Mal, mostly because of her walking around in those fussy kimonos in an action movie. And surprise! I hated her when I got around to watching the series, too. She just never had much of a place in the show or the movie.
Just a guest
September 14, 2010 at 12:34PM EST Reply to CommentAlan, another short lived sci fi series that you might like for a summer rewinde is Odyssey 5 that ran on Showtime. I caught it on a scifi marathon one day and thought it was pretty good.
Just a guest make that rewind...
September 14, 2010 at 12:35PM EST- 1
- 2
Next 129 Comments