Cannes Film Festival 2013

Emmys '11 Predictions: Comedy & Drama Supporting Actor

Four 'Modern Family' men and an impressive drama field

<p>Walton Goggins from "Justified."</p>

Walton Goggins from "Justified."

Credit: FX

Are you a fan of Emmy Awards 2011?

Sign up to get the latest updates instantly.

The 2011 Primetime Emmy Awards are on September 18th, and it's time once again for Fienberg and I to discuss whom we think should and will win(*) some of the major categories. We're continuing to double up categories in order to finish in time, this time with the two Outstanding Supporting Actor categories, for both comedy and drama.

(*) As always, we remind you we do not have impressive track records at prognostication. Place your wagers (or, preferably not) accordingly.

On the comedy side, voters apparently couldn't choose from among the four men of "Modern Family" and wound up nominating them all. (And whatever role this played in Nick Offerman not getting nominated for playing Ron Effing Swanson is un-effing-acceptable.) Your nominees:

Ty Burrell, "Modern Family"
Chris Colfer, "Glee"
Jon Cryer, "Two and a Half Men"
Jesse Tyler Ferguson, "Modern Family"
Ed O'Neill, "Modern Family"
Eric Stonestreet, "Modern Family"

Should win


Alan's pick: Stonestreet, last year's deserving winner, was very poorly-served by the "MF" writers this year, who kept asking him to play the same whiny, over-sensitive note week in and week out. Of his co-stars, Burrell was probably my favorite this season, though an argument could also be made for O'Neill. That said, I have to throw my fictional vote here to Colfer, who managed to get even better as "Glee" got significantly worse around him. It wasn't in any way a comedic performance, but he's eligible in the category, and he was terrific, to the point that when he was on screen, I wasn't questioning why I was watching this show.

Dan's pick: Chris Colfer was tremendous in "Grilled Cheesus," his submission episode. It's a heartbreaking episode in which nothing he did was even slightly funny, but he's heartbreaking. If you like "funny" with your comedy, I'd put my vote behind Burrell, who has the role-reversal "Good Cop Bad Dog" for his submission episode. But if all the voters are asked to do is pick the best performance in the category, Colfer has it in the bag.

Will win

Alan's pick: For all the talk of vote-splitting, Stonestreet managed to win last year against two of his co-stars. Will four "Modern" men be one too many? I think maybe, especially since there isn't a clear favorite among them the way Stonestreet was last year with "Fizbo." So barring some kind of sympathy vote for Cryer and all that he and "Men" endured this season, I'm guessing Colfer.

Dan's pick: I said Burrell had the funniest of the submission episodes, but Ferguson had the most flamboyant, with "Halloween," an episode that ends with him climbing out of a building in a Spider-Man costume. "Halloween" is, in fact, full of big and broad moments for Ferguson and, as such, is more comedically showy than anything his rivals could put up. This category is often ripe for confusing upsets and I'm predicting a Ferguson victory. [Personally speaking, I really disliked "Halloween."]

The wealth is spread a fair bit more among the drama nominees, though there are still a couple of co-stars. Your nominees:

Andre Braugher, "Men of a Certain Age"
Josh Charles, "The Good Wife"
Alan Cumming, "The Good Wife"
Peter Dinklage, "Game of Thrones"
Walton Goggins, "Justified"

John Slattery, "Mad Men"

Should win

Alan's pick:
This is an impressive category, with a multiple Emmy winner in Braugher and several other past nominees in Cumming and Slattery. Nearly anyone would be a deserving winner (though Charles' load was a bit lighter than the other 5), but I'm torn between two first-time nominees: Goggins as charismatic, unpredictable outlaw Boyd Crowder and Dinklage as charismatic, clever imp Tyrion Lannister. You can't go wrong with either one, so I'll go with sentiment and give Goggins extra credit for his never-nominated work on "The Shield."

Dan's pick: Dinklage ended up as the heart, soul and funny bone of "Game of Thrones" and I'd love to see him win for all manner of reasons. All of the actors in this category are terrific and in different years any of them (with the probable exception of Charles) could deserve this prize. Dinklage is my top choice, but Cumming may be my No. 2, simply because every single time he's on-screen, his version of "The Good Wife" is one I'd rather watch than the show when he's absent. The gulf between Cumming and the show without him is, for me, wider than any of the other nominees in this category.

Will win

Alan's pick:
There hasn't been a repeat winner in this category in more than a decade, and with Aaron Paul ineligible because "Breaking Bad" took more than a year off, there won't be one this year. With Paul out, the "Lost" guys retired, etc., it's anyone's field. My guess is Braugher, who already has two Emmys and was playing very much against type on the late, lamented "Men." (On the plus side, the show's final six episodes, where Braugher did his best work of the series, will be eligible next Emmy season, so even if he doesn't win on the 18th, it's not quite over.)

Dan's pick: This is a coin-flip. "Game of Thrones" is likely to win some technical prizes, but Dinklage is its only real chance to win a big ticket award. With "Hands and Knees," Slattery has a great submission episode and "Mad Men" is due to get a little acting Emmy love. Goggins should probably have been nominated for four or five Emmys already and voters could want to make up for past snubbings. And Andre Braugher is Andre Braugher. But I think Emmy voters like "The Good Wife" and Cumming would be a showy way to recognize the show. He's my prediction. [Yes, my guesses are pretty much going off the rails at this point.]

What do you think?

Alan-sepinwall-sm
Alan Sepinwall
Sr. Editor, What's Alan Watching
Alan Sepinwall has been reviewing television since the mid-'90s, first for Tony Soprano's hometown paper, The Star-Ledger, and now for HitFix. His new book, "The Revolution Was Televised," about the last 15 years of TV drama, is for sale at Amazon. He can be reached at sepinwall@hitfix.com

Comments

  • Option 1

    Comment instantly as a guest Guest
  • Option 2

    Connect
  • Option 3

    Login or create a HitFix account Login Signup
  • Default-avatar

    AgentWhiskers

    Nick Offerman was snubbed from all categories this year.

    September 11, 2011 at 9:12AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jobin

    Sorry, but this entire page should just say "RON F'N SWANSON" 250 times and nothing more. Travesty.

    September 11, 2011 at 10:15AM EST Reply to Comment
    • If Ron F'ing Swanson was nominated, their comedy "should win" picks would be a lot shorter.

      September 11, 2011 at 2:29PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Merve I really don't get the ridiculous amount of love for Ron Swanson. Nick Offerman is good. So are a whole bunch of other actors.

      September 11, 2011 at 5:26PM EST
    • 500full_talkback_profile

      velocityknown Agreed. This category means nothing to me without him at least nominated.

      September 11, 2011 at 6:12PM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Some Guy "Nick Offerman is good. So are a whole bunch of other actors."
      Even if your not the biggest Swanson fan, would you really argue that any of the actual nominees in that category gave a better comedic performance than he has, consistently, in the last 2 seasons of Parks and Rec?

      September 15, 2011 at 6:07AM EST
    • Default-avatar

      Fidelio Nick Offerman is wonderful, and I don't know if anyone is more deserving than him, but I'd definitely have a hard time choosing between him and Ty Burrell.

      Burrell has had a much more difficult character than Offerman to pull off. No matter who played Ron Swanson, all of his dynamite lines would make him a fan favorite. Whereas Phil on Modern Family is a character that could very easily come across like a poor man's Michael Scott. It's mostly due to Burrell's charisma, and his ability to humanize his immature, goofy character, that Phil is likeable.

      September 18, 2011 at 6:44AM EST
  • Default-avatar

    Nah Mean

    LOL at four nominations for Modern Family actors.

    September 11, 2011 at 11:49AM EST Reply to Comment
  • Madmen_icon_talkback_profile

    LJA

    O'Neill, Dinklage.

    September 11, 2011 at 12:08PM EST Reply to Comment
    • Default-avatar

      Joe Agreed.

      September 11, 2011 at 6:03PM EST
  • Default-avatar

    JRB

    Chris Colfer should definitely win his catagory this year. He was amazing!

    September 11, 2011 at 1:22PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    Jim D.

    Darn shame that both Arliss Howard and Michael Cristofer were ignored for their exceptional work on Rubicon.

    September 11, 2011 at 7:39PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    briguyx

    You guys don't really think the voters just pick on whatever the submitted episode is, do you? If they don't watch the show every week, they'll vote on an episode they caught or what the buzz says...

    September 11, 2011 at 9:02PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Summer09hitfix_talkback_profile

    gregel

    Alan Cumming! He better win!

    September 11, 2011 at 10:13PM EST Reply to Comment
  • Default-avatar

    troopermsu

    For comedy, since Offerman wasn't nominated I don't really care that much; so long as Cryer doesn't win. How anything from that piece of garbage show 'Three and a Half Men' gets nominated is a flipping farce.

    Drama: I'd be satisfied with any of those winners but Dinklage and Cumming and Goggins would satisfy me more than the others. Can there be a three-way tie???

    September 12, 2011 at 11:24AM EST Reply to Comment

Get Instant Alerts on What's Alan Watching

HitFix Poll

Who *deserves* to win the Outstanding Supporting Actor, Drama Emmy?

Latest Posts
More Posts
Recent Activity on Facebook
Most Popular on Facebook
Top Stories From Around the Web